Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Brooks Automation Q1 Fiscal Year 2016 Financial Results Conference Call. During the presentation, all participants will be in a listen-only mode. Afterwards, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded Wednesday, February 3, 2016. I would now like to turn the conference over to Lindon Robertson, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, Cersei, and good afternoon, everyone. We would like to welcome each of you to the first quarter financial results conference call for the Brooks fiscal year 2016. We will be covering the results of the first quarter ended on December 31, and then we will provide an outlook for the second fiscal quarter ended March 31 of this year. A press release was issued after the close of the markets today and is available at our Investor Relations page of our website, www.brooks.com, as are the illustrated PowerPoint slides that will be used during the prepared comments during the call. I would like to remind everyone that during the course of the call, we will be making a number of forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Litigation Securities Act of 1995. There are many factors that may cause actual financial results or other events to differ from those identified in such forward-looking statements. I would refer you to the section of our earnings release titled Safe Harbor statement, the Safe Harbor slide on the aforementioned PowerPoint presentation on our website, and our various filings with the SEC, including our Annual Reports on Form 10-K and our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. We make no obligation to update these statements, should future financial data or events occur that differ from the forward-looking statements presented today. I would also like to note that we may make reference to a number of non-GAAP financial measures, which are used in addition to and in conjunction with the results presented in accordance with GAAP. We believe that these non-GAAP measures provide an additional way of viewing aspects of our operations and performance. But when considered with GAAP financial results and the reconciliation of GAAP measures, they provide an even more complete understanding of the Brooks business. Non-GAAP measures should not be relied upon to the exclusion of the GAAP measures themselves. On the call with me today is our Chief Executive Officer, Steve Schwartz. We will open with his remarks on the business environment and our first quarter highlights, then we will provide an overview of the first quarter financial results and a summary of our financial outlook for the quarter ending March 31, which is our second quarter of the fiscal year 2016. We will then take your questions. During our prepared remarks, we will from time-to-time make reference to the slides I mentioned available to everyone on the Investor Relations page of our Brooks website. With that, I would like to turn the call over now to our CEO, Mr. Steve Schwartz.

Thank you, Lindon. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining our call. We're pleased to have the opportunity to report the results of the first quarter of our fiscal year 2016. We finished the slower Q1 with much optimism for the coming calendar year. Although revenue in the quarter of $120 million was down 18% from September, we had $141 million in bookings without including orders from BioStorage, which indicates some rebound in March and gives us confidence that June will be up from there. In semi, we began to see orders pick up for 10-nanometer pilot lines and for systems that would go into back-end and advanced packaging lines. And our outlook for life sciences is strong on the back of a healthy bookings quarter and by the addition of BioStorage Technologies. We are particularly pleased with the adoption of new products that we’ve developed for the semiconductor and life sciences markets. We ship these advanced products to our most important customers and are getting favorable early performance report cards. These products will begin to generate revenue this year. So, all in, we are very positive about 2016 and the chance to once again improve our performance year-over-year. In semiconductor, our business was down consistent with the equipment industry and with what you’ve heard from other critical sub-supplier peer companies. Our semi and global services business were down at combined 23% quarter-over-quarter and down approximately 7% from the December quarter one year ago. However, when we look at a comparison against full calendar years, we are pleased to report that in the year, which was relatively flat for semiconductor equipment, our semiconductor product business grew 26% from calendar year 2014 to 2015. That results at a combination of 21% growth in our front-end semi business and 85% in…

Thank you, Steve. Please refer now to the PowerPoint slides available on the Brooks website under our Investor Relations tab. I will draw your attention to slide three, which is a consolidated view of our operating performance to begin our remarks. Top-line revenue decreased 18% sequentially to $120 million largely due to the anticipated downturn across the semi capital equipment industry which was partially offset by one month of contributions from the BioStorage Technologies acquisition. Non-GAAP gross margin was 35% which was down two points from the prior quarter. BioStorage will sustain and improve our average margins going forward, but this quarter diluted our gross margins by 70 basis points. I’ll say more about this business in a few minutes, but if you look at our results briefly without the acquisition, the gross margin is down 1.4 points sequentially, largely driven by the diminished fixed cost absorption, which comes with the lower volumes in product solutions. The income tax equation helped us this quarter as we had a total benefit of $1.2 million benefit not an expense. This included the R&D tax credit approved by Congress and the benefit of the jurisdiction on export profit and loss equation. Non-GAAP earnings per share landed at $0.02 for the quarter. Let’s turn on to Page four and look at the segments. Except for closing the acquisition faster than expected, the revenue in the quarter came in as we had expected from the beginning of the quarter. The trend primarily reflects the sharp decline seen across the capital equipment market for semi, with product solutions down 26% compared to the fourth quarter and global services down 10%. Life Science Systems showed growth driven by $6.5 million of revenue from the BioStorage acquisition, excluding the effect of this acquisition, the base business in life…

