Good morning ladies and gentlemen and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the AMERISAFE fourth quarter 2007 earnings conference call. (Operator Instructions) I would now like to turn the conference over to Mr. Ken Dennard with DRG&E.

Good morning everyone. We appreciate you joining us for AMERISAFE’s conference call to review 2007 fourth quarter and year-end results. We’d also like to welcome our internet participants that are listening to the call, as it is being simulcast over the web. Before I turn the call over the management, I have the normal house keeping details to run through. You could have received an email of the earnings release yesterday afternoon, but occasionally there are technical difficulties. So if you didn’t receive your release, or you’d like to get placed on our email distribution list, please call our offices at DRG&E and that number is 713-529-6600. Also there will be a replay of today’s call that will be available via webcast by going to the company’s web site and that site is www.amerisafe.com. Or there will be a telephonic recorded replay available for seven days and details how to access that feature are in the press release. Please note that the information recorded on this call speaks only as of today, February 28, 2008 and therefore you are advised that time sensitive information may no longer be accurate at the time of any replay listing. Also, statements made in the press release or this conference call, that are not historical facts, including statements accompanied by the words such as will, believe, anticipate, expect, estimate or similar words are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 regarding AMERISAFE’s plans and performance. These statements are based upon management’s estimates, assumptions and projections as of the date of this call and are not guarantees of future performance. Actual results may differ from the results expressed or implied in these statements as a result of risks, uncertainties, including but not limited to the factors set forth in the company’s filings with Securities and Exchange Commission, including AMERISAFE’s10-K dated March 5, 2007, its future and other filings. AMERISAFE cautions you, that you do not place undue reliance upon forward-looking statements contained in the release or in this conference call. AMERISAFE does not undertake any obligation to update or publicly revise any forward-looking information or statements to reflect these events, information, or circumstances that may arise after the date of this release and call. For further information, please see the company’s filings with the SEC. Now, with me this morning are Allen Bradley, the company’s Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer; and Geoff Banta the company’s Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer. And now I’ll turn the call over to Alan.

Good morning ladies and gentlemen. Thank you for joining us for our quarterly investment conference call. I’m going to make a few general comments about 2007 before turning it over to Geoff to discuss the financials. 2007 was a record year for AMERISAFE. Our net income was up over 34% and our combined ratio improved to 85.9% from 92.4% in 2006. We produced a return on average shareholder equity of just over 24% and ended the year with a book value per share of $11.66. Our book value per share has increased 61% in the 26 months since our initial public offering. Our gross premiums written of $328 million were at the low end of our revised guidance that we provided in the third quarter. This lower premium was due to reduced loss cost, lower work activity and increased competition. I am especially pleased that we maintained our underwriting and pricing discipline in this market as is evidenced by our 2007 effective loss cost multiplier of 1.51 or 151% of the approved loss cost in the states that use that mechanism for pricing. Our effective loss cost multiplier for the fourth quarter declined slightly to 1.47. On an end force basis our voluntary Workers Compensation policy count was 6.9% higher at December 31, 2007 than at the same time in 2006. Our end force premium was up 3.6% and our insured payroll had increased 7.5%. Our average premium size declined by about 3.1% from 2006 to 2007 reflecting lower loss cost and competitive pressures. Our loss frequency for the year was well within our expectations. The great news is that at the end of the year we had only 5,214 open Workers Compensation claims as opposed to 5,727 at the end of the third quarter of 2007, a reduction of approximately 500 claims. So our total open claims as of December 31 were the lowest year-end open claims count in a decade. This number has consistently trended downward over the last year as we have been very focused on improving our claims handling processes by reviewing and aggressively closing our older claims. At this time, I’m going to turn it over to Geoff.

