Good day, ladies and gentlemen and welcome to the Bank of Hawaii Corporation Second Quarter 2019 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I would now like to introduce your host for today’s conference, Cindy Wyrick, Director of Investor Relations. You may begin.

Thank you, GG. Good morning, everyone and good afternoon. Thank you for joining us today as we review the financial results for the second quarter of 2019. Joining me today is our Chairman, President and CEO, Peter Ho; our Chief Financial Officer, Dean Shigemura; and our Chief Risk Officer, Mary Sellers. Before we get started, let me remind you that today’s conference call will contain some forward-looking statements. And while we believe our assumptions are reasonable, there are a variety of reasons that the actual results may differ materially from those projected. And now, I would like to turn the call over to Peter Ho.

Thanks, Cindy. Hello and good morning, everyone. Thanks for joining us today. We were very pleased with our overall financial results for the second quarter of 2019. We had good financial performance. Our asset quality remains solid. Expenses were well controlled. And our liquidity and capital levels remained strong. Our loans grew to $10.8 billion at the end of the quarter, up 2% from the previous quarter with good growth in both commercial and consumer loans. Compared with the second quarter last year, total loans increased 7%. Deposits increased to $15.5 billion, up 1.5% from the previous quarter and compared with the end of the second quarter last year, total deposits were up 3.7%. Now, let me ask Dean to provide you with some additional details on our financial performance this quarter and then Mary will comment on our asset quality. Dean?

Thank you, Peter. Net income for the second quarter was $56.9 million or $1.40 per share compared to $58.8 million or $1.43 per share in the previous quarter, and $54.7 million or $1.30 per share in the second quarter of 2018. Our return on assets during the second quarter was 1.31%, the return on equity was 17.97%, and our efficiency ratio improved to 54.69%. Our net interest margin in the second quarter was 3.04%, down 8 basis points from the first quarter of 2019 and equal to the net interest margin in the second quarter of 2018. Net interest income on a reported basis in the second quarter was $124.1 million, compared with $124.8 million in the previous quarter and $120.5 million in the same quarter last year. The decline in the margin for the second quarter of 2019 reflects the impact of the lower interest rate environment. Given the current challenging rate environment, we anticipate that the net interest margin in the second half of the year will be approximately the same as the second quarter. As Mary will discuss later, we recorded a credit provision of $4 million this quarter. Non-interest income increased to $45.5 million in the second quarter of 2019, compared with $43.7 million in the previous quarter and $41.3 million in the same quarter last year. There were no significant items during the second quarter of 2019. Non-interest income in the first quarter of 2019 included a one-time $1.4 million insurance commission related to products we offered through a third party administrator. Non-interest income during the second quarter of 2018 included a negative adjustment of $1 million related to a change in the Visa Class B conversion ratio. The increase in non-interest income during the second quarter of 2019 reflects growth in mortgage banking revenue,…

Thank you, Dean. Net charge-offs for the second quarter totaled $2.4 million or 0.09% annualized of total average loans and leases outstanding as compared with net charge-offs of $3.7 million or 0.14% annualized in the first quarter of 2019, and $3.3 million or 0.13% annualized in the second quarter of 2018. Non-performing assets were $21.8 million or 20 basis points at the end of the second quarter, up from $17.9 million or 17 basis points at the end of the first quarter of 2019, and up from $15.2 million or 15 basis points at the end of the second quarter of last year. The increase for the quarter was primarily driven off $5.5 million in commercial mortgage exposure to one customer in Guam that was placed on non-accrual this quarter. Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interests totaled $6.4 million compared to $6.1 million at the end of the first quarter of 2019, and $13.3 million at the end of the second quarter of 2018. Restructured loans not included in non-accrual loans or loans past due 90 days or more totaled $48.6 million, flat with the prior quarter and down $1.6 million year-over-year. Residential mortgage loans modified to assist our customers accounted for $20.4 million of the total. At the end of the second quarter, the allowance for loan and lease losses totaled $107.7 million, up $1.7 million for the first quarter – from the first quarter. Given net charge-offs of $2.4 million, a credit provision of $4 million was recorded. The ratio of the allowance to total loans and leases was 1% at the end of the quarter, down 1 basis point for the linked period and down 8 basis points year-over-year. The allowance reflects the continued strength in the company’s asset quality and the Hawaii economy over this period as well as the mix in loan growth. The total reserve for unfunded commitments was $6.8 million at the end of the quarter, unchanged from the first quarter of 2019 and second quarter of 2018. I’ll now turn the call back to Peter.

