Good afternoon. And welcome to AtriCure Q4 and Full-Year 2019 Earnings Conference Call. My name is Dwayne and I'll be your coordinator for the call today. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. We will be facilitating a question-and-answer session towards the end of today's call. As a reminder, this call is being recorded for replay purposes. I would now like to turn the call over to Lynn Lewis from the Gilmartin Group for a few introductory comments.

Thank you. By now you should have received a copy of the earnings press release. If you have not received the copy, please call 513-755-4136 to have one emailed to you. Before we begin today, let me remind you that the Company's remarks include forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond AtriCure's control, including risks and uncertainties described from time-to-time in AtriCure's SEC filings. AtriCure's results may differ materially from those projected. AtriCure undertakes no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements. Additionally, we refer to non-GAAP financial measures, specifically revenue reported on a constant currency basis, adjusted EBITDA and adjusted loss per share. A reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures with the most directly comparable GAAP measures is included in our press release, which is available on our Web site. With that, I'd like to turn the call over to Mike Carrel, President and Chief Executive Officer. Mike?

Thanks, Lynn. Good afternoon, and thank you, for joining us today. As I reflect on 2019 and as we usher in a new decade, I am struck by the transformational development of AtriCure over the past 10 years. While concentrating our efforts on the three pillars of our mission, Innovation, Clinical Science and Education, we have made tremendous progress on multiple fronts and have meaningfully expanded our market opportunities. Some of these highlights include; we achieved 29 quarters of double-digit revenue growth year-over-year; we diversified and bolstered our product portfolio, launching over 12 new products and innovations beginning with the launch of the launch of the AtriClip franchise 10 years ago and strengthened more recently by the launch of cryoSPHERE for cryo and nerve block therapy in 2019. We completed significant acquisitions, including in contact in 2015 and most recently in August 2019, SentreHEART, with the LARIAT suture device. We have invested heavily in clinical trial to develop significant differentiation for the treatment of Afib over the long term. We have trained over 3,000 physicians, nurses and other practitioners globally through our training programs, which were recently endorsed by the Society for Thoracic Surgeons in early 2019. And finally, we have built the infrastructure and team to support accelerated growth and ongoing expansion. We now have 725 people across the organization, including over 200 in the field globally supporting our sales. We have built a winning foundation and achieved critical milestones of setting the stage for success across our franchises in 2020 and over the next decade. To that end and as previously announced, we expect another year of double digit revenue growth in 2020 with revenue in the range of $254 million to $261 million. Turning now to our landmark IDE trials we have underway, which address market expanding…

Thanks Mike. For the fourth quarter of 2019, worldwide revenue was $61.3 million, representing growth of 15.9% on a GAAP basis and 16.4% on a constant currency basis over the fourth quarter of 2018. Revenue from U. S. product sales increased 14.9% to $49.5 million. U. S. open ablation revenue grew 12%, driven by the addition of the cryoSPHERE probe launched in early 2019. U. S. sales of minimally invasive ablation products were down 5% to $9 million, showing continued volatility from this business. U. S. sales of appendage management products were $19.1 million, an increase of 31.6%. The AtriClip Flex V, along with our minimally invasive LAA exclusion system devices, continued to lead growth in the appendage management franchise. The fourth quarter of 2019 also includes a small impact from the LARIAT system. International revenue totaled $11.8 million, up 20.5% on a GAAP basis and 22.8% on a constant currency basis as compared to the fourth quarter of 2018. As a reminder, the transition of the China distributor was in process during 2018 and we did not receive orders for that market in the first and fourth quarters of 2018. In addition to the contribution from China in the fourth quarter of 2019, we saw strong growth in our Asia markets, notably Japan, as well as our European markets, driven by the UK, Germany and the Benelux region. International growth was also led by appendage management product sales. Gross margin was 73% for both the fourth quarter of 2019 and 2018. While we saw an increase in gross margin in the fourth quarter of 2019 as a result of operational improvements and lower production costs in our core manufacturing operations, this was offset by the absorption of SentreHEART manufacturing operations, as well as mix between U. S. and international…

