Greetings, and welcome to the AMG Fourth Quarter 2020 Earnings Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to your host, Ms. Anjali Aggarwal, Head of Investor Relations for AMG. Thank you. You may begin.

Good morning and thank you for joining us today to discuss AMG's results for the fourth quarter of 2020. Before we begin, I'd like to remind you that during this call, we may make a number of forward-looking statements which could differ from our actual results materially and AMG assumes no obligation to update these statements. A replay of today's call will be available on the Investor Relations section of our website along with a copy of our earnings release, and a reconciliation of any non-GAAP financial measures, including any earnings guidance announced on this call. In addition, we posted an updated investor presentation to our website this morning and encourage investors to consult our site regularly for updated information. With us today to discuss the company's results for the quarter are Jay Horgen, President and Chief Executive Officer; and Tom Wojcik, Chief Financial Officer. With that, I'll turn the call over to Jay.

Thanks, Anjali, and good morning, everyone. 2020 was an extraordinary year and the consistent execution of AMG's long-term strategy resulted in strong business performance and growth. Complex operating conditions and volatile markets accelerated transition across the investment management industry, with a number of our peers and competitors pursuing scale, while others look to divest or exit businesses altogether. Throughout this period, AMG remained committed to our fundamental principles. That investment performance is about skill, not scale. That investment alpha is best generated by differentiated active managers and that the entrepreneurial investment-centric cultures of independent partner-owned firms offer clients the greatest opportunity for alpha. As a result, we remain focused on executing our long-term strategy with excellence and discipline. Our Affiliates built on their strong long-term performance records, demonstrating our ability to distinguish themselves across market cycles, including during volatile periods like 2020. Today, approximately three-quarters of our products are outperforming their long-term benchmarks on an EBITDA basis. Our Affiliates also continue to evolve and enhance their product offerings, often in collaboration with AMG, expanding their abilities to meet long-term client needs. And we welcomed four new Affiliates in the past year, all of which operate in areas of strong secular growth, including sustainable and impact investing, private markets, and global equities. Overall, AMG emerged from this, from the unprecedented events of 2020 in an even stronger position than we entered the year. And we enter 2021 with significant momentum across our business and substantial capacity and flexibility to generate meaningful additional earnings growth and shareholder value. Turning to our results. Since the second quarter of 2020, the earnings power of our business has increased considerably, driven by the strong and improving performance from the large majority of our Affiliates, combined with the impact of strategic investments and actions we have…

Thank you, and good morning, everyone. As Jay discussed, strategic changes taking place in our industry are creating significant disruption, and that disruption is highlighting AMG's longstanding belief in the value proposition of independent partner-owned firms and their unique alignment with their clients. At the same time, focused execution against our strategy is producing results in both our quarterly earnings and our expectations for future growth. We enter 2021 with significant momentum across our business, increasing earnings power and a stronger and more flexible balance sheet to execute on the considerable opportunities ahead of us to generate shareholder value. Turning to the quarter. Adjusted EBITDA of $255 million grew 27% year-over-year driven by strength in both management and performance fees, and economic earnings per share of $4.22 benefited from an enhanced level of share repurchase activity. AMG delivered strong earnings growth despite net client cash outflows of $15.8 billion that were driven by certain quantitative strategies and seasonal client redemptions. Quantitative strategies accounted for 95% of outflows in the quarter while contributing approximately 3% of run rate EBITDA. Away from quant and taking into account seasonality, our underlying organic growth trends continued to improve, and client flows were positive in the quarter. Strong investment performance and an increasingly attractive environment for allocating to active managers drove further stabilization in fundamental equities. And Affiliate strategies across illiquid alternatives, wealth management and specialty fixed income generated significant positive net flows and continue to contribute an increasing proportion of our earnings. Turning to our asset class breakdown and excluding challenged quantitative strategies. In alternatives, we reported net inflows of $700 million in the fourth quarter, reflecting ongoing momentum across our illiquid alternative Affiliates. Strength in private markets was partially offset by $2 billion in seasonal redemptions and certain liquid alternative strategies with fourth…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Craig Siegenthaler with Credit Suisse.

