Hello and welcome to the A10 Networks’ First Quarter 2023 Financial Results Conference Call. My name is Alex, and I will be your moderator for today. [Operator Instructions ] I would now hand over to Tom Alan of FNK IR. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Thank you all for joining us today. This call is being recorded and webcast live and may be accessed for at least 90 days via the A10 Networks website at a10networks.com. Hosting the call today are Dhrupad Trivedi, ATN's President and CEO; and CFO, Brian Becker. Before we begin, I would like to remind you that shortly after the market closed today, A10 Networks issued a press release announcing its first quarter 2023 financial results. Additionally, A10 published a presentation and supplemental trended financial statements. You may access the press release, presentation and trended financial statements on the Investor Relations section of the company's website. During the course of today's call, management will make forward-looking statements, including statements regarding projections for future operating results, including our potential revenue growth, industry and customer trends, our capital allocation strategy, supply chain constraints and expectations, our positioning, our repurchase and dividend programs in our markets. These statements are based on current expectations and beliefs as of today, May 4, 2023.. These forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties, some of which are beyond our control, such as the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business and operations that could cause actual results to differ materially, and you should not rely on them as predictions of future events. A10 does not intend to update the information contained in these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, unless required by law. For a more detailed description of these risks and uncertainties, please refer to our most recent 10-Q. Please note that with the exception of revenue, financial measures discussed today are on a non-GAAP basis and have been adjusted to exclude certain charges. The non-GAAP financial measures are not intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for results prepared in accordance with GAAP and may be different from non-GAAP financial measures presented by other companies. A reconciliation between GAAP and non-GAAP measures can be found in the press release issued today and on the trended quarterly financial statements posted on the company's website. Now I would like to turn the call over to Dhrupad Trivedi, President and CEO of A10 Networks.

Thank you, Tom, and thank you all for joining us today. Our first quarter results were in line with the estimates we shared on April 3. While revenue was impacted by the economy and slowing purchasing decisions, the team moved quickly to respond to these changes, and we maintain our profitability at historical levels better positioning us to achieve our full year targets for non-GAAP EPS. This was due in large part to the focus on driving a more resilient and durable business model. As previously communicated, we believe the first quarter will represent a floor for our results this year, and we expect sequential improvements as we move through the balance of 2023. While large enterprises and especially Tier 1 service providers are more carefully considering investments due to the economy, security solutions remain a priority and are increasingly not a discretionary consideration. Companies around the world, even those with robust security processes and controls are experiencing an ever-growing threat of cyber attack. During the first quarter, we further augmented our already robust security infrastructure to enable us to better support our customers against these threats. Cyber attacks are simply a business reality for even the most prepared organization and that deploying solutions to mitigate this risk and the associated disruptions they cause is a priority even during challenging times. Like others, we are seeing longer sales cycles, particularly among larger North American customers due to concerns about the economy. We do not believe we have lost any meaningful forecasted deals to competitors, but they are taking longer to close, impacting our normal revenue cadence. I Indeed, North America declined 9% in the first quarter compared to last year, and revenue in the rest of the world was down 7% year-over-year. Effectively, all of this revenue decline was due…

