Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Benchmark Electronics Second Quarter 2014 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to turn the conference call over to your host, Lisa Weeks. Please go ahead.

Good morning, everyone. I'd like to welcome you to the Benchmark Electronics earnings call for the second quarter of 2014. I'm Lisa Weeks, VP of Strategy and Investor Relations. Thank you for joining us today. Earlier today, we issued a press release highlighting our financial performance for the second quarter of 2014. If you did not receive a copy, you may obtain it from the Investor Relations section of our website at www.bench.com. This call is being webcast live, and a replay will be available on our website following the call. Gayla Delly, our President and CEO; and Don Adam, our CFO, are with me this morning. After their prepared remarks, we will open the call for your questions. For your information, Gayla and Don will be using a slide presentation also available on our website. The company has provided a reconciliation of our GAAP to non-GAAP measures in today's press release, as well as in the appendix of the presentation slides. During our call, we will be discussing forward-looking information. As a reminder, any of today's remarks that are not statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements and involve certain risks and uncertainties which are disclosed in the Safe Harbor section of our earnings release and SEC filings. Actual results may differ materially from these statements, and Benchmark undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements. Please turn to Slide 3, and I will turn the call over to Don Adam, Benchmark's CFO.

Thank you, Lisa, and good morning to everyone. We appreciate you joining us for today's call. Second quarter revenue and revenue and earnings exceeded our expectations, and we are very pleased with the efforts of our team. We generated revenues of $717 million, which was above our guidance of $665 million to $700 million. The upside was primarily associated with exceptionally strong demand in the telecommunications sector, driven by robust market acceptance of our customers new products coupled with successful new program ramps. Quarterly revenues increased $78 million or 12% from the first quarter of 2014 and increased $109 million or 18% from the same quarter last year. Our non-GAAP income was $23 million for the quarter compared to $17 million last year. Net income was $22 million for the quarter compared to $8 million last year. Our non-GAAP earnings per share were $0.43 versus $0.31 in the second quarter of last year, a 39% increase. Our GAAP earnings per share were 41% -- $0.41 in the quarter compared to $0.16 in the same quarter last year. Our non-GAAP operating margin was 4.1% compared to 3.5% during the second quarter of last year and up sequentially from 3.6% in the first quarter. The increase in operating margin reflects the leverage in our model, driven by increased demand levels, solid productivity improvements and effective cost controls. During the second quarter of 2014, we incurred approximately $1.9 million of integration-related costs as we continue to integrate the sites we acquired in 2013. The second quarter non-GAAP effective income tax rate was 20.3%. Our expected tax rate for the third quarter is expected to range between 20% and 21%. Diluted -- the diluted weighted average shares outstanding for the second quarter were 54.4 million. Please turn to Slide 4 to review our revenue…

Thank you, Don, and good morning, everyone. In addition to our solid operational performance, I am pleased to share with you another excellent quarter of bookings. We continue to see a healthy funnel of new business opportunities for design and manufacturing solutions in both our traditional and nontraditional markets. During the second quarter of 2014, we recorded bookings of 39 new programs, and this included 8 engineering projects. These programs have an estimated annual revenue run rate between $120 million and $150 million. Now turn with me to Slide 9 so we can discuss our perspective on the markets we serve. Beginning with computing, we expect to see a mid single-digit decrease for the next quarter after a better-than-expected Q2. Our third quarter forecast reflects normal seasonality in computing, and as Don stated earlier, we currently expect our computing revenue to remain around the 20% level of our revenue for 2014. In industrial control, we see a mid to high single-digit growth rate for the upcoming quarter. This growth is being fueled by new programs in industrial automation and control, which supports the transportation, refining and building industry, and these are continuing to ramp new programs into Q3. In medical, we expect Q3 revenues to remain flat with stable demand. The manufacturing demand for OEM medical companies with Class II and Class III registered products remains high, and we continue to have a differentiated service offering in this area. Consistent with our comments earlier this year, we anticipate our medical programs, which are new, to begin ramping following the expected regulatory approvals in early 2015. In the third quarter, we expect a decline of approximately 30% or $20 million for -- from Q2 levels for the test and instrumentation segment. This decline is the result of some softness in demand…

[Operator Instructions] We'll first go to the line of Sean Hannan with Needham. Sean K.F. Hannan - Needham & Company, LLC, Research Division: First question I have here is really in terms of the win environment. So wanted to see if we can get some color from you folks, number one, on the level that was accomplished in the quarter. It's a little bit -- the range is a little bit lower than what we've seen in some recent quarters. It doesn't look like it's really concerning, but just want to see if we can get some detail around what comprise those numbers, and then also how you characterize the environment today and so forth.

