Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Q1 2013 Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. Alliance Holdings GP Earnings Conference Call. My name is Clinton, and I'll be your operator for today. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this call is being recorded for replay purposes. And I will turn the call over to Mr. Brian Cantrell, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Please proceed, sir.

Thank you, Clinton, and welcome, everyone. Earlier this morning we released 2013 first quarter earnings for both Alliance Resource Partners or ARLP, and Alliance Holdings GP or AHGP and we'll now discuss those results, as well as our outlook for 2013. Following our prepared remarks, we'll open the call to your questions. Before beginning, let's start with a few customary reminders. First, since AHGP's only assets are its ownership interest in ARLP, our comments today are directed to ARLP's results outlook unless otherwise noted. In addition, please be aware that some of our remarks may include forward-looking statements that are subject to a variety of risks, uncertainties, and assumptions, which are contained in our filings from time-to-time with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are also reflected in today's press releases from the partnerships. While these forward-looking statements are based on information currently available to the partnership and those of their general partners and management, if one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or if underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results for the partnerships may vary materially from those we projected or expected. In providing these remarks, neither ARLP nor AHGP has any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Finally, we will also be discussing certain non-GAAP financial measures. Definitions and reconciliations of the differences between these non-GAAP financial measures and the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures are contained at the end of the ARLP press release, which has been posted on ARLP's website and furnished to the SEC on Form 8-K. Now that we're through the required preliminaries, I'll turn the call over to Joe Craft, our President and Chief Executive Officer. Joe?

Thank you, Brian. Good morning, everyone. I'm pleased to report another strong showing for our partnerships as ARLP again posted record operating and financial results for the first quarter of 2013. Solid performance by our operations resulted in record coal production and higher coal sales volumes compared to the 2012 quarter. We also continued to benefit from ARLP's strong contract book as average coal sales price per ton increased slightly compared to the 2012 quarter. Increased volumes and coal prices led to higher revenues and net income in the 2013 quarter, as well as record EBITDA of $173.1 million, a 31.7% increase compared to the 2012 quarter. Segment-adjusted EBITDA expenses per ton were 2.2% lower than the 2012 quarter, as well as the sequential quarter, even though our ramp up of Tunnel Ridge production is progressing slower than we expected. Tunnel Ridge production was impacted by split coal zone, which extended further into the reserve than was anticipated. This geologic condition has caused both lower run up mine production, as well as lower plant yields for the quarter. We have changed our mine plan to minimize the longwall mining in this zone for the remainder of the year. We expect higher salable tons from Tunnel Ridge over the next 2 quarters. However, the full extent of the mine plan change will not occur until October this year. We have factored in 4.9 million tons of Tunnel Ridge production for 2013 in our guidance for coal sales, which we now believe will come in around 39 million tons in total for the year. Assuming higher production at Tunnel Ridge and consistent productivity at all of our other coal mines, we are optimistic that our operating costs for the rest of 2013 will continue to compare favorably to prior-year results. ARLP entered…

