Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Altisource Portfolio Solutions Second Quarter Earnings Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions]. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session and instructions will follow at that time. As a reminder, today's conference is being recorded. I'd now like to introduce your host for today's conference, Mr. Indroneel Chatterjee, Chief Financial Officer for Altisource. Sir, please go ahead.

Thank you, operator. We first want to remind you that the earnings release, Form 10-Q and quarterly slides are available at our Web site at www.altisource.com. These provide additional information investors may find useful. Our remarks may include forward-looking statements, which involve a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ. Please review the forward-looking statements sections in the company’s earnings release, quarterly slides and Form 10-Q as well as the risk factors contained in our 2017 Form 10-K and Form 10-Q, which describe factors that may lead to different results. We undertake no obligation to update these statements as a result of new information or future events. During this call, we will present both GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures. In our earnings release and quarterly slides, you will find additional disclosures regarding the non-GAAP measures. The reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP measures is included in the appendix of the quarterly slides. Joining me for today’s call is Bill Shepro, our CEO. I would now like to turn the call over to Bill. Bill?

Thanks, Indro. Good morning and thank you for joining today’s call. I’m pleased with our second quarter financial performance, generating $0.60 of adjusted diluted earnings per share for the quarter and $1.07 for the first half of the year. This represents 53% of the midpoint of our adjusted diluted earnings per share financial scenarios. More importantly, we are making excellent progress on the sales front. In a very competitive process, our Servicer Solutions business won and signed the master services agreement to be one of a select few foreclosure and REO auction provider to one of the largest institutional real estate and mortgage investors in the country. We also recently signed an agreement to provide field services to a top-4 bank. These wins represent very meaningful earnings opportunities and have the potential for significant upside in an economic downturn. We anticipate receiving referrals from both of these customers in the fourth quarter, and that our market share will grow with strong performance. These wins highlight our focus on operational excellence, which combined with industry consolidation to high-performing vendors, has allowed us to expand our client base and grow market share. Our success bolsters our long-term enthusiasm for revenue and earnings growth, even though it is taking considerably longer than we anticipated to onboard and ramp up revenue from our wins. Turning to our second quarter results in slides 5 and 6. Altisource generated $208.9 million of service revenue, $0.60 of adjusted diluted earnings per share and $27.8 million of adjusted operating cash flow. Service revenue in the second quarter in the first half of 2018 were lower than the comparable periods of 2017, primarily from the normal run-off of Ocwen servicing portfolio and Front Yard Residential, which I’ll refer to as RESI smaller portfolio of non-performing loans and REO. Second…

[Operator Instructions]. Our first question comes from line of Lee Cooperman with Omega Advisors. Your line is now open.

Thank you very much. I have a bunch of questions, Bill, but I don’t want to monopolize the call, so maybe I’ll ask a few and then come back in the queue. The industry is obviously undergoing consolidation. Look at Ocwen, PHH. Are there any interesting M&A opportunities with small player struggling that you see and is this part about game plan?

So, Lee, let me start there and then you can ask your additional questions. So I think you’re right. Differently on the Servicer side, we are seeing some industry consolidation certainly with Ocwen and PHH and we’ll probably expect to see more consolidation as the year progresses into next year. In terms of Altisource, we’re very focused primarily on organic growth. There’s occasionally some bolt-on acquisitions where we believe we have a strong competitive advantage and it may make sense to do smaller deals where it adds very marquee customers that we may not be doing work for and where we think we have a very strong and distinct competitive advantage and lastly where we can pay a price that we believe is attractive. So generally speaking, it’s organic growth.

Would you rule out if the industry is consolidating? If somebody wanted to acquire Altisource, I guess you would give the standard answer that you do whatever is right for the shareholders?

Yes, we – certainly we’re going to look out for what’s in the best interest of our shareholders. And I can’t comment here, but we would certainly look to evaluate that.