Good morning everyone as Allen stated we had a terrific year in 2007. And I’ll begin my remarks by focusing on the fourth quarter. In that quarter we reported record net income of $18.6 million, compare to $14 million in the fourth quarter of 2006 for an increase of 32.6%. This increase was due mainly to a $9.5 million prior year reserve take down and a decrease in policyholder dividends of $6.8 million. Off setting these positive changes was a decrease in net premiums earned in the fourth quarter of $10 million. In terms of operating ratios, our net loss ratio for the fourth quarter of 2007 was 51%, compared to 58.7% for the same period in 2006.The decrease in 2007 included 12.8 points of favorable prior year development, compared to 2.6 percentage points in the fourth quarter of 2006. The favorable prior year loss development was primarily from accident years 2004 to 2006. For the 2007 accident year, our loss ratio increased from 61.3% in the fourth quarter of 2006 to 63.8% for the fourth quarter of 2007. This increase was a function of our decreased premiums earned. Our net underwriting expense ratio for the fourth quarter of 2007 increased to 23.8% from 22% in the fourth quarter of 2006, although actual fourth quarter expenses were lower by $874,000. Our policy dividend ratio decreased from 6.4% in 2006 to a negative 1.8% in 2007, which was largely the result of changes to our estimate for accrued dividends payable to Florida policyholders in 2006 and 2007 under a statutory formula unique to that state. On February 15, 2008, we received an order from the Florida insurance commissioner calling for us to pay approximately $3 million for the 2006 year, enabling us to reduce our carried 2006 accrual as of year-end…

In summary, of course, 2007 was an outstanding year. As I mentioned in our earlier press release, looking ahead we expect the current competitive market environment to continue through 2008. While our effective LCM may decline somewhat in 2008, we intend to continue to price our policies to appropriately cover the risk that we insure. One important reason that we can pursue this policy and this strategy is the strength of our investment portfolio, which totaled almost $760 million at the end of 2007. This portfolio generated over $30 million of net investment income in 2007 and we believe that this investment ratio provided by our portfolio differentiates us from other small cap insurance companies. We believe that in spite of the increasingly competitive market, AMERISAFE will continue to produce an underwriting profit and outstanding returns for our shareholders. As for guidance in 2008, we are providing guidance of a combined ratio of 94% or lower and a return on average shareholder equity of 15% or greater. With that, I think we should open the call for questions.

(Operator Instructions) Our first question comes from Bijan Moazami from Friedman, Billings, Ramsey.

Allen, could you tell us what LCM you are charging on your Workers Compensation premium on average during the quarter?

For the quarter, 147.

Last quarter you had some level of optimism in terms of the ability of the company to maybe show some level of top line growth. Do you still have that same level of optimism?

Well, we’re not giving top line guidance for 2008 just because we’re not sure about the competitive market, how long the current environment will stay and the impact of the lower loss cost. Which in the states where we do business, is they are more prevalent that the states had loss-cost reductions than increases. So we’re not having guidance on the top line.

You have a high-class problem, massive level of profitability, maybe a little top line. What is your plan in terms of using the excess capital?

We believe that we will produce return on average shareholder equity in 2008 of 15% or greater as we’ve indicated in our guidance. By the end of 2008 we think that should we not take any steps to manage the capital through either an acquisition, a share repurchase, or a common shareholder dividend that achieving a long term 15% ROE could be challenged. So, but we do not believe that will be a problem for 2008. We continue to look at our acquisition possibilities, but quite frankly at this point, Bijan, what we’ve seen, we feel is a bit over priced.

Our next question comes from Matt Carletti from Fox-Pitt Kelton.

In the investment portfolio, what’s the new money rate right now that you’re kind of putting cash flow into?

It’s right around 4% Matt. The actual short-term stiff rate is around 3.5% I believe, because we are building cash as well.

What was the impact of the convert shares in the quarter and what’s your fully diluted book value that you’re coming up with?

Fully diluted book value is $11.66. And Matt, remember that with the two-class method we take, let’s use the example we had $50.2 million. We take the fourth quarter net income and the percentage, 94% of the theoretical undistributed earnings applies to the preferred shareholders. So we take our full boat shares, which is around 20 million, multiply that times 94% and multiply the net income times 94% and that’s how you get that. And if you remember, we go into quite a bit of detail in trying to explain that , how should I characterize it, rather unorthodox two-class method in our 10-K.

I was calculating the same book value. I just wanted to make sure that I had the components of it right.

The actual share count at 12/31/07 was 20,027,810 shares.

