Greetings. Welcome to Ashford Hospitality Trust Third Quarter 2021 Results Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. [Operator Instructions] Please note this conference is being recorded. I will now turn the conference over to Jordan Jennings, Manager of Investor Relations. Thank you. You may begin.

Good day, everyone. And welcome to today’s conference call to review the results for Ashford Hospitality Trust for the third quarter of 2021 and to update you on recent developments. On the call today will be Rob Hays, President and Chief Executive Officer; Deric Eubanks, Chief Financial Officer; and Jeremy Welter, Chief Operating Officer. The results, as well as notice of the accessibility of this conference call on a listen-only basis over the Internet were distributed yesterday afternoon and a press release. At this time, let me remind you that certain statements and assumptions in this conference call contain or are based upon forward-looking information and are being made pursuant to the Safe Harbor provisions of the Federal Securities regulations. Such forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, uncertainties and known or unknown risks, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. These factors are more fully discussed in the company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The forward-looking statements included in this conference call are only made as of the date of this call and the company is not obligated to publicly update or revise them. In addition, certain terms used in this call are non-GAAP financial measures, reconciliations of which are provided in the company’s earnings release and accompanying tables or schedules, which have been filed on Form 8-K with the SEC on October 26, 2021 and may also be accessed through the company’s website at www.ahtreit.com. Each listener is encouraged to review those reconciliations provided in the earnings release together with all other information provided in the release. Also, unless otherwise stated, all reported results discussed in this call compared to third quarter of 2021 with the third quarter of 2020. I will now turn the call over to Rob Hays. Please go ahead, sir.

Good morning and welcome to our call. I will start by providing an overview of the current environment and how Ashford Trust has been navigating the recovery. After that, Deric will review our financial results. And then, Jeremy, will provide an operational update on our portfolio. I first like to highlight some of our recent accomplishments and the main themes for our call. First, we had strong hotel performance and solid earnings in the third quarter that exceeded both street estimates and our internal forecast. Second, our liquidity continues to improve and our cash balances building. We ended the quarter with over $672 million of cash and cash equivalents. Third, we have continued to lower our leverage and improve our financial position. Since its peak in 2020, we have lowered our net debt plus preferred equity by over $1.1 billion, equating to a decrease in our leverage ratio, defined as net debt plus preferred equity gross assets by over 13 percentage points. Finally, even with an already attractive loan maturity schedule, we remain proactive in our capital markets activities and balance sheet management. During the quarter, we successfully refinanced a mortgage loan for the Hilton Boston Back Bay, which had a final maturity date in November of 2022 and this financing addresses the only significant final debt maturity in 2022. We have made significant progress on refinance our upcoming debt maturity at the Marriot Crystal Gateway City, Gate -- Marriott Gateway Crystal City and hope to have more information for you soon on it. We are optimistic about the long-term outlook for the company and by taking decisive actions to shrink our balance sheet, we feel well-positioned to capitalize on recovery we are already seen in the hospitality industry. Subsequent to quarter end, we announced an amendment to our strategic…

Thanks Rob. For the third quarter of 2021, we report a net loss attributable to common stockholders of $47.5 million or $1.70 per diluted share. For the quarter, we reported AFFO per diluted share of $0.11. We are pleased to report that our adjusted EBITDA ROE for the quarter was $46.8 million, which is the strongest numbers since the first quarter of 2020 and a 49% increase over the second quarter of 2021. At the end of the third quarter, we had $3.9 billion of loans with a blended average interest rate of 4.2%. Our loans were approximately 11% fixed rate and 89% floating rate. We utilize floating rate debt, as we believe is a better hedge of our operating cash flows. However, we do utilize caps on those floating rate loans protect the company against significant interest rate increases. Our hotel loans are all non-recourse, and as Rob mentioned, nearly all of them are currently in cash traps, meaning that we are currently unable to utilize property level cash for corporate-related purposes. As the properties recover and need the various debt yield or coverage thresholds, we will be able to utilize that cash freely at corporate. We ended the quarter with cash and cash equivalents of $673 million and restricted cash of $85 million. The vast majority of that restricted cash is comprised of lender and manager held reserve accounts. At the end of the quarter we also had $24.1 million in due from third-party hotel managers. This primarily represents cash held by one of our property managers, which is also available to fund hotel operating costs. We also ended the quarter with net working capital of $707 million, compared to net working capital of $9.8 million at the end of 2020, which highlights the continued improvement in our…

