Good morning. My name is Julianne, and I will be your conference operator. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to ADTRAN Holdings Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2025 Financial Results Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Thank you. Mr. Peter Schuman, Vice President, Investor Relations, you may begin your conference.

Thank you, Julianne. Welcome, and thank you for joining us today, and welcome to all those joining by webcast. During the conference call, ADTRAN representatives will make forward-looking statements that reflect management's best judgment based on factors currently known. However, these statements involve risks and uncertainties, including those detailed in our earnings release, our annual report on Form 10-K as amended and our other filings with the SEC. These risks and uncertainties could cause actual results to differ materially from those in our forward-looking statements, which may be made during the call. We undertake no obligation to update any statements to reflect events that occur after this call. During today's call, we will refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures. Reconciliations of GAAP to non-GAAP measures and certain additional information are also included in our investor presentation and our earnings release. We have not provided reconciliations of our first quarter 2026 outlook with regard to non-GAAP operating margin because we cannot predict and quantify without unreasonable effort, all of the adjustments that may occur during the period. The investor presentation has been updated and is available for download on the ADTRAN Investor Relations website. Turning to the agenda. Tom Stanton, ADTRAN Holdings' CEO and Chairman of the Board, will provide key highlights for the fourth quarter and full year 2025. Tim Santo, our Senior Vice President and CFO, will review the quarterly and full year financial performance in detail and provide our first quarter 2026 outlook, and then we will take questions that you may have. I would now like to turn the call over to Tom Stanton.

Operator, we are receiving notification that the line is bad and that recipients are not hearing us correctly. Is there a way to improve the line before we proceed?

Thank you very much.

Thank you Peter, and good morning, everyone. ADTRAN delivered a strong fourth quarter and finished 2025 with solid momentum. Our quarterly results reflected higher demand and strong execution with revenue above the high end of our original outlook, overcoming typical year-end seasonality. Operating leverage continued to improve and earnings came in above expectations, with all 3 business categories achieving sequential and year-over-year growth. In the fourth quarter, ADTRAN generated revenue of $291.6 million, reflecting a strong year-over-year growth of 20% and sequential growth of over 4%. This marks the sixth consecutive quarter of sequential growth and the fifth consecutive quarter of year-over-year improvement, reinforcing the strength of our company and our key markets. Our U.S. business led the quarterly growth, with revenue up 31% year-over-year and 14% sequentially. Non-U.S. revenue grew 12% year-over-year and declined 3% sequentially as expected and consistent with recent ordering patterns among some of our larger European customers. Optical Networking Solutions grew 33% year-over-year, driven by strong sales to cloud providers and enterprise customers. This increase also drove the contribution of enterprise and cloud providers to 25% of our revenue in Q4 and 21% for the full year of 2025. These results reinforce a trend we are seeing: cloud providers expanding data center capacity and large enterprises upgrading their optical networks. During the quarter, we continued to broaden our optical customer base. We saw solid activity across service providers, cloud providers, enterprises and public networks, reflecting the flexibility of our optical platforms across different use cases. Access & Aggregation revenue grew 9% year-over-year and 6% sequentially, supported by continued fiber access investment across U.S. and European operators. During the quarter, customer activity reflected a mix of expansion projects and network upgrades as operators advanced deployments. In Subscriber Solutions, revenue grew 17% year-over-year and 3% sequentially, driven…

Thank you, Tom, and thank you all for joining us this morning. We delivered strong results for the fourth quarter and full year 2025, driven by solid execution and healthy revenue growth. As scale improved, we delivered higher margins, and operating efficiency increased across the business. We remain focused on disciplined cost management as we continue to grow. Over the quarter, we continued to operate with tight financial processes and consistent execution. These remain embedded in how we run the business, improving visibility and planning rigors and supporting structured capital allocation. While the mix between gross margin and operating expenses can shift from quarter-to-quarter as revenue moves, our objective remains focused on steady margin expansion as the business scales. As we noted on our previous earnings call, the capital actions we took last year improved our financial flexibility and added optionality. Broadly, our focus remains on simplifying the capital structure and maintaining flexibility to support the business and create value. We will continue to deploy cash thoughtfully to reduce the minority interest over time while maintaining balance sheet strength and evaluating noncore asset monetization opportunities as appropriate. Turning to the financial results for the fourth quarter of 2025. Revenue was $291.6 million, up 20% year-over-year and 4% sequentially, above the high end of our original guidance. Year-over-year growth was driven by all 3 product categories with Optical Networking the largest and fastest contributor, with revenue increasing by $26.9 million or 33% from the prior year. Geographically, non-U.S. revenue accounted for 53% of total revenue, while U.S. revenue accounted for 47%. Non-GAAP gross margin increased to 42.5%, up 44 basis points sequentially and 122 basis points year-over-year, driven by scale efficiencies, product mix and cost discipline. We remain focused on sustaining gross margin in the 42% to 43% range over the…

All right. Thanks very much, Tim. Julianne, I think at this point, we're ready to open it up for any questions people may have.

