Good afternoon, and welcome to the BMO Financial Group’s fourth quarter 2010 conference call for December 7th, 2010. Your host for today is Viki Lazaris, Senior Vice President of Investor Relations. Ms. Lazaris, please go ahead.

Thank you, and good afternoon, everyone, and thanks for joining us today. Our agenda for today’s investor presentation is as follows. We will begin the call with remarks from Bill Downe, BMO’s CEO; followed by presentations from Russ Robertson, the Bank’s Chief Financial Officer; and Tom Flynn, our Chief Risk Officer. After their presentations, we will have a short question-and-answer period where we will take questions from pre-qualified analysts. To give everyone an opportunity to participate, please keep it to one or two questions and then re-queue. We will wrap up the call at 3 PM. Also with us this afternoon are BMO’s business unit heads; Tom Milroy from BMO Capital Markets; Gilles Ouellette from the Private Client Group; Frank Techar, Head of P&C Canada; and Ellen Costello from P&C U.S. At this time, I would like to caution our listeners by stating the following on behalf of those speaking today. Forward-looking statements may be made during this call, and they are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from forecasts, projections, or conclusions in the forward-looking statements. You can find information about the material factors that could cause our actual results to so differ, and information about the material factors and assumptions that were applied in drawing conclusions or making the forecasts or projections in these forward-looking statements on Page 29 and Page 30 of our 2010 Annual MD&A. With that said, I’ll hand things over to Bill.

Thank you, Viki, and good afternoon everyone. As noted, my comments may include forward-looking statements. BMO’s fourth quarter financial results reinforced the trends that have been evident throughout the year. We are generating good revenue growth, momentum is visible across all our business groups, loan loss trends are generally positive, return on equity continues to increase, and our capital position remains strong. We are achieving the success, we are also investing in future growth, specifically the fourth quarter saw increased investment spend in our retail businesses and in technology and operations resulting in higher expense. This reflects rather our commitment to invest in frontline staff and to expand our branch network and online customer experience. Revenue in the fourth quarter was $3.2 billion, up 8% and net income was 739 million, 14% above last year. Cash EPS came in at $1.26 per share and our ROE was 15.1%. The 253 million fourth quarter provisions for credit losses were significantly improved from last year and was slightly elevated from the previous quarter, we believe that there was a credit recovery underway and have confidence in an overall continued positive trend, and Tom Flynn will provide more color later in the call. For the full year, revenue increased 10.4% to $12.2 billion, and net income increased to 2.8 billion. Provisions for credit losses were reduced substantially and cash productivity improved 440 basis points to 61.9%. Return on equity increased to 14.9% from 9.9% a year ago, and BMO’s U.S. operations returned to profitability in 2010 as reported with actual credit losses. Pretax pre-provision earnings were 4.6 billion, up 937 million from the previous year, reaching the highest level in the history of the Bank, and BMO finished the year with a strong capital position. Russ will take you through our Group results…

Thanks, Bill, and good afternoon. Some of my comments may be forward-looking. Please note the caution regarding forward-looking statements at the beginning of the presentation. On Slide 9, you can see that fourth quarter earnings were 739 million or $1.24 per share compared to $1.11 last year. On a cash basis, current quarter earnings were $1.26 per share. BMO’s capital position remained strong. The fourth quarter results closed on a good year where we delivered net income of 2.8 billion with revenues of 12.2 billion, with significant momentum across our businesses. Turning to Slide 10, revenues were up year-over-year and quarter-over-quarter, driven by solid increases in all operating groups. Net interest income was 1.6 billion in the quarter, up 168 million or 11.6% from a year ago. Quarter-over-quarter, net interest income increased 39 million or 2.4%, mainly due to good growth from our P&C businesses. The total Bank net interest margin was up 16 basis points year-over-year. P&C Canada benefited from higher spreads in personal loans and deposits as well as additional personal lending interest revenue in the quarter. In P&C U.S., improved loan spreads and deposit balance growth were partially offset by deposit spread compression. BMO Capital Markets benefited from lower funding costs. Quarter-over-quarter, margins were essentially flat as increase in our retail businesses and corporate services were largely offset by lower trading net interest income in capital markets. Turning to Slide 11, year-over-year expenses increased 244 million or 14%. The Diners Club and Rockford acquisitions accounted for approximately 25% of the increase, including integration costs. Employee compensation was higher due to increased staffing levels in each of our groups and higher performance-based compensation, in line with improved performance. There were also higher costs related to business initiatives, as we continue to increase our sales force and build infrastructure…

