Good afternoon. My name is Emma, and I will be your conference operator today. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speakers’ remarks there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Thank you. I will now turn the call over to the Box team.

Good afternoon, and welcome to Box's Second Quarter Fiscal Year '24 Earnings Conference Call. I'm Cynthia Hiponia, Vice President, Investor Relations. On the call today, we have Aaron Levie, Box Co-Founder and CEO; and Dylan Smith, Box Co-Founder and CFO. Following our prepared remarks, we will take your questions. Today's call is being webcast and will also be available for replay on our IR website at box.com/investors. Our webcast will be audio. However, supplemental slides are now available for download from our website. We'll also post the highlights of today's call on the X platform handle at Box Inc. IR. On this call, we will be making forward-looking statements, including our third quarter and full year fiscal 2024 financial guidance and our expectations regarding our financial performance for fiscal 2024 and future periods, including our free cash flow, gross margins, operating margins, operating leverage, future profitability, net retention rates, remaining performance applications, revenue and billings and the impact of foreign currency exchange rates and our expectations regarding the size of our market opportunity, our planned investments, future product offerings and growth strategies; our ability to achieve our revenue, operating margins and other operating model targets, the timing and market adoption of and benefits from our new products, pricing models and partnerships; the timing of our public cloud migration efforts, our ability to address enterprise challenges and deliver cost savings for our customers, the impact of the macro environment on our business and operating results and our capital allocation strategies, including potential repurchase of our common stock. These statements reflect our best judgment based on factors currently known to us, and actual events or results may differ materially. Please refer to our earnings press release filed today and the risk factors and documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including our most recent quarterly report on Form 10-Q for information on the risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from statements made on this earnings call. These forward-looking statements are being made today as of August 29, 2023, and we disclaim any obligation to update or revise them should they change or cease to be up to date. In addition, during today's call, we will discuss non-GAAP financial measures. These non-GAAP financial measures should be considered in addition to, not as a substitute for or in isolation from our GAAP results. You can find additional disclosures regarding these non-GAAP measures, including reconciliations with comparable GAAP results in our earnings press release and in the related supplemental slides, which can be found on the IR page of our website. Unless otherwise indicated, all references to financial measures are on a non-GAAP basis. With that, let me hand the call over to Aaron.

Thank you, Cynthia, and thanks, everyone, for joining us today. In Q2, we delivered revenue growth of 6% year-over-year or 9% in constant currency. Our 25% operating margins were up 310 basis points from a year ago, reflecting our operational discipline and a continued challenging macro environment. Over the last few months, I have spoken with customers across nearly every sized business, geography and industry. While customers are still facing various macro pressures that impact IT spend and see growth in the near term, Box is still being prioritized in the areas where our unique value proposition is aligned with the IT decisions they are making in the near and long term around digital imperatives and the role of AI. In my conversations with CIOs, it's clear that they're looking to advance their digital strategies to help drive growth in their business, improve productivity across their organization, leverage integrated platforms that can provide them more value and keep their enterprises secure from threats. At the same time, they have more content than ever before and are looking to leverage AI to accelerate their business processes and how they work. The Box Content Cloud is in a unique position to enable enterprises to drive productivity across the business, simplify IT environments and protect an enterprise's most important data. And with our platform-neutral approach to AI, we're bringing the full range of large language models to enable customers to transform how they work with their data in the cloud. Recent customer wins in Q2 that validate our strategy is working and that we are aligned to the key trends facing our customers include a federal institutional system who purchased Box with a 6-figure deal to enable the organization to move to the cloud for secured document collaboration and workflow. With Box, they…