Thank you, Joe. As Joe just mentioned, ARLP started the year with another quarter of strong financial and operating results. Our performance during the 2013 quarter was led by record total production of 9.8 million tons, which increased 15.4% compared to the 2012 quarter and 7.9% sequentially. Increased production at Tunnel Ridge, Onton, Gibson North, Pattiki, Warrior and River View contributed to drive total coal sales volumes higher to 9.7 million tons, and increased revenues by 23.6% to $548.1 million. Benefiting from the ramp-up of longwall production at Tunnel Ridge, reduced outside coal purchase and cost control efforts at all of ARLP's operations, per ton expenses declined in the 2013 quarter compared to both the 2012 and sequential quarters. Higher revenues and lower expenses per ton in the 2013 quarter contributed to a 31.7% increase in ARLP's EBITDA, which climbed to a record $173.1 million, while net income also was 24.1% to $102.9 million both as compared to the 2012 quarter. Turning next to ARLP's segment results, higher coal sales led to increased revenues in each of our operating regions during the 2013 quarter. Total segment-adjusted EBITDA expense per ton in the 2013 quarter decreased by 2.2% compared to the 2012 quarter as the previously mentioned production increases at our Illinois Basin mines reduced per ton cost in the region and longwall production at Tunnel Ridge lower-cost per ton in Northern Appalachia. ARLP is maintaining its previous 2013 guidance for coal production and sales volumes of 38.1 to 39.1 million tons; revenues, excluding transportation revenues of $2.1 billion to $2.2 billion; EBITDA of $600 million to $650 million; and net income of $300 million to $350 million. Reflecting our strong start to the year and based on our expectations for the balance of 2013, we are now anticipating full year results for 2013 to be near the higher end of these ranges. We also continue to anticipate total capital expenditures during 2013 in a range of $370 million to $400 million, which includes expenditures for mine expansion and infrastructure projects, maintenance capital, continued development of the Gibson South mine and reserve acquisitions and construction of surface facilities related to the White Oak mine development project. In addition, we continue to expect to fund approximately $70 million to $90 million of our preferred equity investment commitment to White Oak. Looking at the balance sheet, liquidity at the end of 2013 -- of the 2013 quarter was approximately $555.1 million and ARLP's leverage remained low at less than 1.3x total debt to trailing 12-month EBITDA. ARLP's strong balance sheet and cash flows leave us well-positioned to execute our current plan to take advantage of any additional opportunities that may arise. This concludes our prepared comments, and now with Clinton's assistance, we'll open the call to your questions. Clinton?

[Operator Instructions] First question comes from the line of John Bridges, JPMorgan. John D. Bridges - JP Morgan Chase & Co, Research Division: Joe, Brian, another very solid set of numbers. You certainly seem to be in the sweet spot in the coal space at the moment. And I wonder if you could talk about the sort of value proposition for your customers compared to PRB. You seem to have the advantage in terms of BTUs and short rail distances. But with all that spare capacity out in the PRB, could they come back and take some market share away from you?

I think that we don't anticipate that. As we look at those utilities that have consumed PRB in the past, I think they will maintain that market. We are not seeing any PRB -- new PRB competition to the plants that we're serving. So I think prices are stable in the Illinois Basin and in Northern App, and we don't anticipate that we'll then have any erosion in that market with competition from PRB. John D. Bridges - JP Morgan Chase & Co, Research Division: Okay, great. Can you give us a bit of a background or idea as to what mix profile to expect from White Oak from that mine in the next year or 2?

I'm sorry, John, can you repeat that question? John D. Bridges - JP Morgan Chase & Co, Research Division: I'm just wondering the buildup at White Oak, what should we expect and what should we put into our models there for that?

Well, obviously, we have 3 different cash flow streams coming out of that. With royalties coming off of the reserves that we have acquired and releasing back to White Oak. We have a throughput stream coming as well, and then we'll receive the equity distributions off of our preferred investment. The mine should produce in the 6 million tons per year range. I don't believe we've yet broken out specifically what the cash flows will look like, John, but because we are capturing all of economics until we recapture our preferred return, I think if you look at that as a 6 million-ton a year mine and typical Illinois Basin margins associated with that type of the longwall operation, that should get you pretty close.

The next question is [indiscernible] from Raymond James.

So one of your competitors recently commented on NAPP pricing, looking better, at least the outlook looking better, as the stockpiles are dwindling. Are you guys seeing any thing different?

I'm sorry, I didn't hear the first part the question.

Natural gas pricing?

Oh, no. NAPP pricing. Northern App pricing.

I think that we've seen some favorable occurrences this quarter with higher gas prices than we anticipated. Stockpiles are moving down and demand's being good, so -- and then there's been some supply shortfalls, including our own Tunnel Ridge. So the supply/demand fundamentals for Northern App are better today than they, let's say the last quarter or in the past 6 months. We are seeing and expect higher pricing for that basin.

Okay. And then with gas prices where they are today, let's call it 20% of 14 tons uncontracted, are you seeing increased interest by utilities to lock in out-year tons? In the same token, are you guys willing to roll the dice a little bit more, and wait for pricing catch-up before you lock in the rest of '14 and more of '15?

