Good day and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the American Public Education reports Second Quarter 2021 Results Conference Call. Thank you. I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Mr. Rick Sunderland, Chief Financial Officer. Please go ahead.

Thank you, operator and good evening everyone. Materials that accompany today’s conference call are available in the Events and Presentations section of the APEI website. Please note that statements made in this conference call and in the accompanying presentation materials regarding American Public Education, its subsidiaries or Rasmussen University that are not historical facts maybe forward-looking statements based on current expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections about American Public Education and the industry. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual future events or results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such statements. Forward-looking statements maybe able to be identified by words such as anticipate, believe, seek, could, estimate, expect, intend, may, plan, should, will, would and similar words or their opposites. Forward-looking statements include without limitation, statements regarding the impact of recent disruption to the Army’s tuition assistance programs, expected growth, registrations in enrollments, revenue, net income, earnings per share and EBITDA, expected benefits of the acquisition of Rasmussen University, the closing of the acquisition and its timing, expected financial results for Rasmussen, future impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, the ability to transform the student experience and deliver return on learner’s educational investment, the impact of organizational changes, the ability to maintain an attractive risk profile, plans with respect to recent, current and future initiatives and future demand for online and nursing education. Actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including risks related to actions taken by the Department of Defense or branches of the U.S. Armed Forces, including actions related to the disruption and suspension of tuition assistance, the effects of an APEI’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic, including impacts on the demand environment as the pandemic abates, the acquisition of Rasmussen University, changes to and expectations regarding our enrollment, registrations and the composition of our student body and the risk factors described in the Risk Factors section and elsewhere in the company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC today, in the company’s most recent annual report on Form 10-K and in the company’s other SEC filings. The company undertakes no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason unless required by law, even if new information becomes available or other events occur in the future. I will now turn the call over to our CEO, Angela Selden.

Good afternoon and thank you for joining our call to discuss American Public Education’s second quarter earnings, along with an update on our business momentum. Today I will cover four topics before turning the call over to our CFO, Rick Sunderland, who will review some key financial metrics and results. First, I will provide an update on the Rasmussen transaction. Next, I will discuss momentum at APUS, including an Army portal update, sharing context regarding the continued impact the outage has had on both our enrollments and cash collections. I will also share some actions we have taken to reaccelerate momentum along with efforts underway to shore up cash flows. Third will be an update on Hondros nursing momentum. And last, I will share plans to begin providing you with a longer term outlook, so you can better measure quarterly and annual performance in the context of our strategic goals. Turning to Page 4, I’d like to discuss the Rasmussen transaction. We remain on track to close the Rasmussen transaction in the third quarter of 2021. As we have shared previously, Rasmussen University has approximately 18,000 students with a roughly 50:50 mix of nursing and non-nursing students and 40% of non-nursing students in health sciences. When we announced the transaction in October 2020, we shared that Rasmussen’s fiscal year 2020 year end results ending September were $256 million of revenue and approximately $40 million of adjusted EBITDA. On a trailing 12-month basis and unaudited financials through June of 2021, Rasmussen generated $273 million of revenue and $46 million of adjusted EBITDA, demonstrating continued growth and margin expansion of about 120 basis points. For the 6 month period ending June 30, 2021, Rasmussen grew revenue over 9% to $137 million from $126 million and adjusted EBITDA grew to $22 million from…

Thank you, Angie. Going on to Page 8, as Angie noted, disruption to Army TA had an adverse impact on second quarter registrations at APUS. This together with other factors Angie discussed in turn adversely impacted revenue for the quarter. For the quarter, consolidated revenue decreased $4.1 million or 5% as compared to the prior year. In our APEI segment, APUS revenue decreased quarter-over-quarter by $6.7 million or approximately 9% driven by a 26% decrease in Army registrations. The revenue decline at APUS was partially offset by $2.5 million or approximately 29% quarter-over-quarter increase in revenue at Hondros driven by a 36% increase in total student enrollment. Cost and expenses for the 3 months ended June 30, 2021 were $76.0 million, an increase of $3 million or 4% compared to $73.1 million in the prior period. 80% of the increase in costs and expenses was primarily due to a $2.4 million increase in cost and expenses at Hondros due to higher student enrollment. Cost and expenses in our APEI segment increased $0.6 million as compared to the prior year period, driven by a quarter-over-quarter increase in professional fees related to the integration planning for the Rasmussen acquisition and increases in information technology costs related to our multiyear technology transformation program. For the quarter, APEI segment professional fees increased $2 million and information technology costs increased $0.6 million as compared to the prior year quarter. Instructional cost and service expenses decreased $0.3 million, or 1% to $30.4 million and as a percentage of revenue increased to 39.0% from 37.4% in the prior year period. The decrease in instructional costs and services expense dollars was primarily due to a decrease in faculty compensation and instructional material costs at APUS partially offset by increases at Hondros both due to changes in enrollment volume.…

Thanks, Rick. Let’s turn to Page 10. As we look forward to the back half of this year, our priorities continue to include: first, ensuring a high-quality execution of the integration plan for Rasmussen University, including the synergy capture, regaining both Army enrollment momentum and transforming the admissions and enrollment processes at APUS, all while staying true to our mission of HEROI, delivering a high-quality education at an affordable price to students at each of our institutions. Operator, please now open the line for questions.

