Adam Grossman
Analyst · Cantor Fitzgerald.
So thanks for taking an interest there. But you see it, look, there's -- there's a handful of KOLs, if you will, that control a large part of the PI population. But we think that there is headroom. We think that there are certainly many more clinicians out there, many more prescribers that are just learning about. Something that I was just thinking about as you were talking, we've also started running print -- print ad campaigns, which is strange, right? This is the world of digital. My experience and what our market research tells us is that immunologists like to pick up the actual journal of Clinical Immunology and -- and a couple of other publications and they like to actually flip the paper. So we started running print ads. And I think that, that speaks to the fact that ASCENIV is starting to be recognized. It's a brand name that is synonymous with immune deficiencies. I think it's something that we've really worked hard at joining the name ADMA, the name ASCENIV with immune-deficient population. But I do feel very confident that there is a lot of headroom available for us in gaining more -- we think that there is a ton of penetration opportunities among the existing prescriber base. Remember, roughly about 10%, 20%, 30% of every prescriber's patient population has these co-morbidities. And as we get more data in the public domain, as we're publishing more data, as the pharmacoeconomic impact is starting to show even more benefits, we think that we're going to see existing growth at same-store institutions. We think that there are tremendous growth prospects with new prescribers new infusion companies, new and specialty pharmacies that we haven't yet tapped into. And I really do see upside there. I don't think it was your question, but asked about subcutaneous. And I'll just touch on that for a second. While we have no intention today to go for a subcu route of administration. I want to say that there was a publication from another immunologist, KOL, who on their own, did a study and they administered ASCENIV in the subcutaneous route. I believe that, that publication was at a European meeting, I don't recall which one, but I can get back to you on that. But what I can say is that I think that, that answers part of your question is that prescribers are learning about the drug, and they're starting to get more comfortable with the product and use it in novel ways. So we feel good that there's a lot of room for us to grow. Hopefully, that answers the question.