Thanks, Russ, and good afternoon. Before I begin, I draw your attention to the caution regarding forward-looking statements. I will start with Slide 26 where we provide a breakdown of our loan portfolio. The portfolio continues to be well-diversified both geographically and by portfolio segment. 76% of loans are in Canada and 19% in the U.S. Consumer portfolios represent 64% of the Canadian portfolio and 86% of these are secured. Our U.S. portfolio mix is 44% consumer and 56% commercial and corporate. Slide 27 provides details on our U.S. loan portfolio, which represents 19% of total loans. The total portfolio is well-diversified, and we believe that our underwriting practices have been more conservative than the industry overall. The U.S. consumer portfolios are relatively evenly spread across first mortgage home equity and auto loans. Weak U.S. labor and real estate markets continue to impact these portfolios; however all three segments are performing better than peers. The C&I portfolio is performing reasonably considering the environment and is well-diversified. As we have discussed in previous quarters, U.S. commercial real estate sector remains under pressure. With the slow pace of the recovery, we expect improvement in this sector to take time. This portfolio is approximately 3.3 billion or 2% of total loans and 10% of U.S. loans. Investor-owned mortgages represent approximately 5% of U.S. portfolio. While impacted by the environment, the investor-owned mortgages are well-diversified across our footprint and by property type and were underwritten prudently. The developer portfolio has continued to reduce as well under 1 billion in size and represents less than 2% of total U.S. loans. This portfolio was impacted early in the downturn and we believe that formations here have peaked. Turning now to Slide 28, the chart shows information on impaired loans and formations for the quarter. Impaired formations…

(Operator instructions) The first question is from Andre Hardy of RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Yes, I have two questions. The first for Bill please. You raised your EPS growth objective from 10% to 12%. I'm a little surprised you didn't address that in your opening remarks, but perhaps you can tell us now what has given you the confidence to increase your EPS growth objectives now.

Okay. Thanks for the question, Andre. If you reflect on the last three years or so, I think there has been headwinds in markets, there has been a slow economy and obviously there has been provisions for credit losses at elevated level. As we look forward or maybe the same period three years or so, what I think we are going to see is, is a gradual pickup in economic growth. We have said before that a bank with a very clear expression of its brand and its position in the marketplace is going to have the opportunity to grow share across its business. We do expect that we are going to see a moderation in credit provisions over this period, and we think realistically in this timeframe, a slightly higher EPS growth rate is achievable. We also take confidence from the fact that over the last eight quarters, we have seen good fundamental growth in all four of our major business groups and I qualify the good part of it, because we are growing revenue, and we are reinvesting in the businesses at the same time. So, I think it’s an expression of confidence in the positioning of the bank, the markets that – and the confidence in the markets where we are competing.

And just to be clear, that's an organic growth target – there are no acquisition assumptions?

You know, what I would include in that is, is the kinds of small acquisitions that we have been making as we have gone along. Over the last two or three years, we have made some very nice tuck-in acquisitions that have been complementary to the businesses and I would foresee them continuing.

Okay. Thank you. And the second question refers to the disclosure on counterparty credit risk, and the estimate of a $23 billion increase in risk-weighted assets. Do you assume that you will be able to use advanced models for counterparty credit risk, which would be positive for the Bank?

In calculating that number, Andre, we haven’t – we have used an exposure at default method based on the current exposure methodology, and so we have gone with what we think is a conservative number here, both in terms of how we have calculated it and given that we haven’t considered steps that we could take to mitigate it, which would include moving parts of the business to clearing organizations.

