Welcome to the Applied Materials fiscal 2008 fourth quarter and year-end earnings conference call. During the presentation all participants will be in a listen only mode. Afterwards you’ll be invited to participate in the question and answer session. As a reminder this conference is being recorded today, November 12, 2008. Please note that today’s call will contain forward-looking statements which are all statements other than those with historical fact including statements regarding the economic and industry outlook, customer spending and utilization rates and applied performance, strategic plans, cost reduction action and participated savings, products, competitive position, R&D, foreign strategy, cash generation and deployment, operational efficiencies and financial targets. All forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such statements. Information concerning these risk factors is contained in today’s earnings press release and in the company’s filings with the SEC. Forward-looking statements are based on information as of November 12, 2008 and the company assumes no obligation to update such statements. Today’s call also contains non-GAAP financial measures, reconciliations of the non-GAAP measures to GAAP measures are contained in today’s earnings release and in our financial highlight slides which are on the investor page of our website at www.appliedmaterials.com. I would now like to turn the conference over to John Nunziati Director of Investor Relations-Applied Materials. Please go ahead sir.

Good afternoon and welcome to the Applied Materials fiscal 2008 fourth quarter and year-end earnings call. I am stepping in as Robert [Freeze] is sick today with laryngitis. I would like to highlight that we will be hosting our 2009 analyst day on Wednesday, February 18th, in New York City. More details on this event will be provided soon, but please note it on your calendar. Joining me on the call today are Mike Splinter, President and CEO, George Davis, Chief Financial Officer and Joe Sweeney, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary. Today we will discuss our results for the period ending October 26, 2008. The financial results were released this afternoon at 1:05pm Pacific Time. A copy of the news release is available on business wire and on our website, www.appliedmaterials.com. Mike Splinter will lead off the call with commentary on the market environment and our strategies for 2009. George will follow with a discussion on our financial performance for the full year and the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 and then provide our target for the first fiscal quarter of 2009. After Mike and George’s remarks we will open the call for questions. With that I would like to turn the call over to Mike. Mike.

Let me begin by thanking our employees for their excellent work and meeting the challenges of a volatile quarter. Their accomplishments throughout the year position the company well in both our core business and new markets. The last six weeks of turmoil in the financial markets is unprecedented and the weakening global economy will have significant impact on all of Applied’s businesses. The market for semiconductors and flat panel displays depend largely on consumer demand and for growth. The current negative trend in consumer spending and economic uncertainty have led our customers to reassess their spending plans and we are seeing a pattern of multiple downward revisions as a severity of the situation sets in. Applied Materials is taken action based on our view that this will be an extended downturn lasting a year or longer. There will be significant changes in our semi-conductor customer base as the industry emerges. First, we intend to focus on executing our core strategies while improving efficiency and reducing spending. Second, we will invest aggressively in the technology, products and customer relationships that are essential for us to emerge in a stronger market position. Third, we will be disciplined, selective and patient in pursuing strategic acquisition opportunities and Fourth we have a strong balance sheet and we will remain focused on operational cash flow and asset management to preserve its strength and maintain our flexibility to support strategic business priorities. In silicon systems although visibility is extremely limited, the trends we are seeing today suggest that wafer fab equipment spending will be down more than 25% in 2009. In display we expect cap ex to be down more than 40% year-over-year. Almost daily we are hearing customer reports of factory slowdowns, closures and capacity reductions as they deal with the dramatic falloff and demand…

As this is our year-end call, I will cover results for both the fourth quarter and the full year. In Q4 Applied performed at the high end of our target range for orders and exceeded our revenue and EPS guidance. Orders of $2.2 billion were driven by growth in silicon systems and energy and environmental solutions, offset by an expected significant order decline in display and an 8% decline in Applied Global Services. Backlog increased to $4.85 billion, backlog adjustments were negative at $65 million and comprised $20 million of the bookings primarily related to cancellations and adjustments from non solar EES customers and $45 million of unfavorable currency adjustments. Revenue growth of 11% quarter-over-quarter was led by EES with strong sales and crystalline silicon solar. Earnings per share of $0.17 was up over 40% and reflected strong operating performance in our core businesses and cost management. Approximately $0.03 resulted in the gain on sale of our administrative office building in Singapore and certain other non-recurring items. In our segment results, silicon systems orders in Q4 increased 40% over Q3 in line with our call for our orders to be up more than 30%. Expected strength and logic was augmented by a few large orders from DRAM customers. This was a highly concentrated order quarter coming off a low base in Q3. Our order composition was DRAM 48%, logic and other 40%, foundries 9% and flash at 3%. While SSG net sales were essentially flat in Q3, operating income improved to just under 24% of net sales. In AGS, orders and revenue were impacted by a lower factory utilization in semi-conductor and display factories and dropped 8% and 13% respectively versus Q3. Sales of spares and refurbished systems were most heavily impacted in this environment. In display orders fell significantly…

