Good afternoon. And welcome to the Bruker Corporation Third Quarter 2021 Earnings Conference Call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions] After today’s presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. [Operator Instructions] Please also this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Miroslava Minkova. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Gary. Good afternoon. I would like to welcome everyone to Bruker’s third quarter 2021 earnings conference call. My name is Miroslava Minkova, Senior Director of Investor Relations and Corporate Development at Bruker Corporation. Joining me on today’s call are Frank Laukien, our President and CEO; and Gerald Herman, our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. In addition to the earnings release we issued earlier today, during today’s conference call, we will be referencing a slide presentation. The PDF of this presentation can be downloaded from the Latest Results section on Bruker’s Investor Relations website. During today’s call, we will be highlighting non-GAAP financial information. Reconciliations of our non-GAAP to GAAP financial measures are included in our earnings release and are posted on our website at ir.bruker.com. Before we begin, I would like to reference Bruker’s Safe Harbor statement, which I show on slide two. During the course of this conference call, we will make forward-looking statements regarding future events, and the financial and operational performance of the company that involve risks and uncertainties, including those related to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the spread of the Delta variant, as well as ongoing supply chain challenges, global logistics and inflationary risk. The company’s actual results may differ materially from such statements. Factors that might cause such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in today’s earnings release and in our Form 10-K as updated by our other SEC filings, which are available on our website and on the SEC’s website. Also note that the following information is related to current business conditions and to our outlook as of today, November 1, 2021. We do not intend to update our forward-looking statements based on new information, future events or for other reasons prior to the release of our fourth quarter 2021 financial results expected in February 2022. Therefore, you should not rely on these forward-looking statements as representing our views or outlook as of any date subsequent to today. We will begin today’s call with Frank providing a summary. Gerald will then cover the financials for the third quarter in more detail. Now, I would like to turn the call over to Bruker’s CEO, Frank Laukien.

Thank you, Miroslava. As you may know, this will be Miroslava’s last earnings call with us. Gerald and I would like to thank her for her successful work in Investor Relations and Corporate Development over the last five years and we wish her the best going forward. Now, good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us on today’s earnings call. As you can see on slide four, Bruker delivered another excellent quarter with sustained momentum in bookings, revenues, margin improvement, and EPS growth. Our teams continued to innovate and to execute very well, managing through well publicized supply chain challenges. I am confident that Bruker is now well on track for excellent financial and operational progress in 2021. For the third quarter of 2021, Bruker’s revenues increased 19.1% year-over-year to $609 million. On an organic basis, revenues increased 17.8% year-over-year, which included 16.8% organic growth in the Bruker Scientific Instruments Groups and 29.3% at BEST, net of intercompany eliminations. Our third quarter 2021, non-GAAP gross margins expanded 210 basis points year-over-year to 51.7%, while our non-GAAP operating margin reached 20.6%, an improvement of 200 bps over 18.6% in the third quarter of 2020. In the third quarter of 2021, Bruker reported GAAP diluted EPS of $0.57, compared to $0.35 reported in the prior year period. On a non-GAAP basis, the third quarter of 2021 diluted EPS were $0.63, an increase of 50% from $0.42 in the third quarter of 2020 and Q3 of 2021 included a tax benefit of approximately $0.06 on certain discrete items, as Gerald will explain later. In summary, it was an excellent third quarter with strong revenue growth, operating leverage, and favorable tax performance, which all dropped through to the bottom line, even as we continue to step up our Project Accelerate 2.0 and operational…