Do you know if you use an advanced model the kind of break you would get?

Not with any precision. So, we think there would be a meaningful impact, but I really can’t quantify it for you.

Okay, thank you.

Thank you. The next question is from John Reucassel of BMO Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Thank you. And just – I want to thank you for your disclosure on that capital. That is very helpful, and too bad your peers out there didn't do that. I just want to get back to the earnings growth, Bill. You also took down your operating leverage target. So, I guess you are relying more and more on revenue growth. And is this really a story of getting the U.S. business growing more, or is Frank expected to deliver what seems to be pretty good growth even in a slowing environment?

Thanks for the question, John, and thanks for the observation on the capital. I think the process of going through the analysis in developing a pro forma was helpful for us as we started to think about the outlook for the future as well. The operating leverage reduction I think reflects the rate of investment that we have been running recently and that’s been across all of the businesses. I think there is a couple of ways that it’s playing out. One is a real focus on the front line and we have been building expenses in the frontline, but the other element of it is the integration across the product lines and the major lines of business as we have really pulled the brand together, both in Canada and the United States and the consistency on both sides of the border that’s showing up in product offering in a way that we advertise and promote and the type of new product introductions that we are doing. So, the benefit we have seen from the dollars invested has given us some confirmation that consistent investment focused in this way will show up in the topline, and I would look to all of the businesses to benefit from it in the same way in the sense that P&C Canada is in excess of half of the earnings in the most recent year, you can expect that we would be looking to Frank and his team to contribute a big portion of this, but it applies to all the businesses.

Okay. And then, just the – on the NCIB, the high dividend payout ratio, relatively high, still outside the target range. But you have lots of excess capital and you even pro forma Basel III, you meet it today. So, should we expect it to be active in the NCIB this year, or are there still issues that is holding BMO back?

There is no, I mean, there is no specific signal we renewed it. In the ordinary course, I would expect that we would use it in the future. And I would differentiate it from any of the discussion about the use of surplus capital. I think it’s a tour around managing dilution from existing programs and we renewed it in the expectation at some point we would simply start using it.

Okay. Thank you.

Thank you. The next question is from Darko Mihelic of Cormark Securities. Please go ahead.

Hi there. Some questions here for – can you hear me?

We can.

Okay, sorry. I switched headsets there. A question for Tom Flynn. And Tom, I apologize if this gets a little technical, but I wanted to just circle back and make sure I've got a good understanding here of Apex and Links. I'm looking at page 2 of the extra information that you've given us, as well as the annual statements, and a couple things pop out at me. The first question with respect to Apex is the notional maturities. You've got 26% maturing in 2012, 44% in 2013 and the rest in 2016 or thereabouts anyway. The question is should we care about refi risk on any of those maturities? And secondly, also in respect to the Links and Parkland, you mentioned some of the maturities that are happening there. When I total it all up, is there going to be a significant risk-weighted asset sort of relief that is coming from these maturities?

Okay. I will start with Apex, and on that slide that you are looking at, we give the maturity dates for the notional amounts that we have outstanding. There is refinancing risk associated with this structure. The underlying credit is in the form of CDS, and they simply expire half the dates that you see there on the page. So, that will happen as a matter of course without incident or risk on the dates. On the SIVs, we have got the disclosure with respect to the maturities. And there will be some RWA relief overtime as that vehicle reduces obviously assuming that the credit quality remains the same. So, there is some benefit overtime. I wouldn’t say that that’s going to be significant over the next year just given the amount of maturities that we have got coming up.

And one last question on the Links and Parkland. I am trying to triangulate this with your annual report, and I notice in the annual report that drawn facilities and the loans provided does not equal what you have here, and in fact, it is about $2 billion higher. What other vehicle are you out there funding that would have about – or close to $2 billion of extra funding?

Where are you looking, in the Annual Report?

I'm looking in the notes, page 128. I see $6.9 billion of drawn facilities, and it doesn't quite add up to what you've got here on this page.

