Good morning. My name is Jacob, and I will be your conference facilitator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the AMC Networks' Second Quarter 2019 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all parties will be in listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Thank you. I will now turn the call over to your host, Seth Zaslow, Senior Vice President of Investor Relations. Sir, the floor is yours.

Thank you. Good morning and welcome to the AMC Networks’ second quarter 2019 earnings conference call. Joining us this morning our members of our executive team Josh Sapan, President and Chief Executive Officer; Ed Carroll, Chief Operating Officer; and Sean Sullivan, Chief Financial Officer. Following a discussion of the Company's second quarter 2019 results, we will open the call for questions. If you don't have a copy of today's earnings release, it is available on our website at amcnetworks.com. This call can also be accessed via our website. Please take note of the following. Today's discussion may contain statements that constitute Forward-Looking Statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Investors are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of the future performance or results and involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ. Please refer to the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission for a discussion of risks and uncertainties. The Company disclaims any obligation to update the forward-looking statements that may be discussed during this call. Further, we will discuss non-GAAP financial information. We believe the presentation of non-GAAP results provides you with useful supplemental information concerning the Company's ongoing operations and is appropriate in your evaluation of the Company's performance. For further details, please refer to the press release and related footnotes for GAAP information and a reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP information, which we will refer to on this call. With that, I would now like to turn the call over to Josh.

Good morning and thank you for joining us. We delivered solid results in the second quarter and I'm pleased to say we remain on-track to meet our financial targets for the full-year. We continue to deliver on our key financial objectives including growing adjusted operating income, generating strong free cash flow and using our capital to position the business for the long-term. As we have discussed on prior calls, AMC Networks’ strategic priorities have been and continue to be creating great content, maximizing the long-term value of our traditional linear business and diversifying our revenue by developing new avenues of content monetization through our expanding studio, as well as our growing direct-to-consumer interests. Later on the call, I will take the opportunity to provide more dimension on our direct-to-consumer reference, including details around both our evolution and overall strategy in this area. I'm pleased to say we continue to make significant progress on these goals in 2019. Our content highlights include our recently announced landmark partnership with Universal Studios for the first ever theatrical movie set in The Walking Dead Universe and our very strong showing when Emmy nominations were announced earlier this month, including having two out of eight outstanding drama nominations for Killing Eve and Better Call Soul in a year that had the largest group of submissions ever. We have managed advertising in a difficult comp environment and had a strong upfront driven by high demand for a show with very strong increases in pricing and we continue to grow our direct-to-consumer services, adding the most D2C subs over a six month period that we ever have. I would like to begin by expanding on our content highlights if I may. At our core AMC Networks is a premium content Company with a reputation for excellence and…

Thanks and good morning. We are pleased of our results in the second quarter as total Company revenues were $772 million, AOI was $232 million and adjusted EPS was $2.60. The Company continues to generate very healthy levels of free cash flow $85 million in the quarter and $229 million for the six months ended June 2019. And we remain firmly on-track to meet our total Company targets for the full-year. I will touch on the outlook in more detail later on in my remarks. So moving to the performance of our operating segments at the National Networks Q2 revenues decreased 4% to $605 million, AOI was $236 million an increase of 1% as compared to the prior year period. Advertising revenue in the quarters decreased 11%. As we have highlighted on our last call, results were influenced by the timing of originals, in particular, fewer episodes of The Walking Dead and Fear the Walking Dead as compared to the prior year period. However, a number of factors helped to offset the unfavorable comparison, including growth at each of our other four networks, BBC America, IFC, Sundance and WE TV as well as increased pricing across our portfolio of network. With respect to distribution, distribution revenue increased 1%. As for the subscription revenue component, revenues were essentially flat with a prior period. In addition to the quarterly fluctuation based on the timing of various agreements, renewals and adjustments, we continue to see moderation mainly due to macro factors as we mentioned on our last call. In addition, our second quarter results were impacted by the interpretation of a contractual provision with one of our distribution partners. We're in discussions with this partner and are hopeful that will resolve our differences in the near future. As for the content licensing component…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Michael Nathanson [MoffettNathanson Research].

Thanks. I have one for Sean one for Joss. Sean let me start with your for a second. Could you just help us with more details on the affiliate revenue line? What was the change in subscribers this quarter? And then what's the impact of that contract dispute? Could you scale up for us? And then I have one for Josh.

Hey Michael, it's Josh. I will just give you if I may some response to your first question. There is just to say if we have an MVPD, who we have are in conversations with about contractual interpretation happens periodically in the nature of life and contracts that go over several years as the business changes. We think it’s one thing, they think it's another. We are currently actively engaged in conversations with them about it. I can't report how those conversations will conclude their dynamic and activism speed. Second piece of what was responsible for this, I guess it's a few million dollars in a quarter change in perspective is subscriber growth among the MVPD universe. As you know perhaps better than I in this and the quarter trended down a bit. So that of course is we are paid on individual units of subscribers affects us. So those are the two things you asked about and that is the State of the Union on that.