Thanks, Aaron. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us. In Q2, our balanced business model allowed us to invest in profitable growth while continuing to optimize our underlying cost structure. Revenue landed in line with our guidance, and we delivered operating margin and EPS above our guidance despite a challenging macroeconomic environment. We are also pleased to have delivered innovation across our product portfolio, generated significant operating leverage and continued our prudent return of capital to our shareholders. In Q2, we generated revenue of $261 million, up 6% year-over-year and representing 9% year-over-year growth on a constant currency basis. We now have nearly 1,700 total customers paying us more than $100,000 annually, an increase of 11% year-over-year. Our suites attach rate of 78% in large Q2 deals, a notable improvement from 72% in the year ago period demonstrates the value that our Content Cloud platform is delivering to our large customers. Suites customers now account for 48% of our revenue, up 20% from 40% of revenue a year ago and after introducing suites just 4 years ago. Our suites value proposition continues to resonate with our customers in this dynamic environment enabling them to transform, simplify and secure their IT environments. We ended Q2 with remaining performance obligations, or RPO, of $1.1 billion, an 8% year-over-year increase or 11% growth on a constant currency basis. We expect to recognize roughly 60% of our RPO over the next 12 months. Q2 billings of $233 million were down 1% year-over-year and up 1% on a constant currency basis. As anticipated, our Q2 billings result was impacted by a particularly high volume of early renewals in Q1. Q2 billings were also impacted by incremental FX headwinds from the U.S. dollar to Japanese yen exchange rate of approximately $2 million or 100…

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Brian Peterson with Raymond James. Your line is open.

Hi, thanks for taking the questions. So Aaron, I just wanted to double down on the cost savings component. I know that's come up in the past as a value proposition to the platform. As customers may not be looking to expand seats as quickly, are they delaying cost savings for themselves? Or is there a functionality dynamic there? I just maybe love to understand a little bit on the cost side and if that has any correlation to what you guys are seeing on the seat side. So is that the equation?

Yes. So that message is still resonating and it doesn't always lead to an upsell only, because it might be that the customer already has licenses for the capabilities that would drive cost savings. So if you think about a customer that has Enterprise Plus as an example, they have access to Box Sign, Box Shield, Box Governance, certain platform utilization abilities. And so that is -- when we talk about cost savings, that platform approach allows customers to go retire up to maybe half a dozen other systems or a dozen other systems depending on the environment. But they might be fully licensed for that within the Enterprise Plus plan that they have. So that message and that momentum is alive and well, and I'm -- almost every customer I'm talking to is retiring something beyond just the kind of core legacy storage infrastructure. They're looking at Box Sign for something. They're looking at Box Canvas for their white boarding solution. So that's going great. But you also still need that additional seat dynamic to really drive the net retention rate historically. And so that's maybe the part that's more muted, but overall, the momentum around data security, cost consolidation by leveraging the full breadth of the Box platform. And then obviously, AI have provided good counterbalances to some of the macro headwinds that we've seen.

Yes. And just to put a finer point on that, that's why even in this challenging and pretty heavily scrutinized IT budget environment, we are still seeing healthy adoption of our suites and Enterprise Plus offerings as that value proposition really is resonating, so that is showing continued momentum in order to bring in these capabilities that do help bring in the -- enable the cost savings even for customers, who aren't on Enterprise Plus or warrant previously, but it really is the seat growth that has been more impacted as, in many cases, you don't necessarily need to expand the number of seats in order to capture those cost consolidation opportunities as a customer.

Got it. That makes sense. And Dylan, maybe a follow-up for you. Just understanding on the second half outlook. I know you mentioned some changing dynamics on the seat expansion side. I'd love to understand qualitatively, what did you change for the second-half outlook in the new guidance versus the old guidance? Thanks guys.

Sure. So at a high level, I would say that this guidance takes into account certainly, the Q2 results and the continued macroeconomic challenges, including all the dynamics that go into the net retention rate and the pressure on seat count. So while our customers are still dealing with macroeconomic challenges and scrutinizing that IT spend, as we mentioned, we are encouraged by the stabilization that we're now seeing in the demand environment and we're also starting to see pipeline building at healthier levels than earlier in the year, but that typically takes several quarters to close given our enterprise sales cycles. So I would say big picture, it's primarily driven by the actual and expected business performance due to macroeconomic impacts. We've seen year-to-date, which also includes a little bit of a reduction in our professional services, Box consulting expectations as we noted.

Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line Josh Baer with Morgan Stanley. Your line is open.

Great. Thank you for the question. Wanted to dig in a little bit more on the lower seat growth. Just wondering if it's widespread, if it's across both SMB and enterprise, anything to note on geographies? And then I have a follow-up.

Yes. I think as we noted in the last call, while the general macro headwind, I think, is -- does affect companies across a range of sizes and geographies. I think there's incremental pronounced impact in some of the smaller business customers, some of the international non-Japan segments where we haven't necessarily had as strong of an engine in the past. And so that's probably where we see a little bit of incremental, kind of, headwind relative to other areas, but very kind of similar to the call we had in the last quarter.

