Good day ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Third Quarter 2008 AXIS Capital Holdings Limited Earnings Conference Call. My name is Erica and I will be your coordinator for today. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. We will be facilitating a question-and-answer session towards the end of this conference. [Operator Instructions]. I would now like to turn the presentation over to your host for today's call, Ms. Linda Ventresca Director of Investor Relations. Please proceed.

Thank you, Erica and good morning ladies and gentlemen. I am happy to welcome you to our conference call to discuss the financial results for AXIS Capital for the quarter ended September 30, 2008.Our third quarter earnings press release and financial supplement were issued yesterday evening after the market closed. If you would like copies, please visit the Investor Information section of our website, www.axiscapital.com. We set aside an hour for today's call, which is also available as an audio webcast through the Investor Information section of our website through November 21st. An audio replay will also be available through November 7th. The toll-free dial-in number for the replay is 888-286-8010 and the international number is 617-801-6888. The pass code for both replay dial-in numbers is 21842480. With me on today's call are John Charman, our CEO and President and David Greenfield, our CFO. Before I turn the call over to John, I will remind everyone that statements made during this call including the Q&A session which are not historical facts, maybe forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. Federal Securities Laws. Forward-looking statements contained in this presentation include, but are not necessarily limited to information regarding our estimate of losses related to catastrophes and other loss events, general economic, capital and credit market conditions, future growth prospects and financial results, evaluation of losses and loss reserves, investment strategies, investment portfolio and market performance, impact of the marketplace with respect to changes and pricing models and our expectations regarding pricing and other market conditions. These statements involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions, which could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations. For a discussion of these matters, please refer to the Risk Factor section in our most recent Form 10-K on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. In addition, this presentation contains information regarding operating income, which is a non-GAAP financial measure within the meaning of the U.S. Federal Securities Laws. For a reconciliation of this item to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, please refer to our press release and Form 8-K issued last night which can be found on our website. With that, I would like to turn the call over to John.

Thank you Linda and good morning everyone. As you know during this quarter, the world's financial markets and industry and we at Axis have experienced an unprecedented confluence of events. All these unprecedented events were adverse with respect to financial results for the quarter including our results. More importantly, our view is that these events have acted as a catalyst eroding in a cluster board hardening throughout the P&C marketplace. The Hurricane activity in the quarter served as a healthy reminder of the significant risk borne in U.S. coastal regions, as well as a significant claims paying ability of the property and cash in the marketplace. Hurricane Ike now looks to have the potential to be third the largest hurricane on record, in terms of market loss. Even in the face of this unprecedented confluence of events, our industry has demonstrated remarkable resilience. Meanwhile, financial markets have experienced significant and unprecedented volatility and liquidity. This is a transformational time and serves as an eye opener to the reality of capital and liquidity. It represents the first time since the 1930's that it is been a total collapse of confidence in the major international banking system. This in turn fuel significant concern about a major world recession lead by the U.S. and other industrial countries. Fortunately, unlike the 1930's, governments and central banks remain active in stabilizing the situation. Finally, our major and most aggressive competitor has suffered significant weakness. This competitor who historically has had significant influence deployed substantial capacity and as part of its culture demonstrated extreme pricing competition across all of our product lines, is now so severely distressed as to require massive government financial and management assistance. This situation in isolation is an after cause of positive change throughout our markets and products. Against the back drop…

Thank you John and good morning everyone. As John mentioned, the extraordinary events which have unfolded that have significant impact on our financial results this quarter, but our capital resources and liquidity position remained very strong. This positions us extremely well to benefit from the market turn we expect will commence across short tail lines at the January 1st, renewal date. Our net loss for the quarter was $249 million or $1.79 per diluted share, compared with net income of $270 million or $1.65 per diluted share to the third quarter of 2007. This quarter's results included $407 million of estimated net losses from Hurricanes Gustav and Ike. When considering the associated earned premium impact, the overall after tax impact of these hurricanes on the quarter's results was $371 million. Net after tax catastrophe losses in the third quarter of 2007 were $34 million. Absent CAD events in both periods, operating income was $210 million in this year's third quarter compared to $307 million in last year's third quarter. John has already shared with you the headline news with respect to the financial markets. And we were not immune to the impact of these events on our investment portfolio. Net realized losses in the quarter were $89 million. Our after tax operating loss which excludes the impact of realized gains and losses on investments was a $161 million or $1.15 per diluted share compared with operating income of $271 million or $1.66 per diluted share for the third quarter of 2007. The net realized investment losses in the quarter included $50 million in other than temporary impairments on investment securities, largely relating to fixed income securities of Lehman Brothers. $60 million in losses from the sale of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac preferred equity securities and $23 million in net…

