Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Portman Ridge Fourth Quarter 2021 Financial Results Conference Call. Please be advised today's conference may be recorded. I'd now like to hand the conference over to your host today, Serena Liegey. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Good morning, and welcome to Portman Ridge Finance Corporation’s Full Year 2021 Earnings Conference Call. An earnings press release was distributed yesterday, March 10, after market close. A copy of the release, along with an earnings presentation, is available on the company's website at www.portmanridge.com in the Investor Relations section and should be reviewed in conjunction with the company's Form 10-K filed yesterday with the SEC. As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded for replay purposes. Please note that today's conference call may contain forward-looking statements, which are not guarantees of future performance or results and involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors, including those described in the company's filings with the SEC. Portman Ridge Finance Corporation assumes no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements unless required by law. With that, I would like to now turn the call over to Ted Goldthorpe, Chief Executive Officer of Portman Ridge. Please go ahead, Ted.

Thank you. Good morning, and thanks, everyone, for joining our full year 2021 earnings call. I'm joined today by our Chief Financial Officer, Jason Roos; and our Chief Investment Officer, Patrick Schafer. I'll provide brief highlights on the company's performance and activities for 2021, and Patrick will provide commentary on our investment portfolio and our markets. Jason will then discuss our operating results and financial condition in greater detail. Yesterday afternoon, Portman Ridge announced its full year 2021 results. We are pleased to report a very strong year of earnings, portfolio performance and investment activity. For 2021, our net investment income increased to $42 million or $4.92 per share, our core net investment income increased to $25.4 million or $2.97 per share and NAV for the year increased to $280.1 million or $28.88 per share. All of these improved metrics reflect broad-based improvements in our debt portfolio investments and joint ventures. On the corporate front, we took steps to leverage fixed costs, lower our cost of capital and reduce expenses relative to our asset base. We generated interest savings by -- driven by a lower weighted average cost of debt. Furthermore, we maintained other operating expenses at a relatively stable level and believe the impact of these savings will continue to materialize over time as we continue to grow and reposition our portfolio to higher quality and higher yielding assets. Origination activity was robust during the year, and we continue to realize the strength of the BC Partners platform in generating attractive risk-adjusted opportunities. During the year, we continued participating in our stock repurchase program. And during the year, we repurchased shares in the open market transactions at an aggregate cost of approximately $1.8 million. As a result, our Board of Directors declared a $0.63 per share quarterly distribution, which represents a $0.01 increase from prior quarter levels and another $0.03 increase from preceding quarters. This marks the second quarter in a row of increased distributions. This increased quarterly distribution reflects the consistently improved performance of the company's operations and investment activities as well as the general economic outlook and related factors. The refinancing of our long-term fixed rate debt during 2021, especially now that the federal interest rates are rising, should result in significant interest savings and higher net investment income for Portman Ridge during the first half of 2022, all else being equal. We are well positioned and have the capacity to grow and increase the proportion of BC Partners’ originated assets. While we will continue to be proactive in repositioning our portfolio and several targets already under consideration, we will also take an opportunistic approach. With that, I will turn the call over to Patrick Schafer, our Chief Investment Officer, for a review of our investment activity.

Thanks, Ted. Turning first to the current market conditions. As already noted by most of our peers, the fourth quarter of 2021 was our most active quarter from an origination perspective and perhaps the second most active on exit and repayment front outside of Q4 2020 when we acquired Garrison. Although some of these trends abated in early Q1 due to the Omicron variant, Q4 activity was driven by ever-increasing return to business as usual in the U.S. and a desire for sellers to crystallize gains prior to year-end. As many of our sectors have noted, the market strength carried over from the first half of the year entered the second half. We had an active quarter in terms of originations and repayments, with originations materially outpacing repayments. Excluding revolving credit commitments, we invested a total of $108 million during the quarter and exited or repaid on investments with a carrying value of $78.1 million. With respect to debt originations, we made investments into 17 borrowers, of which 8 were existing borrowers. In total, all the 3 of these transactions were completed alongside other BC entities and the 3 transactions were all small investments in legacy Portman-only borrowers. Excluding short-term investments that were sold prior to the end of the quarter, 93% of new investments were in first-lien securities and 7% were in second-lien securities. The weighted average spread on the new investments was 721 basis points. Additionally, our Great Lakes joint venture returned a net $6.2 million during the quarter, and we opportunistically purchased $18.1 million of assets from JMP Group as reported on October 26, 2021, in a Form 8-K. On the repayments and disposition side, the fourth quarter was more active relative to last quarter due to the typical year-end rush. In total, we exited or repaid…

