Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. Welcome to Axalta's Second Quarter 2023 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] A question-and-answer session will follow the presentation by the management. Today's call is being recorded, and a replay will be available through August 9. Those listening after today's call should please note that the information provided in the recording will not be updated, and therefore, may no longer be current. I will now turn the call over to Chris Evans. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, and good morning. This is Chris Evans, VP of Investor Relations. We appreciate your continued interest in Axalta and welcome you to our second quarter 2023 financial results conference call. Joining me today are Chris Villavarayan, CEO and President; and Sean Lannon, CFO. Yesterday afternoon, we released our quarterly financial results and posted a slide presentation to the Investor Relations section of our website at axalta.com, which we will be referencing during this call. Our prepared remarks, the slide presentation and our discussion today may contain forward-looking statements, reflecting the company's current view of future events and their potential effect on Axalta's operating and financial performance. These statements involve uncertainties and risks, and actual results may differ materially from those forward-looking statements. Please note that the company is under no obligation to provide updates to these forward-looking statements. Our remarks and the slide presentation also contain various non-GAAP financial measures. In the appendix of the slide presentation, we've included reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures. For additional information regarding forward-looking statements and non-GAAP financial measures, please refer to our filings with the SEC. I will now turn the call over to Chris.

Thank you, Chris. I would like to welcome everyone to our second quarter 2023 earnings call. Let me begin by thanking Sean for his decade of service to Axalta. As you're aware, we recently announced that he is leaving the company to pursue another opportunity. Sean has had many notable accomplishments during his time with the company and was instrumental in building the foundation of an exceptional finance organization. I'm especially grateful for his partnership during my first seven months as CEO of Axalta. On behalf of the entire Board, thank you, Sean. We wish you well in the future. Effective August 14, Carl Anderson will be joining Axalta as our new Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Carl was most recently CFO at XPO, one of North America's largest freight transportation providers. Prior to that, he and I worked closely together at Meritor, where he also served as the CFO for more than three years following other key leadership roles in finance, treasury, tax, investor relations during his 16 years with the company. Carl has decades of corporate strategy and financial leadership experience in the global industrial and automotive sectors. As we strive to grow shareholder value at Axalta, Carl's background leading a finance organization through a strategic transformation and his track record as a true partner to the business leaders will be invaluable. We look forward to him joining us mid-August and appreciate that Sean will be staying a few weeks to ensure a seamless transition. In addition, we're delighted to welcome Kevin Stein to the Axalta Board effective September 1. Kevin has served as the CEO of TransDigm Group, a leading global designer, producer and supplier of highly engineered aircraft components since 2018. He brings a wealth of experience leading global industrial businesses and holds the…

Thank you, Chris, and good morning. Second quarter constant currency net sales increased 5% year-over-year to $1.3 billion. Adjusted EBIT improved to $155 million from $151 million in the prior year period, inclusive of $15 million in headwinds associated with consulting and ERP-related costs in the quarter. Underlying earnings growth was driven by better price mix in addition to the lower raw material, energy and transportation unit rates. This quarter marks the first deflationary benefit we have recognized since incurring nearly $650 million of variable cost inflation through 2021 and 2022, representing an approximate 40% increase over this period. Variable costs declined 5% year-over-year in the second quarter with epoxies and isocyanates being the largest categories of drivers of the improvement. Market prices for most import categories are now trending favorably from historically high levels at year-end. We are also encouraged by early success in accelerating our cost recovery efforts due to the launch of our purchasing optimization program earlier this year, which we are clearly now seeing and what we are procuring today. The better variable cost environment in the quarter was offset by $9 million in realized foreign exchange losses in the quarter as well as higher compensation expense driven by variable incentive compensation, labor inflation and stock-based compensation expense due to the expected profit improvements in 2023. We are thoughtfully managing these increased costs and expect to largely offset their impacts over time through our ongoing productivity enhancement programs. The cost of our productivity programs and the expenses related to the North American ERP implementation, as noted earlier, also drove $15 million of temporary spending in the period, in line with our second quarter guidance provided back in May. I will now cover Performance Coatings results on Slide 11. Performance Coatings second quarter net sales were flat…

