Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the BankUnited Inc. First Quarter 2022 Earnings Call. At this time, all participant lines are in listen-only mode. After the presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions]. Please be advised, today's conference may be recorded. [Operator Instructions] I’d now like to hand the conference to your host today, Susan Greenfield, Corporate Secretary. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Liz. Good morning, and thank you for joining us today on our first quarter 2022 earnings conference call. On the call this morning are; Raj Singh, our Chairman, President and CEO; Leslie Lunak, our Chief Financial Officer; and Tom Cornish, our Chief Operating Officer. Before we start, I'd like to remind everyone that this call may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that reflect the company's current views with respect to, among other things, future events and financial performance. Any forward-looking statements made during this call are based on the historical performance of the company and its subsidiaries, or on the company's current plans, estimates and expectations. The inclusion of this forward-looking information should not be regarded as a representation by the company that the future plans, estimates or expectations contemplated by the company, will be achieved. Such forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties and assumptions, including, without limitation, those relating to the company's operations, financial results, financial condition, business prospects, growth strategy and liquidity, including as impacted by external circumstances outside the company’s direct control. The company does not undertake any obligation to publicly update or review any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future developments, or otherwise. A number of important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements. Information on these factors can be found in the company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, and any subsequent quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, or current report on Form 8-K, which are available at the SEC's website, www.sec.gov. With that, I'd like to turn the call over to Raj.

Thank you, Susan. Welcome, everyone. Thank you for joining us for our earnings call. Let me start by some comments about the economy, our markets that we are in, and generally how we see the outlook for things that we don't control but impact our business. Then we'll get into our numbers, and then Tom, and Lester, will follow me with more detail. So, the Main Street view, which is the view that we get from talking to our clients day in and day out, is actually very healthy. We are seeing a robust economy in Florida, have been for quite some time, and even New York has improved quite a bit over the last couple of quarters. So, we have nothing really to complain on the economic front. Growth is strong. Personal and business balance sheets are strong and healthy. Of course, the usual issues with labor constraints and inflation, that's nothing new, but overall, home prices are up. Residential markets are robust. So, the mainstream view that I will bring to you at this time is very healthy and strong. Then there's the other view, which is the capital markets view, which we get by looking at our Bloomberg screens all day long these days, is, this was a very volatile quarter, and probably the most volatile quarter in quite some time. So, especially in fixed income, we saw obviously the yield curve go up to where it is, but we also saw spread widening pretty much across the board in fixed income assets. So, that gives us a little bit of pause when we think about sort of the medium to long-term as in maybe next year that there may be a slowdown. Again, it's - that can change and we'll keep monitoring it, but those are…

Great. Thank you very much, Raj. So, to follow up on Raj’s comments on Atlanta and the Dallas expansion, there's a number of other strategic initiatives that we have in place for the year that we've also made some key hires. We've brought in a sponsor finance leader in our New York market, focusing on sponsor finance business. We've not had a dedicated effort on the sponsor finance area previously. So, we're excited about that. We've recently hired a new trade finance and supply chain finance leader in the Miami market, in Florida, and New York, and the Southeast are great export markets for us. So, we are optimistic about that. And as Raj said, New York is on the move and we have hired a middle market banking leader for the Long Island market. We like very much what's happening in middle market banking in Long Island that it gives us a great opportunity to increase our portfolio and client base in the Long Island market. So, a lot of good successes on the hiring front over the last couple of months that we're optimistic about. We'll see through the results for the rest of the year. Covering deposits and loans just a little bit more, as Raj mentioned, total deposits declined by $897 million. Most of that runoff was in what we believed to be interest rate-sensitive accounts, broker deposits, and interest-bearing accounts that are higher on the beta side. We've been working over the last few quarters in awaiting the interest rate rises that we expect to see and moving out of some of this activity. Some of it happened a little bit in the fourth quarter. Some of it got delayed into the first quarter of 2022. But our strategy continues to be around very solid…

Actually, Leslie, let me just interrupt, just to add a little thing. We did see a fair amount of dislocation in the fixed income market, and we were opportunistic, especially in the month of March, we stepped in and deviated from what was our original plan. The original plan was not to grow the bond portfolio this quarter. In fact, the plan was to shrink it, but we looked opportunistically and we saw spreads that are at really amazingly wide spreads. So, we stepped in and we grew the bond portfolio all towards the end of the quarter. So, you don't see the impact of that in the P&L really this quarter. You will next quarter. But that's just an explanation on why the bond portfolio grew, totally opportunistic. Nothing else.

