Good day. And welcome to Alcon’s Second Quarter 2020 Earnings Conference Call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions] After today’s presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. Please note, this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Karen King, SVP of Corporate Affairs. Please go ahead.

Welcome to Alcon’s second quarter earnings conference call. Earlier, we issued a press release and interim financial report, and posted a supplemental slide presentation to our website to enhance today's call. You can find all of these documents in the Investor Relations section of our website at www.investor.alcon.com. Joining me on today's call are David Endicott, our Chief Executive Officer; and Tim Stonesifer, our Chief Financial Officer. Our press release, presentation and discussion will include forward-looking statements. We expressly disclaim any obligation to update forward-looking statements as a result of new information or future developments except as required by law. Our actual results may vary materially from those expressed or implied in our forward-looking statements. Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those in our forward-looking statements are included in Alcon’s Form 20-F, our Form 6-K furnished on May 12, 2020 and our earnings, press release and interim financial report on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission and available on the SEC website at www.sec.gov. Non-IFRS financial measures used by the Company may be calculated differently from and therefore may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies. These non-IFRS financial measures should be considered along with, but not as alternatives to the operating performance measures as prescribed per IFRS. Please review the financial tables provided in the press release and our filings that reconcile non-IFRS measures to directly comparable measures presented in accordance with IFRS. For discussion purposes, our comments on growth are expressed in constant currency. And with that, I’ll now turn the call over to David.

Good morning and good afternoon, everyone. I want to start out by acknowledging and expressing our gratitude to the healthcare professionals and essential workers who continue to serve patients every day. From the start, we’ve said that the health and safety of our associates, doctors, patients and our communities is top priority. As such, we continue to invest resources to safeguard their welfare. I also want to specifically thank all of Alcon’s essential associates who work tirelessly to ensure that we can supply our customers with the products they need, as their businesses recover from this pandemic. For today's call, I'll start by providing a performance update and then comment on overall market dynamics and our innovation agenda. Tim will discuss our second quarter sales by business, financial performance, and provide more color on our outlook for recovery. Then, I'll wrap up with my closing comments and open up the call for Q&A. The second quarter will no doubt go down as one of the most challenging quarters in our history with conditions that demanded extraordinary focus on carefully managing our business. Despite the uncertainty created by COVID-19, we're encouraged that we're tracking to the recovery that we outlined in our last earnings call. First, we said that we believed April would be the low point for the quarter with modest improvement in May and June. April sales did mark the low point of the quarter. Sales were down close to 50% with May slightly better. As ophthalmologists return to the OR and optometrists opened their doors for business, June sales saw a significant improvement, and we saw continued growth in the month of July. Second, we said that we were taking a variety of short-term actions to help offset some of the income lost to sales pressure. And these…

Thank you, David. Results this quarter demonstrate strong execution, despite the COVID uncertainty. We continue to implement measures to protect our associates, support our customers and further strengthen our liquidity. We exercised heightened financial discipline and discretionary spending, production planning and managing our investment priorities. Starting with the top line, we saw 34% decline to $1.2 billion in the second quarter with double digit declines in both Surgical and Vision Care, as we'd anticipated. On a year-to-date basis, we saw a 15% decline. Surgical sales were down 42%, reflecting the slowdown of surgical procedures globally. On a year-to-date basis, surgical sales were down 21%. Implantable sales were $176 million, down 40% versus the prior year. Sales were down in monofocals, despite an increase in share during the quarter. This was partially offset by PC-IOL growth due to the strong adoptions of PanOptix in the U.S. and Japan, which will wrap around their launch date in the second half of the year. On a year-to-date basis implantable sales were down 15%. Consumable sales were $320 million, down 45% versus prior year, which is driven by slowdown in surgical procedures. As surgery levels increase, we anticipate we'll see continued improvement in consumables aligned with market trends. As expected, vit-ret procedures held up better than cataract, given the urgent nature of retinal surgeries. On a year-to-date basis, consumable sales were down 25%. Sales from the equipment and other category were $106 million, down 32% versus prior year. We're seeing limited major capital purchases as customers manage their capital budgets. However, revenues from equipment service and procedural eyedrops held up better than equipment in the quarter. On a year-to-date basis, equipment and other sales were down 18%. Turning to Vision Care. Sales were down 25% in the second quarter, reflecting the impact of COVID-19.…