Thanks again, Sean, for a decade of commitment to Axalta. Moving to Slide 14 to review our Q3 and 2023 guidance. Third quarter adjusted EBIT is expected to be between $160 million to $175 million or $230 million to $245 million in adjusted EBITDA. For the full year 2023, we expect adjusted EBIT to be approximately $630 million to $650 million, corresponding to adjusted EBITDA of $910 million to $930 million, inclusive of $15 million in consulting costs incurred in Q2, which will amount to 13% increase over the 2022 at the midpoint. This reflects an EBITDA level we have not seen since 2019 and an improved earnings run rate entering 2024. Our full year guidance framework assumes a mid-single-digit price mix benefit for the full year, which implies a low single-digit exit rate in Q4. Typical seasonal demand patterns are expected in the second half but volume for the year is fairly flat with mobility recovery offsetting industrial softness. This view does not currently contemplate fully addressing elevated backlogs and raw material procurement is trending favorably. We expect to realize a mid- to high single-digit percent benefit in our variable costs for the second half of the year, which should provide a boost to margins and help mitigate elevated operating expenses. We are increasing our full year 2023 free cash flow guide to $385 million to $425 million from $350 million, following a stronger pace of working capital release than was previously expected as well as a slightly lower CapEx forecast as we focus on capital allocation prioritization. I'm encouraged on how 2023 is shaping up. We are well on our way to returning to pre-pandemic levels with a path to unlock even more earnings power in the quarters to come. I'm proud of our global team for their focused execution and commitment they have demonstrated through the first half. Axalta's potential is robust, given our market leadership positions, growth platform, talent and technology, all of which, I believe, will not only support but drive long-term growth and profitability. Sean and I will be pleased to answer your questions. Operator, please open the lines for Q&A.

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Christopher Parkinson with Mizuho Securities.

Just given everything that's going on in the 3Q guide and with FX, some carryover pricing trends in the marketplace, it obviously implies a fairly decent hit on volumes. And can you help us just kind of think about what we should be seeing on a segment level in the third quarter, what actually flows into that? Presumably some of that's the ERP. And probably just as importantly, how to bridge that with your 4Q expectations just given the annual guide? Any color on that would be very helpful.

Chris, it's Sean. Maybe I'll start here. So from a volume perspective, we're actually expecting third quarter to be somewhat similar to the second quarter. We're not baking in any sort of broader recovery as far as bringing the backlogs down. We're not expecting them to get any worse, and certainly, that could provide a little bit of upside if we're able to close that gap. But when you think about volume and pricing, it should look relatively stable opposite the second quarter. We'll certainly start to see a little bit more benefit from a [COGS] perspective, again we’re probably a little bit conservative just given some of the priorities around bringing down working capital. We're certainly not procuring as much from a raw material perspective as we have historically given the prioritization there. And then just the lower dollar inventory actually working its way through the balance sheet, that's part of the reason why you're not seeing a bigger margin uptick in the third quarter. And then it's a similar cadence into the fourth quarter. Again, there's probably a little bit of upside if we're able to close the gap. Internally, we're certainly focused on closing that backlog gap. And again, that would probably get us to the higher end of the range that we provided on the guidance slide.

Maybe just picking up from Sean, and I'll break it down into each of the individual three businesses. So obviously, Mobility with the seasonality of the Europe and North American shutdowns, the two weeks in July, plus the standard July, August shutdowns in mobility. So you do see a little bit of that softness that we have baked into the forecast. Industrial we, as Sean put, we have actually looked at it being flat with what we have in Q2. And again, the real story here is in Refinish. And what we do have is we have the backlog being resolved by Q4, and we're giving ourselves time, obviously, with the impact that we had with our plant on the Refinish side. But any work that we do in improving that does provide us upside into Q4.

Just if we could just dig in very, very quickly on just the refinish trend. I mean, if we kind of do the very quick back-of-envelope math on the ERP hit of what you publicized in your press release and look at that versus the volume decline in the second quarter, for what -- is there anything else going on there? Because I think obviously, presumably, it seems like everything is going very well. It seems like you're gaining changes with the SMOs, top 10s as well as a lot of the tail. Is there anything else that you think investors should be paying attention to? I mean, it seems things are going pretty well with Irus and the launch there in Europe. But just anything else we should be monitoring into 2024 would be very, very helpful.