Thank you, Deric. Comparable RevPAR for our portfolio increased 166% during the third quarter of 2021, while house profit flowed through with a solid 48%. We’re extremely encouraged with the continued acceleration of occupancy at our hotels, with the third quarter outperforming the second quarter 63% to 57%, respectively. Additionally, we’re outperforming in the U.S. upper upscale chain scale in the third quarter occupancy by 700 basis points. While the recovery continues, we’re seeing a number of hotels stabilized at performance metrics that exceed 2019. I’d like to spend some time highlighting some success stories. The Hyatt Coral Gables produced phenomenal results during the third quarter, with hotel EBITDA exceeding comparable 2019 by more than $725,000. That is a 163% increase. The performance premium is being propelled by additional occupancy that is driven by an airline contract that our team was able to secure early during the pandemic. This increase in base business has allowed the hotel to shift our revenue strategies and being more proactive in pushing rate, resulting in a RevPAR increase of 25% over the third quarter of 2019. Our La Concha Key West property has also done an excellent job exceeding the 2019 results, with the hotel EBITDA increasing 143% during the third quarter relative to 2019. A lot of that success is attributable to the hotel’s topline growth, with the third quarter RevPAR increasing 70% relative to the comparable period in 2019. The revenue team identified an opportunity to capture additional business, resulting in booking a government training program, which added an additional 5% of occupancy to the hotel during the third quarter. Our Renaissance Nashville produced $6.8 million in hotel EBITDA during the third quarter, which exceeded the comparable period in 2019. These results are on the back of the hotel selling nearly 22,000…

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our first question is Bryan Maher with B. Riley Securities. Please proceed.

Good morning, guys. Thanks for taking my question. Starting out with the large cash hoard you have basically accumulated over the past, I don’t know, six months to nine months, how do you think about deploying that as opposed to holding cash and I know that there are reasons to hold cash. But as it relates to maybe, A, making a whole on the preferred accrued dividends, which I think is $20 million, which is maybe 5% of what you have in cash, taking care of Oaktree? And then bigger picture, maybe peeling away at some of the portfolio financings such that you come to an agreement with the lenders and I know there’s Oaktree obstacles in here, but making it such that you can peel away the assets in the portfolio financings that you really want to keep, being able to sell the ones that you really don’t want or you can take advantage of buyers in the marketplace and then maybe pitting new fresh debt on those assets you really want to keep. How are you thinking about that with all of your cash?

Yeah. That’s a good question, Bryan. I think you’re hinting at the exact thing that we’re thinking through right now, which is, we do have these, I guess, kind of structural obstacles that come from this strategic financing and the various make holes, which do overall incent you to sell closer to those -- the ending of that make-hole period, which is going to be, I guess, 15 months from now. But it is something where we have had initial discussions with several of our lenders on alternatives around that to see if there are certain assets that if we did sell them, even though currently those pools don’t meet the tests required, whether it’s by debt yields or coverage ratios, in order to normally extract them, are those possible to do now? So those are conversations currently underway. And I do think, as you said, we’ve got to -- we obviously are looking for ways to go on the offense with our capital, as opposed to just being on the defense. But we also have to look at all of the cash needs that we have, which do include also paying off the strategic financing, bringing our preferred to current, which would lead us to also need to bring the strategic financing current as well. So if we’re going to make the, call it, $20 million preferred payment to catch people up, we also need to catch up the deferred payments on that, that’s another $30 something million. And then we’ve obviously got some CapEx that is starting to ramp up over the next 12 months to 24 months. So we do have some cash needs that we have to be thoughtful of and in the back of our minds, also be cautious to the extent that we don’t…

Great. And just as a follow-up, I think, Jeremy mentioned, $40 million to $55 million in CapEx for 2021 and that you had already done the ballroom renovation in Atlanta. How much is left of the $40 million to $55 million to do in the fourth quarter of this year? And what do you think that there might be in 2022 and is there deferred CapEx from the past 12 months to 24 months that that might make that higher than maybe you previously might have thought and that’s all for me.

Yeah. I will take that. We’re probably close to $20 million that we hope to do in the fourth quarter. So it’s just -- it’s always timing is kind of tough, because we’ve got a lot of renovations typically in the fourth quarter and it just depends on when we actually pay out all our vendors. And so I am not sure if we’re going to hit $55 million, which was top end of the range. I think that’s probably unlikely. So it’s going to be probably closer to $40 million and I think to-date we spent about -- close to $50 million. Now next year we haven’t put together our capital plans, but I would say that there’s not a lot of deferred CapEx. We’ve gone through our portfolio in pretty good detail and there’s not a ton of renovations that we see for next year.