Great. Thanks, Aaron. And then I was hoping you could sort of walk through month-to-month on linearity from May to June to July and then into August. Just wondering how the seat contraction dynamic has trended month-to-month? Thank you.

Sure. I would say that in terms of the overall seasonality, I didn't see anything too different from what we typically see in a quarter. So we do see kind of back end loaded bookings, but that's pretty standard for us in pretty much any environment. And then as mentioned, kind of expecting to see more of the same based on how the current quarter is shaping up and as noted, we are seeing stabilization in that demand environment. So that kind of linearity has been fairly consistent.

And yes, the only thing I would note is just more of the same being just from a linearity standpoint.

Yes, from a linearity standpoint, correct.

Okay, got it. Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Chad Bennett with Craig-Hallum. Your line is open.

Great. So just thinking about kind of the conditions and headwinds you're seeing right now, both macro and otherwise, and it seems like rightfully so, you kind of assume the conditions will persist in the second-half of the year and net retention and churn will remain relatively consistent. As we head into next year, and I know you talked about the free cash flow revenue growth formula kind of even in the low-30s. But if the kind of macro persists and the seat headwinds persist, is there a plan or potentially an alternative to even accelerate operating margin leverage more I don't know if that's in the form of cost actions or obviously, you're seeing some gross margin improvement with the move to the cloud here. Any commentary there?

Yes. I mean what I would say is certainly the way that we ultimately set the plan, and we'll share more as that gets closer to the new year very much will be dependent on the demand signals we're seeing in the environment our confidence in our ability to drive growth, what the macroeconomic environment is looking at and that most notably, kind of impacts our overall sales and marketing levels of investment. So that's what I would describe as the biggest variable in the model, and certainly, that could create some additional operating margin expansion if we decide to take a more prudent approach to those investments. And then secondly, the big area, and you noted it, that would call out as an area for an accelerated level of margin expansion is on the gross margin line especially, because we'll more fully realize the benefits of the public cloud migration that we're wrapping up this year.

Yes. And I'll just build on that. I think I think while we do see headwinds from a macro standpoint, as Dylan called out, healthy pipeline build, the customer conversations we're having, I think, would definitely lead us to still making sure we're driving the top line growth side. So as we just think about these toggles, whether it's our product road map, the strength of our suite offering the momentum we're seeing as a result of the AI conversations that are albeit early, I think we're certainly much more focused on going into next year keeping a healthy level of driving demand. So I would just make sure that we're thoughtful about that.

Okay. And then just maybe a quick follow-up. So just in terms of -- we've had a lot of transition or cross-sell upsell to enterprise plus it's now kind of approaching the majority, almost 50% of revenue. I think it's seen a huge improvement year-over-year. So I'm just trying to figure out from a driver standpoint, if we believe this is a potentially a double-digit growth -- revenue growth business again, I don't know if there's another enterprise plus, so to speak, ahead or another kind of packaging price uplift. But it seems like we've monetized a lot of that already. And now really, that growth acceleration will be dependent upon seat growth. Is that a fair characterization?

I think what we've called out is as we think about the maturity of the enterprise plus kind of tailwind coming to a head and we're still seeing healthy growth year-on-year as we've called out on customers, matriculating to that plan. But as we kind of see that stabilize at a certain kind of rate and our product portfolio expands. We have called out that I would anticipate additional higher-tier plans in the future. So we haven't exactly talked about timing because some of that relates to our product road map of unannounced products and whatnot. But we're very thoughtful about making sure that we time that with a point where we have a strong new or multiple new offerings that we can bundle for customers. And again, that will, I think, be another driver of price per seat growth. when that happens. And then obviously, seat count growth becomes an additional lever. And then our platform kind of API consumption is another growth driver. So we're extremely confident and feel very, very -- just overall bullish on the portfolio of growth drivers we have between seats, platform consumption, price per seat, kind of the vertical expansion efforts and various kind of go to market engine optimization. So multiple levels of levers of growth going forward.

Appreciate the color. Thank you.

Yes. Thanks.

Your next question comes from the line of Jason Ader with William Blair. Your line is open.