Thanks, Tim. In this environment, our talented employees and deep customer relationships give us confidence to steer a steady course back to growth. June and July are providing encouraging data points that we’re on the road to recovery and we expect the markets to return to more normalized levels by the end of this year really next. It’s important to remember, our fundamentals are strong, and we continue to steadily deliver on our product pipeline that benefits our customers as they rebuild their practices. PanOptix and Vivity brings new advanced lens options for cataract surgery. Precision1 and our new Dailies Total1 and Precision1 lenses for astigmatism expand our contact lens portfolio to a broader consumer population. And our new Pataday family of over-the-counter allergy drops has bringing new prescription strength relief from ocular allergies. These are just a few examples of what we can achieve. And we stay focused on our commitment to help people see brilliantly. This commitment is secured by 70 years of experience and our dedicated associates who work every day to sustain Alcon’s ability to serve eye care practitioners and their patients in the post-pandemic world. And now, let's open up for questions.

Thank you. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] The first question today comes from Veronika Dubajova of Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Yes. Good morning, good afternoon. Thank you for taking my question. If I can start with just a little bit of color, David, on sort of how you're thinking about your competitive positioning in contact lenses? It's sort of notable that -- I think this is the second quarter in a row that you’re starting to kind of outperform the market a little bit. Just curious, how your thoughts are on -- is this just a function of your mix, either in terms of categories or geographies, or are you starting to see some green shoots from a competitive perspective from Precision1, and maybe if you can comment on durability of that as you move into the second half? That would be really helpful. And I will sneakily ask as well, if you will, very helpful, if you give a number on procedure volumes for cataract or if we can get a similar kind of metric for the contact lens market in July? That would be super helpful.

Thanks, Veronica. Let me start with the competitive position. I think, look, we've been very pleased with the development of our product line in contact lenses. Obviously, we've been by design targeting the fastest growing sections of the contact lens market. So, think about the SiHy market in particular, being considerably faster growing than the base market of contact lenses. Inside of that, really when you think about it, the SiHy toric and SiHy multi-focal growing even faster yet. So, DT1 has benefited from that quite a little bit and so does Precision1. It adds for us an accessible lens that has a terrific kind of DT1 quality to it, but at a price point, I think that it is affordable to a lot of folks. So, we feel good about the share gains, we’re making the progress, we're making new fits and then switch fits around Precision1. And I think importantly, going forward with the torics, it puts us in position to really benefit from the growth in that market, we have almost a zero share. We have a zero share I think in SiHy torics. We look forward to gaining kind of an appropriate share, commensurate going forward with our DT1 and Precision1 product torics. So, that's kind of exciting. So, I think the durability of that is pretty good. I think we see that going forward. On the contact lens piece, visits I think is really what we would comment on more than anything else. I think, visits have been kind of 80% of normal is what the physicians have been reporting to us. So, optometry, we use the Jobson survey, I think a lot of people do. That study I think showed 80% were backfitting lenses. Average patients per day were down 20%. So again, I think it's not back to normal. And you can see how that works, because of course they're having to limit flow through the office, they have to clean the frames after everybody touches them. So, it's just -- it's still going to be a while I think before we figure out how to get patient flow back. And on the contact lens side of that, and I think that's -- contact lenses still remain a high time involved, kind of chair time involved process to do fits. Now, I think, 96% of docs reporting, they're seeing new patients and they’re backfitting lenses. But again, I think, we think that's going to continue to be slow and kind of a slow, steady grind back to normal. So, again, we think probably normal looks like, beginning of next year.