Thanks, Andy. Before we open up for questions, I want to take a moment to thank our team at AtriCure. We've helped over 90,000 patients worldwide during 2019 and over 500,000 this past decade. Together, we have built a strong platform of products supported by clinical evidence and training, which provide multiple treatment alternatives for Afib patients globally. Our work truly matters and I appreciate each and every one of your contributions toward impacting patient lives every day. In closing, we remain confident that we are poised to significantly change the landscape of Afib treatment and we are committed to accomplishing our strategic initiatives to that end. We look forward to delivering a future on the foundational growth and the catalyst, including CONVERGE, aMAZE, cryo nerve blocks and EnCompass and future AtriClip clinical data. We'll now turn the call over to questions. Operator?

Thank you, sir. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Jason Mills from Canaccord. Please go ahead.

Congratulations on another great year. So I wanted to ask you a few questions that I get asked a lot from investors, so an opportunity for you to address them head on. Probably the most often asked question is the future of the MIS business and revenue growth of MIS post-CONVERGE. So perhaps you could address a few issues within that question. One would be the development of the market from a sales force perspective, so your plans on that front, where you are now, where you might expect to be upon FDA approval, hopefully at the end of this year and how that might expand in 2021. And I guess, I'm guessing you're not going to give any sort of growth guidance quantitatively for 2021. But oftentimes I get asked, should MIS that opportunity, does that portend accelerating growth potential on the overall business. Is it big enough? Is that market exciting enough to excite that kind of trend acceleration? Maybe you could address that head on to, and then I had a follow up on the clip business?

Thanks for the question. And obviously, the question would get a lot relative to our MIS business with CONVERGE and the data coming out here soon and obviously looking forward to the approval sometime in 2020. I'll address your first question, or kind of what you started with, which is the kind and the growth and the guidance and the acceleration in the growth rate. I mean, the way we look at this is we absolutely look at this as a multibillion dollar market. 70% of the patients that are out there have persistent or longstanding persistent Afib. Within that category 40% have longstanding persistent Afib. It is a massive market with millions of patients globally and in the United States alone. And so it is a big market opportunity. And today, we're only doing a couple of thousand cases on the CONVERGE side. So we see this as it's going to be a very large market opportunity. I don't see a reason that by the end of the decade, we shouldn't be doing 25,000 plus procedures at some point in time. Remember, it's complementary to the catheters, there's 150,000 catheters that do catheter ablation today for Afib patients. That number is projected over the next five years to be well over 200,000, we’ll be just scratching the surface on this patient population. It's a very large population from that standpoint. So to answer your question, yes, I think it's a big enough market to generate and accelerate our growth rate. I'm not going to pick the quarter that that's going to begin. But obviously, we're getting ourselves ready for it, so that 2021 can begin some of that acceleration. And then as you look at 2022 and 2023, we should begin to see acceleration in the overall growth rate…

On the appendage management business, I wondered if you could give, take a step and give us your sense for the next couple of years in LAA management. We've seen an evolution certainly over the last couple of years and you've both driven and benefited from that. With the acquisition of SentreHEART, clearly, you're looking to capitalize what seems to be continued evolution in the direction of more cases, more LAAs being treated proactively. Could you talk about where you are now from a penetration standpoint in the markets in which and in the nieces of that market that you participate, what SentreHEART adds to it? And does that also sort of get beyond next year, and you start to see growth potentially accelerating because of that business too, right? Could you talk a little bit about that?

I think you've kind of set it up really well there, Jason, which is one of the things that we have as a business is that with these acquisitions and also just the investments that we've made over the last several years to get ourselves ready for catalysts over the next five years and the appendage management is a great space for that. So you're absolutely correct. I mean if you think about, I'll start with the LARIAT piece of it, which the market is just as big. It’s additive technology to converge and to the catheter ablation because basically the CONVERGE take up the backlog, the catheter does a great job with the PBIs and then you've got the appendage management to kind of close that out. And as I mentioned in my script, a lot of the triggers as we well know, come from around the base of the appendage and through the appendage quite frankly. And so that's kind of the theory behind the trial and that should be another accelerator to growth in 2023 and 2024. So you begin to kind of layer on some of these, as you kind of get into the outer part of those years and we bought SentreHEART obviously last year with the anticipation of that helping us to accelerate our growth into the back half of the decade and be another really big multibillion dollar market for us from that standpoint. As it relates to clip, which you're very well aware, that’s gone concomitantly with other cardiac surgery primarily today that is pretty much how that product is being used. And the penetration -- we sold just over 50,000 or so in 2019 totally around the globe. So that's a lot. That's kind of industry leading. We're at over 220,000…

Our next question comes from Matthew O'Brien from Piper Sandler. Please go ahead.