I think, Sean, generally, we are pleased with the level of bookings, especially in the context of the ongoing activities. So sometimes it relates to timing when we actually are able to close on the bookings. But really overall with the pipeline of opportunities, we're very pleased. And then as we noted in our comments in our performance, one of the things that we are intensely focused on is the conversion, right, to ensure that our bookings, as we are reporting them, and the conversion of revenue that we are seeing that come into focus in a more rapid time frame. So if the programs look to be longer out and it exceeds a 2-year ramp, we are making sure that we look at those programs as the opportunities come in to focus rather than anticipating what customers believe a run rate in 3 years might be, for instance. So I think we've really tightened up what we identify as a program ramp in discussion with our customers, not anticipating the growth that we don't have evidence of in any reasonable time frame. Sean K.F. Hannan - Needham & Company, LLC, Research Division: Okay. That's helpful. Now -- and just to follow on that, it looks like still at least for your trailing 12 months for the wins that you have here, you're still certainly above $600 million. That's kind of in the low 20-ish percent range versus your trailing revenues. It sounds like that your expectation was we would still have a pretty good conversion rate, as well as maybe there's some acceleration in being able to realize and bring some of that into rev generation into market. Is that the way I should interpret some of that?

Yes, that's what we're looking to do is to ramp the new programs and get them into the revenue stream more efficiently and effectively. Sean K.F. Hannan - Needham & Company, LLC, Research Division: Okay. That's helpful. And then next question here. I just wanted to see if I can get some clarification. I thought I heard from Don as part of the guidance, it doesn't sound like you've pulled in any business from the third quarter into the second quarter results. Is that accurate?

Yes.

So based on what we saw from customers before they had the increase in demand as an outlook for Q3 and then what we saw kind of after that increase, it did not appear that they -- there was any pull forward of opportunities, but rather it was this market reaction to the new programs and new products that were introduced. Sean K.F. Hannan - Needham & Company, LLC, Research Division: Okay. So naturally, it just ended up being a very strong quarter?

Right.

We'll next go to the line of Brian Alexander with Raymond James. Brian G. Alexander - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division: Okay. Maybe just to dive a little bit more into the communications business. It sounds like most of this is new programs versus demand. I just wanted to clarify that because it's obviously a very, very strong result, much stronger than what we're seeing in terms of overall spending out there in the communications market. There's some concern that carrier CapEx could be front-end loaded this year. So how should we think about this segment going forward, and how confident are you that there isn't a bigger decline coming beyond the low single digits that you guided for Q3?

I think, Brian, as you've seen, we have grown probably for the last 2 years in this area probably more significantly than the marketplace and maybe others specifically in our industry, and part of it is the cellular infrastructure that I believe that's been built out and the demand for data transmission, if you will. Again, we look to our customers for their forecast and do not see that -- or expect that it would be a more significant falloff. But we have seen growth primarily from new programs and addition of new customers. So I don't have any greater granularity into the specifics. If you recall, it's been, I want to say, more than 2 years ago that the expectation for some of the build-out was pretty significant, and that was delayed. But we don't see any dynamics at this point that would cause the change to be radical. Clearly, there will be fluctuations as new programs ramp and are introduced, that they will have more significant growth upfront than they do in the latter portion of its life cycle, but I don't see anything beyond that. Brian G. Alexander - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division: Okay. And then maybe just one for Don. On the share buyback, I think you said you have about $35 million left, and that you would look to deploy this over the next 2 to 3 quarters. It seems a little bit more aggressive than maybe what you've spent the last couple of quarters, which is good to see. So is that a function of your confidence in the business trajectory or perhaps U.S. cash flow generation? Just curious what's causing you to step that up, which of course is a good thing.

Well, a couple of things. I think, first, cash flow generation in the U.S., we had a pretty notable increase in cash in the U.S. over the last 6 months and I think just coming off the heels of integrating the sites and rationalizing the new acquisitions that we had last year. Again, just the cash in the U.S. is up and just get that done -- completed sooner.

