Hello and welcome to BJ’s Restaurants, Inc. Q1 2023 Earnings Release and Conference Call. All participants are in a listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions] Please note this event is being recorded. I will now turn the conference over to Greg Levin, Chief Executive Officer and President. Please go ahead.

Thank you, operator. Good afternoon, everyone and welcome to BJ’s Restaurants fiscal 2023 first quarter investor conference call and webcast. I’m Greg Levin, BJ’s Chief Executive Officer and President and joining me on call today is Tom Houdek, our Chief Financial Officer. We also have Greg Lynds, our Chief Development Officer on hand for Q&A. After the market closed today, we released our financial results for the first quarter 2023 and you can view the full text of our earnings release on our website at www.bjsrestaurants.com. Our agenda today will start with Rana Schirmer, our Director of SEC Reporting, providing our standard cautionary disclosure with respect to forward-looking statements. I will then provide an update on our business and current initiatives and then Tom Houdek will provide some commentary on the quarter and the current operating environment. After that, we will open it up to questions. So Rana, please go ahead.

Thanks, Greg. Our comments on the conference call today will contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the company to be materially different from any future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by forward-looking statements. Investors are cautioned that forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and that undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Our forward-looking statements speak only as of today’s date, April 27, 2023. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements or to make any other forward-looking statements whether as a result new information, future events or otherwise unless required to do so by the securities laws. Investors are referred to the full discussion of risks and uncertainties associated with forward-looking statements contained in the company, filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Greg.

Thanks, Rana. BJ has delivered record first quarter revenue growing more than 14% compared to a year ago. Our Q1 results demonstrate the affinity guests have for the BJ's concept. We are unmatched in the industry given our polished casual positioning broad and varied menu with AUVs of more than $6 million and growing and are focused on delivering gold standard operational service and gracious hospitality to our guests each and every day. Given these factors and our unwavering commitment to taking care of our guests, our first quarter comparable restaurant sales and guest traffic continued to beat the industry as measured by black box. Our first quarter comparable restaurant sales increased 9% with our average weekly sales for the quarter rising above 121,000. We also made meaningful progress on our restaurant level margins, reaching 12.6% compared to 9.8% last year, despite continued inflationary pressures. Our ability to grow our top line and leverage the incremental sales is a testament to our restaurant management teams who are executing well against our sales driving and productivity initiatives while delivering gold standard service to our guests. The best way for us to continue improving our margins is by driving top line sales. Every additional sales dollar earned leverages the fixed elements of our restaurants cost structure and flows through to profit at a higher rate. To that end, we continue to focus on a variety of initiatives aimed at increasing top line sales. All of these sales initiatives must begin with a focus on the guest and how we can improve the guest dining experience at BJ's. We know from our consumer research that guests come to BJ's for an experiential dining experience that is rooted in our brew house theater environment with a best in class bar statement. Familiar foods made…

Thanks, Greg. And good afternoon, everyone. I will provide details of the quarter and some forward looking views. Please remember, this commentary is subject to the risks and uncertainties associated with forward looking statements as discussed in our filings with the SEC. In the first quarter, total sales grew 14% to $341.3 million. Because of the 53rd week in 2022 our Q1 period ends on April 4 this year as compared to March 29 last year. On a comparable restaurant basis sales increased by 9% over the same weeks as last year, calculated by shifting the 2022 period by one week to end on April 5. Without this shift and using our fiscal Q1, 2022 weeks is the comparable restaurant base our first quarter comparable restaurant sales rose 10.7%. The comparable sales improvement in conjunction with improving operating efficiencies and further progress on our cost savings initiatives contributed to BJ's first quarter margin improvement. Our restaurant level cashflow margins were 12.6% an improvement of 280 basis points compared to the prior year. Adjusted EBITDA was $25 million and 7.3% of sales in the first quarter which beat the prior year by $11.9 million, with a margin that was 290 basis points higher. We reported net income of $3.5 million and diluted net income per share of $0.15 on a GAAP basis for the quarter, each of which were more than double year ago levels. Our net income includes a $1.8 million income tax benefit, which includes the usual FICA tip credit and applying our estimated annual effective tax rate as compared to a $10.2 million income tax benefit from the same quarter a year ago. From a weekly sales perspective, we averaged more than 121,000 per week per restaurant in the first quarter or more than 12,000 higher than Q1…

Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. [Operator Instructions] Today's first question comes from Alexander Slagle with Jefferies. Please go ahead.