Okay. And Josh, can I actually about the film partnership. I'm trying to understand the economic interest on your side. So are you guys producing the show 100% taking the risks. So could you give a sense of what's the actually economic relationship here? And how could that film actually then maybe help other parts of the larger AMC franchise. So a little bit more of a film details for us.

Sure. So let me just offer if I may - just provide context, if I may. I just think first if you don't mind, Michael, I will say that it's a really excellent vital sign from our point of view, in my point of view, that the opportunity to bring the franchise to the big screen is now partnered with a preeminent studio that has obviously, the track record of Universal speaks for itself. And so I just would note that that is an affirmation of those experts at the highest level, in the belief that the Walking Dead on a worldwide basis will be something that people will go to pay dollars to in the silver screen. And I just as it relates to the Walking Dead and which we now have three television series on games, merchandising, that is a meaningful piece of activity. And I will say that there was interest fairly widely among studios to do that. It was not unique, singular, and therefore it is a representation and an affirmation of strength and franchise. If you don't mind that comment, I think it's important. I'm not at liberty to go into details on the nature of the deal for us. It's sort of privilege information so what I would say is it’s very nice to have a movie for all the reasons we said, I'm sorry I'm going to have to stop short of getting into the who owns what and who gets what fees it is privileged information.

Okay, hurray for the move it then Josh.

Okay good. You can pre buy tickets somewhere, not now but soon.

Okay.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Marci Ryvicker with Wolfe Research.

Thanks. I have two, when you talk about sub-trends trending down, can you give us what they are down this quarter versus last year relative to last quarter versus last year? That is the first question and the second question the subs on your SVOD and OTT services what percent are domestic versus international today and for all the targets that you gave are you including international as well?

Sure Marci. Just if I may, just on the subscriber counts, I think you receive I mean it, on reports everyone reports on subscribers as part of their filings, so we are subject to what the world is doing. Every company I think recently reported all the big ones, AT&T, Direct TV, Charter, Comcast et cetera. So that little look at the data would reveal exactly what is happening in universe and while we don’t track precisely with that I think you will see that we are significantly affected by that trend that I think that would give you a pretty clear picture of what that looks like. In terms of the subscription video-on-demand, the out year look does include international which we have not yet mined that. Significantly as I mentioned, we have much more experience with domestic performance, we have some experience with international, just beginning - so it does include both pieces of the business as we take a full-year look.

And Marci this is Ed. I would say on the subscriber additions that we mentioned today, the 400,000 subscriber uptick that is substantially all U.S., we have really just begun operation for Acorn in Mexico and Australia for example. We have a little bit of Sundance now and Shutter in the UK and Germany, but by and large those subs almost all U.S. centric at this point, it’s very early days for international expansion.

Okay. Thank you.

Thank you. We have a question from Michael Morris with Guggenheim Securities.

Thank you good morning. Two questions or two topics if I could. First, Josh you mentioned the series that come back to AMC as they come off mainstream SVOD, can you talk a little bit more about your decision process about what to do with those series, how you way maybe reselling them externally versus keeping them internally and what those economics look like? And then second, on your specialty SVOD services and the targets you just gave us is that revenue solely subscription revenue and can you talk a little bit about the content that you need to build those to where you want to be and what the margins of those businesses could kind of look like overtime compared to your existing businesses? Thanks.

Sure. So Michael the series of comeback will present us with decisions which I would actually characterize as opportunities happily. We will be in the privilege position of being able to make a determinations series-by-series about where and in what manner we can deploy them to optimize value. It’s something that is very much in the news in our industry today. Our opportunities will be, of course, to sell them to third-parties and evaluate on a worldwide basis, what that economic opportunity is and as our subscription services grow will also evaluate utilizing them themselves, including on AMC Premiere and on the four services that we mentioned. Just to complicate the answer, Michael, those answers may overlap. We could make a decision, because it's our decisions that - and this is simply hypothetical in certain geographies they are sold to others, for a discrete period of time, where we might not develop your own services and in other areas, we take them for ourselves. And the market does work that way. So we will make determinations on a series-by-series basis, balancing the values that we can drive on our own services, versus the money that we can yield from third-party services. And there is also although it's not much talked about in the SVOD world, there is a subject of exclusivity and non-exclusivity and so we will have that to make a determination about as well. The good news is, and it really is nice news is a number of these series, as you well know, have significantly established constituencies, reputation, histories and awards. And we have many humans and frankly, generations that have been under exposed. And so I think we're going to see that because we have in our genetics, a fair amount of quality and prestige and recognition, I do think that they are going to be of extraordinary value to us, as we make a determination about exactly to deploy them. As to your second question, our services are commercial free. There are no ads in them. Today, there are no ads contemplated for them for the future. So everything we talked about, really does presume and assume, and is commercial free subscription around passion at targeted groups. The whole subject of AVOD is a separate subject, which we are in and we can discuss in a different conversation. But what we're doing is these services are all commercial free, and the plan is for them to be commercial free.

