Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. I’m Mark Francois, Senior Director of Investor Relations for Alphatec Spine. Thank you for joining us today for Alphatec’s conference call to discuss our Second Quarter 2012 Financial Results. Speaking today will be Alphatec’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Les Cross, and Mike O'Neill, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Also on the call is Ebun Garner, our Chief -- General Counsel. During our prepared remarks you will be in a listen-only mode. After our prepared remarks have concluded, we’ll open up the call for your questions. As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded today August 7, 2012 and a replay of the event will be available later today on our website and will remain on the website for the next 30 days. Before I turn the call over to Les, I must remind you that today’s conference call contains forward-looking statements made under the Safe Harbor provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, such statements relate to the Company’s operational initiatives, product development activities, sales and marketing strategies, and projections for 2012 and sales and operating results. Adjusted EBITDA growth, net earnings and economic and commercial market conditions are also part of the forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on the Company’s current expectations and are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that could cause the actual results to materially differ from the forward-looking statements. The company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Many of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions are discussed in our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, filed on March 5, 2012 with the Securities and Exchange Commission as well as our other filings on Form 10-Q and periodic filings on Form 8-K. Our SEC documents are readily available on our website at www.alphatecspine.com. And with that, I’ll turn the call over to Les.

Thank you, Mark. Good day, everyone, and welcome to Alphatec Spine’s second quarter 2012 conference call. The second quarter of 2012 marks my first complete quarter as the Company’s new CEO. When I became the CEO of Alphatec earlier this year, I set a clear agenda to strengthen the sales and profitability of our organization. And these decisions were based on my years of success at DJO, where I led the company’s turnaround in 2002 and continued the global expansion of the company until my retirement in 2011. In a short period of time, we have accomplished a great deal to help us build a new foundation that should strengthen our future revenue growth and continuously improve our profit margins. I did not expect the Company to transform itself in a single quarter. I do however continued to expect the company to achieve measurable progress each quarter with our initiatives to drive global sales growth and strengthen our margin structure. We’ve executed well against many of our corporate initiatives in Q2 and in this context our second quarter was successful. So what we’ve done in Q2 -- so what have we done in Q2 to change the momentum of Alphatec moving forward? First, we need to stimulate sales growth. Throughout my career I have successfully scaled businesses through acquisition of companies and new products to accelerate top-line growth and improve profitability. I’m pleased to announce that in Q2, we acquired the exclusive U.S. distribution rights to sell under our own label a patent-protected and FDA-cleared synthetic biologic product for use in posterolateral spinal fusions. This synthetic biologic has demonstrated success in clinical studies and in surgical cases. We believe the product’s addition positions Alphatec’s biological portfolio as one of the most comprehensive in the industry. Synthetic bone materials are rapidly…

Thank you, Les. The following remarks are related to our reported operating performance for the quarter ended June 30, 2012. With regards to our Q2 sales results, as is widely recognized spine markets continue to be challenged by lower pricing and declining procedure volumes. Given these market conditions, our second quarter sales results were similar to those of our first quarter this year. Global net revenues totaled $48.2 and compared sequentially to the $48.5 million for the first quarter of this year with foreign exchange rates accounting for the difference. Compared to the second quarter of 2011, a strong quarter for Alphatec and a difficult comparison period consolidated net revenues for the second quarter of 2012 were down 5.2% or 3.6% on a constant currency basis. U.S. net revenues totaled $32.9 million slightly higher sequentially as in Q1 of this year and was driven by continued growth within our cervical line of products including Trestle Luxe and our Biologics portfolio, which again achieved strong year-over-year and sequential quarter growth. International net revenues totaled $15.3 million and continued to benefit from strong sales growth in Japan in spite of absorbing an 8% reimbursement decrease, that was mandated by the Japanese government at the beginning of April 1 this year. As Les mentioned, though U.S. sales also benefited from the addition of several new distributors in Europe. Although weaknesses in other geographies including certain countries in Europe continue to offset the progress we’re making. Overall, on a constant currency basis, international net revenues for the second quarter of 2012 were lower by approximately 1% as compared to the second quarter of 2011. Gross profit for Q2, 2012 was $30.2 million or 62.6% of revenue compared to $29.9 million or 58.7% of revenue in Q2, 2011. The gross margin improvement of 390 basis…