Thank you, Angie. Your first question comes from the line of Tobey Sommer from Truist Securities. Sir, your line is open.

Hey, good evening everyone. This is Jasper Bibb on for Tobey. So, I just wanted to ask two clarification questions on TA. At this point, are most Army students are starting now able to receive TA benefits for their fall classes without an exception of policy? And what’s kind of been the general experience of getting students reimbursed for classes they might have taken during the assistance offline?

Hi, I will start this question and then ask for Rick to provide any additional details. So, without going into lots of specificity that what I will share with you is that the issue, the data issue that exists right now is the returning students’ ability to tap into their degree plan. The degree plan when loaded into the TA system helps the Army understand what program the student is pursuing from a higher education perspective. And also to understand which courses they have already taken. The data exchange on the degree plans isn’t working right now. So, the vast majority of our APUS students continued to be operating in an exception to policy, very few of the students that we are serving today have successfully processed their TA request to the ArmyIgniteED system.

Okay, so that’s helpful. And then some of your peers cited a bit of upwards pressure on acquisition costs. I was curious what your experience has been on that front and how your marketing was trended?

Great question, one of the key focus areas that Harry Wilkins will spend time on in conjunction with APUS leadership is really a focus on converting the leads that we are receiving, because of the value proposition of APEI Higher Ed return on educational investment, the fact that we have a very affordable opportunity for students to pursue their higher education, we don’t see pressure on the acquisition costs. What we want to do is make sure we take every lead that we receive, and convert every one of those at the highest probability of conversion. And so a big focus for us will be optimizing the marketing investments that we have been making over the course of the last six months of 2021 to ensure that we make the most of the marketing dollars we are spending.

Okay. And then just following up on the strategic initiatives that as APUS discussed earlier, can you give a bit of color on the opportunity you are seeing in corporate partnerships, and just talk about what types of corporates you might be targeting in that effort just given the unique student body, heavily military veterans and service?

Great, question. I think we see that there is a keen interest in military and veterans, students, and their backgrounds and the discipline, the experiences that they have received. And so we believe that there is a really symbiotic relationship that can be established between our student population and the corporate companies who are looking intently at finding ways to tap into active duty military students who are stepping away, and veterans. And so it’s through that lens that we will be focusing a lot of our time and attention with our new corporate partnership leader.

Thanks for taking the question. I will get back in the queue here.

Thanks so much.

Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Stephen Sheldon from William Blair. Your line is open.

Hey, thanks for taking my questions. One of the asked, first kind of what still needs to be done or what approvals are still needed to get the Rasmussen deal done and what’s your level of competence that have been completed now, relative to a few months ago?

Hi, Stephen, great question. We are really not in a position to discuss the details around the remaining closing conditions. But we have a very high degree of confidence that we will be able to close the Rasmussen transaction by the end of the third quarter.

Okay, great. And it sounds like rather than continuing to put up really impressive growth here, anything you can share there on what growth trends and maybe look like between their nursing and non-nursing programs and the potential sustainability of the growth they have been putting up here over the last year or so?

I mean, let’s turn that question over to Steve Somers.

Yes. Hi, Stephen. The general trend at Rasmussen without getting into the specifics is that the nursing business and the enrollment there has outpaced the non-nursing. And that’s really a trend that has been consistent for the last several years. And so the mix shift has moved more dramatically towards the nursing side and is roughly 50-50 now, which if you look back 3 years or 4 years ago was closer to 30% on the nursing side. That has a lot to do with where they have been focusing their marketing and marketing dollars and their resources in rolling out programs as well.

Thanks.

Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Greg Pendy from Sidoti. Your line is open.

Hi, guys, thanks for taking my questions. Just in light of the good trends you have seen at Hondros. You mentioned the NCLEX at the new campus was 100%. Can you speak to the overall NCLEX pass rate trends that you have been seeing in light of the moment recoveries that are going on there?

Hi, Greg, great to speak with you. What we are seeing so far in 2021, is a slight improvement. As you know, NCLEX scores are measured by program by campus. And so we pay very careful attention to those trends. The continuous improvement initiatives that Harry has put in place, include the team focused on the academic rigor, the sequencing of the courses, the support, the academic advising and support that we have implemented at Hondros, in order to be able to make sure that students have both the content that they need, and also the confidence to be able to prepare for and sit for the NCLEX exam. And so we believe that all of those investments are paying off in terms of what we are seeing as improvements year-over-year.

Great. And then just one more question, just trying to put together the guidance, if you – if I am not mistaken, you said July for Army registrations was down 21% and then they improved to down 4% in August. I might be incorrect in saying that. But if I am correct, how should we be thinking about revenue per student, the impact on that, on APUS assuming that we have sort of a strong rebound at the tail end of the quarter?

