Good day, ladies and gentlemen and welcome to the Halcón Resources Q3 2017 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a Q&A answer session and instructions will follow at that time. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Mr. Mark Mize, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer. Sir, you may begin.

Okay, thank you. Good morning. This conference call contains forward-looking statements. For a detailed description of our disclaimer, see our earnings release issued yesterday and posted on our website. We've also updated our investor presentation for the third quarter and certain other items, and you can access that presentation on our website. We'll start the call with a discussion of our financial performance during the third quarter as well as some thoughts on our 2018 guidance. I'll then turn the call over to Jon Wright, our COO, who'll make some comments about operations, and then Floyd will conclude the call. Production for the third quarter averaged 28,859 barrels of oil equivalent per day, comprised of 76% oil. This production included the contribution from our Williston Basin operated assets through September 7th, which is the date of the asset sale close, in addition to a contribution from our non-operated Williston Basin assets for the full quarter. Production for our Delaware Basin assets averaged 4,799 barrels of oil equivalent per day during the third quarter, consisting of about 70% oil. We expect production to average 15,000 to 19,000 Boe a day in 2018, which will be comprised of 72% to 78% oil. Our realized third quarter oil differential came in at 91% in NYMEX, and our third quarter natural gas differential came in at little over 50% in NYMEX. Looking forward to 2018, we expect differentials to be materially better now that we're a pure-play Delaware Basin company, with favorable midstream contracts. Therefore, we're guiding to differential of 97% for oil and 80% from natural gas in 2018. Our per unit operating costs were higher in the third quarter versus the second quarter, driven by the divested production associated with the Williston Basin asset, which did close in early September. As we…

Thank you, Mark. As for our recent company presentation, our 2018 development is focused on growth, delineation, determination of optimal spacing and fulfilling HBP requirements. To start with Monument Draw in Ward County. We plan to run two rigs continuously here through 2018, with 14 spuds and 16 wells put online. One rig will focus on pad development drilling in core areas, where we know we will get great results. Over the next six months, we'll put online a two-well pad, testing 660 spacing within Wolfcamp A formation; another three-well pad, where we will test Wolfcamp A and Third Bone Springs formations, with 660 spacing between Wolfcamp A wells and a 330 [Indiscernible] rack above in the Third Bone Springs. Both pads closely offset our CRMWD 79-1H well, which, in 180 days since POL, has cumulative production of 180,000 Boe. This is a 5,000-foot lateral with an EUR of 1.2 million barrels equivalent. The other rig in Monument Draw, we'll continue delineation drilling across the entire with acreage position, both north and south, more heavily weighted on our south area. We recently brought in a spot crew to this area. This frac crew this currently completing our second horizontal well in Monument Draw, Sealy Ranch 93 01H. This is a 10,000-foot Upper Wolfcamp well located on the Northern Option acreage in Monument Draw. We will have production results in a few weeks. It's a note that it's a direct offset to jagged peaks well in the area. After completing the 93 01H, the spot crew will vertical stage fracs on the pilot wells we drilled earlier this year in both the north and south areas of Monument Draw. We will test the second, Third Bone Spring and strong for production potential for future horizontal development. We plan to bring our…

