Good morning, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Booz Allen Hamilton's Earnings Call covering First Quarter Fiscal Year 2026 Results. [Operator Instructions] I'd now like to turn the call over to the Head of Investor Relations, Dustin Darensbourg.

Thank you. Good morning, and thank you for joining us for Booz Allen's First Quarter Fiscal Year 2026 Earnings Call. We hope you've had an opportunity to read the press release we issued earlier this morning. We have also provided presentation slides on our website and are now on Slide 2. With me today to talk about our business and financial results are Horacio Rozanski, our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President; Matt Calderone, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; and Kristine Martin Anderson, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. As shown on the disclaimer on Slide 3, please note that we may make forward-looking statements on today's call, which involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results to differ materially from the forecasted results discussed in our SEC filings and on this call. All forward-looking statements are expressly qualified in their entirety by the foregoing cautionary statements and speak only as of the date made. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements. During today's call, we will also discuss some non-GAAP financial measures and other metrics, which we believe provide useful information for investors. We include an explanation of adjustments and other reconciliations of our non-GAAP measures to the most comparable GAAP measures in our first quarter fiscal year 2026 earnings release and slides. Numbers presented may be rounded and as such, may vary slightly from those in our public disclosures. It is now my pleasure to turn the call over to our Chairman, CEO and President, Horacio Rozanski. We're now on Slide 4.

Thank you, Dustin. Welcome, everyone, and thank you for joining the call. Today, Kristine, Matt and I will share our financial results for the first quarter of fiscal year 2026. The headline for today is that our first quarter performance played out as we expected. Matt will go deeper into our first quarter results in a few minutes. Ahead of that, I would like to frame our results in the context of the current environment and describe how we are accelerating our transformation to take advantage of the next inflection point. As I've said previously, all presidential transitions create some degree of near-term disruption followed by opportunity. The administration is driving fast change. And 6 months in, the government is still adapting. Agencies are realigning their priorities and in many cases, restructuring their own operations. We see overall demand strengthening, but near-term funding continues to move slowly through the procurement environment. While the overall tenor is more positive than it was weeks ago, this adjustment period is still underway and some uncertainty remains as submissions and contracts are still being reviewed. Our quarterly results reflect these dynamics. Top and bottom line performance matched our expectations with the brightest spots being book-to-bill and the resulting record backlog. As we look forward, we expect the full effects of the civil sector reset to manifest in our Q2 financials and intend to return to growth in the back half of this year. Our teams are all in, working with mission owners to ensure that as funding solidifies, Booz Allen can accelerate. As we look ahead, we are moving forward aggressively. We are meeting with senior administration officials and with customers at all levels. Our technology-based approach resonates loudly with their agendas. They see opportunity to invest in technology from AI to cyber to…

Thank you, Horacio, and good morning, everyone. As Horacio noted, we anticipated a period of short-term disruption and slowdown in funding, followed by real medium- to long-term opportunity as the new administration's priorities take hold. We continue to see both these forces play out in different ways and on different time lines across the business. In this environment, we are attacking opportunities with both ideas and optimism. I remain amazed at how quickly Booz Allen can transform and how deeply impactful our work is for the nation. Before diving into the numbers, I want to cover my 5 takeaways for the quarter. First, the first quarter played out very much as we expected. We delivered growth in revenue ex billables, where most of our profitability is generated, and at the bottom line. While difficult, we also quickly reshaped our talent base through targeted cost and headcount reductions that were heavily concentrated in our Civil business. Second, we are winning deeply technical, high-quality work that is in line with lasting mission priorities. We achieved an excellent quarterly book-to-bill of 1.42x and total backlog hit an all-time Q1 record of $38 billion. More important, the type of work we are winning underscores that our pivot to become the premier company bringing advanced technology to mission is working. Third, we deployed a significant amount of capital to generate value for our shareholders. In the quarter, we repurchased just over 1% of our outstanding shares. Fourth, we doubled down on the strategic bets that will propel the business forward. These include investing in solutions aligned with national priorities, bolstering our talent base, continuing to build mission-ready technology and strengthening our partnerships with commercial and defense tech companies. We continue to gain momentum in all these areas. And as a sign of our conviction, earlier…

[Operator Instructions]. One moment for our first question, and it's from Louie DiPalma with William Blair.

