Good morning. Welcome to Brunswick Corporation’s Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2023 Earnings Conference Call. All participants will be in a listen-only mode until the question-and-answer period. Today’s meeting will be recorded. If you have any objections, you may disconnect at this time. I would now like to introduce Neha Clark, Senior Vice President, Enterprise Finance Brunswick Corporation. You may begin.

Good morning and thank you for joining us. With me on the call this morning are Dave Foulkes, Brunswick’s CEO; and Ryan Gwillim, CFO. Before we begin with our prepared remarks, I would like to remind everyone that during this call, our comments will include certain forward-looking statements about future results. Please keep in mind that our actual results could differ materially from these expectations. For details on these factors to consider, please refer to our recent SEC filings and today’s press release. All of these documents are available on our website at brunswick.com. During our presentation, we will be referring to certain non-GAAP financial information. Reconciliations of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures are provided in the appendix to this presentation and the reconciliation sections of the unaudited consolidated financial statements accompanying today’s results. I will now turn the call over to Dave.

Thanks, Neha, and good morning, everyone. Brunswick delivered another successful year in which we achieved the second highest sales and adjusted earnings per share in company history, despite market headwinds. We also continued to gain market share, increase our operational efficiency, launch exceptional new products, actively control costs and progress our strategic initiatives, including our ACES strategy. Our full year net sales of $6.4 billion and adjusted earnings per share of $8.80 were slightly below our guidance range as wholesale customer ordering patterns softened late in the year. However, our diligent focus on cash generation resulted in outstanding free cash flow of $473 million and full year free cash flow conversion of 76%. In addition, we executed $275 million of share repurchases. Mercury Marine has continued to capture solid market share, with full year U.S. outboard retail share up 50 basis points versus prior year. 2023 U.S. new boat market unit retail sales are anticipated to finish in line with our estimates of down mid‐to-high single digits with Brunswick brands outperforming the market in many segments. As we moved out of the core 2023 retail selling season, we worked closely with our marine channel partners to actively manage boat field inventory levels. We closed the year with 36.7 weeks on hand in the U.S., which is in line with our target and with historical norms. I will now turn to some of the segment highlights for the quarter and full year. Our Propulsion business finished its second best year on record, leveraging more exciting new products, market share gains and operational efficiencies to deliver consistent year‐over‐year operating margins, despite slightly lower sales and earnings versus the historical highs in 2022. For the full year, Mercury gained 150 basis points of overall U.S. retail share for outboard engines over 30 horsepower,…

Thanks Dave, and good morning, everyone. Brunswick delivered a solid fourth quarter despite softer wholesale demand across our businesses. When compared to an extremely strong fourth quarter of 2022, net sales in the quarter were down 14% and adjusted EPS of $1.45 decreased 27%. However, we delivered a record Q4 free cash flow of $242 million, a 25% increase over prior year, as we continue to focus the enterprise on generating cash and minimizing working capital usage. Sales were below prior year as the impact of cautious wholesale ordering patterns by dealers, OEMs and retailers, coupled with higher discounts in select segments, was only partially offset by successful new product momentum, positive mix and pricing implemented in previous quarters. Operating earnings and margin declined versus a record fourth quarter 2022 resulting from the impact of lower net sales and prudent spending on growth initiatives, partially offset by ongoing cost containment efforts. For the full year, we delivered the second highest sales and adjusted EPS in Brunswick’s history, just behind our 2022 performance. Our strong free cash flow of $473 million, resulting in second half free cash flow conversion of 143%, again reflecting our continued focus on driving cash in this challenging market. Now we’ll look at each reporting segment, starting with our Propulsion business. Revenue was down 12% versus the fourth quarter of 2022 primarily due to cautious OEM ordering patterns, partially offset by continued market share gains in outboard engines and the acquisition of Fliteboard completed earlier in the year. Operating margins increased by 110 basis points versus Q4 2022 as the impact of the sales declines and higher labor inflation costs were more than offset by cost control and reduced material inflation. As Dave mentioned earlier, as we exit 2023 and enter 2024, we anticipate that we will…

