Yes. Really good question. We’ve got two wells drilled, but not completed as you say, in the first quarter, they're right in the core of our play, and we've got about 250 sections in the area. So it's very important to us to move beyond where we are now, where we believe we've derisked 125 sections of land to fully, I guess, you'd say, gaining confidence in our production rate deliverability and the cost structure of the two wells. So, we need to get the completions done for those tactical reasons, but also for strategic reasons, it really helps us position ourselves as the leading public company in the basin and perhaps the leading company in the Pembina sub basin. So what do we need to see to get there? First of all, we needed to see a stable $40 WTI on half cycle economics, where you've got the drill costs sunk, it only takes about $40 to $45 WTI to pay these wells out in a year. And that's not necessarily on the high case curve with the 14 to 31 well that we drilled, completed and brought on production at some of the highest rates in the entire basin, around 1,300 BOEs per day. So, I think we're very, very close, Phil, to answer the question to making a call on whether we spend the additional frac costs this year to bring on those two wells by the end of the year versus holding them until around just after breakup next year. We'll make that decision in August. And if we do frac the wells, you'll see them come on roughly October. And they'll be very tactically important, but also strategically important for us as well. And we're in a place where we've got free cash flow for the full year, but it's very tight on strip. We'll be free cash positive and maintain our $300 million of liquidity, and that remains our number one priority. So, we have to see the prices are stable or that we can hedge them in, which we can talk further about. We're pretty well hedged this year. And as Rod says, we've just started to layer in some hedges for next year.