Hey, thanks. Congrats on the quarter. It looks like the you've been seeing some really strong non comp sales trends in the recent couple quarters I guess, with the new stores performing really well and trying to think about if we should expect those trends to continue that positive gap. And as you talk about the 4% to 5%, average weekly sales growth in 2Q should we be thinking about like a 2% to 3% same store sales metric underlying that.

Alex, I think the fortifies probably the reasonable comp sales. And this is a little bit of a reversal of Q1 in a way because it's an interesting question were in Q2 we actually end fiscal Q2 ends the week of July 4. And that's a low weekly sales average for us. So in a way, again, much like Q1 and it evens out from there, more or less. But we end up replacing a fairly high weekly sales into Q1 and put a low weekly sales into Q2. It's one of the reasons that we try to give a little bit more color around what last year's comp sales was of [180,900]. And the way to think about building your model would be 4% to 5% off of that number.

Okay, that makes sense. So the average weekly sales growth beyond that probably shouldn't be too significant beyond the comp for the balance of the year?

That's right, Alex. And in the second quarter, the weekly sales average growth will be right around the comp growth. We have seen about it could be 100 basis points extra that we're getting from the extra weekly sales from our non comp restaurants. But because of the shift that Greg mentioned, it gets it about in line for Q2. So it's that four to five should be both weekly sales growth as well as top growth in Q2.

Great. And the expectations for the holidays and events coming up Mother's Day and Graduations Day. I recall them being pretty strong last year. Is there anything different in terms of staffing or other year-over-year differences to consider as we roll over those?

No. I think we're obviously well staffed. I believe based on everything we're seeing in our business that will be more efficient, and more effective taking care of our guests this year than last year because of the maturity and our team members and being staffed up. I think at the same time, from a macro standpoint, there was a certain amount of excitement for guests to get back out and celebrate after two years of challenges around COVID. So I think from what we can control and execute, I think we'll do better. We continue to want to monitor the what I would call the macro side of it.

Okay. I'm not sure if you mentioned any changes in guests habits or anything with mix or appetizers, drinks, things like that, that you noticed over the last couple of months. But maybe just to remind us if there were any changes you noted?

Yes. I think in Tom's comment, he mentioned that we're seeing some really strong sales coming in late night at lunch. And I think some of that has to do with obviously the BJ's concept. We've got great lunch specials. We updated our lunch specials this year and the first quarter, introduce some new items that are becoming best sellers for us. We have seen I think in general party size, start to normalize a little bit, still a little bit better than where it was versus 2019 let's call it and our incidents are up versus kind of the 2019 timeframe. But as we looked at versus 2022 last year, we have seen a little bit of a slowdown and alcohol incidents. I think we mentioned that on the Q4 call. That's one area that we continue to watch. But generally everything else seems very consistent in our business. I don't know Tom has anything else to add?

Yes. I think we covered it. And just to be clear on the outperformance we've seen in lunch and late night those day parts do have slightly lower check. So that's we think of the incidence levels that Greg mentioned that that's a cause of it, we do have these day parts. And that's one great thing about BJ's, we drive sales in our restaurants starting at lunch all the way through late night. So these areas that have been down more from pre-COVID levels are recovering. But when the traffic comes back, it's a little headwind on the check side. So that's the dynamics at play there.

Got it. Thank you.

Thanks, Alex.

The next question comes from Jeffrey Bernstein with Barclays. Please go ahead.

Great, thank you very much. Two questions. One, just on the menu pricing, I think you said for the first quarter in its entirety, you were running in the mid 7% range. I believe you mentioned that was no resistance. I'm wondering if you could just walk us through maybe what was taken in the first quarter and maybe what your current outlook is for what you would take for the rest of the year or what the pricing would be if you didn't take anything for the rest of the year that does seem to be some concern that new pricing is going to be harder to pierce through with what seems like food at home now full and below food away from home after a nice 18 month period where restaurants had some perhaps protection. So just trying to get your sense on the pricing outlook and your competence in what you plan on taking as we look to the rest of the year. Thank you. And then I have one follow up.