Yes, thank you. Good afternoon, guys. Just wanted to try to make sense of some of your commentary on macro. And maybe what's -- can we look at it as historically just how it's changed from, let's say, end of last year until today, do you feel like it has improved over the last eight months from just the demand signals. You talked about pipeline, you talked about good traction with some of your large customers. You talked about interest in AI. But maybe just if you can kind of give us a punchline in terms of whether you feel the demand environment is actually improved at all? Or it sort of just continues to be muted.

Yes. I think at a more qualitative level, and this is backed up by our deal trends, when I look at our big customer wins, the verticals, expansion, et cetera, I think we saw sort of the added and increased pressure go from last year's Q3 and Q4 coming into the year, that was sort of the ramp-up as we headed into this year was sort of where the macro started to flow into the business that we saw. I think we're -- and I'll let Dylan build on this as he sees fit. But I think we're at the more stabilization period of that. We're now lapping that year of that initial impact. And so we see some positive signs of when you kind of look on the year-over-year basis, coming into the second-half of the year, multiple metrics start to improve as a result of that. Obviously, the nature of the SaaS model and just the fact that you -- both the SaaS dynamics, but also just the seat dynamic of the business, you sometimes have a macro trend that can be offset a little bit from where it shows up in the numbers. But I think we're at a point where when I look at the pipeline build the kind of color and the customer conversations that we're having, the industries across our 1000-plus wins, it's really every single industry is represented, financial services, health care, technology, kind of really across the board. So I think there's a bunch of positives in the data, but just at a more muted level because that seat count growth that is obviously core to our engine has been more muted as a result of the macro.

Yes. And just to build on that a bit, I would say to clarify that over the earlier part of the year, so if you're saying comparing when we enter the year versus what we've seen would certainly call out and have called out that there have been some incremental headwinds and impacts related to the macroeconomic environment, but again, optimistic that we're seeing that stabilization now and everything we are talking about, it's true around the AI excitement, the pipeline that we're starting to see build at healthier levels. But that's not going to show up in this year's top line outlook just because of the timing and with AI, for example, we're not monetizing that as of yet. So that's more of a next year type impact.

Okay. So fair to say that things kind of have dipped a little bit since the beginning of the year, but now instead of continuing to dip, they sort of seem to be stabilizing.

That's exactly right.

Okay. All right. And then on AI, Aaron, just from a monetization standpoint, is it right to think there's sort of two main methods for you to monetize. One is kind of a seed price uplift where you add this AI functionality where people can ask questions of their box content. And then secondly would be kind of API consumption where some external app wants to leverage the Box content cloud for some external app, and they use an API to kind of talk to you -- talk to the Box content. Is that correct?

Yes. That's the right way to think about it philosophically. On the former part of the pricing component, I'll just note that we haven't announced yet what that will look like and where that may or may not be included. But those dynamics of -- there's a per seat component of Box AI that will have some set of functionality. And then there's a platform component of Box AI that will be more consumption driven. Those are the right ways to think about how the product will manifest from a pricing packaging standpoint.

And have you given any specific timing or any kind of general timing around when any of these things will be material or start to contribute to revenue?

Yes. We haven't given that timing only because I think even as we look at the rest of the market and where other kind of enterprise software platforms are, I think, the dynamic is – generally, this is the year where a lot of the technology is getting built. I think customers are starting to think about how they're going to incorporate this into their workflows and organizations, as well as get expanded budget from an IT standpoint. So I think as Dylan just called out, probably this would be more of an element for next year's plan. But right now, it's certainly a driver of the vast majority of CIO conversations that we're having just because everybody is really figuring out where -- what is their AI strategy going to look like? And as a platform that houses a significant portion of their most important data, you can imagine the customers are coming to us quite excitedly trying to work out what are the different use cases that they can be solving with Box AI.

Thank you.

Yes, thanks.

Your next question comes from the line of Pinjalim Bora with JPMorgan. Your line is open.

Oh, great. Thanks for taking the question. Aaron, I wanted to ask on the macro headwind that you're seeing. In your conversations, do you feel like it is part of kind of a reassessment of budgets by companies to fund their own AI projects? Is that coming up in conversations at all?

We haven't seen that impact kind of any of the near medium-term deals that we look at in the pipeline only because we tend to have very direct use cases that a customer is expanding for and sort of the -- sort of maybe general AI budget would be maybe a bit orthogonal to that. I could see that showing up maybe against somebody's infrastructure budget or maybe some of their platform services they use. But for the content management collaboration workflow dollars that we tend to be getting, I haven't seen that happen. That's not to say it's impossible, but that has not shown up to me.