And I guess from the pattern of repurchase, you still continue to believe despite everything being delayed that the ultimate price is there because you continue to buy back stock if your view is that the stock is mispricing the prospects of the assets of the company?

We agree with you, yes.

Okay. You’ve spent – well, I’m massing [ph] my observation of your actions. We spent last year I think 60 million on investments and the plan is to spend about 40 million this year. That’s about $5.5 a share of investments. How should I measure these investments and are these business lines you are spending money on profitable? And if not, when are they going to be profitable?

Yes. So, Lee, I think you’re right. You’re putting – you’re totaling the investments over two years, is that correct?

I think last year you spent 60 million. This year 40 million, so that’s $5.5 a share.

Right. Got it. I understand what you’re doing now. So I think the key, Lee, is we’re focusing on investments that we believe can drive substantial growth at Altisource and add real value. So we wouldn’t be spending that money if we didn’t think ultimately not only are we not going to be spending, we’ll get to a more normalized R&D, but it will actually generate a lot in earnings. And what we’re doing now is making sure we’re very focused on those opportunities that we think are the largest – present the larger – sorry, we’re focusing on the larger opportunities for Altisource and evaluating some of the opportunities that maybe are smaller and not performing to what we expected. But generally speaking, we’re pleased with some of the larger investments we’re making and we’re seeing really, really good progress, and that leading indicators are also very strong.

Last question, and then I’ll come back in the queue. Why are you running the company with excess cash? I think you said you need about 60 million to run the business. At the end of the first quarter, you had 127 million of cash and securities. You’ve guided to I think 80 million to 90 million of operating cash flow at the end of the first quarter. What’s the reason for having all this cash? Why not buy back shares more aggressively or pay down debt more than your amortization calls for? And then you also said that in the last quarter – the second part of that is you also said last quarter you were holding back on home purchases due to rising rates, home prices are still rising and more investments are looking for single-family homes. You plan to buy more homes at high prices? If not, what is the cash and mark for?

Yes. So Lee, on the second part of your question, the answer is yes, we are buying more homes, but we have tightened our underwriting. So we won’t buy as many homes as we originally planned for the year because our underwriting criteria has tightened, as interest rates have raised and people’s expectations for sales prices haven’t come down at the rate you would expect them to in a rising interest rate environment. And I think that’s a function of supply. So we are going to continue to buy homes. We are very focused on continuing to improve our profitability in our BRS business. The other part of your question was around cash. So we recently, on July or early -- sorry, when did we close the loan?

April 3.

Sorry, in early April, we closed the loan. That loan has contractual amortization, Lee, of --

10%.

Yes, 10% for the first two years. I think it’s a little bit around $40 million a year. So certainly, we have to be thinking about that from a debt perspective. And of course, we can always pay that sooner if we so choose and it would be applied against the contractual amortization. But we do have that obligation. We are going to continue to grow the buy-renovate-sell business as well. And depending on where the share price is trading, we also look to buy shares back.

Thank you. I’ll re-prompt later to give other people a chance. Thank you very much.

Thanks, Lee.

The next question comes from the line of Mike Grondahl with Northland Securities. Your line is now open.

Thanks. Bill, the first question, can you quantify sort of the two new contract wins that you spoke about in Servicer Solutions, like what you think what kind of run rate they could be up to once they board?

Yes, that’s a very good question, Mike, and I want to be somewhat careful here because the potential to do foreclosure auctions and REO sales for that customer I highlighted at the beginning of my prepared remarks, a lot depends ultimately – we’re going to have to prove ourselves through performance, but they are one of the largest holders or investors in loans and real estate in the country. So that has a very, very large potential. But we got to prove ourselves. And when I say large potential, I mean the numbers could be quite frankly very large if not breathtaking if we perform. So it’s really hard though sitting in my seat today when we haven’t gotten our first referral though to actually tell you what it’s going to look like. But if we perform well and if we continue to be a top innovator in the auction space, I think we’ve got really good potential to grow with that customer. The other customer is on the field services side and it’s a top-4 bank. And they’ll start by giving us a couple of states. And if we perform well, you’re looking at one of the largest servicers in the country here. If we perform well, we have the opportunity to grow through performance. But I suspect their spending – that firm is probably spending, and this is a complete educated guess on my part, but let’s say, $25 million, $30 million a month on vendors in that space. So it has the potential and we will be one of several vendors, but it also has the potential to be meaningful. So these are really, really important wins. And I try to look in preparing for today’s call. If I look, Mike, at Hubzu, for example, and I…