Sure, Chris. And maybe I'll -- absolutely, the story is very, very strong. And if you look at it purely from a volume perspective and look at that 8%, a portion of that is some volume compared last year that we exited some low-margin business in LatAm. The rest of it is all associated with our ERP launch specific to the North American impact. And so any resolution that we have there over the next two quarters essentially shows stable growth -- stable and growth in that business. And to your point, Irus will do nothing but help us enhance and grow the business going forward. So yes, with the exception in Q2 and Q3 of our decision to exit some low-margin business in LatAm, everything else is just the impact from the ERP launch.

And Chris, just to add on, I mean, we're still expecting record profitability in 2023 for Refinish. We still have a lot of the underlying tailwinds as we think about market recovery both in North America as well as Europe. You still see WIP at the body shop level at all-time highs as well as occupancy rates essentially stalled at roughly 50% North America. So we continue to see upside. But we're going to bring down this backlog over time. And I think what we saw in the second quarter was stability around demand. So we're really happy with how that business is performing, and the expectations are extremely high as we move forward.

Our next question comes from John McNulty with BMO Capital Markets.

Sean, thanks for all the help over all the years. Just wanted to dig a little bit more, Chris, you spoke to -- when you first came in -- I guess, on the last quarter call, you spoke to price recovery, raws productivity, supply chain optimization, et cetera. I guess now that you've been there for, call it, six, seven months or so, I guess, can you help us to frame a little bit in terms of how you're thinking about the upside or margin opportunity, maybe how you're thinking about 2024, if you're comfortable kind of giving that kind of color at this point as to how you're thinking about some of the improvements that you can see coming out over the next, say, 12 months or so?

Yes, that's a great question. I mean, I think if you look at our Q2, we had good performance in the quarter, which was just unfavorably impacted by our ERP launches that was primarily around 1 plant. And if you take that out, our guidance puts us on record earnings levels despite our investments in enterprise programs and obviously some elevated compensation spend comparing this year to last year. And if you talk about all those positive catalysts, price-mix, as we talk about this quarter is up 7%. Price-cost improvements continues to track well. And again, we do see as we head into Q3 and Q4, pricing will be a little bit more muted. As we started the year, we had about $120 million of cume price-cost gap across two of our businesses, about 60% of that resolved across the Mobility and Industrial business, and we expect to have that solved through the year. And then talking about additional positive catalyst, specialty raws. With the exception of specialty raws like TiO2, the raw material benefit, as Sean talked about, continues to track well for the second half and we do see that being a positive tailwind into Q4. And so when you take all that, and I think if you take a look at our Q4 guide, to what we built, even with the guide we had without the upside of solving the backlog in the Refinish side, it puts us at a midpoint at 243. And at the high point, what you will get is the second best quarter in the history -- the 10-year history of Axalta in terms of a Q4 performance. Usually, we see Q4 coming down. And if you take the top end of that guide, it essentially puts you as the best performance Axalta has seen, with the exception of 2020 where we've obviously had to take some actions to get there. So it just talks to the underlying performance that exists in the company, obviously, once we get past these operational issues that I do believe we will have more than solved over the next two quarters.

Got it. That's helpful color. And then maybe just a second one. You mentioned some mix issues in the auto OEM area and admittedly that the price mix was a little bit lower than, I guess, what we were looking for. It sounds like the pricing is actually pretty solid, and it was really just a mix issue. Can you just give us a little bit of color on -- and set that out a little bit?

Yes, John, I wouldn't characterize it as an issue. It just happened that we sold a little bit more volume in a particular layer that has a lower price point. It's not anything structural as far as changes from a mix perspective, but it was about a 2% headwind when you think about price-mix. But nothing to be worried about on that front.

Our next question comes from Josh Spector with UBS.

This is Lucas filling on for Josh. I just wanted to get back to the sequential assumptions in your 3Q earnings guidance and the bridge there. So we have the help from the lower raw materials. We've got the impact of the ERP and the consultant investments rolling off and then the impact of the lost volumes catching up. So each of those three buckets might be about $15 million each, so we've got a $45 million sequential improvement overall. So normally, your seasonality is a sort of $15 million to $20 million step-down, so that's like a $25 million to $30 million sequential benefit. So -- but your guidance is only up kind of $10 million to $15 million. So I'm just sort of wondering what are the other offsets there that I'm kind of missing in the bridge?