Thank you very much. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Edwin Mok with Needham & Company. Please proceed with your question.

Hey, guys. Thanks a lot for taking my question and congrats for a good quarter and result – guidance. So first question I have on Life Science, if I kind of look at the numbers. It’s up around $47 million this year versus last year based on your outlook for the year. But I think, your BioStorage cut well ahead of $40 million last year and given the growth and the strong bookings you just reported, I would have thought that your Life Science can even do better than that. Is it just conservative sum or is it some timing of that and I think Steve mentioned revenue recognition maybe slow and then I have a second. Can you give us some color on that?

Yes, Edwin. Appreciate that, because I think it can be a little confusing. Remember that, we did say it would be on a 20% growth rate, but that’s for a full year basis and in the first two months of this fiscal year we did not own the business. So we will have it ten months out of the year, not a full year, but it is on a 20% growth rate. So I think you are – you would actually factor in somewhere in the 40 to a 40s number there and then you would be - balance of 75% would be what you would be seeing in the balance of the business and we’ve got Dusty" Tenney held to the fire on this, but we expect that we are going to optimize the portfolio here and shoot to achieve and to please on this number. I don’t call it conservative, but we are very optimistic about this number.

So, excluding Power Storage, you guys expect some growth was in the year than and I think Steve talked about the Cryo product and then I think time for revenue to be recognized. Is that just timing of revenue or qualification? Can you give us some color?

Yes, I think inside of the – if you just touch the numbers I said, and let’s just say it’s 75, that compared to $68 million in last year. That’s a little more than 10% growth and the bookings that we are putting in now are going to help build in the second half revenue as a starting point, but it will some into 2017, because it takes a typical customer ordering a large system. Sometimes 8 to 10 months. A few of them will take a system in six to eight months, but many times, it’s a one year project for them. So, we start building and as you know we use per synergy completion, so we will build some of that in a few months. But it will take little time for that to pick up. The cryo products, the BioStore III, it’s going to be a great product for us. As we said, we anticipate, perhaps $1 million of revenue this coming quarter. It’s going to be based on an adoption rate. So inside here, we do have some revenue factored in for that growth around that product and more important to us, I think is the whole ecosystem around it. The value chain, we see an opportunity to fill more and more value around them.

Great, that’s very good color. And jumping on to the semi cap side, I think, Steve you talk about share gain especially on Edge, Deps and with these new processes, right. I want to kind of focus on 3D-Nand and is that what you can kind of think about how much market share position you have improved from kind of the plainer traditional Nand versus some of the new process for 3D-Nand?

Yes, Edwin, we don’t look at so much as the process is the OEMs who we serve. So we have very high position in Edge and we have very high position in CVD. So when we assess the market share we have across the board, we are – the vacuum robotics are somewhere in the range of 70 plus percent market share. So anything that drives Dep or Edge drives that vacuum automation and Nand is obviously, Nand is an enormous user of Dep and Edge.

Helpful, so, okay, great. Okay, that –we can talk to the technology until, lastly, just on the CCS product, I want to clarify with your commentary. Are you seeing that, based on the leading-edge 10-nanometer investment that you expect to start in the second quarter as a testament in the large OEM that you start to see business, start to pick up in calendar second quarter? And I think you made some comments about non-leading edge, have you start to see any adoption of those products on the non-leading edge?