Just give us a second, Darko. We are all looking at the page to make sure we catch up with you. The correct amount for the Links and Parkland exposures you see on that page in the top half of the table, so there is about 5 billion. And I believe, we will come back and confirm this with you, but I think the rest of it relates to capital securities. The things like the boat [ph], innovative Tier 1 securities, but we will confirm that.

Okay. That’s very helpful. Thanks for the disclosure.

Thanks.

Thank you. The next question is from Sumit Malhotra of Macquarie Capital Management. Please go ahead.

Good afternoon. My first question is for Frank Techar. Frank, if I look at the level of non-interest expenses in the Canadian Banking segment, clearly, you had a step-up in Q3 and you followed up with that in Q4. We heard the conversation and the commentary around the HST. When you talk about the investment spending that is still required for BMO in Canadian banking and measure that against the levels we've seen in the second half of the year, what kind of expense growth do you think we're going to see the segment put forth in 2011?

Yes, thanks, Sumit. Well, you can expect that the expense growth next year is going to be higher than it was in 2010. Just for starters, 2010, we were at for the full year 4.9%, which was about a percent higher than 2009. And going back to Bill’s earlier comments about the business and the overall performance of the business, we are really confident in our ability to grow our topline, and if you look at the last two full years in P&C Canada, we had revenue growth in excess of 10%. So, we are confident that our investments, whatever they will be, will pay off for us overtime as we have continued to change our model and our capabilities. So, the growth and expenses will be higher than last year. What I can also say is, I would expect that our cash productivity ratio is going to remain at or near the level that you have seen over the last couple of quarters in the low-50s. So, we are not going to undermine our cash productivity position at this point in time. And the level of expenses, the absolute level of expenses that you have seen in the last couple of quarters are probably what you can expect for the next couple of quarters as we go into 2011. So, we are going to be operating at an elevated level. If you look at the full year, more in line with the latter half of this year as we go into next year.

I am glad you set it up that way, Frank, because the next part of my question is – and I may be guilty of short-termism here – there has obviously been a lot of hand-wringing about the state of the Canadian housing market and what that will mean for loan growth for the banks in Canada. And also, if competition heats up in a slowing growth environment, what that will do to net interest margin. And that short-term comment comes from the fact that at least for Q4, loan growth seemed to be fine and net interest margin for most banks and their Canadian banking segment, including yours, actually expanded. So, is the Bank's view or is your view about real-estate-related lending in Canada and the margin environment in this flagship business not nearly as dire as we may be thinking on our side?

I don’t think that changed my opinion from previous quarters. I think what we have said in previous quarters is we would expect to see on the consumer side some slowing in the growth as we go into 2011. What I have said about margins is we will see some variability around an average that we have seen over the last year or so. We had a little bit of an improvement this quarter, but we know there are competitive pressures that will continue to be apparent. So, I am not expecting any huge margin expansion, I am expecting the consumer growth to moderate, but we are also in a position on the commercial side of our business to take advantage of the momentum that we have seen over the last couple of quarters. We are well positioned as the second biggest player in the marketplace. We have seen both loans and deposits grow very nicely and accelerate over the course of 2010, and my expectation is this business-led recovery that we are sort of in is going to continue and it bodes well for BMO as we look into the future.

Lastly for Bill or Ellen. I think most of us on the line today got the invitation a couple weeks ago to attend the Bank's investor day in Chicago in a few months' time. And now that we've got a pretty good idea what the Basel rules are going to look like and how well you score, my mind started thinking about whether you would have something new and larger to show us when we are down there. I heard your comment to Andre about the tuck-in acquisitions you've done over the last few years, but with that capital clarity now there, Bill, do you feel that the Bank is in a position to do something more sizable on the acquisition side? And what is the – I don't know if you want to talk about it this way, but what constraints are there that would prevent you from looking at deals that are more sizable than the tuck-ins that you've done and FDIC-assisted deal that you did earlier this year?

