Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Portman Ridge Finance Corporation Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2020 Financial Results Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speakers' presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference to your speaker today, Jeehae Linford. Please go ahead, ma'am.

Thank you. Good morning, and welcome to Portman Ridge Finance Corporation's fourth quarter and full year 2020 earnings conference call. An earnings press release was distributed yesterday, March 11, after market closed. A copy of the release, along with an earnings presentation is available on the Company's website at www.portmanridge.com in the Investor Relations section and should be reviewed in conjunction with the Company's Form 10-K filed yesterday with the SEC.

Thank you. Welcome, and good morning. Thank you for joining us today, and we hope everyone is healthy and doing well. I'm joined this morning by our Chief Financial Officer, Jason Roos; and our Chief Investment Officer, Patrick Schafer. For those of you who are new to Portman Ridge, our investment strategy is to focus on direct origination of senior secured debt investments to the middle market. We are affiliated with BC Partners, a leading global alternative asset manager with more than $40 billion of assets under management and over 30 years of operating history in the U.S. BC Partners credit was launched in February of 2017, and has pursued a strategy focused on identifying attractive opportunities in any market environment across sectors and across sectors by leveraging the deal sourcing and infrastructure made available to us by BC partners. Yesterday afternoon, Portman Ridge announced its fourth quarter and full year 2020 fiscal year financial results. We had an active and successful year in 2020, and we are very pleased with the progress we've made in managing and growing Portman Ridge. I'll focus my remarks today on three areas: first, an update on our M&A activity in general; second, an overview of our quarterly and full year results; and finally, our perspective of current market conditions, including our general outlook for the first quarter of 2021. Following that, Jason will provide additional detail on our portfolio -- on our financial results, and Patrick will do the same on the investment portfolio. On October 28, we closed our merger with Garrison Capital. This transaction, which has been the largest merger we've executed to date, essentially doubled our asset base as we've discussed in previous conference calls, it is expected to result in a number of benefits to Portman Ridge shareholders.

Great. Thanks, Ted, and good morning, everyone. I'm very happy to have joined the team, especially during such a dynamic time in the Company's development. I look forward to getting better acquainted with all of you soon. I will now recap the financial results and our financial position for the fourth quarter and full year 2020. Given the Garrison merger, I wanted to take a moment to describe the impact of merger accounting to our financial statements this quarter. Under GAAP, the merger was accounted for as an asset acquisition, whereby the value of the consideration paid for the assets that Garrison resulted in a purchase price discount in the amount of approximately $40 million. This discount is a function of the accounting and setting the value of consideration paid based in part on the Portman Ridge share price at the closing date of the acquisition. The total value of consideration paid is used to set the new cost basis and the assets acquired by allocating the value to each asset based on the relative fair value of the assets acquired upon the closing date of the transaction. This purchase price discount resulted in a onetime unrealized gain as those acquired assets were marked to their fair values immediately upon close, which is a noncash event. This discount will accrete in the net investment income over the remaining lives of the debt instruments and will be accelerated through any sales or pay downs that may occur. The discount allocated to equity instruments will be recognized in net investment income only upon a realization event, such as a sale transaction. This will not have an impact on our NAV per share. GAAP net investment income for fourth quarter was $8.9 million or $0.14 per share, which put our full year net…

Thanks, Jason. The fourth quarter was relatively quiet for us in terms of new investment activity, given the merger with Garrison and our intention is to de-risk the balance sheet following closing. During the quarter, we made investments into six borrowers, one of which was the BCP Great Lakes joint venture and five of which were brand-new borrowers, all of which were completed alongside other BC Partners entities. In aggregate, these six investments totaled $24.2 million of face value, 88% of which were first-lien securities and the remaining 12% being net add on to the Great Lakes joint venture. The weighted average spread on the new investments, excluding the Great Lakes joint venture, was 648 basis points. As to be expected, given both the Garrison merger and overall improvement in the capital markets, we are very active during the quarter with dispositions. In total, we exited or were repaid on 45 positions, three of which were proactive sales of legacy Garrison assets. In aggregate, these exits represented a carrying value of $135.4 million and resulted in a gain of approximately $1.1 million. Specifically related to the proactive Garrison asset sales, these 30 positions represented an aggregate carrying value of $92.4 million and resulted in a gain of approximately $0.6 million. Excluding the impact of the Garrison merger and associated purchase price accounting as well as the reversal of previously unrecognized income on Rasco Medical, our debt and equity securities accounted for an approximately $2.1 million unrealized gain, while sale equity positions accounted for a $1.2 million unrealized gain and our two joint ventures accounted for the remaining $2.6 million of unrealized gains. On an equivalent basis, as of December 31, Portman Ridge had $437.7 million of debt securities marked at 92.4% of par and yielding a stated spread to LIBOR of 679 basis points on accruing debt securities. This compares to $226.2 million of debt securities marked at 90.4% of par and yielding a stated spread to LIBOR of 715 basis points on accruing debt securities as of September 30, 2020, and $165.7 million of debt securities portfolio marked at a blended price of 91.9% of par and stated spread to LIBOR of 658 basis points when Sierra Crest took over management of the Portman Ridge on April 1, 2019. Turning to Slide 12. Nonaccruals, as of December 31, 2020, represented 2.4% of cost and 0.8% of fair value on the investment portfolio as compared to 3.2% and 1.2%, respectively, as of September 30. Eight investments were on non-accrual status as of December 31, 2020. With that, I'll turn the call back over to Ted Goldthorpe.

