Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Amphastar Pharmaceuticals Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call. At this time all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later we’ll conduct a question-and-answer session and instructions will follow at that time. [Operator Instructions]. This conference call may contain forward-looking statements, including statements relating to Amphastar Pharmaceuticals. These statements are not historical facts but rather based on Amphastar Pharmaceutical's current expectations, estimates and projections regarding Amphastar's Pharmaceutical's business operations and other similar or related factors. Words such as may, will, could, would, should, anticipate, predict, potential, continue, expect, intend, plan, project, believe, estimate and other similar or related expressions are used to identify these forward-looking statements These statements are only predictions and as such are not guarantees of future performance and they involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult or impossible to predict. Actual results may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors, including those described from time to time in Amphastar's Pharmaceuticals filings with the SEC. I would now like to turn the conference over to Mr. Jason Shandell, President of Amphastar.

Thank you, Operator. Good afternoon, and welcome to Amphastar Pharmaceuticals second quarter earnings call. My name is Jason Shandell, President of Amphastar. I'm joined today with my colleague, Bill Peters, CFO of Amphastar. We appreciate you joining us on the call today, and look forward to speaking with you and answering any questions you may have. I will now turn the call over to our CFO, Bill Peters, to discuss the second quarter financials.

Thank you, Jason. Sales for the second quarter increased 9% to $71 million from $65.2 million in the previous year's period. The biggest driver of the increase in the finished pharmaceutical product segment was Medroxyprogesterone Acetate, which was launched in the first quarter of 2018 and recorded sales of $6.4 million. Naloxone, which was this quarter's biggest selling product, saw sales increase to $11.1 million from $10.3 million on higher unit volumes. Sales of enoxaparin increased to $8.7 million from $8.3 million due to higher unit volumes as we were able to fill most of the backorder, which had led to lower sales of the product in the first quarter of 2018. Sales of our epinephrine declined to $3.7 million from $10.6 million due to the discontinuation of our epinephrine vial in the second quarter of 2017 after the FDA requested that we discontinue selling the product under our a grandfather exception. Our insulin API business had sales of $7.8 million, which were up from $1.4 million last year as mankind began placing orders under our amended 2016 supply agreement. Cost of revenue increased to $44.9 million from $38.4 million and gross margins decreased to 37% of revenues from 41% of revenues in the second quarter of last year. The contraction of gross margins was related to increased costs for heparin, which is used to enoxaparin API, and increased labor costs due to the implementation of new quality standards recently acquired by USP and higher minimum wage requirements in California. Also, the decline in sales of high-margin products like the epinephrine vial was only partially offset by new product launches of higher margin products such as the medroxyprogesterone acetate. Selling, distribution and marketing expenses increased due to expenses at our Amphastar Nanjing Pharmaceuticals subsidiary as well as higher freight costs.…

Thanks, Bill. On our last earnings call, we announced that we resubmitted our NDA for Primatene Mist but did not have a PDUFA date yet. Since then we received a PDUFA date of November 7, 2018 and we produced inventory in preparation for a launch. We remain confident that we will receive approval of Primatene Mist this year given the very good results from our human factors study and the related vent [ph] studies that we provided in our resubmission. In terms of FDA approvals, we are happy to announce that our generic version of Isuprel was approved by the agency on June 18, 2018 which was 10 days in advance of our GDUFA date. Based on the minor CRL that we received in March of 2018, we were confident that we would receive approval of this product and therefore produce inventory in advance of the GDUFA date. This allowed us to launch the product in July. It is interesting to note that the brand Isuprel is an ampoule, whereas our generic product is a vial. We believe that this gives us a competitive advantage as hospitals typically prefer vials over ampoules. To date, there have only been two other generic Isuprel products approved by the FDA, only one of which is the vial and the other being an ampoule. In addition to the approval of generic Isuprel in the second quarter, we received FDA approval of our NDA for calcium chloride injection on May 10, 2018. This was one of our unapproved product that we've been selling for many years and it remains on the FDAs drug shortage list. We also received FDA approval of our ANDA supplement for the manufacture of semi-purified heparin at our ANP subsidiary and the manufacture of heparin, sodium USP at our IMS subsidiary…

Thank you.[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Elliot Wilbur of Raymond James. Your line is open.

