Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. Welcome to Bel Fuse Fourth Quarter and Results conference call. During the presentation, all participants will be in a listen-only mode. Afterwards we will conduct a question-and-answer session. (Operator Instructions) As a reminder, the conference is being recorded today, Thursday, February 14, 2008. I would now like to turn the conference over to Dan Bernstein, President. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, John. And we like to welcome you to our conference call to review Bel's fourth quarter and 2007 results. Before we start, I would like to hand it over to Colin Dunn, our Vice President of Finance. Colin?

Good morning everybody and thanks Dan. I will start with the Safe Harbor statement. Except for historical information contained in today's news release and this conference call, the matters discussed including statements regarding certain challenge faced by the company and the evaluation of acquisition possibilities are forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements are the market concerns facing our customers, the continuing viability of sectors that rely on our products, the effect of business and economic conditions, capacity to supply constraints over difficulties, product development, commercializing or technological difficulties, the regulatory and trade environments, uncertainties associated with legal proceedings, the market's acceptance of the company's new products and the competitive responses to those new products, and the risk factors detailed from time to time in the company's SEC reports. In light of the risks and uncertainties, there can be no assurance that any forward-looking statements will in fact proved to be correct. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements. Having said that, I will now move on. First talk about sales. For the fourth quarter of 2007 our sales were $69.3 million, which was $8.8 million higher than the $60.6 million in the fourth quarter of 2006. This $69.3 million was $3 million higher than the $66.4 million for the receding quarter ended September 2007. Sales year-over-year were higher than modules product group that includes DC to DC converters and testing modules. The fourth quarter of 2007 was Bel's second highest ever sales quarter. Profits in cost of sales -- Bel under the quarter on a GAAP basis with net after tax earnings of $10,255,000. This compares to the net earnings of $4,697,000 for the fourth quarter of 2006. Labor costs continue…

Thank you, Colin. As Colin mentioned we are pleased with both our sales for the quarter, our second highest quarter average sales and our strong operating result. Backlog remained strong but as with any new year period, it's always difficult to truly feel comfortable with the backlog. At this time we see no softness from any of our major customers including Cisco. As part of our strategy to consolidate manufacturing to large more efficient facilities, the fourth quarter we ceased manufacturing at a small plant in China and also sold of our property in Macau. Both production was moved to our main facility in China. The net result will be a consolidation of our four facilities in to two. However, at this time, we do remain very active looking at acquisition opportunities that hopefully can stimulate growth and profitability to the company. At this time Don, I would like to open up the call for questions please. Operator?

Yes.

We'd like to open up the call for questions please.

Perfect. (Operator Instructions). And our first question comes from the line of Todd Cooper with Stephens. Please proceed with your question.

Yes, good morning.

Good morning.

Hi, Todd.

How much per quarter will the cost saving initiatives cost over the course of the year?

It is not a specific number, Todd. You know part of the issue is, we were looking at, here we have other cost going up all the time, and so we didn’t split these assets as a discrete item. But you know, if you think of closing a 46,000 square foot facility which is what the facility was in Macau and a 53,000 square foot facility which was the size of the facility in China, you get a bit of a flavor for what the savings will be even just on the utility side.

Okay. I was asking more about the cost of closing those facilities. I think last quarter you said it was approximately $0.5 million. Will it be more in the second half of the year than the first half of the year?

I think that's a good number.

Yeah, actually it was just a little less; we came at about 485 I think Todd. I spoke, this morning I said 500,000 just rounding it up but we came in just slightly under that.

I think going forward that's a number we can use for the next 12 months.

Yeah, that's not going to change.

Okay. Can you describe your employee situation around that Chinese New Year in China?

What generally happens is that as you get closer to Chinese New Year, most of our workers are coming from the north, and some of them do migrate before Chinese New Year, and you saw it losing the workforce. And the problem is it's very difficult to bring workers into your facilities in the September, October, November timeframe to train them and so forth. So what happened was we had a layoff in July and August, and then our backlog started to increase and at that time we went out to look for more labor and it was very difficult to attract the labor. So our backlog was getting pushed out and our lead times were getting pushed out. As that was occurring, we received more orders coming in and that's where we have pretty strong backlog today.

Okay.

And once again it's too early - generally, the retention we have coming back from Chinese New Year could go anywhere from 70% to 90%, and historically over the past five years we haven’t been able to come up with an exact figure of where it could lie just in that range, and we won't know the true details of the retention into another week, we have set in many different types of bonuses and recruiting systems to hopefully get that retention rate up to the 85%, 90%

Can you give us an idea of kind of what the average headcount has been running versus at the LA what it would be for you?

I think we're looking to be at, I think we're at about 7000 people and we're looking at 9000, 9500. Our goal is to get our lead time down to six or eight weeks if we can.

I am sorry, go ahead.

Once again, our major product is the MagJack and it’s a very labor intensive product and I would tell you 75% of our labor is going into that product. Labor doesn’t really affect the other major product groups.

You were seeing more competition in that product, because of the labor shortage. Do you feel like you are losing any business or [anything] this year?