Please note that during the Q&A we ask that you limit your request to one question and one follow up per firm. Let’s begin with the first question.

(Operator Instructions) Your first question comes from James Covello – Goldman Sachs. James Covello – Goldman Sachs: My first question would be on the DRAM segment and Mike you referenced in the beginning that you think coming out of the other side of this your customer base in semiconductors could look very different. Do you have any thoughts about how DRAM and particularly Taiwan DRAM comes out of the other side of this given the severity of this down turn and what your customer base could look like again, particularly in Taiwan DRAM on the other side of this cycle.

Well, I think it’s really a worldwide question Jim and in part in Taiwan it will depend a little bit on what the government does there but I think we see two fewer, maybe three fewer companies in this space at the end of the down turn. I think initially in this last year we expected consolidation, this kind of global recession is going to pretty much ensure it happens. James Covello – Goldman Sachs: Obviously customer consolidation isn’t usually great for suppliers, but what’s your take on that?

Well, it will I think make things more rational. You know what the pricing is like in the DRAM world over the last two years. I think if there’s fewer suppliers the market will be a little more orderly and I think that, in the long run is a positive. James Covello – Goldman Sachs: If I could get my follow up, it would be around the solar segment particularly with the SunFabs. What kinds of things do you think need improvement in order to get quicker customer sign off going forward? What kinds of things do you guys still believe you need to work on other than the tandem junction technology, maybe logistical support as you install the SunFabs or whatever other issues you guys still feel that you need to improve to get quicker sign up.

Signups doesn’t really have anything to do with tandem junction, the first number of factories are single junction factories. Just moving up the learning curve Jim. You start up factories, you learn an awful lot of detailed issues, every one of them has to be resolved but the good thing is we resolve them once, we learn, we move it to the next factory and each one will be faster and faster as we move through time.

Our next question comes from the line of Stephen Chin – UBS. Stephen Chin – UBS: Two questions on the solar profitability, I guess the first is do you think it’s reasonable to model improving operating margins in that solar division as we go through fiscal 2009? And, the second question to that is, is today’s restructuring program impact applied solar division and if so with the solar workforce reductions be similar to the rest of the company?

In terms of the operating profit, I think we saw this quarter that you had a fair amount of additional revenue coming in, in the area where we’re having the highest margins right now in the solar in the crystalline silicon group so that was a positive that we said will reverse itself in next quarter when we get to a more normalized revenue level. 2009 is still going to be a working out year for us because it’s when we’re going to be going through and experience essentially the full learning curve as we roll through the initial SunFab sign offs. So, I think we’ll just have to see for the full year where the crystalline silicon side comes out. We have strong backlog in that area and then depending on how well demand holds up in that regard. That will be a positive for profitability or if we see a big pull back that will have an impact negatively. Then in terms of the cost reduction programs, every one of our operating executives has a target. They’re working their programs right now. I’m not going to comment on the waiting. Obviously, certain areas have more end market demand issues to sort out than others but we’re confident that we can execute on this cost reduction program and we’ll have plans out this quarter.

Our next question comes from Patrick Ho – Stifel Nicolaus & Company, Inc. Patrick Ho – Stifel Nicolaus & Company, Inc.: In terms of your cash flow going forward you mentioned that you’re going to be focused on strategic investments. Just given where the stock price is at are you still not finding any I guess use for it in the near term in terms of the stock buy back?

Clearly we think there’s value in our stock and we have great confidence in our long term business plan. We just think that it’s prudent at this time to preserve the cash that we would spend in share repurchase to make sure that we have basically control of our own destiny. We have a very strong balance sheet coming in to this situation. We’re probably better positioned than we’ve ever been and we want to make sure that as we go through this thing until we really see how deep an how difficult it is to navigate this particular economy that we have the flexibility to maintain that we have going in. Patrick Ho – Stifel Nicolaus & Company, Inc.: In terms of your semicap orders, we have one logic customer that’s beginning its next generation ramp on the 32 nanometer node. Without I guess giving exact details of how they’re going to order, does that provide you any near term support over the next few quarters on that business front?

