Greetings, and welcome to the Astec Industries Fourth Quarter 2013 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Steve Anderson. Thank you. Mr. Anderson, you may begin.

Thank you, Christine. Good morning, and welcome to the Astec Industries conference call for the fourth quarter and fiscal year that ended December 31, 2013. As Christine mentioned, my name is Steve Anderson, and I'm the Vice President of Administration and Secretary and Director of Investor Relations for the company. Also in today's call are Benjamin G. Brock, our President and Chief Executive Officer; Richard Dorris, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer; and David Silvious, our Chief Financial Officer. In just a moment, I'll turn the call over to David to summarize our financial results and then to Ben to review our business activity during the fourth quarter. Before we begin, I'll remind you that our discussion this morning may contain forward-looking statements that relate to the future performance of the company, and these statements are intended to qualify for the Safe Harbor liability established by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. Any such statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Factors that could influence our results are highlighted in today's financial news release and others are contained in our annual report and our filings with the SEC. As usual, we ask that you familiarize yourself with those factors. At this point, I'll turn the call over to David to summarize our financial results for the fourth quarter and the full year of 2013. David?

All right. Thanks, Steve. Thank you everyone for joining us this morning. I will run through the financial analysis quickly here. For the quarter, our net sales were $223.9 million in Q4 of '13 compared to $227.6 million in Q4 of '12. That is a decrease of 1.6% or $3.7 million. International sales for the Q4 of '13 was $81.5 million compared to $98.6 million in Q4 of '12. Now that is a decrease of 17.4% or $17.1 million in international sales. International sales were 36.4% of our Q4 net sales compared to 43.3% of Q4 of '12 net sales. The decrease in international sales for Q4 of '13 compared to Q4 of '12 occurred primarily in Mexico, Australia, Africa, Asia, India and the Middle East. Those decreases in those geographic areas were offset primarily by increases in the post-Soviet states. Domestic sales for the fourth quarter of '13 were $142.4 million compared to $129 million in the fourth quarter of '12. It's an increase of 10.4% or $13.4 million. Domestic sales were 63.6% of Q4 '13 net sales compared to 56.7% of Q4 of '12 net sales. Parts sales for the fourth quarter of '13 were $56.8 million, and that compares to $58.1 million for the fourth quarter of '12. That's a 2.2% decrease or $1.3 million. Parts sales were 25.4% of quarterly sales in Q4 of '13 compared to 25.5% of net sales in Q4 of '12. On a year-to-date basis, sales were $933 million compared to $936.3 million for 2012. That's just a slight decrease of $3.3 million. International sales on a year-to-date basis in '13 were $333.9 million compared to $363.8 million in 2012. That's a decrease of 8.2% or $29.9 million. The decrease on a year-to-date basis in international sales occurred primarily in Australia, Canada,…

Thank you, David. Ben Brock is now going to provide comments regarding the fourth quarter of this year's operations and will offer some thoughts going forward. Ben?

Thank you, Steve, and thank you, everyone, for joining us on the call today. If we were to be asked to summarize our feelings about the fourth quarter in one word, the word would be mixed. Sales were down 1.6% versus the same period last year, although our earnings per share on continuing operations were at $0.36 versus $0.24 in the fourth quarter of 2012. If we were to be asked to summarize our feelings about our results for 2013 in a word, the word would be improving. Sales were basically flat versus 2012, and our earnings per share from continuing operations were $1.69 versus $1.48 for all of 2012. And our backlog was up 10% versus 2012. And while it was a mixed quarter for us, overall, despite the increase in earnings, we did experience a year of improvement as a whole, and we're encouraged about opportunities to improve internally going ahead. I'll talk a little bit more about that here later. But it's probably going to sound like the movie Groundhog Day to everybody on the call, but the reality is that the uncertainty created by representatives in Washington, D.C. continues to make our domestic highway infrastructure customers feel uneasy about their major capital expenditures. And this uncertainty remains in place despite the fact that those same customers are seeing marginal improvement in their private sectors. We're hearing rumors from contacts in industry traders organizations that the Highway Bill is at least being discussed in Washington now. And while we would absolutely welcome a long-term bill with increased funding, we're not sitting back and waiting on one. We're pursuing new business with new products in the United States, and we're working to grow our international effort. The best example of our new products is the start-up of the…

Okay. Thank you, Ben. We'll start the Q&A session of our call now, and Christine will open up the queue for the Q&A. [Operator Instructions] So at this point, Christine, if you would open up the first question, we would appreciate it.