I will take the question because I think it started out heading towards the investor day, but you lapped back around on to the acquisition topic, which I am happy to speak to. I think that what we have been looking for is a shift that I think is taking place a little gradually, but a shift in the attitude of potential sellers about their own ability to grow coming out of the recession, I think we are starting to get a lot of clarification in what the capital rules would be, I am assuming that there are corporate boards that are working their way through the implication. So, I don’t know whether it’s in the early part of 2011 or later in the year, but as we have always said, we do think that there will be consolidation in the regional banking market, and it will probably start at some point during the year. And I do think it takes some time for boards to digest and work into their longer-term strategies what the implications are. It looks to me as though that the capital situation for most banks now is reasonably clear and you really then have to put it through the mill and say what are the expectations for growth. What we are doing in the interim, which I think is important is looking at ways to take the personal and commercial operating platform in the U.S. and integrate it more completely with Canada with the objective of driving down the ultimate cost in both markets and the opportunity overtime to consolidate more branches in, and even though that we have characterized the acquisitions as tuck-ins, they can be quite incremental and AMCORE is an acquisition that we are very pleased with. Not only have we been able to add almost 10% increase in branch counts, I think it’s a little bit more than 10% increase in branch counts. We did that very quickly. We had almost no loss of customers whatsoever. The retention levels have been extremely high, and we are starting to grow from that business base, because we have opened up two new markets, specifically the cities of Rockford and Madison. And so, I think that that’s an example of the kind of organic growth that we can expect from those acquisitions. So, whether it would a series of those or one slightly larger, I think it really is dependent upon on seller recognition, that consolidation ultimately is going to happen.

Thanks for your time.

Yes.

Thank you. The next question is from Robert Sedran of CIBC. Please go ahead.

Good afternoon. Just a couple of quick follow-ups, actually. So, Bill, just following on that last answer, given the excess capital that is kicking around, just philosophically, should we assume that anything aside from a transformational deal is likely to be done with cash, and regardless of whether you might fall below the Basel III requirements in the interim?

I just turned my mike back on. So, we try not to get too philosophical. We've tried to provide you with pretty clear disclosure and I don’t want to ruminate on anything in that regard other than to say that we have stated we are committed to maintaining strong capital ratios and we have delivered against that.

Okay. And I apologize if I missed it, but is the payout ratio target still 45% to 55%?

We haven’t changed it.

Are you comfortable with that level, Bill, or is it just a question of you're above the range now, so you will revisit it when you get closer to the range?

I am not uncomfortable, but I think as the earnings continue to grow, we will come back within the range and obviously consider it. I think it’s premature right now.

Okay. Thank you.

Thank you. The next question is from Mario Mendonca of Canaccord Genuity. Please go ahead.

Good afternoon. Two quick questions. Bill, on several of these calls in the past, you've talked about what it might take to get corporate lending growing again, or business loans. This is the first quarter since Q1 2009 that we actually saw a sequential increase. Is there anything we can read into that?

I think it’s going to pick up. It’s not showing up clearly in the economic numbers, but if you are out talking to mid-market companies, what I am detecting is a little bit of strain that’s start to set in from too many hours of overtime, trying to operate with too little inventory and some confirmation that they are seeing growth and that I would speak specifically to the U.S. market where I think we are going to see a pickup in exports and export demand is going to provide some confidence to the market, and I think that will be beneficial to both Canada and the United States.

Where was the growth in business loans this quarter? Was it in the U.S., where do we see it? Because it is hard to tell from the supplemental disclosure.

Yes, I will let Frank speak to it, because what we saw mostly in the quarter, I think relates to P&C Canada.

And Mario, our total commercial loans and acceptances in the P&C business, in Q4, our growth was 6.9% which was the highest in practically two years.

So, that’s quarter-over-quarter, Frank?

No, that’s year-over-year. Quarter-over-quarter, we went from – this is what you are looking for – but we went from a 4.4% growth in Q3 to 6.9% growth in Q4. So, our growth actually went up two-and-a-half points sequentially.

