Welcome to the Q4 2015 Avista Corporation Earnings Conference Call. My name is Cynthia, and I will be your operator for today’s call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. Please note that this conference is being recorded. I will now turn the call over to Jason Lang, Investor Relations Manager. Mr. Lang, you may begin.

Thank you, Cynthia, and good morning, everyone. Welcome to Avista’s fourth quarter and fiscal year 2015 earnings conference call. Our earnings and our 2015 Form 10-K were released pre-market this morning, now both available on our website at avistacorp.com. I have just have been informed that there are some issues going on with the webcast right now. So if you are having issues, they are trying to fix that. And also we will have a replay of this call, and so you’ll be able to see the slide then. Joining me this morning are Avista Corp. Chairman of the Board, President and CEO, Scott Morris; Senior Vice President and CFO, Mark Thies; Senior Vice President and the President of Avista Utilities, Dennis Vermillion; and the Vice President, Controller and Principal Accounting Officer, Ryan Krasselt. I would like to remind everyone that some of the statements that will be made today are forward-looking statements that involve assumptions, risks and uncertainties, which are subject to change. For reference to the various factors, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in today’s call, please refer to our Form 10-K for 2015 which is available on our website. To begin this presentation, I would like to recap the financial results presented in today’s press release. Our consolidated earnings for the fourth quarter of 2015 was $0.61 per diluted share compared to $0.51 for the fourth quarter of 2014. Results for the fourth quarter of 2015 included $0.07 per diluted share and the fourth quarter of 2014 included $0.03 per diluted share related to discontinued operations, which resulted from the sale of Ecova in 2014. For the full-year, consolidated earnings were $1.97 per diluted share for 2015, compared to $3.10 last year. Results for 2015 included $0.08 per diluted share and 2014 included $1.17 per diluted share related to discontinued operations, which resulted from the sale of Ecova in 2014. Now, I’ll turn the discussion over to Scott.

Well, thank you, Jason, and good morning, everyone. We had a strong year and I’m pleased with our financial and operating performance in 2015. We made significant progress in achieving our goals of investing in our infrastructure, upgrading our technology, and preparing our utility to effectively and efficiently serve our customers. In 2015, weather played a significant role in our operations. On November 17, an historic windstorm occurred in our service territory, which caused severe damage to our electrical system. Included in our 2015 results are cause for power restoration of $22.9 million for capital repairs and $2.9 million for incremental utility operating and maintenance costs. I would like to take this opportunity to say thank you, again, to everyone involved in the storm restoration effort. This was a monumental task that took thousands of hours to complete, and I’m extremely proud of the way the company, the community, and our contract and mutual aid crews rallied together to make this historic recovery possible. Thankfully, we were able to restore power without one single safety incident. Turning back to the financial results, our Juneau operations at AEL&P had a strong year, and as a results met our expectations. We’re very pleased with how the company is performing. Now, I’d like to give you an update on the additional business opportunities we’re working on in Alaska. As we discussed in our last call, we have made progress in our evaluation of bringing natural gas to Juneau. Currently, we believe that lower, excuse me, lower oil prices may make it more difficult for our customers to justify converting to natural gas. In addition, we have yet to secure a mechanism to provide funds that are needed to help customers with the conversion costs, thus challenging the economics of the project. We will…

Thank you, Scott. Good morning, everyone. And consistent with past practice, I do try to wear a jersey during these calls. So today I have my Peyton Manning jersey on honor of his and the Broncos, more the Broncos defense win in the Super Bowl. So for 2015, Avista utilities contributed $1.81 per diluted share, which is down slightly from $1.83 last year. The 2015 earnings per share decreased primarily due to weather that was warmer than normal in the first and fourth quarters. And that was all partially offset by decoupling mechanisms in Washington. We do expect to have decoupling mechanisms, as Scott mentioned for 2016 in Washington and Idaho, and we requested that mechanism in Oregon. We also had higher operating expenses, depreciation and amortization, and taxes other than income all of which were expected. During the fourth quarter of 2015, Avista Utilities contributed $0.51 per diluted share, compared to $0.45 in 2014. Those earnings increased primarily due to a general rate increase in Washington, and this was partially offset by decreased heating loads, as I mentioned due to warmer weather and an increase for provision for earning sharing and all of the weather was offset by decoupling mechanisms. We continue to be committed, as Scott mentioned to updating and maintaining our utility systems. We expect Avista Utilities capital expenditures to be about $375 million in 2016, and we expect about $17 million at AEL&P in 2016. A significant portion of AEL&P’s capital are for construction of an additional backup generation plant that is expected to be completed in 2016. I’ll turn to liquidity and financing plans now. As of December 31, there were – we had $105 million of cash borrowings and $45 million of letters of credit outstanding leaving $250 million of available liquidity under our…

Thank you, Mark. Cynthia, we’d now like to open up the call up for questions.