That's helpful. Thanks, David. And Tim, can I just -- a follow-up please on the provisions you took for inventories and accounts receivable, if you can quantify that number? That would be super helpful.

Yes. Veronica, this is Tim. It was about $0.04 between both the credit losses and the inventory provisions.

Terrific. Thank you, guys.

The next question comes from Matt Miksic of Credit Suisse. Please go ahead.

Thanks so much for taking the question. So, one follow-up on PC-IOL and cataracts, and one on vit-ret, if I could. So, on PanOptix, really impressive share at these levels because the obvious question is, where can we go from here? How do you defend that? How did Vivity play into that strategy? And then, as I mentioned, one follow-up vit-ret.

Yes, Matt. We're encouraged by the performance of PanOptix. I think, maybe we thought -- we've always thought it would do well. I think the question we always had was at what pace would it get up the curve. And we've obviously been excited about seeing what's gone on in the U.S. and in Japan in particular. I think there's two things to think about when you think about the PC-IOLs. One is, just what's the wraparound look like and how much do we have room for growth. And I think, remember that exiting fourth quarter last year, we only had a 50 share. So, we're going to have growth year-on-year, probably into the middle of next year, even on U.S. and Japan. And importantly, when you kind of add in China and some of the other markets that we're just launching now, I think we see steady growth from PanOptix through the end of next year, for sure, and then really more market growth, I would think in ‘22 going forward. But, we're clearly going to be pushing on Vivity as we had planned. What we’re trying to do is make sure that we embed PanOptix, get our share to where we're comfortable that it's maximized with that product. And then, we'll bring Vivity into the market. We're starting that now in Europe, where we've had a good run with PanOptix. And I think we're seeing some positive additional patients coming into practices that are using AT-IOL. So, if you're already an AT-IOL surgeon, there are some patients who you may exclude from giving an AT-IOL because you can't see through a diffractive lens as easily to the retina. So, people with retinal disease and wish there are many as you get a little bit older, a lot of people have a retinal disease, are people with irregular cornea, where you've got a problem, a lot of times the surgeons will exclude them from AT-IOLs. And we think Vivity provides an alternative here that could add some patients into the market. So, we'll see how that takes shape, but, we think the performance of lens is quite good. And I think we were initially trying to figure that part out. Feedback from the markets in Europe and Canada have been terrific, so, we're feeling good over the long term there.

That's helpful. And then on vit-ret, you mentioned that there may be sort of a slowdown in new procedures because you sort of moved through the backlog, as some of these clinicians completed their predicted schedule of patients. Just maybe if you could talk a little bit about that business and what drives the patients in to the initial -- to clinic visits that puts them on schedule for surgery and what you can do to support that or just because this is kind of the acute end of the spectrum of things that need to be done for these patients, what can you do to support or accelerate those clinic visits? Thanks.

Well, vit-ret tends to be a pretty emerging category. So, there's not a ton of stuff that gets delayed truthfully. Obviously, when we shut down for the month of April and for part of May, depending on where you were in the world that had the -- that's going to have a material effect on the sales. But, vit-ret consumables for example for us was pretty solid. I mean, it was best -- it was better than cataract and better than an equipment and better than refractive. So, I think we feel good about what was going on there. I think, the only real effect on vit-ret was OR time and availability. There's probably a little bit of a delay in certain kinds of procedures. But more or less, we feel like that's a pretty good business moving along for us pretty well. It's really cataracts that are -- you can kind of defer for a while. And I think that's been the concern as to what's the pace at which this will come back. What they’re doing at cataracts is they're rescheduling kind of at 90-day intervals. So in April, they probably take the folks from April that were shut down and they moved them 90 days out. That's about the scheduling interval. And those will fill up the June-July registers for patients. And so, that will be the best way we can think about refilling the pipeline going forward. But, I think the market for vit-ret looks pretty good.

The next question comes from Jeff Johnson of Baird. Please go ahead.