Thanks, Ryan. With field inventory at normalized levels and consumers having their choice of products, it is vital that Brunswick continues to differentiate through a rapid flow of exciting new products and technology, and in just the first few weeks of 2024, Brunswick launched over 15 new products across its brands and businesses. In January, we again participated in the Consumer Electronics Show where we launched two higher horsepower models in the Mercury Marine Avator electric outboard line up, which now contains five models in total. Demand for Avator remains solid, with nearly 60% of shipments in 2023 going to Europe. Sea Ray introduced the new SDX 270 and 270 Surf models with next‐generation features, styling and comfort. The SDX Surf is the first model in the SDX line to feature the Mercury Bravo Four S forward‐facing drive and an intuitive wake surfing control system designed jointly by Mercury Marine and Navico Group. Brunswick’s Princecraft, Harris and Lowe brands also introduced multiple new products at early season shows, featuring Mercury Marine and Navico Group technology. We are also very excited about the new, segment leading Simrad NSX Ultrawide, the industry’s first full functionality high definition, multi‐function display, which features a 16 by 9 screen aspect ratio and showcases the seamless interface of the latest Simrad Android operating system. And finally, Freedom Boat Club continues to grow organically and through acquisition, including though the acquisitions of its Savannah and Hilton Head franchise territories in late 2023 and two new franchise locations in Spain already announced in 2024. Before we conclude, I am thrilled to highlight the exceptional accomplishments of our teams from across the enterprise that were recognized with a record high number of awards in 2023 and continue to be recognized in early 2024. We wrapped 2023 with 115 major awards for our products, technology, people and culture. And just in early 2024, the new Harris 250 Crowne won the NMMA Innovation Award at the Minneapolis Boat Show, the new Sea Ray 260 SLX won European Powerboat of Year and the Veer V13 won Boating Magazine Boat of the Year in its category. In addition, Brunswick’s products and teams are nominated for multiple awards at the upcoming Miami Boat Show. Thank you again to all our talented Brunswick employees who make these prestigious awards possible. Which leads me to remind you to join us at our Investor and Analyst Event on February 15, 2024, at the Miami International Boat Show, where we look forward to hosting you to see the latest products and technologies from across our brands and businesses, as well as meet with members of our management team. Thank you for joining the call. That concludes our prepared remarks. We will now open the line for questions.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our first question is from Matthew Boss with JPMorgan. Please proceed.

Thanks. So, Dave, maybe could you help rank the topline drivers by segment and just visibility today to improvement as the year progresses? If we could just bridge the delta between the more than 20% decline expected in the first quarter to the full year guide of down mid-single digits, I think, that would be really helpful?

Yeah. Hi, Matthew. Yeah. The -- I think the fact is really similar across all of our businesses to some extent and it’s really the fact that, we saw in particularly the December of the fourth quarter reduced demand from marine OEMs and more production shutdowns, which had an impact on our Mercury wholesale orders and Navico Group wholesale orders, as well as of course, we reduced production to meet our year-end targets for boat inventory and get to that 37 fish weeks on hand. So the fourth -- the first quarter we anticipate continued cautious ordering across wholesale by Mercury’s OEM customers, which is about kind of 80% of their sales and Navico Group’s OEM customer -- marine customers, which is about 30% of their sales, and we obviously will be continuing to be to meet our own boat production during that period. What we anticipate based on early season retail, confirmed I think by early season retail now, is that orders will begin to pick up to more normalized levels as we enter the main selling season. In Q1, as we get to the end of Q1, we’re seeing new boat retail going to bump about 10% versus last year, which is an encouraging sign. So I would say that the factors really affect all of our divisions somewhat similarly and it is the production and wholesale ordering getting back to more normalized levels for Q2 forward.

And Matthew, good morning. It’s Ryan. Just a reminder, Q1 of 2023, we were very much still filling pipelines in just about all engine categories and even boats, if you remember. So it is a more challenging comparison. And I would -- if you’re modeling it out, the first quarter of 2024 should look relatively similar to the fourth quarter of 2023, as Dave mentioned.