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Michael Genovese from Rosenblatt Securities.

Great conference call, clearly upbeat messaging. Tom, can you just talk a little bit more, I guess, specifically about the demand picture in U.S. and Europe and sort of what you're seeing from your clients on the optical side and on the fiber-to-the-home side? And just talk a little bit more about the drivers of the revenue growth. And I guess related to that, like do you think -- obviously, you're not giving full year revenue guidance, but coming off a year where you grew 20%, do you think double-digit growth is -- top line growth is in the cards for '26?

Yes. So let me start on a little down, which is we don't give full year guidance for a reason, and that's because our outlook is -- typically are still our book-to-ship period is relatively small. So it's a little difficult. Let me speak a little bit more about the kind of the environment that we're in right now. I would say it's kind of the same tone and kind of building momentum that we saw throughout last year. And we expected that to continue on, and that's exactly what's happening. So we -- on the fiber-to-the-prem side, nothing has slowed down. Programs are still going well. We're still adding new customers to those product areas, and we're continuing to operationalize carriers in Europe. So all of that is just a continuation of the same type of activity we saw last year. On the fiber front, the dynamic is a little bit different because we were still at the very beginning of the year, kind of crawling out of the revenue inventory uptick that we had seen in our customer base. That cleared itself up last year. We started seeing that real progress in the second half of the year. We also -- as you may be aware that we had won some additional customers, both here in the U.S. with wider scale kind of Tier 2 deployments as well as in Europe, where we won some Tier 1s, and that momentum is just continuing on. I would say that is driven not just by the Huawei replacement which is going on in Europe, but just in general, I just think activity, we just saw customers starting to unleash capital, and they're trying to increase their bandwidth for obvious reasons. I mean, I think all of them are trying to figure out how they're going to play in a new AI-driven world. I think MoFi is a driver. We definitely -- I mentioned it on the call, we saw some real positive momentum on the enterprise side, which includes ICP carriers, right? So yes, it's just generally a good environment.

Great. And then my second and last question will just be on pretty wide operating margin outlook of 4% to 8% for the quarter. So is that because of things like memory prices, that the range is that wide? Or is that kind of maybe more of a normal range and I'm just reading it as being wide?

To us, I don't think there's any difference in the range that we get than what we typically do. There is tightening supply, as everybody is aware of, on memory. There's some tightening supply in optics. But I would say that that's not overly impacting the guidance range. Our kind of operating model is still what we fully expect it to be, what we've communicated, which is operating expenses in the low 100 range and gross margins in the 42%, 43% range. I don't see we see a deviation from that. Tim, any comments?

No, I would reiterate, as Tom said, the guidance range is about 4 points, which if you look historically is where we've been. And it's actually up a little bit from last quarter. But the leverage model would remain up from what we guided last quarter.

You mean midpoint, yes.

Our next question comes from Ryan Koontz from Needham & Company.

I want to ask about optical, maybe if you can unpack a little bit. You talked about enterprise ICPs, I assume that's a big driver of optical. Do you have any ideas, like how much of that is really hyperscale and AI data center cloud-related versus what I would call like traditional SP and enterprise networking? Can you maybe help us understand some of those dynamics there within the optical strength?

Sure. So there was actually a good contribution on both of those fronts in the quarter. And I'm trying to think if it was -- I would say -- and this is not having the note in front of me -- that the mix on traditional enterprise, including the banking sector and all of the larger enterprise that we play into is a portion of that. And then ICP did come in stronger in the quarter than what we had historically seen, and we expect that momentum to continue on through this year.

Great. And I recall a conversation from OFC last year about this opportunity in MOFN where the hyperscalers are contracting with traditional SPs or maybe some of the Tier 2s like Colt, et cetera, to build for them. Are you seeing some benefit there as well? And would that show up in your SP business as opposed to your enterprise business if it was a MOFN-type deal?

