Hello, and welcome to the Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. Second Quarter 2024 Earnings Conference Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speakers' remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] I will now turn the conference over to Mr. Brian Chin, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thanks and good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us for our second quarter 2024 earnings conference call. Speaking on the call today will be Chris Huskilson, Chief Executive Officer; Darren Myers, Chief Financial Officer; Jeff Norman, President of Renewables; and Sarah MacDonald, Chief Transformation Officer. To accompany today's earnings call, we have a supplemental webcast presentation available on our website, algonquinpower.com. Our financial statements and management discussion analysis are also available on the website as well as on SEDAR+ and EDGAR. We would like to remind you that our discussion during the call will include certain forward-looking information and non-GAAP measures. Actual results could differ materially from any forecast or projection contained in such forward-looking information. Certain material factors and assumptions were applied in making the forecasts and projections reflected in such forward-looking information. Please note and review the related disclaimers located on Slide 2 of our earnings call presentation at the Investor Relations section of our website at algonquinpower.com. Please also refer to our most recent MD&A filed on SEDAR+ and EDGAR and available on our website for additional important information on these items, including the material factors that could cause actual results to differ materially and the factors and assumptions applied in making such forecasts and projections. On the call this morning, Chris will provide an update surrounding the renewable sales agreement, which was press released this morning, and on the company's ongoing strategic transition to a pureplay regulated utility. Then, Darren will review key highlights pertaining to our regulated and renewables business groups and our second quarter financial results. Darren will also provide some color on the financial outlook following the expected sale of the renewables business, and then Chris will close with some final remarks. We will then open the lines for the question-and-answer period. We ask that you kindly restrict your questions to two, then requeue if you have any additional questions to allow others the opportunity to participate. With that, I'll turn it over to Chris.

Thank you, Brian and good morning, everyone. After being in the CEO role for a year, I'm more convinced than ever that our current path towards a pure play regulated utility supports our goals to create long-term value, increase our quality of earnings, and bring increased focus to improving our execution. A year ago, I set three priority goals, to sell the renewables business, optimize the value of AY, and to get the regulated business up and running. Today, I'm pleased to announce the successful sale of our renewables business at a valuation of $2.5 billion. As we set out to accomplish in our 2023 strategic review, we've achieved a deal at a compelling value for our platform business with strong assets and scale. As we set out to accomplish, sorry, excuse me, this agreement between Algonquin and LS Power for the company's non-hydro renewable energy business, consisting of $2.28 billion in cash proceeds and $220 million in an earn-out agreement relating to certain wind assets. I just want to take this moment to thank the team from across Algonquin for the tireless efforts that they put in. It was a great job team. Thank you very much. This major milestone coupled with our previously announced support agreement to sell our Atlantica shares, delivers on our plan to transform Algonquin into a pure play regulated utility, optimize our regulated business activities, strengthen our balance sheet and enhance our quality of earnings. As Darren will touch on shortly, we expect to use the proceeds upon close in late '24 or early 2025 to recapitalize our balance sheet and position ourselves for future growth. We're also making progress on our goal to get the regulated business up and running. We reorganized along commodity lines to improve operational efficiency. We recently completed the…

Thank you, Chris, and good morning, everyone. I'll start with the regulated services group. During the second quarter of 2024, we received a final order for our BELCO utility in Bermuda, authorizing a revenue increase totaling $33.6 million over two years. New rates became effective on August 1, 2024. In New York, we filed a joint proposal with the New York Department of Public Services staff resolving all contested issues, and a final order is expected sometime in the third quarter. The Regulated Services Group currently has pending 14 rate reviews totaling $131 million as of quarter-end. Turning now to a brief update on our Renewables Energy Group. Our construction trajectory for renewables remains on track. Our construction loan balance has fallen to $405 million, due to the buyout of the new market solar and Shady Oaks II projects. By year-end, we expect that loan balance to round trip back up to similar level where we started the year due to the completion of construction at Carvers Creek and Clearview. I'll now turn to our financial results. Our second quarter financial performance delivered growth in each of our key financial metrics, EBITDA, adjusted net earnings and adjusted net earnings per share, with double-digit increases compared to the same period last year. Operating profit growth for both the regulated and renewables business were largely as expected, with regulated growing 7% and renewables growing 31%. Adjusted EBITDA was $311 million, up 12% from the same period last year. Adjusted net earnings were $65.2 million, an increase of 16%. On a per share level, our second quarter adjusted net earnings per share was $0.09, a 13% increase from the second quarter of last year. Let me briefly discuss individual EPS drivers. First, weather returned to a more normalized level, contributing approximately $0.03 to…

Okay. Thank you, Darren. In summary, we've achieved several major milestones and are delivering on our plan to transform Algonquin into a pure play regulated utility. We're reducing our capital spend and dividend to position the company for greater long-term value creation. As we look forward, we expect to have a solid balance sheet, a healthy payout ratio, a capital-light path towards earnings, and ultimately dividend growth, all under for the first time, a focused company with a singular business model. It's a tremendous story and we're excited for the future. With that, we'll open the lines for calls. Operator?

