Thank you, Eva. As you can tell from our press release earlier today and Eva's comments, we experienced another strong quarter of growth in earnings in each of our business segments. In addition, we've had a very strong cash flow for the year thus far. I would like to take some time now and provide you with an update on regulatory activities at our water and electric utility business segments. In June of this year, we filed a motion to adopt a settlement agreement between Golden State Water Company, the CPUC's Division of Ratepayer Advocates, also known as DRA, and The Utility Reform Network, also known as TURN, in connection with Golden State's general rate case for water. You will recall that we filed this rate case in July 2011. The proposed settlement, if approved by the CPUC, resolves almost all the issues in the rate case application and would generate approximately $9 million in additional annual revenues starting in 2013 as compared to 2012 adopted revenues. The proposed rate increases for 2014 over 2013 are $8.0 million and the 2015 proposed rate increases over 2014 amount to $6.5 million. While the increase in 2013 revenues would be $9 million under the settlement agreement, the increase in the adoptive water gross margin is approximately $18 million or 8.4% when compared to the 2012 adopted water gross margin due to a decrease in adopted supply cost of $9 million in 2013 as compared to the 2012 amount. The administrative law judge in charge of the case requested that Golden State Water, DRA and TURN file additional testimony to address the reasonableness of the WRAM mechanism. Last month, the 3 parties filed additional testimony. The settlement agreement for this general rate case is subject to an acceptable resolution regarding the WRAM. New rates, once approved by the CPUC, will be effective January 1, 2013. In other significant regulatory matter was the cost of capital decision issued in June. Actually, this decision was issued in July. The decision approves the settlement agreement entered into between Golden State Water, 3 other California water utilities and DRA in November 2011. The approved settlement authorizes a return on equity of 9.99% and a rate-making capital structure for Golden State Water of 55% equity and 45% debt. The resulting weighted cost of capital or rate of return on rate base is 8.64%. The new rate of return authorized by the CPUC's final decision will be implemented into water rates retroactive to January 1, 2012. The decision also authorizes the continuation of the Water Cost of Capital Mechanism, which adjusts the adopted return on equity if there's 100-basis-point change in the average of the Moody's Aa utility bond index. If the Water Cost of Capital Mechanism is triggered, the adopted return on equity is adjusted by 1/2 the change in the bond index. The benchmark period in place was from October 1, 2010 to September 30, 2011, with an average interest rate of 5.05%. Considering where interest rates are currently, we anticipate that the adopted return on equity may be reduced by 50 to 60 basis points, effective January 1, 2013. Since the measurement period runs from October to September each year, we'll be able to report any adjustment to the 2013 return on equity when we discuss our 2012 third quarter results. For your information, a reduction of 50 basis points in the adopted return on equity would reduce Golden State's 2013 earnings per share by approximately $0.10 and decrease revenues by about $3.3 million. In July 2012, Golden State Water filed with the CPUC an application requesting authorization for it to issue by public offering or private placement securities not exceeding $225 million in aggregate offering amount. Golden State Water expects the CPUC to approve this application in late 2012 or early 2013. Upon approval, Golden State Water will attempt to capitalize on the current low cost of capital by issuing new debt and redeeming old debt at higher coupon rate, thus generating future savings for our customers. With that, I would like to recap the general rate case application for Golden State Water Company's Bear Valley Electric division that was discussed last quarter. In February 2012, we filed our general rate case application for Bear Valley Electric for rates in years 2013 through 2016. If rates are approved as filed, the rate increases are expected to generate approximately $1.3 million in annual revenues starting in 2013. The proposed rate increases for 2014 over 2013 are $1.9 million, the 2015 proposed rate increases over to 2014 amount to $1.3 million and the 2016 proposed rate increases over the 2015 amount are $1.3 million. This general rate case application is in the process of review with the CPUC. Once approved, we expect new electric rates to become effective in the first quarter of 2013. Let's turn our discussion to the company's contracted services segment, American States Utility Services or ASUS. ASUS is focused on maintaining a customer service culture and we continue to build our relationship with the U.S. government. Earnings from ASUS have grown significantly over the past 3.5 years and we have not historically paid a dividend on those earnings. On July 31, 2012, ASUS' Board of Directors approved, for the first time, a dividend of $6.7 million to American States Water Company to completely fund our upcoming dividend payable to shareholders on September 1, 2012. With the solid outlook for ASUS, we anticipate ASUS to continue providing partial funding of dividends that American States Water Company pays out to its shareholders. For the second quarter of 2012, ASUS continued to report strong earnings as we increased our construction activities at the various military bases ASUS serves, especially at Fort Bragg, as we progress with the water and wastewater pipeline replacement project, along with other capital upgrades. We have made more progress than we anticipated on the pipeline replacement project and expect the project will be completed in early 2014. There are many variables that affect the timing of construction work. Some of these variables, such as weather, worked in our favor during the first 6 months of the year, but may not necessarily be a benchmark to project earnings for the remainder of 2012. We have also been awarded new contract modifications by the U.S. government or the various military bases ASUS operates. While it is difficult at this time to quantify the earnings impacts of these new projects, we expect the majority of these new construction work to be completed by the end of 2013. As I discussed with you previously, we believe successful price redetermination and requests for equitable adjustment or REA filings will provide added revenues perspectively to help offset increasing cost and provide ASUS the opportunity to consistently generate positive operating income at its subsidiaries that serve military bases. We currently have no significant requests for equitable adjustment outstanding with the U.S. government. However, various price redeterminations for managing the assets at the military bases are currently in negotiation with the government. To summarize, the U.S. government is currently reviewing the first price redeterminations for Fort Bragg in North Carolina and Fort Jackson in South Carolina, which were filed in December 2011 and February 2012, respectively. Interim price increases are in place for both military bases. We have reached an agreement with the U.S. government on our first price redetermination for Andrews Air Force Base in Maryland. Final contract modification is pending government funding approval, which we expect to receive later in 2012. We have completed our first price redetermination for Fort Lee, Fort Eustis and Fort Story in Virginia. The second price redetermination for Fort Lee was filed with the U.S. government in May of this year. The second price redetermination for the other military bases in Virginia was filed with the U.S. government last month. The price redetermination for Fort Bliss for the 3-year period beginning October 1, 2012, was filed on July 16 of this year. ASUS is working closely with the U.S. government to provide timely submittal and resolution to these price redeterminations. Before I turn the conference over to the operator to entertain questions, I would like to thank you again for your continued support and interest in the company.