Good morning. Welcome to the Brandywine Realty Trust Second Quarter Earnings Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speakers’ remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to turn the conference over to Mr. Jerry Sweeney, President and CEO. Sir, you may begin.

Thank you very much. Good morning, everyone, and thank you all for participating in our second quarter earnings conference call. On today’s call with me as usual are George Johnstone, Executive Vice President of Operations; Tom Wirth, our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; and Dan Palazzo, our Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer. Prior to beginning, certain information discussed during our call may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Federal Securities law. Although we believe estimates reflected in these statements are based on reasonable assumptions, we cannot give assurance that the anticipated results will be achieved. For further information on factors that could impact our anticipated results, please reference our press release as well as our most recent annual and quarterly reports that we file with the SEC. So, to kick off, as we normally do, I will provide an overview of our three key business plan components, George will then discuss 2016 leasing and operating efforts and then will turn the call over to Tom to review our financial and balance sheet results. So looking at the quarter some significant distribution activity in quarter one, second quarter was relatively quiet for us. Our focus for the quarter remained on operational performance and executing our 2016 business plan. That focus is paying off, as we’ve had a very strong year thus far in 2016. During the first half of this year, we made significant progress on our business plan and advanced our investment and balance sheet objectives. On the investment front, we have executed 97% of our $850 million disposition target with the potential to exceed this level. Our 2016 dispositions will substantially complete our portfolio repositioning strategy and going forward it’s really fine tuning our submarket positioning to drive value creation. Just as a frame…

Thank you, Jerry. It was another productive quarter that has led us to nearly completing the business plan with solid operating metrics on a transitioning portfolio. Leasing activity remains robust in all of our markets. The pipeline excluding development properties stands at 2.2 million square feet with over 200,000 square feet in lease negotiations. Turning to our three core markets, our 98% leased CBD Philadelphia portfolio outpaces the market by 850 basis points. Leasing spreads remain robust and forward rollover exposure has been reduced to 3.3% in 2017 and 8.4% in 2018. The overall outlook for the greater Philadelphia region remains encouraging. Unemployment is down year-over-year and positive absorption occurred in the fifth -- for the fifth consecutive quarter. Second quarter absorption was 272,000 square feet, raising the total for the year to 435,000 square feet. The west of Broad submarket absorption is even more favorable with 665,000 square feet for the year. The Crescent Markets continue to operate in a similar strong fashion, where we’re outpacing market vacancy by 440 basis points. Our 99% leased Radnor portfolio has seen strong double-digit rent growth during the year. Our continued lack of inventory in Radnor has forced expanding tenancies towards King of Prussia pressure, as evidenced by our development at 933 First Avenue. That known move-out and a few others in 2017 will allow us to accommodate other expanding Radnor tenancies, open the submarket to out of market tenants and provide an opportunity to increase leasing spreads. Overall, second quarter suburban Pennsylvania absorption was 726,000 square feet, raising the year-to-date total to 954,000 square feet. This increased submarket demand has translated into solid leasing spreads for our portfolio at 12.6% on a GAAP basis and 3.7% on a cash basis. Turning to Metro DC, job growth surpassed the rate of growth…

Thank you, George. Our second quarter FFO totaled $57.4 million $0.32 per diluted share. Some observations on our second quarter results: Same store growth of second quarter was 2.9 GAAP, 1.1 cash both excluding termination fees and other income items. We have now had 21 consecutive positive quarters of GAAP growth and 17 for the cash metric. G&A expense decreased to 6.1, which is below our previous $6.6 million guidance. Our second quarter G&A was below forecast, primarily due to some lower professional fees. FFO contribution from our unconsolidated joint ventures totaled $8.9 million, above our first quarter projection by $0.4 million, primarily due to improvements in our Austin and DC portfolios. Interest expenses decreased to $19.8 million, a $3.9 million sequential reduction from the first quarter, primarily due to the retirement of the bonds and using cash on hand and a refinancing of Two Logan Square to a much lower interest rate. Compared to 2Q ‘15, our quarterly interest expense excluding capitalized interest has now decreased 24% due to the debt reductions and lower interest rates on the refinancing. Our second quarter CAD totaled $37.2 million or $0.21 per diluted share, representing a 76.2% payout ratio. During the quarter, we incurred 10.5 million of revenue maintaining capital and 6.5 of revenue creating capital. Looking forward to our third quarter 2016, property level operating income will be approximately $75.5 million, a sequential increase from the second quarter by $3.5 million, primarily coming from same-store portfolio and FMC Tower. G&A expense for the third quarter will be approximately $6.6 million and the full year will be approximately $28.5 million. Other income, we expect third quarter to be $0.5 million with our full year estimate of $2.8 million and term fees will be $0.6 million for the third quarter and our full…