As part of your 1.4x book-to-bill, you won several, I would say, Palantir/Anduril AESC Awards over the past few months under the new administration, and you could also call these awards vintage Booz Allen with this Air Force Data Fusion Award. You said that the Department of Defense continues to review contracts. But is it fair to say that there is now a greater appreciation for all of the neat tech that you do bring to the table with all of your commercial tech partnerships? And is the procurement environment better than it was 3 months ago?

Why don't I start, Louie. I think it is, as you point out, fair to say that the business has stabilized in what is still a very dynamic environment. As we pointed out in the prepared remarks, there are contracts being reviewed. The tech is holding out extraordinarily well. The impact on mission is very strong. We feel very good about that. And our teams are working very closely with each of our customers. Our long-standing customers understand the value Booz Allen brings and the tech that we are producing and the fact that our technology and the awards you point out, what was really neat about them is these are all awards where Booz Allen is doing work for the warfighter, many times in the kill chain, that needs to need -- and the tech needs to work under some of the most extreme conditions. And everybody recognizes that while a lot of people can bring tech, we are the ones that can make it work in those conditions. And so that's why we're accelerating our transformation. That's why we're so excited about the work that we're winning and why we are spending all of our time really positioning for upside and for opportunities along the lines that you're describing. As we said, the procurement environment has improved, but it's still operating below historical speeds. And we're hoping and looking for and staying very close to it to do our part in ensuring that it regains speed. But overall, especially when you look past the immediate term, we feel very optimistic.

And recently, the Department of Defense's Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Office, they awarded large contracts to many of the language learning model providers from Silicon Valley. And with the Trump administration focus on commercial tech, what is the interest from Silicon Valley and these commercial tech providers to partner with you? And secondarily, what is the implications of you partnering with commercial tech with fixed-price outcome-based contracts?

Well, as you know, working with commercial tech companies has been a big part of our strategy now for years. We work with the smallest of companies, Series A through our venture fund all the way to significant partnerships with hyperscalers. We've been working closely with NVIDIA for 7 or 8 years. We've been working closely with AWS for years. And it makes sense to me that the department is getting more interest and getting more involved with the people that are building the foundational models that are powering the AI revolution. And at the same time, they need Booz Allen because we are the ones that make the tech work in mission. That's understood, I believe, by the department, but it's also understood by the commercial tech providers in our discussions with them, they see us as the best at doing that. They see us as the people they want to partner with. In many cases, I'm told by very senior people, by my counterparts in these companies that we are the one partner they would like to have in their portfolio, and we feel the same way about them. And so I think that from the standpoint of where we go forward, our ability to productize on top of their tech, the department's desire to do more outcome-based and this entire move towards deploying these technology faster are all positive secular trends for Booz Allen.

Great. And for Matt, with fixed price contracts, is this potentially a win-win for you and the customer?

Absolutely. I think we've been talking about our desire to move to more outcome-based and fixed-price contracts for years now. So it certainly has a potential to be a win-win for everybody.

Our next question is from Gautam Khanna with TD Cowen.

I had a couple of questions. First, I was curious if you could comment on the funded backlog trend? It's been down a couple of quarters in a row. I just wanted to square that with the overall book-to-bill.

Yes, I think it's entirely consistent with what we said, which is we're winning work. We've got a lot of positive demand signals, not just from our customers but from commercial tech partners that we're working with, but finding a little bit slow. So that's why you're seeing a relative decline in funded backlog, but increases in other portions.