Yes Jeff. We're looking at somewhere in that 7% to 8% for the rest of this year where we sit right now. We don't plan at this current time, any additional menu pricing with our June, I guess it'd be our June 29 menu. We'll determine after that there's usually an October menu. And probably in October and you will take pricing as we start to think about that pricing trying to cover inflationary costs going into 2024. At the same time, we continue to try and be I guess as I mentioned in the call, strategic in the way we're trying to look at our pricing items that are more unique and differentiated where consumers that are coming out and looking at things like a prime rib that maybe you can't make at home that provide much more of an experiential dining, we feel that there could be room for pricing on those areas. But at the same time, we want to continue to balance it with that barbell approach which is around the lunch specials, our daily brew house specials and so forth to make sure that again, there's kind of a good, better, best pricing. But where we sit right now kind of in the seven I think we're a little bit higher than that right now. That's kind of how we're going to roll through this year even as we some pricing will roll off in June probably bring us down into the kind of low seven is at that time or so.

And Jeff, one piece to add on this too, when we take our pricing, there's the post audit that we do looking through both the incidence rates, if we see any shifts down or looking at trading relationships and we've seen very consistent ordering before and after the pricing rounds. So as we made the comments in the prepared remarks that we haven't seen any impact on the price rounds, it had been accepted. That's really what's driving it. It's really no incident shift after pricing rounds, as well as no trade downs, no not trading from something that's higher cost in the lower cost, we're seeing very consistent ordering patterns before and after.

That's very encouraging. My other question was just on the dollars you're spending. I know, in 2023 seems to be focused more on the remodels with 30 or more units whereas the new units, Greg and I have been talking about quality over quantity, and it's very understandable with the seemingly five units this year presumably you'd like to do more, but you want to find quality. But the couple you already opened this year with 150,000, average weekly sales. And that's very impressive. I'm just wondering, what are the greatest issues you're finding in terms of finding sites more so than the five. I think investors would love to see a reacceleration in the unit growth, which you guys used to deliver. So I'm just wondering what maybe are the challenges you're finding to find more than five sites in a particular year, whether it's real estate, or the investment cost or anything along those lines will be helpful? Thank you.

Yes great question Jeff. It's actually your, what you ended there with. One is the site cost to build as much as we're at a one to one right now, with the new restaurants doing 150 times, obviously, 50 weeks gets you about $7.5 million. And we mentioned this on another call. Myself, our board of directors, our executive team, really don't want to be spending $7.5 million to build a restaurant. And we continue to look for ways to bring that down, but still maintain the elements of the brew house theater, which are so important to differentiate our concept. So Greg Lynds who is here is working with his team to work on ways to bring that down and work through a couple of different prototypes. So that's number one. Number two is as the people get better, but we want to make sure as we continue to build restaurants, we have the right quality of individuals to run these restaurants that are doing 7 million as we just talked about. And those are the two governors to growth. I don't think this puts any change in our view of where we can go. And ultimately, we want to get back to growing our new restaurants at a 5% plus clip, which will get you 10 plus new restaurants. We're continuing to line up the new restaurant growth for next year and what that pipeline is going to look like, I don't think we're going to get to the 5% next year meeting 10 plus. Some of its again building out the infrastructure and doing the right way for quality over quantity. But that is our target. And I fully believe we'll get back to that target here shortly.

Thank you.

You're welcome. Thank you.

The next question comes from David Tarantino with Baird. Please go ahead.

Hi, good afternoon. First question is just I was wondering if you could help to break down the composition of the comp a bit better for Q1? Can you talk I know you gave us a pricing that 7% but was there a mix impact or is traffic essentially the plug there?

Sure David. When we said that the lunch and late night increase that that did weigh on check a little bit. So think of traffic was low single digit positive, but then yes, then check was up in that 6% to 7% range.

Got it. And then what is your guidance for the second quarter assume on those metrics? It sounds like you might be running a bit higher pricing. So I wanted to understand kind of what the underlying traffic assumption is for the second quarter?

Yes. It's more in the kind of flattish to negative low single digits based on the where the average check is trending.