Great. Thanks, Mary. The Hawaii economy continues to perform reasonably. Our statewide unemployment rate in June was 2.8% and remains very low compared to the unemployment rate of the 3.7% nationally. Visitor arrivals continue to increase and for the first five months of 2019 were up 3.8% compared to the same period in 2018. Even with the growth in arrivals, we’re seeing a decline in daily spend, the total visitor spending down 3.1% compared with the same period in 2018. Oahu residential real estate was a bit of a mixed bag, with sales-off a bit, pricing relatively flat, but inventory level still remaining tight. For the first six months of 2019, the volume of single-family home sales on Oahu decreased 3.7% and median sales prices were down 0.5% compared with the same period in 2018. The volume of condominium sales during the first half of 2019 on Oahu declined 8.8% with median sales prices, down 1.4%. Once of inventory at the end of the quarter were 3.6 months for a single-family home and 3.9 months for condominiums. The median days on market for the first half of 2019 was 23 days for a single-family home and 27 days for a condominium. Thanks again for joining us today, and now we’d be happy to respond to your questions.

[Operator Instructions] And our first question is from Ebrahim Poonawala from Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Your line is now open.

Good morning, guys.

Good morning.

So just first question around the margin outlook, you mentioned you expect the margin in the back half to stay stable relative to 2Q. If – I was wondering if you could tell us what assumptions you’re making around the Fed cutting interest rates in the back half in that guidance? And as well as what you expect in terms of the pace of change in the cost of interest bearing deposits relative to the 9 basis points that we saw in the second quarter?

Yes, right now, we have two rate cuts built in 25 each at the end of this month being the first and perhaps around September or the November meeting with the second. So that’s included in the guidance on the margin. In terms of the deposit pricing, what we did see on a monthly basis, if you look at our – when we looked at our monthly data that June was the kind of decelerated in terms of the increases. So that kind of gives us a little bit of confidence that some of the actions we’ve been currently taking which is to – we do some of the higher, more expensive deposits is having an effect and we’re going to continue that. And we expect that the deposit rates were start to flatten out and start turning down later in the year.

In this guide – yes, that’s helpful. I was just wondering if you take that a step forward, do you think the margin just give or take, around this where it was in the second quarter is fairly defendable if we get more than just two rate cuts over the next year? Like if you can just talk to like the pressure points around the yield curve that could actually lead to more meaningful margin compression over the next year?

If the Fed does cut rates further, that would have a probably affect our margin guidance. It would probably be lower. In addition to just general deposit competition in the local market could also affect the margin somewhat.

Got it. And I guess just moving to just growth outlook and just credit quality, I means obviously, just to one credit. But Peter would appreciate just your thoughts around how you’re looking at the market in terms of both approach of loan growth expectations around that and if you’re seeing anything troubling on the credit front?

Well, I think that the forward look from a growth perspective is beginning the verge ever so slightly Ebrahim. I would say that environmentally clearly, we’re beginning to see signs I think, not different from what a lot of people reporting on a national basis of growth flattening out and really somewhat reflective of a 10-year expansion. So I don’t think that there is cause for alarm there. But when you look at housing price point performance, what’s happening in our visitor industry, what’s happening in the broader market is pretty clear that we are flattening out a bit. And frankly, that’s what we would anticipate at this point in the cycle. How that’s translating into our forward view on growth performance. However, I think we still feel very comfortable with the idea of loan growth in the mid to upper single-digit range and deposit growth, call it in the mid-single-digit range. Our pipelines and forecasts and just discussions with our front-line people, I think have us pretty confident in that view at this point. In terms of credit quality, I would say that it’s still pretty pristine, but not completely spotless is the way that I would describe the credit environment right now. The consumer side is still trending very nicely. The commercial side, still looks good and very good by historical standards. But as Mary mentioned, we are beginning to see that one off credit situation with some of our smaller commercial clients.

Got it. Thanks for taking my questions.

Yes.

Thank you. Our next question is from Jeff Rulis from D.A. Davidson. Your line is now open.

Thanks. Good morning.

Good morning, Jeff.

Just a question on the, on the fee income line. I believe you had guided last quarter to the $42 million a quarter, you put up $45 million plus this quarter, then back down to $43 million. Maybe just talk about the pieces that are kind of guiding. Obviously, maybe mortgage and the trust side were heavier contributors. What within that back down to $43 million maybe lightens up over the balance of the year?