We do believe that utilities will begin buying in the 1 to 3-year term area. Some are going 1 year, some are going as much as 3 years is what we're seeing, and we will be responsive to those RFPs when they come up. So we feel pretty comfortable with our current customer base. So when you look at our production in 2014 with the exception of Gibson South, we're not expecting increased production in Illinois Basin. So we expect to really be able to maintain our market share at prices should become stronger as the year goes on.

The next question comes from the line of Mark Levin of BB&T Capital Markets. Mark A. Levin - BB&T Capital Markets, Research Division: Just a quick modeling question, trying to think about Central App going forward. I realize it's a relatively de minimis part of what goes on there. But just the volatility on cost may be quarter over the quarter. How to think about that going forward? And then are you selling any met, and if so, how much and what does that market look like to you?

The volatility of cost the reason that we had $80 a quarter was tied back to the problems we had at our Van Lear mine at Pontiki where we had the mine shut down for regulatory reasons. The third and fourth quarter, it sort of straddled the third and fourth quarters, it impacted cost. Last year, I think the cost that you see in the first quarter of this year should be a predictable number for the balance of the year as we look at our mine plans there and productivity and what our expectations are. As far as the markets, we do not anticipate any met coal sales in 2013. Our met coal sales would be out of our Mettiki operation, which is included in our Northern App. So we don't have any met coal in central App. So all the coal sold in central App is to the steam market or the industrial market. Mark A. Levin - BB&T Capital Markets, Research Division: And remind me the realization obviously is in the low 80s relative to the market that's not quite there. Is this a function of stuff that was contracted when life was a lot better from a pricing perspective there?

Yes.

[Operator Instructions] The next question comes from the line of Paul Forward of Stifel. Paul S. Forward - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc., Research Division: Wanted to ask about Tunnel Ridge on the changes to the mine plan. It sounds like it's not going to affect things for next couple of quarters but maybe fourth quarter is light and then, as you get into 2014, and going forward, you're comfortable still with that 6 million-ton rate. I was just wondering if you could describe -- is that right that you have a couple of good quarters' impact from the mine plan change and then from that point forward, you're in an area where you're very comfortable with that 6 million-ton number. Is that right?

I think as we modified our mine plan, because of the development of the longwall panels, there is limited options for us in the short-term because we had -- the panel's already developed. So we got a longwall move in June. We'll have another one in the October timeframe. And we think by going to the next panel after the second longwall move, that's when we should start seeing more benefit. We do believe that -- and we're already seeing improved recoveries and run-of-mine production this month. So we do believe we're going to have better results out of Tunnel Ridge in the second and third quarters. But our higher productivity should begin to show at the higher run rate starting in the fourth quarter.

That's exactly right.

And we're now projecting 6 million. I'd like to believe that conservative. I think the capacity of the mine, we've given you in the 6.2 to 6.6 million-ton range. We'd like to be able to get there, but until we prove it, I think we're going to be conservative and sort of plan around the 6 million-ton base until we start seeing better results. Paul S. Forward - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc., Research Division: And just following up on that, is there something that changes in the geology or some of the drilling work that you've done to figure out that as you move away from where you are right now, what gives you the confidence of the -- that you won't see the same kind of issues with the seam as you move the longwall in October?

I think it's back to -- it's difficult when you're looking at these split zones. It's difficult to really be able to determine that by drilling. So the best way is through your development of your panels. So through the continuous mining process, so we can tell as we advance forward the longwall panels. Of what the seam conditions are. And as we trend more in one direction, we're just seeing better results. We just -- we're just unfortunate where we started the particular panel to start the coal mine. I think we are -- we don't know for sure until we get there, but we do feel pretty confident that through the continuous mining development that the coal conditions will improve, we'll run away from the split coal zone. Paul S. Forward - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc., Research Division: Okay. That's good. And you talked about your own inventories being -- having come down quite a bit during the quarter. I was wondering if you could talk a little bit about, I guess, specifically Illinois Basin customer inventory levels today and the prospects of working back toward a normal level and what that might mean as you are contracting for the next couple of years on your open tons.

