Good morning, and welcome to the Archer Daniels Midland Company’s Third Quarter 2014 Earnings Conference Call. All lines have been placed on a listen-only mode to prevent background noise. As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded. I would now like to introduce your host for today’s call, Christina Hahn, Vice President of Investor Relations for Archer Daniels Midland Company. Ms. Hahn, you may begin.

Thanks Stephanie. For those following the presentation, please turn to Slide 2, the company’s Safe Harbor statement, which says that some of our comments constitute forward-looking statements that reflect management’s current views and estimates of future economic circumstances, industry conditions, company performance and financial results. These statements are based on many assumptions and factors that are subject to risks and uncertainties. ADM has provided additional information in its report on file with the SEC concerning assumptions and factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in this presentation, and you should carefully review the assumptions and factors in our SEC reports. To the extent permitted under applicable law, ADM assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements as a result of new information or future events. On today’s call, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Pat Woertz, will provide an overview of the quarter. Our Chief Financial Officer, Ray Young, will review financial highlights and corporate results. Our President and Chief Operating Officer, Juan Luciano, will review the drivers of our operations performance in the quarter and provide an update on actions that are improving returns. Then they will take your questions. Please now turn to Slide 3. I’ll now turn the call over to Pat.

Thank you, Christina, and welcome, everyone to our third quarter conference call. This morning we reported adjusted earnings per share of $0.81, and adjusted segment operating profit1 of $914 million. Our net earnings were $747 million, or $1.14 per share. Segment operating profit1 was $1.07 billion. The team delivered very strong results in the third quarter and made significant progress improving earnings and returns. Corn Processing managed their product mix to serve good demand and optimize margins. Continued improvement in international merchandising results supported the ongoing recovery of Ag Services. And Oilseeds Processing again delivered solid results overall, benefiting from good demand and its diverse footprint and product portfolio. We also continued to advance our portfolio management. Since the beginning of the third quarter, we signed a deal to sell our global chocolate business; we reached an agreement to acquire Specialty Commodities Incorporated; and we completed our acquisition of WILD Flavors. In mid-October, we completed our previously announced buyback of 18 million shares, and that is ahead of our year-end target. Given the strength of our balance sheet and our strong cash flows, we expect to repurchase up to 10 million more shares by the end of 2014. Now, I’ll turn the call over to Ray.

Thanks Pat, and good morning, everyone. Slide 4 provides some financial highlights for the quarter. Adjusted EPS for the quarter was $0.81 per share compared to $0.47 last year. Excluding specified items and also excluding net timing effects, adjusted segment operating profit was $914 million, up $282 million or nearly 45% from last year. The effective tax rate for the third quarter was 28% compared to 32% in the third quarter of the prior year. We had some favorable book tax adjustments, about $36 million in aggregate this third quarter, which helped which helped lower the tax rate versus last year. Looking forward into the fourth quarter, we expect our effective tax rate to be about 30%. Our trailing four-quarter average adjusted ROIC of 8.5%, improved from the 7.7% at the end of the second quarter and also significantly improved by 280 basis points from the 5.7% at the end of the third quarter last year. The 8.5% adjusted ROIC is above our 6.4% annual WACC for 2014, as well as our long-term WACC of 8% as reflected in the graph on Slide 18 in the appendix. Our objective remains to earn 200 basis points over WACC. In the third quarter, our trailing four-quarter average EVA was $553 million based upon adjusted earnings and the annual WACC. On Chart 17 in the appendix, you can see the reconciliation of our reported quarterly earnings of $1.14 per share to the adjusted earnings of $0.81 per share. For this quarter, LIFO represented a $315 million pretax credit or $0.30 per share after-tax as commodity prices significantly decreased through the quarter. We also incurred a charge of $102 million pretax or about $0.10 per share related to the hedging of the anticipated euro cash outflows related to the equity purchase of WILD Flavors.…

Thank you, Ray. And thank you all for joining us this morning. Please turn to Slide 8. I will start with segment operating profit and then move on to discuss the three major segments. Our underlying segment operating profit has improved sequentially each quarter of this year. In the third quarter, it increased 12% from the second quarter. On a year-over-year basis, significant improvements in Corn and Ag Services drove an overall increase of 45%. In each quarter of this year, the team has delivered year-over-year improvements in segment operating profit. I’ll walk through our third quarter results now. Starting on Slide 9, the oilseeds team delivered another solid quarter, with ample crop availability and a strong demand, European rapeseed crushing led a significant improvement in the softseed crushing globally. In soybean crushing, South American and European operations ran hard amid improved margins. In North America, the tight all crop being carried out led to record crush margins in the third quarter. Lower global commodity prices reduced third quarter farmer selling in South America, limiting origination volumes there. In Europe, with vegetable oils low-cost relatively to other energy sources, we had good biodiesel capacity utilization and improved margins during the quarter. The cocoa team ran assets harder in the improved margin environment and our results from Asia reflected weaker second quarter by Wilmar. Please turn now to Slide 10. The Corn Processing team delivered yet another strong quarter. Towards the end of the quarter, the seasonal decline in U.S. gasoline demand drove ethanol inventories higher and industry margins lower. Our flex capacity gave us opportunities to run different product mixes and to maximize overall margins. Corn-based ethanol is still the lowest cost obtaining enhance around the market and exports remain strong. The sweeteners and starches team continued to optimize their…