Thanks, Raj. Yes, thank you. So, a couple of highlights from the quarter, a little more detail around the numbers. The NIM increased this quarter to 2.50 from 2.44 last quarter. To break that down a little bit, the yield on investment securities increased to 173 from 154. The duration of this portfolio is short. So, we're already starting to see the impact of rising rates and widening spreads on the portfolio yield as new purchases are coming on at higher spreads. Slowing speeds on premium securities also positively impacted the yield on securities for the quarter by about eight basis points. We saw the yield on loans decline to 336 this quarter from 350 last quarter. I wouldn't say any one single factor drove that, but at a high level, we still saw for most of Q4 and Q1 of 2022, loans that were coming on, were coming on at a little bit lower yield than loans that were running off the portfolio. We didn't see this move in rates till very late in Q1. And we did start to see an inflection point towards the end of March in terms of the yield at which new loans are putting on. So, we should start to see this go the other way as we move forward through 2022. The total cost of deposits declined by two basis points quarter-over-quarter, and the cost of interest-bearing deposits declined by three basis points. I will point out that we have locked in some term deposits in anticipation of rising rates. We've issued some callable CDs and some brokerage CDs, and put some cashflow hedges on against the deposit book. If we exclude all of those instruments from the cost of interest-bearing deposits, it would have been about three basis points lower for…

Thanks, Leslie. Let's just open it up for questions.

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Brady Gailey with KBW.

Hey, good morning. This is Will Jones on for Brady. How are you, guys?

Hey, good, Will. How are you?

Hey, great. So, just wanted to start with the buyback. You guys were obviously very active again this quarter. Raj, Leslie, you’ve been active and very active in 3Q, very active in 4Q. Raj, your comments seem to indicate that there's not going to be any slowdown on the buyback. I mean, could we still expect the buybacks to be at similar magnitudes as in prior quarters? And I just wanted to get your thoughts on how you think about your excess capital position and whether there's any limiting factors in there.

Yes. I think in the short to medium term, I don't think there's anything there. I think long-term, you always have to look at growth prospects. You have to look at economy. You have to look at a number of things. But in the short-term, defined as the next three, four months, I don't see really much of that changing. So, that's why I say that I think we’ll get done sometime over the next few weeks with the authorization we have in place. And we expect to go back to the board for another $150 million. You know we get authorizations $150 million at a time. We don't do a big one. This gives the board chance to kind of look at it again, make decision again, keeping in mind what has changed with the situation. But I fully expect - I think we have a board meeting in the middle of May, actually a shareholder meeting in the middle of May. It might be at that, or if not that, maybe shortly thereafter, I think we'll be asking for another authorization.

All right. Could you just remind us how much you have left on your current authorization?

At the end of the quarter. Leslie, do you have that number? How much did we?

I can find it in just a minute.

Yes, no worries. We can circle back if needed.

I'll find it. Carry on. I’ll throw it out there when I find it.

That'd be great. Thank you so much. And then just thinking bigger picture, I mean, I know we haven't touched on BankUnited 2.0 in a while. I think as of early last year, you'd already achieved the $40 million of cost saves and were working on the $20 million of revenue synergies. Could you just update us on where that stands today, or maybe if that's already played out? And then as you think longer term or maybe more intermediate term, growth is picking up. You're having a nice portfolio shift. Rates are moving higher, and we're just in an environment to see some nice positive operating leverage. Have you guys had discussions over internal profitability targets? And do you think something like a 1% ROE could be plausible in the near-term?

That is the near-term goal, is to hit 1% ROE, double digit ROE on a consist basis. I mean, we hit that with - from time to time, but to be consistently above that is the short-term target. A lot depends on what happens. Listen, margin is going to expand. How much exactly, time will tell, but margin will expand. We're not betting the ranch on rates going up, but we are slightly asset-sensitive. So, margin expansion will help get us closer to that. And it is - the last two years of this pandemic, it didn't do any permanent damage to the balance sheet for us or for most banks, but what it did was, that opportunity cost of not having grown our C&I business, not having sort of improved our asset mix, that is the real cost of kind of slowing us down in what batch we were on to achieving higher profitability. Now that the pandemic feels almost behind us, I don't think it'll be ever fully behind us, but for the most part feels behind us and we’re returning to normal, it is to pick up and those lost 18 months in terms of C&I growth, CRE growth, to actually execute on that and build margin and build revenue and build profitability

Yes. Raj, just to interject, at the end of the quarter, there was $94 million left in the buyback authorization.