Got it. Kind of segueing the non-Ocwen revenue forecast, your guidance came down a lot. Is timing the number one reason? Is there anything else to call out there just so we can better understand that?

Yes, Mike, there’s two reasons for the change and we previewed one on last quarter’s call, which is the tightening of our underwriting standards. We had started tightening and we weren’t sure necessarily how big the impact’s going to be. We’ve not readjusted our expectations for that business. And so that’s the first piece. And the second is, frankly, it’s all timing. We’re working – our clients are committed to launching these programs with us. As I said in my prepared remarks, we have to work to their timetables and it’s taking much longer than we expected to board. Look, Mike, we’re working with IT departments, compliance departments, purchasing departments. The amount of work and what it takes today to onboard a client is much, much harder than what it had been historically, and we just – we got it wrong from a timing perspective. That’s the bad news. The good news is the opportunities are absolutely fantastic for the firm. And our teams are doing a great job from a sales perspective and from a client management perspective, winning this business and getting our clients comfortable and working closely with us to onboard.

Got it. If I look at some of – I guess what I’ll call cost of goods sold and SG&A, those seemed to be coming down a lot. Is that sustainable? Can you just kind of talk about some of the cost saves, some of those categories because as your revenue softens, your cost of – you clearly kept pace if not more?

Yes, I think, Mike – I think if you look at the overall margins for the business, we’ve done a very good job in a declining revenue environment, keeping the margins relatively the same. I will tell you like – and look, the forecast for some of that new business is going to come in later than we originally expected. So we’re very focused and are very focused as a leadership team at Altisource on making sure we align our costs with that current revenue forecast. And so we are working feverishly to make sure we believe we can be successful at doing that. And that’s important to also manage the cost side. And so – and as I mentioned in my prepared remarks also – it’s also important to focus on the larger opportunities where we see very strong potential and some of the other opportunities, which don’t have as much potential as we expected. We should look, are we a buyer or a seller? And we’re taking a close look at some of those.

Got it. So I think you’re kind of saying those can continue. Is that the takeaway?

Yes, we think we can continue to do a decent – a very good job managing those costs.

Got it. And then any status on the NRZ agreement?

So yes, I just – I listened by the way to NRZ’s earnings call. So we’ve extended and I think Mike said the same thing on his earnings call earlier this morning. We’ve extended the services agreement to the end of August. And Mike Nierenberg on his call basically said he hopes to get it done this quarter. So I think – I don’t have much more to add beyond that.

Got it. Okay. I’ll jump back in the queue. I think I got one or two more but I’ll jump back in. Thank you.

Thanks, Mike.

The next question comes from the line of Shachar Minkove with Napier Park. Your line is now open.

Hi, guys. Thanks for taking my question. Most of my questions have actually been dealt with but just wanted to come in a little bit on the debt again – or I guess the cash. As Mr. Cooperman pointed out you guys have significant excess cash. I think he said $60 million, which you’ve said in the past. And I think you talked about what options you have including prepaying the term loan amortization. At 6% to 7% cash drag, it seems like kind of a no-brainer to be prepaying that. Why is that not happening already? Can you just sort of give us a thought process there?

Look, Shachar, we continue to look at what’s the right approach. We clearly agreed to very meaningful contractual amortization because we believe we generate very attractive cash flow. And I think it is prudent to delever. And so we will continue to evaluate whether it makes sense to do it sooner or not.