Thank you, Dhrupad. First quarter revenue was $57.7 million, a decrease of 7.9% year-over-year, reflecting the headwinds Dhrupad described earlier. Product revenue for the quarter was $31.2 million, representing 54% of total revenue. Services revenue, which includes maintenance and support revenue was $26.5 million or 46% of total revenue. Moving to revenue from a geographic standpoint. Revenue from the Americas was $30 million, down 9.1%. As Grupa described, this reflects slowing purchasing from larger customers, primarily service providers due to the economic concerns. As you can see on our balance sheet, our deferred revenue was $128.5 million as of March 31, 2023, up 5.9% year-over-year. On a constant currency basis, deferred revenue would have increased 8.3% year-over-year. With the exception of revenue, all of the metrics discussed on this call are on a non-GAAP basis, unless otherwise stated. A full reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP results are provided in our press release and on our website. Gross margin for the first quarter was 83.1%. This reflects strong execution overcoming input cost pressures and due to our product mix. We expect our revenue mix to normalize in future quarters. We reported $13.4 million in non-GAAP operating income, up 14.3% compared with $11.7 million in the year ago quarter. Adjusted EBITDA was $15.5 million for the quarter, reflecting 26.8% of revenue. We were able to achieve our targeted adjusted EBITDA margins even as revenue declined by nearly 8%. Non-GAAP net income for the quarter was $9.9 million or $0.13 per share, which is relatively flat compared to $10 million or $0.13 per share in the year ago quarter. Maintaining our non-GAAP net income on 8% lower revenue is a significant accomplishment, demonstrating the earnings power we have built into the business. Diluted weighted shares used for computing non-GAAP EPS for the first quarter were approximately 75.5 million shares compared to 79.3 million shares in the year ago quarter. On a GAAP basis, net income for the quarter was $4 million or $0.05 per share compared with net income of $6.3 million or $0.08 per share in the year ago quarter. Turning to the balance sheet. As of March 31, 2023, we had $144.5 million in total cash and marketable securities compared to $150.9 million at the end of 2022. During the quarter, we paid $4.4 million in cash dividends, and we continue to carry no debt. As Juan mentioned, the Board approved a quarterly cash dividend of $0.06 per share to be paid on June 1, 2023, to shareholders of record on May 15, 2023. We -- as Dupin indicated, we believe the first quarter represents the floor for our financial results, and we anticipate sequential improvements throughout the year. I'll now turn the call back over to Dhrupad for closing comments.

Thank you, Ryan. There is no doubt this was a challenging start to the year, but our team responded effectively, delivering strong execution and solid profitability despite revenue headwinds. Our security-led solutions are in demand across all customer segments and in each of our target geographies and our solutions are aligned with durable secular catalyst. Operator, you can now open the call up for questions.

[Operator Instructions ] Our first question for today comes from Christian Schwab of Craig-Hallum. Christian?.

Great. So as we think about sequential revenue growth from here through the rest of the year, would you expect that to be kind of a linear event? Or how should we think about that?

Yes. I think I'll let Brian add context to that, right? So as we noted in the last call, our normal seasonality is being impacted certainly by the economy. And so I think our results for this year from first half to second half are likely to be more back-end loaded. So we certainly see that as reflecting some of the orders that are now scheduled or planned at least by the second half, right, if not earlier. And so I would say from that perspective, we certainly expect sequential improvements into Q3 and beyond and probably sequential improvements that are in line or slightly better than historic seasonality.

I don't know, Brian, anything...

Yes. I think we've talked about 2021 as a similar pattern where we had the pandemic was challenging revenue growth in the first half of the year. Last year, I think we saw 452% mix first half to second half in terms of how much revenue was recognized first half to second half. And we believe this year will be a similar pattern we saw in '21 with a little bit of a slow start. But as Rupa mentioned and as I said in the script, we haven't seen any meaningful cancellations or pullback. So we think it will be a sequential growth quarter.

Okay. Great. And then some of the things that you mentioned and highlighted partnerships Fastly and a large partnership in Japan. Is that directionally helpful? Or is that material revenue that could come this year?

Yes, good question, Christian. I would think of it in 2 different ways. One is, obviously, we continue to maintain and invest in differentiating solutions for large service providers around the world. But at the same time, as we see maybe more uncertainty or pause in their spending related to economy, we are also accelerating our efforts to be more relevant to large enterprise customers, right? So that's an example of where we are partnering. So we have a compelling value proposition. Typical sales cycle could be 6 months kind of time frame in an enterprise or large enterprise sales. So we are certainly in the mode of building the pipeline, and that certainly makes us optimistic to call that out as a meaningful partnership that gives us also more durability and broadening of revenue but in line with our differentiation. And the example related to Japan highlights that our progress in terms of supporting customers in hybrid environments, which could be on-prem, cloud, any other mode of consumption and that we are able to deliver kind of cloud leading applications as well, right? So that's a diversification but in the sort of vertical sense of where we are gaining more customers and partners. And we expect, again, that to be more relevant in pipeline generation in the next -- in the near term, but certainly not irrelevant on revenue either for the year.

Okay. Great. And then just one last question. The tight controls on operating expenses, should we anticipate that operating expenses will grow with revenue on a sequential basis? How should we be thinking about either operating expenses to revenue growth on a sequential basis going up? Or do you have a level of operating expenses you're targeting this year?

