Carlos Boero Hughes
Analyst
Thank you, Mariano. Good morning, everyone. Let’s start on Page 4 where I would like to comment on our industrial performance. During this quarter, crushing activities reached 3.8 million tons, 54% higher compared to the same period of year. Investments that we’ve been doing since the beginning of 2017 are paying off. In this, the expansion CapEx we deployed to increase nominal crushing capacity of the cluster and the expansion area explained the growth in crushing activities. Adequate weather conditions in turn resulted in a 48% higher effective milling days. At the same time, enhanced industrial operations allowed us to make a better use of our fixed assets. Please jump to Page 5, where I would like to highlight our agricultural productivity. We remain pretty focused on agricultural productivity since we understand that this is among the main drivers for becoming a low cost producer. Over 70% of total production costs are related to sugarcane production at the field. As a result, sugarcane yields in the first half of 2018 reached 96 tons per hectare, 8% higher year-over-year. In addition to enhanced agricultural efficiencies, higher yields were explained by adequate weather conditions during the first semester of 2018 which favors cane development coupled with a longer average growth cycle for the cane harvesting comprehend to the previous season. TRS content reached 120 kilos per ton in the first six months of 2018, 3% higher year-over-year. The combination of these two effects resulted in TRS production per hectare of 11.5 tons, 11% higher than last year’s first semester. Let’s turn now to Slide 6, where I would like to discuss our production mix. As you can see on the top of the chart, ethanol production more than doubled during the first six months of 2018, compared to the same period of the previous year, reaching 304,000 cubic meters. We continued maximizing ethanol production in order to benefit from higher ethanol-related prices. Indeed, out of the total TRS production, 77% went to ethanol. This marked our record high and represents a 40% increase year-over-year. As it can seen in the bottom right chart, and anhydrous and hydrous ethanol traded at 17.3 and 16.4 cents per pound sugar equivalent on average during this semester, which represents a 38% and 31.7% premium to sugar respectively. The high flexibility puts in evidence the high quality of our mills allowing us to rapidly shift production in response to changes in relative prices. Furthermore, ethanol weight on EBITDA distribution for the sugar ethanol and energy business, almost doubled in the first six months of 2018, compared to the same period of the previous year, reaching 65% of total recorded EBITDA. At the same time, sugar represents only 20% of total EBITDA generated during the first half of the year. Let’s move ahead to Slide 7. In the top right chart you can see that exported energy rated approximately 230,000 megawatt hour in the second quarter of 2018, 39% higher compared to the same period of last year. This was mainly explained by the availability of additional bagasse, as a result of higher crushing activities. Energy prices, at the same time, increased in the quarter, explained by higher consumption and dry weather conditions. Cogen efficiency went down 11% from 67 kilowatt hour per ton in the second quarter of 2017 to 61 kilowatt hour per ton in the second quarter of 2018. As we significantly increased crushing operations, we accumulated lower gas and overconsumption capacity at the boilers. It’s worth mentioning that the leftover bagasse will be carried forward and burnt throughout the second half of the year. Our efficiency ratio should increase in tandem. Let’s please turn to Slide 8, where I’d like to discuss quarterly sales. In order to analyze the evolution of total revenues, it’s necessary to evaluate the average realized TRS price. During the second quarter of 2018, average TRS price suffered an 18.5% reduction compared to the same period of last year. As we will shortly see the dynamics of each of the components of that price, sugar, ethanol and energy, was quite different. However, it’s worth noting that during the second quarter of 2017, we maximized sugar production. And as a consequence, the weight of sugar when calculating the percentage change in total revenues is quite large. Declined sugar prices will mostly drive the evolution of total revenues during the second quarter of 2018. Having clarified these points, let’s now analyze the indicator evolution of each product. In the case of ethanol, as we decided to keep on maximizing ethanol production, sales volumes increased by 49% compared to last year. Average selling price reached $456 per cubic meter or $0.21 per pound sugar equivalent. The combination of these effects resulted in a 47% increase in net sales. In the case of energy, net sales increased 33% year-over-year. As previously explained, this was a result of the combination of highest selling volumes and realized prices measured in US dollars. Regarding sugar, sales volume totaled 106,000 tons marking a 41% reduction compared to the same period of last year. Again, this fall is a result of having maximized ethanol production. Sugar prices in turn continued the downward trend resulting in 56% lower net sales. Let’s please turn to Slide 9, where I would like to discuss production costs. In the table you can see at the bottom, total production costs during the first half of the year reached 6.3 cents per pound, 26% lower compared to the same period of last year. This is mainly explained by higher crushing volumes that contributed to the lower fixed costs, enhanced agricultural and industrial efficiencies and a decrease in Consecana price, which resulted in lower leasing expenses. It’s important to highlight that unit costs measured in dollars were further reduced by the year-over-year depreciation of the Brazilian real. In order to get to total cash cost production, maintenance CapEx should be added on the ground strap, even if it’s not expensed, maintenance CapEx in the sugar and ethanol industry is recording CapEx that needs to be done to maintain industrial and cane productivity. However, it’s worth nothing that most