Thanks, Patrick. Given this is the time of year we provide annual results, I wanted to take this time to highlight some of the more notable achievements we were able to accomplish in 2021. I'll start with the sizable investment portfolio acquisitions done recently, of which we were able to earn an entire year of interest income from the $353 million of assets acquired from Garrison in Q4 2020. This resulted in a significant increase in interest income during 2021 and adds to our core investment income. We then added to this with the acquisition of HCAP with assets of $89 million in late second quarter 2021, which has had incremental contributions to core investment income with minimal purchase discount. Not only have we made progress on the asset side of the balance sheet, but we were able to reduce our cost of capital through the successful refinancing of $77.4 million of our 6.125% baby bonds. And even with the growth in the portfolio, we maintained our target leverage ratio. In addition, we completed a 10-for-1 reverse stock split effective August 26, 2021, which benefits our shareholders through enhanced capability to more efficiently invest in Portman shares. Accordingly, all common shares and per share metrics have been adjusted retroactively for the split. As Ted previously mentioned, during the year through these efforts, we improved our net asset value, net investment income, lowered net expenses as a percentage of total investment income and lowered our cost of capital. Our net asset value for the full year 2021 increased to $280.1 million or $28.88 per share from $216.3 million or $28.77 per share year-over-year, reflecting broad-based improvements in the debt portfolio investments and joint ventures. Total investment income for the full year 2021 was $80.1 million, of which $63.8 million was attributable…

Thank you, Jason. Before opening the floor to questions, I would like to address an important topic, which is the impact of rising rates. As other BDCs, the Portman Ridge investment income is affected by fluctuations in various interest rates, including LIBOR and prime rates. As of December 31, 2021, approximately 84% of our debt to securities portfolio was either floating rate with a spread to an interest rate index such as LIBOR or the prime rate. 75% of these floating rate loans contain LIBOR floors, ranging between 50 basis points and 200 basis points. As of December 31, 2021, we had approximately $352 million of borrowings outstanding, of which approximately 31% had a fixed rate and 69% had a floating rate component. As we move forward with new investments in 2022, we expect these portfolio investments to predominantly be floating rate investments. In periods of rising or lowering interest rates, the cost of the portion of debt associated with fixed rates, such as our 4.875% notes due 2026 would remain the same, while the costs associated with the borrowings on the revolving credit facility would fluctuate with changes in interest rates. An increase in the base rate index for floating rate investment assets would increase gross investment income and a decrease in the base rate would decrease gross investment income. In either case, such an increase or decrease may be limited by interest rate floors minimums for certain investment assets. A 1% increase in interest rates would have a negative impact of approximately $1.1 million to our net investment income, while a 2% and 3% increase in interest rates would have a positive impact of approximately $217,000 and $1.7 million, respectively. I'll close by saying we're very pleased with the progress we made during the year in terms of active repositioning, deleveraging and refinancing our long-term debt, and we continue to generate solid earnings results on a consistent and steady basis. We're also pleased to be in a great financial position and, for the second quarter in a row, increasing our distributions per share to our shareholders. Thank you once again to all our shareholders for ongoing support. This concludes our prepared remarks, and I'll now turn the call over to the operator for any questions.

Our first question comes from Christopher Nolan with Ladenburg Thalmann.

The increase in CLOs, was that related to the JMP acquisition?

Yes.

Okay. And then by my calculation, it looks like you guys did very little in the way of stock repurchases in the fourth quarter. Is that correct? And if so, does that indicate a change in capital management strategy?

Yes. No, I would characterize that as we had a lot of filings in the fourth quarter that were pretty much throughout the fourth quarter and our program had expired. So the windows were limited for us to reopen that. We -- and then we've been closed really since then with open filings. So we're -- I would not take that as an indication of view on market price.

Yes. We plan to buy back stock as soon as practically possible.

Okay. And is your leverage ratio still 1.25 to 1.40?

That's right.

Yes. That's our target window.

And final question, the realized gains, what was the driver on that? I might have missed it from Jason's comments.

Yes. I would say -- I mean we had 20-plus sales throughout the quarter. I would say there's not really one of any particular note more than another. And I would say the majority of that is a flip between realized and unrealized. There is very little NAV impact to that.

Our next question comes from Ryan Lynch with KBW.

First one, just a high level one. As we kind of look towards 2022, you guys had several busy years, a lot of acquisitions, redoing the capital structure, things like that. What -- how should we measure your guys' success in 2022? And then what are the goals that you guys wanted to accomplish for Portman in 2022?

Yes. It's a great question. So yes, I mean, I think the level of transaction activity, I think, is going to obviously slow. And we're really trying to point everybody towards our core earnings just because of some of the noise around the accretion. So we laid out in our investor deck and we tried to address it. So I think this year -- listen, I think we are pretty cautious going into this year just given everything going on. And this is even -- this is pre the Russian conflict. So even before that, I think we're getting pretty cautious. So I think our goal is to kind of keep leverage within our range. To the extent good acquisitions come along, we'll obviously take a look at them. But really, our goal is to continue to wring out costs out of our business and drive stable earnings and stable credit quality.