Yes. So I think there's 2 reasons, right? So one is, obviously, with our shortfall in revenue, there's a natural reduction in commission expenses and partner costs and things like that, right, on sales and marketing side. Second is, we are able to adjust discretionary spending more to be in line with revenue and pipeline potential versus just kind of doing it linearly or spreading it equally. And the third is, I think the decisions we are making as it relates to investments in product is more driven by ensuring that we are protecting our long-term growth and security portfolio and hybrid solutions completely and maybe being a little bit more prudent on how much we spend and how on commute the older product side. So we are doing it in a way that we think flexes and our business model philosophy really right is when revenue grows, a certain percentage, our OpEx growth is lower than that. And in the opposite direction, unfortunately, when revenue drops a certain percent, our OpEx went lower than that too, right? So I think we still are focused on delivering 80% gross margin, 26% to 28% EBITDA and flexing our cost structure with those kind of business model woes.

Great. Perfect.

Our next question comes from Gray Powell of BTIG.

Okay. Great. Just a couple on my side -- so I think you hit on this already, but can you maybe talk about the linearity you saw throughout Q1? And did you see any material improvement in activity over the course of April? Or any deals that slipped from March into April that have since closed.

Yes, good question. I think -- so in terms of linearity in Q1, what we saw was probably slower January than we expected, right, which we had been worried about in Q4 and probably by March and being more in line, right, with what we would have expected. So I would say, as we exited the quarter, certainly from a linearity order rate perspective, et cetera, things were better than beginning of the quarter, which not to suggest everything is completely normal. But certainly, we saw that trend where -- from what we would have expected, January start to linearity was a little worse, and March was probably in line. So that's kind of entering into the quarter. We certainly -- as we have gone through the quarter so far, we have been in line with what we are expecting and not seeing a worsening versus that expectation, right? So -- and we'll continue to monitor it, obviously, as the quarter goes on.

Okay. Really helpful. And then just high level, if we were to take sort of a blended average across your primary target markets, what do you think the growth is this year? And then how should we think it -- like how should it shake out once things normalize?

I -- so I think, Greg, just so I'm clear on the question, you are thinking of that relative to our infrastructure market and cybersecurity markets or geographically...

What is that...

Yes, exactly. Okay. Okay. So I think, certainly, what we are seeing now is our security-driven portfolio continues to be the lead for conversations right now. And that is where we are seeing probably some adjustment, top budget, but much more resilient than the rest of the portfolio, where that discretionary is not sort of the approach there. It's more of we need to do x and maybe we can push it a month or 2, right? But it's not being rescoped significantly or canceled. On the infrastructure side, projects that tie to customer revenue generation, I think are moving along, slightly slower and a little bit more scrutiny around them, but still moving along. And I would say the most affected category negatively related to new projects to replace infrastructure and nice to have projects. And so relative to those when I look at the growth rates near term and long term, I think on the security portfolio, we still expect that to be unchanged, slightly shifting from first half to second half maybe but on an annual basis, still supporting low single digits or better. And on our infrastructure side, I think the first half looks challenging more so. We have projects where we have line of sight to the second half of the year. But certainly, with inflation, concerns of recession, cost of capital, all of that, North America infrastructure is where we see the most impact, right? So our projects in EMEA and Asia are less impacted by that phenomenon. So that's an area where we certainly expect it to resume to mid-single-digit or better growth. But that's the one where we would say that's probably a second half phenomenon at this point and then gets us back to kind of our long-term perspective on the blended market.

Okay. That's a lot of color.

Yes. And Chris, sorry, just one last thing to add. Obviously. If you look at those as market growth rates, but expect to do a little better, right, with commercial execution, so slightly better than those rates there.

Understood. Okay. A lot of good color there.

Our next question comes from Hamed Khorsand from BWS Financial.

Could you just be a little bit more specific as to your -- the cost levers that you pulled in the quarter? And why is it that you waited until revenue is starting to slow to pull those levers instead of in a good environment?