of the maintenance CapEx is deployed during the first half of the year. Historically cash cost calculations on a quarterly basis. As we get to our annual crushing targets, total cash costs should be in a range of $0.93 to $0.96 per pound. Finally, to conclude with the Sugar, Ethanol & Energy business please turn to Slide 10, where I would like to discuss financial performance. Adjusted EBITDA for the first semester of 2018 reached 128.9 million, 41% higher compared to last year’s same period. The main factors that contributed the increase were, a 54% increase in sugarcane crushing, higher ethanol and energy average selling prices and selling volumes and a 3.9 million higher result from the mark-to-market effect of our commodity hedge positions. These positive effects were partially offset by 1.3 million higher loss resulting from the updated fair value of our unharvested biological assets, as a result of lower sugar prices. Furthermore, adjusted EBITDA margins net of third-party commercialization went from 47% in the first half of 2017 to 78% in the first six months of 2018. Let’s now move to Page 12, where I would like to focus on the current status of the 2017 and ‘18 harvest years. As of the end of April, harvest operations for most of our crops were almost ended with 88% of total area already harvested. We expected to harvest the remaining area during August. On a consolidated basis, yields have decreased as a result of the drought that hit Argentina during the first quarter. It’s fair to say that most of the impact is already booked and we should not expect any further significant effects. Rice yields reached 6.9 tons per hector, 16% higher compared to the previous harvest year. Dry weather, coupled with a longer exposure to solar radiation allowed the crop to properly develop. At the same time, higher agricultural technification enhanced efficiencies and contributed to higher yields. It’s important to notice that it’s evidence to benefits of our production diversification strategy applied to mitigate weather risk. Towards the end of the second quarter of 2018, Adecoagro began its planting activities for the 2018 and ‘19 harvest year. As of the date of this report, a total of 36,533 hectors of wheat has been successfully planted and are developing normally favored by adequate soil conditions. Let’s move to Page 13, where I would like to walk you through the financial performance of our Farming business. On a quarterly basis, adjusted EBITDA for the farming business was $25 million, a 127% higher compared to the same period of 2017. This improvement is mainly attributed to the $6.5 million and $7.2 million increase in results in our Crops and Rice business respectively. It was primarily explained by enhanced operational efficiencies, the depreciation of the Argentine peso which together rebounded in a reduction of production costs, and higher yields from our Rice business. On a cumulative basis, adjusted EBITDA totaled $43.8 million, 43% above last year. In addition to previous year drivers, these positive results were partially offset by the negative mark-to-market of our commodity hedge position. Let’s move to Page 14, where I would like to walk you through our Land Transformation business. Adjusted EBITDA for our Land Transformation business during the first six months of 2018 totaled $36.2 million compared to a nil result during the first six months of 2017. During June 2018, we completed the sale of Rio de Janeiro and Conquista farms located in Western Bahia and Tocantins respectively. The aggregate selling price reached $53 million for a total of 9,300 croppable hectares. I would like to highlight that both farms were sold at a 37% consolidated premium to the latest Cushman and Wakefield independent farmland appraisal. Over the last 12 years, we have been able to generate gains of over $200 million by strategically selling at least one of our fully matured farms per year. Monetizing a portion of our land transformation gains allows to redeploy the capital into higher yielding activities enabling us to continue growing and enhancing shareholder value. Let’s move to Page 16, which shows the evolution of Adecoagro’s consolidated operational financial performance. Adjusted EBITDA during first half of the year totaled a $199 million, marking a 78% increase year-over-year. Improvement in the sugar, ethanol, and energy financials performance was primarily driven by the maximization of ethanol production, higher energy selling volumes and realized prices, and lower costs of production as a result of higher crushing volumes, enhanced efficiencies and depreciation of the Brazilian real. At the same time, improvement in the Farming and Land Transformation financial performance was explained by lower production costs as a result of enhanced agricultural and industrial efficiencies in our Rice business, the $36.2 million capital gain from the sale of Rio de Janeiro and Conquista farms, and the deprecation of the Argentine peso, which contributed to cost dilution measured in dollar terms. We expect our Adecoagro’s production volumes and financial performance to continue growing in line with historical growth, mainly driven by the consolidation of our sugarcane cluster, and an increase in operational and financial efficiencies in each of our businesses. To conclude, please turn to Slide 17 to take a look at our net debt position. As you may see in the left chart, our gross indebtedness as of March 31st of 2018 stands at $811 million, while net debt stands at $665 million, 16% higher year-over-year. Our more aggressive inventory carry strategy, coupled with the CapEx deployment explains the increase. It’s important to highlight the fact that even though net debt has increased from $574 million in the second quarter of 2017 to $665 million in the second quarter of 2018, the ratio net debt-to-EBITDA has remained relatively flat at conservative levels. I’d likely mention that our debt is very well structured in the long run, with an average maturity of approximately seven years. We have a strong and healthy balance sheet, which puts us in a good position to pursue any opportunistic M&A opportunities. Thank you very much for your time. We are now open to questions.