So as we look at your pipeline of potential transactions, can you talk about the composition of both majority investments and also minority investments or some of these new growth capital type transactions that you guys have been pivoting into?

Yes. Thanks, Craig. Thank you for the question. Let me start, and I'll get to the majority and minority and growth capital aspects of this. First thing I'd like to say is, our model is resonating. It's evidenced by our four new investments we made since the middle part of 2019. Each of these businesses are high quality businesses. Obviously, that is the most important aspect of our investment thesis, is to find the highest quality, independent, partner-owned firms. And we think we've done that with the most recent four. Each of them offer growth opportunities, and they each represent slightly different reasons for partnering with us. In the case of Comvest, in particular, that was one where growth capital was a key consideration, and I'll come back to that in a moment. The -- as we said in the prepared remarks, we do offer support throughout the whole life cycle of an Affiliate's needs. So our solution set today includes succession planning, which is a majority investment concept; minority investments, typically more for liquidity; growth capital; and distribution support. So across that framework, when you look at the most recent four investments, each of the last four investments have taken advantage of our distribution support, signing up in the initial transaction at the time of the transaction to go on to our global distribution platform. The -- in each case, these have all been minority stakes. I think that they came to us for various reasons, and that was the opportunity for us. But majority versus minority really depends more on the needs of the Affiliates or the prospects. And as we look at our current pipeline, we have a mix of both, and we would expect to do both over the medium term. When I look at the…

Our next question comes from the line of Dan Fannon with Jefferies.

So a couple of questions just in terms of the outlook. So I guess, first, in the fourth quarter, were there some impairments or write-downs to kind of -- or some of the kind of one-off items in terms of your addbacks? And then just trying to separate the beta of the strength, obviously of 2020 and that versus kind of the momentum in your business that you can control or your Affiliates control in terms of performance. So if you could kind of highlight the areas of organic growth opportunity that you see as the most incremental in terms of improvement as you think about 2021 versus this past year?

Yes. So I'm going to let Tom take the first part of your question, and then maybe I'll come -- I'll circle back, Dan. Thank you for your question.

Sure. Thanks, Dan. So on the impairment question, look, there wasn't really anything meaningful in the quarter, kind of a couple of little things here and there, and you saw our guidance for the first quarter going back to the $40 million level, so not much to speak of there. In terms of kind of overall growth opportunities, you touched specifically on organic growth, and I'll share a couple of things, and I'm sure Jay will give some more color. But remember, for us, it's really going to be a combination of organic growth, performance and performance fees being driven by that great performance in our business, the ability to make new investments in growing areas both from an earnings growth perspective and an organic growth perspective and then allocating our capital repurchases and the ability to drive our share count, and ultimately, earnings compounding through that as well. So I think there are a number of areas beyond beta, frankly, where we're able to translate strong market performance through our capital allocation into long-term growth in a variety of areas in our business. In terms of those areas where we are seeing significant momentum, both Jay and I touched on in our prepared remarks the number of areas where we see strong secular growth opportunities, private markets and illiquid alternatives, where businesses like Pantheon, Baring Asia, EIG and Comvest have seen very strong flows over the course of the past couple of years, continue to be in the market actively with new funds virtually at all times, given the diversity of those businesses. And we anticipate those businesses to continue to grow at double-digit rates organically collectively into the future. Specialty fixed income and traditional fixed income. We have a number of Affiliates who have very unique, high-performing products in those areas. Garda had an excellent year, Capula. GW&K on the muni side, again, very strong; and then in wealth management, where, again, we continue to see sticky, long duration flows coming in. So those areas have been strong over the last couple of years. We anticipate them being strong into the future. And as I mentioned in my prepared remarks, and Jay spoke to as well, given the very strong and improving performance that we're seeing in our fundamental active equities book, where more than 80% of our assets are above benchmark over the 5-year period, we are starting to see some really nice trends in terms of core organic growth once you strip out quant and seasonality. That number was positive overall for the business this quarter. And as you think about kind of the environment for active today, coupled with the strong performance that we have, we do believe that we have very good tailwinds behind us in terms of flow opportunities in the future with respect to our active equities book.