Our next question comes from Mark Lane from William Blair.

Can you tell us how much of the reserve development came from ’06?

$8.6 million.

Hold on a second, I think it was $2.1 million in the quarter, $8.6 million for the full year.

In looking at the fully developed ’06 accident year, you provided this current accident year for ’07 67.8%, 67.3% for ’06 right?

Yes, I believe that’s a good figure Mark.

But the $8 million, is your ‘06 accident year fully developed as of December 31, 2007 is roughly around 65%?

Yes, that’s roughly correct. Obviously you take our accident year in ’06 divide by that net earned premium and then adjust downward for the reserve take down.

So you’re booking your loss rates for this year are almost 300 basis points higher?

How do you get that one?

Well I’m saying that your fully developed ’06 accident year is coming down quite a bit from what you booked this year.

But keep in mind that we’re always very, I’ll use the word prudent, which I like to use, on the current accident year it’s the greenest year. And we’re not going to make any moves until we really see how that current year is developing and that was true in ’06.

Can you just repeat you had given some numbers regarding the payroll adjustments for ’07 versus ’06?

Yes, this is on an enforce basis Mark. And actually I misspoke. The enforce written premium I said was up 3.6% on an enforce basis, this is voluntary Workers Comp only, not including the assigned risk. It was actually 3.7% up. The payroll percentage was up 7.6%.

But then you made some comments about what flowed through gross written premium. There were three components that you listed, the third of which was the assigned risk pool business, what impact it had on gross written premium? What was the first component?

Are you talking about, we had three components. We had payroll, premium audit related adjustments, we had EBUB, and we had the decline in the assigned risks, both pool and direct assignment.

What was the audit impact?

The first one was we had positive $13 million of such adjustments, adding to gross premiums written in 2006. That same number in 2007 was $2.4 million that reflects lower payrolls.

Our next question comes from [Al Cupercino from Madoff Securities]. [Al Cupercino: Your guidance for ’08 as far as ROE and combined ratio is actually quite similar to what it was a year ago for ’07 and of course the ’07 year turnout came in much stronger than guidance. Obviously the top line is to some extent out of your hands given whatever the competitive situation is. Presumably the ROE and combined ratio are much more in your hands. Could you help characterize for us the level of competence or conservatism you feel like goes into the ’08 guidance versus whatever levels of competence, conservatism you had a year ago for the ’07 guidance?

We know that competitive pressures will impact us in 2008. But, we are very dedicated to our underwriting discipline to produce an underwriting profit. I feel very confident at this point that a 94% combined ratio is a promise that we can make to our shareholders; that we have a very, very high probability of deliver. With respect to some of the trends that we have been seeing and I hope you picked those up in my comments, we are seeing lower claims counts, an accelerating closure rate and no explosion in severity. Will that continue, I don’t know. But, I can tell you that we feel comfortable that our reserve selections are adequate and that we have not been overly aggressive in making promises to our shareholders that we can’t deliver. So, we feel like if the trends continue, perhaps it could be better than the numbers we get. We insure a high hazard business, Al, and sometimes it’s difficult to try to predict how that will develop.

At this time we have no further questions in the queue. I would like to turn the conference back over to Mr. Bradley for any concluding comments.

Thank you ladies and gentlemen for joining us this morning. I want to make a few closing comments that I think are particularly relevant, particularly in light of what Al just asked. I’m as excited about the quality of our earnings in 2007 as I am about the quantity of those earnings. If you’ll just review our pretax earnings, you will note that we produced about $30 million of pretax earnings from net investment income. This net investment income did not receive the benefit of any significant net realized gains. Additionally, we produced about $43 million of underwriting income. In that $43 million of pretax underwriting income is included about $9.5 million of prior year favorable development and about $3.7 million of commutation benefits. The income amounted to about $1 million and our interest expense cost us about $3.5 million. The balance of these components, of our pretax earnings will provide stability to AMERISAFE’s earnings in the current and coming soft market. I believe that AMERISAFE is properly attired for a soft insurance market. Thank you for joining us today.

Thank you and ladies and gentlemen that does conclude AMERISAFE’s fourth quarter 2007 earnings conference.