Yes, so Edwin, I’ll do my best. The connection wasn’t the most clear, but I think you asked about, first the 10-nanometer pilot production. In prior quarters, we already shipped some automated food cleaning tools to 10-nanometer pilot lines and in the current quarter, we will add more of those systems into those pilot lines. So, to be clear, we’ve installed some for 10-nanometer, we are installing more in this quarter. And of course, we anticipate, if there is more – if there is more build out in the second half of the year, then we will ship tools for more 10-nanometer production. In the non-leading edge foundries, what we’ve seen now is, particularly in China as the foundries get to 28-nanometer, they too are buying the food cleaning products from us and as a matter of fact, one of the products that’s particularly well suited to some of the China foundries is the M-330 product that we got as a result of the Contact acquisition. So it was a good midline product in the portfolio that suits particularly well. So, we have a complete range, but we are seeing the second-tier foundries now become heavier users of the CCS products. It was anticipated that would be the case, it’s proving out now that they are moving toward 28-nanometer.

Great. That’s all I have. Thank you. I appreciate it.

Thanks, Edwin.

The next question comes from the line of Patrick Ho with Stifel Nicolaus. Please go proceed with your question.

Thank you very much and congratulations on the outlook. First in terms of the BioStorage acquisition, I know it’s really early in the – I guess, the process, but as you discuss the acquisition on customers with both ends, both your core storage systems customers as well as the BioStorage customers, where do you see kind of the growing interest of leveraging the products with one another. So, are you seeing more from the storage guys seeing the service opportunities about storage offers or are you seeing the large customer base that BioStorage has being a potential leverage for your core business?

Yes. Thanks, Patrick. Actually, it’s a really good question. It’s the one of the ones we spend lot of time on diligence if you will, but I think it’s one way also for which we have a good answer. Very often, for some of the large institutions, for example, that will have archive samples and the one that have – one those to be handled with precision, the ones to be handled with extreme care BioStorage Technologies has done a tremendous job with that. They also have on-site services that they are able to apply. But what we find is that often these institutions will have an onsite capability where they have high velocity or they’ll use samples quite a bit and those need to be stored onsite nearby, because those are active samples if you will. But there is a point at which some get archived and so the combination if you will of the tools that we provide at the customer sites, where Brooks has a very strong presence and the process capability from BioStorage, that’s an opportunity at the customer sites and when we look at the opportunities that exists at BioStorage for the more longer term storage or the bulk shipments that go back and forth occasionally, the processes that BioStorage has coupled with some of the tools from Brooks, we think will enhance that offering as well. So it’s onsite for higher velocity samples and remotely for more archival kinds of storage. It’s a tremendous combination and it offers an opportunity to both entities to increase the capability in both ends of that chain if you will.

Great. That’s helpful. And on the semiconductor side of things, you saw a very strong growth on the advanced packaging side this year and you are probably well aware, we are starting to see a larger trend, specifically this year on the packaging side of things. Can you kind of just give color on what provided customers with key differentiators with your products and how you will benefit from this emerging trend that seems at least sustainable over the next couple of years?

Sure, Patrick. We have a pretty quick design capability that we have – what we call the jet common platform which is particularly well suited to some of these back-end lines. It’s a common platform that the customer will recognize now across many OEM products and what we’ve done is, we’ve spent a lot of time to adapt to different configurations of wafers in the back-end. So, wafers that are clamped in a frame, wafers that have been thinned and are not as rigid or as flat as conventional front-end wafers, at the same time, we have vacuum tools that go into some of the process tools that go into the back-end. So we’ve taken the front-end capability and we’ve adapted it exactly to sometimes unusual substrate configurations, but we’ve been able to move very quickly for some of the OEMs and Patrick, I think the main reason here is, we started this activity three or four years ago. So we identified the back-end as an opportunity and we were willing as the leading provider of automation to go with some of these smaller players knowing that the back-end was going to be potential for us to get in. And so business that we might not have been actively pursuing several years ago, we actively went after it and we are seeing it bear fruit now as the volumes are picking up for some of these, what I would have considered tier-two players in the back-end.

Great. Thank you very much.

Thanks, Patrick.

The next question comes from the line of Ben Rose with Battle Road Research. Please proceed with your question.

Good afternoon. I have a few questions actually. With the discussion around the CCS business having been down as expected in this quarter, and your expectation for it picking up later on the year, I am a little confused as to what is driving the pick up in March? Whether it’s kind of a sustained follow-through in some of the back-end products that you discussed or whether there are other front-end products that you are selling that are accounting for this sequential pick up?