Okay, so maybe you could clarify what the pricing is. I thought you said it was little higher --

I think the way to think about it, David, if we talked about fact that we're going to try and grow average weekly sales in the 4% to 5% range and pricing being in that kind of upper single digits we've talked about trying to be somewhere 7- 8 the entire year. It starts to depending on where you look at it as how you piece it together, it looks like kind of low single digits, negative traffic. Generally, the difference there would be, we're not getting the full 7% or 8% on our menu pricing. It's down as Tom just mentioned, somewhere in 100 to 200 bips. So that's why the difference is going to be traffic of zero to negative 2-ish let's call it negative 3-ish.

Got it. Okay, and then is that I guess, is that how you're running right now? You mentioned some choppiness at the start of the quarter and optimism about what's to come. So it does. Is the message here that the traffic needs to improve? Or is the kind of how you're running right now? Or quarter to date?

Yes. It's been all over the place, I would say more recent trends, as we get away from Easter have been closer to the kind of mid single digit comps I would say.

Got it. Okay, great. And then the last question I had is just in general, I know, you've given us a lot of detail on the price increases, not affecting kind of mix impacts or what consumers are buying. But I'm wondering if you could maybe opine on whether you think there's any traffic degradation related to the price increases, either for you or the industry. I know, you're not alone in having to take pricing. But I wonder just as you lean in on pricing, to protect margins, are you seeing any sort of information or traffic data that would suggest there's a pullback?

It's interesting, David, because when we look at last year, I'm using last year, and kind of going into this year, there was really no change in our traffic as we took different pricing last year, last year, I think we ended up more in the mid sixes or seven for the full year. So don't necessarily think six and seven on top, because it's how it blends at different times. And we didn't really see much change in there. This year, it was harder to tell because of the January going over against Omicron. And then seeing how things have kind of like settled in right now. What I would tell you which kind of plays into our numbers overall, is we're continuing to see better growth in the dining room, which makes sense even here in into the April timeframe. And we're seeing more of this flattening out of the delivery and I said delivery and takeout meeting, total off premise. So that numbers kind of flattening, even though there's pricing there. And that becomes for lack of a better term, maybe a little bit negative on the traffic where you're seeing better in the dining room. And it's a little bit to be expected as our dining rooms get better and more efficient. That's where we're seeing consumers to go. I don't know how much of that though, is really pricing or when we've taken pricing, seeing a real change in our business.

Got it. Great, thank you.

I'll add on that as well. The one metric we also watch after the pricing rounds is just how we're trending versus black box. So we get weekly both sales and traffic data from black box. And through last year through this year, we've been beating the industry and that margin hasn't changed. And we track it right after we take pricing. And usually it's not that visit that'll impact it'll impact the next visit. So we watch it in the coming weeks and months. And it's been very consistent with our trends versus the industry and how much we're ahead. So it's at least it's not impacting us any more than the industry, it seems like it's, being accepted.

And my last comment on this one and I know this. So it becomes a little bit more challenging because it's a little bit more qualitative than quantitative. But it's the reason that on our drive and optimize conferences coming up, we are spending time on really making sure we're taking care of our guests within our restaurants. At the end of the day, we have to deliver that gold standard execution. We have to deliver gracious hospitality. So our guests know that if they are spending more, they are getting a better dining experience at BJ's and are willing to pay for it. And that's key for us going forward. It's one of the things that we will always invest back into our people and make sure that they're taking care of our guests every day.

That’s very helpful. Thank you.

You're welcome.

The next question comes from Nick Setyan with Wedbush Securities. Please go ahead.

Thank you. I do want to focus on margins a little bit more here. COD's in Q1, obviously, in the sort of 266 range we took a little bit more pricing here in early Q2. It sounds like inflation running a little bit better than what we thought even a couple of months ago. I mean, how are we thinking about the cadence COGs this year? And can we exit Q4 under 26%?

Sure, Nick. Yes. Very, very possible there. So going into the year, we did have some, some inflation. So we're not modeling in deflation right now. But the percentage of increases has been modestly under what we were expecting, even a short time ago. The back half of the year, it really depends on what happens with [indiscernible] that's a big input into our business. So if we have some inflation baked in there, and that was part of the full year forecast, but no, that's really the determinate if it's little higher, a little lower. But yes, we certainly expected to give some pricing and how that flows through it could certainly be in the 25.