Thank you.

Thanks, Bryan.

Our next question is from Tyler Batory with Janney Montgomery Scott. Please proceed.

Hi. Good morning. This is Jonathan on for Tyler. Thanks for taking our questions. First one for me, rates continued to be strong in the quarter and I am curious if that’s all from leisure travel or if there’s been some pickup in corporate that’s impacting that positively? And then maybe bigger picture, can you provide any additional color on how you’re thinking about rates long-term, particularly with business transit becoming a more meaningful contributor presumably in the future?

Yeah. Let me -- there’s some interesting stats that are popping out in the quarter in regards to kind of corporate versus leisure travel and it’s really looking at the weekend versus weekday disparity, because obviously, historically speaking, you’re typically having higher occupancies, or I guess, similar occupancies, but higher rates on the corporate side and right now, it’s the inverse. It’s the opposite where we’re seeing both higher occupancies on weekends by a decent amount. But then you’re having also a rate premium as much as $20 to $30 on the weekend leisure. So it’s a unique scenario that, I don’t think we’ve ever seen before in our industry. So right now we think out of our occupancy, probably, 5% to 6% of that is corporate transient. So it’s still a very small percent of our overall occupancy. So, I’d say, right now, it’s still the majority of the rate gains is actually driven by leisure, not corporate. I’d give you a little bit more specifics. So in the third quarter, our ADR for weekend travel was up 12%, which is pretty impressive and the RevPAR was up 5%. So where we’re seeing the declines, as Rob mentioned, is a weekday travel. And traditionally, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday was always the bread and butter of this portfolio. But the business transient customer has been a little bit slower to come back, but we’re seeing that accelerate each month. But specifically, we’re down about 60% from 2019 in our business transient segment. And then looking in the group, in 2022, we’re actually pacing ahead in ADR about 3%. That’s in comparison and that’s 3% increase over 2019. That compares to 2021, which our ADR, compared to 2019 was down 19%. So there’s a pretty big delta we were able to kind of push rate in certain segments that we haven’t been able to do coming out of the pandemic. So I think that’s a really positive sign.

Yeah. And I think that’s what is one of the maybe underappreciated opportunities in the industry for investors as they look at the recovery is, typically, if we had this sort of occupancy losses, our rate would have collapsed. And you’re typically digging yourself out of this ditch of rate so that it takes, it’s not until you’re several years into the cycle before your rates are at a comparable and competitive level. Well, in this situation rates are already close to or in some cases higher than they were in 2019 with significant occupancy losses still existing. So that gives us pricing power that is makes us also very bullish, and obviously, being able to push rate is highly profitable. So I think there’s a -- that shouldn’t be lost on investors, the opportunities of being able to push rate.

Great. I appreciate all that detail. And then, any update that you guys can provide on the labor headwinds that seem to be impacting the industry, has there been any noticeable difference or easing, I should say, post the Labor Day? And then, how are you thinking about balancing labor going forward and into the future and the other cost pressures back as the business trended continues to ramp?

Yeah. I think that, so on the cost pressures, we’re still seeing cost pressures. But the majority of the pressures where we really saw the wage increases was in the second quarter. So we’re still seeing some wage pressures in the third quarter, we still expect some in the fourth quarter, but it’s coming down pretty significantly when you look at the percentage increases. In terms of the open positions, it hasn’t been a problem yet in terms of impacting our revenue. And what I mean by that is that, we haven’t had to take out rooms and put them out of service or anything like that because we can’t clean them and a part of that is just because the occupancy is still a little bit lower than what we would like to see. But we do have open positions. I think it’s about -- we’re running at about 13.5% or so in terms of open positions at our properties and that is down from the previous months, but it’s not down dramatically. And so, hopefully, we will see more of an acceleration than we actually saw after Labor Day in terms of filling those positions.

Very helpful. Thank you. And then, a last one, if I could, turning to the group side, Jeremy, you’ve provided some helpful stats on the ADR in 2022. But I am curious what -- if you have any additional color on the demand or future bookings in 2022 and how that’s been progressing, any color that you can provide there?