Thanks Jon. So, look, as Mark mentioned, we're guiding to about 17,000 barrels for 2018, earning three rigs and spending $300 million. This is going to result in extremely strong growth. And the Q4 2017 versus Q4 2018 growth will be spectacular, and the exit rate will be quite healthy as well. We've given some directional ideas about other years future -- beyond 2018. You can see that on page six in the presentation that we just posted. Important to note, and intentionally, we put some metrics and measures about liquidity and balance sheet on the same page. So, while just using a very few rigs, our growth rate will be very strong. We're watching the progress on our balance sheet, and it looks, even though it's strong now, it strengthens throughout this. Again, that's on page six. Operating costs will be vastly improved over its [Indiscernible] levels, given our move to the Delaware. If you run our production and cost guidance through your models, you'll find that field-level and corporate-level returns are expected to be excellent next year. Again, financially, our balance sheet is in great shape, no and net debt and plenty of capital run our development drilling program to return cash flow positive in 2019. And expect to keep debt levels very low. Any improvements in crude prices might just hasten our drive to positive cash flow revenue than the catalyst and another rig. As we've shown, with just three rigs are preferably substantial and are sustainable. Our drilling plans, as Jon mentioned, are focused on developing great acreage position in certain lanes in the Wolfcamp and several zones in the Bone Springs. And both of our areas, Pecos and Ward. And will be accreting the data needed to make smart dispositions on spacing. We have a…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Jason Wangler from Imperial Capital. Sir, your line is now open.

Thanks. Good morning. Was curious, obviously, it sounds like you haven't fracked the vertical well in the Northern Monument dropped play. But was curious, as you look at that data versus, obviously, the success you've had further south, how that shapes out in terms of any details you've seen or even maybe how you look at the completion maybe as you go to that horizontal versus the one down south, thinking it's pretty successful.

Yes, Jason. We don't really talk too much about pilot wells. They are highly confidential, and they're totally exploratory as we step away from existing data points. And we can say that we have a significant development in several zones across the acreage up on the north end. We're testing zones that would not be our bread and butter zones in the vertical stack, in the vertical -- these vertical fracture what we're doing so we have the data point. We know that we'll be developing our usual suspects, if I will -- if we will, if we can call them that. So, a pilot well does -- is designed for data and help delineate things and then set the path for horizontal drilling and it's working great. We are drilling a pilot well down pretty far south as well. We're also getting ready to complete a few zones in the very first pilot well we drilled down in the Section 79. So, it's a really important data point for us and really intend to report more on actual horizontal results since the -- you don't typically make that real commercial play out of a vertical well in these types of zones. It's a great question, and they're filling their purpose. And they've shown the best that we have a lot of pay spread over the area.

No, that's fair enough. I appreciate the color. The only other one I was curious about, I think you mentioned in the release, there is some acreage holding requirements, I think, Hackberry Draw. Just curious, any color on that as far as how many wells or kind of what you're accomplishing next year as you go through that.

Jon?

Sure. As I mentioned, on Hackberry Draw, there will be -- we'll be spudding 18 wells this next year. There will be a mix of wells in our northern tier and our southern tier acreage.

Great. I'll turn it back. Thank you.

Our next question comes from the line of Asit Sen from Bank of America. Your line is now open.

Thanks. Good morning guys. So, I mean, the slide six looks great. And particularly, I wanted to probe a little bit into the annual production numbers through 2020. And it's very helpful for the analyst community. But wondering if you could provide us your basic assumptions on cost inflation efficiencies. Or are you factoring any change in completion designs? Just some basic assumptions.

Yes, listen, I'm going to get Quentin or Mark to address your -- the first part of that. But these numbers are directional in nature. They'll certainly get fine-tuned. And they appear our growth for our expectations of making our type curve wells, in general sense, with no improvements. And Quentin or Mark, could add to that about the first part of that question?

Yes. We're using our public D&C cost guidance to drive that. We're using 25 to 30 days drilled drilling time in Pecos and around 40 days in Ward. And those numbers, over the next couple of years, will decline, and we're modeling some decline as we become more efficient. But nothing extravagant. And it's a pretty conservative, high level type forecast that we used to create that slide.

Great. Very helpful. And then on comparing the Ward and Pecos, you've given us some EUR guidance broadly. But could you compare and contrast the two areas in terms of well cost, kind of thickness, depth, oil cut? Any early expectations that you can share with us?

Jon, I think that's a perfect thing for you to address. They are quite difference. One's more complex geologically. Go ahead, Jon.

