EMVR is projected to generate about $32 million on a levelized basis annually from decreased cost of natural gas and increased LCFS and 45Z revenue. That comes in at roughly $0.50 a gallon. Of additional margin, and that is in cash. So that is a significant, sustainable competitive advantage that we will have. I believe we are the first installer of MVRs in this cycle. I think ADM might have had 1 at some point or something, but I think we will be the first 1 in the country. And what is unique about our plant is that we are located on the California electricity grid which has a very diligent commitment to getting to zero carbon intensity. So as the grid decarbonizes in California using more solar, wind, and hydroelectric, that directly will improve our CI score. So tapping into that decarbonized grid is an advantage we have here in California that not all states provide. So the MVR is a uniquely, energy efficient implementation in our particular plant. We also have the impact of e 15. We have. We did not talk about e 15 on this call, but California is the first state in the country to adopt year round e 15 at the state level. As you know, California is the only state that can set its own fuel rules. And so the senate bill 95 recently passed, and it has implementation slated for January 1, 2027. That will be additional capacity requirements about equal to 10 of our plants. So somebody across the country has to either build a new plant or expand their existing plant, to meet this California capacity requirement. And then nationally, of course, the house has already approved, and the senate is pending approval v 15. We do not have any particular projections on when that would happen. But, certainly, the recent political events would support biofuels in rural areas. So we think that e 15 has some strength in it. That is our underlying margin. The last time we actually had support for the international. The national demand for ethanol. We made 40 million of positive cash flow. So in, the actual molecule, this business should be a 50¢ or more per gallon molecule. And then lastly, is the LCFS credit price, even generating the same number credits. Last year, we only got $42 per credit. Now we are at 90 The cap is 275 this year. there is a long way to run, and, the LCFS credits have continued to be not produced at the rate necessary to meet compliance, so there is a deficit. And there is over 10 million credits that disappeared out of the, excess bank over the 12 months. We expect that to continue, and there should be theoretically no excess inventory of credits within the next 24 months. So we are going to benefit from that. Our revenue goes up even the same number of gallons. So we have a number of significant drivers. Last point I wanna make is we have not talked much about corn oil. But corn oil is the most attractive lowest emission rate feedstock for renewable diesel, biodiesel, and sustainable aviation fuel. It only has a 10 emissions rate. Is 18 to 20. UCO is 20 to 25. Soybeans is 30. So the use of distillers corn oil, as renewable diesel were sustainable aviation fuel feedstock should really be a top priority for all those producers. And we are the largest producer to source corn oil in California. And through Andy's team's, implementation of 2 of 3. But by the end of this quarter, we will have 3 operating units separate in corn oil. We will be doubling our corn oil production at a time which the price is roughly doubled. So it is a very promising additional margin for the business. it is, of course, very sustainable. Great. And Eric, maybe just touching on a point that you kinda highlighted there on policy. Biofuels generally tends to be supported by both Democrat and Republican. Republicans. But again, given what we have seen with the change given the democratic sweep, I mean, are you expecting any changes or anything that might have occurred in California that was surprised And anything that you could offer us as color as to how you see policy come together at both the federal and state level would be appreciated? I would say that generally, the rural areas and farmers played an outsized role in this election. And I think, we have Democrats now as governors in Iowa and, senators from Texas that are Democrats. But that are being voted into play. In these rural states and that is always good for corn and soybeans, which is good for ethanol. Really, the only growth market for corn is ethanol. So the initiative we are looking for, I think, will be supported A second factor, and I will make this very brief, is we are gonna have a congress that really cannot get things for the White House, and the White House who really cannot get things through congress, is very, very good for the biofuels business. Stability in policy is just tremendously supportive of our financing efforts, our growth efforts. It is really a wonderful situation we find ourselves where we do not have to worry about Congress coming up with an idea and immediately implementing it. it is it is it is probably the opposite of what investors thinking, but I can tell you, as operators of this business, we are looking forward to the stability and policy which we should see and supported policy when it happen. Then, Eric, 1 last, if I could. Just on the dairy RNG business, As you look out into next year and the pipeline of the farms that you guys have to bring on, what is the what kind of pace would you expect for next year? We have financing in process right now. I think that news is something we will be reporting here over the next couple months. And we have 13 long lead time items that we have received very strong support from a vendor to get built. So our ability to deploy those 13 rapidly is certainly in place. We just need the financial closing to accelerate beyond the current pace we have right now. Terrific. Thanks for your time, Eric.