Dave Deno
Analyst · Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead
Well, thanks Liz, and good morning, everyone. If you have reviewed our earnings release that we filed this morning you have noted that there are several important details embedded in our Q4 results in our 2014 guidance. I will spend a good deal of time on today's call working through those items one by one to provide transparency into our results. With that in mind I'll kick off discussion around sales and profit performance for the quarter. As a reminder, when I speak to net income and EPS I'll be referring to adjusted numbers and excludes certain costs and benefits. Please see our earnings release reconciliations between our adjusted non-GAAP metrics and their most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measures. We also provide a discussion of the nature of each adjustment. Our fourth quarter financial highlights versus the prior year are as follows. Adjusted diluted earnings per pro forma share were $0.27 versus $0.20 in 2012, an increase of nearly 35%. GAAP diluted earnings per share for the quarter increased to $0.46 versus $0.15 last year [Technical Difficulty] versus $25.8 million for the fourth quarter a year ago, GAAP net income [Technical Difficulty] versus $18.4 million in 2012. Comparable domestic restaurant sales at our core domestic concepts increased 1.4% all traffic increased 0.3%. Our Q4 comp sales results included a favorable trading date impact of 0.4%. We maintained a positive gap to the KNAPP-TRACK, with an estimated 320 basis point beat per comp sales and a 400 basis point beat on traffic. We have out passed the segment sales for 17 consecutive quarters. Total revenues increased 5.2% with $1.1 billion adjusted restaurant level operating margins were 15.9% this year versus 15.4% a year ago. On a GAAP basis restaurant level operating margins for Q4 were 14.8% this year versus 15.4% a year ago. Let's break that down by line item. First, cost of sales increased to 32.7% from 32.4% in 2012. The increase was primarily driven by increases in beef and shrimp costs and a change in product sales mix. The increase was partially offset by productivity initiatives and menu price increases. On an adjusted basis labor and other related expenses decreased to 27.6% from 28.6% in 2012. The changes in labor costs included favorability in health insurance due to lower claims activity, productivity savings from the new labor model and reduced expense associated with our managing partner deferred compensation programs. We also got the margin benefit of higher sales. This was partially offset by higher kitchen and service labor associated with the weekday lunch roll outs. On a GAAP basis labor and other related expenses increased to 28.8% from 28.6% in 2012. This increase was primarily driven by an additional $12 million of expense related to the IRS payroll tax audit. I will explain this expense in more detail in just a minute. Finally, restaurant operating expenses increased to 23.7% from 23.5% in 2012. The change was mainly driven by higher advertising expense as well increases in operating supplies and utilities. This was partially offset by lower general liability insurance claim activity AUB leveraging and productivity improvements. Now let's turn to G&A. After taking into account the related non-GAAP adjustments outlined in the earnings release, G&A was $67.3 million in Q4 versus $69.1 million a year ago. The nearly 3% decline was primarily driven by lower corporate and field-related incentive compensation. General GAAP and administrative costs were $69.5 million versus $66.6 million last year. This increase was primarily due to a lapping of a $3.5 million gain recorded in Q4, 2002 associated with the 2009 sales of our Cheeseburger in Paradise concept. Unfavorability also came from costs incurred in 2013 as a result of our acquisition of the Brazil business. We adjusted for both of these items in our non-GAAP metrics. Fourth quarter adjusted operating income margin increased to 6.1% from 5.1% in 2012. For the full year our adjusted operating income increased to 6.4% from 5.9% in 2012 inline with our guidance. As Liz indicated earlier this is a 130 basis point improvement from where we ended 2011 and is a 50 basis point improvement versus 2012. We continue to make meaningful progress to our long term operating margin improvement goals. In the quarter, we had three primary [Technical Difficulty] items that were removed from our adjusted net income and adjusted EPS. The first is a one-time non-cash gain of $37 million from our Brazil acquisition. This adjustment is recorded on our statement of the income as gain on re-measurement of equity invested investment. This P&L line falls below operating income. The second item was our decision to close 22 under performing restaurants. As we reevaluate our portfolio for relocation opportunities we identified under performing locations that are not good candidates for relocation. Their closure optimizes our portfolio and allows us to focus our efforts on up to a 100 relocation opportunities previously identified for OpEx. The closings also set us up for further new Outback development. Decision resulted in $18.7 million non-cash asset impairment charge booked on provision for impaired assets and restaurant closings on the statement of income. The write-down does include five restaurants and sale lease back for mortgage packages. This increase is the average write-off for restaurant. The impairment charge lowered GAAP operating income margin by approximately 180 basis points in Q4 and is the primary reason why on a GAAP basis Q4 operating margin decreased from 5.4% in Q4, 2012 to 3% in the fourth quarter of this year. Again, the $37 million gain from Brazil fall below operating income in our P&L it was not included in our operating margin. The third adjustment is a $12 million expense related for ongoing IRS payroll tax audit. If you recall