[Operator Instructions]. And your first question comes from the line of Rupert Merer from National Bank. The line is open.

Hi. Good morning, everyone. Congratulations on getting to the conclusion of that deal.

Thank you.

Thank you, Rupert.

So if I can start by asking about the net cash proceeds of $1.6 billion. What does the walk down look like from the sell price? How much of that difference is related to taxes, transaction fees versus construction debt repayment?

Yeah, I mean, Rupert, it's primarily the construction loans. There's very little tax friction on the deal, consistent with our original expectations. So, the majority of it would be construction loans. And then really just the transaction costs and some of the break fees on the APCo bonds would be included in that as well.

Okay, great. And that construction debt, is that debt that's currently off balance sheet or yet to be incurred on your development pipeline?

Yes. As I mentioned, so we -- the balance is lower as of the end of Q2, but we expect it to get back to similar levels that it was, call it, around the $700 million mark, or just below that by the end of the year as we continue to build out Clearview and Carvers.

Great. And then on the, the transaction itself, can you walk us through your thoughts on the valuation? How much of this is for your development pipeline versus your operating assets? And what's your perspective on the multiple that you're getting on the deal?

Yeah, listen, we think it's an excellent multiple and a strong transaction. It's always hard to decipher what you're getting for the platform, but clearly we see this as a, with the earn out at 12.5 times type multiple of next year's EBITDA, like estimated EBITDA, and without the earn out, more like close to 11.5 times. So really strong multiples. And so clearly there was value seen in what the team's built over 30 years, and the strong development pipeline and just the strength of the organization. So we're quite pleased with where that ended up.

Yeah. And, Rupert, I think we said all along that in order for us to get to a sale of this business, we had to see value for the development pipeline. So, we haven't tried to quantify that, but it's pretty clear to us that we did get paid for that.

Very good. I'll leave it there and get back in the queue. Thanks very much.

Great.

Thanks, Rupert.

Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Sean Steuart from TD Cowen. The line is open.

Thanks. Good morning, everyone, and congrats on getting this over the line.

Thank you, Sean.

Chris, the 60% to 70% payout ratio on EPS, am I to take it that is from the starting point 2025 post this asset sale? Or is that relative to where you would expect EPS to get to as your rate cases normalize, I suppose?

Yeah. Sean, it's Darren here. Let me just jump in. The target payout has been set based on our current reg assets fully earning or earning closer to fully earning. Clearly, next year will be our first year as a pure play regulated utility. We're in a multi-year journey. And as Chris highlighted through his prepared remarks, we have the most active rate cases we've had in history, plus the implementation of a major system. So from a timing perspective, we do expect some delays in 2025 with improvements in 2026. But just for clarity, that dividend rate has been set based on the current assets, including $1 billion -- getting recovered in that $1 billion of investments we've already made that's not in rates.

Okay. And then the follow-on question there is, you've indicated constrained capital investment in the regulated base and capital-light approach putting these assets that haven't been recognized in the rate base. How long do you anticipate that capital light approach to last? And how does this feed into your expectation of mid-term EPS growth off the reset base?

Yeah. Well, certainly, it really depends on how quickly we can advance the rate cases that we need to advance and our success rate on those. But I think we're talking about a few years. I mean, that's the kind of timeframe we'd be expecting. And at the end of the day, what we're really focused on doing is raising our game when it comes to how we work through things with regulators, how we actually make decisions around regulatory investments, and how we just advance this business. There's a substantial amount of work going on to improve the accountability across the business and to improve the ability of our utility leaders to actually run those businesses. And all those things are going to be important parts of all this.

Yeah, John, we have to also -- we have to prove, just add to what Chris is saying, that we can add more capital in a disciplined way and get appropriate returns with, with very little regulatory lag. And that's -- I'm with Chris, probably a few years of restraint. But we do see growth after that. And from that kind of 2025 starting point, we see an ability really to grow earnings without growing capital. So, just by increasing the returns and getting more efficient in the business.

Understood. Okay. That's all I have for now. Thanks, guys.

Okay, thank you.

[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from the line of Nelson Ng from RBC Capital Markets. The line is open.

Thank you and congrats on the transaction. So the first question, I just want to have a quick clarification. In terms of the 11.5 times to 12.5 times next year's EBITDA, is it roughly the run rate EBITDA of the assets, assuming that they're fully constructed and commissioned? And does it exclude the development expenses that you have within that business?

Yeah. You got it, Nelson. Yeah, you got it.

Okay. Perfect. And then the next question is just more about capital allocation. Obviously, you will need to start the hydro sales process shortly, if you haven't already started. But like with the proceeds, can you just talk about capital allocation in terms of debt reduction, share buybacks and, and I guess it's utility growth sometime, whether it's next year or the year after?