Yes. That was a good summary. Maybe if I had a few things to add here, Dan. First is, look, I recognize that our top-line flows require you to do more work on the underlying growth of the business. So we recognize that, and we're trying to help you get to that level. Tom just mentioned away from quantitative flows and there was some seasonality, but we would expect and have seen our -- the rest of our business in positive territory. But really away from that, because what really -- is really hard to see is, obviously, we own different amounts of those Affiliates, and they have different structures. So -- and some of them often offer performance fees. So maybe if I can share a perspective, which is our AUM levels are near medium-term highs here, which generate significant management fees. Our non-quant flows have turned positive in the fourth quarter ex seasonality. We had new investments in 2020, and the full effect won't be seen until 2021, and that's in our guidance for those amounts. We are assuming kind of a 10% performance fee. Frankly, given high watermarks, given the growth in the -- in some of our alternative products, it could be much greater than that. If you kind of look at where Tom centered you in the midpoint of 920-ish of EBITDA and kind of $16.25 in economic earnings per share, that really does reflect relatively modest performance fee assumptions, just what we're seeing in our normal convention with management fees, the carryover effect of new investments and a modest level of capital deployment. If we have new investments where we purchase more shares or have higher performance fees, then you'd be looking at the very top of the range. So I do think that we have significant organic growth. It's just the benefit of it is hard to see because the immateriality of the AUM of the quant managers is obfuscating the underlying growth of the business.

Our next question comes from the line of Bill Katz with Citi.

Maybe just go the other way. As you look at your platform and trying to help investors sort of get to sort of fundamental value of the company, seeing some of the other deals that happened in 2020, maybe a 2-part question. One is, what's the concept of potentially selling some underperforming Affiliates? And then can you talk to pricing a little bit, just given some of the strategic deals that have happened last year as well as the sort of the enclosing by SPACs into the business as well?

Yes. Thanks, Bill, and good morning to you. Look, we have high conviction on our strategy, which is to be the partner of choice of independent partner-owned firms. We think that, that is the place where active is that it's very best, where outperformance will be experienced by clients around the world. And we're seeing, obviously, some -- and maybe even some momentum in flows going towards active away from passive. And so that's something that we're seeing. We have high conviction that the growth of our business is still in front of us with respect to continuing to execute our strategy by investing in existing Affiliates, investing in new Affiliates. I think you've heard us say, really now for two years, about two years ago, we engaged with a half dozen or so of our Affiliates that were facing headwinds to address issues and to work through those headwinds. That's largely behind us now. It did lead to different ultimate resolutions strategically. But that is because we worked with the partners, and it was ultimately driven by the partnerships, not AMG, and that is behind us. I think that allowed us to free up capital and resources for our growth opportunities. You're seeing some of that come through our results now, and I think you'll see some of that come through our results in 2021. As far as our stable of Affiliates, we have tremendous diversity in our business, as evidenced over the last two, three years and how we've come back with the profile that we have. We are a permanent -- we take a permanent partnership approach. And ultimately, we think that, that is why Affiliates have chosen us. That is our uniqueness in the market. There really isn't anyone else like us, and we think that's what's going to drive value for shareholders.

Our next question comes from the line of Patrick Davitt with Autonomous Research.

So you have a fair amount of new investments plugging into global distribution. Could you maybe help us frame based on past experience of doing that, maybe what the kind of timeline is for seeing incremental flows from the new investment being made, getting plugged in the global distribution and then seeing new mandates result from that?