Thank you David. And I would like to begin with a brief review of current market conditions and move on to the infinitely more important future prospects for market conditions. As I mentioned when I started of the call, we expect a positive turn in the cycle across all lines of business, with the timing of this term bearing by line. Over the last two to three years, nearly all insurance business lines have been under extreme pricing pressure with only one notable exception. We continue to see improvement in the financial institutions classes within our professional lines business and for larger financial institutions availability of capacity has now become an issue. The balance of our professional lines business meanwhile has remained under pressure with the high access commercial business under the most severe pressure. Pricing for natural and catastrophe exposure in the insurance marketplace had reached marginal levels followed by the third quarter, particularly for California and the earthquake. Sub-prime and excess casualty market remained very soft, and in a state of flux. Downward pricing pressures remain consistently strong through the quarter. We expect for our determined actions over the last two years to materially reduce net risk in our insurance segments, at a time when cycle risk was increasing will serve as well. Needless to say there has been significant activity emerging from the AIG situation. But in our view, it will take a little time for all the dynamics influencing a positive pricing turn to work their way through the insurance market. In my view, AIG is the hay stack not to scroll the broker industry camels' back. Turning to the reinsurance market, as we have noted for sometime this market has remained relatively stable with moderating pressure experienced throughout most lines. Our reinsurance portfolio has been…

[Operator Instructions]. Our first question comes from the line of Matthew Heimermann with JPMorgan. Please proceed.

Hi good morning, everybody.

Good morning Matt.

Good morning Matt.

Hi. John, you said with near certainty you thought you'd get a pricing turn across; it seems like actually most of the industry. I guess what's the different between certainty and near certainty? Is that have to do with resolve of your competitors or is there something fundamental that could change, that would explain that small doubt there?

I am pretty comfortable about the market situation that we are moving towards in a relatively short period of time. And as I'd tried to say that some products will react much more quickly than others. But, the reality of it, of the market change is there.

All right. So, compensate just from a under the just restate just to make sure I got it, the near certainty just reflects the fact that there might be some lags, so you'll get lots of turnings somewhere lag that initial turn and that's the difference certainty in there?

As you know, Matt, there are businesses that have much less control over their underwriting operations that we have and it can take a little bit of time for those businesses to exert management influence save the underwriters. But undoubtedly it's there and its not far away.

Okay, that makes sense. The other, I have got two other quick ones, one is, there is obviously the distress in the financial markets has impaired some companies has... have you changed your appetite for M&A activity given some of the distress pricing you've seen out there or is with the prospect of our cycle turn your mindset and efforts exclusively focused on organic?

I think its fair to say that the with a potentially unique opportunity presenting itself now on the underwriting side, a market changing event so that we are more much more focused on organic growth. We believe that we can achieve significant incremental value for the foreseeable future.

Okay, that makes sense. And, then the last question I had, with on the political risk book. It seems... I am just trying to get a sense of how much of the pull back had did you with what's happening with the financial markets and kind of maybe the risk prospect changing versus with holding capacity for pending renewals as we go forward?

Primarily, it was the former, because that we've demonstrated time and time again, if you go back three years our withdrawal from the aviation market. We have now actually withdrawn from most parts of the marine market and this is no different from the way we run all of over underwriting activity. We have become increasingly conservative and concerned about what was taking place in the global financial markets and we were able to step back from that marketplace. It was very deliberate and you can see the evidence of portfolio with over a 60% reduction so.

The change in the financial markets in anyway change your comfort with the business you brought in up to this point. We haven't see that take it to zero, so there is still some business out there that you are comfortable with, but I just be curious.