Great. Thank you, Mike. In closing the transformation of Alphatec Spine continues to progress. We believe that we are making solid progress to strengthen our revenue and operating performance. You should expect this to continue to increase our global reach with new distributors in the U.S. and beyond. You should expect this to continue to focus on a continuous flow of new products to assist in our revenue growth. You should expect this to continue to focus on driving down costs in our manufacturing facility, and lastly the financing of our credit facility and the establishment of the equity credit line has strengthened my ability to capitalize on the Spine markets consolidation that it's going through providing us with the flexibility to scale Alphatec as we find interesting, accretive acquisitions of company’s or product lines. So with that said, I’d like to ask Patrick to open the line for questions. Thank you.

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Raj Denhoy from Jefferies.

This is Amy in for Raj. I guess, if I could just start off with the U.S. business, it did take us a bit of -- it flattened and it was sequentially flat and I know Xenon was called out as one of the factors limiting growth in Q1, and getting that back on the market. Can you talk a little bit more about what factors may have influenced growth in the U.S.?

Sorry. Yes, so the area that we were pleased about in Q1, was our overall our biologics business continues to do well. However, I think it’s fair to say that in our core hospital business, we said we clearly saw some pressures that we hadn’t seen as much in previous quarters. We do keep a very close eye on pricing and I will say that while we saw a slight deterioration in pricing in our hospital business in Q2, it wasn’t something that was dramatically out of line. So, it was low single-digits, if you look at the year-over-year comparison. I think our -- some areas of that business that are doing well, having less alluded to Trestle Luxe which continues to perform well in the marketplace, but albeit obviously we have our existing Trestle business. Illico continues to perform well and I think some of our inner body business has been under pressure in Q2 most of them we saw in Q1. So a mix bag from my perspective, and I think that -- I think we can attribute it to some internal issues as well as the overall category dynamics. But, I think, I mean clearly looking at our line-up of distributors and the fact that we’re identifying and signing-up some additional distributors is an indication that we’re not happy with the underlying performance.

And then maybe one on operating expenses. Those I believe you attributed largely to increased legal cost, but those took a step-up this quarter. Is this in with new R&D, with the OsseoFix trial starting up soon, should we expect some OpEx to run at this rate moving forward for the rest of the year or perhaps take a little bit of a step-down as operational -- if with all your cost saving efforts pulling into place?

Yes, so I think I would say that overall, for example in the area of R&D we were comfortable with the level of expense. Having said that, we’re going to see an increase in our clinical trial costs. So that needs to be factored in. I think overall in the G&A area, I would like to think it was a bit of a high watermark and we’re actually taking steps to reduce some of those costs as we stair out to the rest of the year. So, I would expect it to come down as we go forward from here.

Okay, great. And just one last one on Solus inventory. I know last quarter I think you guys talked about that there wouldn’t be any write-off of any substance regarding Solus inventory, yet this quarter it was a pretty substantial inventory write-down. Does that right-size any outstanding Solus inventory or should we expect to see any further write-offs moving forward?

Yes, so I think that obviously what we communicated on the last call was we didn’t anticipate any write-offs of any substance, and that’s fair. At that point in time we had not completed the final field failure analysis of Solus. And it wasn’t until we got through that, the decision was taken that, not only would we end up having to redesign the instruments, we would have to do some redesign on the implant as well. Given the fact that we had curtailed and our instrument investments have been modest. The vast majority of this write-off was associated with the existing inventories that were no longer able to use. So, I think at this point in time, I realize it’s a hollow promise, I do not anticipate any additional Solus write-offs. But, we’re still going through the redesign and getting it ready for launch. But at this point in time, no. I think we’re done.

Our next question comes from Matt Dolan from Roth Capital.

First question is on guidance. Just looking into the second half of the year, it’s been -- looking over the past several years there’s typically a seasonal downtick here in Q3, which at the mid-point would suggest a big tip up in Q4. So, can you walk us through what the assumption there, that market share gains, just a little more color on the pacing of the year would be helpful.

