Thanks, Kenny. We had a very busy first quarter in 2019. We carried out many of our strategic actions and are continuing to implement them. We significantly improved our operations and profitability. And we achieved the financing that provides additional liquidity to execute our plans. Let me now get into the results of the quarter. The first quarter consolidated revenues were $231.9 million. They were down about 8.4% as compared to the 2018 quarter. The decrease, however, was primarily the result of several EPC contracts being in the final stages of completion in the first quarter and, therefore, generating lower revenue than in the prior -- in the 2018 quarter. The GAAP operating loss in the first quarter of 2019 was $74.4 million lower than the 2018 quarter. The loss in 2019 was $32 million compared to an operating loss of $106.4 million in the first quarter of 2018. Prior to the first quarter of 2019, the most significant drivers of the company's operating losses were the charges for the 6 European EPC loss contracts. In the first quarter of 2019, the most significant drivers are our operating losses or settlement costs related to certain EPC contracts, restructuring activities and advisory fees. Adjusted EBITDA loss was $72.6 million lower in the first quarter of 2019 at a negative $5 million as compared to $77.6 million negative in the first quarter of 2018. In the first quarter of '19, the company changed its calculation of adjusted EBITDA to exclude net pension benefit, foreign currency exchange effects and exclude other income and expense so, all references to adjusted EBITDA both on a comparable basis and a consistent basis going forward will be calculated on that basis and as additionally as we disclose it in the reconciliation. Now let me turn to our first quarter segment results. The Babcock & Wilcox segment, formerly the Power segment, revenues increased 18.5% to $188.6 million in the first quarter of '19 as compared to $159.1 million in the prior year period. This increase was mainly driven by larger construction, new build and industrial projects. The gross profit in the Babcock & Wilcox segment in the first quarter of '19 was $31.1 million as compared to $30.9 million in the prior year-end. This percentage-wise lower gross profit reflects a higher mix of lower margin construction revenue in the 2019 quarter as a percentage of our total revenue, and it includes the construction services performed at no margin for the SPIG segment on its single loss project in the U.S. The gross profit margin was 16.5% in the '19 quarter as compared to 19.4% in the same quarter last year. And again, this was impacted, as I explained above, by the project mix of a greater amount of construction in our revenues in the first quarter. Notwithstanding this lower gross profit percentage in the '19 quarter, adjusted EBITDA for the quarter of 2019 increased 115% to $9 million as compared to $4.2 million in last year's quarter. This increase is mainly attributable to the impact of our cost-saving initiatives, and those cost-saving initiatives were partially offset by approximately a $2.3 million increase in the level of corporate overhead that's absorbed by this segment compared to the prior quarter. The adjusted EBITDA margin also improved in the 2019 quarter to 4.8% as compared to 2.6% in the same period last year, so a strong quarter for our Power business. In the SPIG segment, formerly called the Industrial segment, revenues decreased 21.3% to $28.9 million in the first quarter of '19 as compared to $36.7 million in the 2018 quarter. This was mainly due to lower volume of new build cooling systems, and this was expected following a 2017 change in strategy to improve profitability by more selectively bidding and focusing on core geographies and products and driving for more profitability in our contracts rather than just increases in revenue. Gross profit improved to a positive $3.7 million in the first quarter of 2019 compared to a gross profit a negative gross profit of $2.8 million in the prior period, the improvement was primarily from the effects of the new strategy and from continued progress achieved on the small number of remaining legacy new build cooling system contracts that were remained in the quarter without incurring significant increases in that in their estimated cost, whereas in the first quarter of 2018 there were higher estimated costs to complete those projects. Adjusted EBITDA improved to an $8 million positive to $700,000 compared to a negative $7.3 million in the same period last year. Again, this is driven by the improvement in gross profit from our strategic change in strategic direction and from the implementation of cost-saving initiatives that we’ve taken at SPIG. Moving on to Vølund, our Vølund segment. First quarter revenues in the Vølund segment, formerly the Renewable segment, were $29.5 million in the first quarter of 2019 compared to $60 million in the first quarter of 2018. The first quarter revenues were lower compared to the prior year quarter as several of the European EPC loss contracts were in the final stages of completion in 2019 resulting in lower construction revenue being recognized than was recognized