Thanks Mike. I’m now on Slide 5 to discuss on our nylon product line which includes our Caprolactam resin and films products and represented over 45% of our sales in the quarter. You may notice that we have added an additional lines to the pricing chart on the right side of the page to address to feedback and questions we received on Asia pricing versus global and regional pricing. We have continue to detect the Asia, Benzene in Caprolactam spreads and Caprolactam to resin spread based on third-party data sourced from Tecnon OrbiChem. The Caprolactam price highlights reflects the Asia import contracts in Taiwan and South Korea. In addition, we have now added what we are referring to as a global composite index which encompasses Benzene Caprolactam spreads across four regions, the U.S., Europe, China and rest of Asia with source of data from PCI Wood Mackenzie and Tecnon and it provide a weighted average view based on each regions percentage of global Caprolactam demand. Asia remains a net important region in the world so we will continue to reference trends there as its performance is the key macro indicator for the industry while also touching on regional supply and demand dynamics. We have seen generally balanced supply conditions across North America and Europe, while China’s structural imbalances continue to create uncertainty. Overall, global Caprolactam supply and demand dynamics are normalizing from the high seen in the first half. In China availability of key feedstock material which were short earlier in the first half have largely resolved themselves and we are continuing to monitor government imposed environment constraints as we move through the summer months. We are also tracking potential capacity additions in the region, however the timing remains uncertain and our balance against continued low utilization rate. Europe supply and demand moderated as the second quarter progressed, remains favorable overall while our North America where we primarily sell industry supply and demand has remained more balanced given the capacity rationalization saw near the end of 2016. Given these regional considerations the industry pricing environment in the second quarter remain favorable on the back of higher Benzene prices and a more favorable supply and demand dynamics on a year-over-year basis. Despite some moderations sequentially from 1Q to 2Q. The global composite Benzene Caprolactam spread we compiled increased 30% in the second quarter on a year-over-year basis, but declined are more modest 9% sequentially. During the same period the Asia Caprolactam import price spread also increased by roughly 30%, but saw a sharper sequential decline of 27%. Lastly the Asia bases Resin spread of Caprolactam was up 17% year-over-year declined 7% sequentially from the first quarter. As we look toward the second half of 2017, we expect industry spreads to moderate in the high-teens in the first half and we will continue to monitor the market fundamentals and made a dynamic supply environment. Let's turn to Slide 6. Moving to Ammonium Sulfate which represented over 20% of our total sales in the quarter, we saw a seasonal sequential firming in Ammonium Sulfate pricing, but remain cautious on nitrogen market fundamentals overall. The graph on the right hand side post urea and Ammonium Sulfate retail pricing on a nutrient basis. It's important to normalize pricing as urea contains 46% nitrogen where as Ammonium Sulfate contains 21%. As a reminder our Ammonium Sulfate product disposition was a added value proposition of sulfur nutrition on increasing yields of key crop. Based on data from Blue Johnson we saw Corn belt Granular Ammonium Sulfate prices in the industry remain relatively flat on both a year-over-year and sequential basis in the second quarter. As for Corn Belt Urea industry prices declined double digit, down 15% year-over-year and more than 20% decline sequentially from the first quarter. This followed a 10% sequential improvement we saw from the fourth quarter of 2016 to the first quarter of 2017. Nitrogen Fertilizer supply and demand remains pressured with significant capacity additions coming online this year for urea, particularly in the U.S. having an underlying influence in all other nitrogen nutrition products. These capacity expansion are reducing the amount of imports required in the U.S. and are influencing historical trade close in current market pricing. In the second quarter weather contributed to the slow start of the planting season in many of our key crop growing region. As a result, we saw demand push back, but have now seen that late planting season demand tail off entering the third quarter. In addition we continue to see cautious buying behavior through the value chain ahead of the new season sale as U.S. farmer income and crop features remains challenged. As we look forward to the remainder of 2017, it remains a tougher environment overall. We have experienced many cycles over the year and although we can't predict this one, we will continue to run our business efficiently and deliver the value that our customers have come to expect from us. Let's turn Slide 7 for an update on Chemical Intermediates. Our Chemical Intermediates business which represented over 30% of our total sales, again provides revenue diversifications from the variety of co-products we sell. Acetone is the largest of those co-products or about half of our intermediate sales and has made through our phenol process. On the chart on the right side of the page, we have shown prices for refinery grade Propylene and Acetone based on third-party data sourced from IHS Markit. Acetone prices will move with its own supply and demand dynamic, they can also be influenced by the underlying moves in propylene prices. Improved prices of propylene continue to increase in the second quarter on a year-over-year basis up over 40%, a significant increase from the first quarter. In addition acetone supply in the market remain tight in the quarter given the spring phenol turnarounds at competitors and our own turnaround at Frankford which as I mentioned earlier was completed as planned. We continue to expect Acetone supply and demand to come more into balance in the second half of 2017. With our vertical integration we continue to fully utilizing etching and operation of our broader supply chain where we have seen demand remain relatively robust. As a reminder, our intermediate products are used as key inputs for a variety of end products including construction materials, paints and coatings and other industrial and consumer applications. Let's move to Slide 8. As you can see from the chart and as we get the sense of the underlying improvement. Our planned production rates on an annualized basis has continues to increase through the first half of 2017 compared to the first half of 2016 as well as the average we have seen over the prior four years. First half production volume increased 7% over the prior year period and 9% over our historical average. As we have discussed our manufacturing assets are highly integrated to ensuring safe and stable production and cost to operations is critical. Our operational excellence and Mechanical Integrity Programs have been in place for several years now to support those safe, sustainable and improved operations and we remain focused on driving this improved up time and output. Our critical equipment initiatives and maintenance capital investments helped drive more stable production and in turn allow for optimal utilization of our plants. Less variation on daily production rate enables upside and drives higher return. Our culture of continues improvement plays an inevitable role and add success as well. just last month for the first time since the spin-off, we put 20 green belt candidates through a full week of training towards their Six Sigma certification. Importantly all of our sites were represented and group included employees across many different functions including operation, supply chain engineering, health, safety and environmental, IT and finance. Each of these candidates are actively working on projects align with the strategic objectives of the organizations and we look forward to continuing to broaden this group in the years to come. We have also implemented dedicated team assigned to continue to improving effectiveness of our plant turnaround efforts. Our resources are focused on reducing risk across the supply chains, reducing the complexity of plant turnaround and minimizing overall impacts of turnaround from the start of the planning process through the restart of the assets which often times is the most critical part. We are also maturing our reliability control plans that are in place to monitor critical assets. The second quarter turnaround were a great example of this continuous improvement in actions, all are completed safely, on-time and on-budget. Our fall turnaround at Hopewell is scheduled for the fourth quarter. we expect approximately $20 million impact to pre-tax income in 4Q consistent with the expectations we discussed earlier for the full-year impact of approximately $35 million. For most of the areas we are working on during this upcoming turnarounds, there are multiple trends in the process. Therefore, we will still be running the plant though at a reduced product range. The impact we will see in our financials will come in from a fixed cost absorption, additional raw material cost and other maintenance expenses. So overall, we expect the full-year 2017 impacts of our plant turnarounds across all of the manufacturing sites in total to be in-line about historical levels. Let me turn the call back to Mike to wrap up before we open the meeting here for Q&A.