We obviously very closely monitor our reinforce business; we are very happy with that. I have said time and time again, this is business that our group of people included myself have been underwriting for many, many years. It's a tight ended team, risk selection is critical, due diligence is critical, and we're comfortable with our in force portfolio. But, we do see, substantial opportunity in that line of business, probably emerging after the first quarter of next year.

Okay, excellent. Thank you very much.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from the line of Susan Spivak with Wachovia. Please proceed.

Hi, good morning, everyone.

Susan, good morning.

How are you? Thanks for the very detailed commentary John, its great. And I just want to follow up, I have the same questions as Matt about the certainty that, could you just give us an idea you mentioned sending your teams out to the conferences I am assuming you mean the PCI embodied with an idea of what massage to send across that rates are going higher. But what's the magnitude of the message that you are sending out given the increased cost of capital?

Well, I think you've summed it up to yourself, its not an increase cost of capital, we have to.... we take a lot of the ground that the industry has given away over the last two or three years and it's pretty well across the board. Some businesses take longer to arrive to the table than others but without a shatter of a down season, everybody has to move in a very different direction. And I've been very encouraged over the last few days that the statements are emerging from these recent conferences based from the insurance side and from the reinsurance side.

Have you ever John seen such a consensus amongst market leaders in anticipation of a cycle turn like this?

I think that this is a much broader and I'd say sustainable opportunity than 9/11.

Really. And with that being said how much more premium do you think you could right on your current capital base?

We have significant capacity. We have as I said we've been very patient and you know me, that's really tough. We've been very patient for two or three years. We have significant capacity and capital to do what's necessary, when is necessary and how is necessary.

Okay. That's great John thanks again for all the comments.

My pleasure. Thanks.

Our next question comes from the line of Vinay Misquith with Credit Suisse. Please proceed.

Hi, good morning.

Good morning Vinay.

John you seem suddenly more positive on the industry, what could go wrong with price increases here.... certainly most companies seem to be very positive so my question is that, what could go wrong and prices would stay flat? Thanks.

Its just not possible with the balance sheet within the industry, and we've been talking about market conditions soften and its softening and a rational competition over the last couple of years, that now must be feeding its way through into company's balance sheet with deteriorating financials and then if you look at the capital losses that the balance sheets are having to deal with. And the reality of the capital constraint that the industry has gained a very quickly find itself in, going into next year and for the near term future and near term is probably the next two to four years. So I just cannot see how the market cannot positively react both on the insurance side and on the re-insurance side, unless they are suicidal and they want to go out of business.

I recall about a year or two, you were marketing heavily with mutual companies, could you refresh my memory as to how much of business you actually wrote from them and do you see more opportunities from those mutual companies, on the re-insurance?

I think that we have, I haven't got the share about both side of the for mutual, but we have been marketing more heavily through the U.S. for the mutual's, that it will be very interesting that mutual's having a greater proportion of equities within their balance sheet investments. And to see the impact that has on those mutual's and to see whether I'm pretty sure that there's going to be in a boost in their reinsurance demand over the next two or three years and I think we're well placed because that's pretty sticky business. And we've been working hard over the last two or three years to establish relationships with them, convince them of our capital, convince them of our service capability and sustainability. So I would expect us to benefit very strongly from that position.

How about your ratings, put your single A rating. I thought you were just competitive with double AA ratings?

I would love to have a higher rating but at the end of the day, and if you are an A rated company in this day and age and you have a great reputation, you've got great capital, you've great people, you've got great market and you're diverse both globally on by product line. There is damn old difference between the double AA and A.

All right that's fair. Thank you.

Our next question comes from the line of Alain Karaoglan from Bank of America. Please proceed.

Good morning John.

Good morning Alain, how are you?

Fine, thank you, a couple of questions. So from your point of view, are you changing your return on capital requirements for business on average going forward. So next year, we're going to have a hard market. But is this whole uncertainly leading you to... we need more than a 15% now going forward or you're staying with your all goal?

That a number of different questions in that one question. The reality is that we will maintain the fact that regardless of market conditions, we expect to run a minimum of 15% over any cycle that you like to call. The reality is that we will be very demanding because we've had to be patient over the last two to three years. We will be very demanding in the returns that require in the near-term future and we expect to maximize whatever profitability that there is out there in the marketplace and still stay within acceptable risk tolerances for the business.