Is there anything in terms of mix shifts or anything else that we should think about that might derail sort of the sequential downtick in COGs from Q1 to Q2 from Q3 to Q4?

Nick, I think as Tom said, it's really going to be around beef. One of the things that we've seen in our business, really coming out of COVID, I'd almost argue maybe a little bit into COVID is consumers like they're kind of indulgent comfort foods. And at times, they are things that are a little bit more unique than what they can make at their home easily. And we've seen over the years, especially coming out of COVID, just things like ribeye and our trade tip, really start to come up our chain of commodities, versus maybe people thinking of BJ's from 15, 20 years ago, where it was kind of a pizza and beer joint, that very menu has really moved that mix around a lot on us. And because we use a fresh product in regards to ribeye and prime rib, as well as our [indiscernible], it's not locked in for the full year. So we continue to watch that. We've got some initiatives against that in regards to how we can be more efficient and continue to manage that. But I think it's the real wildcard out there, as Tom said.

And I guess relative to sort of $25 million cost takeout number, where are we now relative to that 25 million?

We're probably in the middle innings of it. We put through some things like we've talked about before, such as the wings, a couple of ways that we've changed our cutting of our fresh salmon, that have come through on the commodities. Right now it's, I think we're a big efforts going after the operating occupancy line. That's an area that just has shifted on us as well as the rest of the casual dining industry. Some of it's the off premise. Some of it was those challenges with off premise in regards to takeout packages and other costs, that now we can competitively bid and get those in. As Tom mentioned, we've got takeout packaging coming in later this year. That'll give us some savings there. We're looking at also, less, I think, actually leftover packaging is coming in this year against some changes in takeout packaging, that's actually higher quality to go after. We've got to offset that with some changes in janitorial. We're starting to see a good momentum on there in regards to labor. And then we'll see another round here as we go through it with the new menu coming in June or basically July, but less menu items that allows us to readjust our staffing, labor lines as well as adjusting our prep as well as other efficiencies in there. So there's really another level that's going to start to come here in Q3. Unfortunately Q3 is a little bit lower weekly sales average. So some of it'll get masked by that I think going into Q4 you will start to see that real benefit coming from the efficiencies driven from the lower, from the little bit smaller menu and then on top of that, the other efficiencies around the cost savings.

Great. Thank you very much.

You're welcome.

The next question is from Andrew Wolf with C. L. King. Please go ahead.

Good morning. I wanted to focus on labor with regards to wage rate inflation. I think you said what's about running. I think last quarter, you said it was 7%. And have you seen any changes in that rate is or is it kind of too soon and the economic slowdown for there to be relief on the labor side?

Hi, Andrew. Sure the year-over-year number did decelerate a little bit more. It's more in the mid 5% range now for Q1. If you look sequentially, more of the quarter-over-quarter, it was more in the mid 1% range. So it continues to it's still inflation, it's still we're paying more per hour. But it's nothing like the increases we were seeing a year or two ago.

Andrew, I think the other comment on that as well as Q1 is generally going to be similar a highest inflation periods because the minimum wage increases to start to hit in January 1. So to Tom's point, we're not necessarily seeing what we've seen a year ago. And we'll see how that continues to the year. The other side and Tom mentioned this in his formal remarks, is our retention levels are the best, they benefited a couple of years. And that really helps us they're not as good as they were back in 2019. And that's where we need to get back to, that's really important for us to make sure that we're bringing on the right people at BJ's. We are onboarding them correctly. And basically reducing turnover that drives efficiencies within our restaurant and helps manage the overtime, helps manage the training costs. And ultimately, that is a buttress against inflation, and that's a big initiative of ours.

Okay, excellent color. I was actually going to ask about the metrics. Getting back to I think the last question of follow on the $25 million class savings goal. Now, it looks like the run rate and COGS is around $8 million just based on the color you gave in your earlier. So is it fair to think that and based on the commentary you just gave as well, that more of that is going to be skewed to labor and packaging and some of the other costs in the P&L to get from whatever you're running at now back to the full realized amount.

