Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. Thank you for standing by. Welcome to the American States Water Company conference call discussing the company's First Quarter 2025 Results. The call is being recorded. If you would like to listen to the replay of the call, we'll begin this afternoon at 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time and run through May 15th on the company's Web site, www. aswater.com. The slides that the company will be referring to are also available on the website [Operator Instructions]. Presenting today from American States Water Company are Bob Sprowls, President and Chief Executive Officer; and Eva Tang, Senior Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer. As a reminder, certain matters discussed during this conference call may be forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees or assurances of any outcomes, financial results, levels of activity, performance and achievements and listeners are cautioned not to place undue reliance upon them. Forward-looking statements are subject to estimates and assumptions and known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors. Listeners should review the description of the company's risks and uncertainties that could affect the forward-looking statements in our most recent Form 10-K and Form 10-Q on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Statements made on this conference call speak only as of the date of this call. And except as required by law, the company does not undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement. In addition, this conference call will include a discussion of certain measures that are not prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, in the United States and constitute non-GAAP financial measures under SEC rules. These non-GAAP financial measures are derived from consolidated financial information that are not presented in our financial statements that are prepared in accordance with GAAP. For more details, please refer to the press release. At this time, I would like to turn the floor over to Bob Sprowls, President and Chief Executive Officer of American States Water Company.

Thank you, Jamie. Welcome, everyone, and thank you for joining us today. I'll begin with a brief discussion on the quarter. Eva will then discuss some financial details. And then I'll wrap it up with updates on regulatory activity, ASUS, dividends and then we'll take your questions. We started 2025 with strong financial results. Consolidated earnings per share for the first quarter were $0.08 higher compared to the same quarter in 2024. Favorable variance is attributable to the receipt of final decisions from the California Public Utilities Commission, or CPUC, in the water and electric general rate cases, which authorized new water rates for 2025 to 2027 and authorized new electric rates for 2023 to 2026. These favorable variances were partially offset by higher operating expenses, a $0.05 per share unfavorable variance from losses incurred on our investments to fund one of the company's retirement plans and the dilutive effects from the issuance of equity under American States Water's at-the-market offering program, which decreased consolidated earnings by $0.02 per share. Our regulated utilities are on pace to invest a combined $170 million to $210 million in infrastructure investments this year. With that, I will turn the call over to Eva to discuss earnings and liquidity.

Thank you, Rob. And hello, everyone. Let me start with our first quarter results. Recorded consolidated earnings were $0.70 per share for the quarter as compared to $0.62 per share for the first quarter of last year. For our water utility, Golden State Water reported earnings were $0.52 per share compared to $0.48 per share last year. The $0.04 per share increase in 2025 was largely due to the new 2025 water rates as a result of receiving a final decision in connection with Golden State Water's general rate case proceeding, partially offset by higher operating expenses and losses generated on investments held to fund a retirement plan as compared to gains during the same period in 2024 due to financial market conditions. Lastly, there was a decrease in earnings of $0.02 per share due to the dilutive effect from issuance of equity on the AWR's at-the-market offering program. Our Electric segment's earnings were $0.07 per share for the quarter as compared to $0.05 per share for the same quarter in 2024, a $0.02 per share increase, primarily due to receiving the final CPUC decisions on the electric general rate case with the new 2025 electric rates as compared to 2022 rates used to record revenues during the first quarter of 2024. Earnings from ASUS were $0.13 per share for the quarter, which was consistent with the same period in 2024, which Bob will discuss further. Lastly, losses from our parent company were $0.02 per share for the quarter when compared to losses of $0.03 in the same quarter due largely to a decrease in interest expense resulting from lower average interest rate and lower borrowing levels at AWR's credit facility. Consolidated revenues for the first quarter increased by $12.7 million when compared to the first quarter last year. Revenues…

Thank you, Eva. I'll begin with Golden State Water's general rate case. On January 30th, the CPUC issued a final decision in connection with the recent general rate case covering 2025 through 2027. Final decision adopts the settlement agreement between Golden State Water and the Public Advocates Office at the CPUC or Cal Advocates. Among other items, the decision authorizes Golden State Water to invest $573.1 million in capital infrastructure over the three year capital cycle. This includes $17.7 million of advice letter capital investments to be filed for revenue recovery during the second and third year attrition increases when those projects are completed. In addition, the approved settlement agreement includes $58.2 million of advice letter capital investments that began construction in 2023, which we expect to file for revenue recovery during the second and third year attrition increases when those projects are completed. For all of the advice letter projects, Golden State Water is allowed to accrue interest during construction at the adopted cost of debt and recover the full rate of return, including all applicable components of the revenue requirement after the assets are placed in service up until the assets are included in customer rates. Excluding revenues for advice letter capital projects, adopted operating revenues less water supply cost for 2025 are projected to increase by approximately $23 million when compared to 2024. As we mentioned previously, the final decision ordered Golden State Water to transition from a full decoupling mechanism and a full supply cost balancing account, which we, again, requested in the general rate case application to a modified rate adjustment mechanism, a Monterey-style Water Revenue Adjustment Mechanism or M-WRAM and an incremental cost balancing account for supply costs effective January 1, 2025. Without the continuation of a full revenue decoupling mechanism and a full…

[Operator Instructions] And our first question comes from Jonathan Reeder from Wells Fargo.