So you don't think there's a portion that's going to, I don't know, Microsoft CoPilot that is not going to Box at this point or something like that?

Oh, sorry, if it's more directly in that sense than I would say definitely not just because those products are simply too new and also still orthogonal in terms of the use cases that we're solving. So we just announced as an example of our integration with CoPilot. So I think you'll see a lot of strong interoperability there. Our customer conversations on this subject are very much focused on how can they be leveraging Box AI either through the end user interface or is the platform component to help customers with their business processes in a range of industries. So I don't think we're sort of competing for budget in those other domains right now.

Got it. And Dylan, one question on the reduction in the constant currency growth rate from, I think, 10% to 8%. How much of that 2 point delta do you say is driven by professional services?

It's a minority able to size it. It's kind of more than $1 million, but the bulk of it is on the recurring side.

Got it. Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Ittai Kidron with Oppenheimer. Your line is open.

Hi, it’s George Iwanyc. Maybe, Aaron, digging into the competitive environment, can you give us a sense of -- are you seeing some positive gains from a consolidation standpoint and then on a pricing standpoint for a like-for-like basis? Are you holding or seeing any increases?

Yes. So when I look at, again, kind of top deals, customers over $100,000, there's a lot in there that are consolidation of other vendors in the Box often legacy systems and technologies where Box is increasingly becoming the common standard of that organization. We're seeing a number of deals where Box Sign is a core component and customers are able to save money on maybe an e-signature vendor, we're seeing this with Canvas and kind of whiteboard technology. So that's folding more into Box. And so we're definitely very happy to see those trends. On the pricing side, we are -- we did see kind of pricing improvements in the quarter and have over the past year. And that's been helpful again sort offsetting some of that more -- some of the seat dynamic and we're going to just -- as we move more customers in Enterprise Plus, I think we'll continue to see that. And then future product plans would obviously have that same dynamic as well.

And Dylan, maybe one for you. Can you give us some sense of how you're looking at hiring? I know you're continuing to be very mindful with your OpEx. But are you looking at still adding to both the sales and the R&D headcount at this point?

We are. But certainly, more moderate growth and very much focused, especially on the R&D side in in scaling in Poland and being certainly hiring everywhere, but that is the emphasis in terms of number of people. And then on the AE front, we are on track and still expect to achieve that initial target of quota-carrying AE growth in the mid-single-digit percentage range.

Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Rishi Jaluria with RBC. Your line is open.

Thanks. This is Rich Poland on for Rishi. Thanks for taking my question. Aaron, you mentioned a little bit about doubling down on key verticals and geographies on the go-to-market side. If we were to just peel that back a little, are there any particular areas where you feel that you're currently underpenetrated and you see some low-hanging fruit to go after or anything around that?

Yes. I mean where we do, I would say, maybe disproportionately well are areas that actually have the greatest amount of security, compliance, data privacy concerns within the customer base. And so if you think about large global multinational corporations, manufacturers, financial services providers, life sciences. We did a major deal at a seven-figure deal at a major law firm. So anywhere where customers are -- have highly sensitive data where they have to collaborate on that data in and outside their enterprise, and they often have a layer of compliance requirements within their organization. Those are where we do really well. And I would say in every market, there's massive untapped upside. And so that leads you to, again, a lot of upside in public sector. We're seeing healthy traction in state and local. Obviously, a lot of upside on the federal side. We have quite a bit of upside in life sciences, health care, financial services and insurance. So those are a few of the verticals where I think you'd see disproportionate upside over time.

Got it. That's very helpful. And then just a follow-up, I know that the seats aspect seems to be seeing a little bit more pressure. But if we just look at the suites contribution to total revenue and the $100,000 deals, obviously, it seems like there's a bit of broad-based pressure as well. So I'm just curious, are there any particular aspects of suites that are harder to sell in this environment or anything you'd call out there?

I think I wouldn't call it suites in that sense. I mean I think there's suites is maybe in the commerce, it's actually a major driver of our sales motion because customers get even more value when they purchase from Box. So I'd say, overall, it's actually one of our primary differentiators, if anything.