Okay. And would you have other alternatives?

Yes, exactly – yes, based on how we look at our other alternative uses for the cash, including developing the buy-renovate-sell program.

But that is – as you said I think it’s ramping but not moving as fast as you thought it might?

It’s not basically going to achieve the levels we originally assumed when we put out our revenue scenarios. But it is still growing quite nicely even with a tighter underwriting standards.

Okay. And then the other question I had was around Owners.com. Can you talk about – how close to profitability is that unless you – and kind of when do you think that gets to profitability?

Yes. So it’s – from my perspective, we have very strong conviction with respect to the long-term prospects of owners. If you take a look at sort of our performance year-over-year as well as sequentially, it’s doing really well. And I think – I may have a note somewhere here. If you even look just this quarter, this month, we have something like 140 homes we’ve put under contract as of a couple of days ago compared to 60 homes that we’ve put under contract in the full month of July last year. So we’re seeing really strong improvements in our time base as well as what we consider sort of cohort base based on the leads we’re receiving, how we’re doing converting those leads. And the prospects – so the sequential growth is very good and the leading indicators around the improvement in our conversion rates is really, really good. So we’re looking sometime toward the middle of next year based on our current planning to have positive marketing contribution. And as you develop positive marketing contribution in these types of business, at that point, you want to continue to scale it. So we’re seeing very attractive growth. We see a very good path toward getting to a positive marketing contribution and the businesses are performing really well. And in the meantime, we do hope to bring the losses down some next year, but this is going to be a business we will continue to invest in. The leading indicators are good. The sequential growth is good and the performance is very good, so we’re excited about it.

Okay. And how much investment do you think you need to be making into that over the next 12 to 24 months?

So we’re not going to give guidance today on how we think that business unit is performing. But we do believe we can bring the losses down in that business some next year. But also at the same time, if you have positive marketing contribution and we have very, very significant competitive advantages in that business, given the investments we’ve made in all these different services, we should continue – we believe it makes sense to continue investing in it. And as you go into new markets, and as you launch, there’s a cost to getting into those new markets just like CoStar, for example, when they were blanketing markets to grab the data on all the office buildings in the market. There is a cost to entering into a market but then that investment pays back over time as you gather all that information and then sign up your subscription to make money on it. So the same thing applies in owners. As we get the positive marketing contribution in our markets and scale, those individual markets will become more and more profitable. And then we’ll be entering into new markets and you basically repeat. And so there is a cost to repeating that. But long term, it can be very attractive. In the long term, we still believe you’re looking at 15% to 20% margins even after paying the realtor who works – the realtor who’s an agent for our business.

All right. Thank you.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from Ramin Kamali with Credit Suisse. Your line is now open.

Hi. Good afternoon. Thanks for taking my call. I guess congrats Bill on some of the recent wins in field services and I guess pretty impressive margins you’ve put forth in that segment. Just related to the prior questions, it seems like still negative contributions in the real estate and the others. So is there anything you can provide in the form of kind of metrics that demonstrates kind of good year-over-year or sequential performance in both the real estate market segment and other? And I guess on the steady-state basis, I guess – I don’t know when you expect to reach steady-state margins, but what should we expect kind of steady-state margins to look like both on a gross basis and on an EBIT margin basis in both of those segments? And I have some follow-ups as well.

Okay. So look, I think in Real Estate Investor Solutions, we’re transitioning that business from doing a lot of the work around selling the homes that RESI didn’t want to converting into this buy-renovate-sell program. So we’re making money on a unit basis on the homes, but we’re not covering our internal cost yet with those profits. So we’re working on continuing to improve the profitability of those homes and the scale of that business. And continue to focus on the cost side of the equation. So we feel good about that. In terms of owners, I think we covered that already. And then in corporate, it’s basically our financial services business, NCI, and that business actually is having decent revenue growth and some modest earnings growth as well.