Sorry, Ben. I am going to – this is Steve – I’ll try the first part and then I will share the answer. On the CCS products, these that are contamination control solutions, those are mostly been driven by foundries. So, from 28-nanometer, down to 10-nanometer, and these are the cleaning products mostly for the food carrier cleaning products and most of those shipments are to China and to Taiwan. And some of the 10-nanometer is for pilot line production and the foundries in China if you will are for 28-nanometer foundry capacity.

Just to keeping in perspective on the revenue size, last quarter we shared that we had, right at $17 million and it’s down 53% this quarter to about $8 million.

Right.

And then, we anticipate growth from here. So this is the business that we acquired about two years ago and when we acquired it, we spent $32 million. So this $8 million of revenue is actually kind of interesting, it’s such a down – it’s a down quarter. Of course last quarter was quite large, but even with this $8 million if you were just looked it on n run rate it’s $32 million still we are really pleased with this business and the growth aspects, and the applications space that it’s going into.

Okay, and Steve, with regard to your comments about China, was that more of, kind of a longer-term bullishness that you have about your prospects there or would you see China, and the customers that you mentioned earlier contributing to the first half of the year?

Yes, we’ve had a good business in China now for ten years. But what we see is, there are more OEMs showing up in China and they are keen to have automation and cryogenic technologies that will be enabled in fabs very quickly. So we are able to have very high share there, but we are really impressed by the growth opportunities that exists in China and what we foresee is, that as China begins to add more semiconductor manufacturing capacity in China that we anticipate that some of the local OEMs will be encouraged or favored if you will to provide systems to those fabs when they are able. So we think it’s been prudent for us to engage those OEMs as we think their business ha a chance to grow as the semiconductor manufacturing continues to grow rapidly in China.

Okay, thanks. And then just two quick questions on the life sciences business, exclusive of the BioStorage Technologies’ contribution in this quarter. It looks like the life sciences business was down sequentially. Was that mostly due to tough year-over-year comparisons with regard to large storage systems or are there other factors that play there?

The statement we have, we have $14.4 million and that’s down $2.6 million from the previous quarter, the fourth quarter.

Right.

And it was largely weaker store systems and that reflected, we had fairly slow bookings over the last – really over the last four quarters. That was a slower year. We had a few bookings and the thing that we reflect on one as Steve said in this quarter, it was nice to see a come back. We’ve said – we’ve always said for the last three years that this has been a lumpy business. We saw a real backing of that infrastructure investment this last year. What we still are pleased about is our win rate throughout the time period from time that we launched the twin bank has been really high as Steve indicated, we had a really high win rate again this quarter on the deals that came to market. And so, it will take a little while for that revenue to turnaround, because it is an infrastructure build. But, Ben, that’s the primary reason.

Okay. And then, finally, with regard to how BioStorage fits in from a profitability standpoint, it sounds like, on an operating basis, the company is profitable, but it’s gross margin structure is lower than your life science business. It is currently – I am not clear on whether that’s simply because of the genomics’ contribution in this quarter or whether the business can help to improve gross margins in particular for life sciences over the course of the coming year?

Yes, actually, that’s a good assessment. We did have a weaker margin month. That’s the operative board, it was a month of business and it was the December month. So, in that December month, there is some funny things that happen as customers have budgets at the end of their calendar year and the business saw an unprecedented level of service revenue in that month, but it had an unusual mix to this genomic services. And so the, the margins that we’d been through all the history of the company and through diligence and through the recent history and it’s also a very unusual margin result for the month. So it is lower, but it’s not where we anticipate the business is and I think the real important point for you and that our investors to understand, we acquired the business, we looked at it without the genomic services and then we viewed it with the genomic services as a really nice customer add-on for the customer. But it brings modest incremental profit, but that’s not only know about the business but it’s a nice customer feature to have one stop shopping for them. So, anyway, that’s it. It brought in a little less margin on a percentage basis. It was accretive in the first month. I was pleased about that and we are happy on the prospects going through the rest of the year.

Okay, thanks. That’s very helpful.

[Operator Instructions] The next question comes from the line of David Duley with Steelhead Securities. Please go ahead.

Thanks for taking my question. Congratulations on a nice guidance and a path of recovery in the life science profitability. That’s great. First question is on the overall exposure to – and in listening to you answer previous questions it sounds like there two areas you have, wafer handling, two pieces of the puzzle and then some sort of vacuum products offerings. What are the applications that the vacuum is used for in the back-end?