No, that would show up in our carrier. We would consider that to be a carrier customer. And we're definitely seeing that. We talked about that in the last maybe couple of conference calls, how we were starting to see some of the carriers position themselves to be able to do MOFN. That's just a continuing ongoing kind of upgrade cyclical thing that's adding positive momentum to that business. So -- but that is separate and apart from the enterprise piece that we're talking about.

Great. And maybe just one last, if I could, on the fiber-to-the-home side. Relative to new footprint, it seems like the U.S. has been a little bit hit-and-miss where some segments do better than others. Any update there on how Q4 turned out in terms of new greenfield footprint and how you're thinking about '26 going forward for U.S. fiber-to-the-home greenfield builds?

Yes. I think it was -- I'd call it a solid quarter, kind of consistent with what we had seen in the year. I mentioned that the -- in general, the U.S. business was definitely stronger on a sequential and year-over-year basis. I think we're expecting good things this year. We finally -- I probably shouldn't say the word, but BEAD dollars are actually starting to flow. We got a customer in Louisiana that is expecting BEAD dollars hopefully next week. So -- and I don't want to over-rotate on that guide because the build-out is going to consistently be driven for most carriers by kind of fiber deployment for this year and then equipment next year. But the fact that, that's actually flowing is real positive. I think there's 6 other states that are -- expect money any day now. So the fact that those dollars are starting to flow, I think, is a positive thing. And it's just as positive, not just the BEAD dollars, but from a planning perspective and knowing that it's going to happen and giving carriers surety as to how they plan their capital budgets is very important.

Right. So the planning, engineering and maybe the fiber optic cable spending this year from BEAD sees an earlier uptick, you're saying than your equipment would see this year that would follow within quarter 2 behind...

Yes, you've got to be able to deploy that fiber. But I think the positive thing for us, which we don't know how that will impact, and it may just be just a kind of positive influence is the fact that you get surety in your budget planning cycle. But not just your BEAD funding, but your normal capital spend as well. And I think that, that's been missing for some time.

Our next question comes from Christian Schwab from Craig-Hallum.

Great execution in the quarter, guys. Tom, I know -- so we're sitting here at the end of February, noncore asset sales and potential building sales and leaseback activity. Would you be disappointed if we didn't have resolution on both by the end of calendar 2026?

Well, leaseback activity, more than likely, that is not going to happen with the North Tower -- excuse me, the East Tower. So let me be clear on where we are with that. I think we've been trying to talk about this now for a couple of quarters. We did get several lease offers on the building. Financially, it didn't make sense for us because of where we are with our cash position right now and what we use for the cash and what that lease would ultimately cost us. So we have put that on hold. We can always revisit that if we want to. Then on the North/South Tower, which is the thing that's up for sale, I'm going to let Tim jump in here and give you an update on that.

A lot of activity in the Huntsville market. We're not currently under contract, but we have activity. So we continue to work that, and when the right deal comes along, we will close that. As we had hoped it would happen in 2025, we are very optimistic it will happen in 2026, but the market will dictate.

Great. And then on the noncore asset side, Tom, do you think that can get resolved this year? Or is that a fluid situation?

Yes. So we -- let me try and do this in a proper way. We have taken a look at the noncore assets. We've gotten values on what we think the noncore assets that we think are not strategic, right, to our business. We have -- we are doing things right now that we think will increase the value of those assets, and we'll reevaluate that in the second half of this year.

Perfect. And then my last question, as we go throughout calendar 2026, is there one area -- we spoke positively, obviously, about finally loosening up after many years of seeing some progress as speed is concerned. But as we look at equipment replacement in Europe, the strength in optical, geographical strength in Europe, et cetera, is there one thing more than another that you're most excited about as we go through 2026 that we can monitor?

Yes. So I think -- let me just hit on a couple. One is I think enterprise is doing really well. And as I mentioned earlier on the Q&A, there are multiple drivers for that. We expect that to be strong this year. And so that strength is above whatever the company is doing on a corporate average perspective. So that's really good to see. The other is there is some legislation going on. I don't know how much success it's going to have. It's good that it's going on, but in the EU right now to accelerate the Huawei replacement piece. It's not so much whether or not that actually happens, which there is a high likelihood it happens. But just the focus on that is positive for our business. And I'll remind people, we think that's a near $1 billion a year type opportunity that Huawei is selling into the European market that we think we have a very good chance of being able to capitalize on. So as that pressure continues on, and it is -- there was legislation that was sent out in the EU in early of last year that is positive, right? So that addresses this issue. So yes, so I think both of those things are real positive catalysts.

Our next question comes from George Notter from Wolfe Research.