in 2018. Additionally, the March 29, 2019, settlements on certain of the EPC contracts resulted in a reduction of revenue recognition in the first quarter. The variance was also driven by the sale of the Palm Beach Resource Recovery Corporation in September of 2018 and limited bidding on Vølund renewable energy contracts as we made an overt decision to not bid on full EPC contracts. The segment gross profit improved by $47.5 million to a negative $2.9 million in the first quarter as compared to a $50.4 million negative reported in the first quarter of 2018. In the first quarter of 2018, the segment recorded a $52.6 million in net loss, resulting from changes in estimated revenues and cost to compete in the six European EPC contracts as compared to a $4.1 million of losses recorded in the first quarter of 2019 and this includes the effects of the 2019 project settlements. Beyond the effect of the loss contracts, the first quarter 2019 gross profit was affected by lower levels of direct overhead support and warranty expense, offset by the absence of gross profit from the Palm Beach Resource Recovery Corporation that, as I mentioned, was sold in the third quarter of 2018. The adjusted EBITDA loss in the quarter improved was lower by $52.9 million to a negative $8.9 million compared to negative $61.8 million in the first quarter last year. Again, this was due mainly to reduced gross profit losses experienced in the EPC contracts as well as lower SG&A cost reflecting benefits of our restructuring and cost reduction activities. Let me now turn to cash flow, our balance sheet and liquidity. Cash flow from operations in the quarter was a use of $37.7 million. This was mainly due to the spending related to progress toward completion of the EPC loss contracts as well as the settlement cost, restructuring cost and advisory fees, offset by strong cash flow from the Babcock & Wilcox and SPIG segments working capital. We ended the first quarter, March 31, 2019, with $43.5 million of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents. That number is before the financing that we achieved subsequent to the end of the first quarter. Our total revolving debt was $175.3 million at the end of the first quarter, and our interest expense was $11.1 million as compared to $13.5 million in the prior year quarter. As previously discussed in our filings and press releases in the first quarter of -- in the first quarter and in April of 2019, we entered into a number of amendments on our revolving credit facility and borrowed an additional $160 million through last-out term loans as described in those filings. The proceeds from the last-out term loans were used to pay amounts due under the EPC loss project settlement agreements and our debt placement fees and expenses and some paydown of our revolver. The remainder is available for future working capital needs. On April 8, after closing of the $160 million of last-out term loans, repayment of a portion of the revolver, repayment of the settlement due under the EPC loss contracts settlement agreements and the payment of debt placement fees, the company had liquidity of approximately $54 million made up of unrestricted cash on hand plus borrowing availability under its revolver. As part of our most recent amendment, we agreed to seek shareholder approval to execute a $50 million rights offering at $0.30 per share within six months; exchange all of the principal of the last-out term loan held by Vintage Capital Management for common stock at $0.30 per share; approximately -- issue approximately 16.7 million warrants, each to purchase 1 share of common stock at $0.01 per share to B. Riley or its designee; and execute a reverse stock split. We are now preparing to seek shareholder approval for these actions as this relates to curing our New York Stock Exchange continued listing criteria deficiency. Based on the expected timing of the Annual Shareholder Meeting, we have been permitted under the NYSE rules to go beyond the six month cure period to request required shareholder approval on the corporate action that we plan to take. Our most recent amendment, also among other things, permits us to repay up to $86 million of the last-out term loans using the proceeds from the rights offering. It increases our borrowing capacity by reducing our required minimum liquidity to $30 million from $40 million and requires that we refinance the existing credit facility by March 15, 2020. As Kenny will discuss further, we've identified and begun implementation of approximately $100 million in annualized savings through our cost-saving initiatives. Roughly three fourth of these cost-saving measures have been implemented to date and with the balance being implemented over the remainder of 2019 and into early 2020. The cost savings have been identified across all segments and at the corporate level, and the implementation plan and savings are progressing in line with our expectations. Finally, as previously stated, based on a number of ongoing strategic actions and cost savings initiative, the company does not intend to provide guidance at this point in time. I'll now turn it back over to Kenny to discuss our strategy going forward.