Congrats on a good Q1, pretty straightforward update following the year and just two months ago. I had two quick questions for you. Eva, I know you said you raised a little more than $25 million of equity via the ATM in Q1. Are you still expecting to raise about $60 million over the full year 2025?

I think in terms of full year, $60 million probably is our target. But right now, we have some capacity in our credit facility. And so we'll reassess how much we need to fund the market for this year. But over the three year rate case cycle, we plan to do the $200 million. We did, I want to say, $119 million -- $117 million so far. So we still have a total of $83 million to $85 million left. So we're playing out for the next two years.

So think of it as that $85 million now spread out over two years kind of...

Hopefully

What about on ASUS? Bob, is there any update on new military base privatization efforts? Are there any basis that have come up for RFP that are progressing and we could get some sort of decision in the next couple of years or has, I guess, the Trump administration's efforts around DOGE or anything impacted the way you see that business evolving either more privatization is occurring or consolidation of bases or kind of anything like that?

So on the military front, as we've talked in the past, we sort of bifurcate the military program by a branch. And so we've got the Army, the Air Force and the Navy. Do we see any actual privatizations in 2025? There are no 50 year privatizations out on the street at this point. So the expectation there is we probably won't see a privatization this year -- in fact, an award is what I would say. We do expect the Army to be putting perhaps one or two privatizations up later this year, although, things are a little bit in the state of flux there, not from, hey, we've heard this or we've heard that. It's just more us trying to read the tea leaves that everyone else is reading. Not sure that means we're going to see a slowdown or an increase. But we recognize that we have a new administration in office and it could have an impact on military based privatizations, we're not sure which direction either at this point. But it looks like the Army is sort of completed. They're in the process of completing their assessment. Approximately a year ago, our team was at a presentation where they were talking very favorably about doing -- sort of cranking back up the privatization program. As you may know, the Army has sort of taken a pause since the end of 2020 on that program. We think the Air Force is perhaps a little bit behind the Army and reinstituting their program but the Navy has been, I would say, the most excited about the program. And as you know, they've done a couple of privatizations, one of which is the Patuxent River that we had won. And then we have the JBCC contract, which is a 15 year contract. And it's possible we'll see something similar to that, that could get worked on during 2025, but not entirely clear about that. So there's a number of irons in the fire, some nontraditional. Those nontraditional are a little more difficult to bring to closure. Similar to like JBCC, we had spent quite a bit of time on that. But we're glad to have that contract and it's sort of a new contracting vehicle that available to the Department of Defense at this point. We're proud that we know how to make that work and perhaps that gives us a leg up on the competition at least on those kinds of privatizations. That was a long winded answer, happy to expand. I hope -- hopefully, I answered your question.

No, that was a great answer, a lot more detail and good detail than I was anticipating. So I'm kind of chuckling a little bit, but I thank you for it, Bob. And just following up…

I don't expand. Well, must be a rough morning for me…

No, I mean I love when management teams give real answers to questions. It's refreshing…

Yes, that's kind of where we're at, Jonathan. I mean, it's -- as you know, there is uncertainty at the DoD right now and -- as there is a lot of different government agencies. But so far, everything is going fine on the basis we have and we continue to make a lot of sales calls. So that's always important.

On those nontraditional like kind of the 15 year contracts, do those like tend to be or do they necessarily have to be like kind of the smaller bases out there, whereas the larger ones would always go to the 50 year variety or not necessarily?

I think the 15 year variety is -- I think, it's just a little easier for the bases to get their arms around. 50 years is a long time. We're obviously -- we like the 50 year contracts. It's -- those are very, very well run privatizations by the Defense Logistics Agency, Energy, very sort of efficient bidding processes, exchange for services. The one we did at JBCC it took a long time and we kind of invented -- us and JBC sort of invented a road map for that. And now it's, I guess, another tool in the tool belt for the government that may be -- make it easier for them to sign up to a 15 year contract than a 50 year contract. So we'll see if there's those kinds of things out there. We are pursuing at least one of those. And then we're also seeing other, I want to say, nontraditional type privatizations that will take probably several years to run to ground if, in fact, they come to fruition. So I guess my point is it's not just the 50 year utility privatization template, but we do hope that the Army and the Air Force are back pursuing that.

Well, good luck as you pursue those contracts and continue executing on the regulatory front. You can at least take a little bit of pause being between all the rate cases and the cost of capital extension. So that's good from a regulatory risk perspective. But thanks for the update and the time.

Thank you, Jonathan. A little little less activity on the regulatory front this year so far. So that's nice. Last year, it was a lot of work and a lot of -- well, I mean we think we've got two good decisions and you just got to work hard on those things and try to get settlements. And we think we got a couple of good ones. So thank you for your questions.

[Operator Instructions]

Okay. Jamie, if we aren't getting any other questions, we can wrap it up. Is that okay?

Absolutely. With no further questions, I'll turn the floor back over to Mr. Sprowls for closing remarks.

Thank you, Jamie. I just want to thank everyone today for their participation, and we look forward to speaking with you next quarter. So have a good rest of your week, everybody.

And with that, ladies and gentlemen, we'll conclude today's conference call and presentation. We do thank you for joining. You may now disconnect your lines.