Just quick clarification for Andy, the 10% to 13% top line guidance. Does that include any kind of impact from China, or just given that those markets that you have right now and what's going on there as far as the corona virus goes?

No, the 10 to 13, it's our range for the business. Don't expect just given the size of the Asia business overall a huge impact, but obviously we're still evaluating as time is going on and we're working with our teams down the field to get a better understanding of what that -- how that could potentially impact the business overtime, but we're comfortable with the 10% to 13% as it stands.

And then, Mike, you started talking about this when you're answering Jason's question about the clip business. But as I look at the guidance for 2020, it's probably going to be pretty clip heavy again and open, you're excited about CONVERGE, but that's more 2021, 2022 event. And then open should benefit a little bit from cryo. But it still seems like it's going to be largely a clip heavy year this year. So what gives you the confidence that that 10 to 13 with tough comps in the clip business, doesn't sound like prophylactic is going to be a massive tailwind this year. Is the label expansion in clips going to help? Is it more sales reps just the comfort level you have for that business specifically this year and 2020?

As you recall over the last several years, we came out with many innovations in the space. The V clip, as I mentioned, has really been a boost and as more and more people get used to using that product they’re finding new ways to use it and it's helping us grow the market. I mean we're still really, really under-penetrated in that space. Even in the treatment for Afib and there's 90,000 patients, as I mentioned before, just over 30,000 are actually getting a clip on. So pretty much every one of those patients should be getting a clip on or having their appendage managed, while they're in cardiac surgery. So we see that they're still just in under-penetration game going on within the next several years within the clip space concomitantly. And that's really what's driving most of the bullishness and the comfort on the clip. Like you said, it's going to be a big driver for our growth this year overall and we think the V clip has really kind of helped up quite a bit on that front.

Can I sneak in one more real quick one just on the clinical data side, there was the FROST abstract just posted. You hit the primary endpoint. I think you missed the secondary endpoint on the pain score. And just love to hear a little bit more about how significant that is and any kind of response you're getting from the field on that data just in totality? Thank you.

I mean, the response has been very, very good. I mean the primary endpoint as you mentioned was really lung functions and kind of restoration of breathing, and the primary endpoint was met in a big way on that particular front. So we feel very good about the results that came out with that. That was really the primary one we're looking at. The other end point, as you said, was more of a subjective measure around pain. They were pretty equal. Now what's interesting about that is they were actually equally low on the pain management, because they were using standard of care in some of the pain management threshold of that. We kind of expected that within that area, but it was definitely something where we kind of saw they were almost equivalent on the pain scores specifically. But how they recovered, how quickly they recovered, was significant. And at STS this year, [Dr. Liu] basically presented that and there was a very positive response from the audience when he was presenting, and conversations afterwards as well.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Robbie Marcus from JP Morgan. Please go ahead.

I wanted to touch on CONVERGE and we're going to be getting hopefully at HRS, we'll get a late breaker. But I just wanted to understand the confidence and the timing to move it into presentation and away from potential FDA panel pack. Was there something, the data you saw that gave you confidence to present it as a late breaker? And do you still, at this point, expect the potential FDA panel?

The reason that we made the decision to go for the HRS late breaker was because we didn't want to be the first one in the Afib market specifically to go down that path. And when some other companies that were doing some trials in the Afib space decided you -- a different patient population for sure, but they came out of the Afib symposium that really kind of led the way for us to be able to kind of come out at a scientific session, and the closest one to when we got the data in that we could actually submit for a late breaker was HRS. So it really had nothing to do with the underlying data and had everything to do with just the timing if somebody else kind of submitting for a different one that we felt comfortable not being the first one at that point in time, and that it made a lot of sense to have key leading physicians presented as close as we possibly could from when the data came out. So that's the primary reason why we made that change to kind of get it out there. We just didn't want to be the first ones out there. And so we're kind of now following the model much like other medical device companies have where the data comes out at the trials. And hopefully, this will be something that continues to happen within the Afib space now that several companies have done it. I think there was a second question. I think there’s a second question. I can't recall what it was though.