We'll be looking still across the board. If I think of everything that's being vetted right now, there's still plenty in the food cost line as well. So it really still is a full court press against if you want to put it into three buckets, the labor, the food cost, and the O&O the operating expenses. So it's great that we found is some of these great wins on the food cost side, but there's other items being tested right now that still have some decent impact. So, but there's certainly, I mean, we did highlight a number of things that will be helping on the labor front as well. So yes, wouldn't be no, I wouldn't say it's more skewed in one way area versus another.

Andrew the best thing that's happening, I don't know if it's the best thing, but I think that's happening really well is we are getting back to what I would call kind of just normal operating cadence. And what that means as well. And I think it's a little bit to Tom's point on the commodity side, we have the luxury now or the ability now to go out and bid certain products that you just couldn't do last year. Some of it worked out better for us. So for examples, we talked about it wings, we couldn't go out and bid our wings last year. So we had to figure out something better. And that really helped us. But now that we can bid certain things, maybe we don't need to look at it differently, we could just get better pricing that we couldn't get a year ago, as suppliers are coming back online. So I think to the point is we look for our 259 and the reason we're pretty bullish, and we'll get above that is there's areas that we couldn't go after last year. Some of them by the way, are takeout packaging that we talked about, or to go packaging, but you're also seeing it on the commodities line and everything which I think will continue to help benefit us as well as the rest of the industry.

Okay, thanks for that color. I will leave it there.

Thank you.

The next question is from Joshua Long with Stevens Inc. Please go ahead.

Great, thank you for taking my question. Want to see if we can circle back to the commodity conversation and how much of your basket is locked right now? I appreciate the comments around beef, and how that can kind of shape up or drive the trend for what happens in the second half of the year. But what kind of visibility do you have on the remainder of your basket here over the next quarter or two?

Sure, Josh. About a third is locked in annual contracts right now. So it's a little less than we would have been kind of in the pre-COVID way that we would approach across the board here but there's areas of our business like wings, for example, where it was a kind of a process product before and we would lock it in for the year. We could have locked wing prices in for the raw product for the whole year. But it was very favorable to not do that to to float to market. There's other areas of our business that just strategically or we think of the premium that was being charged a lot. It just made more sense. And the direction of where the commodity markets were headed. It just made more sense to float. So a little bit less than usual, but not by any wide margin.

Great, that's helpful. And then on your comments around ticking marketing backup, especially as we go through the back half of the year. Can you talk about what channels have been working particularly well for you, and just how you're thinking about that messaging as we get into a more normalized environment? I mean, there's obviously conversations around, potentially a softening macro, and just remind us, is it going to be awareness brand building? Is it going to be a little bit of more targeted price points, but what's working in the current environment from a messaging and awareness perspective for the BJ's brand?

Yes. Great question, Josh. Right now, it's a little bit more brand building. The reason it's a little bit higher, this quarter, has really more to do with the fact that we did new creative. And so we've got to expense that creative, it's going to get expensive in Q2. To some degree, the amount of a see what are you going to call media spend, or being on TV or doing digital TV, linear versus connected, etc, is somewhat similar with last year. But it's really the more creative that's coming through from the expense side of things. As we look at our business, we want to build the brand. Even though with our brand building, we do have usually some tagline. It might not necessarily be price specific, but it might be more limited time offering. So like right now, our tagline is around our confetti pizookie. Our pizookie key is one of those drivers for us that is unique and differentiated. And we'll continue to use that both from a connected and linear TV as well as social and digital.

Great, thank you.

You're welcome.

The next question is from Sharon Zackfia with William Blair. Please go ahead.

Hi, good afternoon. I was hoping to talk some more about the menu rationalization. Can you talk about whether I believe it's been in test whether you've seen any kind of lost sales or consumer pushback and kind of the order of magnitude of margin benefit that provides? And then second question, just the loss on disposal of assets running a couple of million dollars a quarter, the last few quarters. Is that related to the remodels? And is that something which you kind of expect for the foreseeable future?

Tom want to handle that?

Let me, I'll handle the second question first. So this quarter, the majority of that expense was related to these glass dividers that we put up in our restaurants during the COVID era. Just it was a high quality glass that we put up as dividers to really give folks the ability to come to the restaurants where we can expand capacity at the time. But with where we are today and it does break down the sight lines to our TVs and so we're going through and removing those dividers. So there's some write down associated with those. But yes, otherwise, for the remodels we did right off we did have a plan coming into the year. So you saw an increased amount. That was of the expense in Q4. So the majority of the remodels should have been captured in that in the Q4 window.