Thank you. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] And our first question comes from Michael Weinstein with UBS. You may begin.

Hi, guys. How are you doing?

Good morning, Mike.

Good morning, Mike.

Good morning, good morning. I was wondering if – so I guess for the – with the low-end of the dead-band around the ERM, you’re expecting up to $4 million of earnings, but you’re not expecting to go into the sharing areas at this point?

[Multiple Speakers]

Yes.

Go ahead, Mike. I’m sorry.

I was wondering, if you could tell what the hydro levels are at this moment?

Well, currently the hydro levels, look, okay for us, as of February 22. So Monday, the Northwest River Forecast Center shows the water supply or the runoff from April through September, for the Clark Fork River at 86%, and the Spokane River is at 80%. And remember that on an average annual basis, we get about roughly 75% of our generation from the Clark Fork River. .:

All right. Have the temperatures been unusually cold or warm? I know I think two years ago, it was very cold, so there wasn’t a lot of melt and the ERM was in a low – a very high – let’s see in 2014, it was a very low position for first quarter. And in 2015, it was in a very high position because of its heavy melt. I was wondering if which one of those kinds of conditions seem to be shaping up this year?

Well, we have had warmer temperatures as of late. If you have been following our snowpack, it has come down somewhat over the last couple of weeks. And largely that’s the lower elevation snow, so that’s not unusual. As we start to see spring weather come in, the lower elevation obviously goes first. One of the other key things to remember is the price of natural gas being so low in our – in the Pacific Northwest that, that’s a significant benefit to our overall generation fleet as well. So the impacts of lower than normal generation aren’t felt as much basically.

And Mike just to be clear, I’m not sure. I thought you said, we’re at the low-end of the range. We expect to be in a benefit position under the ERM for 2016, just to clarify that in case you’re thinking of what the other way. We expect to be in a benefit for the year within the $4 million dead-band.

Yes, that’s what I meant, low-end of the benefit side. The new rate case that you just filed in Washington state, that’s going to be – is this the first time you’ve filed a multi-year rate case?

No, a couple of years ago, we filed in 2012 – in 2012, we filed for 2013 and 2014, in both Idaho and Washington. And in both of those cases, we did get a two-year rate plan. The last one, the one we filed before was just a one year, and so then this one is an 18-month plan. So it’s not outside of the realm of normal or possibility. We just have to work with the commission on that and the staff and all the parties.

Do they help you with regulatory lag? Any structural regulatory lag eliminated from that?

I don’t think, it has any impact necessarily on regulatory lag. It helps us to get a longer-term plan, so we’re not having back-to-back rate cases.

Right. And just one last question before I give it to somebody else. Could you talk a little more about Juneau, and I guess more about the timing of when you think you might get or of the ability to make decisions there and what’s going on with the LNG import?

Well, I’ll let Dennis weigh in here, because Dennis has done a tremendous job working with the Alaska communities to make this happen. But I just think a lot of it has to do quite frankly with market conditions. You see where oil prices are. We want to be prudent and smart about going to Juneau with oil under $30 a barrel. And with our LNG prices right now it’s about a break-even on a conversion costs and we have some work to do to make sure that our customers up there could have an opportunity to convert to natural gas, if we do choose to go in a way that is cost effective for them. So, Dennis, has a couple of plans. He is working on there. So I would just say that we’re still optimistic. It’s just some timing issues. And we’re going to be prudent and smart about it. And, yes, Dennis, I’ll let you kind of take it from there.

Well, that’s a good summary, Scott. The only thing I would really add also is, we continue to work with the local elected folks and state officials. And I’m sure you’re aware that just the overall budget situation for the state of Alaska with the price of oil, we have some pretty serious budget issues that they’re dealing with. So a lot of the focus and attention is elsewhere right now, as they try to wrestle with some of those issues that they’re dealing with. $30 oil is not a good thing. It’s a good thing if you’re a consumer yet, but for the state it has created quite a bit of problem. So we’re continuing to work through that as well and want to make sure that our plans are solid and lasting before we decide to move forward.

All right, great. Thank you very much, guys.

Thanks, Mike.

[Operator Instructions]

So do we have any other question, Cynthia.

We have no further questions at this time. I will now turn the call back over to Jason Lang for closing remarks.

I’d like to thank everyone for joining us today. We certainly appreciate your interest in our company. Have a great day.