Got it. And Bill, nothing in the U.S. you would point me to in terms of business loan growth this quarter?

I will let Ellen speak to actual loan growth in the U.S.

Mario, just to complement what Frank said and what Bill said, I would say at this point we are not seeing specific loan growth, still a lot of cash in the balance sheet. The strain Bill mentioned is definitely there. People are feeling more secure. A lot of the new business we are bringing in are customers that want to be ready to drive down and do things but haven’t yet made their call. So, we think we will start to see more demand as you head towards the latter half of the year as some of the cash gets spent on this new investment and there is more confidence building.

Thanks. One final thing. Bill, the ROE, 17% to 20%, the top end, comparing that to what you put up this quarter, 15.3%, that is a long way to go. And even if you look, frankly, at the bottom end, until you go through the IFRS adjustment, the $1.3 billion hit to capital adjustment to open and retained earnings; I can see how that would help the ROE somewhat. But why have such a lofty ROE target out there, particularly if you are not talking about being a little more aggressive on capital management, like buybacks?

I think the calculation that we have made around capital, as Tom Flynn said, I think has been conservative with respect to steps that we might be able to take to reduce the impact going through. I continue to believe that margins are going to hold up. I think that alternatives to bank financing, when you have an economic growth are going to be the missing element in capital formation in North America. And so, I think a pickup of bank lending in the commercial sector without an erosion of margin is quite possible. So, I think the combination of those two factors means to me that, that I think the market is a little bit pessimistic about what kind of returns can be achieved over the next couple of years. And I also think that the strength that we are seeing in the wealth management area, the integration of wealth management products is more and more into our retail offering, both in Canada and United States means that we are going to be able to start to earn a higher proportion of our earnings from those higher ROE businesses. So, I think there is some complementary mix. As I said, I am a little bit more optimistic about spreads and growth in the commercial business and I think if you recall that we put a stepped up emphasis on commercial banking in the Mid-West where we haven’t seen very much growth for the last number of years. We are putting resources in there and the ROE of those businesses I think will be quite good. And then as I said in my opening comments, the last two or three years, we have had headwinds from provisions and impaired loans, and I think they are going to start to, I think they are going to start to abate. I think they are abating and you will see them come down over the course of the three years, and I would work that into my expectation of returns as well.

If I could just follow up for one second. You referred to Tom Flynn's calculations and how they are fairly conservative. The only way those conservative calculations can manifest themselves in an improved ROE is if you actually use that excess capital and buy back stock. So, I think that is what I'm struggling with – trying to reconcile your comments about capital management and not necessarily buying back stock with the 17% to 20% ROE, the math doesn't quite work, unless you actually do something on the capital front. Particularly if the 12% earnings growth estimate is what you are sticking by, do you sort of follow where I'm going with this, that the math doesn't work?

Yes, I understand your anxiety. I would go back to my comment with respect to loan loss provisions and the cost of impaired loans coming down, because I think that does have an impact, and I do think that as you deploy retained earnings and deploy the capital more efficiently that we currently have in our balance sheet, we are going to have higher earnings on the same capital base.

So, the final thing then is how long would it take, do you figure, to get to the 17%?

Those are medium-term targets. So, I said my view of medium-term is over the next three years. So, I think that’s a reasonable timeframe.

That’s helpful. Thanks, Bill.

Yes.

The next question is from Brad Smith of Stonecap Securities. Please go ahead.

Thanks very much. I had a couple questions about credit. In the commentary, you were sounding quite optimistic about the outlook for credit. And I believe that was reflected in your guidance going forward. The numbers from the quarter, though, sort of tell me a little bit of a different story. I was wondering if you could provide some clarity. Specifically, I was looking at the jump in consolidated formations, which you almost doubled to 461 million, and are now at a level that was only surpassed by Q4 2009. I was also thinking in terms of the outlook for credit, but your decision to accelerate your PCLs in the fourth quarter and hold your allowance levels steady. And then finally, I was wondering if I could get somebody to provide a little bit of color on the impaired loans at the end of the quarter in the domestic portfolios, which were up 7%, probably one of the bigger jumps I've seen.