Yeah. So as we sit right now, the group room revenue compared to 2019 for 2022 is down 24%, but that’s, in spite of an increase in the ADR, a slight increase in the ADR, which is, yes, very healthy by design. I don’t think we will actualize there. We’re seeing pickup and we’re getting a lot. We’re seeing that the lead times for bookings continue to be very compressed versus what it was before the pandemic. And so I would anticipate that that 24% will continue to come down each quarter, yeah, and so we will actualize somewhere hopefully much less than that.

Yeah. But again if that same goes down 25% right now should compress. Again, the ADR on that is still up 3% over 2019. So, again, it plays into that broader rate story, which is a positive for us.

Okay. Very helpful. Thank you for all the color. That’s all for me.

Our next question is from Chris Woronka with Deutsche Bank. Please proceed.

Yeah. Hey, guys. Good morning. Thanks for taking the questions. I guess this one’s maybe for Jeremy. Jeremy, can you talk a little bit about where leisure rates are versus corporate either now or third quarter versus historically? And I guess the question is, when you remix a little bit next year, it’s obviously going to be very net additive, because you’re going to have more occupancy. But rate, I mean, is there a widening gap between what you guys see in leisure and corporate negotiated rates?

Please check and see if you have the speaker line muted.

Okay. Hey, Chris.

Okay.

Sorry, a little technical difficulty for a minute.

Yeah.

I apologize for that. When we look at leisure and with the -- especially to look at this probably right now is just to look at our weekend rate increase. So we’re up 12% in the quarter ADR in our weekend rates from 2019. All these numbers are compared to 2019. Weekday travel is down 12%. So it’s definitely -- the spread of ADR is definitely continues to occur. But what we are seeing is that business transient actually is picking up more gains than leisure segment, but it was down somewhat more than leisure as you know. And so even though we are continuing to have larger gains in our business traveler, it’s still off quite a bit from 2019.

Okay. That’s helpful. Thanks, Jeremy. And then you guys mentioned a lot of progress on property tax appeals. I -- the question -- is that going to help more in 2021 or is that more of a 2022 event in terms of how you’re going to book the expenses or any refunds?

Yeah. I think it’s going to help in both years. I think that we’re going to see savings in both 2021 and 2022.

Okay. Very helpful. And then also, you may mentioned it earlier, but trying to get a sense for select service versus full service operationally, because some of your full service hotels, you don’t have a ton of resorts and some of them are in the more suburban markets, not a ton of city center. So is there any sense you can give us for how your full service is performing versus select service in kind of those outer markets?

Yeah. Really, I’d say, in some ways it’s less dependent upon full service versus select service and it’s really more market-by-market. I mean, because even the select service properties that we have in certain MSAs are underperforming the limited service assets in other markets. So I think the better way to look at it is where are your markets performing and right now the weak markets continue to be the Bay Area, Chicago, Philadelphia, Minneapolis and around New York. And those markets are just having a harder time, particularly because of their -- it’s been actually because there’s been a debate, I think, in the industry of our various mandate and other COVID prevention mechanisms going to cause travel or performance in certain markets to help it or hurt it. Do people feel safer and so they’re willing to go or is it they’re seen as a hindrance? And I think what we are seeing right now is the markets that performed stronger, tended to be in markets that had less COVID restrictions. So particularly, for example, the national asset. That seemed to be an asset where once the COVID restrictions and mandates were removed and it was an attractive leisure market that hotels started to kind of unleash and really perform well. So I don’t know if it’s as much limited service versus full service as it is market-by-market.

Yeah. Very helpful.

I had one little comment on that is that, I was pleased and surprised with how well our Boston assets did in the quarter. So it’s good to see some markets, urban markets that I would have otherwise anticipated to be a little bit slower to recover pretty significantly. And so I think you will see that in some of these other markets that have underperformed, it’s just a matter of time that you’re going to see a massive bounce in the Bay Area and in some of the other urban locations that have underperformed pretty significantly.

Got it. Very helpful. And if I could sneak one last one in and it’s a question about the labor, you guys talked about, but are you seeing any differences in the open positions geographically? Is this more of a problem in urban or the northern half or southern half? Any kind of color that you could give us on where the shortages or -- are?