So Greg, revenue per student is on average lower than our non-military students, right. So, they get what’s called the freedom grant. So, they are at the undergrad level and $250 per credit hour, whereas non-military are $285. So, it’s about $35 difference. As you have seen the mix shift, shift towards more military, away from the non-military, which has been the trend over the last 1 year, 1.5 year, you probably have observed a slight decline in overall revenue per student. Of course, that would have been offset by the 5% tuition increase we did for the non-military students in January of 2020. I don-t – from my seat, I don’t think that mix shift is necessarily material in terms of overall kind of revenue trends versus registration trends. They tend to track pretty closely to do back to the first quarter, there was some daylight between those two simply because the first quarter of ‘20, the comparable period was the first quarter of the price increase and it was making its way into the system as students could register five months in advance. But if you look at APUS in the second quarter, the change in overall revenues is tracking fairly closely to that change in overall registrations.

That’s helpful. Thanks a lot.

Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Raj Sharma of B. Riley. Your line is open.

Hi. Thank you, guys. Thank you for taking my questions. So, I wanted to understand the Army portal was supposed to be back in June. But then it didn’t come back until the third week of July. But it came back on the daily exchange is not working for the students who want to get on and figure out whether they will get approval, could you please give some more color on that?

Sure, Raj. It’s Angie, I will start and then happy to have Rick weigh in with more details. Our understanding is that when they moved from their old system, GoArmyEd to the new system, IgniteED that there was a process and procedure change. In the past, the soldiers would enroll simultaneously in the TA system and in our system. And now they have created more dependency between data feeds back and forth. So, now the students need to enroll in our system, we send those requests and inquiries to the IgniteED system. And then they are supposed to push the information back to us with the approvals. The dilemma, as I mentioned a few minutes ago is that they approved TA when they see that a soldier has a degree plan. And they understand which courses that soldier has already taken. And given that the degree plan data load hasn’t been successful, our understanding is for any institution, not just ours, right, the changing the basically the layout of the data feeds. Any soldier who had a degree plan with us prior is basically enrolling in courses through the ETP when they choose to do that, with the belief and the hope that when their degree plan gets loaded into the new system, and the courses that they have taken subsequently match up to that degree plan, that that will trigger, satisfactory set of conditions that allows TA to cover those enrollments. So, as you – I am sure for you it is a challenge to anticipate what the next month is going to look like. So, stand in our shoes and imagine how we are also experiencing it, because we are also given the information, which is the best information that the Army has at any point in time about what they believe, will be a positive next step. And we take those steps together. And we are seeing forward progress. But as you can see from the commentary we have provided today, it’s not fully successful at this point. And that is measured both in terms of TA approved enrollments, but also the $17 million of students that we have served through the ETP that we haven’t been able to collect any kind of payment on so far.

So, hey, Raj, it’s Rick. Let me just add to that I agree with everything Angela said, I just want to highlight the point that the issue exists on the Army side, and not on our side as they continue to update file specifications. And I am going to give a shot out to our IT team, they probably never had that on earnings call before. They have been very agile in responding to the incremental changes that the Army provides us at file specs, making sure that we are staying as current as we can relate to the file requirements. So, it’s an Army side issue. They are working through some field specifications on their side, where we are staying close to that, updating the files on our end, and are ready to submit when we get the green light from the Army.

But so is it fair to say for all practical purposes, the portal is still not effective/working in the center, you are enrolling the Army students and then getting paid, last quarter – so that – is that why 3Q is guided, the impact is similar to what 2Q impact was because of this portal outage?

Yes. Certainly for the student – returning students, we have over 22,000 students whose degree plans have not yet been successfully loaded into the IgniteEd system. And we believe that the new student process has more promise. We are seeing a trickle of students coming through what should be the new fully operational process. But we see predominantly the same situation that we had in the last quarter to answer your question specifically. Yes.

But and so you – and you don’t know whether this extends into Q4 or not. In Q2, about 25, right, that quarter the enrollments from Military were impacted? Is that a similar number here in the third quarter?

We believe it’s roughly that same impact in Q3, yes.

Okay, thank you. And then my next question is also seems like the non-military surprised to the downside in second quarter, as well. I just wanted to kind of understand what could you do to fix that and get it to grow again? What’s going to…

Yes, it’s a small, it’s a small decline. Very modest relative to some of the other declines we are seeing. And certainly, we have taken swift action. Dr. Wade Dike has, as I mentioned, introduced Harry Wilkins into the APUS enrollment and admissions process. We feel that currently, our marketing investments are yielding high quality leads. And what we want to do over the course of the next, really the next four months, is to work every single one of those leads and ensure that we are maximizing the enrollment, momentum and impact that we can from the leads that we are generating. We have a substantial number of non-military leads that are coming into the top of the funnel, and we are turning over every stone to make the most of those leads.

Got it. Thank you. I will take it offline. Thanks.

Okay. Thank you.

Thank you, Raj.

Thank you. There are no further questions at this time. I will now turn the call back to Rick. Please go ahead.

Thank you everyone. Have a good evening. This concludes our call. Thank you.

This concludes today’s conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.