We'll go now to the line of Sherri Scribner with Deutsche Bank.

I wanted to ask about the industrial segment. You guys have seen strength there as well as in the telecom segment. Is that primarily based on new program ramps? And along with that question, can you give us some sense of what you're hearing with customers in terms of their view of end demand? Are things improving or not -- still not a lot of visibility?

Yes, in terms of the growth that we're seeing, pretty good quarter in industrial controls. It's a little bit less than we expected really because of the timing of new ramps. But you're correct in terms of the growth that we're seeing is from new programs that we are ramping. In terms of demand, I think stable, and any growth that we're going to see there is going to be driven by new programs. And I think that's evidenced as we'll see some increase -- we're expecting to see an increase in Q3 from our Q2 levels.

So I guess, Sherri, to add to that, I don't believe customers are seeing significant improvement in the demand environment per se, but they are seeing that the solutions that they're bringing to market are being well accepted in the marketplace as well. In industrial, we serve a pretty broad market as we indicated in our notes. So pretty broad range of solutions being brought to market, but we do not see what I'll call units of production increases on some of the traditional products that we may have served, bringing as much to the revenue increase as we see the new programs. So once again, new programs are carrying the day in almost every industry.

And we have a question in queue from the line of Jim Suva with Citi.

Kind of bigger, long-term strategic question. When I look at your wins, they're kind of going on around say 23-ish percent of your trailing 4 quarter revenues, which is very, very healthy. I know there's things accompanying and come out all the time. Is there a rule of thumb of at that rate organically what you should see the company growing? And the reason I ask is I'm just trying to then bridge about you just posted 18% year-over-year growth, which is great. But I think if you back out CTS, and I'm just estimating about $50 million, then the rate would be closer to 9% to 10% organic growth rate year-over-year. So I'm just trying to extrapolate, is that what we should expect, kind of 9% to 10% organic growth for the company on a win rate that's going at kind of 20-ish 3%? Or am I missing some variables, which is likely the case?

Well, there's always a number of variables, as you indicate, that are included in the overall numbers. But I would say that at a 9% to 10% organic growth rate against the backdrop of the marketplace today, we feel that, that is a very strong number. And so feel pleased with the bookings rate we have when it converts to that rate. I think as we look forward and as we continue to grow, clearly, we will push for bookings to be even stronger. And I don't always believe that you will end up with a formulaic ability to review the bookings. But for us, as we've indicated before, somewhere in that $120 million to $150 million range would be what I would expect, and clearly are going to drive to have that number go higher as we continue to grow. But when it converts to 9% to 10%, I'm very happy with that.

Great. And then as a follow-up, I believe, and maybe I'm wrong, is the restructuring kind of related to the CTS integration? And if so, can you walk us through about how far along that integration we are and how much longer we have to do and kind of the expected future charges and benefits?

Well, in terms of the integration, we should -- we probably have another quarter to go in terms of the nature of the consolidation, back-office, those types of, I'd say, customary integration efforts. But I think -- yes, as we've said in the past as well as we stand now, we should largely be complete with those by the end of the third quarter.

We will go next to the line of Amit Daryanani with RBC Capital Markets.

A couple of questions. I guess, one, maybe just trying to understand the September quarter guide a little bit. You said there were no pull-ins, and I think, Gayla, you talked about you have a lot of ramps ahead of you in the back half of the year. So why don't you think things could be better than seasonal, I guess, in September given the trends you're seeing, given the ramps that you have? What are the offsets to that, that you see in September?

Well, as we noted in our comments and in history, computing is traditionally weak in the third quarter or weaker than the second quarter. And also, European demand is typically significantly down in the third quarter. I don't see that the ramps changed those dynamics. So while some of the ramps are coming into the fold -- and just in general, I would say it is a lackluster quarter. There don't seem to be as many, I would call it, shows or activities where the attention-getting is there for some of the new program and new product introduction. So I think it's, I'll call it, the prepositioning quarter when launches are done to really get out there in the fourth quarter, remembering that we're not supporting consumers. So that really is probably the biggest difference when you compare to some other markets.

Got it. And then I guess, Gayla, you talked about being very happy with the high single-digit organic growth, to Jim's question earlier. Is that something you can sustain throughout the year? Or is that more of an aspirational statement that you made? And the reason I ask is, is if you can sustain it through the year, it would imply your December quarter should be closer to $800 million versus what the Street is modeling right now.

