Michael Weinstein
Analyst · Jeffrey Kaminski, JJK Consulting. Please proceed with your question
Hi everybody. Before I get into our core business and the operating results there, I'd like to mention of two things. So first is the Meadowlands which we haven't talked much about in the past three or four quarterly conference calls, but there were significant developments tapping into Meadowlands, so I think its worthwhile passing on. Sports betting at Meadowlands has changed the economics, dynamics of the partnership. In the March quarter, sports betting and increased food and beverage business and breakeven in racing or close to breakeven in racing meant that the Meadowlands partnership of Limited Liability Corporation earned about $3.5 million. So on a dilutive basis, we own somewhere around 7.5%, 8% of that. But it's cost basis accounting which means that we really don't recognize that income until it's distributed, its K1 [ph] income, passive income of whether or not that gets distributed is up to you know General Partner, Jeff Grove and the likelihood of that money being distributed I think is fairly slim in that we are building up equity in anticipation of hopefully next year and a half, two years being granted a casino license. Again that requires a lot of movement in the state legislature – legislature, as well as both by the public for approval of that. But that money is not going to come to us. But what may come to us is the equivalent of our tax payment on that. We're anticipating that the Meadowlands on an annual basis right now is running at a positive $1million rate. So there would be recognition for us at $750,000 to $800,000 per year. In this particular year 2019, there is also going to be recognition of K-1 income for the rights that tangible [ph] and the Internet people are paid to be our representatives in sports segment that we have partnerships with them. So that would be another $7.5 million to $8 million minimum. So we're going to have a tax problem on phantom income unless we're going to distribute the equivalent of the of the tax money owed. But the main point here is that the Meadowlands is dominating sports betting in New Jersey. I think we do more business than the Meadowlands right now that all of the Atlantic City put together in terms of sports betting. And since New York is not doing anything about sports betting right now, we think you know, this business is going to build, it's in its infancy. So this is turning out even without a casino to be a worthwhile industry for us. The second thing I want to mention is that in the footnotes to the 10-Q about loan commitments, some bank capital and there it was mention of an increase of $7 million, that increase has to do with a contract that we signed to purchase a restaurant in South Florida where in the contract has been signed that we're in the last few days of hopefully closing on this deal. It's been a complicated deal. It's been difficult to taper, but we think we're at the tail end of that. So that acquisition will if it's completed probably add $1.5 million to $1.06 million in its initial year of EBITDA. It's a successful restaurant. Its been in business for a good number of years, very well managed. It's very similar to our Rustic Inn and Shuckers and Alabama properties and that management is seasoned in there long time. We're buying good management, good cash flow. So we will obviously have to file when the acquisition is complete. But I wanted to mention that because it is in a footnote in the 10-Q, I didn't want people to get confused about why it's there. In terms of our regular operations. The quarter was a good quarter in terms of how we did in Washington, Florida, Alabama. Obviously you know, we closed the Durgin-Park, I think on January 12. So we eliminated the losses that flowed in the West, many quarters into our P&L. Now the disappointment even though the numbers look good, but I think we’re up 500 plus in EBITDA, at this point it was New York. We had been struggling with minimum wage legislation for three years now. We think the elasticity in pricing if there is any is so limited. We're terrified of going up anymore. So our menu prices are fairly stable, selectively there are few items on each menu that we try to get a little bit of a bump in on. We picked on everything that we can do with scheduling. We've worked around the edges. We've increased prices on private events. But New York is a tough, tough marketplace to be in right now. So the New York results were disappointing for us. We are doing well, but just not as well as we used to be doing. So the increase in March was really due to our recent acquisitions, our Las Vegas property and a big turnaround in Sequoia, in Washington D.C. We think we got everything right there. We've got a strong manager. We have new staff that’s producing very good food, strong events department. We're starting to see the flow of events. This all happened much later than I had hoped it would. But it now seems to be working. We had just walking you know, past March we had a very strong April with the same sort of pattern. New York was weak, but the rest of the country and Sequoia had really good results. So April was strong. We're now 15 days or 14 days into May. It's rained every day in New York. It's rained every day in Washington D.C. except one. So we've had plenty of rain and [indiscernible] dampens our results for May and properties where we have outdoor cafes. But we think we have everything going right, the food in our restaurant service, the maintenance it's all excellent. Our balance sheet is in support all of this. We're very excited about our acquisition if it closes. We're excited about Meadowlands. Things are good. Hopefully the year continues the way it's been going. If we get a little bit of weather, I think we'll have really, really strong results on top of the March quarter, and December quarter. Any questions placed?