Yes.

Well, there’s your answer.

Hey, great. No, all very helpful. Thank you so much.

Our next question comes from Ben Gerlinger with Hovde Group.

Hey, good morning, everyone. Curious, I know that you guys have had the expansion into Atlanta and then soon Texas. I think Raj said that you've actually booked your first loan in Atlanta. I was curious if you had any intermediate goals. I know you have a team that you're putting together. What can really be in shape of Atlanta relative to broader BankUnited? Like, is there a loan portfolio metric you would like to see or have a balance that by the end of the three years?

Yes. So, Ben, we have internally, obviously a plan and targets for the team that has been hired, and their incentives are tied to that. So, they have targets, but we have not disclosed them. In fact, for any business that we've started, we've never disclosed exactly what we're trying to do in the short, medium, long-term. And - but I will say this much, that if you look back at any business we've started, we've never come out, especially on the lending side of the business, and said we're going to do hundreds of millions of dollars right off the bat. I don't think that's prudent. I don't think you would want us to do that. So, in the first year of these initiatives, they don't move the needle for the company. They're small and they don't move the needle. But over two, three, four years, they certainly become very important part. Look at Orlando, look at Jackson, look at our mortgage warehouses, all of these things generally the takeoff is slow, but once we are comfortable, once you've gone through a cycle and audit and exam cycle, we get the confidence to say, okay, let's get into a higher gear. So, I would expect more growth next year than this year. But - and by the way, for Texas, just to clarify, I've said this in the past, that is more a deposit play, at least in the short-term, and not a loan play. Atlanta is both. So, it's a full-service play. So - but I don't want to throw out numbers. Internally, obviously we have numbers, especially for the team that has been brought on. They have their target they have to hit over the next year, two, and three, but I don't think they are going to move the needle for the company in 2022.

Got you. Okay. No, that's very fair. Leslie, if we could just take a minute here, talk about the margin. I think the forward curve is expecting saying last - at last check, it was like 50, 50, 50 over the next three Fed meetings. And when you think about the margin today, is it fair to say that the gain that we just saw linked-quarter is something that we can kind of expect over the next couple of quarters, or is this outside improvement - go ahead.

So, I would say over the rest of the year, I feel more confident now than I felt when we spoke last about margin expansion. I don't know that the second quarter we'll see as much margin expansion as the first quarter saw. And I - honestly you know this, Ben, I don't really think about this on a quarter-by-quarter basis, but I think we'll see good expansion over the rest of 2022. I still tend to think you'll see more of it in the back half, just as commercial loans get added to the balance sheet, as higher spreads - at higher spreads, and begin to have more of an impact on the margin. But I do expect further expansion over the course of the rest of the year. I'm not going to try to pinpoint exactly what quarter we're going to see how much of it in.

Got you. Okay. No, that's fair. Directionally though, that's good. And then if I could sneak one more in about expenses. Historically, you guys have had 1Q has always kind of been a bit of the high-water mark, and I know you gave guidance last quarter. It really encased the looming wage inflation. So, I think that was prudent on your guidance, but when you guys think about the additional hires, is that kind of baked in to previous guidance?

Yes. We still think - we still feel very good about the previous guidance on the mid to high single digit guidance that we gave around non-interest expense in January. We still feel confident in that guidance.

Got you. Okay. I appreciate it. Thanks, guys.

Our next question comes from Brock Vandervliet with UBS.

Good morning. Thanks for the question. Raj, I wanted to go back to your comment on warehouse, one of the few optimistic comments on this business. For example, TCBI is guiding down about 30% for the year. What gives you the confidence, I guess specifically, that we see a seasonal uptick in the second, third quarter?