Hi guys, this is Lucas Lee on for Elliot. Could you provide some update on the status of returning epinephrine product to the market? Is this still expected during 2019?

First of all I don’t think we ever said it would happen in 2019, but we did file an NDA for the epinephrine prefilled syringe.

So yes, we have too historically have had two epinephrine products. One is in a prefilled syringe, and one is in a vial and so when Bill was discussing the financials and one of the products that was unapproved and removed from the market, that would vial. We continue to sell the prefilled syringe of the remains on the drug shortage list. What is public is that the prefilled syringe epinephrine, which is also an unapproved product, is now publicly known that it was filed as an NDA and that the Paragraph IV, where we are currently in a lawsuit with the RLD which is belcher [ph], and we recently filed a motion to dismiss in that case. And then with respect to the vial product, that would also be a Paragraph IV, but we have not publicly discussed that at this time.

Thank you. And if I ask one more question. So are you hearing any markets that are on potential new entrants in the Medroxyprogesterone market? Thank you.

It’s a very hard product to do so. You know TEVA [ph] had just been out of the market for several years, even though they had an approval and Sandoz has an approval, but they never launched it because of the difficulties around it. So we don't know of anybody offhand, but you never can count that out, but it is a hard product.

Yes, so just to echo’s Bill’s point, it’s extremely difficult to approve bioequivalence, such a difficult product to get FDA generic approval. And then secondly, as Bill said even with the approval, very difficult to manufacture as evidenced by the fact that Sandoz never even launched after approval.

Thank you. Our next question comes from David Maris of Wells Fargo. Your line is open.

Good afternoon. So I think the most exciting thing that happened during the quarter was the A&I [ph] development, can you talk a little bit about how this impacts the financials and the cash flow going forward? You mentioned that you will be selling into China, can you tell us the plan, is it to trying to sell products that are already approved here in the U.S. or is it to get products just approved for the Chinese market, and the same with the APIs. At API for things that Amphastar plans to make or is it only non-competitive API?

You’re starting the financial cash flow.

So starting with the financial cash flow, we raised up $57 million through this private placement, that’s going to fund the expansion of the business and most of that expansion is going to be, most of that cash is going to be used for producing or buying equipment and producing facilities that are going to do finished product, manufacturing so that we can get into that market. And one of the benefits to the parent company is that we've been funding this business and it’s been a very big cash outflow from the business for several years now, and in, when we decided on this expansion because we think that there's a great opportunity. We thought that we didn't want to completely fund it from the United States so this was a good way to free up the cash in the United States, to focus on some more of the R&D projects here and get this outside cash to fund the expansion there. Going back to the financial question, is it will be slightly accretive to earnings because of the agreements that we have between the companies ANP and Amphastar parent company are changing slightly in a way that will benefit the parent company a little bit as far as the required profitability of the subsidiary, so they'll be much – a less requirement to guarantee earnings of the China business. And then with respect to your question about the finished products and APIs. So first I agree with you, this is very exciting for the company. We've always talked about ANP as part of our vertical integration strategy and that's worked out very well. As I discussed in my prepared remarks, four of our FDA approved products use either starting material or API from ANP. So but now we…

Great. Thank you very much.

Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from David Amsellem of Piper Jaffray. Your line is open.

Thanks, just a couple. So first on Isuprel, I mean this is a product that is historically a low volume but high priced product, so when you talk about market share for a low volume market, can you elaborate on what that means, given that dynamic, I mean is that -- is it fair to say that you're going to account for if not the lion share volumes and may be a significant chunk…

Yes, so first of all is that there’s one generic idea in the market plus the brand of the second generic, the brand in one of the generic sign and time ampoules and we think it’s going to be very easy to compete against those products, but because there is one generic already on the vial, we’ll definitely have to offer a lower price to get that. So there’s really four players on the market, so getting a lion’s share of the market is really not something that we would expect. But, we would expect in this terms to get at least one of the largest customers, one of the couple largest customers out there in order to consider getting the right amount market share. So we look at in terms of specific customers, and thinking of as individual customers and the amount of volume that they tell us, that they do when we go to them with our bids.