Yes. Lucas, we are not currently contemplating bringing that in the backlog in the third quarter. This is what I hit on earlier. That's potentially upside, but right now that's not baked into our guidance. So when you think about pricing, it's going to be stable from the second quarter to third quarter. From a volume perspective, we're expecting stability across all the end markets. Light vehicle is just the one call-out, and you'll see it in some of the industry forecast. Europe is just typically down, and we're expecting -- China just had a fantastic June, and industry forecasters are expecting a little bit of a pullback just seasonally. And then, yes, to your point, there will be a benefit from the consulting cost. They don't entirely go away but the majority will go away. And then we'll see a little bit more of a COGS step up and that's essentially a bridge.

Great. And then just on Mobility. So I was just wondering here if you could help us understand sort of why earnings didn't kind of sequentially improve into the second quarter. So shouldn't there have been some benefit flowing through from lower raws in the quarter? And what are you thinking in terms of margins implied in the third quarter guide?

Yes. So again, we tried to cover some of the underlying -- or the overview of remarks. But there was about a $5 million headwind as far as the consulting and ERP spending from an enterprise perspective that got allocated to Mobility. So that $24 million in EBIT becomes $29 million. And certainly, year-over-year, we are seeing some variable incentive comp headwinds as well as stock-based compensation, which is impacting margins from a year-over-year perspective.

And maybe, Lucas, just staying on Mobility for a bit and just -- I view this as a great story as we look heading into '24. And I just want to jump off maybe to Sean's comments here. If you look at a $24 million EBIT for the quarter and you tack on the $5 million, you pretty much have a run rate, you can essentially annualize that and it puts you north of $100 million as we look at the full year for '22. And if you take that in perspective and look at a very good year of 2019, we were about $140 million of the EBIT with $89 million builds. So we are about $3 million builds lower. And as we see the strength in the auto market driven by, let's call it, the demand forecast, not only from our customers but where IHS is going, it provides a good potential for prolonged upside case as we head into '24. And also on the heavy side, we're seeing about seven months of backlog. So certainly something that you can see that the business is really well on track to double-digit EBITDA here. The teams are doing a great job outpacing the market as well as our peers here.

Our next question is from Aleksey Yefremov with KeyBanc Capital Markets.

So your implied fourth quarter EBITDA guidance was about $242 million. How should we think about this as a base for 2024? So does this 4Q include the majority of your price-cost benefit? And where do you think there's additional margin opportunity in 2024? And also, is there a volume opportunity next year?

Yes. Aleksey, I mean, at the high end, it would imply about $252 million EBITDA contribution in the fourth quarter. When you think about the price-cost dynamics, regardless of inflation or deflationary environment, we'll continue to push price within Refinish. I mean, that's an area where we continue to innovate and provide value to customers, and we look to push through price. Some of the other businesses, as Chris mentioned, we are largely catching up and expect to be caught up by the end of the year. There could be some marginal pricing. It just depends on the pace of deflation. The bigger benefit really is expected from a run rate perspective around deflation. So today, where we're procuring inventories, we're probably down low double digits. As far as the back half of the year, we're expecting mid- to high single digits as far as the benefit in the P&L. So that will continue to unwind and provide potential margin upside as we round the corner into 2024.

And maybe -- we have talked about consulting, and obviously, there are three elements of the consulting spend. The one obviously was specific to the ERP project and support that it provided our [IS] folks. But on top of that, we have efficiency projects, one focused on reducing our inventory, which is how we were able to increase our working capital guide for the year as well as drive about $90 million in reduced inventory. But the next one here, Aleksey, is a purchasing initiative that will favorably impact our material performance beyond just the indexing, which we expect to see a better -- the drop-through after the inventory flow through to hit the P&L somewhere in Q4 and prepare us for 2024 as well.

Related to this, I guess by my estimate, you'd be spending somewhere around $45 million this year on ERP and other consulting costs, right? $15 million in the second quarter and perhaps $10 million per quarter in the -- or so in the back half. How do you think all these costs all-in compare in 2024 versus 2023?