Well it does of course and you can understand if you kind of look at our picture that a big part of the overall orders and revenue are from the top four customers and really that was in part why our Q4 looked as good as it did.

Our next question comes from Weston Twigg – Pacific Crest Securities. Weston Twigg – Pacific Crest Securities:

Let me just clarify something, there hasn’t been equipment shipped to Best Solar. Now, Best Solar is building out their factories and that may be what you’re thinking about. Equipment that is shipped to our customers, and we shipped basically full shipped to seven customers and are in the process of shipping to eight, those are all secured by letters of credit, that customers are moving ahead. They had to have their financing in place to be at this stage so they’re moving ahead on schedule. Weston Twigg – Pacific Crest Securities: I guess just sort of following on, what if a customer is unable to complete a SunFab project? You say you have letters of credit but do you get a substantial portion up front as a down payment that might offset potential [inaudible]?

Yes, we are more than fully secured for everything that is shipped today so our basic structure for these, they’re working capital intensive as you know, is deposits up front and then prior to shipment to have everything fully secured. Weston Twigg – Pacific Crest Securities: Then just on the crystalline silicon solar side, last quarter you mentioned you were around a $200 million a quarter shipment run rate. It sounds like potentially weakening demand on the crystalline silicon side. What do you think might be a low point for the shipment rate through next year?

I’m not ready to make that call. We haven’t had cancellations as you saw from the debookings, you didn’t see anything there from the crystalline silicon side. What’s really been the phenomena is recently trying to catch up revenue with the shipment rates. That’s really where we are now, we’re caught up and so it will be, as we work through our backlog we’ve been running it at about the $200 million rate a quarter and until there’s cancellations that’s our assumption.

And remember, if people are going to bring on silicon capacity, they have to saw and shape the wafers and it has to be able to process them. I don’t think that says much about what the end demand is going to be like or when an adjustment would take place but I don’t think we’re in a position to make a solid forecast out a couple of quarters.

Our next question comes from Analyst for Jay Deahna – J.P. Morgan. Analyst for Jay Deahna – J.P. Morgan: Just two quick questions, first, how many SunFab lines did you book this quarter? And, how many do you expect next quarter? Then, I have a follow up.

We don’t forecast but we booked one SunFab line this quarter. Analyst for Jay Deahna – J.P. Morgan: And would you expect that or more next quarter?

We don’t forecast out on the SunFab orders. Analyst for Jay Deahna – J.P. Morgan: Then could we get some more specifics on your tandem junction [inaudible] line? Do you have working panels at 8% efficiency and when do you expect [inaudible]?

Well, do we internally to Applied Materials? Yes. But, we can’t comment on what a customer has working. But, we’re happy with where our technology is moving and how fast it’s moving ahead. The schedule for that factory sign off is in our second quarter. We think that’s very much on schedule and going to happen.

Our next question comes from the line of Kirsh Sankar – Banc of America Securities. Kirsh Sankar – Banc of America Securities: I had two questions, one is given the dislocations in the solar market can Applied capitalize on those and move downstream like leveraging [inaudible] and investing in other things? Or, is the plan in ’09 just to focus on executing on the equipment part of the business?

Our strategy first and foremost is to focus on our equipment and turnkey and technology business. We think this is the fastest way to scale solar energy around the world and drive the pricing down. Will we do some downstream demonstrations, those kinds of things? They’re for us, at this point, more marketing than business process to help create the demonstration that this is a business people can make money at and as cost effective to install and I think we’re demonstrating those things around the world. Kirsh Sankar – Banc of America Securities: In terms of your guidance for orders down over 30% can you just give us some granularity on the breakout between how low silicone could be?

We think it will be down significantly but we’re not going to break it out much more than that for the same reason we’re not giving order guidance. The ability to forecast at the start of a quarter when our own customers forecasts are dropping or is as volatile as we’re seeing them. We wanted to give you some indication directionally of where it looks overall, but I think we’re going to just leave it at that at this point. Kirsh Sankar – Banc of America Securities: Just a quick follow on, how many $100 million plus orders did you have in the October quarter?