Great. And then maybe just to follow up, Ryan, as we consider the, I think, it’s roughly 12% operating margin at the lower end of this year’s guide as maybe a potential floor. Could you just elaborate on the $40 million structural cost savings that you cited in your remarks, where in the organization that you found efficiencies and are there further opportunities that you see for potentially additional savings?

Yeah. Matthew, I mean, it is -- this is a cross enterprise project that we’re undertaking. And frankly, it’s just to right size the overall cost structure of the enterprise. If you think about where our strategic plan and our targets are, we’re still very confident in those. But getting there to 2027 is going to take a little bit, the shape of that is kind of unfolding as we’d expect, which is 2024 being a little bit more muted and then picking back up in the out years. We just need to make sure that our cost structure matches that same shape.

Those actions are in flight actions.

Yeah.

If we need to find more, we always find a way.

That’s right.

Our next question is from James Hardiman with Citi. Please proceed.

Hey. Good morning. Thanks for taking my call. So I want to talk about inventory. You guys have said that you feel pretty good about where you sit today. Seems like a lot of other players in the industry are speaking to inventories being too high. I guess, what do you think the difference is there? Do you think you’ve controlled your own inventories better than maybe some other OEMs? It doesn’t matter if that’s the case, if you’re ultimately competing with those that haven’t, and I guess, how do we think about inventory to finish 2024, whether in terms of units or weeks on hand?

Yeah. Hi, James. Thank you for the question. Yeah. We did see a lot of commentary about other OEMs noting higher than design inventory levels. We are very comfortable with our inventory levels. I think we explained that we had put a lot of effort into managing inventory in the back half of the year. We did see some relatively abrupt changes in production patterns in December from some of Mercury’s OEM customers. Our production did not change as abruptly because we began to, I think, be tricked down somewhat earlier. And yeah, honestly, despite the commentary, yeah, we feel extremely good about our inventory levels. Does it matter what the industry does? Well, it makes it more difficult for us to predict Mercury and Navico Group wholesale sales, because we tend to experience more choppy ordering patterns in the back half of Q4 and we may be the same in the first half of Q1. But I feel like based on our retail performance in January, which you know is a very small month, but still somewhat encouraging, I don’t think we’re suffering. I think we have the right level of retail incentives, dealer incentives to stimulate demand and I think we have the right inventory levels. So I’m very comfortable where we are.

And then the last part of your question was, how do you think you’ll end 2024? Well, the plan is to have inventory levels below 2023 end of year levels by the end of this year. Not dramatically, but down a handful of weeks on hand. If retail continues to be a little bit outpacing maybe our expectations, then we can maneuver that a little bit. But right now, the plan would be a few weeks on hand lower at the end of 2024 than 2023.

Got it. Really helpful. And then as we sort of contemplate this 2024 guidance, it sits somewhere between when you gave us the recession scenarios, sort of the modest and the severe recession, despite not being in a recession and I don’t point that out to sort of knock your projections two years ago. But I guess maybe speak to what the divergence is, I guess, as it occurs to me, back then we weren’t necessarily thinking that the macro weakness would be as interest rate driven as it appears to have been. Maybe speak to that. And I guess what I’m really trying to figure out is, if rates in fact do come down starting this year, is there an opportunity for a snapback maybe more quickly than we would otherwise see in previous sort of post-recession scenarios?