Well, I think if you total what we have, it's about $30 million. And what we are saying, $15 million is obviously associated with our ERP launch. And Aleksey, simply put this was a 25-year-old system, legacy system that needed change. This essentially takes six ERP systems globally and puts it into one. It's four years in the making, and it's certainly something that we need to be able to manage our systems and essentially have the ability not only to have pricing but also operational and supply chain intelligence. So again, this was a project that had over 300 folks working on it, impacted 1,100 employees and impacted 11 plants and a multitude of distribution centers. And we went through this, obviously had the impact at one plant, but it had a banner launch at all the other sites. So obviously, very little in terms of payback from that. However, on the $15 million of additional expense on consulting, this was really to prepare ourselves for the back end of this year and really get us ready for '24. And all of these have less than a two-year payback.

Our next question comes from Duffy Fisher with Goldman Sachs.

If we could, I mean, I'm just looking at your margins, both what you've done this year. So 16.6% -- and this is EBITDA margin, 16.6% in Q1, 17.5% in Q2. The midpoint of your guide for Q3 is 18.4%. So basically, you're stepping up almost 1% per quarter sequentially. But then the implied guide when you get to Q4 is for a 17.8% EBITDA margin. And with raw materials kind of falling throughout the year, and they're trending down as we speak, why wouldn't Q4 with its increased revenue sequentially from Q3 continue that trend of improving margin?

Duffy, you're seeing the dynamic in the fourth quarter just seasonally with some of our end markets dropping off with the holiday month in December.

But I guess I'd push back on that because your sales are up $100 million at the midpoint from Q3 to Q4. So some things may be falling off. But what you're saying is actually the company is still growing nicely, 5% sequentially. So something in there doesn't triangulate.

Duffy, I'll point to -- there's certainly opportunity from a margin perspective, focused on the procurement side as well as closing the backlog. And if you look at the upper end of the fourth quarter being $252 million EBITDA and potentially providing upside if some of the other aspects come to fruition, there certainly could be upside from a margin perspective.

Okay. And then just because I'm getting pinged quite a bit on Bloomberg, there still seems to be some confusion around the sequential revenue build, and maybe we can attack it kind of year-over-year. So in your guide, you're up 0% to 2% year-over-year in Q2 on revenue excluding FX. And price should still -- price-mix should still be a pretty significant benefit, I would think. So that would imply year-over-year Q3 volumes may be down 2-ish percent. So one, could you help with that? And then if that's the case, kind of where will we see it? But then it seems like again with that bigger revenue number in Q4, we start growing volume kind of low single digits in Q4. What improves in that number from Q3 to Q4, in your mind?

So the Q2 to Q3 guide, I think we covered this, but it's Industrial and Refinish are largely flat. And then Mobility, you're seeing a slight pullback just given the European and China dynamic. And then from Q3 to Q4, you are seeing a slight uptick as it relates to Industrial volumes and a little bit in Mobility just as it seasonally recovers from Q3 to Q4.

Our next question comes from Vincent Andrews with Morgan Stanley.

Just wondering, with the issues with the ERP implementation in the second quarter, do you have to provide any terms or make holes or anything for customers in order to maintain that backlog in the North American market? And/or are you baking in any conservatism into the back half of the year for any further ERP implementation issues?

Yes. So I'll take that, and good morning and thanks for the call, Vincent. So yes, we are in terms of having some cushion. And let me just walk through it. Again, the primary impact of our ERP launch was specific to our Refinish business. And what we did here was obviously -- we launched on May 1, and May was a tough month across our Refinish business associated with our plant in Virginia. However, just to put it in perspective, the teams across the globe rallied in June. And we had -- if you put Axalta into perspective, Axalta has been around for 10 years, just over 10 years. In 123 months, we had the second best month in the history of the company from a sales, EBITDA and a margin performance. So it just talks to the foundation and what the teams were able to rally back and accomplish in the month of June coming out of our issues in May. And so as we built our forecast for Q3 and Q4, we did have a backlog. Obviously, as you know, there is a pickup in Q3 for Refinish. So on top of that, we have the backlog. And what we have done in our forecast is provide the ability for us over two quarters to be able to bring down -- normalize that backlog, but the benefit of that is not in our forecast. So all that said, in terms of the loss of customers, as you are aware, this is the Refinish business. And we believe we can hold these customers. We don't have the issue of destocking that you might have heard from others. What we have here is what we have done is obviously reduce our inventory levels at our distributors that are -- through the channel. And what we're doing is replenishing that as well as making sure that we deliver to our customers what they need. So that's exactly what we're focused on over the next two quarters.