Tom, thank you; George, thank you as well. So, to wrap up, our 2016 business plan is very much on track. We really do have excellent momentum in the operating platform. We believe we’ll continue to generate solid NOI growth, strong same-store performance, positive market to market to create both the growing earning stream, and net asset value. Focus for the balance of ‘16 is on operational excellence, achieving all of our business plan goals, executing the last phases of our portfolio repositioning strategy, and ensuring we have one of the best operating and growth platforms in our sector. Key proprieties remain leasing, generating cash through sales and improving cash flows, reducing leverage, pursuing internal growth opportunities through executing on our existing and future development pipeline. With that, we thank you for your participation. We’d be delighted to open up the floor for questions. As we always do, we ask that in the interest of time, you limit yourself to one question and a follow-up. So, thank you very much.

[Operator Instructions] And your first question comes from the line of Michael Lewis with SunTrust.

My first question, is the stock price getting close to where you could think about opportunistically issuing equity or are property sales just the better way to go? And then in either case, what are your thoughts on use of proceeds?

Well look we -- as we said here today as we indicated before, I think our team firmly believes that our best path to raising capital is to harvest value add of our existing asset base. We still feel as though the sales market has some legs to it; we’re getting good pricing on a per square foot and a cap rate basis. So, that remains the major driver of generating liquidity for the Company. Look, I think as we mentioned in both Tom and my comments, as we look at the application of those proceeds, it’s really to generate sufficient liquidity to have an ample cushion in the event that the market does in fact turn, have the capacity to continue our development and deleveraging strategy. Certainly looking ahead, Michael, to 2017, we have $300 million of bonds coming due in May at about a 5.7% interest rate. We have preferreds that are callable on the first quarter with the high coupon on it. So, certainly, as we look at capital allocation and balance sheet strategy, raising cash to pay off at least a portion of those 2016 bonds and retire the preferreds as well as funding the existing development pipeline, really are major drivers [indiscernible] we see ourselves allocating capital. We don’t really have any acquisitions build into our current plan. We’re continuing to invest, as Tom laid out, the money in our predevelopment pipeline. But I think that’s how we view the world on a very straight forward basis. Certainly, I think we’re as happy as all the other management teams with the continued traction of the REIT marketplace and the index moving up as well as our sector. But certainly that doesn’t change our perspective that as we view the world today, our best direct path to achieving better operating performance, repositioning our portfolio, generating better forward growth and deleveraging our balance sheet is by continuing what we have been doing, which is simply recycling some assets for sale.

And then, my unrelated follow-up, so, you bought some land in Austin; could you maybe talk about land costs and competition and your appetite for filling your land bank?

