Thanks, Jon and Chris. Good morning and good afternoon to everyone on the call today. I'm on page 11, which shows a summary of the Burford-only financials. Chris mentioned comparisons to 2023 for the same period are going to be difficult given that right at the end of March last year, we received the positive news regarding summary judgment on the YPF cases. So I'm going to touch on a couple of the key numbers here and then go into greater detail on the following pages. In total, we had $31 million of revenue for the period. The capital provision income and asset management income breakouts are shown on the right of the page. Net income per share for the quarter was the negative $0.14. Tangible book value is just shy of $10, including the intangible were slightly above $10 level at $10.34 per share. Overall, the loss was impacted and I'll talk more about it by various fair value movements including lots that had nothing to do directly with case development. And as Chris mentioned, there were no material negative case developments in the portfolio. We'll talk more about expenses, but those start to normalize from some of the one-time items that we also saw in 2023. On the asset side, we're at approximately $3.4 billion of capital provision assets. Of that, we've got $1.6 billion in our deployed cost. Of that $3.4 billion, the YPF assets are approximately $1.4 billion. And we have $490 million of fair value gain relative, embedded in that number, relative to the rest of the portfolio excluding YPF. This fair value represents only a 31% uplift to deployed cost of the assets. So in summary there's a lot more room to run with respect to the assets. I'm going to move to page 12 now. This page breaks down capital provision income into all of the components. Gross realized gains in Q1 were $45 million and looking at the details that's a $6 million increase compared to last year's first quarter. We did however have a loss, a partial loss in a subcase associated with a larger portfolio, which drove the net number associated with realized gains lower. Let me go a little deeper into that. So as we've described our business, we look to do multi-case portfolios. When we do that, those are cross-collateralized, so that when one subcase loses, our counterparty is required to make up that loss from other cases. So on a cash basis, we look at the portfolio as one deal and we measured cash inflows and cash outflows and that structure is very efficient and effective in preventing capital loss. However, we do allocate some of that invested capital to each subcase in the portfolio. So when in this case a subcase in the portfolio loses, we could incur a loss and we did, even though we don't actually suffer a loss on a portfolio wide basis. In particular, in this first quarter, that's exactly what happened. A subcase in a large portfolio [lost] (ph), we had allocated $15 million to that case from the portfolio and now book a realized loss for that amount. But the portfolio as a whole is and has been successful. We've already recovered all of our capital back on this asset and some profit. And we do anticipate additional profit going forward from the asset. Moving on, asset valuations are also impacted by duration and time value of money. I know I've talked about that before, and I've also talked about how the accounting movement here doesn't impact the ultimate resolution of any asset. In the first quarter, we saw an increase in discount rates across the portfolio. This increase was approximately 20 basis points, and that represents a $22 million headwind to valuations. The discount rate generally follows market trends and rates, and we would expect to see volatility in quarters when there are broader rate movements for financial instruments. Of course, we focus on cash resolution of our assets and not this interim fluctuation. I'm going to move to Slide 13. This is the overview of our asset management business, which continues to perform. And we enjoy the benefits and rewards of using the funds to augment the core balance sheet business. In quarters where we don't see significant movement with respect to our assets, we wouldn't anticipate seeing significant asset management income. This business is also a cash on cash business, meaning that while we book the income with movements of the fair value movement of the assets, the actual payout is only when we see cash in the funds. We did, though, received $4 million of cash receipts from the business. As we've discussed, the overwhelming majority of this income is driven by our partnership with the Sovereign Wealth partner in BOFC. We think about that as a source of incremental liquidity for a balance sheet business that earns a performance fee. As a reminder that BOFC takes approximately 25% of nearly all of the new commitments on a pure pro rata basis. Moving to page 14, I'm going to shift from revenues to expenses for a moment. We spent a lot of time last year talking about expenses and the various movement in expenses, some which are that period, some which are accruals associated with the accounting driven by different fair value movements or other one-time items. Overall, first quarter expenses are down and we're only 55% of last year's total when looking at the same period. Main components like salary and benefits, the annual incentive comp, share-based comp remain generally flat year-over-year. Annual incentive comp represents, this is a reminder, represents discretionary bonuses for our employees and that gets finalized in the fourth quarter. One of the lines that we've historically spoke about is the legacy asset recovery expense and the accrual that was related to -- for all effective purposes and burnout for the purchase of that business. We had mentioned that there's only one asset left in that arrangement and we've thus collapsed that line item into the long-term incentive compensation line as we don't believe that there'll be any material changes associated with it in the future. Reminder again, those expenses are accruals. So the long-term incentive comp or the legacy asset recovery line were only paid out and are only the [cashers] (ph), only goes out the door when we receive the cash from the investor. You'll see case-related expenditures that are ineligible for inclusion in the asset are down and have reduced significantly from last year, especially period over period. This trend, you know, we looked at this in the fourth quarter, that was approximately $1 million. Now we're down close to half that figure. We would expect to see some volatility in that over time but as of right now you know this year so far only $500,000 I'm going to move to page 15, which is our liquidity and leverage page. Chris pointed out that we sit on a very strong liquidity position at this point with over $500 million of cash and securities, as well as another $132 million of -- are due from settlement or receivables. Just to go a little bit deeper, though, on one of the point from previous slides, the $138 million of cash receipts that came in, that came from a breadth of individual assets with five different assets producing more than $10 million each. So like the depth and breadth in that number. Earlier in the quarter we took advantage of a robust high-yield market issuing $275 million add-on to our June 2023 issuance. And we had done that at 120 basis points inside of the original issue yield on just six months earlier. Focused on a ladder debt schedule, you see that on the right-hand side and you know our next maturity doesn't come due until August of 2025. The rest of the debt as you can see is significantly back-end loaded. We get asked a lot about our debt capacity and how we think about leverage. Earlier this year, I guess with the end of last year, we put out what we believe is the prudent maximum leverage of 1.25 times debt to equity. Right now you can see we're well within that covenant at 0.8 times and well within our threshold. But to be clear, that's a maximum that I talked about, not necessarily a target. And we're always managing our liquidity levels, the anticipated cash needs, as well as receipts as well as our expenditures on the portfolio. So with that I'll stop there and hand it back to Chris.