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Jack Kasprzak with BB&T. John F. Kasprzak - BB&T Capital Markets, Research Division: First question is just on SG&A. In the fourth quarter, it was down in dollars. It was also down in the third quarter. I know you're going to have ConExpo expenses in Q1. But excluding that, is the run rate of SG&A now closer to the $36 million, $37 million per-quarter range?

Yes. We noted that the main drivers there were R&D, and that was a big one for the year. And so I think we had a huge R&D push on these pelletizers and other related or other similar products that we were pushing over '09, '10 and '11. And so that run rate got up there, but we are bringing that back down somewhat. I think we're targeting something less than what we've been spending on R&D. John F. Kasprzak - BB&T Capital Markets, Research Division: Second question is, you guys made a lot of comments on what you're seeing in the market and the outlook, which is appreciated. As noted, your Q4 sales are about flat. Your sales for the full year '13 are kind of flat with 2012, given where the backlog is and maybe a little better private tone, I mean, do you think '14 we'll see a little bit more meaningful sales growth opportunity versus what we've seen for the last couple of years?

Jack, this is Ben. We would say yes, it'd be up slightly. Of course, the pellet plant orders are a little larger than an asphalt plant order, and we're going to obviously be pushing that pretty hard to try to get another one in this year if we can. The activity on that is good. I was at a pellet conference last week, and the projections for the needs of pellets are still high. So -- and we do have customers coming to the site to see the plant in the coming weeks. So yes, we would think that there's an opportunity it'd be up slightly here this year.

Our next question comes from the line of Mig Dobre with Robert W. Baird. Joseph M. Grabowski - Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, Research Division: This is Joe Grabowski, sitting in for Mig. Just want to confirm then on the $20 million to $22 million of revenue for the wood pellet plant, none of that was recognized in the fourth quarter. And maybe kind of walk us through how it's going to be recognized over the next 24 months.

Yes, sure. Absolutely. Thanks, John. We will confirm that was not recognized in the fourth quarter, number one. Number two, we are looking at essentially recognizing on an installment basis as we go forward. The facts and the circumstances, being what they are with us financing and things of that nature. So new product, we wanted to get it out there. It's a business decision, and we will be recommending revenue on an installment basis. And then, customers certainly working on -- as we said, we're doing the installation and construction financing. Customers working on permanent financing. And so as the facts change, then we'll follow the accounting rules and recognize the revenue. Joseph M. Grabowski - Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, Research Division: Okay. That makes sense. And then on the $40 million of add-on orders, do you expect those to be financed also? And how do you expect those revenues to be recognized?

I think it will be in a similar fashion right now. Unless the facts change, I think it'll be treated similarly. Joseph M. Grabowski - Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, Research Division: Okay. And do you know when those $40 million of additional revenues will begin to be recognized? Will they fall into '14? Or when will they at least start?

We'll probably start to recognize some in late '14. We've got it -- we'll have to get it in and get it up and running. But it went very well going in this -- in the last year, so we expect it to go as well with -- we have a history of putting it up. We think it will go well this year for those 2 lines. Joseph M. Grabowski - Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, Research Division: Okay. And then on the Army plant that I think was going to -- the Asphalt Army plant that was going to be recognized in the first quarter of '14. Is that still going to come through?