Okay, all right. That’s helpful. And then just turning to the pipeline, in terms of the two to three additional injectables that you are going to file on later this year, do you have some metrics around that, any of them potentially could be first to market or be at market—be there at market formation among the first wave of generics and maybe what the underlying dollar value of these markets are in the aggregate, that would be helpful? Thanks.

Sure, so yes, there's actually one product that will be quite exciting. It’s a large market and it would be the first generic and then the other two are also large market but the one of the three is a very exciting product with no generic approval. And the terms of the market size of those products in total the three should be well over 350 million 400 million. So I’m trying to remember offhand, I think it’s actually over about half a billion. Yes, so it should be over about the three of them combined should be about half a billion.

Okay, that’s helpful. Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Gary Nachman of BMO Capital Markets. Your line is open.

Hi, good afternoon. First I’m Primatene, describe again why you are confident an approval with the data that you submitted and how much pre launch inventory are you building before the PDUFA, and what are the three market activities that you are doing to prepare for that launch? And then also what the status of intranasal naloxone, Jason you didn’t mention that.

Sure, so let’s start out with why we’re confident regarding Primatene and I did discuss this on the last as well. Basically we had a lot more dialogue since the last CRL with FDA. Multiple phone calls and in person meeting and really feel we got on the right page with them. And as I’ve discussed in the past, there’s a previous human factor studies were very quantitative driven and very statistical with a cumulative analysis where you know we were looking at three factors, shaking, repriming, cleaning. If you failed to clean that was a fail across the board and it was very numbers driven. In our discussions over the course of the year with the FDA, we put together a risk analysis for them. In that risk analysis we included bench studies which for instance showed that there’s only one critical task that’s the shaking, which I think is the most straight forward for a consumer to understand. They thought it was very interesting data, you know one example is cleaning. I think there’s always been a pre conception that HFA is sticky and it clogs the inhaler and that’s been the agency is experienced with Albuterol, but when we discussed the bench data we showed that this was a different product, much less alcohol, less residue, larger OFS [ph] so many reasons why it’s not apples and apples. They were intrigued by the data, so they said, please submit the bench studies in the resubmission and it would be a review issue. So we view that almost like an insurance policy because one, there’s more qualitative human factor study that we conducted based on substantial input from the FDA, including a great suggestion to not only you have the instructions for use, but actually have a wraparound label on the inhaler itself with just three clear instructions. So with their input, we went through multiple iterations, we really feel the label is about as simple as it can be now. And so the results of the study were great. You really don't even need to look at the bench data, because we think we can get approval just based on the study data. But if there were any questions regarding the study data, we feel that the backup with this risk analysis and the bench studies is the added assurance, so we feel that overall this is a much better filing at this point. It's taken a while to get here, but with the FDAs assistance we think we have a really, a great label that’s very easy to understand. And Bill can discuss the inventory.

Yes, so we made batches for a couple of reasons. One reason was that we had certain components that were going to expire if we didn't make inventory at this time. So we decided that we were planning to make inventory ahead of the PDUFA data anyway. So we decided that we start doing that this quarter. We made several batches and we had to book an expense of about $0.5 million.

Yes, so that’s in the R&D line and I’ll shift….

And finally t he third one was, what we were doing in preparation for the launch and for that one, we have discussed in the past that we definitely are going to do some marketing to let consumers know that this has been returned to the market. So we’ve met with a number of ad agencies and at this point we have a very good ad plan. We’re looking to spend multimillion dollar ad campaign but when we say multimillion, it high single digit millions. And mostly it will be in a digital campaign to reach the end users. In addition to the money we’re spending on our ad campaign, we’ve discussed how this is a very important product for the retailers, it definitely brings input traffic, which is something they need in this day and age, especially with Amazon and that so they've been excited by -- one of the retailers discussed having it in three sections of the store essentially of cough and cold, allergy behind the counter. So they’ll be also doing their own promotions. So between our ad campaign and the retailers, we think it could be a really good launch and they will get out to the vast majority of people they needed.