No, I think the key there -- and that's a good point, Amit, so thank you for bringing that up for clarification. The key there, as you note, with telecom being down to 20%, we are expecting for the year for telecom to be around that range. So as we come off from the prior year where compute was very strong -- did I say...

Telco.

Okay. I said telco. I'm being corrected, thank you. As compute comes down to a 20% range, we did have some program last year, which we noted in last year's call notes that were not ongoing programs, and so they added to last year's revenue. That's probably the primary headwind. But if you take out and look at compute versus the overall, you'll see that we are seeing the nontraditional markets grow significantly, and also the telecom growth offsetting that. That is probably the biggest change that causes it to not achieve the numbers of $800 million that you set forth. And so clearly, we don't see that that's rocketing up in the fourth quarter like we've seen some of the fourth quarter performance in prior years where you had a significant launch or a new program specifically in compute.

Got it. That's helpful. And then just finally, is there a way to think about what was the CTS-centric inefficiencies on your operating margin line in the quarter?

No, I don't really segregate that. It's all part of Benchmark operational excellence plans right now. So there's no forgiveness for not performing. The key is there that we are looking forward to getting the back-office activities integrated so it is more efficient. But I don't have a specific calculation of the segregated impact.

We'll go next to the line of Wamsi Mohan with Bank of America.

In telecom, you noted 5 or 6 customers exceeded plan. If you look on a dollar basis, was the strength also pretty broad-based, or was it more concentrated? And dollar-wise, could you just comment on sort of maybe rank order between cellular infrastructure, optical or anything else that drove that strength in the quarter?

No. In fact, Wamsi, I don't have a breakdown, and I don't look at our businesses. That's not our primary focus is on. The -- and I mean, clearly the cellular infrastructure, whether it's backhaul system, trunking, ODUs, network monitoring and control, there is a variety of markets that the products serve. And so I think that we saw, again, good growth and apparently good spend, new programs being well accepted and new product acceptance of our customers' products. So 5 out of 6, it's pretty notable to see that we had that much broad-based activity in telco.

Okay. And then on test and instrumentation, in your guidance, a quarter-on-quarter decline. I know you shared some color before, but -- and I understand demand can be lumpy. But is this largely driven by semi-cap? And is this a technology transition that's impacting multiple customers? And when do you think that, that starts to sort of pick back up again?

I think it this technology based. And overall, when do I expect it to pick up? I probably don't have the real estimate of when that takes place, but I would expect it to be early 2015. But clearly, I don't think our customers are providing reads out that far in that industry.

And we have a question in queue from the line of -- a follow-up question from the line of Sean Hannan. Sean K.F. Hannan - Needham & Company, LLC, Research Division: Just wanted to ask in terms of some of your regional facilities. Thailand, we haven't talked about that much, and just wanted to get a sanity check in terms of how your facilities are perhaps changing or modifying or implementing any types of business contingency plans based on the geopolitical activity there and any thoughts you could provide around that would be helpful.

Thank you, Sean. I would say that as you know, for Benchmark, we had the challenge and the opportunity to really put into action our contingency plan through prior experiences. So I believe we are well positioned to manage the challenges that may come about. And there is a lot of geopolitical instability around the world today. So we look to control that which we can control and manage what we can manage and try to stay alert and informed. But beyond that, the key for us is to ensure that our contingency plans are strong and in place, and I think we've demonstrated that in prior periods that we have those and they are very supportive of what we need to accomplish when challenges arise. Sean K.F. Hannan - Needham & Company, LLC, Research Division: Is there anything even anecdotal that you've seen as, or that's been reported to you, as disruption as a result of some of what's occurring over there? Or has it just entirely remained a nonissue?

If you're specifically referring to any impacts to Benchmark and/or to the Thailand unrest, no, nothing there. And as you also know, we don't have anything in the Middle East. So if you're talking specifically about Thailand, no, and then we don't have anything in the Middle East related to any more current activities that are being broadcasted in the news today.

[Operator Instructions] And speakers, we have no one else queuing up for questions at this time.

I want to thank everyone for joining us for the call today. And if there's any follow-up questions, we'll be in the office for follow-up calls. Thank you very much, and have a great day.

Ladies and gentlemen, that will conclude your conference call for today. Thank you for your participation and for using AT&T's Executive TeleConference Service. You may now disconnect.