David, just want to follow-up on the cataract comments. One, did I hear, market share this quarter for PanOptix in U.S. and Japan -- and I know it was 65% last quarter. I'm not sure I heard that. And any additional color you could give on that funnel filling up those cataract surgeries? I hear you on some of the backlog coming out. But what are you hearing about clinic visits? Clinic days for these ophthalmologists, are they filling that funnel back up at this point? How is that going versus the backlog just coming out? Thanks.

Sure. It's a little tricky to do that, because we're using survey data. And I'll give you what I know or what's been published and we can go from there. But let me start with the market shares. We were 70-plus in market share in the U.S. and Japan. We are doing quite well in that metric. I think, what you're going to continue to see is launches around the world, including China in the third quarter, which we're excited about as well. So, we think PanOptix will continue to do well, as we kind of move forward through the next year, so. On the office and rescheduling piece, I think what we do know is that 98% of surgeons right now are reporting they’re open. They're -- 93% have started some -- are reporting kind of normal -- some to normal surgery, 80% of the ASC based surgeons are basically saying they've got time that is available and probably 30% of other surgeons are saying they've got a greater than 30-day backlog. So, I think that's probably the metric that's most useful in thinking about this, which is a lot of -- there's a little bit of a Pareto principle in the surgery with our customers. So, 30% are saying they've still got a 30 or greater day of backlog, I think says we've got some room to go in terms of filling this out. But, we saw good June, we saw a pretty solid July. And I suspect that this works its way through the system over the coming months. But, we'll just have to see, because it's very difficult to kind of tell and tease out how much is rescheduled versus how much is refilled.

Understood. And then, Tim, maybe you could help us on stocking at the distributor level in the contact lens space. I think you mentioned it in June, did some of that continue in July? Do you feel like channel inventory is now at kind of a normalized level on the contact lens side? And then, we've seen from your competitors, one of your competitors in contact lenses take their rebates up quite a bit on the daily SiHy side. Is that anything you feel like you need to follow and any concerns there on their behavior in the back half of this year from a rebating perspective?

Yes. I'll let David comment on the rebating. As far as the stocking, we've worked our way through most of that. I think there'll be some more coming through in Q3, but that should normalize by the time we get to the end of the year.

And on the rebating, we expected the changes that have occurred in the market. We knew that Precision1 was a fairly powerful value proposition going right into the middle part of this market. And we've priced it where we think it's appropriate. So, while we have a rebate along with our own product, we feel like it's priced properly.

Thank you.

The next question comes from Steve Willoughby of Cleveland Research. Please go ahead.

Yes. Hi. Good morning. I just was wondering if you could provide maybe a little bit more color, you referenced a number of times sort of growth in the month of July. And I was just wondering, what specifically you were referring to. Is that growth across the entire business, growth on a year-over-year basis, growth compared to the second quarter? Maybe you could just provide a little bit more color there. And then, I have one follow-up.

Yes. Steve, I would just -- I would call the growth -- it’s kind of growth over prior month revenue is the way to think about that. And we're still working on how do we get to flat to prior year. Right? So, we're not there yet. And again, we're continuing to move forward with a belief that this normalizes for surgical kind of late this year, and then with Vision Care probably just comes a little bit slower, a little bit flatter recovery into -- probably drags into next year is our bet. The only additional color I'd say, we called last quarter that April would be the trough, which it was. There was some modest improvement in May. We really saw some significant improvement in June, and then some sort of slight improvement off of that. So that's how I kind of think about that, kind of a big jump in June and then just kind of progressing towards the points that we highlighted towards the end of the year.

Very good. That's helpful. David, my follow-up question is just on surgical equipment. Could you provide any perspective on what you think that could potentially look like over the next couple of quarters as compared to the results here in the second quarter?