Okay, Brad. I think all of those questions were directed to Tom Flynn.

Thank you, Tom.

You had a lot of questions there. So, I will try to tackle them. I guess in the outlook comment, we have tried to, to me, be more measured than optimistic and we talked about an expectation over the first half of next year. Provisions being in line give or take with what we have seen over the last couple of quarters. And over the last couple of quarters, we have averaged about 235 million. We have said that there will be variability quarter-to-quarter. We wish that we had smooth curves to look at, but reality is you got some variability. So, I would suggest you average the last couple of quarters to think about where we are at now because Q3 was unusually low and Q4 popped out. And we think we are going to be around that territory for the next few quarters and then with luck, if the economy improves as people expect and unemployment starts to come down, we would hope for some improvement in the latter part of the year. On formations, same kind of a story, the formation number in Q3 was 242 which was materially lower than any number that we saw this year, and the number in Q4 was 461, which was the highest in the year, but basically equal with Q1. If you average those numbers out, you add about 350, and we think we will be running give or take around that level for the first part of next year. So, overall, we are seeing stability and improvement in places and the provisions came down more rapidly this year than we expected, which we said to you before. We think we are going to run around the current level for a few more quarters, and then hopefully we will have another leg down as things improve. In terms of Canadian formation number, it was up in the quarter. I don’t think it’s reflective of any broad-based weakness in the portfolios either on the commercial side or the consumer side. We happen to have had a couple of larger commercial accounts that went impaired in the quarter. And so, that resulted in the number going up, but it doesn’t feel like there is a fundamental shift underway. It’s more just a case of what I would refer to as variability around the trend.

Okay. Thank you very much. And just within terms of the consolidated formations, can you give us some sense of a split between consumer and commercial on the 461?

I can. You have to work with me for a minute, but the Canadian formation number was 172 million, and of that, 13% is consumer. The U.S. formation number was 289, and of that, about 5% was consumer.

Okay. Terrific. Thanks so much.

Thank you.

Okay, thank you very much. Before we close, I want to turn the call over to our business heads and ask them to say a few words about the outlook for their respective businesses in 2011. And I am going to start with Tom Milroy and then we will hear from Gilles Ouellette, Ellen Costello, and Frank Techar. Over to you, Tom.

Thanks, Bill. Obviously we were pleased with the quarter and overall year and met with our expectations. As we look forward, we believe we are well positioned for a number of reasons. We are already seeing improved credit conditions and expect to reduce the level of provision for loan losses over the medium term. As the economy improves, there’s lots for corporate America and Canada to do, and as Bill said, we are expecting a pickup in exports. This shift will be very positive for all of our businesses, and we expect to see our clients pursuing transactions, capital investments, M&A etcetera. Our trading products businesses we believe are well positioned to take advantage of the opportunities as market conditions continue to improve. Obviously trading revenue is highly dependent on market conditions, but assuming we have a similar market to what we had in 2010, we would expect to see trading revenues in a similar range with quarterly variability. You probably noticed we made a significant investment in our U.S. business both in people and in our distribution capabilities, and while we are going to continue to invest, in 2011, we would expect to see our U.S. operations to deliver a meaningful increase in our results, bolstered by, we believe, an improving economy. And we have strong pipelines on both sides of the border. So, overall for the capital markets business, based on our view of the macro factors, we would expect growth across all of our businesses in line with the overall economy and in particular, better growth from our U.S. operations.

Great. Thanks very much, Tom.