Yeah. It’s interesting that it is, in some ways, it’s hard to tell, because in those markets that are urban is that that also tends to be where we’re having the lower occupancies. And so in some of the markets like in the New York MSA or in D.C. or in the Bay Area, it hasn’t really been a significant issue, because we’re still operating at the lower occupancies than we would like. And then, again, some of these other markets, where the economies have opened up a little bit more, it’s been a little bit easier to get people. So what I think is still left to be seen is when some of these, when D.C. and New York and Minneapolis and the Bay Area start -- really starting to push occupancy a little bit more, what happens then? I think that our guess is that it’s going to be a better situation than it is now and that it will probably be a somewhat difficult but not overly difficult. But it’s hard to know right now. We just -- and sometimes you don’t really know until you’re out pounding the pavement and trying to round up new associates and employees at the outset.

what I’d add to that, Chris, is that, it is a pervasive issue across the country in terms of the labor shortages, but there is a difference between the states that stop the enhanced benefits before -- relative to the other states and so I can use maybe Nashville as an example that in June of this year, we were very concerned about being able to ramp up and staff up given the massive acceleration of snapback of occupancy when that market opened up. We were just very pleased with the demand, so very concerned about the ability to service the property. When those benefits did run out, it was about three-week lag time and we were able to fill a good amount of positions. But we still are running a little bit higher open positions across the Board, even in hotels that have ramped up. So it’s a pervasive issue, but you’re seeing a lag time on the markets that kept the enhanced benefits in place, if that helps.

Yeah. Yeah. Very helpful. Thanks, guys. Appreciate it.

[Operator Instructions] Our next question is from Michael Bellisario with Robert W. Baird. Please proceed.

Thanks. Good morning, everyone.

Good morning.

Good morning.

Rob, I want to go back to the balance sheet. I guess, first part of the question is, one, when do you think you will have enough cash on hand, is there a number that you guys have in mind that you’re targeting as you think about issuing shares and raising cash? And then, second part of the question is, any timing incentives for you to get the preferred accrual and the Oaktree pick paid back sooner rather than later aside from the obvious accrual that’s occurring?

Yeah. All right. Good question. So for the first one, let me, at least, one point out that, while we did raise some capital in the third quarter, it was substantially less than we did in the second quarter. And so there is a, given where our share price is and we are obviously very cautious on what is that share price and where we’re raising capital at to be very thoughtful around that. So there is obviously some trends there that you can look at. But it’s hard to come up with the exact number, but there is -- there are goals that we’re trying to accomplish. And the goals are that we’re trying to accomplish is, one, we are beginning to pay off the strategic financing and that could be as much as, call it, $300 million that we need to pay off at some point in time here. We do need to bring these preferreds current. That’s our preference. In order to do that, as long as we have the strategic financing, there’s -- that will be a $20 million payment. We will need to bring the strategic financing current as well and that’s another, call it, $30-ish million and then we also have these other kind of CapEx needs. So we do have some capital needs that we have. I think it really is going to depend upon what happens here over the next few months in terms of the return of business transient and what the recovery looks like. And our goal is to maintain a certain amount of cash so that to the extent that for whatever reason there’s other risks in this recovery, other variants, that we’re still have ample capital to weather those storms, because this has been a very uncertain time. At the same time, if the winds blow in our direction that we will pivot very quickly and as we sit here now, our underwriting many assets and many acquisitions to be ready to see and pivot towards going on offense as soon as we feel comfortable with the capital that we have. So I can’t give you an exact number, but what I can tell you is we obviously have slowed down the raising of our capital and are keeping a close eye on the trajectory. In terms of the preferred, we also have our preferences to pay off soon. The important factor that we’re trying to get to is getting back to what’s called S-3 Eligibility, Shelf Eligibility. And in order to do that, we do need to have those preferreds current and that -- in order for that to happen, we would need to complete that by the end of this year. And then once our 10-K was filed, which is probably February of next year, then we would have that eligibility. That’s our intention. That’s our preference. But, again, that’s still TBD. It’s not yet been finalized by the Board.

Got it. And if the preferred are current year also then presumably paying the quarterly dividend then those two then, right, that would reserve?

Yeah. That would be -- we would then be paying those on a go-forward basis and we would be paying the strategic financing basically on current basis as well.

Got it. And then on acquisitions that you touched on a couple of times, but fast forward is it six months or is it more like 18 months or 24 months when you think you would be in position to grow the portfolio again and then what do at least that you said today, what do the target assets and markets look like?