Thank you, Patrick. In closing, I wanted to again state how pleased we are with the progress we've made with Portman Ridge. We believe we're off to a strong start in 2021 and are optimistic for a more normalized operating conditions through the rest of the year. Looking ahead, we are working towards hopefully another successful closing with the Harvest Capital merger, and we expect to continue our work on portfolio integration and rotation as well. Our transactions to date have brought about significant changes to the Portman Ridge profile in terms of size, capital structure and portfolio composition over these many months. In the long run; however, our ultimate goal remains steadfast, which to deliver strong and sustainable risk-adjusted returns to shareholders. We believe the successful execution of these transactions are key to achieving this goal. I'd like to thank all of our shareholders for your ongoing support and confidence in us, and I'd now like to turn it over to the operator for any questions.

Thank you. Our first question comes from Ryan Lynch with KBW. Your line is now open.

First one I had was related to Slide number 5. You guys accelerated, I would say, the pace of exiting some of the legacy Garrison investments in the quarter. I assume part of that was driven by kind of the elevated leverage range, but now that you all are in kind of your targeted leverage range today, should we expect the pace of that rotation out of those Garrison assets to slow down meaningfully?

Yes, I mean, that's a great question. I'll turn it over to Patrick, but what I would say is, we really spent a lot of time before these transaction closes, lining up asset sales. And so, as you recall, we did 40% of OHAI in the first couple of weeks, and same with Garrison. We just didn't feel comfortable with the leverage range, but we would expect to see elevated repayments and reductions in the Garrison portfolio, but nothing like we saw in the fourth quarter. I mean, we were very, very proactive about monetizing a big chunk of the book. And I don't think you're going to see that pace continue.

Yes. Just to add on that. I think that's right, Ted. And you think I would note on the Garrison portfolio is one, it tends to be a little bit more liquid still even than the legacy -- our legacy portfolio. So as we think about optimizing our risk-return within the portfolio, theoretically, those Garrison assets might be a higher priority in terms of asset sales. And then number two, the Garrison portfolio, generally speaking, is a little bit more mature than the Portman Ridge just given that BC partners has been originating assets over the last several years. So, it would be likely to expect that the Garrison portfolio would be subject to greater repayments just in the ordinary course, but I don't think it would be anything intentionally strategic on our part.

Okay. Understood. And then congratulations on the investment-grade rating from Egan-Jones, number one. And then on that point, longer term, I know it may look a little bit I may be a little bit transitional with the Harvest merger coming up. But longer term, what sort of composition do you think is ideal for your liability structure in terms of unsecured debt credit facility debt? And then I know there are pieces of debt like you guys currently have a securitization, which I think is probably going to be winding down, especially with the repayment. But just longer term, what do you see is the ideal fit for the composition of your liability structure?

Yes. So, great question, Brian. I think we're still sorting out a little bit -- this is Patrick, by the way. I think going forward, even in the long term, unsecured bonds will remain a very integral part of our financing strategy, given the flexibility that they provide. I think bigger picture, we would probably look ultimately to consolidate our revolving facility as well as the CLO liabilities in the longer term. So, we still have a fairly long reinvestment period on that CLO. So there's nothing imminent on the horizon there or that we would need to do. But I do think that's probably the area where we would look to try and consolidate from the liability side.