Thank you, Frank, and thank you everyone for joining us today. I am pleased to review Bruker’s third quarter and year-to-date 2021 financial highlights, starting on slide 11. Bruker’s revenue increased 19.1% to approximately $609 million in the third quarter of 2021, which includes an organic revenue increase of 17.8% year-over-year. We reported GAAP EPS of $0.57 per share, compared to $0.35 in the third quarter of 2020. On a non-GAAP basis, third quarter 2021 EPS was $0.63 per share, an increase of 50%, compared to $0.42 in the third quarter of 2020. Our third quarter 2021 non-GAAP operating income grew 32.1% from a still somewhat softer comparison in the third quarter of 2020 when our recovery from the pandemic began. Third quarter 2021 non-GAAP operating margin expanded 200 basis points year-over-year to 20.6%, driven by our strong revenue and volume growth. These results also include continued investments in our Project Accelerate 2.0 initiatives and operational excellence programs. Our teams executed very well in the third quarter, handling significantly higher volume, despite supply chain shortages and logistics delays that may ultimately result in some shipments slipping into 2022. But thus far, these issues have been well managed, as we operate with increased buffer inventories and make longer term vendor commitments with down payments to protect our revenue growth and P&L. We finished the third quarter with cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments of approximately $670 million. During the quarter, we used cash to fund strategic investments in our business, two small acquisitions in the NANO Group and our dividend program. In May of 2021, our Board approved a new two-year share repurchase authorization of up to $500 million, valid until May 2023. There were no share repurchases under the program in the third quarter of 2021. Year-to-date, our share repurchases…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Puneet Souda with SVB Leerink. Please go ahead.

Yeah. Hi, Frank. Thanks for taking the question and congrats on the quarter, and Miroslava, really great working with you, really best wishes for the next role. So, Frank, my first question is really on the guide. There’s a beat in the quarter here, obviously, great to see that, but when we put that in, obviously, mid-point, we’re already reaching to the mid-point of the organic guidance range versus what we were modeling. So I am just trying to understand, on one hand, there is a backdrop of the strong quarter you had. The demand is strong. You highlighted more than 20% bookings growth year-to-date. You’re getting another gigahertz placement. MALDI Biotyper is strong here. So, the question is really the conservatism, is it coming from supply chain mostly or is it a softer budget flush, just if you could walk us through the components here, and on the supply chain side, if you could just maybe help us understand, is it worse than what you had highlighted in the second quarter, just wanted to get a sense of where things stand today?

Yeah. Hi, Puneet. So the -- I think the guide is appropriate. I mean, obviously, we took up our guidance for the full year very significantly and are seeing terrific improvements just about in every category throughout the -- for the full year, and so that’s really what we’re driving and managing at, right? Gerald explained some of it already. We had the sort of $15 million that we thought would end up in Q4 already, coming into Q3, and we have an $8 million headwind from COVID testing in Q4 compared to year-over-year. And then we’re just really very, very happy with how our year is shaping up. Obviously, looking at the mid-point, I realize that we always give a range at 17% organic growth and 19 a -- big step-up in margins more than 50% EPS growth. I think that’s just going to be a perfect ending to the year. And indeed, I think, supply chain to your question, it’s no dramatic shift, but they’re pervasive. They’re everywhere. Our teams are working very, very hard, very successfully so far, and some of our delivery times have become longer and that’s how we’re quoting systems to customers and that gets accepted because I think they’re seeing it everywhere. So most things that come in now is orders. I mean almost all of that would go into Q1 or Q2 or even later of next year. So, it’s no dramatic changes, but on the other hand, we’re just -- our Q3 was, if you like, somewhat better than we had even expected, and the full-year growth rate is -- and all the other metrics I think are terrific. So we’re looking forward to entering 2022, then also with rather strong and flexible backlog, and hopefully continued momentum. Obviously, we will comment on that when we report Q4 sometime in February of next year.

Okay. That’s helpful. And in terms of inflation, in terms of cost increases from suppliers, could you just update us on your ability to potentially push that to the customers and maybe just give us a sense of what you’re seeing out there in terms of inflationary sort of expectations that are, obviously, happening with a number of companies, but just wanted to get your view since Bruker has significant capital equipment?