No. I have some general frustrations with our United States Army from a supplying to them standpoint that our lift has delayed again. It's going to be hopefully this next few weeks according to our guys. And they also have the option in the contract to delay the taking of it. So we think at this stage that they will take it in August. And I hate to say, more to come, but it seems like that's how it is with them. It's -- that is $6 million in revenue now at that point. So it's not very big, but it's there. It hasn't been recognized. Joseph M. Grabowski - Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, Research Division: And then last question for me, and then I'll jump back in queue. It seems like the orders in the fourth quarter in the Aggregate and Mining Group were stronger than they had been trending in the last few quarters. Just was wondering where you're seeing the strength in that group.

Part of what you're seeing there is they have their national dealer event, and you've seen some deal orders come across. And so that's mostly what you see in that. Although we did have some good orders on major quarries, one down in Oklahoma and one in Pennsylvania. So we have seen some other orders outside of that, but the bigger driver of that was more in the dealer order side.

Our next question comes from the line of Jason Ursaner with CJS Securities.

On the wood pellet plant, as you begin to recognize revenue, what do you expect the margin to be as it comes in?

It actually is going to be at a normal equipment margin, major equipment margin. So for us, it's mid-20s to 22s-ish.

And I guess, my understanding was the punch press had been part of the, I guess, challenge on getting it out and getting the margin off to where you want it. Over time, are you still working on that piece of it? And where do you expect the margin to keep moving higher? Or that's kind of at a final margin on where you should expect wood pellet in the future?

Well, on the press side, we decided to go with an outside vendor. So the press will not affect margin going ahead at all. That's the only piece of the plant that we won't be building going ahead. So we are using a press out of Germany, the call press.

Okay. And then -- but so the rest of the system. Is there still room to be improving it? Or did you get all of it kind of out on the prototype? Or is there still room for improvement on margin?

Jason, again, this is still Ben. I would say we have room to improve margin on it. And we typically see that on any new product, the first one's will come out a little bit lower margin. And then we improve them over time as we get some repetition. And to tell you that every single thing fit when it got to the site would probably not be the truth, but what didn't fit was very easily fixed. So it went very well. So we do have room to improve as we go ahead.

Okay. And then overall, as you're thinking about growth for '14, you talked a little bit about the volume side and where you can expect orders. What are you seeing on the pricing side? And then I guess, maybe in particular, on the Mobile Asphalt, the gross margin there was a bit lower. So was that a pricing issue? Or is that maybe more selling out of inventory where you had manufacturing causing that?

Well, that's a good question. I'll tell you -- and I think everybody sitting around the table would agree with this -- that it was a very tough market last year, and it was a tough year. I mean, when you look at our results, we feel pretty encouraged about them because we do see pricing pressure, particularly in the Mobile Group. They have some strong European competition and then they've got some competitors that are doing a lot of rent-to-own through their dealer networks. So we have seen that pressure, and we've worked through the Tier 4 part. And in most of our iron that's coming out of the Mobile Group now is through the Tier 4 process. So we do expect to see margins get a little better on that -- in that group. But certainly, they faced a lot of pricing pressure, particularly, also with the rent-to-own market. Although I would add that we do feel like our pavers are gaining market share. We're doing a nice job with it. It's in -- and the new pavers have been well received.

Got it. Okay. And then just last -- The other group, you had a pretty significant increase in sales, but at a little bit lower margins. Wondering what went into there whether it was Peterson or Australia.

It was...

Definitely Peterson.

Yes, it was definitely Peterson. We did have and we talked about it in the comments there, Jason, on the sales that we were down little bit in Australia, which is where it is the market for Astec Australia. So Peterson had a good quarter.

Australia is really -- with the mining being off a little bit down there, that's where it's been more of a struggle. The Aussie dollar has been not as good, but it's still in range. I mean, we should be okay once it comes back, and we do have some activity there now.

Our next question comes from the line of Ted Grace with Susquehanna.