Yes. So good question, Hamir. And obviously right. I would say if you look at our trajectory for the last 12 quarters, we certainly have improved EBITDA continuously, right? So it's not a matter of not. I think the way to think about it really is we are responding to a changing market environment, right? So 1 year ago, our spending profile was linked to a market environment that supported a certain growth rate. And so we flexed our spending to grow slower than that, but help us continue to support that growth rate. When we are faced with a change in external circumstance on market and customer spending, I think it's responsible for us to respond to maintain our commitments on profitability and EBITDA. So the nature of reductions, I think, obviously, if revenue is less, it saves us on commissions and partners and rebates and all of that, discretionary events and marketing and other spending, we basically deferred it to outer quarters when it is more in line with where we see growth and actually customer receptivity to that translating into pipeline and spending. And I think on the R&D side, it's more continuing to be more and more sharper on what our portfolio focus is. And I fully expect that as revenue improves, we will continue investing in those priorities, but now they will be even more aligned, right, with long-term goals for us.

Okay. And then has the average sales or request for decline in the quarter?

Sorry - average, no. If anything, it's improved. I mean that in our margins, but it's not a meaningful improvement. I think it does expected.

Yes, it's not a deterioration in the packet size or sales size.

Yes. We weren't getting pressure in competitive situations. We were just seeing delays. And the size of the spend is not really declining either from the customers, they're still spending the same amount, just taking longer?

Okay. And then as far as the -- your commentary about the sequential improvement, what gives you the confidence that you could see that further into Q3 and Q4 given the hiccup that happened in January.

Yes. So I mean, I think that's a good question. And we -- I think if you connect back, right, our sales cycle is 6 to 8 months, typically in big deals, it's on the longer side. And that is the reason why when we were looking at Q4 pipeline and projected like deals coming out and when and which customers and region, that is when we have started seeing concern about Q1 and the environment, right? So right now, when we look at our customer mix and pipeline as it is projected out into Q3, Q4, certainly Q3, we have higher confidence that, that is based on a broad set of customers and solutions and not driven by one region or one product per se, right? So I think as we have continued to diversify with more security-led sales we think that, that continues to add to our confidence where a lot of the wins could be in EMEA or Asia or Japan, right, as well.

Our next question comes from Ana Odometer your line is now open. Please go ahead. Q – Unidentified Analyst: All right. Good afternoon. This is Stefan Gianni. So it's strong. Can you go over...

Very well. Yes. Q – Unidentified Analyst: My first question is, has the customer sentiment change over the past couple of weeks.

So yes, let me see if I can answer the question. Customer sentiment behavior over the last number of weeks. So entering into Q2, have we seen a change. I'd say what we have seen is a little bit more clarity around budget cycle. I think as we walked through Q1, we were having a difficult time on visibility into customers' budgeting cycles just because of delays in their own processes. I think now we're seeing a lot more clarity and visibility also to Hamid's point, what's different now versus the last quarter. I think we have a little bit better visibility. We think the pipeline is shaping up pretty nicely to deliver on our internal plans over the next few quarters. But that's really the biggest shift that we've seen this quarter. It's just a little bit more visibility and clarity coming out of the budget cycles our customers have gone through...

Yes. And I think, Brian, a good point. And just to add, typically, we would have had that clarity in January or February, but with a lot of the customers themselves going through size reduction and other events, those got pushed out to where there was not that clarity is that normal time, right? And we are seeing a little more of that now. Q – Unidentified Analyst: And can you speak about your capital allocation priorities?

Sure. Unchanged really largely. We continue to look at our priorities. We want to fund organic growth, first and foremost. We're looking long term to ensure that we continue to hit the growth targets that we've outlined in our Investor Day presentation back in February of 2022. Obviously, things are shaping up a little bit differently in this year. But again, investing in organic growth is first priority. Second is to return value to shareholders and employees through repurchases and dividends, which continues. As I mentioned, Board approved another $0.06 dividend for this quarter. And then lastly, we're always being opportunistic about what we do with our cash on hand. Q – Unidentified Analyst: Thank you.

At this time, we have no further questions. So I'll hand back to Drew Patravedi for any further remarks.

Thank you, and thank you to all of our shareholders for joining us today and for your ongoing support. Thanks.

Thank you for joining today's call. You may now disconnect your lines.