Yes. Look, I think, you're going to see similar results on equipment. We don't expect the equipment market to really pick up until at least next year. I think, capital budgets right now in most hospitals are slim, if they're there at all, the same thing with the -- even the physician ASC. I think when you survey ophthalmologists or surgery centers, what you see is people putting off equipment purchases at least till next year. And that's really kind of what we expect once the capital budgets get redone for next year, we'll work on that. The thing that's important to consider is remember that a significant part of that equipment other bucket is our service revenue. And our service revenue is quite stable because it's a monthly service fee. And that's partly why you see it a little bit better than what you saw with the cataract volumes in general. So, volumes as we said were off -- they almost halved in the quarter or more than halved in the quarter. But the equipment kind of hung in there because the service revenue is pretty stable.

Thank you. The next question comes from David Lewis of Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.

Hi. Good morning. Just a couple of quick questions for me. Maybe to start, Tim, one for you on margins and maybe I'll follow-up with David. Tim, a couple of things. The second quarter has some different margins dynamics you've walked through. Could you just sort of help us just qualitatively, margins in the back half of the year, both gross and EBITDA, any dynamics to think about on the recovery? And then, you did talk about in the press release longer term margin initiatives. Are those LRP targets still intact? The timeline is still intact. And then, just a quick follow-up for David.

Yes. So, I would say about the second half, again, there's a lot of uncertainty out there. But, assuming that the revenues come back as we have called, so again, sort of Surgical gets back to normalized levels towards the end of the year Vision Care sort of an early part of next year. We're going to continue to monitor and I'll say toggle our expenses and investments towards that revenue. So, if those revenues -- if that revenue improves, we're going to continue to invest behind that. So, I would think about second half sort of SG&A ramping up in line with that revenue projection. And, again, assuming it all plays out, I would expect Q4 could be something, similar to Q4 of last year, if you think about kind of that OpEx spend, maybe a little less on the SG&A side, a little bit more on the R&D side, as you compare it from a year-over-year perspective. And as far as long-term guide, again, given the uncertainty, given the fact that we pulled our guide for this year, I would just say this -- the fundamentals of the business remain very strong. We still play in -- the markets will recover. We're very well positioned. We continue to invest in all of our strategic initiatives, whether it's the Vision Care lines, whether it's that R&D innovation, the separation, the transformation. So, it's too early to call now. But, the thesis I think is intact. And as we talked about earlier, we'll be coming out with a Capital Markets Day, probably in the first quarter of next year. And we want to see how 2020 settles down. And then, we'll give you some more color from there.

Okay, very helpful. And then, David, just on ocular health dynamics. There's a lot going on there. This particular year, we have some destocking, you talked about last quarter; we have had Pataday as well as maybe some solutions, demand dynamics. Please help us understand sort of the second quarter and sort of how you see the ocular health dynamics into the back half of the year? Thanks so much.

Yes. I mean, the second quarter was tough to read. I mean, it's -- I think you start with the elements of it that are easily reportable. And I think you see that the whole of the dry eye category, which is a piece of the market, was down 12% as a market; and then contact lens care as a market was down in the low 20s. And so, our relative performance basis, we were off 14, I think kind of, if you can work that through, I think what you'd probably see is that we're gaining share. We certainly gained here inside the allergy part of the market. We are gaining share, I think, in the in the dry eye piece as well. The contact lens, we’re roughly flat to slightly down in share. So, the thing I'd continue to focus on is share movement, because the stocking has gotten complicated. We thought that the stocking would improve a little bit in the second quarter. But, in truth, I think, they're still struggling to understand how much they want to keep at retail right now because there's a general retail view that they want to keep more than they need. And so, I think, we're concerned that the demand and inventories may not be perfectly aligned.

Thank you. The next question comes from Anthony Petrone of Jefferies. Please go ahead.

Thanks. Good morning. Maybe just on surgical -- one on surgical, one on contact lenses. I guess, as we look at the fourth quarter specific specifically, if we blend all of surgical together is the right way to think about it that we should still be modeling year-over-year declines. And then, specifically for IOLs, is there potential to actually see that flat by the full quarter or should we expect that to be also pushed into early next year? And then, on contract lenses, just given where J&J has gone with rebates, is there a risk on the share side, if the Company doesn't respond with a similar rebate? And I'll just have one quick cost question. Thanks.