I think the business has - the mortgage origination business is now almost virtually a purchase business. There's no refi. I think the refi business got totally flushed out of the system probably four months ago when rates really started to rise. So, the purchase business is still pretty decent. Now, there's a chance that if rates keep rising the way they are, that the purchase market will be impacted as well. We don't - if rates stabilize where they are, at 5% mortgage rate, while it sounds terribly high compared to where it was in December, it's still not that crazy in terms of killing the purchase market. But if this goes up, it can impact the purchase market too. But for us, mortgage warehouse is one of the many spigots, right? We have all these spigots of lending, I call them, and it's a - on a $35 billion sheet, it’s $700 million in outstanding. So, for that business line and for the people who are in that, obviously, it is everything. We look at what happens to utilization on an hour-by-hour basis. But for us as a company, even if we're off a little bit here or there, it doesn't really impact the numbers that much, because it's not the tail wagging the dog. It's still one of the many businesses we have. So, I could be off. Maybe it doesn't return to normal, but I'm looking at where utilization is now, and I went back and I looked at every March from the time we started the business. It kind of feels like exactly where March is supposed to be. The last two years were the exception, but we're always in the 30$ to 40% range in March, and then by June, it starts to be in the 55-ish range. In September, it holds up into the mid-50s as well. And December, it starts to peter down just a little bit. That's sort of a very, very consistent curve of utilization year after year after year, with the exception of the last two years. So, I'm looking at that and saying, it looks like it's returned to normal, but there is a chance that the purchase volumes will also come down. If the 30-year rate goes to 6%, which it could, seeing how fast it has come to five or even higher, yes, you could see an impact, and utilization may not go back up. But even if it doesn't, if it goes to only 40% or 45%, it's not that much of a - that big a business for us.

Yes. Raj, I’m dating myself here, but I still remember my first mortgage. It was 12%,

But I would also emphasize Raj’s comment that our commitment level remains strong. So, we actually expect our commitments will go up in the second quarter. And I think part of it is, we remain well positioned in the relationships we're in. Sometimes in this business, contracts, people consolidate lines. We're not seeing that in our client base. Our commitment levels are staying strong and even growing a little bit.

Okay. And just as a follow up there on the loan side, you toss that color on warehouse in the pot, what should we think of - potentially with C&I utilization increasing later in the year, what should we be thinking about in terms of just total loan growth on your - how should we think about that?

Yes. Outside of the warehouse business, the C&I utilization levels are increasing slowly but steadily. So, over the last six months, we've seen every month a few basis points up and up and up. It is still far from normal. It is - I would say we’re maybe halfway to normal from the bottom that we saw at the beginning of last year. So, there is still room for improvement. It's hard to predict because it's so much tied to what happens with supply chain disruptions. And I don't want to go out too much on a limb and say it'll return to normal by the end of the year, but I think we will see improvement from where it is today, because now we've had about five, six months of consistent improvement every month a little bit at a time.

Yes. I would also add, that we guided in January to mid to high single digits total loan growth for the year ex-PPP, which at this point actually has become pretty irrelevant. And we haven't changed that guidance.

Okay, great. Excellent. Thanks for the questions.

Our next question comes from Jared Shaw with Wells Fargo.

Hey, good morning. Looking at the commercial real estate, do you think we've hit the inflection point there and should we start to expect to see some growth return to CRE?

Yes.

And that's …

We expect this to be a growth year for CRE, and it'll be our first growth year in CRE in the aggregate since 2017. So, we're pretty excited about that. All this - we spent many years kind of running down that multifamily portfolio in New York. So, and we do expect this 2022 to be a CRE growth year.

And will any of that be New York City or New York City multifamily, or is it sort of just all throughout the franchise?

It's in New York City multifamily, but not like the old days. It is much more widespread. It is - I'll tell you what it is not. It's not retail and it's not CBD, central business district, office. So, it is a lot of other. It's multifamily in both geographies. It is industrial. It's warehouse. It is some office, some medical office space, some suburban office, and even a little bit of retail when it makes sense, but it’s really on a sort of exception basis. So, it is - there's no one asset class that I would point to. So, New York multifamily, yes, there'll be some, but not a lot.

Yes. I would also add that when you look at the differences in the portfolio, the level of sponsors that are coming back into the market the last six to eight months, and that's what we're seeing in our pipelines, it is a level of sponsorship that we feel very good about. Throughout most of last year, what you saw in the market was really kind of short-term bottom fishers looking for deals. The entry level point now and the loans that we have in the pipeline that I think will certainly lead to growth, especially in New York, are serious long-term investors in the market and very serious sponsors. We're very happy with the quality of what we're seeing.

Okay, that's good color. Thanks. And then sort of looking at funding and deposits, what are some of your expectations for deposit changes as we go forward? Obviously, your loan to deposit ratio is still much lower than historic levels. Should we continue to see deposit migration and using the FHLB to fill in where needed?