I think we don’t -- our biggest problems would be in single source at many customers because we are the market leader and its now taking our competitors amount of time to come into become second and third source. So, I don’t think our problem has been leveraged more being a single source and there is no customer we have in any product we sell that wants to be single source.

Okay. Is the lion share of your power supply manufacturing being done in China today?

Yes, all I would say 80% of it's done is in China. And once again, we're using a far less amount of people running that operation because it's mainly running at SMP [ph] facility.

Okay.

Because we're not using that much labor, we protect that product, we protect the Fuse product group and basically what we do hire back labor because they don’t need that many, they get first shot.

All right. And can you characterize what the demand picture for your products look like prior to the Chinese New Year?

No, to be honest over the past eight weeks before Chinese New Year, we've seen strong demand in all of our products, and extreme amount of expediting.

Okay.

So once again, that really make - we see such a, we haven't seen this type of expediting for maybe two years. So now we're really concerned because it's always opposite and we make sure there's definitely going to be a recession, because we haven't seen anything that good in a long time.

Okay, thank you very much.

Thanks, Todd

And our next question comes from the line of Sean Hannan with Needham & company. Please proceed with your question. Sean Hannan - Needham & Company : Great, thank you. Good afternoon.

Good afternoon Sean. Sean Hannan - Needham & company : So, listen, If I can just -- I just want to make sure I can clarify a couple of things. This is a 12 months programming in consolidating some of these operations, this is -- or the programs that we already have underway, which we've already discussed, we're not talking about anything new and incremental, correct?

No, you know just once again, the major properties, I think the Jersey city's property will be hopefully realized in the first or second quarter.

Yeah, we haven't recognized the profit from the sales of Jersey City property yet, we had some just some technical regulatory stuff we're going through at the moment. Sean Hannan - Needham & Company : Okay

Although all those property has been sold physically sold and ownership has changed hands, we have not recognized the profit yet. Sean Hannan - Needham & Company : And regarding, while we are going forward we haven't taken out any reserves yet for the program that we are going to implement in the next 12 months or so.

No. Sean Hannan - Needham & Company : Okay. And so when I think about that $485,000 charge, this is specific to the fourth quarter, right?

Yes Sean Hannan - Needham & Company : And so this is, is there any reason why just from thinking about your core operations, why this shouldn't be included and really thought of more as a restructuring charge to your COGS line or how should we be thinking about that?

Well it was a restructuring charge. If I had my (inaudible) I would've liked to netted it out against the income from Macau, but obviously I can't do that. So it is a one time. Going through in next year we have additional initiatives going on as far as restructuring in Asia, and we will have some expenses. We don't expect them to be outrageous expenses, but we will have some ongoing expenses. Each quarter we expect - not so much in the first quarter but more in the second quarter and third quarter and a little bit in the fourth quarter going forward in Asia. Sean Hannan - Needham & Company : Okay, and with that effectively was embedded in your COGS line?

Yes, correct. Sean Hannan - Needham & Company : Yes, okay. Okay and then so you've just mentioning that you were hoping to get your lead time down from four to six weeks. Where are we today?

Sea we are getting trouble here. We are hopping we are currently 14 weeks to 16 weeks we are hoping our first step is to get it eight to twelve weeks and our goal is probably to six to eight weeks but realistically I think we feel comfortable with eight weeks. Sean Hannan - Needham & Company : Okay. And then Cisco they have been a 10% customer for a couple quarters now, how significant were they in the December quarter?

They are over 10%. Sean Hannan - Needham & Company : Okay, have they remained in that 10% to 20% range.

We don't give an exact number we just tell the 10% Sean Hannan - Needham & Company : Okay

But they are definitely substantial customer of ours and it's safe to say, if Cisco goes, Bel will go, with the tip of the tail of the dog and Cisco is definitely the big to (inaudible). Sean Hannan - Needham & Company : Okay. And then lastly, over the last few quarters, a lot of your mixes really been, it seem you are shifting towards modules while some of your magnetic and with your MagJack pricing headwinds being a factor there. I guess what my ultimate question is, when we think about the modules group, perhaps nearing the 30% range for your business overall. can you talk about the sustainability of the growth of that group, as a portion of your mix and then the impacts to your model overall?

I will discuss the sales growth. Once again regarding the MagJack integrated connector module which is part of magnetics, we took this product line from basically $10 million to $120 million over a three year period, and it looks now right now, its leveling off and its flat basically based on price pressure. We knew that where we got in to power, I think our power running around $40 million or run rate about 40 million. And we’re hoping that, we were hoping to see 20% growth or more till we get to about $100 million, $120 million. Once again, we -- there is no question either the power or the module group are strongest growth opportunities over the next three years without an acquisition in other area. Sean Hannan - Needham & Company : Okay. So, from a growth standpoint today to think of the power modules group, in its 20 percentageish range?