Then maybe if we could start with the AMG group. I mean, very solid incrementals at 59%, if my math is right. Somewhat robust top line. But can you just walk through from a profitability of the margin standpoint kind of what really helped that and then -- and start at that point?

Well, I think when you talk about that group, it's a straightforward product mix and volume. They've been blessed with backlog and knowing what's ahead of them and what they've sold has been pretty well wheelhouse equipment. So they have been in the right places at the right time on the sales side. So that is really -- that's pretty the major part what's driven their success.

I think David mentioned earlier in the call that the large screens were part of the mixed benefit there. But specifically, can you just highlight what products were you referring to just for clarity sake?

Sure, Ted. Their track-mounted sales have been very good and their conveyor sales have been good, and that's -- the track-mounted would be site-specific crushing or screening. And that may be where you get to pick it up on the screen side. They've just -- they've done well of getting screens to help size materials that maybe they needed to size but they weren't. We had one that was in a mining opportunity where they had some overburden that they couldn't get sized right, and they had to get a screen out there. So it's just one example of a lot of them that -- those are the main products: the tracks, and that would be crushers and screens, and then track-mounted conveyors alone.

Okay. And just for clarity's sake again, when we say mining, are we talking kind of conventional mining? Are we talking quarries and aggregates?

That would've been -- well, when I say mine, that would be like opening up traditional mining where they would bring in track-mounted crushers to open the mine. Or to sometimes, well, they have the track-mounted crushers for -- they've got a lease agreement on a mine and they need to go over with the portable crusher spread to have some production out of that mine. And then if we talk aggregates and when say quarries, then we're getting in the -- when I say it, we're in the quarries and the traditional rock for infrastructure building materials.

Okay. And then on the order front, a nice quarter in December. Can you just kind of highlight where the strength was either by end market or geography? Was that more on the aggregate side? Was that a couple of nice mining wins, kind of conventional mining? And how do you -- how would you encourage us to think about 2014 for AMG?

Well, it's mainly -- for them, mainly in the quarry side. That's why we still think we have a pretty good opportunity in the mining side going ahead. And then as far as the regionals, Dave had mentioned some of those in his comments but typically, it's still where there's natural resources like oil and gas that's still okay for us. Still going pretty good.

Okay. And then the last question I'll ask before I get back in queue is you mentioned you were just at the convention for the pellet press industry. Can you just talk about the opportunity, the pipeline that you're seeing now and what you think, how you would encourage investors to kind of calibrate the potential for orders in 2014 -- beyond the 2 you just announced?

Right. Well, they did a projection, and you've got to be careful because you've got consultants giving a lot of projections on tonnages. But one of the presentations was from an Aggborough -- a gentleman from an Aggborough, it's a utility in the U.K. And he was talking about the needs for the pellets, and one of his slides, may have been the guy before him, but he said, "That's about the right number." He said that the demand by 2020, I think it was, would be up to 27 million tons. Of the same slide, he's saying it's quicker than that. And the current -- I guess, the current demands about 5 million tons to 8 million tons, just for the U.K. Now if you did the math on the plants and the size, you would say there'd be 30 to 40 sizable pellet plant sold similar to what's going on at Hazlehurst. It would be 60 tons in our plants that would go in on the equipment side in a $60 million to $70 million range.

Our next question comes from the line of Walter Liptak with Global Hunter.

I wanted to ask about your comments on the road bill and just the timing of it again this year. I imagine we'll hear more about the political will going into the spring. Is that set for a vote over the summer? Or is it in September?

Well, the current bill would run out to the end of September, and it depends on who you talk to. I mean, we get mixed bag as we talk to our representatives. And we talk to associations, and some associations see a pathway to a potential vote in the summer. And then you talk to some, and they'll tell you, "Well, we're looking at maybe 1 or 2 more extensions before a bill." So that's why on the comments, we say our focus is to try, despite the Highway Bill, work on energy mining and where we can sell in infrastructure, keep going and come out with new products because there is work going on. I mean, the private side is coming up a little bit. In the good times, the private side would have been 50% of the hot mix produced. And then the government type would be about 50%. Of course, that dropped off pretty good when the economy turned. Really for us, we kind of saw its turning late '08 and '09. That's coming back a little bit. So that's helping but for the long-term CapEx purchases, they like to see the security of that federal bill. So where we can help is coming out with plants that do more recycle to help them compete with the concrete and that type of thing. And that's what we're focused on for that segment and then keep working on energy and mining.