Yes. Thanks, Patrick, and good morning. So look, distribution to AMG, it's a combination of the excellent sales efforts that exist at our individual Affiliates but also augmented by the complementary offering that we have purpose-built at AMG to help those Affiliates scale. I think you know this, we started our centralized distribution 10, 15 years ago now. We raised more than $100 million -- $100 billion, excuse me, $100 billion for our Affiliates across product types and client segments. So each of these new Affiliates have come online. We've already started to raise assets for Garda and for Comvest. It does take a little time, and COVID slowed us down a bit in 2020, but we have raised assets. We have mandates in each case. Both Jackson Square and Boston Common have joined our retail platform, and we'll be supporting their retail efforts there. So we do expect to generate flows for all four of those Affiliates in a relatively short period. I think we would expect over the next months and year to see flows maybe in each of those from incremental flows from work that we're doing at AMG. But let me also mention why I think that's the case because we made a number of adjustments in the past two years. I think we've talked about this as well in addition to working with certain of our Affiliates that I mentioned a moment ago in facing headwinds. We also adjusted our own platform and evolved our strategy and approach to the market to really focus on areas that are growing, pulling resources away from those areas that aren't in and adding resources to areas that are. So for example, in institutional, we've added resources on the private market side. We've broadened our alternative offering; and with Boston Common, we'll be offering an ESG product. We also -- we continue to look at the new regions that we would want to go into, and we do have kind of open searches for more resources in areas that we think are going to grow. So we are putting more effort towards those growth initiatives. So that gives us confidence in adding these four Affiliates as well as our existing Affiliate base. On the U.S. retail and wealth side, we've struck a partnership with iCapital again to help us on the alternatives. We've also added resources in technology and home office to really plug into the wirehouses where it's really an institutional sale, and then, ultimately, you need the sales support. We believe the U.S. retail channel is actually a huge opportunity for us and that we're going to continue to push forward in U.S. retail to drive value. You'll likely hear more from us on this. And as we make progress, we'll give you more details. But going back to your original question, I do see flows for each of these Affiliates over the relatively short period.

Our next question comes from the line of Alex Blostein with Goldman Sachs.

I was hoping maybe to round out the organic growth discussion a little more and given the strong momentum in the business, can you guys help us understand what the organic EBITDA growth for AMG is expected to be for '21, so again, kind of like excluding impact of market performance and any purchases of either new or existing Affiliates? And I guess, as investors try to evaluate sort of the longer-term growth profile of company -- of this company, can you kind of -- I understand like kind of pinpointing it to a single year might be difficult, but what is the organic EBITDA growth that you're ultimately aspiring to have over the next several years?

So thanks, Alex. I'm going to let Tom answer that. Very nuanced and complicated question to answer, but Tom, I'll let you give it a shot.

Sure. Thanks for your question, Alex. So look, the comp organic EBITDA growth is obviously an important one. There's a lot that goes into that, particularly for a business like ours, where we do have a sizable performance fee component to a lot of these businesses. And also, frankly, we have a variety of different ownership and structural stakes in our underlying Affiliates. So it's not a stat that we've disclosed, but I think it's something that as you think about the overall mix of our business, you can probably get some visibility into. If you think about where we stand today, obviously, the majority of the outflows we're seeing continue to be on the quant side. And while 95% of our outflows this quarter came in quant strategies, again, just to restate, that was only 3% of our EBITDA on a run rate basis. I'd also note that it is worth pointing out that challenged quant AUM peaked in early 2018 and has basically been cut in half since then, meaning that any flow activity from here is coming off of a much smaller base. And I'd also note that we've seen some pretty strong performance the last couple of months there. So hopefully, we can build on that going forward. If you then kind of look more broadly at the shape of our overall Affiliate base, across illiquids, wealth management and specialty fixed income, I think we've noted in the past, that's about a third of our EBITDA today. It continues to grow as a percentage of our overall business. And then similarly, as you look to areas like liquid alternatives, ESG, global and emerging market equities, where we have very strong performance track records and also where active management continues to provide a very strong value proposition to clients, we look at all of those areas as being places where we can see strong growth into the future. And then similarly, I know you sort of asked to exclude this, but I really don't think you can think about the AMG thesis without including the impact of new investments, both in terms of the earnings that they bring to our platform, but just as importantly, the fact that we're proactively investing in businesses and partnering with businesses that are delivering leading organic growth trends, given the secular areas that we're prosecuting when we really think about partnerships. So when you put all those things together and you look at the overall shape of our business, I think we feel very strongly that over the intermediate to long-term, kind of the footprint, if you will, of where our Affiliates operate, the client demand trends in those areas and their investment performance should be in a position to drive organic AUM, EBITDA growth, et cetera, over the long-term.

