Good morning and welcome to the Alkermes plc Third Quarter 2015 Financial Results Conference Call. My name is Brandon [ph] and I'll be your operator for today. [Operator Instructions] And at this time I will now turn the call over to Sandra Coombs, Associate Director of Corporate Communications at Alkermes. You may begin.

Good morning. Welcome to the Alkermes plc conference call to discuss our financial results for the quarter ended September 30, 2015. With me today are Richard Pops our CEO, Shane Cooke our President, and Jim Frates our CFO. Before we begin, I encourage everyone to go to Alkermes.com to find our press release and related financial tables, including a reconciliation of the GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures that we'll discuss today, which we believe better represents the ongoing economics of our business. Our discussions during the call will include forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those forward-looking statements. Please see our press release and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q issued today and our most recent annual report on Form 10-K for important risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update or revise the information provided on this call as a result of new information or future results or developments. Today, Jim Frates will discuss our financial results and Richard Pops will provide an update on the Company. After we will open the call for Q&A. Now I will turn the call over to Jim.

Thanks, Sandy. Good morning everyone. We're pleased to report our results for the third quarter of 2015, which were characterized by solid revenues from our portfolio of commercial products and investments in our late-stage pipeline, as well as the final preparations for the launch of Aristada, our new long-acting injectable anti-psychotic for the treatment of schizophrenia, which is approved by the FDA on October 5th. In the third quarter we generated $152.7 million of total revenues and recorded $26.2 million of non-GAAP net loss. Worldwide end-market net sales of Risperdal Consta, Invega Sustenna and Invega Trinza, which are sold by Janssen Pharmaceuticals and use Alkermes technology, were approximately $694 million in the quarter, compared to $687 million for the same period last year. Taken together, these products experienced underlying operational growth of 10%, which was offset by the unfavorable impact of currency fluctuations. In the U.S., Invega Sustenna sales showed impressive growth as a leading product in the class with end-market sales of $277 million during the quarter, reflecting approximately 29% growth year over year. For the quarter, Alkermes recorded total manufacturing and royalty revenues of $67.6 million related to Risperdal Consta, Invega Sustenna and Invega Trinza. For Ampyra and Fampyra, our manufacturing royalty revenues were $22.1 million for the quarter, compared to $16.5 million for the same period last year. And for Bydureon, our royalty revenues were $13 million, compared to $10.3 million for the same period last year. Vivitrol had another strong quarter, with net sales of $37.9 million, compared to $25.8 million for the same period last year, demonstrating net sales growth of 47%. We're excited and encouraged by the increasing awareness and incorporate of Vivitrol into the treatment paradigm and a broad range of treatment settings, including criminal justice and drug court programs. This important initiatives…

That's great. Thank you, Jim. Good morning everyone. So we have a lot to cover this morning. The past few months have been jam-packed with important events, highlighted by the approval and launch of Aristada, the strong progress in the ALKS 5461 pivotal studies, and FDA meetings for both 3831 and ALKS 8700, which clarified advantageous registration pathways for these two important medicines. The pipeline is really coming together and critical elements have been substantially de-risked. As we approach the end of the year, we're on track for accomplishing what we set out to do in 2015. At the highest level, this means advancing multiple product development programs to the point where it's apparent that Alkermes controls one of the most important pipelines of new medicines in the industry, medicines designed to address serious patient needs in large chronic CNS disease areas. This is an unusual position and one we think is well-suited to the current environment where there's serious public skepticism about the real value of medicines and the role of bio-pharmaceutical companies play in improving human health. We are developing product candidates addressing specific patient-driven needs in large chronic diseases of the CNS and testing these medicines often head to head against existing state-of-the-art treatments. We are designing them to improve upon what precedes them. The number of people affected by these conditions is so large and the associated costs so significant, that if we're successful, we have the opportunity to price our medicines responsibly so that the whole ecosystem has the potential to benefit. As we close out 2015 and enter 2016, just look at what's happening. We plan to start ramping up the registration programs for ALKS 3831 in schizophrenia and ALKS 8700 in MS, and complete and obtain the results from our core efficacy studies…

Thanks, Richard. Brandon [ph], we'll now open the call up for questions.

Thank you. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] And from Barclays, we have Jon Eckard online. Please go ahead.

Jon, are you there?

Jon Eckard, your line is open.

We think we'll come back to Jon, Brandon [ph].

We'll take the next question. From JPMorgan, we have Cory Kasimov online. Please go ahead.

Hey, thanks. Good morning guys. Thank you for taking the questions. I have one for you on Aristada and then another on 8700. So I guess first on Aristada, I realize this is very early, but I'm interested from a prescriber standpoint, on the early receptivity your sales force has seen to another LAI [ph] in the market. So, now that you're out there with your own product, do you notice the disconnect that we've been talking about in terms of interest in this class compared with the relatively modest share that it has?