Yes, Jeff, and thanks for asking the question. The number has been moving around a bit. I think probably the best place to – the way to look at it is obviously, we’re very pleased with Q2, non-interest income levels. Q1 non-interest income levels were buoyed up a bit by $1.4 million in kind of one-time fee income that we generated off our insurance business. So if you were to back that out, kind of, I think where Dean is going with kind of the $43 million plus level is we think that we’re probably going to nestle moving forward in between Q1 and Q2 from a dollar level standpoint. The refi bloom that I’ll call it that we’ve experienced of late has been positive. We still have great volumes on the mortgage side, but maybe not as strong as what we experienced early in the second quarter with when rates really fell pretty dramatically. Q3 and Q4, we’re not going to get the seasonal benefits of our seasonal tax business that we’ve got in the second quarter. And finally, I’d say that the, the swap income, which has been a great story for us from a commercial standpoint, but was probably really at the very upper realms in Q2 and we would anticipate continued opportunity with that product category, but maybe not at the same levels of Q2.

Okay, that’s great. Thank you. And then Peter, just I guess on the broad kind of visitor spending numbers. I don’t know if you’ve kind of alluded to it. I don’t know if this is a product of again a macro trend of long in the tooth on a recovery that spending being down is that also a factor of kind of visitor mix or kind of what would you if you could wrap words around, what do you think is happening on the spending side? That would be helpful.

Yes, sure. So, Jeff, I think you touched on a lot of the items that we’re thinking about. I think it’s to understand the year-to-date performance on expenditures of down 3% on the face of it doesn’t look great, but I think we also have to recognize that, that 3% negative comp is coming on the heels of a 2018 May year-to-date comp that was plus 11% and a May year-to-date 2017 comp that was plus 10%. So yes, we’re flattening up, we’re flattening out from a pretty I think what everyone would agree as a pretty high level. We’ve been doing a lot of asking and research and just talking to our friends here within the industry recently and they see some things occurring. A lot of the lift that we’re getting into the market of recent is does skew more to the budget side, which I think helps to explain what’s happening on the arrival numbers versus the visitor spending numbers. If you look at the U.S. dollar relative to the euro, of late, and if you look at the Japanese yen relative to the euro, there is a little bit of a pricing bias against us for both Japanese visitors and American visitors, choosing between Europe or Hawaii. Europe is just trending to a better price point right now. And then finally, and kind of again in the category of kind of a fortunate individuals’ problem, our ADRs have been expanding and that’s been a wonderful thing for the visitor industry and tangentially down to our own economy. But that upward pressure on price points, you know at some point begins to meet pricing resistance and there is some sentiment of that might be occurring here in the marketplace. So, putting all that together, we’re seeing a flattening on the expenditure side, but I don’t think anyone’s terribly concerned at this point. I think we understand kind of the hows and whys of those inputs.

Got it, Peter. Appreciate your thoughts.

Yeah.

Thank you. Our next question is from Aaron Deer from Sandler O’Neill. Your line is now open.

Good morning, everyone.

Aaron.

Just quick question, going back to the CRE loan in Guam, Mary, just curious, it sounds like that’s just a one-off issue, but any color you can give in terms of what the situation was there potential loss content?

Well, I don’t see any potential loss content, our LTV on the transaction is 60%. It was a long tenured customer, has a portfolio of assets. He over invested in a couple and tried to get above market rents. I think he is beginning to deal with that now and starting to see some lease-up and he sold some additional assets to create some liquidity. So, I think we’re in a good spot.

Okay, that’s great. And then, Dean, I heard that your commentary around the reposition in the portfolio, but didn’t catch all those details. Can you maybe walk through again, just what the size of the repositioning was and what was accomplished as a result, in terms of what you’re hoping for in terms of the convexity or other natures of the portfolio that was changed as a result?

Yeah. So, we did, and just to give you some color on the timing was around mid-June. But we did move $1 billion worth of securities from held to maturity to the available for sale portfolio, and after that we sold about $580 million worth of securities and reinvested the proceeds. That’s probably going to that did net us a small gain and should help us on the net interest income side going forward.

Okay. So, I guess, maybe I can find this in the release, I missed it, but sort of the modest negative that you guys had on the modest loss on investment securities spend. Was that related to some of the legacy Class B stuff?

Yeah. So, that continues. So, I would say about roughly $900,000 was due to the Visa fees that we pay on the shares that we sold.

Okay. Okay, that’s great. Thanks for taking my questions.

Yes.

Thank you. Our next question is from Luke Wooten from KBW. Your line is now open.