Look, I think we did acquire parcel in Austin that we think is very well located, will fit very much into our competitive profile in that market. But we also -- excuse me, concurrent with acquiring that land, have significant piece of that land under agreement to sell to a third-party residential developer and a hotel developer. So, it will reduce our overall investment base on the remaining land from an office standpoint, achieve getting some co-contributors for overall master planning and site infrastructure costs. And it’s very consistent with our program of looking at our future office developments being part of mixed used communities. We will wind up having a net investment base in that property about $10 million or so after we recover the sale proceeds. But in addition to that, I think as we also put in the supplemental package, we have approximately $40 million of land under agreement, some of those land parcels going through approvals by the buyers. But, we would certainly look at recovering some land equity, so to speak over the next couple of quarters. The game plan is to run our land inventory base kind of in 2% to 3% of asset base range, and that’s kind of what we are targeting to in terms of our, both our land acquisition and our land disposition activities. Frankly, the land prices, we are saying an escalation of land prices in several of our markets. And we are thankful that we have a good land base in those markets. If there is a depth to selling some of the land holdings we view as a non-core, frankly in a couple other markets we are seeing land prices remain fairly stable. So, it’s submarket by submarket call. But even as we evaluate additional land acquisitions, it’s always under the guides of kind of maintaining that 2% to 3% of asset base on land but more importantly financing those land acquisition opportunities through the dispositions of land that we give as non-core to our business plan going forward.

Your next question comes from the line of David Toti with BB&T Capital Markets.

Just a quick question with regard to dispositions; the other suburban market’s about 8% of your NOI; I know you touched on this a little bit. But, how close are those to being earmarked for sale? And, when you think about the drag on the portfolio, what’s the urgency on some of those sales given the occupancy delta and the growth delta of a lot of those assets?

I think we continue go through our quarterly review process of every single asset we own and identify targets for either -- properties for either reinvestment, a more targeted leasing strategy or for disposition efforts. So, when we look at our pipeline of projects as, Dave, we have in the market today, I mean they are in every one of our markets; they are in Pennsylvania suburbs, both core and non-core submarkets; in Maryland; in Virginia; in New Jersey and Delaware. So, certainly, the disposition plan runs the full gamut of all of our different submarkets. So, as I mentioned in my comments, I think we are -- this repositioning that we are just about completed on has really created I think a very good operating platform. But that doesn’t mean that we are going to be any less diligent on pruning assets we think don’t have a growth profile that we can achieve by allocating dollars elsewhere.

And just as a follow-up to that in terms of the dilution on those potential sales, is it your estimation that that would be slightly lighter from a dilution perspective on ongoing sales? I would assume it to be a tighter spread to what’s been sold in the past.

Yes, look, certainly. I mean, the bulk of our sales are already booked in, in our current plan. So, as you know, we essentially have got $25 million more to do on our $850 million of sales. As we start to go through that target and look to formulate our 2017 business plan, I think we do have very good uses of those proceeds in terms of paying down debt that certainly from a cash flow standpoint will be massively accretive. And certainly, we hope to keep the earnings trajectory moving forward at the pace that we’ve outlined for 2016. So, yes, I mean, certainly, the bulk of our deposition activity really occurred 2014, 2015, and 2016. And we really do think that juxtaposing the future sale campaign with developments coming on line will create a better balance sheet, better forward growth profile and much more manageable capital cost.

Your next question comes from the line of Craig Mailman with KeyBanc Capital Markets.

Jerry, you kind of touched on the fact that you guys had thought same-store was going to come down in the second quarter because of some of the known move-outs. But, it looks like to hit the guidance, which you guys raised last quarter, it’s going to be a pretty substantial ramp in the back half of the year. Could you just walk through the drivers to get you there?

Sure, I’ll kick off that. I mean, certainly one of the things we look at is exactly by submarket what our same-store growth numbers are. And to amplify your observation, we clearly knew from the time we rolled out our original business plan that Q2 was going to be below our range in both in terms of occupancy, leasing levels but also same-store. And as we look at Q3 and Q4, particularly having 97% of the plan already baked, I think we have a high degree of confidence that the same-store numbers in those quarters will on a combined basis put us within our targeted ranges. I mean, George, anything to add there?

Yes. I mean, I think the continued burn-off of free rent is also a player. So, as we get to really the fourth quarter, that’s when you really see some lift coming through the same-store on a cash perspective.

And then, Jerry, you’d noted that you are seeing some increased build-to-suit opportunities across several markets. Can you go through maybe which markets in particular; is this on some of the newer land that you guys have been purchasing, kind of some updates there?