Yes. And look, I even think we're well positioned in the short-term as well because the three-quarters of our fundamental equities and alternatives are beating benchmarks on a 5-year basis, similar kind of strong on a 3-year. They distinguished themselves in 2020 in periods of volatility. So they're really well positioned to take in organic growth. Of course, we also mentioned that our private markets, our specialty fixed income and our wealth businesses have been strong for some time now. And so it is just mix question of when does the mix turn in favor, and it looks like it turned in the fourth quarter, actually, on an EBITDA basis. On a headline flow number, it didn't, obviously, but on an EBITDA basis, it's pretty close. And I think that's the reason for the optimism here, which is you could see it, it could be the first quarter. It could be this year.

Our next question comes from the line of Robert Lee with KBW.

The -- I guess, Jay, maybe just curious, I mean, you talked about how you differentiate from some others in the marketplace, permanent solutions. Some of those other competitors [indiscernible] and others have been in place for a while now, have done multiple acquisitions. But are you starting to see at all that some -- maybe some of those managers who sell revenue shares or whatnot to some of those other -- pardon me, funds out there are starting to say, "Hey, we need a more permanent solution now. It's been a while. That was fine for what it was." I mean, do you see that as a source of potential investments going forward?

Thanks for your question, Rob. Yes. Let me try to address it. I'm going to get to that question. I actually realized that I'm going to throw structure and pricing in here, too, because I think I failed to mention that in an earlier question. But if I can just take the overall universe of transactions that happen in asset management, and I think it's important because there is a lot of activity in our industry right now. I think everybody knows it. There are some people who are divesting. There are some people who are trying to consolidate. Obviously, we are very focused on independent partner-owned firms and our model to invest with and align our business with those firms in a way that supports them through the entire life cycle. So that is only a subset of transactions in the marketplace. We don't see our Affiliates really wanting a level of consolidation. They chose us because they did not want to be consolidated. And so I want to just leave that on the side because those are types of transactions that we don't see appropriate for our business and probably really don't affect us. So a firm that might be independent who really wants to turn the keys over to someone else, that's not a transaction that we would do. So I think that's the starting place. Now we're into the segment of the population of independent firms who don't want to sell out, who do want to remain independent. There, we have a myriad of competitors, but I will separate that group into illiquid managers and everything else. So if I say, let me focus on everything else, the competitive opportunity set for us is extremely great because there are very few competitors today. Most of our…

Our next question comes from the line of Brian Bedell with Deutsche Bank.

Most of my questions have been asked and answered. Maybe just one on the core EBITDA fee rate, Tom. It's been improving in the last three quarters, looks like from about 10 basis points to over 11 basis points just in terms of the outlook coming into '21. I guess, what's your confidence that, that might further improve from the 11 basis points? I know we do get a positive mix shift as we get -- given the quantitative outflows that are at a very low EBITDA fee rate. But you also mentioned, I think, lower corporate expenses in that in 4Q. So just trying to get a sense of that? And then also for Jackson Square, how much AUM did they add in the fourth quarter? I'm not sure if anything else was coming through in 1Q for that.

Great. Thanks, Brian. Let me try and hit a few of those. We have seen some positive trends in terms of that overall fee rate, if you will, a lot of that being driven by strength in some of those core secular growth areas like illiquids and relative value fixed income. Also, frankly, the strength in markets and outperformance at some of our active equity Affiliates like Harding Loevner and Veritas, also, I think, continue to be quite positive for us. And I think you mentioned the point around our management of expenses. As we talked about a number of times in the past, I think we've taken a very hard look at the business. And we're really running, I think, very lean today in terms of making sure that all of our resources are put up against the best and highest use, and we're driving toward growth. So I think those trends all feel like they are moving in the right direction. And I think, hopefully, we should continue to see that same type of impact as the business moves forward. In terms of Jackson Square, about $10 billion came through our AUM. That was the only thing that was running through in the quarter. And again, that business continues to perform incredibly well, and we're very excited about that partnership.

Our next question comes from the line of Mike Carrier with Bank of America.

Just given the strong performance fees in 4Q and in your guidance, 1Q and '21, so can you provide a bit more color on the base growth? And maybe some color around organic revenue growth versus the organic asset growth, whether for full year '20 or 4Q heading into '21, just given some of the fee rate nuances that you guys see?

Yes. So yes, Tom, why don't you take that? I would just also mention the perspective we have in the first quarter just given some of our Affiliate timing of reporting to just when you incorporate all of that into the question.