Hey Sharon --

Menu rationalization. Yes, thanks.

Yes. First of all, great question on the menu rationalization because it is something we've been testing for a while. And you're right in the sense that it's very difficult to rationalize the menu and grow sales. It takes a little bit of time. And it's probably one of the reasons we've been testing this for a while and have gone through different iterations to get it to where we believe we've got it right. And I will tell you as we work through this and I'm going to get you in a little bit of a sausage making, I guess, for lack of a better term. Certain things didn't work for us in this we took off some certain appetizers, and we saw our what I would call our add on sales go down so we've had to add those back and continue to work through some of that where we feel that the changes should be more or less net neutral within our business. And it is -- we try to look at reach and frequency. There are a couple of just interesting ones. We took off. This one was our internal debate. You're going to laugh. We took off the side wedge salad. And guess what people want a wedge salad will not switch to a House Salad or to a Side Caesar salad. So all of a sudden, we lost side salads. And we went ahead as we go through and do this testing, and therefore when it rolls out in the July timeframe. It'll still have a side wedge salad. So bottom line is we've gone through and we've worked with a lot and tried to make sure that we know it the best we can. That being said, every restaurant is a little bit different. But we feel comfortable in the fact that we've taken the right amount of testing that we've for lack of a better term measure twice. And we'll be cutting once in regards to this menu. And hopefully there's another round that we can take off some other items as we continue to create new, more craveable items for BJ's.

And, Greg, I know you mentioned you're taking off 10% of the menu items. I mean, what percent of ingredients are things that come in the back door are going away?

I want to say it's like 21 SKUs. I don't have sorry, I think I mentioned on one of the other calls, it's a decent amount in SKUs. It's decent amount of changes the way we're doing some prep to your point there. Some of the single source items that weren't high sellers that was come through that'll have adjust our prep hours on that going forward. But it is, there are more SKUs that are disappearing than there are menu items, I believe.

Okay, thank you.

You're welcome.

The next question is from Todd Brooks with Benchmark Company. Please go ahead.

Hey, thanks for taking the questions here. Just wondering if we could and I don't know which way is easier to snapshot the difference of where you are from a staffing standpoint year-over-year going into your seasonally strongest quarter, Greg. But can we either dimensionalize, maybe what we think we lost in Q2 last year from having I think 25% of the workforce at that point have been hired in the last three months. And we were coming off of limited menus and getting back to full menus and some restricted hours. Do you have a sense of maybe what it costs you last year or if you want to talk about from the prospect of standpoint, how excited are you to be going into this seasonally strong period with staffing where you want it retention improving, so you're getting bodies that have stayed in the role longer and gotten more efficient.

Yes. I think it's easier to talk prospectively. And we are as an organization excited I think going into this year's graduation, Mother's Day and Father's Day seasons, not only fully staff from a body standpoint, but it's really about the staff getting their sea legs under them. And getting used to doing the volumes we've done at BJ's. I think we learned a lot. Obviously last year, we learned a lot believe it or not, it's going to sound again, a little different in that is even like around Veterans Day weekend, some of the Veterans Day specials, there's a lot of volume that comes into our restaurants and our team members did a great job handling it. So we're excited to be fully staffed so that we can give better execution to our guests. They have even a better dining experience of BJ's and I think overall, it's to be a strong period for us. At the same time, though, as we did talk, I guess I'm tempered a little bit with there was a lot of buildup of people wanting to come out last year. And it's one of the reasons I think we see it in maybe alcohol incidents kind of slowing down a little bit. So I temper it a little bit with that. But I think we're excited to be fully staffed. We're excited the executing at the level that we're executing at and therefore we're excited to be able to take care of even more guests that want to come to BJ's.

If you look at something like Valentine's Day in the in Q1 do you see evidence that the demand was tempered on that occasion because that probably be the most recent [indiscernible].