Yes. And maybe also just to clarify, can you talk about some of the other impacts, like on the large deal growth that is not separate from, but it's actually directly related to seat growth. when you have customers who are not expanding at their typical rates, especially existing customers, those two are actually pretty closely correlated. So that's not a separate dynamic but actually largely a function of the seat growth dynamics.

Got it. Very helpful. Thank you.

Yes, thank you.

Thanks.

Your next question comes from the line of Steve Enders with Citi. Your line is open.

Okay, great. Thanks for taking the question. I guess I want to ask a bit more on the AI angle as you're talking to customers a lot and have, you know, share some things. I guess how do you view the rate to win within some of those use cases you're going after? And I guess what are you kind of -- how are like customers thinking about their own AI investments at this point in utilizing Box versus other players out there that are talking about AI.

Yes. So I think this will be a surprise to anybody on this call, but we almost have to assume if you're an enterprise software, you're also in AI. So at this point, you kind of have to think about AI is almost -- it's mobile, it's cloud, in its pervasiveness. So it's a platform architecture that is going to exist in all technology. And then there's kind of almost like a heat map or sensitivity of what kind of data and workflows does that enterprise software company have and how much does AI relate to that set of data and workflow. And so we've talked about this in the past, but by definition, large language models do really, really powerful things to large amounts of text and you see large amounts of text and documents. And so that kind of right to win question, we house tens and tens of billions of files that are very ripe for AI helping customers understand within that content, helping automate workflows around it, helping extract metadata from those documents. And so I think our right to win is extremely strong in anything that is sort of content related from an AI use case standpoint. And so just to rattle off a few of the examples, just in the past maybe two weeks of customer conversations, you could have a large real estate organization or a private equity firm or an insurance company where they have invoices or contracts or leasing documents that come in those today have to be read by a human, processed by a human. Somebody has to extract all the data in a very manual way and large language models, either again through our interface or APIs can do a lot of that heavy lifting automatically using AI. And so just by the nature of our business model, because we already manage that content and in many cases, orchestrate the workflows around that content, we become the natural place for plugging in the AI models to that content as well as opposed to shipping around that data to other platforms. So I think in that sense, our right to win is sort of like right in the very center of the target zone. And now it's the journey of getting customers, educated on how to implement it, building out all of the platform components necessary and then ultimately having a business model where we can share some of that upside of the performance with customers from a pricing standpoint.

Helpful hopeful context there. I do want to ask also on some of the investments, it sounds like you're making in go-to-market with the expanded marketing initiatives, maybe some more vertical focus and the turning on the partner side. I guess is there some signal that you're seeing out there that is leading to those incremental investments? Or how are you viewing, I guess, the efficacy of those expanded initiatives at this time.

Yes. So I think the macro color now down on the -- into the daily conversations that we tend to have with customers, if you kind of look at six or nine months ago and customers planning their budgets and their cycle, maybe at the start of this year, that's where you saw that -- again, that initial ramp up of pressure of customers not having as much -- as many strategic initiatives because they didn't know where the macro is going to go and how it was going to affect their industry or business. I think you've had the past six months of starting to see some degree of stabilization from again, like capital and macro like we're talking inflation rates and interest rate dynamics of where that is going to trend and so now I think the customer conversations we're having have the ability to be more long-term oriented where customers are talking about, okay, what is their IT strategy going to look like next year? Not dollars necessarily, but what kinds of programs and initiatives are they going to do? That gives us the signal that, okay, we can now put more emphasis on really making sure we're in every major city with the right kind of field events, driving the right kind of digital marketing campaigns to drive more conversations. And it's been a steady ramp up throughout the year to be clear. But I was calling it out because this is going to be a continued focal point for us. I mean, we're planning on having the biggest digital Box works yet. We're bringing back Box's CIO conference. CIO works in person this October. And so I think we are seeing enough signal in the conversations that that warrant making sure we're driving the right level of demand and pipeline.

Okay, perfect. Thanks for taking the questions.

Yes, thanks.

This concludes today's Q&A session. I will now turn the call back to Cynthia for closing remarks.

Great. Thank you, everyone. As Aaron mentioned, we are holding BoxWorks on October 11, and we'll be hosting a virtual investor product briefing at 1:00 p.m. Pacific time. We'll be sending out more details shortly. Again, thank you, everyone, for joining us today.

This concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.