I'll just kind of wrap it into my follow up question it was, what's your latest thoughts on timing for maybe approval or potential FDA panel ahead of approval? And then second part, we can all dream really big numbers on what this opportunity could look like over time. So what's your latest thoughts on potential timing of approval? And then just walk us through maybe the headwinds or steps you have to walk through to drive adoption of this and help us set expectations for the ramp, should it be positive? Thank you.

I mean, it allows me really quickly the kind of walk through. So we submitted all the FDA data back in December of 2019. There's a 100 day clock that kicks in then. We plan on having an FDA 100 day meeting sometime in the April timeframe, mid to late April was likely when we'll get feedback from the FDA on whether or not we're going to have to go to panel at that time. Obviously, I don't know at this point whether or not. I think I've talked in this call before, it really comes down to conversations with them, not really necessarily about the data per se but about, we have the technology out in the marketplace for a long time, it’s been used for a long period of time. It’s just really that how does that affected and can we get them to basically kind of move away from doing a panel. But obviously, we're at the limb of the conversations, we're going to wind up having with the FDA in that April timeframe or so. So I'm sure there are lot of good questions for us to kind of work through. That will obviously drive a lot of the timing if we go to panel. Panel is likely sometime in the July-August timeframe and then fulfilling approval would be shortly thereafter three to six months, I mean it depends on kind of feedback or questions they've got on labeling. But hopefully, the sooner part of that. So right now we're just on the clock with the FDA and going to be having to do that. I should say, though, that while the 100 day clock starts, we have already started on many of the other operational items underlying it, not the labeling aspect of the data…

Thank you. Our next question comes from Danielle Antalfy from SVB Leerink. Please go ahead.

I wanted to ask the other side of the guidance question and that is, why only the, I think it was 10% to 13%. And then if you look at what you put up in 2019, you actually saw growth acceleration and specifically in the back half of the year and this was off of what we thought were tough comps in 2018. So just curious on what you are seeing that would make you expect some deceleration in 2020, number one. Number two specifically as it relates to the open ablation business, you saw really nice growth acceleration in that business in 2019 versus 2018. So Mike, could you just remind us on what's driving that growth and how sustainable that is?

I mean, when you look at our business, you look at our guidance. Obviously, we want to make sure that we're able to meet and exceed the guidance for the year. That's something that we've prided ourselves on overall as a business. The numbers obviously do get larger. As we look out to 2021 and 2022, we've got really big catalysts that are going to change the market in general and accelerate our growth rate in really big ways. This year really it's another good strong double-digit revenue growth year. If you actually look back to when we entered into 2019, our guidance was 9% to 13%. We obviously exceeded that and had a really, really good and strong year. It’s the beginning part of the year, we feel really good about the year. We feel good about the team we've got in place. But we want to set it appropriately so that we can make sure that we can meet and exceed that guidance for the year that's really what falls behind it overall. And then as you look out in the outer years, hopefully, we'll be able to accelerate based on the catalyst of these big clinical trial base that are coming out in the future. And then also as I mentioned, it's not just the clinical trials, we've got new products coming down the pipeline with EnCompass, and then you've also got a possibility in other trials as well.

And maybe I'll ask the question this way. Is there any different sort of stance on or approach that you're taking to guidance, because you did handle the guidance for 2019? So as you look at 2020, are you viewing things differently or approaching guidance differently to be more realistic, or are you leaving that same sort of level of conservationism baked in?

We're always looking -- I mean I wouldn't say that our philosophy has changed in anyway. We constantly look at the business from 10 different angles to make sure that we're not missing anything, to make sure that we've accounted for things on all side, both of upsides and downsides relative to it. So nothing fundamentally has changed in the way that we're viewing it or looking at the year given that we're only six weeks into the year, we kind of -- nothing is fundamentally different in the way we look at last year.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Mike Matson from Needham Company. Please go ahead.