Let me just put it to you this way, we had four orders, four customers I should say that comprised 70% of the total orders that we had in silicone. That was the big piece. We had a SunFab order that was also larger than $100 million. I think that should give you an idea of the concentration.

Our next question comes from Timothy Arcuri – Citigroup. Timothy Arcuri – Citigroup: Two things, first of all it looks like pricing for crystalline modules was thought to come down about 20% next year but really it looks like it’s going to be about 20% just in Q1. So, I’m wondering the pricing rabbit and the cost rabbit that you thought you were chasing, i.e. where you thought pricing would be for crystalline modules out two or so years from today, does that rapid rate of pricing decline change how you think about solar and how you might have to get more aggressive in terms of cutting price to get cap ex per watt down?

Actually no. You know, crystalline silicon pricing has been very stable for a long time. Any approach, any modeling that we’ve done in this business, we’ve always thought that pricing had to come down 20% a year on average to really start getting this technology in to the space where it can eventually be competitive with other forms of electricity generation. So, the fact that because of silicon shortage, pricing has been stable for multiple years really doesn’t change how strategically we think about this business or the targets that we’ve set internally for ourselves. We know where we have to get to. The target is other forms of electricity generation, it’s not some internal solar target necessarily. As far as pricing, we know we have to keep driving the technology to get more efficient, more productive and that’s where we’re going to keep the market growing. Timothy Arcuri – Citigroup: I guess as a quick follow up, I’ve actually asked you this before but, given the current credit issues, does it make you rethink your business model in solar at all potentially going more vertical and not relying on customers that are in turn so reliant on financing?

Well, it’s hard for us to think about crossing the line of competing with customers. If that’s what you’re inferring Tim. I think there’s lots of opportunity in the solar market in various bases to help increase demand but I think for right now we want to stay focused. If we really see the business change maybe we’d reevaluate but I think we still see enough interest in our products and turnkey factories that we’re going to do quite well in this market over time.

Also, at the end of the day Tim, it’s not our balance sheet that would drive the value equation there. It’s ultimately what’s the end market demand and do you have the utilities coming in, do you have the broader government subsidies. These are very financeable arrangements if the demand is right and if the demand isn’t right there’s no amount of balance sheet that’s going to solve that problem.

Our next question comes from Satya Kumar – Credit Suisse. Satya Kumar – Credit Suisse: George and Mike, I’m a little surprised that you saw significant increase in Taiwan DRAM orders. I was wondering if you could give me some color on whether these orders are for technology buys or capacity, some kind of trends to stack conversions or just stack capacity? Are you looking to ship these products in the next one or two quarters or do the ship dates extend beyond the next couple of quarters?

Well, there’s a complex question but, yes it’s for both technology and capacity in Taiwan. Some of the orders are for conversion so kind of the answer to your question is all of the above.

As I said, these were very concentrated orders and as I said 70% came from four customers but 30% of the total order book that we got for Q4 in silicon turned in the quarter and another 25% of it is going to turn in the next quarter so we’ve got a big piece of the flow through just in basically the first quarter of ’09 and then some will stretch on out to the later part of the year.

But our aging and our backlog is not particularly moving. Satya Kumar – Credit Suisse: Mike, I think earlier on your prepared comments you made a comment that you’re suspending the buyback and you might look to be more aggressive on the acquisition front? I was wondering if you could add a little bit more color to that? Are you primarily looking in the silicon part or are you looking to make more acquisitions in the EES as you look to grow the business longer term?

I’ll comment on the acquisition and let George comment on the buyback. Actually, what I said was we’re going to be disciplined and patient about acquisitions. I’m quite happy with the capability we’ve developed in the company to do acquisitions and I think we want to be very selective. I think we’re going to say no many more times than we’ll say yes. We think that there’s going to be lots of opportunity for acquisitions but what we’re going to try to do is be very strategic in both our semiconductor space and our solar space to see where there’s technology or products that will add to our offering and really make a strategic difference to the company. As you know, doing an acquisition takes a lot of management bandwidth. We want to make sure the ones that we do are really going to have impact. I wouldn’t say that we’re going to be overly selective on one business unit or another. We’re going to weight it on strategic impact to the company.