On the IOLs, I think, the way to think about IOLs is we are gaining significant share at this moment. The markets are going to return to normal, largely towards the end of the year. So, I’ll have to leave it to you to forecast the markets themselves and then apply shares to them. We've held share really well. And we've actually grown a little bit share in monofocal, which is a positive. Our AT-IOL share is excellent. And our toric shares have always been high. So, we feel really good about our position in the IOL market. We're going to have to wait and see what the trajectory of the market is. And frankly, that's the big question that we're kind of all guessing at. But, I think the best way to model it is to kind of think about it as roughly back to normal at the end of the year. On the contact lens piece, look, we see the rebate. We've been taking share. That rebate’s been out there for a while now. We continue to gain share in new fits and switches with Precision1. Dailies Total1 continues to do really well, compared to the market. So, I think we feel good about our daily SiHy. And I would just suggest that the sustainability of a program that is giving away significant margin, you have to really pick that one through. I'm not convinced that we should respond in any other way that we have, which is with a superior kind of effort at marketing, the product that we've got, and we're doing a good job of that.

And then, just a quick follow-up would be on J&J litigation on the phaco side, but LenSx. And just a quick comment there, it looks like, it's pretty mature and I’d assume that this has no impact on the PanOptix momentum?

Yes. And we've seen that product for a while, we know what it is. And we're always following very closely any new developments in phaco. But, as you know, we have a very substantial phaco base in the market. We feel really good about our current offering in Constellation. We have a new handpiece called Active Sentry, which does some very unique things relative to fluidics and flow. And we're very comfortable I think with the technology that we have cannot be beaten.

Next question comes from Matthew Mishan of KeyBanc.

You gave some good color around the U.S. contact lens space. Not too much from Europe and Asia, what are you seeing in those regions, kind of faster or slower recovery?

Matt, the Asia market for Japan has kind of gone sideways as they kind of bump back into more COVID -- not shut down exactly, but they're struggling, I think as COVID cases came up. China has always been a pretty small market. So, in terms of total impact on us, it doesn't have a ton of impact. And so, I would say that part of the world is kind of, as expected. The European market I think will largely be more dependent on us launching new products. So, I would think about later this year as we launch DT1 toric and Precision1, Precision1 toric. Those are the products that are going to lose share in Europe, and I suspect that really has impact next year. Other than that, I think, we see the markets kind of very similar, right? So, the market Europe was down in the 20s. The Asia market was down directionally as well. So, not a lot of difference in the market impacts, and underneath that I think is the same competitive dynamics where you've got new product flow coming from us.

Excellent. And to sort of follow-up, you probably had some interesting perspective with your headquarters in Geneva. How should we think about the climb in the U.S. dollar impacting you? Is it a little different than just translation?

Yes. I mean, we hedge the balance sheet as many companies do. We do not hedge the P&L. And I would just say that in total, 1% move in the dollar is about $14 million of op income and about $40 million of revenue. So that's how I -- if it moves across all the currencies, that's how I think about it.

Thank you. The next question comes from Larry Biegelsen of Wells Fargo. Please go ahead.

Good morning. Thanks for taking the question, guys. One on 2021 and one on PC-IOLs. So, I guess, the question on 2021 is do you think you can get back to the level you're expected to be at in 2020, before COVID when you guided to 5% to 6% growth over 2019 and EPS of $1.95 to $2.05. Is that a good way to think about 2021 today, or could you potentially do better because of catch-up from postponed procedures? And I have one follow-up.

Hey, Larry. This is Tim. I applaud your efforts on the 2021 guide. Listen, I appreciate what you're trying to do. Again, I would just say this. We're not going to guide 2021. But again, the fundamentals of the business are strong, assuming that the revenues come back, as we’ve communicated, call it late Q4, early Q1, that should give you a Q4 exit rate. That's not too dissimilar to what we saw in Q4 of last year. And then, I think you just got to think through what are the growth rates that you want to assume and the productivity and what have you. And I kind of take it from there. But again, I appreciate what you're trying to do. We're going to kind of close out the year, and then we'll come out with the capital markets day in the early part of next year and give you guys a lot more clarity around 2021 and beyond.