So what’s the current balance sheet value in the BRS business and how --

I think we have about $35 million. It’s about $35 million, roughly.

And where can that reach at peak investment?

I’m not sure, Ramin, we’re prepared to talk about that today. But I would say, we’re continuing to buy homes. We’re also continuing to sell homes. We do expect it to grow. But longer term, Ramin, as I mentioned on the last call, we look for this to be more of a capital light business. And so we’re working pretty hard to develop a program. So over time, we can convert this to a capital light opportunity.

So one more question, if I may, and then I’ll get back in queue. I guess you’ve held onto the RESI stock for quite some now and the management team there has made several comments about internalizing some property management. So any comments on that or I guess what’s the plan there with that investment?

Yes, so I think as I’ve said in the past, we’re not a long-term holder of RESI shares. I’ve listened to George’s calls as well, and he clearly has talked about internalizing property management. I think more to come there. We’re having – but we’re starting to have a dialogue with George and we’ll see. Clearly, we have to – it would have to be something that works for both parties and we’re having a very good dialogue with George around that. So more to come.

All right. And I guess I would reiterate some of the prior comments. Your comments in the past about $60 million of minimum liquidity [indiscernible] revolver in place. So given where the stock is now, we think you should continue to use cash to delever the company.

Yes. And clearly – yes, thanks, Ramin. We appreciate your support.

Our next question comes from the line of Lee Cooperman with Omega Advisors. Your line is now open.

Thanks. For the last couple of years, you’ve been looking for some inflection point. So let me just ask you a qualitative question. From a scale of 1 to 10, 10 being high, 1 being low, how confident are you that 2019 is the inflection point for the company?

Lee, I won’t put a number on it, but I would tell you we just had a managed leadership meeting last week and the focus of the meeting was working very hard so that we can deliver what we hoped to, which is around the same or better earnings, adjusted earnings per share next year. The leadership team got together for two days. We’re committed to it. Obviously, there is a lot of wood to chop for us to get there, but we are working very hard to do it, Lee, and I wouldn’t be telling you we think we can do it if we weren’t going to try really hard to get there and didn’t have a reasonable level of confidence we’ll get there.

Looking at some private market transactions in some of the public companies, some of the businesses you’re in for whatever reason, they sell at extremely high multiples. Have you guys entertained the idea of discouraging some businesses that are not being properly valued within Altisource?

Yes, so I don’t want to talk about those types of individual transactions at Altisource. But clearly, there’s been trades, mcsauction.com, that were sold at very attractive multiples. And again, to your earlier point, we look to create the shareholder value here and we’ll continue to analyze what the best options are for the firm and our shareholders.

Thank you. No more questions.

Thanks, Lee.

Our next question comes from the line of Mike Grondahl with Northern Securities. Your line is now open.

Hi, Bill, again. With the non-Ocwen revenues falling but sort of EBITDA and EPS kind of staying the same, what do we think of as the offset?

Yes, Mike, that get back to focusing on the larger opportunities and really making sure we’re being tight on the cost side. It’s that simple.

Got it. And then any sense of revenue from NRZ outside of the Hubzu business?

So if you remember when we first signed the Cooperative Brokerage Agreement with NRZ, we also were going to get the REO referrals off of that – the PLS portfolio NRZ was acquiring from PHH. My understanding is that transaction hasn’t closed yet, so we haven’t received any revenue. But that would probably be an opportunity that will come at some point. And we – look, we continue to have a good dialogue with NRZ but there’s nothing else that we’re working over them at this point.

Got it. Okay. Thank you.

Thanks, Mike.

I’m not showing any further questions in queue at this time. I’d like to turn the call back to Mr. Chatterjee --

Thanks for joining the call. It’s Bill. Thanks for joining the call and we’ll speak to you next quarter. Thanks again.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your participation in today’s conference. This concludes the program and you may now disconnect. Everyone, have a great day.