Right. I mean, inflationary pressure is clearly out there and it’s also rather pervasive. I mean in many areas, we have long-term contracts, many areas we have very, very good vendor relationships and significant influence. We’re doing redesign by cost in many areas -- we’re enhance -- we are making significant enhancements in productivity, but the inflationary pressures are still there, and of course, greater than certainly at any time in the last decade. So, we’re looking at that proactively, of course, also in our pricing, this pricing and price increases are something that will be higher than in other years. That’s clear. But I will also say that our number one priority at Bruker is customer satisfaction, long-term customer satisfaction. So, we’re not going to try to pass on every price or logistics spike onto our customers, but we will also cushion some of that for them and I think that’s a good long-term customer strategy that gets honored by demand and by long-term customer loyalty. So, I am not trying to suggest that all short-term inflationary pressures or spikes will be simply passed on, but we have enough other things in the pipeline, so that I am quite confident that we’re -- we will manage differently, but we’ll manage well in this new environment with more to be seen, and obviously when we give guidance for 2022. So far it has, obviously with terrific 350 bps or more non-operating margin expansion and gross margin expansion, it’s -- so far we’re doing extremely well in that environment.

Got it. Okay. And last one for me is really…

I think we had three questions, so I think we need to also leave some time for other questions, because we usually have one or two. I am sorry, Puneet.

The next question is from Derik De Bruin with Bank of America. Please go ahead.

Hi. Thanks for taking the question. This is Mike Ryskin on for Derik. I want to talk briefly about the NSF orders you called out. We talked about it in the past, but I want to get an update of your thoughts on when this could start contributing to revenues? Could this be 2022 or closer to 2023 or beyond? And just at a high level, if you could provide us an update on the ultra-high field order book and how we should think about the cadence of some of those deliveries in 2022?

Yeah. Understood. So, no, these NSF orders, these NAN orders will certainly not be delivered in 2022, that goes into 2023 and beyond, I don’t have the exact target quarter, but our order book for ultra-high field gigahertz class NMR is at least two years out. I don’t have the exact numbers right now and so these orders. It used to be a delivery times of four years to five years. They’ve certainly come down to three years more typically or three years or less. And we’ve made good progress this year in 2022 and, sorry, in 2021, and we expect to place one more, well, we’ve placed already, but we hope to have in revenue from one more system in the fourth quarter. So I am not going to comment on 2022 expectations, but the order book is pretty much full for the next two years, and more demand, hopefully, will come up during that time period.

Okay. Great. I appreciate that. And then if I can get a follow-up on some of the margin profile and sort of the flow-through, really strong beat, both on gross margin and operating in the third quarter. I am just wondering if you could parse that apart sort of what was the contribution or the benefit from the $15 million pull forward, I imagine that probably came through at a pretty nice margin? And then the supply chain issues you talked about, potentially affecting some delays into 2022, if you could just quantify that? Thanks.

Well, I will take that one. It’s Gerald. So relative to the performance on the margin side, at the operating margin and gross margin performance, as I’ve said on other calls, when we get this level of revenue growth and the volume, we tend to see very good operating margin performance. It drops down to our bottom line more quickly. That’s driven, in this particular case, not only by good strong performance in our BioSpin group, which this event of $15 million certainly helped that situation. But furthermore, we’ve seen very good strong demand from a revenue perspective in the third quarter in a number of different market segments. It’s true for our industrial, industrial research or academic markets or biopharma markets, applied markets, semi-metrology as well. So, all of those are carrying pretty solid margin performance at the gross margin line. So generally speaking, that helps significantly and that’s what you see here. I might also mention, you asked about items that might fall into 2022. We won’t comment specifically on that, but with the fact that we have logistics delays, we have supply chain challenges, with Bruker, the way this works is, particularly for large high value pieces of equipment. We really only need one or two units to fall naturally into -- be delayed for some reason either a customer acceptance issues or just facilities not being ready. In those cases, we ultimately -- it just falls into the next quarter. So I think we will see some of that, particularly with some logistics delays and that’s probably the high level view from my perspective on it.