Okay, just a follow up on that. Have you decided pricing yet where it’s going to be, similar to where it was when it was [Indiscernible] in the market.

Well it’s going to be priced higher than it was previously. So we know that because it’s a better product than it was and it’s inflation as well. So it’s definitely higher than it was, but the exact price is yet to be determined. And in some ways, would be a little bit based on some negotiations with the drug stores and also have to do with maybe some of the – we might have some initial discounting to just to get it out there couponing that sort of thing, but which will affect in that price, but overall we expect this to be higher priced. And also remember that there are fewer uses per container as well. So if someone was using this on a semi regular basis then the annualized cost would be higher for that as well.

Okay. And will it be a higher margin product, I’m assuming than the rest of your business right now.

Yes, it will be higher margin than the rest of the business and the other thing you have to remember is that right now we have about $0.5 million a quarter going to the COGS line from that factory. So the incremental cost associated with the cost of goods with that product are just the variable cost at this point. So it should be especially initially, it should be a very profitable product for us incrementally and give us a lot of operating leverage.

Okay and then the last question was on intranasal naloxone, Jason.

Yes, so I didn’t have an update this time. On the last call we had mentioned the major issue at this point we’re in agreement with the FDA and all the points of their CRL except the volume issue. And so on the last call, I announced that we had submitted actual use data to the agency to support the volume that we were proposing because that was their request that if we could show data actual use pediatric use that shows that our proposed volume does not have any significant adverse events then they would consider the volume and our program could be back on track. The data was very compelling. We've submitted that to the agency. I believe it was several weeks before our call in May, so we were expecting a response either in July or August, so we will provide an update hopefully by the next call, we’ll have a response and the path forward.

Okay. All right. Thank you very much.

Definitely.

Thank you. Our next question is from David Steinberg of Jefferies. Your line is open.

Thanks, a couple of questions. Just wanted to follow up first on Gary’s question about Primatene. [Indiscernible] has had such a torture history and had way too many CRLs, I know that since the last call you exited [ph] the PDUFA date and during that period if you actually had further discussions with the FDA which gives you gives you more confidence in the positive outcome in early November? And then related to that, you know back in the day when it was a well-known brand as well, it created TV ads that help make it so, and I was just wondering what sort of advertising either on TV or print media, or other types of media are you are you planning then? Secondly on the – this light undisclosed generic you are hoping to get approval on later this year. And how many years has this been – has generics has it been pretty [ph] has it been off patent, and is the product still growing? Thanks.

Sure, so starting with Primatene, yes it’s definitely been a saga, and that we do believe that you know the label is really been revised to a point that did so simple and I think in this environment right now it's a good time to COTC [ph] approvals and will help with drug pricing. In terms of communications with the agency we are still communication, yes they’ve had some questions, asked for some sample, had – but no major issues at this point. So at this stage we consider no news good news, but we are still in communication, but no major information request at this stage. And then in terms of TV ads, when we met with the ad agency it’s a really reputable agency. They have done some really great commercials. I was interested in what the cost of that would be, but it’s prohibitive to say the least. So that’s why we will be focused mostly on digital but of course in those digital there are the old TV commercials on YouTube and – but this will be very much digitally driven in the then age of Google you can pay for a click, if somebody put’s in ads money and we want Primatene to be at the top of the list. So this will be a digital campaign for the most part. And then finally, with regard to the GDUFA, the large undisclosed product. It’s been of patent for quite a while. We won’t go into the specific details as you know for competitive reasons. We really don’t want to reveal what the product is, but it’s been off patent for quite some time and the market remains strong.

Okay, thanks.

Sure.

Thank you. I’m showing no further questions at this time. I like to turn the conference back over to Jason Shandell for any closing remarks.

Thank you very much operator. This concludes our call. Hope everyone has a great day.