Yes, so I think -- so combinations of adding new distributors in the U.S. as well as outside the U.S. so we added some late and they’re continuing to perform in Q3. Continuing to focus on Luxe and Illico specifically as products that we believe are making a meaningful difference in the marketplace. And as we think about some of the challenges we have had in Q2, we also want to be able to -- my phraseology is, regain some share. I think it is not just a category issue. And I think that Les articulated in the call earlier about the acquisition of a new synthetic. We do have some 2012 business that’s now included in there as well. So, we’re quite well aware of the Q3, Q4 splits and certainly the seasonality specifically will impact us in Europe, but we’re comfortable with the range that we have and given the new product activity and the new distributor activity.

Okay. So does Q3 come down from a Q2 level though in aggregate revenue?

No. Not finding that at this point.

Okay. And then on the acquisitions, is there any more color we can get in terms of the magnitude of revenue that’s being contributed from either these deals and how that will be funded?

So I think in 2013, if I think about the bigger of the 2 deals, I think that in order for us to feel comfortable talking about it today, we believe it’s going to add meaningful revenue in 2013. Material for us is to find the 10% of our business. We’re not quite at that level but we believe in the outer years that there’s going to be a meaningful contribution for us on top-line as well as accretive in 2013 on the bottom line. In terms of how we pay for it; by virtue of accretive we’re obviously looking at over the bias towards issuing stock to pay for the deals, and to the extent that there is a cash contribution, we’re handling some of those cash requirements with either the extended credit facility that we’ve just got or also using some of the equity line that we got into at the end of Q1. So, I think that that’s how we’re looking at some of these proposals.

Okay. So they’re within the means of those 2 items. And just, for a point of clarity, accretive you’re saying is defined as additive to EBITDA, not on a per-share basis?

It's additive to EBITDA in absolute dollars and its additive to the earnings on a per share basis. Thank you.

Our next question comes from Matt Miksic from Piper Jaffray.

So changes in the competition and sort of the competitive landscape in the quarter. You mentioned a number of things sort of impacting your growth, product oriented and otherwise. But, I am wondering, maybe Les, as you look at this business it was sort of another sort of sideways quarter, it looked and its growing below the market. You’re talking about adding new distributors, but some of the sort of key products, differentiated products that you’re looking to drive the business is still kind of out a few quarters. Just how do you think about your competitive positioning in the market. How do you move the needle when you’re sort of -- how do you attract distributors when you have a bag of products that sort of -- that needs to be kind of restarted or invigorated? And I have couple of follow-ups.

Yes, well, Matt, I am not sure I agree with the descriptions of product range. It’s clear that we -- we have self inflicted wounds from not getting some of the new products out there, but Trestle Luxe is doing incredibly well. Illico is the most successful product we have on a global basis, and in fact we’re flat out here really trying to supply the global demands of those 2 products. So, we definitely have competitive advantages there. Our biologic products continues to grow; very, very, very well actually. And now having this synthetic really gives us a very complete offering that actually will help us attract new distributors. The distributors that are coming to us are being disrupted by the merges that are happening in the marketplace. So, these are good quality distributors being displaced by companies merging and they actually look at our product line and see it is quite a competitive product line and are happy to come over and join us. So, the product range we offer today is competitive. It would be better if the Solus in the world had to come out on time, but it didn’t. But, I think the process we’re putting in and the people we’re putting in place will accelerate the launch of new products and will give us a continuous flow of new products starting really at the end of Q3 and will go right through 2013. Competitive prices, our problems as I say have been self inflicted by not getting some of these products out on time, and I really think that’s part of what you’re seeing in our numbers and that we have a process implant to fix.

So it’s the -- anticipation of these things coming later in the year, the synthetics, bone graft, having that in place as you say heading into next year, that prospect is enough to sort of, to bring on the folks that you feel that you need?

It’s enough for them to come on, and be side of it, but as I say Illico and Trestle Luxe aren’t products to be minimized. They’re both very, very successful, high quality, innovative products and yes these distributors are happy to join us and trust me they can shop. When a distributor wants to move, they have other options and as we say a number of them in this last quarter have chosen us. I am sorry, if you see that as a very positive sign.

Okay, that’s fair. And then, I was wondering impact in the quarter, in -- I have to bring out another sore subject, but the trend of physician on distributorships in a market seems to be kind of flat. I am wondering if you are still in the process of -- is that a flat part of your business, is it a part of your business that you’re sort of tightening around and did it have any impact in the quarter? And then I have just one follow-up if I could.