Does that portend kind of a big catch up at some point? Or is there -- I mean, at what point is there an absolute level at which we should actually get concerned? Or I just wonder how do we -- at what point does it become a worry issue, if at all?

I think we've said that our year really will hinge on the extent to which the funding environment normalizes. This is an industry-wide issue. We're hearing it not just from companies like ours, but even from our venture part goes. So we're not concerned. We got a lot of confidence in the medium term. It's really just a timing issue, Gautam.

If I -- I'll just build on that by saying if you look at the passage of The One Big Beautiful Bill and the amount of money that is being directed towards significant technology investments, both in DoD and across the government, I think it portends -- that money needs to be put on contract, needs to be spent for the administration to advance its key priorities. So we fully expect that there will be increases along the line. The only question in our mind is how quickly do those get turned on.

Yes. Fair enough. I guess I'm also trying to get it. Typically, we have a September fiscal year-end flush or money has to be allocated. Do you anticipate that same seasonality this time around, given all the noise?

Yes. We're still planning for an acceleration. I mean there are significant mission needs. As Horacio mentioned, there is also the new funding in The One Big Beautiful Bill and also with the procurement environment being slow, there's a bit of a backlog for funding needs. But as Matt said, it's really a matter of timing, and we're waiting to see how that plays out.

Okay. A question I get frequently from investors is on the headcount targets for the end of the fiscal year for you guys. I believe it has to be about flat with the year-end 331. Just if you could talk about any sort of challenges in hiring? Are you seeing any? And how comfortable you are with the ability to onboard the people you need to hit the guidance?

Yes. We are very comfortable. We are pacing our hiring to demand. We are not seeing challenges in getting the talent that we need. It's just a matter of timing and matching the hiring with the demand. We're also driving more productivity in our teams, using advanced technology and delivery. And we, as Matt said, want to keep switching to an outcomes-based contracting approach. And I think taken all together, we're very confident.

Yes, just of build on what Kristine said, I think it's important to say, we are still hiring, right? We've hired almost 1,000 people in the quarter and attrition remains low. Large portions of our business we're winning work and expanding work. As Kristine said, this really is about matching supply and demand, so we're -- our focus right now is staying close to customers, driving mission impact and getting funding on contract and headcount will follow.

Terrific. Last one for me. The Advana contract, there seems to be some relook at that. And I just wondered if there's any impact to Booz this year or next?

I think the immediate form of the answer is I think the department is still thinking through their acquisition strategy for the next period. But at the same time, we're extremely proud of the work that we're doing, the impact that we're having. To my knowledge, Advana is the only scaled platform that can do what it can do across the federal government. I think that's widely recognized. And frankly, we've been able to win work across the government, including in some key civil missions, because what we did in Advana can be replicated. So I think overall, this is really positive. The other thing that I will say is we've done some interesting work in Advana around populating and bringing AI into those data streams, and that knowledge has allowed us to continue to drive AI across the vast majority of our contracts to the place where our AI business is still growing and expected to grow significantly this year. We're engaging in a number of discussions about how do we make that happen faster. And especially given the conversations that we're having in this week in Washington around AI Summit and the subsequent executive orders, we see a lot of upside.

Our next question comes from the line of Mariana Perez Mora with Bank of America.

So my first question is going to be about Golden Dome. Now that the reconciliation bill actually funded the purpose, and it has been well since the President announced this. What is the role that Booz Allen could play there? And how much visibility you have on how fast that could play out? It's more like a data operating system integrator, like what you're doing with TOC-L for the Air Force? Or like what else could Booz Allen be exposed to?