in the third quarter we recorded a $5 million contingency income of payroll tax audit. This audit was determined our share of FICA taxes on unreported cash chips received by employees in 2010. The IRS briefly informed us that they were expanding this audit to include 2011 and 2012, it was necessary to book an additional payroll tax contingency. We are working with the IRS to resolve this matter and are confident that the processes that we put in place at the end of 2012 address this matter. The $12 million expense has a corresponding adjustment in the income tax provision that completely offset the additional labor and other related expense in 2013. As a result of the associated income tax benefit, recording of the liability has no impact in net income. However, given the prior period nature of this expense and impact to operating margin we are adjusting it out of our results. For the fourth quarter, our adjusted effective tax rate was 22% compared to 10.8% for Q4 of last year. The normalized rate of 22% used in the 2013 does not include the tax benefit for the release of the valuation allowance in Q2 and the impact of other items that are not considered indicative of on going operations. And one last note on Q4 results. We have previously discussed our intent to improve our debt metrics and build a strong balance sheet. I'm pleased to announce that the fourth quarter, in the fourth quarter we paid down an additional $40 million on our outstanding term loan obligation. Now let's turn to 2014, our overall guidance is at least 15% adjusted net income in a comparable basis is lower than our 20% long-term target. There are two reasons for this, the first is the reflection of the difficulties based in the casual dinning industry and we expect another challenging year for this segment. Having said that, we firmly believe that we will continue to significantly outperform the casual dinning segment in sales by 200 to 300 basis points in 2014. The second reason is our decision to increase funding in key growth areas. This includes more funding for our business in China and other important initiatives such as digital marketing. Before I being with the guidance it's important to discuss two very important changes to our financial reporting in 2014. First, we released an 8-K on January 21st that details the consolidation of Brazil and impacts on Bloomin' Brands financial statements. After reviewing that document you will see significant profit generated by Brazilian restaurants, however, because of the non-cash amortization of new tangibles we will not get the benefit of this profit in our Bloomin' Brands GAAP net income. As a result, we have decided to exclude this amortization impact from our 2014 adjusted net income to give investors a better sense of earnings power of Brazil. On the November call, we discussed other potential opportunity to address this amortization but after further consideration we have determined that this non-GAAP presentation provides a better presentation of the ongoing profitability of our business. The annual impact of this adjustment is approximately $6.5 million pretax will be added back to our adjusted net income in 2014. This adjustment is expected to add approximately 3/10ths to our adjusted EPS guidance for 2014. The second large change is probably moving from a calendar based year to a 52, 53-week [Technical Difficulty] 2014. As noted in our 8-K filed on January 6, the conversion to this new calendar results from the loss of three high volume days at the end of 2014. A loss to these high volume days is expected to have the following impact in our 2014 results. Total revenues will be reduced by approximately $43 million. Net income will be reduced by approximately $8 million. And diluted earnings per share will be reduced by approximately $0.06. The guidance we are providing reflects the Brazil acquisition and the new accounting calendar. We have also included a table in our press release that will assist you as we walk through the items. In this table, we provide with a 2014 calendar year guidance would have been for these financial measures as well as our outlook for the 52 to 53-week fiscal year because we have historically reported our results in a calendar basis, we have chosen to provide calendar year guidance that excludes the impact of our conversion to the 52, 53 week fiscal year guidance discussed. The calendar year guidance provide you the most comparable way to understand the expected growth in our -- 2014 for our businesses. However, it is provided for grounding purposes only, it will not be reported in any future earnings releases importantly we will use the 52, 53 week year fiscal year for reporting 2014 and beyond. Let me start with revenue guidance. Total company revenue is expected to increase approximately 8% to $4.45 billion on a calendar basis will be driven by the consolidation of our Brazil entity comp sales and planned new restaurant development. It also counts to the impact of the restaurant closure. On a 53-week fiscal year basis, our total revenue will be up approximately $43 billion lower. On the international front, the Brazil business continues to perform very well and we expect a very strong 2014. However, we did see softness in Korea during Q4 that is continuing into 2014. This is a result of deteriorating macro economic conditions and the need for 360 degree brand refresh. This work is currently underway. Adjusted EBITDA for the year is expected to be at least $508 million on a calendar basis, this represents an impressive 15% growth from 2013. On a 52, 53-week fiscal basis our adjusted EBITDA will be at least $493 million. Adjusted net income for the year is expected to be at least $164 million on a calendar basis. This represents growth of 15% from 2013. This will include an estimated $4.3 million post-tax amortization add-back for Brazil. On the 52, 53-week fiscal basis, our adjusted net income will be $8 million