Yes. Floyd mentioned our Ward County area is more complex geology. But -- and really, Pecos is fairly homogeneous. So, that's one way to look at both of those areas. Pecos County, we're getting some amazing drilling results, and that's included in our slide pack. We recently drilled a 10,000-foot lateral on 18.5 days from spud to TD, which is a pretty solid result. We expect to improve upon that. With those type of drilling results, you're going to see a lower cost structure in Pecos County, and that's noted in our deck as well. Both areas have outstanding EUR. Our expectations with our type curves in the results thus far show that. So, our south area of Ward County being about a 1.8 million-barrel type curve on a 10,000-foot lateral, very strong results there. But in Pecos County, we're seeing -- with our type curves and our well results with existing PDPs, 1.1 million to 1.3 million barrels. That's our expectations. I hope I covered everything.

Yes, great. Thanks. Appreciate the color.

So, listen, back to the first part of the question on that page six on the slide deck. That's future growth that we're projecting. This is using a very modest rig count. And we don't talk about growth as a one single subject. We talk about growth in fiscal health in the same breath, and we're trying to demonstrate how this presentation that we're focused on both of those equally. Growth isn't just a matter of putting a few rigs on this great rock. That's also just as important to us to be really strong. And in the future, if the crude markets give us other indications, we can change things. But we don't really talk about just growth anymore. I know that's about some smart people and all of that, but we talk about growth using a cautious approach to rig count. And we talk about it hand-in-hand with fiscal health.

Floyd, just following-up on that. What would it take for you, conceptually, to add a rig? Or are you completely ruling it out?

Of course, I wouldn't rule it out. You got to have a mid-60s price for a rig, under current cost estimations, to carry its own weight, if that helps, give you an answer.

That's perfect. Thanks.

So, our plan, as I mentioned at the tail end of my awesome little speech on this call, our plan was to self-operate -- raise enough money to enter the space and raise enough money in front to take care of the outspend that we anticipate and project and we've done that. So -- again, a mid-60s price with current cost, a rig will carry itself. Now, it carries itself over time. I'm just talking about that year, that first year. Over time, it's -- the return is awesome, but that first year, that's when you talk about liquidity and leverage.

Excellent. Thank you.

And our next question comes from the line of Mike Kelly from Seaport Global. Your line is now open.

Hey guys. Good morning. Appreciate the visibility through 2020 and which is provided on slide six. Just want to get your sense on the risk to achieving this growth and what you think are the potential operational impediments that you might encounter here and just the biggest risk, especially in these numbers.

I'll ask Jon to add to this. But we didn't get real -- try to be real cute. We gave some numbers here. We thought it would be more appropriate to give a range. But these are directional in nature, so you could bracket these with a range, several thousand barrels on either side of those numbers. Operationally, we see no risk to getting -- I mean, we have the rigs, we know we have the frac crew, we know we have the technology. And if you think that, we have nearly 2,000 locations already identified and we're tooling between, what is it, is it 20 or 25 wells a year out here, depending on where the rigs are going to be, you're scratching the surface of our inventory. So risk, we don't deal a lot of risk to reaching these. Also have a train wreck on a well that happens to us sometimes and others. And the bad news about running just a few rigs is any delays or problems on wells really enter the equation because you have such a small sampling. If we're running 10 rigs, you can have some issues or delays. We had a delay early in the year with some issues with the frac, completing frac jobs with someone. And we made a change there, and we lost six or seven weeks, and that was hurtful. But Jon, I don't think I see any real issues with getting to where we're projecting.

I don't either. And one of the things that our company has always been forward-looking on is how do we manage our infrastructure. And here, with Halcón, you can see our infrastructure plans are front-end loaded. And we've got a lot of -- we got a very strong capability early in our program, and I think that's key to really keeping us on target.

Great. And my follow-up, actually, did want to ask on the infrastructure side of things and how have you been successful building out your midstream capabilities in the past? How do you think we should really view what the ultimate value of what this midstream side of the business is going to be for you? If you look out a few years, what's kind of a ballpark way to look at it?