I guess I just want to keep going on the question of Huawei replacement in the EU. I think the regulatory stance currently basically has it not compulsory to replace Huawei, but I guess, suggested would be kind of the idea in terms of the current regulatory environment. And I know the stuff that's coming down the pike is going to mandate Huawei replacement, and it sounds like it could be a few years away until that legislation actually requires companies to -- or carriers to replace Huawei. But I guess I'm just curious, like what has the inflection happening right now? Is there something you're seeing with your customers that allows them to move more quickly? Is it funding? Is it more pressure from a political perspective? I guess I'm just trying to understand what's driving this.

Yes, sure. Yes, I agree. Well, let me just make one caveat to that. Although the EU's directive is more of a recommendation, the country-by-country and carrier-by-carrier requirements or legislative actions are different, right? So we do have some countries in the EU that have explicitly been stronger on that. And it's not so much that -- I think that legislation and the talk about legislation and the fact that we're even talking about it here is exactly the point, which is if you're a carrier and you're doing a new award, you're kind of crazy to be deploying Huawei at this point. Or if there's a new region, a new footprint that has to be built out, even if they're an approved vendor, you know you're going to have a problem. So what that's doing is putting on -- increasing the braking pressure on continuing to deploy them on an ongoing basis. I would agree that pulling them out is a different thing, and that will take years. And we've characterized that north of -- and it's an easy math, George, for you to do, right? It's a north of $10 billion opportunity for the pull out. But what we're talking about is just on the annual spend, where they're going in and filling in new [ cars ], building out new footprint. That kind of activity is going to continue to slow down.

If I look at that $1 billion annual spend, how well positioned do you think you are on that? I mean, obviously, that's across a number of product categories. It's across a large number of specific operators, maybe some you're in, some you're not. I mean, is there a way to kind of pin down that $1 billion in annual spend in terms of what's like reasonable for you?

Yes, please. Let me not be so sloppy on that number. The last time we looked at it -- and we do have another -- we have an outside firm trying to take a look at exactly what that number is at this point. But that number is derived from about an $800 million, I think it was $850 million or $860 million number for EMEA in our target product areas, and that was in '24. We think that, that number is going to continue to slow down. It was north of $1 billion not that long ago. So that number will continue to slow down as we actually pick up that market share. Now that's for products that are specifically in our product sweet spot, which is kind of mid-mile, regional network optical, access and aggregation. It is those products that we're actually talking about. So it's really what we believe the TAM is for our products. But like I'm trying to say, it's a rough number right now, and it's just based off of the earnings results of Huawei.

Our last question comes from Dave Kang from B. Riley.

First, regarding European telcos, you talked about them being front-loaded. Just wondering if you can kind of quantify whether it's 55:45 or is it more exaggerated?

I'm sorry, your question broke up for me. Can you rephrase it or restate it?

Yes. Regarding your European telcos, Tier 1s. In the previous calls, you said they tend to be front-loaded. Just wondering if they're like 55:45 or more like 60:40. Any color?

As far as in the year, is that what you're talking about?

Yes.

I don't know if I've seen that actual breakout. I would say it's definitely -- last year, it was probably 60-ish, 40-ish, and this is just off the cuff. And this is predominantly in the access and agg product category. So you'll see that -- last year -- you could see that last year in our Access & Agg number. You actually saw that kind of big bump in the first half of the year, and then it kind of tailed down. It's not as prominent in the rest of the product areas. They kind of -- they're just not on the same cycle.

And are you kind of expecting similar dynamics this year or any changes from last year?

Really good question. I will tell you, we weren't happy with that bump because of what that does operationally. Bumpy is never as good as smooth. So we have been talking to them about that and trying to get that to be more even flowed this year. So I don't know how successful we've been with it at this point. So hopefully, you won't see that same type of kind of waterfall.

And my second question is regarding the same European telcos. Just where are we in terms of their broadband deployment cycle? Are we still early stages or mid or getting towards the late innings?

Good -- well, if you take Europe as a whole, there's no way to characterize it other than early. We've brought just recently, some new carriers on that haven't been deploying with us, and then they all kind of have this Huawei issue as well. If you take specific areas, there are countries that are farther along. The U.K. is, I would say, kind of more towards the middle. Germany is probably -- definitely within the first half. So it depends on the carrier. Some of them are -- haven't started yet.

Got it. Thank you.

Okay. At this point, I think we are -- no more questions in the queue. So I'd like to thank everybody for their participation today, and we look forward to talking to you next quarter.

Ladies and gentlemen, that concludes today's call. Thank you for your participation. You may now log off.