Hi. Good morning, guys. Just want to kind of dig into the margin. Just a little bit more just kind of wanted to see, I know you guys talked about what you guys had for the assumptions of the rate cuts. I’m just kind of wanted to hear, how that impacts the loan portfolio and how you see that coming in toward the back half of the year?

Yes. So, we do have about 20% call it 25% of our loan book on what I would call a floating rate basis and some of that has already been coming down and LIBOR rates have been reduced. So, our prime and base rate loans would be readjusted lower, but that’s all factored into the guidance that I provided. And then kind of offsetting that is whatever we can do on the deposit side in terms of lower rates.

Okay, that’s helpful. Thank you. And then just on I thought the public and other balances, it said that there was a seasonally stronger demand for the public demand deposits. Just kind of wanted to hear what the how much is in that is public time deposits, right now?

It’s about little over $700 million is public time.

Okay.

Yes, $732 million. It increased by about $100 million quarter-over-quarter.

Got it. And that’s all my questions, I’ll step back. Thank you.

Thank you, Luke.

Thank you. Our next question is from Laurie Hunsicker from Compass Point. Your line is now open.

Yes, hi. Thanks. Good morning. I just wondered in the net interest income. Can you tell us how much was premium amortization this quarter?

Yes, so the premium amortization was $5.8 million. However, just need to also clarify that a lot of the change in the amount of the amortization was due to sale of some of our municipal securities.

Got it, okay.

The decrease was caused by that.

Okay. So I mean if I strip that out, then your core margin looks like was down 10 basis points versus you reported was down 8. How should we be thinking about premium then in the back half of the year?

Well, it will be rate dependent, but in terms of kind of the sensitivity to interest rates of the mortgage-backed securities and some SBA’s would be impacted by that. But we did do some of the sales toward the tail end of the quarter. So you may see still some decrease in the amortization just due to the sale of the municipal securities.

Okay, great. That’s helpful. Okay. And then, Mary, can you just comment on loan loss provision, and I might have missed this. Was there a specific reserve for the Guam CRE in the $4 million?

No, there wasn’t. We have a 60% loan to value and that’s based on updated appraisals. So we see no loss there, really driving the increase in the reserve was increase in growth in our portfolio for the quarter.

Got it, okay. And then certainly when I look at your loan growth this quarter, super strong 8% annualized. And I think you had said mid-single-digit. So how should we be thinking about loan loss provision in the back half of the year if we kind of marry that with your comments about credit as pristine, but not completely spotless. How should we be thinking about that?

Well, I think you’re right on point, Laurie. Really to be a factor of what our loan growth is the portfolios that growth comes in coupled with what we see within credit performance, which has been fairly consistently benign till this point.

Okay. But if that’s tracking maybe still in the low $4 million range or so per quarter that’s probably outside of a credit event that’s probably a good level. Am I thinking about that the right way?

Yes. Well, Laurie, it’s Peter, it’s – yes, so your comments are kind of backward, look back oriented and the provisions by definition has got to be forward-looking. So based on our historic trend, I think you have got a pretty good sense for directionally where this provision would end up, but the ultimate decision is going to be based on what we see at the end of next quarter as well.

Okay. On to non-interest income and I know that you had mentioned there was no significant items obviously, but the other seemed a little bit elevated, can you just talk about if there was anything not offering in that $6.385 million?

In other, other is the swap revenue that’s where it comes in.

Got it. And what was the swap revenue this quarter?

It’s about $2 million.

Okay. And then I guess on to your comments on NIM, non-interest expense, Dean, maybe you can just help me a little bit just sort of extrapolating off your forward guide. It’s looking like that number would be then running in the $94 plus million range per quarter, which is obviously up from where we were. Is there a directional spend that you are doing or did I mishear that, how should I be thinking about that number?

Well, the $94 million would be at the higher end. So if you took I guess a 3% there – in the second half, we do continue to have investments like I mentioned in lot of projects, technology and the facilities. We do have a number of executives that are coming on board that have joined us in addition to in the fourth quarter just being for us a noisy quarter when we do our year-end true-ups.

Okay, that’s helpful. I will leave it there. Thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] At this time, I am showing no further questions. I would like to turn the call back over to Cindy Wyrick for closing remarks.

I would like to thank all of you for joining us again today and for your continued interest in Bank of Hawaii. As always, please feel free to contact me if you have additional questions or need further clarification on any of the topics discussed today. Thanks again, everyone and have a great day.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your participation in today’s conference. This concludes the program. You may now disconnect.