So, the first way to think of it is we are, so far, in front of requirements. We will not have delays based on infrastructure. And that is a huge maintenance issue for value, of course. If you have a drilling well and have to wait 6 months to get something done or if you wait on water all the time or heavy pipe in the ground, it's just a big issue. So we're way out in front of that. Ultimately, it depends somewhat on the capital markets and the valuation that's ascribed to those types of businesses. In the past, as you've mentioned, we have been somewhat successful in that area. We did maintain ownership of those things until we were comfortable that the basic spine and the basic layout of all the infrastructure was sufficient for the future. And it's just a matter of deciding if you have a good use for that money and it's -- there's a going rate for all of those fees, gathering and whether that's water transportation or gathering or whatever. And you can value the EBITDA and those really [Indiscernible] back of an envelope. And then in the past, the capital markets have been very supportive of those businesses, whether they're drop-down type partnerships or just outright sales. Early on, the most value for us is keeping our -- keeping way ahead -- keeping that infrastructure coverage way ahead of the rig, of the rigs. And it is front-end loaded, as Jon pointed out, which is everybody's watching the pennies. So, okay, so that is front-end loaded, and you can't shirk on that -- in that area. But it's quite valuable. It's towards hundreds of millions of dollars already, okay, I won't say that much.

Great. Appreciate that. Thanks guys.

Our next question comes from the line of Jeffrey Campbell from Tuohy Brothers. Your line is now open.

Good morning. My first question, kind of more of a narrow one, then I'll ask a little bit broader one for the second one. You announced your intention to exercise the Northern Option ahead of the well result of the Sealy Ranch 93 01H. I was just curious why you didn't wait for the well results first.

I -- let's just say this. I didn't announce that. Somebody in our company did unknown to me, we're going to have a little talk. We would never undertake an option before we had all of the payout option before we have all the data that we're entitled to. Period. That'd be, what would I say? I think the direction of your question is that would be stupid.

Right. Well, I was just going up what I saw in the press release. But it did strike me as a lot, which is why I wanted--

If that's in there, it's wrong, wrongheaded. But I don't remember that being in there. If it is, I don't think you do [Indiscernible] we'll try to make it very clear that we'll gather all the data that we're entitled to in a fair business like way before we undertake any contract.

Yes, Floyd, I think the press release, just to clarify this point, indicates we plan to exercise it based on where we sit today and what we know about the acreage. But we have not yet exercised it. And this is we're planning, and people are looking forward out of business, probably assume that, that capital we spent.

Okay. So, it's a bit forward-looking, Jeffrey. To drill the pilot hole out there and got the exact information we were looking for, we're fracking a 10,000-foot lateral in the western side of that acreage. We have a wonderful Bedford log, in the horizontal open hole log of the entire wellbore of that. And we have about 6,000 or 7,000 feet of the kind of rock -- exactly the kind of rock we were expecting. And then about 3,000 feet of rock that far surpasses our expectation. So, we're not expecting any curveballs when we finish cracking the well and get it on production within the next few weeks. But I think the word plan there, maybe though a curveball out there, we're -- our plan is to gather all the information that we're entitled to before we make any financial disbursements.

Well, that's a lot of color that I think -- that's a lot of confidence to the plan. My broader question was over the past few quarters, a number of the major E&Ps in the Permian have moved towards batch completions or they talked about cube development and multiple productive zones that avoid pad job production effects on pad completions. I'm just wondering what's your view on this issue and how it will affect your pad development, if any?

