Brixmor Property Group Inc. (BRX) Q3 2013 Earnings Report, Transcript and Summary

Good morning, and welcome to the Brixmor Property Group Third Quarter 2013 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please note, this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Stacy Slater, Senior Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, operator. And thank you all for joining Brixmor's first teleconference since completing our IPO in November. With me on the call today are Michael Carroll, Chief Executive Officer; and Michael Pappagallo, President and Chief Financial Officer; as well as other key executives who will be available for Q&A. Before we begin, we would like to remind everyone that the remarks and responses to your questions that we provide today may contain forward-looking statements. These statements do not guarantee future performance and undue reliance should not be placed on them. These statements are based on current expectations of management and involve inherent risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated in any forward-looking statements, including those identified in the Risk Factors section of our as S-11 filed with the SEC and available on our website. And such factors may be updated from time to time in our SEC filings. Brixmor assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements. In today's remarks, we will refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures, reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most comparable measures calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP are available in the earnings release and supplemental disclosure on the Investor Relations portion of our website. This call is being webcast and a replay will be available on our website. At this time, it's my pleasure to introduce Mike Carroll.

Thanks, Stacy. This is a very exciting day for our company, as it marks yet another significant milestone in our recent evolution. We want to take this opportunity this morning to thank all of you for your support during the IPO process. And we look forward to our ongoing partnership and are excited about the path forward. Our investment thesis is simple. We are a team of operators and we'll build lasting shareholder value through consistent NOI growth and strong balance sheet management, prioritizing building NAV over managing FFO. Our plan generates sustained and reliable cash flow growth. And our results will be clearly indicative of our performance as NOI growth will track to our EBITDA. Our portfolio has been optimized in the private market. We have resolved or removed several impediments, including any noise around joint ventures, unresolved land banks, stalled development projects, or infrastructure improvement needs. And most importantly, we enter the public domain without a non-core pool and the need to execute dilutive dispositions. We are defined simply as a wholly owned grocery-anchored shopping center portfolio, located primarily across the top 50 markets in the U.S. Our grocers are market-leading and highly productive, providing a strong foundation for our portfolio. Today, we are free from the obstacles of the past and our portfolio is primed for growth. I would like to reiterate this morning the key components of our portfolio strategy. As we look across our national platform, we are now seeing recovery occurring in most U.S. markets. And even as there is limited quality anchor space availability, we still see little [ph] Appetite for new development. We are bullish these fundamentals will continue. And the low supply, strong demand combination creates an environment opportune for the execution of our business plan. Given this environment, our best…

Thank you, Mike. Hello, again, everyone. It's good to be back. I'm also very excited to be part of our team to help capture the significant opportunity in front of us and to increase shareholder value through a very simple and focused business plan. Our goal on disclosure is to have an easy-to-understand transparent financial information. Unfortunately, due to the timing of the IPO, this initial financial statement presentation is admittedly a bit messy. So you can get a feel for the go-forward company and results, we've provided a healthy dose of pro forma information, reflecting portfolio additions and deletions at the IPO date, the impact of proceeds raised in the offering and other adjustments for the one-time cost and fees that specifically relate to the IPO process. Our objective for this earnings release and conference call are really twofold: First, to initiate the financial and operating disclosures that we will supply the investment community to provide complete transparency; and second, to offer our initial 2014 guidance range with key assumptions. The supplemental financial report contains a host of portfolio metrics of the 522 assets in the public company, as well as information related to what we define as the same property portfolio, which is essentially all of the assets of the IPO company other than the 43 properties brought into the company at the IPO date. Among other things, we've included details on all of our properties and of our debt structure and net effective rent analysis and the components of same property NOI and other financial statement detail. One benefit of this simple and focused business plan is the ease in tracking key drivers that will influence our future financial results. Our initial estimate for FFO per common share for 2014 is between $1.80 and $1.84 per share…

[Operator Instructions] And our first question is from Christy McElroy of Citi.

Mike, regarding the $62 million of straight-line rent FAS 141 in 2014, can you break out what you expect between the 2? And what should we expect in terms of FAS 141 burnoff over the next few years?

Okay. I'd actually like let Steve Splain, Our Chief Accounting Officer, to cover that. Steve?