And as we’ve all taken into account in the guidance…

Yeah.

… for the full year and the implied guidance or color for the fourth quarter, of course.

Great. Thanks so much and congrats Miroslava.

Thank you.

Thank you.

The next question is from Tycho Peterson with JPMorgan. Please go ahead.

Hey. This is Rachel Vatnsdal in for Tycho. Thanks for taking the question. So first up on China, can you guys just walk us through your expectations on the recent procurement initiatives that seem to emphasize local players in the market and also do you see any risk since Bruker doesn’t manufacture in the region?

Right. Yeah. I mean, in most of the product areas where we are active, we are really very, very differentiated and unique and very often globally and including even in China. So it’s not that our products are easily displaced by something that’s made locally. I mean we’re aware of that. We see those preferences for sure and we have really excellent applications and sales and service support in China. So, Chinese customers generally are very satisfied with the products and the support that they’re getting from Bruker. And very often, our products are -- almost always our products are just very differentiated. I think I will leave it at that, but we’re well aware of of these political tendencies. They do not affect us primarily. They do not affect us all that strongly.

Understood. And then, last one from me. So last quarter, you guys flagged some broad weakness in Japan and you called it out a little bit on this call as well. So can you just give us an update about the demand trends you’re seeing in the region and outlook for 4Q as well?

Did you say Japan, was that the question?

Yeah. Yeah.

Yes. Japan.

Yeah. I believe Japan had been weak and I think Japan has seen somewhat better bookings than there had been. I am aware of from the NMR side, that they had been or some sort of a special supplementary budget and we have seen and I think are also expecting some decent bookings in Japan, because some extra monies have become available after the Olympics. But I have to say, I’d rather get another quarter of visibility into Japan orders before I comment. Right now I don’t really have any -- there’s -- after a slow start for most of the year, there are now some signs of hope, but I wouldn’t call it data yet, let us comment more after the fourth quarter.

Great. Thanks for taking my questions.

Sure.

Sure.

The next question is from Dan Arias with Stifel. Please go ahead.

Good afternoon, guys. Thanks for the questions. Frank, anything to add to the comment that industrial research is a bit beyond where you were thinking for the quarter, was that focused on a particular geography or application or was it just sort of across the Board?

It’s really quite broad and even in our more industrial and applied businesses like the molecular spectroscopy or X-ray tools or other surface tools, surface analysis tools. It’s particularly strong, of course, in advanced packaging and semiconductor that serves broadly the microelectronics industry. So chip scarcities in a way are also good for Bruker, because they drive demand and investment. Of course, there’s, a lot of political factors or geopolitical factors of why investment in that space is likely to be driven by demand trends, but also by trends towards more geopolitical independence in that area in particular. But in general, in industrial and applied markets have really been just very strong and almost without exception. So, for very many of our product lines, our core products, we really have continued innovation. We work on not only on productivity but also on performance on next-generation product line refresh. So very often we’ve been in -- we found ourselves to be in a very good competitive position. So also our core businesses have done really quite well in bookings and now also in revenue. So it’s pretty broad-based.

Yeah. Okay. Thanks. Maybe just a follow-up on BioSpin, I was wondering whether you could just sort of update us on the color that you might have on lead times and BioSpin, and just where things fit when it comes to installation timing for some of the big ticket items. I mean how should we think about the time lines there relative to some of the earlier days in the pandemic and maybe, overall, how are you finding that through the day?