So, we're somewhat smaller than some of those companies. It's the obvious right answer to do that kind of development. But I think I need to suggest that, at least for our company, we need to step back and fully evaluate in all ways that we can what our frac jobs or leading us to in terms of spacing. So, I'm -- we are absolutely not prepared to cube out one of our drilling spacing units right now. Even if we were willing and have the fortitude to be on a pad like that for over a year and not have any income out of it, which does not set up for that, as you know, right now either. And we're very conscious of the parent-child relationship in all of these plays. We measure the hits we get in producing wells. And when wells are approximate, Jon is fracking them simultaneously or zipper fracking them and not putting them on until the same time. So, we'll do the best as we can to narrow the difficulties you might have from those things. But we're -- again, we're not really in a position to drill 20 or 30 wells in one cube development. And we're still evaluating some of the other zones in these areas. The Upper Bone Spring, the Third Bone, I mean, relatively clear. And then we've got some deeper zones in the Wolfcamp. And if you're really going to do a cube, I mean, you pretty much need to have all that stuff in front of you. Jon, what would add-on that? We talked about this a lot before.

I'll just at that the key for us on our particular acreage position is really understanding our optimal spacing and that's probably the first step in our development plan.

Now, that makes perfect sense. I mean, if I just translate what you just said, you're basically talking about capital cycle and you don't want to walk up too much capital for too long before you get the cash flow you want. But you're also going to grow so much over the next couple of years and this might be a topic that we could revisit in a few years and get a different answer. You think that's fair?

It's actually the right thing to do. In other plays, as they got more material and we got larger, we would do a pad all at one-time in many of this, but the plays were single pays. This is complicated with multiple pays. No real barriers between many of the pays, including the Third Bone and Upper Wolfcamp. Now there are some barriers in some of the Upper Bone. But -- so it's an issue. And so we're doing a lot of micro-seismic. We're doing a lot of pressure measurement and watching hits on every stage. So, we're going to get there, but right now, we're thinking, because just from experience, that we can develop these things on $6.60, Chevron style or [Indiscernible] style development from -- as you go from upper to lower, as you go from more shallow to more deep. But we really want to get that totally identified. And again, it's an output of how inefficient and how well-designed your frac jobs are.

Really appreciate the color. Thank you.

And our next question comes from the line of Tarik Mejjad from JPMorgan. Your line is now open.

Hi, good morning. This is actually Kevin Kwan calling in for Tarik. Thanks for taking my question. Just surrounding I know you guys are kind of scoring up the acreage in Pecos County. And I was just curious if there are any talks with the guys with potential acreage swaps for some of your partners, think of it dialing back [Indiscernible]?

Jon, go ahead and tell them something about that. But companies are sort of like people. You're running to one person and yes, let's go do this. You're running to another person, it takes a year to think about it. You run into third person, let anyone talk about it, we're too busy. Jon, what do you have to add about that? We're working that angle daily.

Yes, absolutely. We've been in contact with our neighbors per se. And things are in the works to try to consolidate acreage where we can. The focus a lot is optimal lateral lengths. And our focus is on 10,000-foot laterals so we're working with our neighbors on how do we consolidate acreage to optimize that type of development. We have made some small, small trades to consolidate acreage, but nothing, nothing major. We're talking a couple of thousand acres still.

I bet you have 10 or 15 conversations going right now, though.

Absolutely.

Okay. Thanks. That's helpful color. And then this is just on your 2018 guidance. I understand the sort of the range in your production guidance for four years, 15,000 to 19,000 barrels a day. Just kind of want to see sort of the ramp that you guys have had. What's kind of the assumptions that you make for the downside of the 15,000 versus the sort of an overall gauge of what the range is? How do you guys come to that range?

Yes. So, can someone in the company will cringe. But the midpoint of that guidance, we wouldn't put it out there if we didn't think we could exceed it. The downside of that guidance, the way that I view it, and Jon, you can help with this, purely timing issues where there was a major frac problem or a big fishing job, something that was really causing us delays that we just couldn't project for. Normal wear and tear and delays that's the bottom of the range and better far of the range is based on no delays and continued great results. What else, Jon?

I think you've nailed that there, Floyd. We have a small program, 3-rig program, running 1 fleet. Any delay could have worth our rig or the frac fleet could cause a delay. But I think that's been well addressed.