Yeah. Nelson, I mean, really for us, it's around getting that strong balance sheet, right side dividend, primarily this is all going to debt, debt repayment. And of course, with that strong balance sheet, we will have some flexibility to make different choices from there. But the primary focus is really to be more self-sustaining, earn on what we have today and just be in a position of strength.

Yeah. And I'd say, Nelson, we're not ruling out buybacks, but at the end of the day, it's flexibility that we want and strengthen our balance sheet. Those are the two things that are primarily on our minds. And so at the end of the day, we'll make those decisions as time unfolds.

Okay. So, primarily debt repayment but not ruling out buybacks.

Correct.

That's right.

Okay, thank you. I'll leave it there and get back in the queue.

Okay, thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Mark Jarvi from CIBC Capital Markets. The line is open.

Hey, good morning, everyone.

Good morning, Mark.

Can you give us a bit more -- yeah, yeah, lot to unpack here. Very busy. Congrats on the deal. Can you explain the sort of change in tone around the utility spend? Originally, it was, that if the balance sheet was in a better position, you got the proceeds, you could accelerate spend. It's kind of going the opposite way here. I get the issues of regulatory lag. But just try to understand what's kind of transpired over the last few months here or quarter, that really does have you really cutting back. Is it, is it just more challenging regulatory environment, the push out in some of the rate cases, it does seem a bit of a departure from what you guys were signaling before.

Yeah. Well, so, we still see that future as has been described as our future. But at the end of the day, we also believe we need to put a substantial amount of discipline into this business. And so as we work through accountability and how we want to structure and run our utilities, at the end of the day, the main word is discipline. And so we want to be absolutely certain that we understand when we put $1 of capital in the business, how we're going to recover that $1 of capital and how we're going to, how that's going to advance our relationship with our customers, the service to our customers and ultimately, value for our shareholders. And so that's really what we're working as we speak. And as I said, one of my three goals originally was to get the business up and running the regulated business up and running as a normal regulated utility. And I've said to people all along for the past year that this utility was cobbled together. It wasn't running the way I would have expected it to run. And as we learn more about how it runs and the discipline that it needs in order to be a good solid investment for folks, that's really what we've come to. And that opportunity to do capital-light growth is one that is pretty unique and we're happy to be able to take advantage of that.

And Mark, maybe just the only thing I'd just add to that is nothing has changed from our view that we originally came out with, which is the ability to invest $1 billion a year in this business. But I would say, I don't know if it's a change in to them, because we've, I think been very consistent. We need to get more discipline in the business. And if we don't have that right discipline, we can't go spend the capital. We need to be good stewards of the capital and be good things for our customers and for our shareholders. So you're seeing us -- we're not -- we need to be better on our returns. And once we are there, we will spend more capital.

Understood. And then, Darren, coming back to the question of where does the proceeds go? It doesn't seem like it's a buyback. You did mention that the APCo bond was a break fee. If I assume those get repaid as well as obviously the construction financing. If you think about then the residual proceeds, what you expect to get from Atlantica, you may be at a point where you don't have to pay more floating rate debt or variable rate debt and you beat your credit metrics, will you sit on a cash balance for a while? Is that the expectation here as, as you work through the repositioning of the utility franchise?

Yeah. I think we'll continue to look at what's the most optimal capital structure is after. I think there's lots of options to repay debt, but have the ability to obviously flex up credit facilities up and down. So we'll, we'll give more of that. And we do plan as we've said before, we get closer to the closure of the Renewables business to provide an Investor Day update to give you lots of the questions that I know you, that you have.

Yeah. And just remember, so a fair bit of time will pass before this cash actually comes to us. So, that's another factor in this. It's going to take some time to get through the regulatory approvals and so on that, that we need for these investments, for these transactions. Including AY, we're not, we're not sure exactly when that will get approved either.

All right. And then just Darren is a follow-up of some improved disclosure assurance and use pro forma utility business after the close of the sale. I know you're trying to infer to us where the earnings is going to be with the payout ratio. But is there something where you could actually show the trajectory as you go into '25, '26, '27. Is that something where you think you could be a bit more explicit on the earnings outlook on an annual basis that's guidance on a multi-year basis or just a cadence of EPS uplift over time?

Yeah. No, absolutely. We will, like I said, at an Investor Day, we'll give you as much transparency as we can so that you understand what we're doing and what you should be holding us accountable to. We're not prepared to do that today, but we definitely will as we get closer to the closure of the deal give you more.

Yeah. And as we get into some of these regulatory processes, we'll have a better idea as to when these things might close. So, that will be the biggest, biggest factor is when do the, we actually see the proceeds.

Understood. Thanks for the time today. Appreciate it.

Yep. Thanks, Mark.

Thank you.

Thank you. There are no further questions at this time. I'll turn the call over to Mr. Chris Huskilson.

Okay. Well, with that, we'd like to thank everyone for their interest in Algonquin. And also, again, I want to thank the team from across the entire business that actually pulled this together. The folks in the renewable side and the folks across the business, this was a tremendous effort and obviously very successful. So, thank you all for that and thank you for your time today.

This concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.