Yes, David. We will get into the details, because as I said, when I answered the one exposed necessarily the customers, but they are conventional processes that are done also with the front-end. So there are Edge and there are deposition steps. So of the 29 design wins that we have seven are for vacuum robotics or vacuum systems and the remainder are for atmosphere products.

Okay. But that’s – so you have both – for definite you have both the vacuum and then a wafer handling exposure?

We do.

Okay, great. And could you help us just, for maybe calendar 2015 gives the size of your overall back-end business, so we can understand what it means when it grows?

Last year, we said that the back-end in the package space that we would hit about $30 million for the year and that was up in a range of about 60% and that was for our fiscal year. The back-end as we finished the calendar year, actually the growth rate was – on those fourth quarter period, compared to the previous calendar year 2014, I had – it was up more than 80%. I mean, that was a really remarkable growth for that time period and so that’s the ballpark that we are – what we are planning in. So, as we described this last year, David, I recall you had some interest on this and it was – what we would have said smaller, it’s beginning in last year. We said it be meaningful when we exited 2015 and here we said it was something greater than $30 million that’s grown at this pace and we see the applications being not just relevant, but diverse in the amount of customers as Steve emphasized, we had 25 customers in this space. So, we really love this space now.

Yes, great. And, with that in mind, and looking at your front-end product offerings, I would just think based on your commentary that if we have a flat WFE that you will be growing your semiconductor businesses in calendar 2016?

The back-end can drive that, yes, Dave.

Do you think it will grow, if the overall wafer fab equipment market was flat would your fund-in oriented products grow year-over-year or you get market share gains?

Again, it will go with – Dave, it will go with the definite. The reason we’ve outgrown pretty significantly over the past couple of years is because, in a flat WFE environment, those processes are growing. So we will continue to ride that as long as they continue to expand share so what we – at a faster rate than WFE.

Okay, and help me understand – you’ve talked of those bunch of moving pieces in the life science business, but just – so we can understand it on somewhat 30,000 foot perspective, how exactly do you go from your current operating loss to profitability by – I think you mentioned to the June quarter or September quarter. What are the steps that you will take to achieve that?

Well, one let’s reflect on the steps that we’ve taken, as we said, we took out a couple of million dollars to fix cost and the biggest part of that came between the fourth and the first quarter and so we had that benefit late into the structure of our business. However, we also had some slowness in revenue. But you can see that in the revenue projection as Steve shared, we expect to be around $26 million this next quarter compared to the $21 million and we also told you by the way that the BioStorage business will go from $6.5 million to about $10 million. So you can see there is growth on both size of the business and so that growth we anticipate to be leveragable and so that’s where we think we cut our loss in half in the next quarter. If our drop through generally is in the 40% range and some areas of the business, it could be 50% depending where the revenue materializes and so that incremental revenue is going to come at a really nice pace for us in terms of profit contribution. There is some areas that the team is really working on continued cost improvements both on the execution of projects as well as the overall structure of the business and I don’t want to take anything away from them on that. They still have the eye on that and we have a little bit planned in for that. But the bulk of this year I think you would – I think the best way to describe is going to be leveraging the structure that we position now with the revenue growth.

So, this summarizes, but cost-cutting that you already did on the fixed cost side and then the revenue growth that you expect in the business based on the orders you just achieved would be the two main drivers to the improved margins?

Yes.

Great. And. I noticed stock comp went up dramatically in your financial; statements. What could we expect for that going forward?

Yes, that’s a great question. So, we replaced our – I’d ay we replaced, I always think of it as replacing, but we issued this three year performance-based stock grant in this quarter and that replaced one that was three years old and if you may recall three years ago, the company was an outpefomer. So it had already fallen off. So you are basically accruing now into a full program when we displace something that was smaller. And so that gives you growth on a quarter-to-quarter basis just based on your required accrual. We had some other adjustments that or maiden true ups et cetera, but that - the primary driver here was the expansion of the program. Going forward, you would expect that this will come down a little bit, actually, I should say in this coming quarter, we have our Board compensation. We always face that in the second quarter and so you may see it to be approximately flat and then after that, I think you would see it trail-off just a little bit on a normalized basis.

Thanks.