Okay. And my last one is just on cost-saving initiatives. Obviously, that's been an evolving thing. But just wanted to see sort of more granularity on more recent -- during the quarter, I think, some operators were speaking to sourcing frac sand locally, et cetera. Just wanted to get more detail on more recent cost-saving initiatives you guys are looking at.

Again, I'm leaning on Jon and I want him to pipe in here. But another part of running just a few rigs is we really can't afford to experiment. And not that these aren't a great experiments that are going on, and some of them are going to work out great. We hope they do. So, we're not really trying to save $0.5 million on a well because of the proppant. It's a worthy savings and we will be. But just thee rigs running and 1 frac spread. As you pointed out, what's the risk to our guidance? We just really can't -- we don't feel like we should be doing kind of the experimental things that you do to really, really trim costs at this juncture. We're watching costs quite avidly, of course. But Jon, what else about that and about the local frac sand?

I will say that--

We're not against, by the way, by any means. We're all for it. Go ahead, Jon.

Well, we've looked at, and we're talking to a number of sand providers that are located in the basin. The concern for us is that the crush strength of the 40 70 Brown is very similar to our closure pressure. And as Floyd mentioned, I think our key to our development at this point is execution and delivering positive well results. I hate to introduce a variable that would cause us to have some concern about that at this point. It would save about $0.5 million per frac. So, that's one way to look at it. And it's not something that we would rule out in the future, of course. Other aspects of it, as Floyd mentioned, we're looking at our costs, but being more efficient is really what drives costs. And as we look at our drilling results, especially in Pecos County, over the past three quarters, we've dropped -- we've had a reduction in drilling days that has a direct impact. It's pretty exciting when we can drill a 10,000-foot lateral on a single run with the rotors steerable. That's pretty impressive. And that's a direct -- that directly affects the bottom line. So we're looking at that. Obviously, when we talk about the central production facility that we're building in Ward, we minimize the equipment that we'll have on an individual location. So, that significantly drops our facility costs on each individual pad or location to nearly zero. So, those are type of things that we're looking at -- that are really going to drive our program as far as cost reductions and so forth.

And I think it'll be the 100 [Indiscernible] Brown has got sufficient crush strength if we need or want to use it? We don't use the ton of 100 mesh, but is that right?

That's correct.

Yes. And then the other piece of this is we've been doing this for a while in different basins and across the United States and from the beginning of the shale business. We always align ourselves with the top providers of goods and services in every area. They are never the cheapest. We never brag about our well costs or not low. We don't really -- we focus on them being the right amount of execution and safety and tiptop quality of any -- versus returns on capital. And we think returns on capital are the best measured with wells that you can replicate day in and day out without a lot of trouble.

All right. Thanks so much for the color.

Our next question comes from the line of Ron Mills from Johnson Rice. Your line is now open.

Good morning. This might be for Jon, but on the frac capacity, when you talk about having a spot frac crew, you've already been talking a bit about potential timing of that. Or is there any risk of kind of getting that spot crew to come in and out as needed? Or how do you plan that out based on some sort of normalized debt level?

Yes, go ahead, Jon.

Yes, so we had a spot crew that -- we have two crews operating right now in the basin. We look at our dock inventory. We pinpoint areas where it will be exceeding a normal drilling or frac inventory that we see as appropriate. And we start planning by planting for that particular period. But it's really done six, nine months ahead of time, and we're talking to a number of frac providers and making -- getting that message out that we'll be looking for some equipment and resources during a specific timeframe and keeping those conversations live. So, that's really how we plan for it. I can tell you that we're confident. We're seeing some opportunities that are available at this point. So, it's about relationships really and keeping that communication. But it's really, you have to be talking six to nine months ahead of time.

Ron, you didn't ask this, but we don't have a program where we intentionally drill wells that we don't complete. They're just where our plan is to complete our wells as soon after we finish drilling them, as is appropriate, given the need to have -- getting ready for the frac and then frac them and have the wireline unit available. So, we don't have a process of creating docks by any means. We're not in that camp. We operate some natural this because, I don't know, Jon, with three rigs, there's probably, what, less than five wells probably at all times once we catch up here?