No. I think what - so first and foremost, we're not letting up on our DDA growth effort. So, we want to keep bringing in new business. We've had a lot of success with it, and maybe we don't want to get off that discipline. So, let's start there. So, DDA growth should continue. I will add a caveat to that. As rates rise and eventually ECRs rise, there will be a little bit of a headwind on DDA growth, not from new business coming into the bank, but just generally commercial customers not needing to keep that much in balances to avoid fees. So, that will be the headwind that us and every other commercial bank is going to have later in the year. But other than that, DDA growth - I can't tell you how busy we are in the back-office onboarding new clients. It's actually a problem that we're trying to address, that our people are working ungodly hours to onboard clients. That's the kind of problem you want to have, right? It's a good problem. In terms of the rest of the deposit book, I think the guidance we gave you is that we're looking for very little or no growth in total deposits, because eventually we want to kind of balance things out. We still have way more deposits than loans. So, that still stays. This increase in deposits, while we're all sort of modeling away what this will have - how this will all play out, it's going to be quite different from last time. Last time around, if you remember, slower or lower longer was the words used over and over again, describing how the Fed will lift off rates. Well, this time it's the opposite. It's higher, faster is the mantra. I mean, what took three years to do last time for the Fed, I think the Fed is going to do that in a matter of three quarters, if not less. So, I think we just have to kind of just be careful in a very fast-moving market to stay on top of that and predict what will happen with deposit flows. But overall, we're not defining success by growing the total deposit book, but by growing the DDA book. That's really what we're sending our people to do, and that's what I think builds long-term profitability, long-term franchise value for us. So, we're ready. Rates are going to rise in a couple of weeks. I think it'll be a different ball game. And then in June, I mean, we'll be about 125, 150 basis points of Fed funds. It'll be a different world by the time we talk to you in 90 days.

Yes. That's good. So, when you say little to no growth outside of DDA, is that little to no growth on the overall total balance?

Yes.

Total deposit - in total deposits. Correct, Jared. Yes.

Okay. So, the - so DDA will still go up, the others will go down, the bottom line will stay relatively unchanged?

That'd be our goal. And to your comment on FHLB, Jared, we’re still very comfortable with where wholesale funding is on our balance sheet and the loan to deposit ratios. That growth in FHLB advances this quarter was really a product of us being opportunistic right near the end of the quarter in taking advantage of some opportunities we saw in the bond market to put on some higher spread assets. And 90 days ago, we would've thought the bond portfolio would've amortized down this quarter. We ended up not including the fair value mark, growing that portfolio by $700 million. That's really the shift right there, from thinking it would be down $300 million, to it being up $700 million. That's your $1 billion in wholesale funding right there. And it was just an opportunistic move that we made right at the end of the quarter, and it'll even out.

Okay. And actually …

Does that make sense?

Yes, it does. And that sort of brings up my final question. When we look at the fair value adjustment, the $10.5 million charge through the securities gains, what did - so you must have obviously sold some securities.

No, we didn't sell anything. We didn't sell anything. That was a mark on some preferred stocks that we hold at the holding company. And because they are equities, the mark runs through the P&L. Oh, you mean sold something to partly offset that. Yes, we always - but we always do, and not with that intention. It's not like we sold something to offset that. Those sales were just incidental to the management of the bond portfolio. We always have a little bit of that every quarter.

Okay. Can you share what you - the balances that you sold and what the …

No, I don't have all those details in front of me.

All right. How about the - how about what you purchased? I guess, what was the purchase yield and purchase duration?

All right, hold on. Yes, I can tell you that. Give me just a minute. So, the yield on what we purchased for the quarter, Jared, was - for the whole quarter was in the mid twos, and what we sold was in the mid one. So, that gives you - towards the end of the quarter, what we were purchasing was in the mid threes.

Okay. And you don't have the total amount sold?

No, I don't

Let’s wait for the cash flow statement for that. Okay.

Yes.

All right. Thank you.

Our next question comes from Matthew Breese with Stephens.

Good morning. Hey, I wanted to go back to the mortgage discussion, but gain on sale. I'm sorry if I missed it in the prepared remarks, but what happened to cause the gain on sale item to be negative this quarter?

Yes. First of all, we don't have a mortgage origination in sale business. So, that's not what's going on. That really related to the sale of our Ginnie Mae EB - sales from our Ginnie Mae EBO portfolio. And we had kind of a weird phenomenon this quarter with the violent move in rates that we saw right at the end of the quarter. We had some loans that were kind of caught in the process of modification right then, and got modified at lower than prevailing rates, and ended up being repooled at a loss. That was kind of a weird sort of timing difference between when the loans were modified and when they were sold. The ones that are being modified now are being modified at much higher rates. But I will say the total yield on that EBO portfolio for the first quarter, including the interest yield and net loss, were still over 4%. So, we're pretty happy with that.