Okay. Good question. I mean, I hope it’s something that comes with the new year. I mean, I think that’s what in our ideal world that the recovery continues to take hold and as we’re getting into next year, that we can pivot to go on offense, because we are seeing a lot of opportunities and we are spending nearly sitting our deal meetings every week and are looking at opportunities and there’s a lot out there, which is exciting. We just need to accomplish a few other things first. But I think the assets will be comparable and similar to what we’ve done historically over the last three years to five years that it will predominantly be full-service assets. They will be most likely franchised assets where our affiliated with Remington can really add value and pull a lot of levers. They will mostly be affiliated with Marriott, Hilton, and Hyatt branded assets. So I am sure we will have a mix of independents. And they will probably be a predominantly transient-based demand, that’s what we do well. It’s unlikely that we will be buying huge urban big box assets. That’s never been what we’ve flourished at. And they will continue to be, I’d say, well diversified across top 25, top 30, top 40 markets. There’s just a lot of great markets out there that we think were underappreciated by institutional investors and Wall Street that we’ve been invested in and are performing well now and we think those markets continue to exist. So, I think, it will be assets that feel similar to acquisitions that we’ve done in the last few years like La Posada in Santa Fe or the Hilton and Alexandria in Old Town Alexandria in Virginia or the Hilton in Santa Cruz that assets are performing great. So those are the types of assets that we will be doing.

Got it. Thank you.

We now have a follow up question from Bryan Maher with B. Riley Securities. Please proceed.

Yes. Thank you. Just to be clear on getting back to the S-3 Eligibility, you’re required to pay, make current on the preferred, which I think you said was about $20 million. $30 million for Oaktree, that brings you current that you’re not required to pay off Oaktree to be S-3 Eligibility…

Correct.

Is that correct?

That’s correct. There was a provision in our loan agreement that obviously typically in a strategic financing like that typically a lender is not super thrilled about leaking cash flow out to a junior liability. So, but obviously, the strategic importance of being S-3 eligible is important to us. So the negotiate a deal with them was that we were able to pay that -- pay the preferreds current, bring them current and continue to keep them current as long as, one, we maintain a certain amount of liquidity and cash on our balance sheet, which we obviously meet today and that we effectively pay them current, as well as opposed to picking them or having them accrue. So that’s the stipulation and it -- we’re allowed that to do that starting in December of this year.

Got it. And then more of a big picture question. I mean, look, we all know for the past 15 years that Ashford has preferred to do floating rate financing versus fixed rate. But in the world that we live in today with material concerns on inflation and the potential for interest rates to push higher over the next couple of years, as you refinance debt over the next, let’s say, 12 months to 24 months, is there any thought process within Ashford to start to layer on some more fixed rate debt?

Good question. I guess we are always open to considering things that might be a better structure. It’s just that in our experience and analysis over time, you’re almost always better off being a floating rate hotel owner. Now the question is, is there something different today than there’s been before? And obviously, you’re looking at whether there’s risk to hyperinflation or other inflationary risks where it would be a negative. It’s something we will look at, Bryan, but given the flexibility that exists within floating rate debt and the fact that we typically have to buy caps on them anyway, so to the extent that there is a significant move in the rates, we’re protected from that perspective. We just find that pairing your assets and liabilities and the other benefits of the floating rate debt typically benefit the portfolio. So, I think, we’re willing to spend some time to really think about it and look through it, but if I had to put money on the table right now, I would say, we still anticipate being predominantly floating rate debt.

Right. I mean, I get that, but you guys also ran a higher leverage than everyone else and it didn’t kind of work out over a pandemic scenario. And to the extent that we do have some hyperinflation and the interest rates were to spike, and I know that there’s a huge amount of debate over that, it just seems to me that the institutional investor community might feel better and maybe even assign you a higher multiple with at least some respectable component of a fixed rate debt versus floating. I just think it’s -- I understand all of the studies you’ve done, but it seems like it could be a multiple overhang for your valuation to continue down that road in a hugely uncertain interest rate environment. So just kind of throwing that out there but we will be interested in seeing what you do?

No. And I think, if the answer is, hey, companies that have a higher fixed rate component get significant multiple premiums, well, that also is an important factor to consider. I haven’t seen a data or analysis to support that, within the hospitality side, but if that is indeed the case, that’s possibly a very important factor for us to consider as we’re contemplating it.

Okay. Thank you.

Thanks, Bryan.

We have reached the end of our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to management for closing remarks.

Thank you for joining us and we look forward to talking with you all on our next earnings call.

Thank you. This does conclude today’s conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time and thank you for your participation.