Yeah. James, maybe I’ll start with that and then Dave can fill in. Yeah. The -- it’s always interesting when you come out with a downside scenario, you got to live with it kind of in perpetuity. But we knew that we would get this question obviously on the call this morning. The difference really is kind of two things. One’s the starting point. If you remember, this was a one-year scenario that we came out with in 2022 at a time where we were coming off a kind of a $10 EPS number or had a $10 budget, excuse me, for 2022 EPS and we were anticipating what would happen if the world dropped off in one year. That year also had some pipeline fill in it where Boat Group, although the retail sales would drop off, I think, we said 30% or 35%, that retail, that the wholesale would actually hold in a little better. This, as we said today, the real difference is two, one, there is no pipeline refill remaining in boats or engines. But two, really the P&A businesses as a whole, they haven’t performed any different than we anticipated, but they have performed a little different from a starting point. If you remember, really peak P&A season was end of 2021 and into 2022. And despite still having a CAGR of kind of 8%, 9% over the last five years, that business has come off a little bit from a high, really those two years that we gave the downside scenario. So if you take the midpoint of our range kind of at $7.50 [ph], you probably got a little bit of goodness on propulsion, a little trailing on P&A. Shares are obviously a good guy, because we’ve been buying back a little more. And then the last thing I’d say was an investment really in the ACES, in all of our ACES categories that has driven about maybe $0.40, $0.50 of cost, but we’re obviously happy to do that. So that’s really the difference.

Our next question is from Mike Swartz with Truist Securities. Please proceed.

Hey, guys. Just wanted to touch on the Propulsion guidance, and more specifically, just the margin assumptions. It looks like you are kind of embedding in that guidance about 16% margins, which is a step down of about 200 basis points. From the commentary you provided on the call, it sounds like mix, both product mix and channel mix should be positives. Just help us walk through how you get to that 200 basis point decline.

Hey. Good morning, Mike. Yeah. Again, this is one that we kind of knew would get folks attention. It really starts with absorption just due to lower volume. If you look on the EPS bridge, you noted the pipeline, the lack of pipeline fill being a big driver on EPS and a chunk of that is obviously volume and sales related, but that also hurts absorption in the facility, certainly in the Fond du Lac facility with lower volume. So absorption is certainly the number one. Tariffs is number two, about $15 million more of tariffs and that just goes right to COGS. And we’re doing our best to offset it by doing other things and where we do final assembly, but it’s still $15 million is hard to cover. And then, if we are in a position where input costs, material and labor are elevated a little bit over prior year, not a terrible amount, but our ability to price over that, although positive, so price, PNOC [ph] price over input cost is still positive. The spread there, the available price over input cost is not as large. So the goodness is not as large. Those three things are really the primary drivers and they’re really all in gross margin. I would note that as per usual, Mercury does a fantastic job of monitoring their cost structure and their OpEx is targeted to be relatively flat year-over-year and that’s inclusive of absorbing all the OpEx from Flite, which is the October acquisition, obviously, and a resetting of comp back to target levels.

Okay. That’s helpful. Thank you, Ryan. And maybe just a second question, as we think about the lower end of the earnings range and the higher end of the range, maybe walk us through maybe the big four or five factors driving that. How do you get to the top end? How do you get to the bottom end?

I think, Mike, just one addition to the previous point is that, the absorption issue really over-indexes towards Q1, because we don’t want to get rid of people, line operators in Q1 that we’re going to need in Q2. So there’s a kind of compounding effect in Q1 that will normalize through the other quarters in the year. In terms of top and bottom of the range, I think, bottom of the range would have to be further macro weakness than we anticipate. If retail sales hang in at roughly flat to last year, it’s difficult to see the bottom of the range. But we don’t need a lot of kind of market tailwind to get above the midpoint, really. I think our assumption of wholesale boat units, actually production going down this year in terms of being about 1,000 units below retail is probably a bit on the pessimistic side and then especially with the cost reductions that we will implement in any market scenario that we’ve already described, I think, that will help our leverage on particularly benefit EPS. So I would say downside would have to be additional macro risk of some kind. Upside is a bit better tailwind from the market.

Okay. Thank you.

Our next question is from Megan Alexander with Morgan Stanley. Please proceed.

Hi. Yeah. I don’t want to belabor it, but just did have a follow-up on that Propulsion margin answer if I could. Everything you said makes sense, but if I sit here and take kind of that $15 million tariff out, just to kind of look apples-to-apples versus last year, I’m still getting somewhere in the range of 45%-ish decremental margins. I think you’ve historically kind of talked about volume deleverage in the 20% to 30% range. So can you just maybe help us understand the discrepancy there, because it just seems pretty large.