Okay, great. And then I wanted to ask a question about ConExpo, and it'll be great to see the new products out there. But I remember in prior ConExpos that there was a level of revenue or level of expense that filters through in the first quarter. I wonder if you can give us an idea of what's that spending is going to look like, your SG&A for the coming quarter.

Sure. It's going to be somewhere in the range of $3.7 million to $4 million for our expense out there. And at the same time -- but to me -- when you get out there and you see the effort in what we do with the show, it's probably the right amount and it's the right exposure. And we do have -- we take -- with our decentralized model, we do take a lot of different sales reps that maybe a centralized model wouldn't bring that might have more dealer representations. So with the direct sales effort, we end up bringing more people. And the good thing is, though, like we mentioned in the comments, we've got a good expectations for our tenants and our Mobile Group, particularly, thinks that it could be a good show for them. So we're looking forward to it.

Our next question is a follow-up question from Jack Kasprzak with BB&T. John F. Kasprzak - BB&T Capital Markets, Research Division: Okay. Just a question on order patterns. ConExpo -- in years where you have ConExpo, I think that sometimes it gets a little lumpy in terms of customers waiting and maybe they go to the show and then place an order. Given your comments about order trends so far in the quarter being pretty consistent with what you've already seen, and yes, your backlog what was already up at the end of the year. Are you -- is this a little bit of a different order pattern than you're used to? Maybe over the last 1 or 2 ConExpo shows?

Jack, this is Ben. I would say that as decentralized as we are, we vary by each division even. But I would say, in my history, it seems about the same. No, it doesn't seem over the top. I mean, it's consistent. So yes.

Our next question comes from the line of Barry Haimes with Sage Asset Management.

I had a question relating to road repair, and I know the Highway Bill's an issue. But just in terms of the harsh winter that we've had compared with the mild winter last year and I certainly know by being up in the northeastern roads are pretty beaten up. Is that the kind of thing or you're maybe starting to see some activity or inquiries? Or is it too early? Is there any feel you have for how that harsh weather might impact your business this year?

This is Ben. It's interesting you say that because I can promise you, I've sent a letter to our representatives about what's coming in the spring. Because with the freestyles we had, there will be a lot of potholes, and we've been pretty lucky in the U.S. to have some warm winters in the last 5 or 6 winters. So it could give them a little momentum on the Highway Bill. We've kind of had some hope that, that might, but we haven't seen any orders as a direct result. I mean, I think most of the orders we that are just normal buying, and we haven't seen anything buying because of the weather. But when I wrote the letter, 70% of the United States was under snow cover, and it was going to 80% because we were going to pick up 8 inches of snow the next day, which we did. So it was kind of hit-home-type deal. So you're touching on something that we're trying to talk to our representatives about.

Our next question comes from the line of Jon Evans with JWest.

Can you just talk a little bit about the oil and gas side? So if you're -- I've been on some of the equipment companies, et cetera. They're talking about a more positive North America spend environment, especially with the acceleration in natural gas prices. Can you just maybe help us frame kind of what you're seeing potentially from your customers? And maybe also why you haven't had as much success this year you initially thought you'd have in that business?