Yes, sure, happy to. I think when we take a look at across the markets in the Philadelphia suburbs, in Philadelphia proper, both the CBD and University City, we’re talking to a couple of prospects about the build-to-suit opportunities on both land we’ve held but also some new land holdings. The other market where we’re seeing a very significant number of build-to-suit opportunities is in our Austin market, both in the southwest and the northwest. So, we’re pretty encouraged by the pace of those. But we were very happy, Craig, last quarter, when we were able to take a tenant who was paying below market rents in Radnor who needed to more than double in size, move them to a piece of ground we owned in King of Prussia to do a fully leased $29 million build-to-suit on 110,000 square feet at a 9.5% free and clear return, and then create that vacancy that we desperately needed in Radnor to accommodate both, existing tenant expansions and also move that tenant from a below -- that tenant space from a below market return to a market return that’s much higher. We certainly see that same opportunity with some of the build-to-suit candidates we’re talking to now who -- a couple of whom are in our existing portfolio, some are new which we’re certainly excited about that as well. But, I think it does reflect what we’re seeing across the board, which is really a driver of a lot of our investment strategy that a lot of our tenants are recognizing that now and for the foreseeable future, labor markets will be tight, access to labor will be very important and that the ability to have a physical space that is a cultural builder and brand builder for their companies is very, very important. So, we do think that -- continued work with some of our existing customers to new customers to work with them to design and build brand new office product is a great business strategy for us over the next couple of years. And certainly from a numbers perspective, the extent we can achieve 8% to 10% free and clear returns on long-term leases is very consistent with our strategic objective narrowing that line between or that gap between FFO and cash flow, because we sign these longer term leases, it’s NOI equals cash flow say for some minor capital repairs over the term of their lease. So, we’re excited about seeing that opportunity continue to play itself out in our markets.

And just to go back to same-store real quick; Tom or George, how much free rent was there in the second quarter and how much of that burns off by year end?

I just have it as the straight line component not the free versus the step up.

Craig, we can get back to you on that. But, we do see our straight line was 6.5 million for just a straight line, forgetting deferred market rents. But we do see that’s decreasing over the next several quarters. So, I think that does show the most of that. If there is a lot of free rent than that 6.5, we can get back to you on the component.

Your next question comes from the line of Anthony Paolone with J.P. Morgan.

I think in your guidance, you just have one start on the development side the rest of this year, but you talked about going into next year; I guess you have redevelopment of Broadmoor perhaps, and downtown Austin and then Schuylkill Yards. I am just wondering how you think about sizing the pipeline as you look out the next few years as you get later into the cycle as well.

Certainly, I think, we chatted about this on our call last quarter. As we look forward to 2017, certainly FMC is coming fully on line; we have 933 First coming online midyear; so, a number of properties moving from kind of under construction into full development -- or into full operations. And 1900 Market, as I mentioned, we have that pretty much -- at the tailwind of that process we are looking for some approvals to complete the final stage of that renovation. But certainly, in 2017, we just have budgets some capital for any remaining TI on some of the vacancies there. We have the Subaru National Training Service Center that will be entering construction, so anticipate about $17 million, $18 million spend on that next year. Jumping to like a Schuylkill Yards, we still remain very much in the approval and master planning phase on that. As we identified in the supplemental, we anticipate that will be a $10 million to $15 million spend through year 2017. And then certainly, to the extent we get any of these build-to-suits pulled together, that would certainly change the amount of dollars directed towards those undertakings. But as we look forward certainly having a development pipeline in the 5% to 10% of asset base range is where we are comfortable. The reality though is that that pipeline needs to be pretty heavily preleased as we start looking forward over the next couple of years.

And then for Tom, it seems like the business plan is pretty buttoned up at this point. What are the key swing factors to get to the higher or lower end of the guidance range?