The FAS 141, the so-called mark-to-market lease adjustment is approximately $42 million and the straight-line rent is $20 million. So that's the breakdown there. And we would expect that the straight-line to remain relatively flat going forward. And the FAS 141 will decrease approximately $3 million to $4 million per year over the next few years.

Okay. And then in 2014, can you say what your expectations are for management fee income and also other expenses, I think, the majority of which looks like it's tax related?

Yes, we suggest that the management fee income is about $2.5 million and that relates, for the most part, the ongoing management and leasing activity for the properties that were left behind, the IPO, the so-called nonowned or nonstrategic assets. As it relates to other expenses above and beyond G&A is probably about another $5 million or so, most of that relating to state and local tax expense.

Okay. And then you mentioned occupancy expected to be up about 100 basis points year-over-year. I assumed that that's a lease rate. With the spread between the lease percentage and the commenced occupancy at about, I think, it's 190 basis points today, where would you expect that spread to be at year end '14?

It will probably be somewhere between 150 to that 190. A more normalized level as we think long-term is that 150-ish range but it has been elevated to a certain extent because of more bias towards anchor signings. So as we throughput into '14, with having additional anchor signings, it will stay somewhat elevated and then probably about '14 into '15 will revert to the more traditional 150 number.

Okay. And then in terms of your breakout of FFO on an as-adjusted basis, would you consider providing as-adjusted or sort of core FFO guidance going forward in addition to your reported FFO guidance?

I think what we'll -- to that point, Christy, I think what will happen is for us right now, FFO versus FFO and adjusted will only account for transactional activity. And considering that most of the guidance has very little transactional activity, those numbers will be the same. What we will pursue as we go forward recognizing this burn off of these accounting adjustments to make sure that the investment and research community understands how the FFO is being impacted by those accounting adjustments and probably stating the number X accounting adjustments. What we did not want to get into was to further confuse the investment community by coming up with our own version of FFO. There's a lot of confusion in terms of one-time adjustments and those things and we didn't want to add to that. So we'd rather go out with a straight definition and then provide the differences in the calculations of those items that really shouldn't be considered in using that metric. I do want to emphasize something, though, that Mike had made in his prepared remarks is that, certainly we recognize that FFO is an important metric, as is AFFO and CAD and so on. But as we think about our business plan and our strategy, I mean, our focus is about as much about longer-term value creation. So for us, it's going to be as much to do with NAV growth and along with that, the resultant cash flow growth of the business. So we're thinking very much in those terms and not trying to micromanage or manage quarterly FFO statistics.

And then just lastly, can you provide Q4 '13 FFO guidance?

Yes, I would say the best way to look at that, if you think about the third quarter, which was $0.43. As we think about the fourth quarter, we'll have some uptick. So $0.44 would probably be a good number to use when we think about the velocity of the business and the leasing and NOI growth for the quarter.

And our next question will come from Samit Parikh of ISI.

My question related to the recovery ratio. Mike, I don't know if you have this data, but sort of my guess is, is that as you continue to increase small shop occupancy, that recovery ratio is going to creep higher. At 87%, I think, you are right now with lease -- sort of the lease percentage of rent-paying occupancy about 90%. As that moves higher, how high do you think that recovery ratio can go? And I don't know if you have the data of where that recovery ratio was at sort of your prior peak occupancy for the same portfolio right now?

This is Steve Splain. We don't have that in the prior for -- the data from the prior peak. But we do expect the recovery rate to move with occupancy and slightly outpace the occupancy due to the small shop leasing. So we would approach at a stabilized occupancy of 95%, approach 90% recovery rate on all of our CAM and real estate taxes.

And our next question comes from Ki Bin Kim of SunTrust.

Just going back to your leasing. 51% on new leases, it was definitely pretty high. What should we expect on -- when you split out the rollup on leasing between renewals and new leases going forward?

Ki Bin, it's Mike Carroll. I think what you should be thinking about, we've been -- we've had good acceleration in spreads, I think, indicative of better leasing at the properties and the anchor leasing that we've done. We're thinking next year that on a blended basis, we should be in the 8% to 10% range. But I think there's a reasonable chance of out-performance there, given the supply and again the quality of leasing that we've been doing, and generally an improving market rent environment. So I think renewals will continue to be in a range that they've been in. In the new deal spreads, they're a little bit harder to quantify, but in an improving rent environment, we would think that those would continue to be north of the 20%, the 20% to 30% that they've been to be in that range some place, at the higher end of that range.