lower or at least $156 million -- $156 million on a calendar basis, on the 52, 53-week fiscal basis, our GAAP net income will be $8 million lower or at least $148 million. Adjusted diluted EPS for the year is expected to be at least $1.27 on a calendar basis, this is an increase of 14% from 2013. The difference between adjusted net income growth and adjusted EPS is driven by an anticipated increase in our share count. This also includes an approximate $0.03 amortization add-back for Brazil. On the 52, 53-week fiscal basis our adjusted diluted EPS will be $0.06 lower or at least $1.21. The absolute EPS will be at least $1.21 on a calendar basis. On a 52, 53-week fiscal year basis, our GAAP diluted EPS will be $0.06 lower or at least $1.15. And finally, we will be adjusting for anticipated lease liability and store closure expense of approximately $3.1 million after-tax in our adjusted metrics. Most of this expense will be in Q1. This is the remaining expense from our decision to close 22 restaurants. I will now turn our attention to the items included in our guidance that will not be impacted by the conversion to the 52, 53-week fiscal calendar. We expect our blended restaurant sales counts for our four domestic brands grow by 1% to 2% with positive traffic. This increase is based on ongoing menu and promotional innovation continued month expansion and additional restaurant remodel. We are not relying on a meaningful improvement in segment trends to lift our 2014 results. Strength of commodities, we expect inflation will grow 2% to and 4%, this include beef inflation in the range of 3% to 5% and seafood inflation of 10% to 12%, which is largely driven by higher shrimp costs. We expect to see improvements in other protein cost which will help to offset these pressures. We are currently contracted for approximately 68% of our total buy for 2014 which is consistent with where we typically stand at this time of year. Our productivity goal in 2014 will once again be at least $50 million. You can expect 40% to 45% of our total savings from labor; 40% to 45% of savings in food cost and the remainder from other operating expenses in G&A. General and administrative expenses are expected to come in between $295 million and $305 million in 2014. This represents a large change from 2013 and I want to provide some details on this increase. First, the consolidation of our Brazil entity accounts for the largest portion of the change in addition 2013 was an abnormally favorable year in health insurance especially in catastrophic claims for employees at the corporate office. We do not believe it is prudent to assume a continuation of this level of favorability and return to previously absorbed levels of expenses reflected in our guidance. Another driver of increase in G&A is higher merit based compensation expenses in 2014. Since we did not meet our sales goals in 2013, we had favorability intensive compensation expense. We have to reset these expenses up in 2014 and this will result in higher overhead. Finally, beside three items noted above we remain committed to zero overhead growth in our support functions. We will, however, continue to invest in infrastructure and overhead to support our key growth initiatives. So there will be some increases in G&A spending as result of this investment. The examples include investments in technology and investments to support our growth plans outside the United States. We anticipate an adjusted effective income tax rate in the range of 27% to 29%. This increase over 2013 is primarily due to higher effective income tax rate in Brazil as well as reduced leverage on our domestic FICA tip credit. We estimate that 2014 four year capital expenditures will be between $250 million and $280 million. This includes the consolidation of Brazil capital expenditures. System-wide [Technical Difficulty] on 2014 is expected to be in the range of 55 to 60 restaurants with approximately 50% in the U.S. and 50% international. Bonefish Grill will continue to be our lead development vehicle in the U.S. and Brazil represents the majority of our international development. Now we would like to comment briefly on Q1. Our stated policy is to only provide annual guidance. However, there are three items expected to have material impacts in our Q1 financials that are appropriate to mention. First, we believe Q1 to be our – will be our most difficult sales quarter for the year. For January, the KNAPP track casual dining index was down 2.6 for sales comp and negative 4.4% for traffic. Bad weather has put a significant pressure on industry sales. Weather has impacted Bloomin' Brands comps by approximately 200 basis points through February. Having said that, we expect to continue to markedly outperform KNAPP with our core domestic Q1 comp sales ranging from approximately negative 1% to positive 1%. Second, our annual managing partner's conference is in the second quarter of 2014, last year the conference was held in the first quarter. The cost of the conference is approximately $3 million. Finally, as you may recall, in the first quarter of 2013, our tax rate was lower than normal at 14.1%. As of Q1 2013, we had not yet released the valuation allowance in our deferred tax asset. The released happened in the second quarter of 2013 and the favorability seen in Q1 of 2013 reversed in Q2. As you look at Q4, Q1 2014 please remember that this will have a significant impact on quarterly comparisons as we expect our Q1 tax rate in 2014 to be roughly inline with our full year guidance of 27% to 29% for our tax rate. In summary, we were very pleased with the way we finished 2013. Our brands held up very well in a difficult environment and we reached our profit goals for the year. We have a strong plan to continue – we have a strong plan to continue to grow our business and are looking forward to another successful year in 2014. And with that we'll open it up to the phone line for questions.