That's helpful. And David on PC-IOL penetration, in the past, you've been pretty cautious. You've seen about a 50 basis-point increase in penetration in the U.S. on an annual basis for many years. And you've been cautious in the past. But, do you see that changing -- increasing, more than you expected, given the strength of PanOptix and a reduction in cataract surgery reimbursement? Thanks for taking the questions.

Yes. Larry, it's a good question. I wouldn't change my view on this one really. I think, we've seen over the years that there's kind of -- the penetration with waxes and wanes. I think that you may see some near-term PC-IOL penetration improvement, because of the enthusiasm around PanOptix and Vivity, but I would bet you that it settles back after a year or two. So, generally speaking, it's gone up with new products, and then it's going to fall back the next year. It's really hard to see it right now because the market is disproportionately weighted right now to some of the larger practices who got back in business quick and they tend to be higher PC-IOL users. So, be careful about assuming anything from the current market mix, because that may not be stable state, likely it’s not. And thinking about just one of the comment to add, Larry, as you think about ‘21, the way to think about it I think and model it is that if we can get back to normalized markets kind of towards the end of the year, go back and think about our market share and how that's done. Because I think, what I would encourage people to look at is, with the steady product flow and the basic market share performance we've got, I think, we can know what the shares are pretty well. And then, you just have to apply the market to it. And that part we don't know. So, you just have to kind of make an assumption about the market and work your way backwards because our shares are really quite good right now.

The next question comes from Chris Cooley of Stephens, Inc. Please go ahead.

Maybe just one quick follow-up to Larry’s question and I have an additional one as well. When we think about the PC-IOL category, increased sort of conservatism there and the growth in the category as a whole. But, could you maybe help us better frame for Vivity? I mean, obviously, you had very good initial feedback on that product or advice. Help us think about how that expands the total opportunity for PC-IOLs versus the current backdrop and maybe if you could provide some additional color that you saw on those initial trials. If I look at my notes correctly, you pulled forward that launch just ever so slightly. So, just I’d appreciate any color you could provide there. Thank you.

Yes. I think, we were cautious at the beginning on Vivity, principally because we wanted to see how the surgeons would react to it. And it's always a little bit different when you get it out into wide use. And so, we were careful about getting information and trial information out. And I think what we've seen now having worked with it for six or eight months in Europe and Canada and some other places is that we're getting very good distance vision. It has a nice landing zone. So, we think it's got a benefit to ease of use in terms of calculating and getting to a proper distance on corrected visual acuity. And then, we also get really good intermediate vision. So, I think we feel good about the those two focal points. We're getting pretty good near vision. But, the trade-off with this lens is, you really get to avoid all of the kind of typical [indiscernible] as the docs complain about this kind of driving at night, see halos and glare et cetera. So, this has monofocal light characteristics. But, if you were comparing it, say to PanOptix, you don't get as good a near reading vision, you'll have to do some other things to try and get there. And I think that that's probably been the trade off we were struggling with as to how does it fit with this. And I think what we've heard now and I think consistently hear from surgeons is that if you're already doing advanced technology lenses, what you're going to find with this lens is it provides an opportunity to bring patients who otherwise would probably give a monofocal lens because of an irregular cornea shape or because of a prior LASIK or because of retinal disease or some other need to do either -- you might exclude these patients because they're -- they have high driving at night needs, those kinds of things. And that may actually add some patients into this. So, that's a cautiously optimistic, more patients in to existing surgeons. And so we don't think this is a surgeon expanding idea, but we think it could be a patient expanding idea.

The next question is from Chris Pasquale of Guggenheim. Please go ahead.