So Mariana, we are very close to what's happening with Golden Dome. As you know, Golden Dome itself got funded to the tune of $25 billion in the reconciliation package. And there's about another $24 billion additional for missile defense that has some overlap or some surrounding things, and then there's also intelligence aspects to this, and we are very close to everybody who's developing different piece parts. Booz Allen can play a variety of roles, and we're positioning to play a variety of roles. Some are more traditional aligned to the type of work that we do, especially on cyber and intel. Some are more aligned with other things that we've done, like you said, around data platforming and the like. But as we've discussed publicly around our Brilliant Swarms approach, we have, if not the one of the few meaningful answers to the Booz mid-course space-based interception, where our solution has modeled extremely well. And so we're excited about all of the possibilities staying very close to it and participating in the procurement process as it ramps up.

And then 2 more like specific questions about the near term. One, about -- Matt, you mentioned in the prepared remarks that civilian work or like the civilian revenue was expected to bottom into next quarter. How much of a headwind remains? And the second one, Kristine, you mentioned that the challenge on hiring was not like attracting that talent, but matching the demand and the ramp-up. Could you please give us some color around like how you think about that, how fast can you actually hire talent and actually deploy that talent, especially when you think about more like deeply technical roles or roles that need clearances?

Thank you. I'll start with Civil. I mean our Civil business is very stable and even though the environment is really dynamic. And we're still doing excellent work in bringing AI into software development, securing some highly visible national events using our public safety tech solutions, stopping fentanyl at the border, speeding veteran benefit eligibility determinations and our core work that we have in many agencies is still continuing. So the onetime reset from the first quarter, now that we have that behind us, it's actually quite stable in Civil, and we are very confident moving into the medium term. And as Matt said, preparing to return to growth in Civil. With respect to hiring, I think when I talk about matching, it's not so much technical -- worried so much about matching from a technical perspective. We do a great job recruiting across all the technical disciplines that we need. It's more that as Civil declined and Intel and Defense are growing faster, just matching with the security clearances, location, et cetera, for where the work is growing. We are actually quite good at this and have done a lot of work last fiscal year in automating a lot of those processes and getting much better matching algorithms and using AI in our hiring and recruiting. And so that's an area that we're quite confident in that we can handle that going forward.

Our next question is from Colin Canfield with Cantor.

Maybe talking through the nonoperational cash flow building box. Starting with cash tax, you suggested $200 million in '26 and $170 million in '27. Is it fair to assume that there are continued repeat benefits in '28 to track to that sort of curve? And then if we think about the VC kind of funding tailwind environment, using Albedo as an example, right, where it's already doubled in terms of private valuation. But maybe talk us through kind of how we should think about potential tailwinds from that in the '27 to '28 time period in terms of like a cash flow number or something like a net income number?

Yes. Thanks, Colin. I'll take them. So look, we had 2 really positive cash occurrences in the quarter. First, the passage of The One Big Beautiful Bill that's going to create about $200 million cash tax benefit for us this year, and I will highlight that, that's federal cash tax benefit only, as we're waiting to see how the states will react and implement. And then second, in Q1, we reached a favorable agreement with the IRS related to strategic tax planning initiatives from prior years around R&D tax credits. We talked about this for a couple of years now and had approximately $150 million receivable on the books as well as an uncertain tax position reserve related to this topic. So really positive outcome there. You saw the impact from an accounting standpoint flow through our GAAP P&L this quarter, and we anticipate getting a cash refund of $170 million next. So $200 million cash this year, $170 million approximately next year, we're still waiting to see what's going to happen from a state perspective on The One Big Beautiful Bill. There will be a small recurring benefit because there's no more $174 million drag in our cash taxes going forward. It's not going to be nearly to the magnitude of $200 million. We actually haven't quantified that yet, but you'll see some small recurring benefit from a federal cash perspective -- cash tax perspective at minimum. On the venture side, look, I'm really pleased with the performance of Booz Allen Ventures and excited about the increase in our commitment. We've been at the forefront of bringing commercial tech to government for decades. And so Booz Allen Ventures has been a very natural extension of this commitment to ensuring America's technical superiority of our adversaries long term and near term that some of our critical mission gaps in our clients or our customers are filled. So it's still early, but the fund's financial performance to date is in the top decile of comparable funds. It's all been on paper so far. To your point, we do expect to see some cash tailwinds, as gains from these investments are realized, but we're also going to be investing. So I wouldn't build anything in your models, right, because we're upsizing our commitment, but we're also going to be seeing the returns from some of our early investments. But look, we continue to grow and innovate with these port cos, whether it's integrating Hidden Layers' products into our commercial cybersecurity and incident response solutions, we're building on top of SEEK's technology, we're bringing hidden level onto our programs where we're having real impact at the edge. I think it's -- our commitment to Booz Allen Ventures is just another sign of how we're going on offense and how we're accelerating our strategic transformation.