And just as a follow-up. SG&A is up $30 million. Can you just help me understand the components of that are? Is the consultant spending in there? Is some of that investment spending? Or just sort of what's the bridge there? And how should it play out over the balance of the year?

Yes. The vast majority of the increase relates to incentive compensation. Last year, we tracked well below our target from a budget perspective. Global incentive comp ranged around 70% of the payoff. We're tracking above the incentive comps this year. So that's really the vast majority of the headwind from an SG&A perspective.

Our next question comes from David Begleiter with Deutsche Bank.

This is Anthony Mercandetti on for David. Just back on the ERP. Can you quantify the benefits that you're expecting to realize by Q4 and then how we should think about this flowing through the P&L in 2024?

Yes. So we'll be providing the benefits with the ERP launch as part of the 2024 guide. We expect limited benefit other than the absence of the cost that we incurred in the second quarter as it relates to third quarter and fourth quarter. Right now, it's the focus on continued stability at our plants. But then we'll quickly turn to value realization. As part of this ERP implementation, we redid our integrated business planning. We put in new pricing tools. And obviously, we get a lot more visibility into transactions and working capital that we expect to benefit in 2024. But again, we'll provide more guidance when we're out with the 2024 guidance I am sure.

Understood. And then as other geographies roll out, their own ERP implementations, do you expect similar, I guess, operational hurdles and cost that we saw in North America? Or is this process more streamlined since it's been done already?

Well, that's a great question. One of the things that we are doing is going to take a bit of a pause for about a year and get launched with other regions such as Asia and LatAm and then start with Europe, which would be the next launch, a large region. So we're going to probably take this over the next two to three years. And obviously, big lessons learned that we have from here as well for us. But again, as I said, when you consider the scope, scale and magnitude of the project, I am pleased with the implementation. And so there are some lessons learned on warehouse management and shipping management that we will take and apply as we go forward in future launches.

Got it. And just to be clear, so Europe would be the next large launch when that time does come, followed by Asia and LatAm?

No, no, no. The next two launches will be Asia and LatAm. Europe will be last.

Our next question comes from Ghansham Panjabi with Baird.

This is actually Matt Krueger sitting in for Ghansham. So given the major shift in pricing over the last couple of years now, transitioning to a more favorable raw material sourcing environment, can you talk a bit about what you're seeing from a competitive backdrop perspective? Maybe highlighting any key gains by end market or region as well as where you may be facing some comparatively stiffer competition?

Sure. Maybe I'll start, and I'll turn this over to Sean. But as I look at price-mix, as a company, as we said in our prepared remarks, we were able to do 7%. And I think the teams have done a stellar job, 10% in Refinish, 7% in Industrial even with the volumes going down 15%. And in Mobility, even with the 2% headwind we did 3%. So overall, as a company, we've accomplished 7% and shows the continued focus on driving both price and cost. It is becoming more muted in the back half, and let me talk to it in this sense. We started the year with about $120 million of cume price-cost negative, specifically in two out of our four end markets, light vehicle and industrial. And the teams have done a stellar job with more than half of that being resolved as we sit here today. And my expectation is by the end of the year and starting into 2024, most -- all of that will get resolved. So we will -- pricing will become more muted as we have stabilized and -- especially loans, we also start seeing the benefits of the raw material deflation. So far, we've obviously had some pushback with customers, but again, the performance of the business indicates how well this has been sticking.

Great. That's very helpful. And then your earnings release and presentation is fairly unique in that it doesn't reference destocking at all. It may be the first release that I've seen like this throughout the reporting period. Can you provide some details on any potential impact from supply chain destocking across the business during the quarter? And if there wasn't an impact, why is Axalta's business so uniquely immune at this point?

So Matt, I mean, we just don't go through distribution, and most of our customers are just not holding as much Refinish, keeping that aside, we actually destocked in North America within distribution just because of the ERP element. So that certainly provides some upside for us. Where we saw some marginal destocking was really within building products in North America. And so you saw the 15% pullback within Industrial. Building products was really a core driver to that. Certainly, building products market weakness, but there was some element of destocking. Again, it's just not as pervasive of an issue for us and why we're not calling it out.