So the physician on groups it’s kind of regional. In some areas I would say it’s gone backwards and in some other areas it’s growing. So, until its ruling I think they will continue to be a fact of life until the government steps in. Our sales because you remember we put in a policy of, exactly the kind of physician on distributorships that we would do business with. And so we don’t do business with a lot regardless of what our competitors say. Our POD business is declining, but in some areas it is only increased for sure, but unless they meet our code of conduct standards we don’t do business with them.

But in total you’d say it’s declining?

Yes, I mean we’ve been very public that it’s meaningfully less than 10% of our revenue on a quarter-to-quarter basis, and our Q2 contribution from those channels of trades are down versus prior-year.

That’s helpful and then just if I could, one -- just an update on pricing. Any significant change that you saw on a quarter, are we still in that sort of down mid single-digit range? Any update there would be helpful.

So year-over-year U.S. Hospital we were down low single-digits, and that’s been -- that’s where we have been for the last couple of quarters, and we had some modest price declines in Q2 over Q1 sequentially. I think that there has been certainly some anecdotal information coming in that there is pricing pressure building up again, but obviously that’s a forward looking impact as opposed to or compared to a prior period. So, I think that pricing continues to be generally downward trend in mid single-digits on an annual basis.

Our next question comes from Josh Jennings from Cowen and Company.

Just a follow-up on the POD question that was presented earlier and it is understanding that the OIG advisory opinion and potential Senate Finance Committee hearing on PODs, it has been pushed out and they’ll actually be taken prior to the election and most likely on to the first half of next year. I guess first, is that what you’re hearing as well, and then secondarily, can you just give us an idea of what your expectations are in terms of the role PODs will play in the spine industry over the next 5 years and if there is an increasing role are you willing to increase your exposure if the government doesn’t deemed POD violating anti-kickback statutes in the senate and thus inappropriate?

Well, so how long is a piece of string, right? Yes, we agree that the regulatory -- we’re hearing the same news about the -- when the government is actually going to rule on this like everything else, I guess it’s going to have to wait till after the elections. Hospitals are refusing to do business with PODs. I think if anything is probably a growth barrier to PODs is the fact that hospitals don’t want to do business with them, they see the conflict. So, I think PODs will be in the day surgery center. I think the physicians running surgery centers will form PODs, but the large customers we’re seeing a movement for those large customers not to want to do business with PODs. So I think that will limit the growth of it to some degree. And we’re happy to do business with a POD that meets our code of conduct which we have discussed on previous calls.

I think if you want to step forward in time, I think none of us really have a line of sight as to what it will look like in 5 years. I think that there is a fair amount of belief that various kinds of business models are going to be tried and tested, and some of them will morph into accountable care organizations or the, such and I think that, that’s where we’re likely to see the changes happening in the future. I think that those organizations that we wanted to do business with, I think they’re not long for this planet, but I think that there are opportunities for the industry to reinvent business models that can accommodate the concerns of every stakeholder.

That’s insightful, I appreciate it. Just on the reimbursement landscape to understanding that the Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Minnesota for the last couple of months it should have a relatively restrictive reimbursement proposal for Lumbar Fusion procedures. Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Michigan recently instituted the restrictive policies, so I mean, do you have any insight into the potential of the Minnesota, Blue Cross/Blue Shield proposal being reversed and any knowledge of any other negative proposals that are out there and then just lastly, how would you characterize your reimbursement landscape, deteriorating, improving or so stabilizing?

Well, so obviously on deformity and cervical trauma and tumor kind of spine surgery reimbursements are fairly constant and that’s a lot of areas where we’re focusing our growth as a company for that reason. It seems that physicians, patients and insurance companies are starting to find some common ground to what kind of patients will be approved for Lumbar Fusion and what the indications are and I think that’s where we’re heading. I think Minnesota obviously people are lobbying on that, and we’ll have to wait and see what happens. There’s no doubt it's the pendulum swing, I think there were too many procedures done and it’s given the insurance companies a bit of a stick to hit the industry with the patients that need this, on going anywhere. They will eventually get treated.

[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Bill Plovanic from Canaccord.

So couple of questions. One, Mike just doing some back of the napkin math about the $800,000 impact from FX in the quarter?