Thanks, Bill. All our businesses are performing well and they have been improving as the years going on, and we are growing market share in all of these businesses. The wealth businesses are dependent on five things. First one is growth in U.S., and this year we grew our assets by 13%, and we have got a great momentum leading to 2011. It’s also dependent on levels of equity market, since about half of our business is fee-based, and we are expecting markets to keep on improving next year. And also, depending on transaction volumes, particularly in InvestorLine and in Nesbitt Burns PCD, and transaction volume is depending on the levels of market as we see levels improving, we expect transaction volumes improve also. Also very dependent on interest rates and although we don’t expect rates to move up in the early part of the year, we do expect to move up, and that should improve our spread revenues. And finally, we are dependent on sales of our insurance businesses, and we are both showing good growth. So, we are pretty optimistic about going into 2011.

Thanks. Ellen?

Thanks, Bill. I had two important highlights I want to touch on from 2010, and Bill already spoke to our AMCORE acquisition and how successful it has been. We added 34 branches, which as Bill correctly said, is about 10% to our network in two really important markets. We also have had great client retention and we are growing the base from there, which something Bill also touched on. On the synergy side, we closed 18 branches that overlapped with our Chicago network and as a result, of the synergies we were able to reduce FTE by about 50% in expenses with that. I just want to mention too that we talked a little bit about tuck-in acquisitions. Since 2006, we have added a third to our branch network of 109 branches. So, these tuck-ins do add up and add up to something more significant. We are now at 312 branches. Second point I wanted to mention is as you all know, we began talking about moving some of our commercial customers from capital markets to P&C earlier this year, and we completed that in the second half of the year. These customers are primarily focused on lending and cash management and might have the occasional capital markets need. So, we make sure they are well-served there. We see this as a real opportunity for us to take advantage of the market opportunity to accelerate growth with what we see as being a business-led recovery. We have significantly expanded our professional calling group, our capabilities in industry sectors and our client facing our professionals. The group is fully integrated out calling in the market and have good pipelines already. And also, we have improved our visibility in the markets, renew advertising campaigns in the Mid-West markets in which we compete.…

Thanks, Ellen. Over to you, Frank?

Okay. Thanks, Bill. I think I touched on a couple of these messages earlier and responding to the questions, but I will just reinforce a couple of them. We have come off a very strong year with 10.3% revenue growth and as Bill mentioned earlier, using actual losses, net income growth of 22.5% for the year which stacks up pretty well relative to the competition. It’s fair to say that we have a lot of confidence in the path that we are on right now, and there is no doubt we have made up some ground on the competition over the past few years. We have seen broad-based growth across all of our segments and geographies and maybe most importantly, our customer loyalty scores in both the consumer segment and the commercial segment continue to improve. Having said that, as we look forward, the areas of growth for us, we will change a bit, and I mentioned this earlier, a little softening of the growth on the consumer side offset I believe by stronger growth on the commercial side of our business and we are well positioned in commercial with strong capabilities, momentum in our balance sheet growth and revenue growth at this point in time to take advantage of it. We are going to continue to invest in our business in our strategic agenda over the next 12 months, in particular, focusing on improving our distribution capabilities, continuing our branch investments, investing in our specialized sales forces and investing in our telephone banking capabilities through our state-of-the-art contact center, which we have built here in Toronto. We are going to invest in our online capabilities in 2011, and commercial is going to be a big focus as I have already mentioned. So, expectations are we can keep it up. We have a lot of confidence in our business. We have an objective and that is to perform well relative to the competition, and whatever the environment throws at us in 2011, we think we are going to be successful.

Great, thanks very much, Frank. Well, let me recap my comments with respect to medium-term financial performance. Overtime, for EPS, we are looking average annual growth of 12%, which is an increase from previous guidance or objective rather of 10%, cash operating leverage of at least 1.5%, down from 2% reflecting the increased investment spend we have been discussing, an ROE range objective from 17% to 20% and maintaining strong capital ratios. In sum, we are very confident in the path we are on and in our ability to grow. 2010 was a year of strong operating performance and the results speak for themselves. We are pleased with the performance of our businesses and at the same time, this management team and our 38,000 employees understand there is much more to be done. Thanks again for joining us today. We look forward to reporting to you after the first quarter and good afternoon everyone.

Thank you. The conference is now ended. Please disconnect your lines at this time, and we thank you for your participation.