Yeah, Cory. It's really exciting for this team to be out in the field now with a product approval and a label and we can really go talk to these docs. As we've referred to in earlier remarks, I think that at launch we're really going first to the doctors who have some background in prescribing LAIs [ph], rather than trying to educate a whole new cadre of docs at launch, go where the business is and where the prepared mines are already. With that said, the differentiating features of Aristada are almost self-evident and they're captured in the label as well. So we're really excited to be calling on these docs.

Okay. And then the next question, as it relates to 8700, is, you know, were you expecting the FDA to require a phase 3 efficacy study? And then from the safety side of things, did PML come up as a topic of interest in these discussions?

The answer to the second question is no. I mean I think that that -- PML as a feature of these immunomodulators is something that everybody will always pay attention to clinically. We were, and you followed us all along with 8700, we were very, very agnostic about what the phase 3 program would look like, and really looked to FDA for guidance on what to do. And that spanned the idea of going all the way to two-year efficacy studies, looking at relapse rates and radiological endpoints to this kind of PK bridging approach. So we were thrilled that the more accelerated or streamlined pathway is what FDA recommended.

Okay. Thanks, Rich. I'll hop back in the queue.

Thank you, Cory.

And from Barclays, we have Jon Eckard online. Please go ahead, sir.

Hi, good morning. Can you guys hear me?

Now we can hear you, Jon.

Great. Thanks. So, just quickly on the timing on 5461, I think in prior quarters you had suggested the data could come as early as late 2015. When looking at the clinical trials, I know the trial FORWARD-4, completed enrollment early September. Is that something where we could still see a yearend surprise or do you see think, based on what you know now, that first quarter is really the time we're going to get it?

Well, I'll tell you what we told the teams, which is, it's consistent with the theme of this whole program, which is we will trade quality for time every time. So the team is operating under the mandate of when the data are ready, that's when it will be done. So that's why, in putting together for this call, we said, let's just say early Q1 2016, and it'll settle out where it settles out, and it'll be ready when the clinic [ph] collaborations team is ready to tell us it's ready.

Perfect. And then the human abuse liability study, that was also I think guided for before yearend. Is that still on track to -- for us to get results from that?

With the same caveat I just gave, yes. Yeah.

Okay.

We do believe we're on track for data on that this year.

Perfect. And then the last question before I jump back, is that, now you're going to have 8700, 5461, 3831, there's some overlap like 3831 and Aristada for example, maybe. But when it comes to strategic thoughts going forward about how to best monetize these assets, I mean are you guys currently thinking that these -- you're going to keep all these and become like a Pfizer, or are you thinking about partnering -- how could you think about strategically positioning your pipeline going forward?

I think putting together commercial operation to commercialize our assets in mental health is very straightforward in the U.S., and that's the base plan, is to build that out. And there is no other company that controls a pipeline with this much explosive potential and medical benefit that's wholly owned. So we really like that position we're in right now. So I think unless we see business opportunities that get these benefits to more patients faster, that drive the value for our shareholders, we're going to carry on.

Right. Thanks so much. I'll get back in the queue.

Thank you, Jon.

From Leerink, we have Paul Matteis online. Please go ahead.

Great. Thanks very much. I have a few questions on 3831 and 7119. First, on 3831. Can you talk about two things? One, how you will handle elanzapine experience in the patients you enroll in the phase 3? And secondarily, any restrictions that are imposed in physician's ability to treat symptomatically weight gain or metabolic side effects in the program?

Hey, Paul, welcome aboard. The 3831 program, if you look at what we did in the large randomized phase 2 study, we exclude patients from that study who would have had weight gain on elanzapine in recent memory. I don't think that they were completely excluded from ever having been on elanzapine. Jim, I'll look -- but there's a fairly protracted period where they shouldn't have been on elanzapine. And the whole idea is not to, in the context of the study, to try to use metformin or other therapeutic or pharmacologic approaches to attenuate weight. There's a straight-up comparison of the weight gain propensity of 3831 versus elanzapine in a randomized, controlled fashion.

Okay. Got it. And then on 7119, can you talk about the age of the patients you're going to enroll in the phase 1, knowing that different products like benzodiazepines or anything else that can affect sedation or agitation in Alzheimer's can have really different PK/PD in elderly patients versus young, healthy individuals? Thanks.

It's a great question. And obviously, elderly is a critical focus for this program over time. We'll start in the responsible way which is single ascending doses in healthy volunteers, adult volunteers. We're not quite sure of the age restriction but it won't be shunted towards the elderly. In so doing though, we're looking at this really interesting battery of psychometric assays to give us some sense, we hope, of properties like sedation or agitation, things like that, in healthy volunteers. And then we'll move quickly to integrate elderly patients in our dose-ranging studies in phase 2.

Okay, got it. And maybe if you don't mind, I might just ask one quick one in Aristada. I know for competitive reasons you're not going to expound upon your strategy for obtaining formulary access, which is understandable. But what do you see as a realistic goal for formulary access? And I guess, having the same level of access as something like Abilify maintained and what that's attained right now?