Right. Just to speak where we're currently at, we've got five wells that are waiting on completion. However, two of those wells are on pads that we're either drilling a second well on or we plan to drill a second well in the near future. And the question asked earlier was how do you drive costs down or methodologies for that. In those cases, where we have -- we're going back to a location we do have a duct, we're able to frac two wells simultaneously. And by doing that, we can incorporate simultaneous operations within the spread. And that's where we are doing our wireline operations while we're fracking the other wells. So, that's just another way to drive our cost on in the things that we're looking at now.

Great. And then you mentioned a couple of times, Floyd, other zones. I know [Indiscernible] talked about the Wolfcamp C and the Woodford. And I know -- I think your inventories, you include some pace and these and some of the First and Third Bone Springs. But can you talk probably some of the differences across your position in terms of where you think you may have potentially a couple landing zones and either the A or the B? And any preliminary commentary at all on the Wolfcamp C or Woodford that have been recently discussed?

Yes. So look, you need 3D seismic, right, for almost anything that you do out here that's really meaningful. We're having brand-new seismic run on the Hackberry Creek area. We've got a new seismic and some newly reinterpreted seismic up on Monument Draw -- Hackberry Draw. We clearly have two or three landing zones in most of these areas in the upper section, which I would say encompasses whatever the A and B. There's, for sure, it's a thicker zone over in Ward County. So, that's clearly -- could be free in the upper. We don't -- we're not counting that way right now. There's great C opportunities in both areas. We just haven't got period. Over at Hackberry, the D, I'll call it D, it's a sand. It's a Wolfcamp sand. There's an old development also there. And it looks like it could really be an interesting play, fairly inexpensive, high liquid content gas wells that would be a nice add-on to these horizontal wells in the upper Wolfcamp. And then in the Bone, gosh, we're finding that there's no reason in some areas for us to think the second Bone's any different than the third other than it's specially displaced a little bit from -- in terms of vertical. The Woodford and Barnett over in the Ward area, it's a bona fide good project that we're going to move forward on in some fashion in 2018, primarily reconnaissance because we're running three rigs and keeping the balance sheet in shape and all that, we're a little bit constrained. But we own the right. And when you come to the office, if you do some time, Ron, or anybody else, I'll give you a whole the Bone Springs. I can barely read it. Our fine technology group, whole presentation in the Bone Springs you of both of our areas and also great view of what the potential is out there and it's a resource for sure, and it's widespread, both in the Bone and in the deeper zones. And it's one of those things that a small company running just a few rigs, it's going to take you well to actually do anything meaningful there. But you know how it is, it's great to talk about stuff, but man, until you drill it, you're just flapping your gums, right?

Right. All right guys. Thank you so much.

Our next question comes from the line of Jacob Gomolinski-Ekel from Morgan Stanley. Your line is now open.

Hey, thanks for taking the question. I guess, similar to some of the most recent questions. But as you look at a $57 prom price and you think about 2018 plans maybe into [Indiscernible] curve in the second half, you touched on levels you needed for a rig to pay for itself. But curious if you consider adding a frac spread contract in one if we roll up the curve and stay in the high 50s or if a 3:1 ratio is sort of rig, frac crews, what makes a lot of sense for you guys right now?

Three rigs, two frac -- two full-time frac spreads are too many for three rigs. I think you need 1.3 frac spreads for three rig. Is that right, Jon?

Yes, Floyd, that's correct.

Yes. So, if we're running more rigs, we're at in full-time spread, but we're not planning on it right now. We're not going to -- we have this delay earlier, and it cost us six or seven weeks. But we're catching up on that as we speak. So, we're not going to have an unusual number of wells that are waiting on frac. Many of them are going to be waiting because we're doing more than one well on a pad. So, it really wouldn't be physically -- wouldn't help us that much to bring another full-time fleet right now.