Yes, Jon. This is Ben. We would tend to agree with them on our oil and gas heater business. That has continued to be strong. We were at the -- with our sales group in the last couple of weeks that provides the rigs, and our sales quoting is up. But it -- but we do have new technology and that takes a little bit more selling, and we're working on that. So we have great products there, and we're working to get a few of them across the line. But we've seen a little bit of an increase in the quote activity but not the actual sales yet on the rigs. Again, the oil and gas heaters, that's remained good. But we do think as the price goes up, the rig sales will come with it. In the meantime, we've been developing auxiliary equipment to go around the rigs and that would be the pumpers and the tanks that go with them. So that should help us in the long run, too. The other thing to note in the Underground Group is it's not just oil and gas, but we do have a line of water well-drill rigs. And that business is starting to come up, particularly with the private work.

Our next question is a follow-up question from Ted Grace with Susquehanna.

I was hoping to just get some flavor on how we should think about kind of domestic versus international sales as we look forward. International sales are kind of flat sequentially, down year-on-year. The backlog, as you highlighted, was down kind of mid-teens. And so can you just kind of speak to what your outlook is for the businesses, domestic versus international as we head into '14?

Well, we're definitely seeing that on the numbers, our domestic, as a percentage, is up. Europe has just been weak for us, but it seems to be -- again, the Mobile Group and even in the Asphalt that the plant side we're seeing some opportunities now. We would -- we're going to work to get that percentage up this year, Ted. Our goal is to have a much better mix than what we had in this year. And I think the work that they're doing on mobile side that were mentioned in the comments with the AVP of Sales, they're making some headway. And certainly, there -- some of their headway is in Latin America where they have not been strong. So they're starting to see a little bit of a -- I wouldn't say they didn't have a heartbeat, but they're seeing more of a heartbeat. So...

Okay. And then the other thing I was hoping to follow up on is you talked about the conservatism on the Highway Bill and the fact that you're focusing on things you could control. You mentioned that the MAPG Group is optimistic on ConExpo, so I'm assuming that would have a positive read across, at least, some people replacing equipment. But can you speak to just the tone or the sense that you're picking up from talking to both contractors and state DOTs on the uncertainty and how they may react? Because the Highway contract awards, has actually been pretty strong, and I guess, to be curious, to get your sense of -- those numbers are sustainable? Or as we get closer to an expiration, if Highway DOTs start to pull back?

Well, Ted, again, that -- just like when you talk to different divisions of us, it depends on where you are a little bit because somewhere, some places, the states have started to try to take over the funding and get more fund and control more of their destiny. Like Virginia kind of effectively went away from the gas tax and turned it over to a sales tax to generate more revenue. And as that flows through, they're going to have a very nice 5-year run. Pennsylvania went to the wholesale tax with the retail tax on gas. So they've got a potential going ahead pretty good. So there's going to be pockets where that happens and -- there's opportunities where that happens. But as far as the Highway Bill, it's just the longer term. It's just a mill piece, even though the private's up a little bit, and if you're in these states, you feel better. Across the board, there's nothing like a long-term Highway Bill for our customers' feelings.

Our next question is a follow-up question from Mig Dobre with Robert W. Baird. Joseph M. Grabowski - Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, Research Division: It's Joe again. Just a quick follow-up. Was hoping you could talk a little bit about the M&A pipeline and what sort of the deals you might be looking to get done in 2014.

Sure, this is Ben, Joe. We continue to look, and we're looking in the mining and energy and infrastructure areas. We're not looking to get outside of those areas. And if we can find a strategic fit and if things work out, we're not afraid to do it. We'll just keep looking.

Mr. Anderson, we have no further questions at this time. I would now like to turn the floor back over to you for closing comments.

All right. Thank you, Christine. Again, we appreciate everybody's participation on this fourth quarter conference call. Thank you for your interest in Astec. As our news release indicates, today's conference call has been recorded. A replay of the conference call will be available through March 11, 2014, and an archived webcast will be available for 90 days. A transcript will be available under the Investor Relations section of the Astec Industries website within the next 7 days. All of that information is contained in the news release that was sent out earlier today. This will conclude our call. Thanks to all of you, and have a good week.

Ladies and gentlemen, this does conclude today's teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation, and have a wonderful day.