On share repurchase I’ll just reiterate the fact that as you know we have been a strong proponent of share repurchases as a way of returning excess cash to shareholders so no change in that philosophical bias. Also, no change in our view that we’re a very attractive long term investment and certainly at the kind of levels today you just feel very comfortable. The fact is we want to use the balance sheet and maintain a very strong balance sheet to make sure that as we emerge from this that we are as strong as we can be in terms of the technology that we’ve maintained or acquired, in terms of the investments that we’ve made through this difficult period and we think prudence on preserving cash at this time, particularly since it’s really not known how deep this economic set back can go. We think it makes more sense to be prudent and hold off until that sorts itself out.

Our next question comes from C. J. Muse – Barclays Capital. C. J. Muse – Barclays Capital: I guess first question, on the solar front how should we think about the revenue mix between crystalline and silicon and thin film as we progress throughout calendar year ’09?

Today crystalline silicon dominates the revenue picture in EES and it should even out by the end of the year, be more of an even mix. Again, I think that’s assuming that things play out the way we see them today. Forecasting has been a very difficult process in this environment but that’s how we see it today. C. J. Muse – Barclays Capital: Then I guess second follow up questions there, when you look at 2009 and clearly it looks like solar is possibly the only growth area within your different segments, and that becoming more important in terms of an earnings driver and without the benefit of this $100 million deferred revenue that was supported this quarter. When should we see that segment reach profitability?

I think honestly we have to take a look at how customers react to this environment to answer that question. I mean we believed last time we updated on this that 2009 would be the year that we would be GAAP breakeven. Just to remind you we carried in ’08 $120 million of acquisition charges in the EES segment so there’s a big nut there that has to be worked through on a GAAP basis. On an operating basis performance has been obviously substantially better than what you see in the reported segment. So, we’ll have to see really how the demand situation plays out whether that forecast is still valid and we certainly will have a complete update and view on that at the analyst meeting scheduled for New York. But, we’ll also have more information obviously as we get in to the end of next quarter. C. J. Muse – Barclays Capital: Is there a certain revenue level that would drive breakeven that you could share with us?

No, I think what you’re seeing today with the mix that they have today, that kind of revenue level they were clearly breakeven. But, again I think it will depend on mix and we’ll just have to see. But, we feel very good about the long term business model for the solar group. Inherently the products are profitable and the SunFab model we think is an excellent one and once we get through the basic learning costs should generate the kind of operating margins that we forecasted for 2010 and beyond. C. J. Muse – Barclays Capital: Your next question comes from the line of Bill Ong – American Technology Research. Bill Ong – American Technology Research: Based on your conversations with your chip customers, do you have an industry forecast of what global chip revenue should be next year? Flat, down, someway of quantifying it? Then more importantly do you have a sense of what the base line type of spending is needed just to keep the global fabs running?

Bill, you’re asking for our forecast on chip sales? Bill Ong – American Technology Research: If you understand the chip revenue and then you sort of get a sense of capital intensity for a way of figuring out what type of spending is needed.

We think that in 2009 chip sales will be down some place 5% to 10%. That’s kind of our view at this point. Obviously, I’d say our visibility on that is pretty low but that’s our view at the current time. When there’s less sales in the chip world there’s little need for added capacity. Bill Ong – American Technology Research: Do you think the capital intensity will probably still be at the 16% to 18% of revenue?

I don’t even know how to forecast that when units are down.

Plus, capacity utilization is down so much.

Our next question comes from Jesse Pichel – Piper Jaffray. Jesse Pichel – Piper Jaffray: Are you starting to see some production of single junction panels from some customers and I’m wondering what type of cost per watt these customers are seeing relative to the cost road map you communicated the analyst community?

In the initial phases here we’re seeing roughly $1.50 a watt. This is very early as these panels start getting in to higher volumes and the factories run more efficiently we’ll see that continue to come down. We’re pretty happy with where we are, we’re pretty much on track with where we thought we would be. Jesse Pichel – Piper Jaffray: As a follow up, another solar equipment company demonstrated that a good chunk of its solar backlog is backed up with revocable LCs and cash deposits and I think the number was about 50% of their backlog and this is GT Solar I’m talking about. I’m wondering is there any kind of metric that you can share with us of how your solar backlog is protected there with LCs or deposits?

We have, as we talked about for SunFab, we have a policy of being fully covered as we ship in and all of our eight factories where we’ve shipped equipment so far were fully secured for all of the equipment and the sign off value for the factories. Then it’s been a practice on the crystalline silicon side to take deposits and to secure credit where credit is necessary, customers commitments.