Got it. Okay. And then I was hoping you could share with us your thoughts around, or forecast on deposit betas and loan betas over the next, call it, 12 months,

I think where we sit with deposit betas, I would say we project them to be significantly lower than they were last time we were in a rising rate cycle. I hesitate to put a specific number out there, because any number I would put out there would be heavily assumption-driven. And our deposit book is a completely different deposit book than it was last time we were in a rising rate cycle. So, we don't have historical data that we can confidently base all of those assumptions on, but we are highly confident that we'll see lower betas than we saw last time around on the deposit side.

And at this point, have you increased pricing on any core or offered rates?

No, but that's coming. I mean, we haven't yet, but …

It'll definitely happen this quarter, given we're expecting 100 basis points move. So, the first move we then - maybe, Leslie, just to be absolutely correct, there may have been one or two clients where we had to do … Individual clients. Yes. I was thinking more across the board offered rates we have.

No, not across the board, but it will happen, I'm sure, this quarter.

Got it. Okay. The other thing, just turning to expenses was, the deposit insurance expense has been steadily declining. Where does it settle out? Are we at that right now?

Probably yes. Yes, I think so. I think this is probably a fairly decent run rate.

Okay. And then just last one for me, you had mentioned hiring a team out in Long Island. Obviously, those Metro New York City markets have been heavily disrupted by M&A. Just curious if that team hire was due to the disruption we've seen out there, or more from a traditional kind of big bank, larger bank employee, or set of employees?

I would say the latter. The augmentation that we've done to the Long Island team has predominantly been a larger bank long-term professionals that like our environment and our culture and the flatness of our organization and what we're about.

I will add to that though. There is a fair amount of noise in the New York market from all the M&A activity. We have interviewed several people, more than usual in the last few weeks and months.

Got it. Okay, great. That's all I had. Thanks for taking my questions.

Our next question comes from Chris Marinac with Janney Montgomery Scott.

Thanks. Good morning. Matt asked the same question I had about beta. So, let me just ask in a different perspective. So, the world's going to be different in 90 days and probably a year given rates, as Raj had mentioned. And I'm curious, do you think that the combination of higher interest rates and some continued expense operating leverage is really going to position BankUnited for much stronger profitability kind of as your return on assets, PP&R returns, et cetera. Just kind of wanted to get that out there.

The reason I have Leslie on the call is because she gets all the fun answers - the fun questions.

So, the high-level answer to your question is yes. But yes, I do think we're going to continue to see margin expansion. While we are going to see an increase in interest expense, I think the- not interest expense, in non-interest expense, operating expenses, I think the increase in revenue will outpace that. So, you will see operating leverage, and you will see increasing profitability. Now, I'm not making a prognostication for any one particular quarter when I say that, but I do think that'll be the trend.

No, I completely understand and I appreciate that. Just kind of wanted to clarify that. And, Raj, you had mentioned earlier about loan rates getting higher at the end of March. So, should we continue to see kind of your new onboarding loan rate strength in this quarter? And then, again, I'm sure it will be even higher come July and August.

Yes. I think the best piece of news over the last three months has really been the widening of spreads that we're seeing. And I have my own theory about this. I think the Fed stepping out of the market and letting private markets do their thing, is really, really the best news that we've had in the last 90 days. And which is why we had this violent movement in rates and spreads. I think overall, it's a good thing. Nobody likes to see their bond portfolio get marked like every bank has seen this quarter, but I think we're all doing better business and healthier business for that reason. I think, no matter what asset class you look at, and you can go look that up on Bloomberg, things have widened. Spreads have widened. I mean, rates are obviously where they are, but spreads have widened. I hope it sticks and it's not just momentarily. I mean, we've seen it now for about a month, wider spreads. And the loan portfolio, especially the commercial business, the news comes late over there of widening spreads, but it is getting there, and we're seeing it come into the business that we're doing. And if it sustains, that's good for us and for every other bank that is in the market. So, the Fed stepping out was the biggest news this quarter, and I think it's good news.

Great, Raj, thank you very much, and thank you, Leslie, as well. I appreciate it.

That concludes today's question-and-answer session. I'd like to turn the call back to Mr. Singh for closing remarks.

Thank you very much. Thanks, everyone, for joining us and we'll see you again in 90 days, if not sooner. Thanks. Bye.

This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.