Our next question comes from John Roberts with Credit Suisse.

Best wishes Sean, and welcome, Carl and Kevin, if you're listening in. I believe Axalta sells coatings for auto OEM parts that are painted off-line and then shipped to OEMs. Does that part of the business serves as a leading indicator for the OEM business? And what are you seeing in the parts business?

Well, overall, John, we're seeing very, very strong demand across the light vehicle business. I mean, we're exceeding initial demand forecast. As you can see, IHS keeps ratcheting it up a bit, a bit, a bit. We're up at 86.7 million builds right now. And on top of that, all the -- preparing for this, all the initial checks that we've done with the customers also shows a very strong underlying demand. And on top of the fact that the aged auto fleet and the fact that we had four years of underbuilding is creating, what I would call, is a mid to -- a short to midterm upside case. And then on the heavy side truck, backlogs remain incredibly strong. Again, doing some customer checks, what we're seeing is that our customers, even with record outputs, are sitting with almost seven months in backlog. So both businesses do look very strong. On the heavy side, there is some concern in '24 of a possible softness from some folks. But certainly, we're not seeing it at this point.

Our next question comes from Kevin McCarthy with Vertical Research Partners.

In your Mobility segment, you've talked in the past about commercial courage and an effort to restore margins. So my question would be at this juncture of the cycle where we have raw material costs coming down sharply, in some cases, do you think you can continue to move price higher on a sequential basis in Mobility exclusive of mix? Or does that become impractical based on your recent customer experiences?

What we're seeing right now is -- so I would say the pricing on Mobility, especially, I believe, on the light vehicle side, started off pretty slow. And as you -- as we rewind the clock 1 year, 1.5 years ago, the most significant, let's call it, price-cost cume negative was sitting in our Mobility business. As we sit today, we still have the largest price-cost cume gap sitting in Mobility. The teams are doing a great job trying to resolve that, working with our customers. And as I look at the second half of the year, we do see that becoming more muted. We are starting to essentially get to a point that as the costs come down, the price-cost cume gap is also starting to level out. So we do believe that it will get more muted. But overall, our customers understand that we need to invest in this business. There is absolutely significant amounts of investment, especially on the light vehicle mobility side that we have to keep doing to keep ahead in terms of the product requirements for our customers. So certainly, it has been a long discussion, but I believe we're in the right spot. And as prices come down here, we are starting to mute those discussions going forward.

Yes. And just maybe to add, roughly 40% of those contracts are on indexation. So you'll see some price give back, but you should continue to see variable margin improvement as we're seeing the deflationary benefits. The team is very focused. Still -- we're still 40 to 50 behind at the end of Q2 from a price-cost gap. So the team is continuing to drive. It's just a lot more selective, looking OEM by OEM, region by region. So I do think there's continued opportunity as the team continues to execute on margin recovery.

Okay. And secondly, how would you compare Irus to your existing Daisy Wheel product and also your competitors' Moonwalk product? Is it essentially Daisy Wheel 2.0 or something that's more of a step function change? And are there financial implications we should be thinking about as you ramp up in Europe and elsewhere in terms of providing the equipment and those sorts of considerations on margins, for example?

I absolutely love that question. So if it's 2.0 or 3.0, I look at it as just an absolute game changer. It's -- Irus is next-level technology. It's a fully automated match-and-mix system that I believe sets us apart from our peers. As you're aware, in the Refinish space, this is an absolute necessity and a table stake as you play in this space. And I believe this process advancement really differentiates us from -- differentiates the Refinish business and our extraordinary team of people that work here. It's really special because it's the only fully automated machine that I believe is faster than anything in the market. And I'll give you a couple of data points here in terms of benefit to our customers. Obviously, even starting with our existing customers, this is less than a year's payback on this product for them. And if we move from that to sustainability, this uses Axalta's own bottles, which is made from 50% recycled plastic. And in this sense, on just our customers within a year, we've reduced about 400 tons of plastic that goes into landfills. And then on top of that, in just our launch in Europe, to what you mentioned, our customer feedback has just been incredibly tremendous. In my first seven months and just spending time with the team and spending time in Europe listening to customers, this has just been absolutely great feedback and see this as our next evolution on how we grow this business going into next year.

Thank you. There are no further questions at this time. Thank you so much for your participation. This concludes today's teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time.