Garo Armen
Analyst · Jefferies. Please go ahead
Thank you, Dr. Buell. And good morning and thank you for joining us for our quarterly update today. In 2014, we started the transformation of Agenus, with an intent to make it an immuno-oncology engine. In the past four years, we have built a company that is delivering innovation with speed. Today, I will describe our progress and achievements in three areas, which are of great interest to you and to us. First, we have made substantial progress in delivering our discoveries into the clinic and advancing our PD-1 and CTLA-4 programs, which are in the clinic and on a pass for a potential BLA filing. The evidence for our progress is easy to track. We filed five INDs in the 18 months prior to the start of 2018. Our programs are on track for additional sixth IND filing this year, three of which have already been filed. Furthermore, we are working to file two more INDs in the first half of 2019. All of these represents discoveries from our research pipeline and our either best-in-class or first-in-class compounds. They also represent products designed to address tumor resistant pathways with the potential to be the next major breakthroughs in immuno-oncology. In addition, as I alluded to, our proprietary CTLA-4 and PD-1 antibodies are progressing towards a planned BLA filing in 2020. Second, I will discuss our cash position and balance sheet. Please know that we are aware of concerns related to these issues and I will address them. As I mentioned, we are progressing our programs and filing INDs at a record pace. At the same time, as you will hear shortly, we are prudently satisfying our near term cash needs. Third, I will provide an update on our recent progress in establishing new strategic partnerships. We expect these to result in potentially significant cash infusions into Agenus this year. I will start with what I believe is in your mind and something which is very important to us, our balance sheet. Our cash balance at the end of 2017 was $60 million. At the end of Q1 it was $51 million, and we closed the second quarter with $43 million in cash. We've been managing our cash positions prudently as I said before, with an intent to minimize dilution to shareholders. At the same time, we have been advancing our compelling and exciting pipeline of programs. We expect these 14 plus innovative immuno-oncology candidates to be major near-term value drivers. Hence advancing them rapidly is critically important. Until we secure additional cash, which I will speak about when I discuss our partnership prospects, we will continue to prudently manage our finances. What this means is that our cash position at the end of our current quarter, that is the third quarter, is expected to be near or above current levels. Next item, which is pressing in everybody's mind, is the status of our partnering activities. I will provide an update on this with transparency while respecting the sensitivity of these discussions. I will outline our partnering strategy first and our plans in prior calls. However, we have not yet made an announcement inspite of the additional time that it has taken to close on a transaction, we are working to maximize value to Agenus, and to our shareholders with the right fit. Let me first speak to what has changed in the IO landscape, IO obviously is immuno-oncology; and how this has influenced the prospective partner profiles and transaction types that we're pursuing to-date. The first major change is the unanticipated successes and failures in clinic in the past year alone. The complexity of immuno-oncology is better appreciated today than it was even six months ago. Most biopharma companies are looking for, first in-license assets that belong to one of the following categories. Either first-in-class and multifunctional assets to explore complimentary biologic pathways or later stage compounds with clinical safety and efficacy data with an intent to mitigate development risks. Over the past year, with the advancement of our pipeline, we have strengthened our position in both of these categories. To be specific, late last year we made a deliberate decision to accelerate our two first-in-class bispecific programs. This resulted in advancing timeline by six months. Since then these programs have attracted substantial new interest from partners. And why is this? Because they modulate multiple immunosuppressive pathways that address the limitations of currently approved, as well as clinical stage immuno-oncology agents of today. We also advanced our PD-1 and CTLA-4 programs. We continued and confirmed that our antibodies are equivalent if not superior to competitor agents. This has generated interest from new perspective partners, seeking foundational therapies to establish a footprint in the immuno-oncology space, and explore combinations of their own, novel immuno-oncology agents with these foundational antibodies. The second major change has been that new and sophisticated players are entering the immuno-oncology field. These companies have invested significant time and resources in specifically understanding the broad and deep immuno-oncology portfolio that Agenus has built. Agenus' pipeline of antibodies bispecific vaccines and cell therapies is unparalleled in the field. A broad partnership can offer significant financial resources to advance our pipeline, while also retaining commercial rights to part of our portfolio ourselves. So, what does all of this mean to us? Multiple discussions for broad strategic transactions have matured over the last quarter, and we're currently working 24/7 to bring one or more of them to closure with a target announcement date, possibly as early as the next eight weeks. Next, I will say a few words about the progress we've made with our existing partnerships. To-date, we have delivered on all our obligations in our partnerships with Incyte, with Merck, and with GSK. We have met or exceeded all research, IND filing, and commercialization milestones. In the current quarter, we expect to receive two additional payments for milestones that have already been achieved and a third is expected by or around year-end. Our QS-21 adjuvant as you know is a component and I might add a very important component of GSK's Shingrix vaccine. As you may be aware from media coverage, sales for Shingrix are substantially ahead of earlier forecast, making additional milestones from our recent royalty transactions more likely. And lastly, before I turn the call to Dr. Sunil Gupta, I will provide summary of our operational activities in the first quarter - first half of the