So, I guess, I mean maybe more in conjunction with that adding like half a rig or something. But that makes sense.

We added half a rig or a rig, we'd be looking at it for sure.

Okay. And then maybe some real quick -- two quick housekeeping questions. Just want to confirm, I guess, if we were to plan for that $108 million getting spent on that 8,320 acres net option, would that take net acreage to around 52,000 acres? Or is the reported 43,719 net acres, are you taking that option to account, realize a bit of housekeeping question?

That's okay. Quentin, how's that set up in the--

Yes, the 43,000 already includes that acreage.

Okay. Thanks. And then lastly, just on the cash -- the projections on cash flow on that helpful page six. Does that include spend on infrastructure as well? Or I don't know that, that's mostly front-loaded, and you've done a great job building that out ahead of time. But just wanted to confirm whether or not that was included there as well.

Yes, it does.

Okay. Great. That's it from me. Thank you very much.

And our next question comes from the line of David Beard from Coker Palmer. Your line is now open.

Hey good morning gentlemen. Thanks for the time. A big picture question as it relates to your comment on $60 oil. Is there also a time component there where you'd like to see oil trade with a six handle for certain period of time before considering adding a rig?

Since we hedge around the strip, our timeframe can be viewed as more than just a spot number. And as you think about this strip, if it's significantly backward-dated, it doesn't do us that much good. So, right now, the strip is constructed in a way, but it's not -- it's still backward dated even in the second half of 2018, first half, I believe, and certainly 2019. So, we look at the entirety of the period in which we spend the money and the budget and returns we're trying to at least freeze on that current spend. And yes, you'd want to see it. My often -- my comment was mid-60s, pretty much on a flat basis, allows a rig out here with pretty high drilling business and completion costs to carry itself CapEx versus EBITDA. So, that would mean you got to have at least a flat strip for a couple of years to certainly not backward-dated strip. But it's just the idea that we're not so fragile that if there were some good reason to add a rig, like a new zone or something, it's not a killer for us, and it's particularly not a killer roughly in the 60s. That was kind of the main thrust for us. We don't have a plan for that, by the way, right now.

No, that makes perfect sense. As it relates to the strip as you look at your longer-term guidance, if the strip is at that 51, 52 and you're rolling into 2020, would you still feel you're being in a position to add rigs? Or would you like -- or would you really need higher oil prices to do that?

Well, if you believe the chart that we put out, which we do, of course, we would have the wherewithal to add rig here and there. I guess, you can pull down to what's the smart move? I mean, it can grow significantly with just the rig count that we're proposing and if the oil prices are even less constructive day in and day out, you want to add a rig is been if you had the capacity so. It's hard to predict that sort of thing, but again, generally speaking, we look at the five years of strip. We try to hedge two or three of them. We like to see the five-year looking constructive. It doesn't have to be tangled the whole way, but it needs to be constructive.

Great. That's helpful. Appreciate the color.

And I'm showing no further questions. And I would now like to turn the call back to Floyd Wilson for any closing remarks.

Yes, thanks for dialing in whoever is on the call. I don't have a list or anything. I mentioned a few times, I loading Quentin appear, but we don't get too often, but if you feel like getting out there and seeing some awesome work being done out in the field, we'll arrange for that here at some juncture, couple of short inexpensive trips, no dancing girls, no giant buses or anything, it will just be we'll get together a bunch of pickups, go look at some real stuff that's going on. And I'd encourage you to think about that. Beyond that, we feel great about where we are. I think we're well-grounded in terms of what we can do with just a few rigs and keep the balance sheet strong and perhaps even strengthening, and we're enthusiastic and excited about what we're doing. So thank you and we'll talk to everybody sometime soon. Bye.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating in today's conference. This does conclude the program. You may now disconnect. Everyone have a great day.