Okay. And in terms of... it seems that reinsurance is going to react first. The insurance business is a little bit later as companies come to risks with more with the situation. Are you... and in terms of the situation of AIG, isn't the risk in the short-term that they become more competitive in order to retain business and are you seeing that today in the market. They've always been extremely competitive historically, but are they being more competitive now in order to retain business and thus that hurt the market because of their situation it gives you opportunities?

Well let me just answer the point about the re-insurance market. I have not understood why the re-insurance market hasn't been better valued by the investment community. The outlook for the re-insurance market for the foreseeable future is more positive than I have seen for many, many years. I think the reality of the capital markets substantially withdrawing from providing capacity will lead to a re-energization of the reinsurance market place and a better understanding of what the reinsurance market provides to the insurance marketplace. And I believe that that will be witnessed over the next two or three years. As far is AIG are concerned, I shed no tears for them. I have been in the business for 37 years and I believe that any normalization of AIG and I'm not talking personally to the individuals. Any normalization of AIG will be very beneficial to the marketplace because it will release huge volumes of business throughout the insurance portfolios, both by product and by geography. So I don't want to jump on their grave but I do believe it's a very, very important and significant event so, I think its very positive in the marketplace.

Thank you, very much.

And you have mentioned about, sorry, you mentioned about near term disruption, yes of course, but the brokers are very careful in terms of making any market that is weakened forcing that market to complete even more aggressively on price risk renewal business, but without a shadow of a doubt new business will be steered away and is being steered away.

Thank you, John.

Our next question comes from the line of Jay Cohen, with Merrill lynch. Please proceed.

Yes. Thank you, a couple of questions.

Good morning, Jay.

First is on the political risks side, have you gotten any political risk claims, notices yet and if you could remind us, because I'm not an expert in political risk claims I got to tell you that, if you could remind us what kind of credit exposure do you have there, because if you read the description in your supplement, you do take, you are providing a corporate credit insurance, so could you just remind us what kind of risk you have there, that's the first question. And, then secondly have you been able to hire any teams or people out of AIG at this point and do you expect to?

As far as the political risk account is concerned. I didn't discuss individual losses. But we have had what I would consider to be minimal loss activity in our portfolio and we do not expect material loss activity in that book in our enforce book either. Now we monitored it on our daily basis. The portfolio itself is over 50% corporate credit, these are individual transactions. I have said to you before, we partner with a limited number of international banks. We do full due diligence along side the banking due diligence. That is strongly collateralized, and our banking partners have significant skill in the game and we are very diligent about our monitoring our exposure by industrial and country. And we correlate those industries both nationally and globally. And then second largest part of that portfolio is the confiscation and expropriation, nationalization and deprivation product and we have been very careful with the industries that we ensure within different countries around the world. We have embedded knowledge all the global, international countries and we are very mindful of staying clear of industries that are more likely to being nationalized than those that are not. And we have avoided the events within Venezuela and Bolivia specifically because of our proactive approach to this portfolio and it is absolutely critical and I just stress enough that the risk selection is critical in this portfolio, but we have had a settled team of the individuals here for over 10 years.

John you think you will see industry losses you mean you may not suffer where other suffer being in losses here?

I just had if a large loss that might be around in London a Brazilian loss, but we're not involved in, we declined it. And then secondly, I think when you're talking about the AIG personnel with regard to political risk or on a broader basis.

I was seeing it more broadly John?

Yes, we are always on the look out for some really good people. We always have been a we will continue to be to do so and we have had a reputation for finding good people individuals or groups of people where ever they come from and if we feel that they fit our culture and our ethos we'll bring them in.

No big hires yet I assume?

We don't have any people in the cross way between AIG and us.

Very good.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from the line of Josh Shanker with Citigroup. Please proceed.

Yes.

Good morning, Josh.

Good morning. This is one of the concerns and I am with hard market pieces, now one of the concerns there's been no real loss experience in the clone of our standard business. What are you prospecting will eventually come of the 2007, 2008 as for the years for the industry. And what do you expect exclusive of catastrophes, what 2009 hold before we took these price increases really impact our underwriting results?