Yes. And all other goods are probably 0% to 5%. I think once again a lot depends on the unit price. But a lot of times, the units are going up but the prices are going down quicker than that. Sean Hannan - Needham & Company : Okay. So with those types of year-over-year growth rates, that's basically how we should be thinking about the March quarter in the absence of any specific guidance?

Yes, good, Chinese New Year has messed things up a little bit, and so things are on a wreck. We do have one major customer in the DC to DC area who did push out some productions in January and to push it out one month and that could have a wide impact, will have an impact I think in the first quarter, but there is no cancellation, just a slight push out on their program. But, that's the only thing I can think of, Sean. Sean Hannan - Needham & Company : Okay, and that push out was from the first quarter to the second quarter then?

Well actually, it was a one month push out, so it will impact instead of getting three months of deliveries in the first quarter basically we get two months of delivery and that volume will roll into the second quarter. Sean Hannan - Needham & Company : Okay, that’s helpful. Thanks very much

Thanks Sean

(Operator Instructions) And our next question comes the line of Bill [Falesia with Falesia associates]. Please proceed with your question.

Good Morning.

Good Morning, Bill.

Yeah, I've noticed that the stock prices, it's fairly depressed and it continues to go down. What if anything have you done to increase shareholder value for the last quarter or so?

Once again we don't look at quarter-to-quarter increase shareholder value. So that's something that we won't address. And what we look to for again in the long-term is how we can grow the company. Once again I think if you look at all industry there has been a downturn in most everybody out to start. However from our standpoint, for us to get the company where we want it be, we feel that, with our war chest of $113 million the acquisitions is going to be a better way to do it and we are spending a tremendous amount of time looking at acquisition opportunities. But that's not going to be from a quarter-to-quarter standpoint, however as we did say before we are streamlining the operations as much as possible, we have got that about redundancies we got eliminated and if you look at our probabilities, one of our best profit quarters that we ever had, this is our second best sales quarter. So I don't think from our products we have in our basket, I don't we could have done so much better job and we did do in the last quarter.

Now I noticed that you've been purchasing the A shares, could you comments on why are you only purchasing the A shares and I did some rough math and I guess the average prices of your purchases were around $35, is that ended now or is that going to continue and when was your last purchase of A shares?

I think our last purchase was about two weeks ago and once again we just go in got it addressing.

We are going (inaudible) Bill we are going in and out of the market at different times. In terms -- if for strategic reasons we go in and go out, sometimes we don't think it's appropriate when we are getting these earnings to be in the market and so we come out for a while but you are right the average price was round about that, I think at the $35 mark. We buy, typically when we are in the market we buy at around maximum level by everyday. Sometimes we don’t get it. But we still feel that, if you look at the opportunities for shareholder value. share buyback is certainly the best way to add shareholder value of vis-à-vis having the money sitting in the bank, there is no doubt about that.

And why you are just purchasing A shares and how much is left that the Board authorized to repurchase?

I don’t have the number in front of me. We're no where near, I think we got a quite a ways we can go yet. Sorry, I don’t have the number, I'll have to look at it afterwards, it will be in the annual report. We think A is a smarter move for us to repurchase A, there is smaller slowdown there. We don’t want to screw up the float in the B. People know there is small floating A, and there is not as much trading in A, so it makes more sense for us to be dealing in that area. The B that's the much larger float, we want to make -- continue to make that attractive through folks out there, who want to participate in Bel's future.

Also the [float] A goes 10% below the B then both shares are combined together, I hope you knew that.

No, I didn’t know that. Also one last question, just wondered if you can comment on progress or any acquisition or acquisition strategy that you might have?

No, (inaudible) we've looked once again, last two companies we've looked. I won't give you names, but I can tell you, one company had sales of $30 million and EBITDA of $15 million, and our bid was $60 million and they said, they had a bid of $120 million. Last company we looked at about a week ago, we walked out again. They had sales of $25 million, a trialing EBITDA of $6 million, the highest EBITDA they've ever had, and our bid was $42 million, and the bid that they said they had on the table was $45 million, and both times we lost out to equity funds, hedge funds. So once again, we're just not going to buy to buy, and we really can't see how these companies -- we can bring a lot of synergies and a lot of growth potential for these type of companies, which these funds can't do it, but they are still, we still see a lot, even though you hear a lot of things out there negative about hedge funds not having money and not having borrowing, we haven’t come across that yet.

But you still remain fairly active in that, that's good to know.

Yeah, but once again, just that -- we thought at this point, it will be lot more difficult for people to raise money and we haven't seen that yet. But if there is a recession, we do feel that's an ideal time for us to really go on there with our war chest and take advantage of it.

Fair enough thank you.

Bill, just, we have the authority to buy up to 10% of the outstanding shares so we got ways to go yet.

That's the A and B, right?

Yeah, A and B combined. Yeah, and the total quote is what Colin?

Fairly close, bit over $12 million.

So $1.2 million.

Thank you.

And there appears to be no further question from the phone lines.

Thank you very much for joining us today, and hopefully we'll speak to you next quarter.

Ladies and gentlemen, that does conclude the conference call for today. We thank you for your participation and ask that you please disconnect your lines.