Yes, it looks like, at this point in time, Illinois Basin is still running above its historical ranges. But we're anticipating that with the increase in demand that we see coming out of that region that you'll begin to see those inventories coming back down to more normal levels. And frankly, given that increase in demand, it's not unusual that you would expect to see inventories increasing as the utilities are building up in anticipation of the increasing demand coming out IB [ph].

We see, southeast still has a larger overhang than the others in mid-continent. And then the North, Central, you see the stockpile levels pretty close to normal.

Yes, Northern App continues to tighten on its inventory. PRB is coming back under its 5-year range. Central App is, on a total level, pretty close to its historical range. But the forecast at [indiscernible] is down, so the days of inventory are still relatively high. Paul S. Forward - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc., Research Division: So with that in mind, just getting back to Mark's question earlier about Central App, you had a really nice quarter realization at $81 a ton. I was just wondering as you look forward in your contracts over the next couple of years, I mean that's an above -- well above current market realization. I was just wondering if you can give us a little bit of sense of how the Central Appalachia -- how would you anticipate that 81 changes over the next few quarters and if it's going to drop and what might that -- what might be the impact on your outlook for volumes out of Central Appalachia -- your own volumes, that is.

As you know, you are generally contracted out about a year in central App. And so as Joe mentioned earlier, I think the per ton utilizations that we saw in the first quarter will be generally consistent through the balance of the year. Once we move toward the second half of the year, the contracting will start for 2014. We'll see how that plays out.

We get some contracts that roll into '14. We also added our MC operation, accessing some very high quality coal, some very low sulfur, high BTU. So we are able to sell some of that coal in the PCI [ph] markets and industrial markets, so we are able to get higher price than what you would actually see off of the NYMEX pricing. But the same time market does need to rebound somewhat to be able to maintain this price level in '14. But when you look at overall for our company, we do expect our 2014 realizations to be higher. And that's a combination of contract reopeners where we got some below-market contracts. Still that will roll into higher pricing and then we also anticipate that we will be selling some met coal next year out of our Mettiki operations. So the combination of those things plus our increased production at Tunnel Ridge is at a higher price point and when you look at the total revenue, we're going to get the -- on an average sales price, we should be at a higher point next year than we are this year. Paul S. Forward - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc., Research Division: Okay, and just maybe 1 last question, as you look at the White Oak and Gibson South developments, any sense you can give us on the current status of customer contracting activity from those operations? And is there any exports that you can anticipate from those or is that you really just kind of focus on your utility customers domestically as you go through the contracting process?

We mentioned in the last quarter, White Oak is marketing their own production. So we do not market that production. We do know that they're actively in the market. They have secured sales for the 2013 and 2014 production that's anticipated. I can't tell you exactly what that percentage is. Specifically, to Gibson, we're continuing to talk to customers and are very active in trying to sell both our Gibson North bracket, as well as Gibson South. So some of the tonnage that's in the -- that are in the 2 million tons that we booked as well some of last year does include some increased sales at Gibson, but not a significant amount. So most of the new production, which we are targeting for, for 2015, it opened in the market. And we would expect that for Gibson South, that some of that production, maybe as much as 1/3 could go to the export markets. It's a low-sulfur product, and we think it competes well. In the export market, it will have a good cost structure and that we should be able to participate in the export market. The actual amount will be dependent on how strong the domestic market is. So we're looking to just try to maintain consistent cash flows. So we'll go to the market that gives us the best opportunity for the Gibson South project -- product. I do believe that White Oak will also be participating in the export market to some extent. How much, I can't tell you.

We currently have no more questions in the queue. So I'd now like to turn the call over to Brian Cantrell for closing remarks.

Thank you, Clinton. To everyone on the call, we appreciate your time this morning, as well as your continued support and interest in both ARLP and AHGP. Our next call is currently scheduled for late July, and we look forward to discussing our midyear results with you at that time. Thank you, all, very much.

Thank you, ladies and gentlemen, that concludes your call for today. You may now disconnect. Thank you for joining. Have a very good day.