I wanted to ask about this new EnCompass ablation probe. So I understand that this is something that would help maybe drive increased adoption in the CABG procedures. But is this something you may also be able to get a price and mix benefit on as well?

The answer is, yes. I mean, it will be a higher-priced product. It's a really innovative product that basically makes it a lot easier to go around the heart and really kind of ablate in multiple different areas with having to do a lot fewer dissections for those that have more difficulty doing some of those dissections. I mentioned CABG, because it tends to be in CABG or AVR patients when they're not open or they don't feel comfortable opening up the atrium for one reason or another. It really does allow to ablate more comprehensively in various different ways in the existing clamps that we have today that are really focused on the veins only, initially kind of gives a more complete procedure from that standpoint. So yes, it is more comprehensive. It's a really simple and easy-to-use product and our team has just done a really wonderful job on that front. And the price point will be higher than existing clamps, because it’s much more comprehensive in the ablations that it does.

And then, Andy, I think you've indicated that you expect the first quarter to be kind of at the lower end of the revenue guidance range. Is that right? And I guess we're more than halfway through the quarter now. So I guess what's driving that?

For the quarter, I mean quite frankly, it’s just as we enter the year, we just want to make sure that we're in a really good spot for the overall year and there's nothing to read into it per se. But as we look at the year, we kind of look at the year building as we kind of get ourselves ready for conversion, get ourselves ready for the launch at the end of the year. And so we wanted to make sure that we’re kind of guiding appropriately.

And then finally, just on the open heart, I mean it’s good to see the double digit growth there, but you are including the cryo probe in there I think. And we’ve seen even Edwards, has now seen some deterioration in their domestic SAVR sales from TAVR cannibalization. So what are you seeing there? Are you seeing any impact at all from TAVR on the open heart business?

No, not at all. I mean we’ve talked about this before we’ve talking about on this call before. The market is incredibly under penetrated in that front. SAVR is a very, very small percentage of our overall business. We don't see really any pressure. Patients that have Afib are typically continuing to go in for surgery. And so that's not impacted -- that doesn't have a real impact on our overall business. I mean it's not material or meaningful piece to it overall. And I know I've talked about at length on this call before and I'd say it's even less so today than it was a year ago, and less so than it was the year before that and so it becomes a smaller and smaller component of our business overall.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Rick Weiss from Stifel. Please go ahead.

It's Drew on for Rick tonight. Just wanted to start with LARIAT for a second, so it's been about six months since you had LARIAT under your belt. Just how has the conversation with EP has been evolving as you kind of continue to work towards CONVERGE approval? And are you seeing increased interest from LARIAT trial sites to pursue CONVERGE? Just talk about any attraction that you're seeing in these early days.

We haven’t mentioned date out, we really focused the LARIAT on LARIAT, and there has been really not much crossover other than training and awareness and making people. But we've really have the teams separate all the way through the end of last year. We needed to get that trial done. The trial was our number one, two, three, four, five priority and that was really what we're doing. We're getting the team ready. Behind the scenes, we're getting the team ready in the field and making sure we're in the cases, the cases were being done well. That really hasn't changed. That team is incredibly clinical, is really -- they're great ambassadors for us to grow all the business. So we haven't leveraged them in any way towards CONVERGE and in any kind of meaningful way. That will change likely as we progress towards the PMA at the end of this year, but we really haven't done much training to kind of get them up to speed on that front. We have moved the teams together, so that they're actually working more -- they can work more collaboratively. But it's more so, so that they're not bumping into each other in hospitals and things like that. Again, by the end of the year, I think that'll change. But we're really kind of doing this in a very methodical way and haven't seen any kind of uptake per se on the CONVERGE side from that.

And then just from the AF symposium and then the left atrial appendage meeting a couple weeks ago. I mean, CONVERGE could clearly drive adoptions if it's positive. But when you're talking about the market, it seems like you're talking just more on catheter ablation and salvage procedures. And we've been hearing clinician feedback saying that they could even think of this as a frontline therapy. So just how are you kind of -- I know you can't really market this. But how are you positioning it or thinking about CONVERGE as a frontline therapy versus a redo procedure for previously failed catheter ablation?