Yes. I think on the guidance range, I think is there to also take care of if we do anymore dispositions, and I mean we haven’t added any to the plan. As Jerry mentioned, we have quite a bit on the market. So, we did want to leave room while that dilution will be back half of the year, so not a full year effect. They could definitely move our FFO target and we just want to stay within our range of that side. On the First side, we do -- as George just mentioned some leasing momentum we expect to carry through into the second half of the year. So, I think that we have a chance to also see that upper end just hit because of improved leasing. So, that’s why we left the range where it is.

So, the low end gives you room for asset sales kind of beyond what you had penciled in?

Correct, yes. We have left the low end there to go beyond the 850.

Your next question comes from the line of Manny Korchman with Citi.

Jerry, if we were to look at all the assets you have out in the market right now in totality, what -- how much more could you or would you be selling, if you sold everything compared to your 850 target?

Look, we have really about $50 million in the market right now that are kind of in the negotiation phase, maybe a few more to add on to that and then have about another $100 million of assets that are entering the market for kind of full launch latter part of the summer after Labor Day. So, it’s kind of interesting, Manny. We look at it -- the average deal size what we have in the market right now that are negotiations is only $17 million, the largest assets less than 50 million total and the average cap rate is kind of below the 7% range. So, I think we just want a little more visibility on how some of those discussions go before we look at -- make any modification to $850 million sales target.

And then, Jerry, if we can go back to an earlier comment you made, you talked about paying down debt next year and that being massively accretive to cash flow. Do you mean just using the cash you have on hand to be massively accretive or how are you thinking about additional asset sales being accretive in the context of debt pay downs? I was just a little bit confused by the comment.

Yes. I think when we take a look at this, we’re able to pay down higher price debt and finance that through the sales of assets that may have a cash flow return after capital lower than that. So, we’re obviating the need to make investments in tenant improvement dollars that relate to assets we don’t think are generating a lot of growth for us. We think that’s positive trade for the Company.

[Operator Instructions] Your next question comes from the line of Jamie Feldman with Bank of America.

George mentioned a couple of known move-outs in 2017 in his comments. Can you talk us through what you know at this point on ‘17? And then also maybe give a little bit more color on some of the moves around in Radnor and King of Prussia that we’ve seen some of the brokers talk about?

Yes, sure. And George and I’ll tag team this. A couple of move-outs that we anticipate, don’t know definitely for sure, but anticipate for ‘17 are a number of those are frankly, Jamie, in buildings that we anticipate selling. So, certainly over the next couple of months as we start to think about our ‘17 business plan, we would anticipate the next quarter would give you a lot more visibility on that question. But, George, maybe in terms of Radnor bring Jamie up to speed.

Yes, I think in terms of Radnor, I mean, the deal we did in moving our tenant out for the build-to-suit in King of Prussia, I mean that was just an all around good move for us. One, it put a piece of land in play for us in King of Prussia. We could not accommodate that tenant’s growth in our Radnor portfolio. We’ve got tenants -- we’ve got another tenant that we’ve lost to a competitor who had the same expansion need. So, they’re going to take some vacancy in Chesterbrook that takes that competition out of play. That’s now opened the door for tenants that we do have in our Radnor portfolio that need to expand up at the corporate center. And it quite frankly opens up that Radnor submarket to tenants who have been trying to get to a Radnor zip code and the lack of inventory has just really prevented that over the last several years.

Yes, I think thematically what we’re saying is what we hope for, which is that you’re seeing Radnor’s had great success. It’s at a price point that frankly doesn’t fit every single customer we talk to. So, we’re seeing the corollary impact of market improvement by being able to move rents up in the King of Prussia market, drafting off of Radnor and Conshohocken, still getting very good rates of return on King of Prussia market. And even with that move out of that tenant Radnor, we desperately needed frankly that inventory to really accommodate some existing tenant expansion requirements but also keep Radnor very much in the marketing flow of deals.

And our mark-to-market in Radnor this year is 14% on a GAAP basis and 7% on a cash basis, so just an opportunity to kind of churn some of these below market leases.

So, if I heard you right, you feel like the submarkets will stay pretty stable over the next couple years?