Got it. That's great color. I appreciate it. And then in terms of like quarter-to-date, do you have a good sense of kind of how many -- like how much bookings we have quarter-to-date and kind of what that bridges us to in terms of a potential book-to-bill for the next fiscal quarter?

Yes. It's still early in the quarter, Colin, but as we've said a couple of times here, right now, we're not focused on bookings as much as getting funding and getting things started and ramped up. We've got a really robust pipeline. We're excited about not just the quantity, but the quality of the things that we have in our pipeline. Whether it's realized this quarter or next quarter, less important to us right now than then getting work started.

Got it. And then as long as we're kind of asking multipart questions here, can you maybe speak to the contracting officer environment and how The Big Beautiful Bill spend getting passed is interacting with the accounts of funding officers in terms of outlays versus awards and like that translation of basically freeing up money now alongside what, I'd say, is a constructive '25 CR versus waiting for Congress to get back and pass '26 full regular budgets?

Yes. As we said a couple of times, the funding is moving more slowly. Part of that is having fewer contracting officials to actually move the funding. And some of it is just the, I think, drag from the last quarter of multiple reviews and getting back on solid footing. There is a lot of demand for the work on the mission areas, not just at The One Big Beautiful Bill. And so we are still planning for that logjam to break and that will play out over the next few weeks.

One moment for our next question, it comes from Sheila Kahyaoglu with Jefferies.

Maybe 2 questions. One on -- both on headcount, but long term and on shorter term. So longer-term big picture, how do we think about headcount as it relates to Booz? Is this administration maybe buying differently than other administrations where Booz has typically been very successful in adding contract scope and work given the work you guys do, but this administration might be more focused on like transformational contracts like Golden Dome or whatnot? So does that put you at a disadvantage? And how do you think about that?

Why don't I start? I think it's a combination. I think as Kristine pointed out, there's a lot of demand on the contracting shops and so using existing vehicles is the way to accelerate funding on to contracts. And so we expect to see movement there. The fact that we're at record backlog levels and have ample sealing makes us feel good. How about that dynamic as things hopefully begin to accelerate shortly. But at the same time, as you point out, there's significant new demands against new areas. There's -- The Big Beautiful Bill had very targeted funding and -- against new priorities. And those will likely play out as new contracts. Certainly, that's what we're seeing largely, for example, around Golden Dome, which we were talking about before. So I think it's really all of the above on that. As we've been saying for the last couple of calls, the impact on headcount is the work needs to be performed differently. I think AI is here and here to stay. We -- again, we've been preparing for this for years. We both understand the technology, our drivers of it and are using it very aggressively into our own programs to both increase the efficiency of the work, make it happen faster and deliver to the government better value. And together with that, I think there's resonance around the fact that some of these contracts to operate that way need to move more towards fixed price or outcome-based. And that should give us if we continue to be at the leading edge of this, both again, opportunity to create value, but also opportunity to capture that value through upsized margins. Now that's going to play out over the medium to long term because as we're saying in the near term, there's a lot of things that need to get done right away and moving something to fixed price or outcome-based is an onerous task. So still work to be done, but a lot of optimism both on the demand and the supply side for us.