Our next question comes from the line of Atif Malik – Morgan Stanley. Atif Malik – Morgan Stanley: If I look at your orders over the two quarter period, your orders on an absolute basis are actually in line with your peers so is it fair to assume that your quarter was a backend loaded for silicon?

I think that’s fair because I think we would expect some of our competitors to have seen some of these orders in there next quarter they report. Atif Malik – Morgan Stanley: George, can you comment on the linearity of the operating expense cut over the year, how should we think about modeling it?

We’re going to try and obviously address the headcount reductions as expeditiously as possible and other spending reductions but we don’t have it scaled out obviously. But, I would think in the first half of the year we would try and get at least half way out the gate and we’ll see.

Your next question comes from Gary Hsueh – Oppenheimer & Co. Gary Hsueh – Oppenheimer & Co.: Mike, just your kind of general comment about thin film continuing their projects as planned despite some financing delays. That’s kind of tough to believe given where oil is right now and given the difficulties with kind of bigger mainstream companies getting financing. Are you really referring just to the near term and kind of your basket of five to seven customers? Or, are you indeed really talking about the entire industry as a whole?

Let me clarify there, what I said was for those customers that we’ve already shipped equipment to, we see those projects staying on schedule. For those that are still working through their financing I said that I thought there would be some delay as they both have financing issues and maybe they have other project issues but I tend to focus right now on more of the financial situation. But, remember also that the feed in tariffs in Europe have not subsided and they’ll be increasing tariffs in Japan. We have obviously a new incentive tax credit in the US. We have a new administration in the US. China will do something on renewable energy in their infrastructure package so how all these things play out over the next year exactly I’m not sure but I don’t expect that oil prices specifically are going to have a whole lot of affect on solar energy. Very little electricity is generated by oil, most is generated by coal and natural gas. But, it doesn’t matter, in the end we’ve got to keep driving the cost down and get the cost competitive with all forms of electricity. That’s in the end the goal. Gary Hsueh – Oppenheimer & Co.: One question here for George real quick, George I really don’t understand the hesitancy in reiterating your profitability guidance for solar next year and basically also the sort of secrecy surrounding what your breakeven is. You look right now and obviously you’re trying to guide us to not model a breakeven at roughly around $450 million but given obviously a 50/50 mix that you really kind of talked about in ’09 and kind of rolling off this benefit I guess off of slightly higher margins off that $100 million in deferred revenue recognition, I mean what is the kind of ballpark number we should be looking at, at more a 50/50 crystalline silicon mix? Is it $500, $600, $700, just give us some help there?

Clearly, you saw a breakeven this quarter. First off, I think we’ve been exceedingly transparent in our discussion on this and so my view is forecasting the profitability for 2009 when there’s a key dependency on crystalline silicon when we’re not prepared to forecast crystalline silicon for the full year, is just premature. So, we’ll keep you posted, we know it’s an important issue. Again, we’re very interested in reaching profitability as rapid as possible and we’re taking whatever steps necessary to get there. We’ll keep you posted, it’s really more of a hesitancy to try and forecast a full year of crystalline silicon. Gary Hsueh – Oppenheimer & Co.: Just a quick follow up, I can understand the hesitancy and visibility, I mean Intel just basically cut their guidance one more time here. But, if I strip out that $100 million in deferred revenue out of EES in the October quarter, what would have been the profitability there?

It would not have been profitable.

Our next question comes from Mehdi Hosseini – Freidman, Billings, Ramsey & Co. Mehdi Hosseini – Freidman, Billings, Ramsey & Co.: This morning one of these cell manufacturers talking about shutting down 40% of their lines, I expect some of the other public silicon crystalline based manufacturers to also start shutting down lines. Is that already been factored in to your comment that crystalline and thin film bookings are going to even out by sometime next year.

I don’t know whether we’ve incorporated something that happened this morning but we certainly incorporated everything that we know from the customers that we have and what they’ve order from us at the current time.

Right. It’s really more a reflection of current backlog and the fact that we didn’t have any customer cancellations in Q4. The mix of that can change as our forecast could change based on things that we learn over the next several months. Mehdi Hosseini – Freidman, Billings, Ramsey & Co.: I guess the better question is, is booking for silicon solar business declining or would you expect it to go up?