Absolutely.

Absolutely, we actually think Radnor will continue to improve, particularly given some of the expansion of the retail bases that you’re seeing along the Route 30, continued easy accessibility, potentially some rail line improvements. So, we actually remain very optimistic on Radnor’s performance.

And then, to your comment on the move-out, you said mostly in buildings that you plan to sell, but are there some that aren’t? As we sit here today, how should we think about potential vacancy hits to next year?

The largest one we have quite frankly is in our remaining holdings in California. So, that’s a building that we know we’re going to lose Wells Fargo; we’re marketing that property; we’ve had a lot of interest in that Concord submarket since Wells announced that they were going to move out. One -- another sizeable deal in suburban Maryland which is not on the long term holds process. And then we’ve got the one I just mentioned a minute ago, in Radnor, the 50,000 square feet with Hartford.

So, I guess to ask it another way, what’s the largest space you plan to keep in the portfolio that is moving out, other than the Radnor one?

It’s probably in that 15,000 square foot range.

And then, can you maybe talk more -- you had some pretty optimistic comments on DC job growth, just maybe some big picture comments on what you’re seeing in the market and what you are expecting in the market?

We continue to be pleased with our performance down there. I mean, Toll Road holdings that at 92% are outpacing the market, the fact that jobs are -- continue to grow and that the jobs aren’t necessarily government contractor related, they’re more professional service related, bodes well. The enriched amenities that we’ve put into our Dulles Corner properties and our Tysons properties have paid off for us; and that’s what’s led us to that improved occupancy level.

And your next question comes from the line of John Guinee from Stifel.

First, a sort of a leasing question for you. What you guys are showing is pretty good mark-to-market on a gross basis and very low CapEx, less than $10 per square foot, $1.60 a square foot per lease year. Any idea how those mark-to-markets look after you account for the reset of the OpEx, operating expenses; do they look as good on a net basis?

Those mark-to-markets include the OpEx reset.

So, they are on a net basis, John.

Aren’t these gross rents at $25 and $29?

We take the expiring rent and the expiring OpEx contribution and compare that with a go-forward rent and OpEx contribution. So, they’re gross. So, that’s -- if it’s $25, that potentially could be $24 and $1 of OpEx reimbursement.

We’ll catch that offline. Then, the second question is we’re going through your development strategy, and it looks like you’ve got a couple sites in the Austin suburbs; you have a site in the Austin CBD; you’ve got DC pretty well covered at northeast, southwest markets, Boston, and the Toll Road, got a lot of dirt at Schuylkill Yards, I think in Plymouth meeting. Do you have any dirt or any development sites in the CBD in the Cira area or in Radnor?

We have -- we purchased a site last year in the CBD in Philadelphia at the 2,100 Block of Market Street that is we have kind of in CBD Philadelphia. In University City, we have a project along Market Street that has a vacant lot that we can build on that set part of our overall Schuylkill Yards master plan. At the current time, you mentioned in Radnor, the current time we don’t have any land holdings in Radnor for additional building. We are certainly looking at re-planning some of our existing facilities to see if can create additional density. But that’s part of the master planning process still kind of in early stages of its evolution.

Then my last question, I think you mentioned three move-outs in 2017, Hartford, Wells Fargo, the Maryland suburbs and just deciding to bite the bullet and sell the building after these tenants move out. Are you guys selling these buildings at 50 bucks a foot or $300 a foot? And how do the economics work in terms of going from FFO or you might get a 12, 13 yield on the ultimate sale of a vacant building; how do those numbers work?

It varies by profit. As I George touched on with our property in two building complex in California, we are anticipating losing Wells Fargo but it looks as they will stand for a descent piece of the space. More importantly, we have some very good prospects there that we think we can walk away as part of the overall sales campaign. So, I think that will be something that will be a viable sale candidate in the market on terms that make sense for us. The couple of the smaller buildings at Pennsylvania suburbs where we are losing a tenant or two, they tend to be smaller buildings. So, we are actually marketing those to potential users who might want to occupy those buildings for their own use or to some small investors who may look at kind of redeveloping the building, once they buy it. So, the numbers there on a per square foot basis look pretty good. Certainly, deals like that are fairly small in total dollar value. So, we certainly think that we can achieve our historical pace of sales at the cap rates we have historically achieved; they’ll be blended into an overall picture that make sense for the Company.