year actually. This year three of our discoveries resulted in three IND fillings. These include fillings for LAG-3 and TIM-3 antibodies under our partnership agreement with Incyte. We also filed a third IND, which covers our next-generation neoantigen vaccine, AutoSynVax, we call it ASV. We expect our ASV neoantigen vaccine to be developing in combination with our CTLA-4 and PD-1 antibody. The next IND filing will be for our next-generation CTLA-4 designed to deplete Tregs while improving T-cell priming rather. Our discoveries covering this and other antibodies are published earlier this year in a T-reviewed publication in the high impact journal called Cancer Cell. Our next-gen CTLA-4 has both potential efficacy and safety advantages relative to approved and clinical stage molecules and is designed to address the limitations of our current immuno-oncology products. In addition to our next-gen CTLA-4 IND filing, we are also on track to file INDs for two of our first-in-class bispecific antibodies. The thirst of these improves tumor microenvironment to multiple mechanisms to enable a better antitumor and immune response when combined with standard of care and other immunotherapies. The second deplete Tregs specifically in the tumor microenvironment, but not in the periphery. We are not aware of any other agent in the immuno-oncology space that is capable of doing this. These two tumor microenvironment conditioning agents offer critical solutions to also overcoming the limitations of current immuno-oncology treatments. You will hear more specifics on these compounds, as well as enter - of course as they enter the clinics early next year we are more likely to talk about their identities specifically. As I said before, speed and innovations for meaningful clinical advances are our dogma. Our discovery platforms have enabled our pipeline of four therapeutic classes, checkpoint modulating mono and multi-specific antibodies, cellular therapies, neoantigen vaccines, and adjuvants. Our cell line development and manufacturing platforms enable fast path to INDs which give us an advantage in advancing products to be LA filings. We have demonstrated the speed in advancing our CTLA-4 and PD1 combinations towards potential BLA filing as early as 2020. This is just four years after our first-in-man monotherapy trial commence. Additionally, earlier this year, we set records for production of GMP grade products for our lead bispecific programs. Our completed development and at scale manufacturing of our AGEN1223 compound in under two months from research to cell bank is to our knowledge the fastest ever in the industry surpassing even conventional antibody development timelines of any one. I want to highlight these accomplishments even though they may not sound exciting to you because without them it would be impossible for us to be filing so many INDs in a four years span. Let me now turn to our progress in the clinic. To-date we have treated a total of approximately 116 patients with our CTLA-4 and PD-1 antibodies separately and in combinations. This year we presented compelling data on the pharmacodynamic activity of our anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 antibodies at both AACR and at ASCO. We reported at ASCO that our PD-1 monotherapy AGEN2034 that is a PD-1 molecule generated clinical benefited more than 20% of treated patients. We look forward to presenting updated data later this year. We anticipate clinical benefit to be even more robust and importantly more durable. We have reported exciting results from our CTLA-4 monotherapy trial at ASCO with 31% of treated patients with refractory cancers showing clinical benefit. And in a sarcoma patient who was refractory to multiple prior treatments had a complete and durable response to the lower source our AGEN1884 that is our CTLA-4 molecule. This patient remains disease free today over one year later. Our CTLA-4 and PD-1 programs are advancing in three active clinical trials to-date designed to take advantage of accelerated pathways for approval, BLA filings in as early as 2020. My colleague and head of regulatory and pharmacovigilance Dr. Sunil Gupta will describe our plans in more detail in just a day. In summary, our active clinical trials include PD-1 monotherapy in patients with refractory cervical cancer. Two, CTLA-4 plus PD-1 combinations that are - we anticipate will further expand response rate and durability of responses in the same cervical cancer setting to monotherapies alone. And three, and this is an important indication, CTLA-4 monotherapy in patients refractory to be PD-1 because this is a significant unmet clinical need today. All of these trials require relatively small numbers of patients for approval and short-term endpoints for the same. In our trial so far we have observed particularly exciting clinical benefit in gynecological cancers. These findings impressed key opinion leader experts and catalyzed our recent engagement with the gynecologic oncology group called GOG. This is a group that had a terrific track record for patient enrollment and trial successes including the approval of topotecan and later Avastin for patients with cervical cancer. Our initiatives to advance programs in second line cervical cancer exemplifies our commitment to provide access to effective agents - our agent specifically with current treatment options have limitations. At the same time, these efforts represent important commercial opportunities for us. This year alone aggregate commercial revenues for anybody target PD-1 and CTLA-4 are expected to reach $15 billion. And there are forecast that in several years these numbers will be as much as $30 billion. We have defined several development paths including the second line cervical cancer which are we expect will enable us to capture a meaningful portion of this large market. There are 13,000 new cases of cervical cancer annually and 4,000 deaths unfortunately in the U.S. alone. As we aggressively engage regulators and secure our BLA filings plans, our regulatory team is under the guidance of an industry veteran Dr. Sunil Gupta. Dr. Gupta is a superb regulatory strategist with a several medical background who I might say is one of the most understated individuals I have met. Dr. Gupta is trained as I said, a trained oncologist with nearly 30 years in senior leadership positions. He joins us from Sanofi where he had distinguished 22-year career which included leading the filings of anti-PD-1, a PARP inhibition or inhibitor and approval of oxaliplatin and cabazitaxel. And it's my pleasure to turn the call to Dr. Gupta. Sunil?