Yeah, that would be the goal. I think that we expect to have parity. And in this business, it just takes a matter of time to achieve it. But early returns are quite favorable. These are patients with serious diseases [inaudible] fairly, physicians need choices, we have a differentiated product, and it's one of the six protected classes under the BACA. So I think it's just more goal of ours of just as expeditiously as possible to get to a level where we and J&J and Otsuka have similar formulary placement.

Okay, great. Thanks very much.

Thank you.

From Credit Suisse, we have Vamil Divan online. Please go ahead.

Yeah, thanks so much for taking the questions. Sorry, I jumped off for a second earlier, so I apologize if any of this is covered. But just one on 8700 and one on 3831. So, on 8700, I would just appreciate the update you gave on the clinical side. Can you talk a little bit more on the IP side of things there? We get some questions from time to time in terms of how are you feeling in terms of the protection there. And then on 3831, again apologies if you've mentioned this, but in terms of the endpoints, I think you mentioned for the phase 3 you'll be focused on weight gain. Will there be specifics or metabolic endpoints? And I guess, how do you think about the ability ultimately based on the way you're designing your program, to be able to talk on the metabolic endpoints beyond just the weight impacts that you saw? Thanks.

Good morning, Vamil. Yeah, those are two good questions. On the IP side on 8700, it's really important to understand that we have a new chemical entity and that's a separate patent at NCE [ph]. So this is a new molecule that never existed before that metabolizes reliably into MMF, and provides therapeutic MMF concentrations over time after oral administration. So it's really -- it's got its own IP foundation and that's been validated by the issuance of the patent. And we'll defend it and advance that throughout the context of the program. 3831, the question is a good one, that in many ways the end-result of the metabolic changes that are induced by 3831 need to be manifested in weight. So the weight changes are the ones that are most important. Having said that, we actually expect within the umbrella of time provided by that phase 3 program, to run some smaller, free-standing studies to look at the metabolic effects of 3831. That by the way is being augmented as we speak by really exciting preclinical work that's going on here, trying to further de-convolute the mechanism of action of 3831 and attenuating weight gain induced by elanzapine. So we think it's a fertile area for science, and the clinical endpoint is focused on the most important clinical endpoint as opposed to an esoteric metabolic change, what's the gross manifestation in terms of weight, but we intend to irrigate that during the course of the phase 3 program.

Okay, thanks.

You're welcome.

From Goldman Sachs, we have Terence Flynn online. Please go ahead.

Hi. Thanks for the taking the question. Maybe just two quick ones for me on 8700 also. Just wondering if you can tell us what the primary endpoint will be of the 600-patient safety study, and then if -- it also said in the release that you guys are going to have to conduct additional preclinical studies to further support PK comparability to Tecfidera. Can you just give us any insight there? Thank you.

Sure. Good morning, Terence. The safety study is literally just a safety study. So we have -- we want to enroll a certain number of patients and have exposures for six months, a year, and beyond, and just make sure there's no differential safety effects, which we don't expect, because we expect to be similar to Tecfidera in that regard. The difference is we expect to exploit in the head-to-head comparison on GI tolerability. The preclinical studies, I'm sorry, I forgot the question, Jim.

What [inaudible] additional preclinical --

Oh, I'm sorry. It's on the PK bridging stuff. Yeah. There's just -- there's kind of a formal number of studies and elements of the submission for the PK bridge. So for example you do fed fast [ph], you do other things like that. But the key question that we wanted to ask was in this first study, to look at the basic AC [ph] PK comparison, which we were quite confident that we can make that PK bridge. So we'll fill in around that with the studies that are required for the NDA, but we don't expect a lot of scientific drama.

Thanks.

You're welcome.

[Operator Instructions]

Okay, we'll give it a sec. If not, we'll [inaudible].

And we have a follow-up from Paul Matteis with Leerink. Please go ahead.

Great. Thanks. One more quick one. Can you talk about the dose that you're moving forward for 8700 and what you saw with GI tolerability rates compared to Tecfidera? And I guess if the actual -- if the rates were comparable for what you pull -- what you reported for all doses in the prior phase 1 study. Thanks.

Hey, Paul. No, we won't disclose the dose rate now. We will as we start the program. You've seen previous data on 8700 and its GI tolerability. I'll just say that, across all the studies that we've done, and we've just seen a very, very low level of GI issues with 8700. So we'll go ahead and move into the definitive comparative study now, because I think we're all reluctant to make cross-study comparisons or comparisons to important drug like Tecfidera on limited data sets. But we feel like inherently we have a very well-tolerated medicine, and we're going to test that head to head, which is a very Alkermes thing to do, right? Like we go up against elanzapine, we go up against SSRIs. We like to know the answer because we know patients and payors like to know the answer too.

Yeah, fair enough. You've said in the press release that you're going to present the data at a medical meeting. Can you give any timing on that?

Not yet. We'll update you when we know.

Okay. Great. Thanks, Rich.

All right. Thanks everyone for joining us on the call this morning. If you have any additional questions, please don't hesitate to reach out to us at the Company. Thank you.