Those -- that’s a good question. And those delays were maybe we couldn’t access a lab or couldn’t go to a certain country. There still are some countries, but in the bigger -- it’s obviously gotten better. And on the other hand, some countries in Asia-Pacific or Australia and New Zealand are still difficult to access. It’s getting better, but it’s -- and we’re working in this new -- obviously, a lot more is done by virtual effect. And so we’re dealing -- it’s an improving situation and we have new tools and methods that work reasonably well that have allowed us to show this strong growth, obviously, despite some remaining restrictions. In Western Europe and North America, these things are now obviously in much better shape, but there are still parts of the world where we can ship, we can deliver, we can get revenue, but we’re doing it differently. So it’s improving and we have better processes. We really do some very complicated installations these days and customer training via augmented virtual reality and things like that. It’s actually quite remarkable how much progress we have been making. So it’s not holding us back as you can see from the results and from the guidance.

Okay. Thanks very much.

Sure.

The next question is from Patrick Donnelly with Citi. Please go ahead.

Hi. Thank you for taking my question. This is Leslie Spire [ph] on for Patrick Donnelly. I was wondering if you guys could talk a little bit about the European recovery that you’re seeing. I know we’ve talked about China, but I am curious about Europe and those end markets as well. Thank you.

Sure. There’s certainly different timing. China recovered first, already began to recover already in late Q2 of last year. Europe began to recover earlier than the U.S. and Europe was already getting strong in Q3 and Q4 of last year in terms of bookings. And then it took a while for the U.S., especially academic and government spending to really get going, but right now, that’s the strongest growth driver in terms of bookings for sure. So Europe, yeah, I don’t know that there’s much more to say. European revenue growth was good. European bookings growth in the third quarter year-over-year, a little bit weaker, but really because Q3 of last year wasn’t so bad and there were some sizable proteomics initiatives in Germany and some other countries last year. So, yes, China first, Europe second, Americas, and well, I should say North America, U.S. third with Japan and some parts of the rest of the world only really now, hopefully, beginning to recover. I hope that helps you.

Great. Thank you. That helps.

The next question is from Sung Ji Nam with BTIG. Please go ahead.

Hi. Thanks for taking my questions and I would like to add thanks to Miroslava as well for all your help. Just two quick ones, one is, sorry, if I missed it, but Frank, what percentage of your install the MALDI Biotyper installed base in Europe currently has adopted the Sepsitype workflow?

Right. No. We didn’t -- I don’t think I have that number at my fingertips. It is not…

Okay.

Yeah. It’s not -- so, first of all, it’s only for clinical, right? It’s not sepsis inherently the clinical, about two-thirds of our multi- Biotyper worldwide are clinical, one-third are non-clinical. So they would never have it. In Europe, there has been adaptation but low reimbursement. The reimbursement environment for the Sepsityper type capability in the U.S. is much, much stronger in the U.S. So we think it’s a much bigger driver in the in the U.S., and we are indeed seeing that. I do not -- I cannot answer your specific question because I do not have that number.

No worry. Thank you. And then just curious about your molecular diagnostics business, such as Hain, where you might be seeing growth kind of beyond the COVID testing opportunity? Thank you.

Well, I would say, it’s mostly a recovery of their TB, their tuberculosis, PCR testing, including the liquid array, PCR multiplexing, that looks at many, many different resistance patterns. For a while, that was -- that clearly did play and probably still continues to play second fiddle to COVID testing, but it is now coming back like so many other diagnostic procedures, it is recovering and that we have some strong products there that obviously were overshadowed by COVID testing. So, mostly in tuberculosis testing, and as you know, we’re focusing on Europe, Africa and India in those markets. This is not something we sell in the Americas or in Japan or China. So it has regional specializations.

Great. Thank you so much.

The next question is from Josh Waldman with Cleveland Research. Please go ahead.

Hey. Thanks for taking my questions. Frank, I think, I heard you comment orders were up 20% year-to-date, but wondered if you could comment on order growth here in the third quarter overall? And then I believe the longer-term growth outlook you laid out back at the analyst meeting, incorporate something like 8% to 10% annual organic growth through 2024. Frank or Gerald, I wonder if you could provide any context on how we should be thinking about 2022. I guess, given the comp is obviously more difficult, should we be assuming something below that for next year?