We had a really good Valentine's Day. It was executed well by our team. They did a tremendous Valentine's Day and they did a great overall Valentine's Day weekend. So you can feel it in our restaurants. I get my hat's off to Chris Penn Zach and our Vice President operations team that are really doing a great job of making sure our teams are delivering on the gold standard and gracious hospitality. You just see it today versus a year ago. We see our restaurant managers out on the floor. We see our team members taking care of our guests. And I hadn't really thought about Valentine's Day I guess maybe because we're so much in April. But I think your point is a good one in the sense that we really had a strong Valentine's Day and we executed well against it in regards to our operations cadence.

Okay, great. And then just two quick ones for wrap up. One when you were talking about capital allocation, the one piece that you didn't mention was share repurchase. Obviously, the stock and the group have been weak here based on kind of the reality of the results that you put up. I think you can almost argue that the highest and best use of some capital may be share repurchase at these levels. Where does that fit into the overall plan given the other claims on CapEx that you have?

I think as we continue to grow our business, share repurchase and other capital allocations to benefit shareholders is an important part of the BJ's story. I think even if we were saying we were growing our business at five plus percent in regards to new restaurants, we would have extra cash in our business, assuming we move our margins the right way, which we fully expect to be able to use that cash to buy back shares. And as we continue to look and execute against our plan, I think share repurchases will be part of our business going forward.

Okay, and then a final one, you guys talked on the last call about an AI scheduling tool. I think it was being tested in 20 restaurants. Is there any update you can give us on maybe labor efficiencies that the tool is providing kind of in that control group of restaurants? And is it something where you want to proceed through the rest of the chain? And maybe what the cost save opportunity might be? Thanks.

Sure. The -- we're still very encouraged by what we're seeing. We're testing so on those 20 restaurants and I would say on average weeks there it's a good tool to get the sales forecast, right, so we can schedule more accurately as well as prep more accurately. Some of these weeks if you go into like the Easter's and it still needs some training there. But we're encouraged. We're still testing. But yes this is something that I think is something we're certainly excited about and thinking about how it could benefit us.

Okay, great. Thanks to you both.

Thank you.

Today's last question comes from Jon Tower with Citi. Please go ahead.

Great, hey most of my questions have been answered. So I guess two quick ones. Any impact of weather in the quarter or quarter-to-date you want to call out because I know California obviously had some fairly big swings, rest of the country got some benefits to start the first quarter. But anything noteworthy call out?

Hey Jon. We did see some impact in California, especially earlier in the quarter, especially when you think of the rain that came through. So it was a headwind, certainly in for some of those days and weeks. But like I said, California was our best performing market. So nothing that held us back. But it was a modest headwind.

Okay. And then just real quick flip into the menu reduction that you're talking about. It sounds like there's going to be some labor savings and prep improvement. You didn't mention anything about table turns in, I'm assuming that's part of the equation here, but just want to verify that that's the case. It's part of the work years getting faster table turns?

Jon, it should be a byproduct if we're able to be more effective in our kitchen and get menu items out sooner and quicker to our guests, then essentially, our tables would turn faster. But we have other opportunities there. We have mobile pay in our restaurants. In fact, people that use mobile pay end up with I want to say about a seven minute to 10 minutes quicker table turns and people that traditionally pay the way they currently are. So we're continuing to work through some of those other aspects to be faster. We're making some changes to our server handheld tablets, where they can actually take the payment there to speed up the process. The interesting thing about this and I'm going to go a little bit longer is we did a lot of testing with our innovation team in regards to how we can be faster in our restaurants. We've even set up in a test in a couple in a restaurant to kind of do a quick service for our guests where they can order right when they walk in and then get seated. And guests come to BJ's as I said for that kind of experiential dining experience. And even the ones that kind of ordered at the counter during our test, they end up ordering another beer. They ended up ordering [indiscernible] dessert at the end. And they still spent basically about an hour at BJ's. So we know the reason that a consumer comes a BJ's they made their decision based at their house not necessarily driving down the street going is it QSR or is it BJ's. Now that being said we want to be as efficient as we can with our table turns, and give the guests that wants to be faster the ability to be faster. So we'll continue to work that but at the same time, we understand that we are there for an experiential dining for our guests, and therefore, we want to make sure that we're doing everything we can make sure that they have a great experience.

Got it. Thanks for the -- for taking the questions. Have a good day.

My pleasure.

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes our question and answer session and the call has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.

Thank you, everyone.

Thanks.