Okay. And could you help us understand, when you have tenants that come up with renewal options, are those options typically at a stipulated rate or is that a market or what does the typical renewal option look like?

It's Tim Bruce. Those are generally -- the renewal options are at a contract-rate basis, the increases vary based on the lease requirements.

Yes. So generally, I think, Ki Bin, you should be thinking about those option leases are generally, I'm going to say, in the 10% range as a bump. Sometimes, a little bit less; sometimes, a little bit more; or sometimes, there's a CPI quantifier in there but I think that 10%-ish is a good number.

And our next question is from Todd Thomas of KeyBanc Capital.

Just a couple of questions. First, looking at the composition of the same-store NOI growth in the quarter and year-to-date, the 50 to 60 basis points of growth that was attributable to redevelopment. As you think about the guidance of 3.7% to 4.1% in '14. Is that 50- to 60-basis point contribution from redevelopment consistent or do you see that increasing or decreasing?

Todd, it's hard for us to quantify that, because redevelopment ins and outs are often based on when leases start to commence, what new projects may commence that take existing space offline, et cetera. But what I would say is that, that rough range of 50 basis points plus or minus is not an unreasonable estimate in how we think about the redevelopment piece of the total NOI growth. I'm just a little hesitant in terms of really tightening that number at this point. As we get more into 2014 and projects completed and new projects commence, I probably can give you a little bit more precision on that.

Okay. And then you mentioned that demand for space is 10,000 square feet and larger is pretty strong, and rent growth in the boxes that are 35,000 square feet or greater was strongest in the quarter and it was actually lowest in the below-5,000-square-foot spaces. I just wondering, what gives you confidence that the leasing will accelerate in the small shop space like you're forecasting given that there's usually a little less lead time on those size spaces?

Right. Todd, I'll start and then I will give it to Tim for color. I think if -- really, a big part of understanding our story is the anchor leasing that's been done over the last couple of years. We've signed nearly 200 leases, many of those commenced during this quarter, many commence during the first quarter next year. And it's really important to understand that the small shops are going to follow those anchors and when those anchors get opened and are solidified, that's when we can achieve the best rate on shop space, particularly that small shop space. And so that's been the lagging of the space to date, and you've seen some acceleration as we've commenced more anchor leases and it does provide a great platform for it. And we've seen a good demand and Tim can talk about some of the demand that we're seeing in that space.

Sure. Just the follow-on leasing from all of our anchor leasing initiatives over the last couple of years has been tremendous. We have robust demand from shop space and category 10 below. In particular, most of the divisions of Senna [ph], Carter's, Petco and leased [ph] , PetSmart, just to name a few. So we continue to see that as -- on our leasing initiatives, national accounts handles all of the national tenants. The regional players do all the local leasing. And so both on a national accounts and on a local level, we see a lot of robust leasing interest in our space.

Okay. And then just one more. I know the company's strategy in the near-term, surrounds leasing and internal growth, and you mentioned, Mike, that there's no acquisitions or dispositions in guidance. So I was just curious, though, if you think about external growth, when should we expect to see any acquisitions or dispositions? I guess, when will the company consider recycling capital and making new investments?

Todd, I think what we've been saying is we did use this time as a private company to shed the portfolio of non-core assets. Everything that we have in the portfolio today, we feel like we have a plan that we can extract growth and grow NOI at those properties. And as we start to move through this year and into next year and we've harvested and capitalized that growth, as we start to growth rates flatten out, at that point, I think we'll be looking to do some recycling. But as we sit here today, it really is -- it's more about the operations of those properties in an environment where we've got recovery now really across the U.S. We just don't feel like before taking advantage of that growth that it would be prudent to be deep into a recycling strategy.

[Operator Instructions] I am showing no additional questions. I'd like to turn the conference back over to Mike Carroll for any closing remarks.

Thank you. Again, I can't express enough how thrilled we are to have completed this phase of our journey. Our team is honored to be back in the public markets. We recognize that it's also a great responsibility. This team here is very committed, they're focused. And we look forward to reporting our progress to you in our quarters to come. Thank you very much.

The conference is now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.