Thanks. Two quick questions. One is just on optometry visits getting back to normal by early next year. You also talked about some potential headwinds for daily adaption. There's another element we've been wondering about, that’s supply depletion, and whether that could be slowed by contact lens customers who are now working or going to school from home, is that a potential headwind you're concerned about, just patients and how using as many lenses per week? And when do you think we'd actually start to see that in the numbers during reorder rates?

It's hard to tell. We've heard the same thing, but it's really -- right now utilization is tricky to get on a per patient basis to get on a per patient basis. I think there is intuitive, I think some slower where when people are at home, because to large degree there were -- they may wear their glasses at home. I do think there's an increasing desire to wear contact lenses when you're outside the home. And I do think that will pick up and maybe that offsets, maybe it doesn't. But I don't think we have any real clear line of sight to what the per patient usage is. I'd be giving you opinion as opposed to anything that we could give you concrete, Chris. Sorry about that.

No, it’s understandable. Thanks. And then just one quick one on ocular health, I wanted to make sure I understood the comments there, given all the moving pieces. So, do you expect to have the headwinds on that business in the back half of the year, because of inventory drawdowns? Is there any way to quantify how big that might be?

Well, I think there could be a little bit of continued destocking. We had -- as we said last quarter, we had a significant amount of stocking and pantry loading from patients who are worried about getting product. That will draw down over the next two quarters. We got some of it out in the second quarter. I suspect there's still a little bit more to come. But I think, it'd be kind of a minor headwind directionally. What we're looking at right now is significant share movement with Pataday. And so, we gained 10 share points in this category of ophthalmology. So, as you see the fall season kick up, we're hopeful that the -- that will translate into kind of a natural destocking, if you will.

The next question comes from Bob Hopkins of Bank of America.

So, just two quick questions. First, on the financial side, just a quick clarification about some of the comments that were made about next year. I guess, the way I'd phrase the question is, are there any COVID-related expenses or drains on free cash flow that could linger into 2021, or could 2021 be a fairly clean year from a cost and cash flow perspective, assuming demand comes back? Thank you.

Yes. I think, most of the -- the COVID-related expenses to think about going forward are really around that manufacturing absorption rate. So, we're going to continue to see some of that pressure to a lesser extent in Q3 and then more in Q4, and then it sort of works its way out. As far as the provisions around inventory, credit losses, again, we look at that on a quarter-by-quarter basis. We feel like we're adequately reserved right now and provided for right now. So, I wouldn't anticipate any more coming through. But again, we'll have to monitor that on a quarter-by-quarter basis. From a free cash flow perspective, the big thing to really think about is obviously, if you look just the first half of this year, we're down from an operating income perspective by about $400 million. So that obviously is a good proxy for free cash flow. So, we'd expect significant improvement next year. The only other thing to think a little bit about that's hard to call would be maybe on the receivable front. Again, we're working with customers, we're extending terms. So, our collections are a little bit lower than what we would have anticipated. So, some of that may work its way through back half of the year or first half of next year.

Okay. That’s good color. And then, David, for you, I was wondering -- you just talked a little bit about this already. But, kind of how would you characterize how much visibility you have into the back half currently? I mean, I ask the question, because you've mentioned some survey data, but then you also mentioned that a large portion of current volumes are just rescheduled cases. So, how we should characterize your visibility into the back half of this year?

I think, we're still really careful about it. Because candidly, it's hard to tell how much is -- in surgical, how much has been rescheduled versus how much is refilling. We have a pretty good visibility week-to-week from our sales force on what demand looks like directionally. We just don't know how much of that, again, is between rescheduled patients that were supposed to have surgery in April or May, they're now having surgery in kind of June and July. But, again, I think we have a directional view that most of this gets sorted out in this quarter that it should look like fourth quarter, it gets a little bit more normal, where demand and revenue kind of aligned with each other. But, again, we're projecting there and then we don't really know. So, directionally, visibility is pretty low to what we actually have on the books.

Thank you. In the interest of time, this does conclude our question-and-answer session today. The conference is now also concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.