We expect bookings for silicon systems to go down in Q1, clearly.

He’s asking about crystalline [inaudible].

On the bookings side I’m not going to guide to the individual areas at this point. Mehdi Hosseini – Freidman, Billings, Ramsey & Co.: Then when I look at your guidance for the [inaudible] as you’re up to $0.04 and the kind of revenue range that you’re guiding to kind of gives you a sense of what the EPS breakeven is. I do understand you don’t want to provide any guidance on the breakeven point but for the purpose of modeling as we try to factor in the 12% workforce reduction, how should we think about the drop through or incremental change in op ex?

Sure, no. The other question was about breakeven for EES segment. We are happy to talk about breakeven for Applied Materials overall. I mean, you can see from our guidance today that if you look at the low end of our EPS guidance range and you match that up with the low level of our revenue range, that gets you a breakeven level of around $1.3 billion a quarter. We think by the time we fully implement the cost savings programs you can reduce that breakeven by another $150 million to $200 million.

Our next question comes from Mahesh Sanganeria – RBC Capital Markets. Mahesh Sanganeria – RBC Capital Markets: I have a question on silicon systems, did your revenue guidance imply that silicon systems will be down close to 50% and that puts you in the $400 kind of revenue range. It’s not an exact science but your silicon system backlog for me is coming out somewhere between $1.8 billion and $1.9 billion.

Let me just correct you on that, we were specific and said that we thought it could be down more than 25%. We did not use a 50% number. I’m not sure where you got that number. Mahesh Sanganeria – RBC Capital Markets: But, still your backlog for silicon system will still be much higher than what your peers have reported. Most of the companies have reported that their backlogs are running that level of their revenues. Yours is still a nice multiple of your revenue run rate.

Yes, I think number one you have to take a look at the fact that we had a very strong order quarter this quarter that they have not yet experienced or put in to their backlog and I think that’s probably what would account for virtually all of the difference of what you’re seeing. Mahesh Sanganeria – RBC Capital Markets: So you think that you got some new orders which will probably book in the December quarter for other companies?

No, our backlog reflects a strong Q4 ’08 and I would say that we have an extra month relative to many of our competitors and these were backend loaded orders in some cases. Mahesh Sanganeria – RBC Capital Markets: Yes, but that’s what I’m saying is that would imply that your peers will have that booking so their backlog should increase in December quarter for them but nobody has guided their ’09.

Yes.

We don’t want to speak for our competitors.

You can talk to them.

Operator, we’ll take one more question and then make our closing remarks.

Your final question comes from Raj Seth – Cowan & Company. Raj Seth – Cowan & Company: George, forgive me if I missed this earlier but next quarter sequentially what does op ex do or can you talk about gross margin and we can figure out the other one obviously.

I’m not going to guide to gross margin. Obviously we’re taking actions to keep our operating costs as low as possible so we would see them coming down and continuing to come down as we roll through the cost savings. Raj Seth – Cowan & Company: One, if I might for Mike. Mike, given the magnitude of what’s going on do you see any of your customers, at least those you expect to survive, are they changing their pace of technology transitions in a significant way or are we still following [Moore’s] law here?

I think that especially in a down turn people are going to actually focus on moving to the next generation of technology faster to get products that will maybe attract more buyers. They’re going to work hard to get to that next generation of technology so I think we’re going to see [Moore’s] law continue. Maybe a slightly slower pace but nothing significant here at this current time. Everybody is going to use this time to move ahead and find new products to sell. Raj Seth – Cowan & Company: Just a follow up to one of the earlier ones, somebody asked about capital intensity, you said last quarter in a normalized environment, clearly that’s not what we’re in, that you expected capital intensity to return to 20%ish. A couple of your peers have suggested a lower number. Any change to that 20% number that you gave last quarter?

Well, I think when we come out of this on the other side, if there are fewer customers the factor efficiency and the capital intensity will be down a few points. But, I think the industry will be in better shape because of it. So, I think we have to see what happens during this period before we solidify any prediction but in general that’s what I’m thinking.

We’d like to thank you for joining us in the discussion of the financial results. We’d like to remind you that a replay of this call and the supporting slide package will be available on the website starting at 5pm today and will remain posted until November 26th. Thank you for your interest in Applied Materials.

This concludes today’s conference call. You may now disconnect.