If I can, Michael as it relates to your content question for example for Acorn. Many of its most popular programs are produced or coproduced by Acorn and against reasonable economics. So some of the breakout shows like Manhunt, and Queens of Mystery, Acorn is a producer or co-producer. And so we think that will continue because they are targeting using data and analytics to target a very specific audience, as you would imagine they have immediate feedback on what show is what streams are most successful. What is interesting though, is that we are beginning for appropriate AMC Networks content to also give that a window on our targeted SVOD. So for example, Nosferatu, which we just renewed to season two and that is our Vampire story on AMC that will have its premiere SVOD window on Shutter for example, and you begin to see early seasons of the Braxton's from WE TV on UMC. And then I will also mentioned Greg Nick Otero, who is a producer on the Walking Dead. He is executive producer of a horror series called Creep Show, which will make its premiere on Shutter. So you begin to see us benefiting from a symbiotic relationship between the linear networks and the targeted SVOD as they continue to gain mass on the platforms.

And so just despite the fact that the new platforms are single revenue stream versus the dual that you have on your existing business, you still think that the margin profile could look similar because of the sort of content sharing benefit you figured or is it fundamentally different from a profitability perspective?

No I think everything you just said is close to the way we think about it.

Okay. Great, thank you for that.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Alexia Quadrani with JP Morgan.

Hi this is [indiscernible] for Alexia thanks for taking our question. And just going back to the SVOD services, how do you think about launching these services directly yourself versus partnering with the aggregation channel like Amazon or Apple which might serve as a larger funnel to acquire subscribers?

Sure. So yes this is Ed. So we think both are good. We are partnered on some of the larger platforms, but as Josh mentioned at this point the majority of our subscribers are direct-to-consumer both of our platform which we have been working to develop for a number of year. That gives us more immediate feedback, that gives us a much more data about who our subscribers are, what shows they are watching, what percentage of episodes they watch to completion, where they go after finishing one series, what series they go to next. You get that with D2C. We also have analytics against those subscribers that make it very, very efficient for us to keep subscribers. As Josh and Sean were alluding to a very, very critical component is managing new churn and so if you control the platform you just have a larger window to managing churn rate to subscriber preference and to reaching out with your marketing methods at maximum efficiency. Having said that Amazon is a good partner, Apple is a good partner, we think we will continue to be both on our own platform and on some of our partner platforms.

Thank you. That is great and as a follow-up on, I think recently announced in other show will be simulcast on ABC and Sundance, do you see more of that going forward obviously Killing Eve, saw a great success being simulcast two channels. How do you maintain the distinct brand of your channel at different time?

Yes the simulcast is not something we do a lot of, we are quite - creatively with Killing Eve and we thought it was the unique opportunity to give this show wider exposure, which seem to work and interestingly the ratings on BBC America held fast continue to be strong and we think new people on AMC were able to sample the show and tonight the show got Emmy recognition as well. So we will use it occasionally for big events such as the Planet Earth franchise, we have done a simulcast to a road block and in that way not only got more attention to what we think is extraordinary programming, but where our advertisers are concerned we are also able to give them more value in a world where people are looking for big events and special events and that is the thinking behind it.

Great. Thank you.

Thank you. We have a question from Todd Juenger from Sanford Bernstein.

Hi good morning. Thanks for taking the question. Can I talk a little bit with you guys if you don’t mind about the content licensing sort of line. And so Sean just quickly, I think in the past couple quarters, you had been saying that 15 or 19 would be higher than 2018 in growth rate. I think this morning you said it would be similar to 2018. So I don’t know of how big that change is, but just wonder what has changed and lead to that, if you could share that with us. And then broader maybe Sean or Josh, going forward with the SVOD services and talking about your own content playing a role on them, how do you reconcile that with your content licensing business revenue opportunities there, it seems like that is a trade off, you will have to contemplate, and even specifically how does that relate to the output deals that are in place and when you think about output deals going forward - the question is, how does that come together and does it change your philosophy on content licensing and partners overtime and the financial impact? Thanks.