Yes. And I would add that technology has long been the only source of permanent increases in productivity. And our early experience with AI-assisted coding is exactly that for -- in terms of supercharging that effect. But as we stand today, there's a lot of tech debt in government. We've had a lot of focus on this on why it takes so long to do transformation and modernization. And our experience so far is that in using some of these AI-assisted tools, we can get through that tech debt a little bit faster. And then I think what's really exciting is how we can use AI to push the limits because federal emissions are so far scaled beyond other missions and they operate at the limit of technology, and so better technology is going to get better mission outcomes.

Got it. And maybe to that point then, when you look at your revenue per employee, it was up 8% in the quarter. How do we think about the -- that revenue per employee number? How should that trend? Is that like a pricing benefit? And maybe, yes, I guess how does that trend? And how do we think about headcount to end the year?

Yes, I'll take that. I think, look, over time, these trends should disconnect our growth algorithm a little bit from headcount growth, right? If you talk about outcome-based contracting or fixed price contracting, empowering our incredible talent with AI-assisted coding and other tools, as Kristine just described, that should make them more productive and, therefore, revenue per employee go up. In the short term, Sheila, I think we've talked about this year, our performance really being predicated on when to what extent we see a normalization in funding. And I would expect normalization in hiring to follow along with that. In the short run, the -- our folks are being more productive, but the core algorithm is probably going to hold for this year.

And so headcount stays flat from here. Is this a stable level?

We certainly anticipate adding headcount based on how -- when and how funding comes in, right?

And our last question comes from the line of Jonathan Siegmann with Stifel.

There's been various directives and executive orders referencing changing software acquisition, trimming the FAR and we've already talked about moving to outcome-based contracting. Could you maybe characterize just how you're thinking about? What are the -- how disruptive are these changes? And what are you most excited about for the long term in this new environment? Are there specific actions that we should be really watching to get a sense of how things are changing?

Sure. So I'll get us started. The -- as we've been saying, there's a number of things that we believe are both good for the nation and for the government and, therefore, good for Booz Allen. Certainly, a rewrite of the FAR is overdue. The FAR over time, it has been sort of layer upon layer upon layer to a level of regulatory burden that adds a ton of cost to the entire industry, certainly to Booz Allen and because it adds it to the entire industry to the federal government itself. And so clearing that out, I think would give everybody an opportunity to operate faster, more nimbly and more efficiently, which, again, benefits everybody. So hopefully, that will land relatively soon and it will land into a more streamlined environment. The second thing I would say is there's a -- all of the executive orders, including the ones from this week around accelerating the use of technology and especially accelerating the use of AI are fundamental. So I think you've heard me talk about the fact that we need to move faster. Certainly in a geopolitical competition, our nation needs to move faster. And some of the things that we're talking about even this week, and again, the most recent years around streamlining, accelerating data center construction, especially the things around exporting AI around the world, we think are fundamental and Booz Allen has a role to play in that and an opportunity to capture value from it. So -- and then I could keep going, but -- and certainly, outcome-based, we've talked about forever and the more we move to outcome- based, they're better for the nation, they're better for Booz Allen. So we think that this environment of pushing technology faster into mission and removing some of the barriers to that are the things that both excite us the most and give us over the medium term, the most upside.

And this concludes our Q&A session, and I will turn it back to Horacio Rozanski for final remarks.

Thank you, Carmen. And thank you, all of you for joining us today and for your questions. I hope we gave you a sense of the environment of our near-term performance, but especially of our excitement over the medium term around how our business is evolving and the upside that we see. I'm really proud of Booz Allen in this period of change. Booz Allen is the advanced technology company committed to making America stronger, safer and faster. And I'm particularly proud of the people of Booz Allen that are making all of this happen. They truly are special, and I'm proud to call than my colleagues. And with that, thank you. Have a great rest of the summer, and we'll talk to you soon.

Thank you, everyone, for participating in today's program. And you may now disconnect, and have a great day, everyone.