Okay. If that -- and then one question I had, you guys have a slide that you show the weighted average EBITDA for your debt portfolio is about $75 million in the fourth quarter. I'm just curious, do banks view by -- I don't know if there's a few transactions that you guys have that are maybe more like broadly syndicated loans that are really large to skew that number? Or -- how should we think about that? That feels pretty big relative to the size of your entity.

Yes. I'll start, and then I'll let Patrick jump in. Yes, I mean you're dead right. So when we took over the Garrison portfolio, some of their -- obviously, they had a on-balance sheet CLO and some of the assets in there skewed the numbers high. So our core franchise is really 10 to 50 EBITDA. So that number is a little misleading because it's skewed by a couple of things that we inherited in the Garrison transaction.

I think the only thing -- the other thing I'd add is, typically, if we're going to be in a junior position in the cap structure, like much larger businesses, much larger, more stable businesses. So some of that impact, it's tough to see exactly. But as we are exiting out of perhaps smaller company legacy second-lien positions and investing in kind of, I'll call it, a new second-lien position, the net second-lien securities will be flat, but we'll actually be high grading into larger, more stable businesses. So that's kind of some of our game plan as well. But I wouldn't read too much into that 75%. It is a little bit skewed away from what our kind of core franchise is.

Okay. Yes. That makes sense. And then how are you guys thinking about the dividend going forward? You guys have obviously -- you raised it twice. I think one comment that will be on Slide #5. You guys flagged, that's helpful to kind of flag kind of the core earnings that you guys have in 2021, which was $0.74 on a quarterly basis versus the $0.63. I'm just curious if that level of earnings is relatively sustainable going forward. It's a pretty big gap between operating earnings and kind of the dividend. So how -- every BDC kind of chooses to manage their dividend policy different. What is your thoughts regarding dividend? How you dividend payout percentage as the right number, but how do you guys have to think about matching that close to your NOI?

Yes. So I'd say it's a great question. So this is a subject of a lot of discussion with our shareholders and our Board. I think -- listen, we have a very, very strong dividend coverage. We also have one of the highest dividend yields at NAV and at market in the space. So we're at the very high end of -- we're at a pretty high end of our payout already. And it just goes to -- like, our ROEs are obviously pretty strong. So listen, I think there's a lot of uncertainty out there between everything going on. And so we want to make sure whatever we raise our dividend to, we feel really good about. But to the extent that these earnings tailwinds continue and to the extent that our credit quality is stable, which so far it is, I wouldn't be surprised for us to continue to increase the dividend. I don't think you're going to see us -- the other new phenomenon out there across corporate America is a variable dividend. And I don't think you're going to see us pursue that policy. And then in terms of -- the other thing that benefited us is when we did a lot of these merger transactions, there's a lot of tax benefits to doing that. So we're very -- we're in actually pretty good shape on a spillover income perspective. So unlike a normal BDC, who is static in nature, we have a lot more flexibility in our dividend policy just due to the -- these tax benefits we picked up in some of these deals.

We have a question from the line of Steven Martin with Slater.

Can you hear me?

Yes, yes.

Okay. A follow-up to Ryan's question. Given your level of core NII and given -- I'm looking at Slide 5. Forgetting spillover for a second, you see your spread of dividend to NII is actually sort of decreasing. And so your spillover is therefore increasing every quarter. And if the 2021 sort of model is any example, you're going to continue at that level. Do you think -- and I know it's a subject of a lot of discussion. But do you think increasing $0.01 a quarter is going to narrow that capital?

Yes. I mean I think increasing it by once in a quarter clearly narrows the gap. As I said earlier, I mean, we disclosed our spillover income. We're in decent shape there, but that will begin to build, obviously, over the next 4 to 8 quarters. So this is something that's going to be a subject of discussion every quarter. And we just want to make sure that whatever we raise our dividend to, we can sustain it for a very long period of time through all cycles. So as you said, we do have a decent amount of cushion now between core earnings and our dividend. But unlike most BDCs, because we picked up a lot of tax -- one thing that I don't think was apparent to a lot of people when we did these mergers is we did pick up a lot of tax benefits from our shareholders, which have real value. And so again, from a spillover perspective, that will definitely build over the next couple of quarters. And so you can imagine that we're talking about this quite a lot about where to ultimately settle out our dividend policy vis-a-vis core earnings.