Okay. And the only thing I'd add is we do have a number of near-term maturities coming up on the bond side, and we also have near-term maturities on -- pro forma for the Harvest transaction, there's also some near-term maturities. So, this is something we're very focused on given where unsecured debt is pricing these days, we think we can realize significant savings for our shareholders, and it all drops to the bottom line. So, we've been hurt obviously by reductions in LIBOR, the last or rates in the last 12 to 18 months. So, there's no reason why we shouldn't benefit it from as well by locking in cheaper liabilities as well.

Okay. And then just one last one for me. How active are you guys in the market as far as deploying new capital into new portfolio companies? Obviously, you guys have been very active on the M&A front. Deal flow was basically shut off for several quarters there in the spring and summer months. But now that, that market is picking back up. How active should we expect you as far as deploying new capital, given all the M&A that you guys have going on in the background?

Yes. I mean our primary -- I mean, we have never seen the level of deal activity that we saw in the fourth quarter of last year, and we expect this year to be very robust as well. There's a lot private equity activity. Most of our activity that we're seeing now is on the sponsor side. Their non-sponsor businesses continue to be consistent, I would say. But on the sponsor side, a lot of pressure on private equity firms to return capital to their investors. So, a lot of portfolio companies up for sale, a lot of excited processes. And so yes, I mean, the deal environment was very robust in the fourth quarter, and we've kind of seen it spill over into this year. So, we'll see what happens. I wouldn't be surprised if it slowed down in the next couple of quarters, but it still continues to be very active. From our perspective, we're kind of lucky. We came into this year very invested and the benefit of that is, I think you're going to see -- I don't think you're going to see us massively increase our net investment activity, but our gross investment activity you'll see has picked up a lot. So, a lot of our, I would say, weaker credits were proactively trying to get refinanced out of and replace them with what we would view as higher quality credits at similar spreads. So I think we've done a really good job the last three months, probably faster than we expected, what I would call hydrating our portfolio. Like we think we've taken a lot of risk out of our portfolio while maintaining spreads. And so, I don't think you're going to see -- we're at a pretty elevated leverage level now, I mean, we're at we're within our range, but I don't think we want to go up that much. So, I think you're going to see high gross loan that was the way I phrase it. Patrick, do you want to add anything to that or?

No. I think the one thing I would add is BC Partners as a platform has remained very active. So while Portman as an entity has been relatively muted, given the M&A activity, our platform is still very much active and involved in the market, which makes it relatively easy to get Portman back in. So, we're still maintaining our dialogues within our sponsor relationships and intermediaries and things like that. So that's just the one thing I would add.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Christopher Nolan with Ladenburg Thalmann. Your line is now open.

Ted, is it correct -- following up Ryan's question that for 2021, you expect mostly improved economics from Portman Ridge to be from the restructuring of liabilities?

Yes. I mean, we would expect to see savings to our shareholders from the various things we're going to do on the liability side over the course of the next couple of quarters.

Great. And I guess as a follow-up on Rosco Medical, just that was cured and that's back of accruing?

Yes, that's correct. It started paying cash as of September month that is paying monthly cash interest. There was a bit of a timing mismatch around the accrued interest that ultimately got capitalized as part of a renegotiation in October, so kind of led over from Q3 into Q4. But yes, as of September month, it's accruing and paying cash interest.

Final question on operating expenses. Any sort of guidance you can give, Jason, in terms of what we should expect in terms of quarterly run rates for operating expenses?

Yes. Sure. Yes. So you'll see Q4 is a little bit higher than normal across the downgrading expense profile in part because of the professional fees. There as an upside uptick in that space, given that Q3 was a little bit undersized given some positive negotiations we had with vendor pricing in Q3. So it's a little bit higher of an uptick there because of that. But I would expect once the M&A starts to stabilize a little bit, that number will start to come down on a run rate basis. The admin services, you'll see that ticked up a bit as well as the other G&A, in part because of, I would say, one-time expenses popping up because of the M&A activity associated with Garrison And just to give a little color on that, I would expect to see about 25% to 30% of that come off of that increase going forward.

I'm not showing any further questions at this time. I would now like to turn the call back over to Ted Goldthorpe for closing remarks.

Again, we'd like to thank everybody for dialing in this morning, and we would like to thank our shareholders for their continuing support. And we wish everybody remains healthy and safe. And if you have any questions at all, call any member of management at any time. Thank you very much.

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.