Thanks Todd. Yes, on first one, you have got it right in terms of our outlook for the year on content licensing. Again, we continue to believe for 2019 it’s an area of growth. It's moderate a bit, a lot of that is related to timing, frankly. But as you know, that is not only the exploitation of the show on domestic and international SVOD. there is gaming, there is licensing and merchandising, there is home video, EST, et cetera. So there is a lot of components that we don't have, perfect visibility to. But, so some of those other areas have moderated a bit. But overall, it's really a timing on effects.

Todd on the subject of what we do with content. And I will ask Ed to chime in, if he has anything to add, if I may. The development of our SVOD services, which is now several years into activities, represents an opportunity for us. And I think you will understanding the trade-offs instantly, you have been a student of the subject. Our services as we described, are quite different in their cost composition. And then the general entertainment or whole house services that are now competing with one another for share and spending at very heavy levels, obviously. So what we will do is we will take a look at every show that we have, Frankly what is economics are, and what its applicability is. And we will factor that also increasingly into our development thinking as these services begin to scale. There are some projects, which will be naturally attractive to the services we have because of their nature, their editorial nature and also because of their costs. There will be other shows that I will call them bigger or if I may, much, much bigger. That we may find appropriate to simply exploit on a worldwide basis or an international basis with third-party services as we make a determination of where the greatest return is. So for us, there will not be a playbook, its hard and fast. It will be a developing playbook based upon the size, scale and net economics of our SVOD services. The nature of the content, where the greatest return is, and it will not be binary or the same plot show-after-show. I know there is much discussion in the more mainstream SVOD world about all of that, and rights coming back. We live and play in a different arena and we will follow a pattern that has sensible economics in each instance that balances strategic opportunity and grow against economics.

Okay. Thank you very much.

Operator. Let’s take the next question.

Thank you. Our next question comes from David Joyce from Evercore ISI.

Thank you. Just had little bit more questions on the Aurora addressable advertising efforts. I was just wondering is that starting to enter the discussions in the up fronts and has that impacted the pricing there. And to-date since you had some strong growth in that, is it bringing incremental advertisers into the environment, if you could just provide us some more color there? Thank you.

Hi David. Yes, I think very much Aurora is part of our upfront conversations and very much it helps with the pricing or the CPM part of that conversation. And I think really that has been at strength more than bringing new advertisers in, it’s bringing bigger commitments at higher pricing and so particularly in the auto category, in that movie studios category, in the pharmaceutical category we are seeing receptivity to the Aurora tool and its ability to create efficiencies for client marketers and to hyper target their prospects.

Alright. Thank you.

Operator at this point we would like to take one last question please.

Thank you sir. Our final question comes from Vasily Karasyov with Cannonball Research.

Alright good morning. I think my question is for Josh and Ed. Josh you touched on AVOD, so my question is I think it’s two parts maybe a little more. So first of all are you surprised by the growth in AVOD usage in the U.S. and I'm not only talking about who, I'm also talking about Pluto TV. I think Viacom has been disclosing a lot of growth metrics after they closed the acquisition, especially given the quality of content that was available on it before Viacom started putting on their content. So and what does it tell you about that being a competition for your linear networks and also what would you say to an argument that your DTC offerings internationally maybe there is an argument to be made back and ad supported tier at least is a way to get subscribers given how PayTV evolved internationally historically where people showed more propensity to watch commercials and free to ad television and PayTV ARPU was lower per capita given lower per capita GDP and income and so on? So would appreciate your thoughts on this guys.

Sure thanks for that. I think we are not surprised, we are participants in AVOD, we license our content to AVOD services, so we have been tracking them for some time and partnering with them for some time. And so we are active participants in AVOD services and understand what the trends have been. I think that it’s an attractive platform and attractive medium. So I wouldn’t say that we are surprised. I think on the question of their relationship to SVOD, we get into some interesting and rich territory because they have been, as you know at least in the U.S. discrete entities. Crackle was around for a while, it didn’t call itself AVOD, but it really was an AVOD service run by a movie studio, there was just a transaction surrounding that. So it has different people running it and, Pluto and [2B] (Ph) are around and others. And so they are interesting models to consider. And I don't know that the jury has determined what the final resolution to the optimal model will be, because Hulu is the one that perhaps emulates some music services where you pay for this and then you pay for it without commercials. That is sort of a variation that is particular to Hulu that has been relevance and successful. As you mentioned, the other AVOD services don't have a premium option in the in the video world. But we see premium options in some cases in the audio world that work quite well. Just to expand on this, perhaps more than you even want to hear is it's really curious to think about what occurs in the world of video, you know that there are video platforms that were inhabited with advertising like YouTube, that then launched commercial free variance and…

Thank you.

Alright. Well at this point, we would like to thank everyone for your interest in AMC Networks and for joining us on today's call. Operator, you can now conclude the call.

Thank you sir. That concludes the call. Everyone you may now disconnect.