Yes.

Okay. And then on the severance, the $500,000 over 12 months will that be accrued over the 12 months or is that to hit all in Q3?

It will be hit in Q3.

Okay. And then, how much debt do you have on the books at the end of Q2?

$34 million, $35 million.

Okay. So about $35 million?

Yes.

$34 million, $35 million plus they are pretty un-buffered [ph]. And then …

Yes, I mean, there is other stuff in the long-term liabilities, right. So …

Right. That’s what I’m trying to figure out, and then what’s the interest rate you’re now paying on that, just to remind us.

6.25%.

6.25%, down from 12%, right?

It wasn’t that high, no. That’s very old information.

Oh sorry. And then just...

I appreciate that.

Yes. As you bring in new distributors, so it looks better 6.25% versus 12% looks a lot better. As you bring in new distributors, Les, and you negotiate with these folks, I think is this something or what is the going rate on distributors these days? Are we at the 30% to 40% level or is this 50% plus for the first 6 months type of stuff, kind of where are we, as we’re talking at pendulum swinging in terms of paying for distribution these days.

Yes. So, we don’t pay any rates high that’s what you described. We sometimes do -- the rates tend to be in the 20%, now 24% range. I’m just looking to make sure everyone agrees with me. So that 20% to 24% we do sometimes pay bonuses for people to come over or guarantee a period of their royalty, but our long-term commitment is in the 20s not in the 30s or 40s.

Okay. That’s helpful. And then just on your updated guidance, I think previously you thought it would be cash flow positive for the year, excluding the acquisitions you talked about, I take it, that’s off the table this year?

No, I think that the upper end of the revenue range, I think there when cash flow positive is absolutely the objective. I think if as we scale back to that revenue range, it’s clearly going to be a challenge. But I think part of the issue that we need to feel comfortable with in terms of some of the expense management that we need going forward is obviously going to free up some cash as well. But I do believe that it’s a scale within the revenue range at the high-end we’re fine at the bottom end it’s a bit of challenge.

And what do you need to happen to meet that high-end of the revenue range?

I think that the new products need to continue to be, to grow with their acceptance. I think that we need a very positive adoption with some of our distributors as we go into Q3 and Q4. And I think that we need to have some successes internationally in various regions of the world where we’ve been a little bit hand strong in Q2 and we’ve really got to be able to drive some quality business in Q3 and Q4.

Okay. And then the Illico and IDE for OsseoFix, conditional approval what does conditional approval mean?

It means the study is approved to treat the 400 patients I think it was, and then submit the results to the FDA and at that stage they will decide whether to approve the product or not.

Okay. But there is no other condition, it's just you already...

The protocol [indiscernible] approved.

The [indiscernible].

The protocol, the results that demonstrate the effectiveness of the product. We would expect to get approval at that time.

Okay. And then I think in your commentary you talked about some legal expenses being a little higher this quarter for litigation. Any clarity on what that is, and I think you said you top ticked G&A or this was the high watermark?

Yes, so it’s a combination, it wasn’t all litigation. It was litigation plus some legal cost on the financing side of the business. We’re not going to get specifically into any cases, but I think into Amy’s question earlier, I think it represents the high watermark for operating expenses for the year and the quarter. And I’m not expecting it to continue for the rest of this year.

But is there anything incremental in sales and marketing because that kind of ticked up as well?

Some of the incremental in sales and marketing, so one of the things that we have is, we had a very heavy quarter internationally with conventions and trade shows. So we had a number of big conventions and scientific symposia where we had a lot of people and attendance and as we went through the accruals in Q2 it was quite an investment that frankly from a timing perspective, I don’t see that happening internationally for the remainder of the year.

This ends our Q&A session for today. I will turn it back to Les Cross.

Great. Thank you very much, Patrick. Well, I hope it's clear to everyone on the call that we’re in the middle of transforming Alphatec Spine and by that I mean accelerating the top-line growth, leveraging this new expand space that we’re putting in place and continuing to drive our cost side of our product. And we expect to make significant progress in all those fronts in Q3 and again in Q4 and we certainly will keep you up to date with this exciting acquisition that the team is working on. Thank you everybody.

Ladies and gentlemen, thanks for participating in today’s program. This concludes the program. You may all disconnect.