So, the -- Josh, a lot of questions embedded here. I think Gerald will start real quick with the BSI…

Yeah.

… year-to-date or Q3…

I think your question…

...order bookings, right, they were very similar, right, around 20%...

Yeah.

Right?

Actually, it’s over 20% order bookings growth for BSI Groups for the third quarter and actually for the full year-to-date nine months.

And those were organic numbers, right?

Those are organic bookings performance. Yeah. It’s very strong actually.

Was the third quarter stronger than year-to-date trends?

Very similar

Similar, I’d say. Yeah.

But in the third quarter, keep in mind that we got the two 1.1 gigahertz orders in the third quarter from this NAND. They both came in in the third quarter, if I recall correctly. So, yes, so that was a bit of a step-up. But if you disregard, well, I mean, they’re very nice orders, obviously. But the trends have been very similar and very strong for the first three quarters. I wouldn’t read anything into that. So year-to-date, 20% and that’s very close to the quarterly. That average over three quarters is also close to the quarter…

And…

… BSI growth.

I was just going to add one other thing, Josh.

Yeah.

It’s across all the groups, so each of those groups…

Okay.

… is performing very well on the order bookings side.

Correct.

So that’s important. It’s not simply one group. We’re firing on those cylinders. I am talking about the groups not the...

BSI Groups. Yeah.

The BSI Groups

And I am sorry, some of your other questions, I mean, we’re not going to go into 2022, trying to forecast 2022. But what were some of the other elements of your question, Josh, if you could repeat -- remind us, please?

Yeah. More just kind of context on 2022 in light of the longer term guide, obviously, the comps step up significantly, should we automatically be assuming something below that, well…

I mean, on -- just at a very high level, we obviously, in June, as you recall, we said our 2024 multiyear targets, right? And I mean, we’re clearly derisking that with a strong of 2021, if it comes out near our guidance, right? And so this year is sort of not only a recovery, but this year is really a big step up in many aspects, which is wonderful. So as you know, we will give 2022 guidance and outlook in February when we report the fourth quarter and have a better overall picture. So that will -- 2021 strong, but really also a very good step-up in derisking the targets that we had given, we have great momentum.

Got it. Thanks guys.

Sure.

Thank you.

The next question is from Jack Meehan with Nephron Research. Please go ahead.

Thanks. Good afternoon. Was wondering if you could give some more color on timsTOF performance in the quarter, how uptake is in terms of shipments and/or maybe just even more broadly, just how the performance of that -- of the timsTOF did in the quarter relative to CALID overall would be helpful?

Yeah. So, Jack, on the -- so shipments/revenue for timsTOF have been strong all year and the third quarter was no exception, also beginning to already see some bookings for the new timsTOF SCP. In addition, which is really an additional growth driver, the single-cell proteomic system that we launched on June 1st, even though it’s essentially $1 million system, there were some budgets that were that people simply found, because they thought they needed to have that unique capability for unbiased proteomics as an additional quantitative special biology technology. So quite encouraged by the early orders of these more expensive systems and while the timsTof Pro and now the timsTOF Pro 2 that we’re shipping now has really been growing very nicely, all three quarters, including the third quarter, nice revenue, nice shipments. And I will just put out the teaser that tomorrow morning, we will have our ASMS press release, a lot of that will relate to new -- we just introduced the two systems. So we’re not launching systems tomorrow. We introduced them at the original ASMS timing of June, early June. And but a lot of very significant further workflow and software and other capability enhancements developed by ourselves and very often by our key customers, but being beneficial also for other customers. So I think we will have some exciting proteomics and other mass spec news tomorrow morning and then we have an 11 o’clock press release for -- that’s more scientifically oriented. We’re not going to talk about EPS, but happy to talk about protein identifications and single cell proteomics tomorrow, but it’s doing very well. And the -- I mean the interest by more-and-more key opinion leaders, but also not only key opinion leaders, also what I would say, the early majority is really very positive and it’s just a new category. There’s 40 proteomics that’s CCS or collision cross-section enabled is a new take on the field and it has so many advantages when you can do that at scale and we will just have so many examples of that tomorrow again.