Yeah. No. Megan, you’re right. The absorption hit is real. I mean, it’s a coming off of a first quarter and second quarter where we were running about as hard as we could in that facility and really into the third quarter and then scaling back to kind of normal production levels for this year. I mean, we’re taking, call it, a little bit more than 10% of production out of Fond du Lac here year-over-year. It becomes a more material piece of the puzzle. And as Dave said, don’t sleep a little bit on the input cost, and again, it’s a good story that PNOC is positive. But in past years, that spread would have been, it could have been $50 million, $60 million, $70 million and this year, it’s half of that. So the ability for us to price over some of the input cost inflation is a bit challenging. And lastly, I would just tell you, the guidance is, we are -- some of these are estimates. Obviously, if the world looks a little better. I think we all know that Mercury can outperform that margin guidance. But as we said today, I think, it’s a kind of middle of the road margin of where we think we can land the year.

Okay. That’s helpful. Thank you. And then maybe just another follow-up, would you be able to quantify maybe what the pipeline fill was last year and more of what’s just a hard compare in the first quarter versus what you’ve embedded in terms of what you’re seeing as it relates to the cautious wholesale ordering patterns, just particularly on Propulsion as we’re trying to get a sense for how to think about the cadence of that segment, in particular, beyond the first quarter?

Yeah. So if you think that whole step that production levels at Fond du Lac will be down kind of 10%-ish year-over-year, a lot of that is going to be in the first quarter and second quarter of the year. And most of that is kind of 75 horsepower to -- it’s below 300 horsepower, there’s really no shortage of 300 horsepower and above. So most of that 10% would be the first quarter and a little bit of the second.

Okay. I appreciate that. Thank you.

Our next question is from Craig Kennison with Baird. Please proceed.

Hey. Good morning. Thanks for taking my question. It’s been a helpful call as always. I guess I wanted to dig into Navico a bit. I think we’re coming on the three-year anniversary this summer of that transaction. And I guess, Dave, I’d be curious to get your take on, what has gone well and what has not gone so well?

Yeah. Thanks, Craig. Yeah. Coming up on the three-year anniversary. So I think what’s gone well is, I continue to believe that Navico is absolutely the right asset for us to own. There was nothing like it in the marketplace and there still isn’t anything like it in the marketplace. It plays very strongly to our move really from in a boat company to technology company. It really has some of the best technology assets in the business. And despite the fact that the financial performance is not what we’d originally anticipated at this time, I would say, there are several factors covering that that I’ll talk about in a second. It is actually doing well, extremely well, in a lot of those sub-segments of electronics. It continues to do well in producing unique solutions that nobody else can produce, like the Fathom system. We’re beginning to see a flow of new products that reflect our directions, like, the Ultrawide, which is, I mean, extraordinarily well-received and other things that will be coming out late in the year. So I think the asset is the right asset for us. We just bought it ahead of a market downturn. One of the things I guess is, if you think about Navico’s kind of mix, it’s about 30% marine OEM, 10% or 12% RV and specialty vehicles, and a little bit less than 60% aftermarket. I think what we did not foresee, a couple of things we didn’t foresee really, were the destocking that is experienced over the past several years, what we think is essentially troughed now and also the really severe decline in RV manufacturing that it continues to experience. So those are the things that we have had to combat. Now, I would tell you that, Navico was about 10% up in March of 2023. We expect that margin to expand in 2024, as the combination of new products takes hold and also as the full year effect of cost reductions take hold. So I would say, positives are strategic benefit and new products coming out. Some of the negatives are more associated with how the market has performed generally, including destocking in the past two or three years.

Yeah. Thank you. Dave, that’s very helpful. And if I could just drill down, like with Mercury, we can very clearly see your share gains show up in the industry data, but it’s less obvious for Navico whether you are getting a larger share of wallet from your OEM customers as you sort of integrate all of those solutions along the lines of your ACES strategy. So I’m just curious, is there a way to frame your share of wallet across the Navico portfolio?