Your next question comes from the line of Janie Jamie Feldman with Bank of America.

I guess just one last question from me. Can you talk more about the leasing pipeline at FMC Tower? No progress in the second quarter, but it sounds like you’ve had a good pipeline. Maybe talk about what kind of tenants; and then, is there any spillover to some of the other potential projects you have in the area? So that sounds like you have more demand than you do space.

We are very happy with the level of demand that we are seeing. Certainly with the initial tenant moving in, other tenants scheduled to be moving in very shortly, the project really is presenting itself better and better every single day. The amount of activity coming through the building, now that it’s alive and vibrant, certainly puts us in a very good position I think to accelerate the marketing campaign. The range of prospects, again, we already completed one multitenant floor. We have several other floors what we are planning on multi-tenanting. We have -- and that’s from a range of companies who are both in the existing Philadelphia markets but also at the suburban and New Jersey markets who are looking to move into Philadelphia. And then, we have a number of single or multiple floor users who are actively discussing a move into to FMC. So, I think we still feel very good about it. We certainly think the project presents itself even better than some of the market folks thought they might be. So, the demand there, we’ll see what the depth of it in terms of how much that spills over into our other projects because our major priority right now is making sure that we get at FMC leased up. But certainly, rental rates, lease terms, capital dollars are all holding very firm to what we initially thought.

And what is the delay? Why do you think it’s taking a while to seal up the last 20% of the building?

I’m not sure. We’re in the summer, so that protracts as we see every year on every project decision timelines. Some of these tenants we’re talking to, it’s a locational move for them into a different submarket, so there is a lot of facts that we need to think through there in terms of employee commuting times, relocations et cetera. So, I don’t think we deal with any abnormal level of delay. I think when we just took a look at the pipeline, took a look at what some of those targeted occupancy dates were, we just thought that we would take a look at move in the stabilization day back a bit to make sure that we capture a conservative view on when people actually start paying rent.

Your next question comes from the line of Craig Mailman with KeyBanc Capital Markets.

Hey, Jerry; it’s Jordan Sadler, just a follow-up on development. Is it your sense that the environment in downtown is strong enough to support or consider a new start this cycle? So, was 2100 a possible go? I mean, you just sort of -- on the heels of that commentary on FMC, it sounds like you are optimistic. And just as you are putting this one through, could this thing work out for this cycle development?

We’ve bought 2100 Market to create a part of land bank in what we say is a real high growth part in Philadelphia. We’re operating it currently as a parking lot, and that’s the existing plan. I mean we’re doing some -- a lot of planning work on it to take a look at what the potential uses could be, it could be office; it could be a combination of office and residential; retail base structured parking. So certainly, we have it in the mix as part of our marketing presentations in terms of our greater Philadelphia portfolio. But that certainly is not something that’s own on our immediate term radar screen starting right away. Now, if somebody’s prospects we’re talking to show a real high definitive level of interest, they want us to move, we can certainly accommodate that request. But I didn’t mean to imply that that’s on our near term development story absent a very heavy prelease.

Is it entitled for -- currently with it -- I mean, it’s obviously being operated as a parking lot, but…

No. We would have to go; we would have to, Jordan, go through the approval process on that project.

At this time, I would like to turn the call back over to Jerry Sweeney for closing remarks.

Great, thank you very much. Thank you everyone for joining us for the call. We certainly appreciate your continued engagement with the Company; look forward to updating you on our third quarter call, at which point in time as we always do, we’ll roll out 2017 guidance. So, thank you again and enjoy the rest of the summer.

Ladies and gentlemen, this does conclude today’s conference call. You may now disconnect.