Yes, thank you, Dave. Appreciate your question.

Our next question comes from the line of Farhan Ahmad with Credit Suisse. Please proceed with your question.

Thanks for taking my question. My first question is regarding your life sciences business. You gave very good targets for the year in terms of your quarterly revenue projections. I was wondering if you could provide us with some kind of quantitative or even like rough idea on how much operating profits we can expect in the fiscal year?

Farhan, we are going to be shy on doing it, but here is the objective is, as we indicated, we would cut this loss in half in this next quarter and then get the breakeven in the following quarter. So, one, I could tell you the $4 million loss this quarter should go to around $2 million or better this next quarter. So we’ll have – you could anticipate a $6 million in the first half and then we said, we are going to show some profit in the second half remains to be seen and we are just not going to put a number on that. But I think from that point forward, our objective and drive is to see profitable business going forward from there and that’s the message we have inside our business. That’s the focus we have and that’s what we wanted to share with you today to make sure you see that objective. I know there would be a tremendous interest to see the power of that earnings and I think it’s going to become very clear as we get into that fourth quarter. Keep in mind that, our objective for this business is to see an excess of 40% gross margins as we get into 2017 and the life science business is on track to support that.

Got it. But I mean, if I look at your June quarter, you are basically guiding to pretty steep ramp in revenues. So, in terms of your breakeven point, are you basically saying like, if I just analyze the June quarter revenues, the breakeven level for the business around $130 million, could that improve from there as we go forward?

Again, I think we are going to hold off before we describe too far into the future on this business. But as we aggregate the business and realize the customer synergy side that will determine a bit just how synergistic that profit equation is, but we are very optimistic on that.

Got it. And then, looking at your life sciences business, in the projections that you provided, it was very interesting that you broke it out between systems and what the recurring revenue is and what’s impressive of that, do you have a pretty – the bulk of the business is actually recurring, but what was little bit surprising in that is – that as I look at the growth projections, the recurring stream is actually growing for next few quarters pretty steadily. So with the recurring businesses I would have expected somewhat lower growth rates. So if you could just talk about like what’s the reason that the recurring business is increasing so fast for the next few quarters?

I’d say, Farhan, could you just clarify what stream you are asking about specifically?

So, if I look at your – the slide deck that you provided on your slide number nine, you had – in the life sciences, you had broken the service and consumables which is the recurring piece of the business. And if I look at that, that continues to grow steadily through the year much faster than what’s – it’s done like historically. So I just wanted to understand like why is there a growth projected in the recurring business as when I would have thought like recurring businesses are slow growth steady growth kind of businesses.

Yes, so, if you look at the chart, let me just point out the difference between Q1 and Q2, because in Q1, just as a reminder, we only had one month of the BioStorage. So you are getting a step-up in the services business around the storage, outsourced storage. And so from there, I think if you look from Q2 forward, what you are seeing is a little more growth or balanced growth on both sides, really you are getting the growth in the tail-end of the year from the twin banks on the top part of the chart and on the bottom part, you are getting continued growth from the – both the bookings that supports as we said 20% growth in BioStorage as well as we are still expanding the consumables with the decks in the investment stream. So, we don’t – when we say that that’s a steady business, we think it’s a steady business that’s repeatable with growth and then each time we add a customer, that’s a very sticky retention on that base part of the business. That’s what we like about that.

Got it. And then, one quick clarification on the CCS revenues. Obviously, the revenues are pretty lumpy like September quarter, they were $17 million, down to about $8 million in the December quarter. And you talk about growth in the March quarter. I just wanted to understand how much of the growth in the products business is coming from CCS versus your other products? And is the CCS business going back to the September level or it’s somewhere in between your December and September?

Hi, Farhan, So, the CCS business is growing. It’s between September and December. The advanced packaging back-end is also growing. And so, all of the areas are contributing, the front-end is growing as well.

Got it. Thank you. That’s all I had.

Okay, thanks, Farhan.

Mr. Robertson, there are no further questions at this time. I will turn the call back to you.

All right. Thank you, Cersei and thank everyone for your interest and your time with us today at Brooks Automation. We really look forward to speaking with you when we report the results from our fiscal 2016 second quarter. Thank you again.

Ladies and gentlemen, that does conclude the conference call for today. We thank you for your participation and ask that you please disconnect your lines.