Yeah. We have not broken that out, but since you asked the question, I think, we can look into whether we do that on a more systematic basis going forward. I can tell you that the Simrad brand has gained market share last year and continues to do extremely well and we imagine that only accelerating as the Ultrawide, which is unique in the marketplace, takes hold. Obviously, Craig, you’ll be at Miami, and hopefully, you’ll see a whole bunch of Fathom systems appearing and you could call that market share gain if you think about it as the number of OEMs for which we perform fully integrated services. But it’s a good question, and we will think about whether we can establish some KPIs that make it more easy to track.

Great. Hey. Thank you.

Our next question is from Xian Siew with BNP Paribas. Please proceed.

Hi, guys. Thanks for the question. I wanted to ask about the Engine P&A guidance. Looks like revenues are kind of expected to be flattish, but EBIT margin is up, I think, 150 bps. Could you maybe walk through some of the drivers there?

Yeah. Happy too. That is really a bit of a mixed story. We think that Distribution will still be a little bit sluggish, certainly in the first part of the year, but that our Products business, the higher margin Products business, will be up, as it has been really the last handful of quarters. So that -- remember, that’s a business that generally takes a point or two of price and generally the market is another one point or two points. We think that’s going to kind of play through on the Product side with Distribution trailing of this. The other item to remember is the Brownsburg transition in our facility, our new facility in Indianapolis or just outside, continues to go well. It’s been a bit of a harder lift in 2023 than anticipated, but the comp should be a little better going into 2024 and beyond.

Okay. Got it. Thanks. And then maybe in the 2024 guidance bridge, which is helpful, you also have $0.30 from other as a benefit. What is that exactly?

A lot of that is gross margin factors and there are -- I mean, there’s a kind of a laundry list of them that we didn’t want to make the slide any more busy than it was. But you can think of various COGS and other initiatives that we’re doing above the OpEx line that will help to offset some of the sales softness, certainly in the first half of the year.

Got it. So it’s like a gross margin. Okay.

Yeah. It’s mostly all, it’s a litany of gross margin goodness. A lot of them are programs that each of our divisions are doing to take costs out at the COGS level instead and also at the same time working on their OpEx.

Okay. Thank you guys. Good luck.

Our next question is from Fred Wightman with Wolfe Research. Please proceed.

Hey, guys. I wanted to come back to the engine refill comments and I’m a little bit surprised that you’re talking about not having as much of a pipeline opportunity there, just given some of the OEM backlog comments that you guys have made historically. And I know that you’ve stopped giving the OEMs who wanted to transition to Mercury power, but are you still seeing conversion for that backlog? Is that conversion more muted just given what’s going on with retail and wholesale? How does that sort of share opportunity stand on like a backlog go forward basis?

Yeah. So maybe I’ll start and Ryan could pick up. We did note share gain as, and clearly, part of that share gain is Mercury getting into more OEMs and getting more share of existing OEMs. There are a couple of notables coming across the line. I think you might see a few in Miami already. So we’re continuing to convert. I think so, if you look at the overall market, obviously, the way the market is behaving is affecting every OEM and that is somewhat reflected in the $1.50 that Ryan included at the start of the bridge. But the additional OEMs that we’re bringing on Board and we do continue to do that, and increased mix in others is reflected in that $0.50 of share opportunity.

Okay. If we could shift to the boat business, I mean, you guys just posted almost a 6% operating margin in a quarter where you were down over 20% in sales. And if we look historically, I think you guys would be really, really happy with the 6% margin agnostic of sales for up, down or sideways. So can you just sort of help us maybe give a state of the union for the downside margin performance of that? I mean, you’ve talked about getting back to double digits historically, understanding that it’s a tough wholesale environment today, but is that 6% a pretty good floor going forward?