Well, sorry. I am a bit confused. No, I can't predict what catastrophes are going to occur in 2009, but the reality is the market has to have significantly enhanced premium volumes on both the insurance side of the business and the reinsurance side to be able to deal with increased catastrophe numbers and risk losses to continue to be profitable. And that has to reset its pricing to make sure that there is a reasonable margin which is acceptable to our investors.

And trying to... ignoring for statutory losses for a second and stripping them out, what do you think the industries commercial property and casualty combined ratio is running out right now if pricing were to hold flat?

Well I've said to you many times, I've said to this audience many times that I've not understood why, with the breaching environments, substantial rating competition that has been throughout the insurance market close for the last two, two and half years. Why we haven't seen greater deterioration in the financials coming out of the underwriting side. I'm not going to predict what combined ratio is going to be, but I suspect they will be different from what companies currently expect.

And obviously you can't control other company's financials but you would expect ultimately that the 2008 or 2007 as for the industry would likely have unfavorable developments on it?

Well that was going to work its way through. As we've said before that if you look at the excessive competition, pricing competition not only the short tail lines but equally as importantly on the professional lines business as well as casualty business which we have stepped substantially back from during that period. That has to work its way through the system sooner or later.

Okay. And very good, well I appreciate that its a different question I understand but good luck from its real opportunity coming up.

Okay. We will certainly mindful from away. Thank you, Josh.

Our last question comes from the line of Tom Cholnoky with Goldman Sachs. Please proceed.

Good morning, John.

Good morning Tom.

I guess I have got its interesting as I listen to this conference call everybody is talking about the damage to the supply side of the equation and nobody seems to or at least nobody has addressed the issue that, you have grown in a period of a global slowdown and in a period of very low inflation. Is it conceivable that you could have better pricing, but not really much in the way of incremental premium volume growth, because exposures are actually declining or not growing, I guess that's the first question and the second...

And just hold on? Let me give thoughts on that...

Go ahead.

I think its sort of important question. I believe there will be a substantial increase in premium take across the globe and across product lines. Because, the markets have in my view substantially under priced, so many of the primary products and regardless of whether clients wish to pay or do not wish to pay. Historically, that price is at relatively low level. These are products that are absolutely necessary and but frankly one of the benefits that I see very clearly coming down the line, is actually again to come from the problems of the banking community currently have. The banks on their lending facilities, their lending covenants, they are not been enforcing, in my experience very much at all over the last three or four years. They've been turning up blind eye to the requirements that they have within those covenants for insurance purchasing, later lay into significant levels. I believe going forwards, the change in the risk appetite within banks and the identification of risks and the enforcement of those covenants is going to produce a great deal of new business or old business back into the market. And I've invested very, very positive step. So, I think both I have two comments. One is the fact that I believe that there will be a general increase in actual premium take and then secondly I think there'll be a boost to that by the way the banks are going to have to enforce their lending covenants.

But that's more for property, isn't it rather than causally?

Yes. But it's a pretty important amount.

I understand it, but I guess from a casualty perspective you got declining payroll, declining sales and most insurance premium are driven off of those types of exposures and I would think that the actual pick up....

We're heavily involved in casualty business and so that because you know it brings me out in spots most of the times.

Right.

But we have a casualty business, and an umbrella business which is a very good business. So we will incrementally benefit from the hardening of the marketplace because there will be a flat to quality back to people like us. So we'll have better earnings from the casualty side, more much better quality earnings, that all of other products, we will significantly benefit from.

Okay. And I guess just the last question I mean to the extent that do you think managements have been shake up enough that even if a lot of the unrealized gains that the industry has incurred today and if those start to reverse themselves over the next six to nine months. And capital gets rebuild back up. How much damage do you think really will have been done to the industry?

I think that the underwriting is damages is clear for all to say. And nobody can tell whether the volatility in the financial markets is going to reverse over the next six, 12, 36, five years. So, whether regulators, rating agencies, or managers of businesses have got to work on what they know and that's going to lead to this market changing event.

Okay, great. Thank you very much.

Great pleasure.

I would now like to turn the call over to John Charman, for closing remarks.

Well, thank you everybody for bearing with us during this typical third quarter. Market and I much look forward to a very changed report as we enter underwriting for next year. Thank you very much.

Thank you for your participation in today's conference. This concludes the presentation. Everyone have a great day. .