Great. Looking forward to it. I also just had 1 clarification, the $15 million related to paperwork. Can you just elaborate on that? So these sales were expected in the fourth quarter pulled forward you were able to generate in the third quarter? Is that the idea?

The paperwork stuff was about $10 million of the $15 million. We’re about $15 million that we thought would go into Q4 ended up already coming through in Q3, wonderful. About $10 million of that was China paperwork related and it wasn’t the tax or import certificate. It was something very NMR specific about some samples that we need for NMR as qualifier and calibration samples and that had held up things that we thought would get delayed into Q4 and then they ended up not getting delayed. So I wouldn’t -- it was very Bruker and very NMR specific. I wouldn’t read anything into that on to other parts of the business or other companies. But, so $15 million came in, was not delayed, I should say, which is great and of that $10 million was paperwork China NMR related but very Bruker specific, very NMR specific.

Got it. And sorry, just to follow-up, does your fourth quarter guidance have any additional pressure related to any one-off things that we should know about?

Well, we have 1 gigahertz, I think, a 1.0 gigahertz system in Europe in our forecast. But we have guided in a way that, I mean, that has a high chance of happening, but even if it doesn’t, that don’t you worry about that. We think we’ve got that covered. I mean, we look at some contingency plans, if not A, then B or C. So I wouldn’t -- there’s nothing worth pointing out unless something -- some major shutdown in December occurs because of some new variants or so. But I think we’ve been good at taking things into account. I think we’re in good shape to meet our implied guidance for Q4 and our full year guidance.

Thank you.

The next question is from Matt Sykes with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Oh! Hi. Thanks for taking my question and squeezing me in. I will just leave it to one question. I just wanted to go back to MALDI Biotyper installed base, that chart that you had on slide eight, where you show the Americas versus Europe. Is there any obstacles within the U.S. market that would prevent you from getting to what the European installed base looks like and what impact do you think that would have on just your consumables revenue stream and overall recurring revenue if you were to grow it to a European size installed base?

Okay. So we’ve been a good -- very good question. I think we have the opportunity for substantial growth in the Americas. I wouldn’t say that Americas -- well, first of all, this is America. So maybe 75% to 80% of the 1,020 systems you see here would be U.S. The rest is Latin America and Canada and Mexico. So there’s a lot -- there’s even more growth potential in the U.S. The U.S. has been slower to adopt than Europe, that’s for sure. So we think the U.S. could be a pretty sustainable part of the -- for the MALDI Biotyper growth. Two, what’s implied in your question, which is actually quite insightful. The U.S. consumables pull-through and reimbursement for assays is quite a bit better than in Europe. So I -- on average systems in the U.S. pull-through more long-term revenue than in Europe. So that would be even quite beneficial and maybe that’s what you were aiming for with that question. As we -- as the U.S. probably will grow faster than Europe in MALDI Biotyper systems installations, we expect an even better consumables pull-through in the U.S. than in Europe or in APAC.

Great. Thank you very much, guys. Appreciate it.

This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Miroslava Minkova for any closing remarks.

Thank you for joining us today. If you wish to join us at our ASMS 2021 Scientific Press Conference tomorrow at 11 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time and if you have not yet received an invite, please send a note to our Investor Relations inbox, investor.relations@bruker.com. During the fourth quarter, Bruker will participate in the 2021 Jefferies London Healthcare Conference. Bruker will also attend the JPMorgan Healthcare Conference in San Francisco in early January. Bruker’s leadership team looks forward to meeting you at an event or speaking with you directly during the quarter. Thank you all for your support of Bruker over the past five years. It’s been a great pleasure working with you all. Have a nice evening.

The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today’s presentation. You may now disconnect.