Hey, Fred. I’ll take this and Dave can fill in. Yeah. I -- we are pretty happy. I mean, given that volume is down almost 20%, as you said, off of a Q4 2022 where we did hit that 10% operating margin, which I believe was the fourth out of five quarters we did it in a row. Yeah, we’re pretty happy with that fourth quarter performance. And that’s in an environment where we have a little bit extra discounting to spur retail, certainly in the start of the season. But it also reflects some really nice operational improvements really across all of our brands. The Boat Group’s done a great job of taking OpEx out and keeping it out. And so, yeah, I would say 6% is a pretty nice floor for a quarter where volume is where it was. I think you’ve seen the guidance for the full year and in a year where we’re still going to produce a little bit lower than we did in 2023, holding margins into that kind of 6%, 7%, 8% for the full year number is something that a handful of years ago would have been pretty darn impossible. So, the testaments of the operating jobs and all the businesses, but certainly the focus on taking OpEx out and keeping it out.

Perfect. Thanks a lot.

Our next question is from Scott Stember with ROTH MKM. Please proceed.

Good morning. Thanks for taking my questions as well.

Hey, Scott.

It sounds like you guys are looking for a flattish boat market this year. What are your assumptions as far as getting some help from interest rate reductions from the Fed?

Yeah. I think the interest rate reductions from the Fed and also other global central banks, given our presence in Europe particularly, but also in other markets, has two effects. One is directly impacts financing costs and the other is frees up kind of family budgets, discretionary spending more broadly, and maybe a tertiary effect is just consumer confidence. So, there are a number of kind of tailwinds that hopefully when that cycle begins will be introduced. I would say that, there is a lot of promotional financing around at the moment, including from us. But you will, if you go to the bookshelves or if you look online, you will see many companies offering promotional rates. So, I would say that, a lot of people are not paying, unless that credit rating is not high, they’re probably not paying the nominal rate, which at the moment has dropped about 50 basis points to about kind of 8.5%. I think probably more people are seeing 599, 699 [ph] rates. One of the things we are seeing though is, we continue to see a lot more cash buyers and even though the promotional interest rates pull people in, a lot of cases, the deal closes with people taking the cash and paying cash. So, I think, the primary effect will be there, but the secondary and tertiary effects of more discretionary income and consumer confidence are at least equally as important.

Got it. And then last question on the engine side, Repower. I guess one of the theories is, as you guys have more production capabilities and as the OEM side is falling back a little bit in a tougher economy, that boat owners would Repower their boats with some of your newer products. A, are you starting to see that yet, and B, could you just remind us of the margin dealt on an engine between Repower and OEM?

Hey, Scott. Yeah. I mean, Repower actually had a really nice second half and probably will have a pretty good first half. We actually gained 500 basis points of Repower share in the year, which is pretty big. But still, our Repower share trails our overall U.S. share. So, there’s still room to run there. We don’t talk exacts on margins, but the retail dealer margin certainly is stronger than OEM, just based on volume. So that is definitely a positive on the operating margin side, but we don’t comment on exactly how much that is. But yeah, very good Repower, not only in the U.S., but internationally as well.

Got it. That’s all for me. Thank you.

Thank you.

At this time, we would like to turn the call back over to Dave for some concluding remarks.

Thank you. Well, thank you all for joining us again and for the great questions. We really appreciate them. Despite the challenges, we again delivered a very strong year, the second best ever. You need to forget that, but we’re trying to make sure you don’t, which I think continues to demonstrate the resilience of our portfolio. Free cash flow generation was a particular highlight, I think, in the second half of the year and gives us additional flexibility as we go into 2024. As we noted a couple of times, OEM and dealer customers will likely continue to be cautious in their ordering through a portion of the first quarter. But we think we’ve equipped ourselves very well for the start of 2024. Pipelines are at appropriate levels. We have a wealth of new products. We have great digital properties. We have a well thought out mix of incentives. And we’re also, as Ryan mentioned a couple of times, continuing to control costs. I would say that we prefer a year this year of increasing guidance, and so we’re looking, it’s exciting, I think, that we’re off to a good start with retail. Boat show, we didn’t talk much about, but boat shows sales are maybe single digits down versus last year, but improving as we go through the year. Mix is significantly up into kind of 15% to 20% kind of mix up versus last year, which is very encouraging. So we could talk about all of those things and introduce you to our new products at our Investor and Analyst event in Miami on Feb 14th and we look forward to seeing you all there. Thank you.

Thank you. This will conclude today’s conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time and thank you for your participation.