Okay. I might --

I'd also say the reason we're giving you a wishy washy answer is because obviously, over the last 2 years, we've had a lot of, I would say, nonrecurring expenses in terms of M&A fees, lawyers fees. And then layer on top of that, where we're really trying to drive a lot of costs out through refinancing debt. We did switch certain professionals to get costs down. We've done some stuff on the administration side to get it down. So I think -- we feel like our core earnings are our core earnings. And there are some tailwinds to our earnings, particularly if rates go up more than a couple of Fed rate hikes. And LIBOR as of now is at 80 basis points. It was 30 like couple of weeks ago. So all that's good for us, hopefully, over a long period of time.

All right. If I can refer to Slide 10 for a second, equity securities jumped in Q2, obviously merger-related. It seemed to be relatively flat the last couple of quarters. With all the refinancings, M&A activity, et cetera, I would have expected -- unless you're investing in new equity securities, I would have expected maybe some of that to run off or get refinanced out.

Yes. We're not -- as in general, we're not investing in new equity-only securities. So there are some instances where we're making an investment and we're getting penny warrants or something like that as kind of part of the transaction. So there are some kind of “new equity securities”, but obviously, it's a corollary with the debt investment we're making. We do have a couple of equity positions in the book that have appreciated in value over the last couple of quarters that BC has invested in. So there's kind of some offset of some of these legacy equity positions kind of being refinanced out or taken out and then -- and increasing in fair value of some of the positions that we put on over the last, call it, 2.5 years.

But I guess do you -- is there -- sort of on the horizon, should we expect that -- it's $22 million, should we expect that maybe some of that gets refinanced and converted into interest-bearing securities? Or do we expect that to be relatively static?

Yes. I think as a general rule, it should be decreasing a little bit but not significantly. I mean if you look at our SOI, it's a lot of cats and dogs in terms of line items. So there's not any -- I think our largest equity position is maybe $5 million. And that's actually a preferred equity position that is generating income for us. That is a cash paying security. So I'd say as a general rule of thumb, again, they're all -- it's just a lot of relatively small positions. So we would love to reduce that over time and move that into interest-bearing securities. But the reality is there's not like a meaningful needle mover in that group.

All right. You commented on your leverage ratio. It sort of slipped a little this quarter, you didn't invest as much as you got repaid. Was that a conscious decision? Or was that just a function of what was available to you and what got repaid?

Yes, honestly, it was a bit of a function of year-end activity. So kind of heading into December, we had a number of planned investment activity drew a little bit on the revolver, kind of we're ready for a couple of deals, we had 2 or 3 deals that got pushed. And then at the end of the year, we had a bunch of repayment activity that obviously wasn't necessarily anticipated. So between a combination of those things, we kind of drew on our facility, expecting to need the capital. And at the end of the day, we had kind of way more repayments towards the very end. And so I would think of that as more of a minor blip from a timing perspective and anything that was very intentional on our part to take up leverage.

Well, then did I miss? Was there a disclosure that I didn't see on what's beyond quarter-to-date activity?

I think I had mentioned it in our -- in my script. I think we had purchased $108 million of securities, and I think we exited $78 million of securities, give or take. Those are kind of new deals. So if we fund an existing commitment that kind of doesn't get counted in there. And if we -- and if we just kind of regular course repayment activity doesn't necessarily get counted in that, but I'd say as a general rule of thumb, we were kind of -- we put out more money than we brought in.

Okay. And 1 last question. And maybe -- again, I got on a couple of minutes late. Did you comment anything on your portfolio companies' exposure to Russia, Ukraine, Belarus?

Yes. We didn't -- I mean I was thinking the same thing. So we have no direct exposure to any of the recent volatility. And we have very, very limited indirect exposure. So we don't have any energy companies or anything else. The one thing we are watching is for like third derivative effects, so things like rising input costs and other factors. But as of now, we have not seen any material impact on our portfolio.

Okay. And one last one on the share repurchase. You said your plan has expired. Is the intention to be opportunistic? Or is the intention to put a new plan in place?

Yes. Sorry, so a couple of things to clarify there. The Board just reapproved our extension or a new repurchase program that will extend through the year 2022, expiring March 2023. When I referred to plan expiring, it was just a brokerage agreement with the broker, and we just need to reestablish that.

Those are old 10b5 program expired, and we would look to implement a new one at some point.

Yes. Yes, exactly.

That's what I was referring to. And that might -- especially if you're not in a prospective proxy situation, maybe you'll be able to actually buy some shares.

Exactly. And we are eager…

Hopefully.

…to exit this blackout window.

That concludes today's question-and-answer session. I'd like to turn the call back to Ted Goldthorpe for closing remarks.

Great. Well, thank you very much for joining us today, and thank you for all your support. And we look forward to speaking to you guys in a couple of weeks when we report our first quarter earnings. Thank you very much.

This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.