Sure. So maybe just a couple of words on performance fees to start. We do have a very diverse base of performance fee generative Affiliates. They generally tend to contribute somewhere in the neighborhood of 10% of economic net income, and we were a little bit ahead of that last year at 11%. And we've noted sort of a midpoint of the range in our guidance at around 10%, and again, we think with some upside from here. You can think about performance fees really kind of in three buckets: concentrated long-only, which will be impacted by a combination of security selection and markets; absolute return strategies, which include a variety of businesses like Garda, Capula, Systematica, who have been performing very well amidst recent volatility; and then illiquids, where we continue to build a carried interest bank that will be an excellent longer-term opportunity for us. That diverse book from year-to-year, different Affiliates tend to contribute. But over the long-term, right, we believe we have a very diverse base that's differentiated in terms of its ability to both deliver performance, and then, ultimately, performance fees. And as we come into this year, we did give you guidance for a very strong first quarter. We've got pretty good visibility into a couple of Affiliates on the liquid alternative side who have put up very strong performance, and we'll see some crystallizations. And again, similar to our strong fourth quarter performance this year, we do have that seasonality where the first quarter and the fourth quarter tend to be our biggest performance fee generative times of the year. In terms of your other questions, in underlying growth, I think we touched on a lot of it, both in our prepared remarks and in some of the Q&A today. But really, you've…

Yes. And look, I don't think just -- we did it in the prepared remarks, we didn't really get many questions on this, but we really improved our balance sheet last year. We doubled the duration of our balance sheet. We added some equity content to it. We actually -- from some of the repositioning that we did, we ended up with significant tax savings, which came through our economic earnings but they actually hit our bank accounts towards the end of the year, which led to us buying more shares in the fourth quarter, which was very fortuitous because we ultimately elevated our share repurchases right into good performance. And that's why we're indicating to you that we're going to do 200, something 200 or maybe north. And then if you just look at our balance sheet today, we have $1 billion of cash, in the cash and equivalents section of our balance sheet. Now that's not all ours. Typically, it's about half ours, but that is a significant number as we flex into this first half of the year. And we would like to, obviously, as Tom said, increase both our growth investments this year, which we've allocated in our budgeting but it’s not in our numbers. Just to be clear, it is not in our numbers. And then what we do expect is something in the neighborhood of 500 with an elevated first quarter for the year. Could it be more than that? Sure, it could be more than that. So there is real upside to even the range that we've given, given the momentum of our business.

Our final question this morning comes from the line of Chris Shutler with William Blair.

It's been a while since you did a deal in the wealth management space, and I know valuations there can be tricky right now given all the competition. But are you seeing any opportunities there? Or alternatively, are there ways to distinguish yourself from other buyers in that space? And then another quick one, just on the guidance. I just wanted to get the market blend they're using for the first quarter.

So let me take the first one, Tom, maybe you can follow up on that, on the market one. So yes, Chris, thanks for your question. We still are very active looking at wealth businesses. We actually continue to have an investment in [Wealth Capital Partners], a minority investment. They are very active in acquiring. And so we've actually benefited from their growth as well. We have had some in our pipeline. We continue to have some in our pipeline. You're right, valuations are tricky. What's interesting, though, is that for some of the larger scale ones, the needs are different than kind of high price and in part being part of kind of a roll-up strategy. So we are competing well there. And while I would say that sort of the concentration is maybe lower than other areas that we are focused on like illiquids and ESG, we do have some in our pipeline. And I would say that we do offer a differentiated solution because the permanent partnership for businesses that are already scaled and they're looking to either extend or they're going through succession planning, that is where we differentiate ourselves. Tom?

And just a quick answer on your other question, we're assuming 2.5% in terms of our market blend as of Friday.

Ladies and gentlemen, that concludes our question-and-answer session. I'll turn the floor back to Mr. Horgen for any final comments.

Thank you all again for joining us this morning. AMG had a strong finish to 2020. But as discussed, the earnings power of our business has increased considerably, and we remain focused on the significant growth opportunities ahead of us. I hope everyone remains safe and healthy, and we look forward to speaking with you next quarter. Thank you.

Thank you. This concludes today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.