I mean, we think that it can be both. I mean, I think that there's a practicality of it. So the prior itself was actually done in a frontline therapy putting all -- that randomization was done on the [novel] hearts that had never been ablated before. So the date is actually going to be on patients that had not been related before, had not gone through a PBI. And so that's obviously how the -- it's going to be pushed out that way once we actually are able to get that label and the approval relative to that. So we do see that as a really big market opportunity. But we're also realistic to know that a lot of times these patients do go through a catheter first, especially as the EP is trying to treat out it, and that's going to be kind of concomitant to that particular procedure at that time. And so I'd say that the way we're looking at it is, it really applies to both. We'll wind up marketing it as the FDA gives us whatever leeway and latitude they give towards that, we’ll basically leverage that. But it can be both a front-line therapy and obviously one they can be after a catheter ablation has already been done and they failed. I see both having an impact on this patient population. We extend the gross for the number of catheters, the reason I used that 100 number catheter number is because the numbers are so large. When I start talking about there are 6 million patients in the United States that have Afib, 4 million of them have persistent longstanding persistent and we’re doing 2,000 procedures today. It's just its likely flat. It’s a pretty big market and that it’s completely on -- that's really on path. So I tried to bring it down to, okay, well what's the reality of who's getting a bladed today and it's through that, it's close to depending on what numbers, you look at 120,000 to 150,000 catheter ablations that are being done every year, 50-50 or 50% are paroxysmal early stage and 50% are the later stage, ones that we tend to focus on. And even just attaching to some of those and being complimentary to that, as I mentioned in my comments, that also is just a huge market and that market is growing as we all know north of 10%. So that's why we tend to focus on the number of catheter ablations, just to kind of make it easy for people to think through it.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Marie Thibault from BTIG. Please go ahead.

I want to start here, I want to get a few more details on the V clip launch in Europe you have this year. I know it's been a strong product in the U. S. And how should we think about that launch throughout this year? It sounds like it should be helping both on the pricing side, as well as supporting kind of sustained strong procedure growth over there? Any more details you can give us on that launch?

I think the European market has been clamoring for the V clip. It is a higher price market, so they're more price sensitive over in Europe. And so we don't anticipate that it's all of a sudden just going to take off. It'll take a little bit of time. So this year is going to be kind of about seeding the market and beginning to grow it. But I think the biggest excitement is just that clip is the fastest growing part of our market overall in Europe. And then you combine that with now we've got our most innovative and great technology that’s out there that they're going to get access to, it's going to create buzz and excitement about AtriCure’s bringing new products into this market, have spent the time and we care about that market and we do care deeply about it. And that you'll begin to kind of see it kind of as an additive piece to the growth overall there, but not necessarily some hockey stick is going to happen, because equipotent to that market, because they're a little more price sensitive and we're pretty disciplined on the price on it.

My second follow-up, it's more of a modeling question. I appreciate the uptick in R&D spend for 2020, given the multiple research priorities you have. But when we think about CONVERGE at HRS, a possible FDA panel, the aMAZE cap, the other trials, the pipeline. Can you help us how to think about the quarterly R&D spend cadence throughout the year?

As you think about it, there's going to be some ups and downs kind of I would say throughout the year, just given cadence of the different trials and as the caps come online. But quite frankly, the easiest way to think about it is just as a starting point, the percentages we give in the script just to kind of keep you in line, there's going to be some movements up and down obviously around those on a quarterly basis. But you're right. It’s a lot of moving parts. And so without giving you very specific quarter-by-quarter numbers, I would start with we’ve kind of provided in the prepared remarks.

Thank you. I see no further questions in the queue. At this time, I'd like to turn the call over to Mike Carrel, President and CEO, for closing remarks. Please go ahead.

Again, everyone thank you for joining the call today. As you can tell, we're excited about the next decade together and we look forward to talking to you again soon and seeing you at HRS for the late breaker. Talk to you soon. Have a great day.

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.