Turning to Slide 13 before we start Q&A. Thank you, Juan. Listening to that long list of activities this quarter that Juan just outlined, I reflect that for the past many quarters how focused we’ve been on actions to improve earnings and returns. And in this quarter on, many portfolio changes. And also we moved and opened a new global headquarters and customers center. The risk is during times like these that our teams becomes distracted or results slip. I am so proud of this team. They didn’t miss the beat with focus and discipline delivering very strong results during a very busy quarter. With that operator, please open the line for questions.

Certainly. (Operator Instructions) Your first question comes from the line of Kenneth Zaslow with BMO Capital Markets. Your line is open. Kenneth Zaslow – BMO Capital Markets: Hi, good morning everyone.

Good morning, Ken. Kenneth Zaslow – BMO Capital Markets: Just a couple of questions. One is can you talk about your results in high-fructose corn syrup, that kind of exceeded our expectations. I didn’t know, if how much of that is repeatable, how you kind of think about it with just your intellectual capital to just no at a price of corn side of it. Can you just give us a heads up on that?

Sure, Ken. Good morning. This is Juan. As you said, very good results in sweeteners and starches. The volumes were steady driven by pretty much stronger domestic shipments and volume also from other products. Your heard us saying before that we’ve diversified to other products. So we saw corn syrup, we saw dextrose volumes going up. And the Mexican volume, as we’ve been reporting, has been down but better than expected. The demand there remains stronger than anticipated. So with our ability to flex capacity and optimize transportation and optimize product mix, we continue to see results in sweeteners and the starches that are exceeding our own expectations to be honest, our own forecasts. Kenneth Zaslow – BMO Capital Markets: And do you expect this to be repeatable? Is this something that is an ongoing trend, or is this something that was specific to the quarter?

No, I think that this is driven by the improvements that our team is doing in managing this. So you know, Q4 is seasonally a little bit lower from a demand perspective, but we expect these results to continue in the future. Kenneth Zaslow – BMO Capital Markets: Great. And I have to ask the same question I probably ask every single time, but I got to ask anyway. If I think about your earnings power back to those couple of years where – the three or four years that you were in $3 of earnings, can you – and you’ve cut down costs by about $400 million which is about $0.40, you’re buying back stock another $0.03, you’re making acquisitions, you’re deploying capital. Is there a framework besides the 200 basis points upon return on investment capital, that kind of can get us closer to what you kind of think will be your earnings power over the next – again year to three years and the progression of that?

Yes, I think as you described, we’ve done a bulk of things trying to improve returns. And I think that a lot of them are in the process of being executed, as you see some of the portfolio management are in the process of being close those transactions. Some of the operational improvements are already rolling into the bottom line and will continue to do so. And then there are some things that are, we’re going to experience for the first time probably like Ag Services and running our assets at full utilization based on this new record crop that we will have in the United States. So I think that we are gathering all that information to determine a little bit what is our next – our new level of earnings power. But we are as encouraged as your comments are, in terms of all the things that we’re doing to get the company better and the returns. Kenneth Zaslow – BMO Capital Markets: Will we hear from you on a little bit more specifics at the Analyst Day?

You will hear from me on the Analysts Day. That’s for sure. Yes, we will provide a little bit more in the Analyst Day. Kenneth Zaslow – BMO Capital Markets: Great, thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Tim Tiberio with Miller Tabak. Your line is open. Tim Tiberio – Miller Tabak: Good morning, and thanks for taking my question. Juan, looking at the large size of the crop, I know the harvesting progress has been a bit behind the schedule, but at this point, is there any reason why we should not think that Ag Services could be back to normalized levels, or if not even greater, at this point?

Yes, Tim. As you said, the harvest is progressing normally. I will say normally for soybean, a little bit maybe behind for corn. So we are very optimistic about the first part of the harvest. We are very optimistic about the results we are seeing right now in Ag Services, and we expect very good result for Ag Services going forward, yes. Tim Tiberio – Miller Tabak: And would you expect that maybe the mix shifts a little bit more towards ADM making more money on storage versus transportation and logistics?

Yes. I think the grain business will pick-up versus this quarter. This quarter was basically, the performance was driven very much by a strong international merchandizing and transportation, but grain obviously July and August, we didn’t have much movement. So yes, we expect grain results to pick-up in Q4. Tim Tiberio – Miller Tabak: Okay. And then just lastly, we’ve seen quite a spike in soy meal, there has been some speculation around logistics being difficult for livestock producers, there is also been some questions around quality of the actual protein in the soy meal. Can you kind of give us your thoughts of how – what ADM is seeing in the market, how you’re positioned logistically. And whether you expect this to be, both, an opportunity or a challenge for the business into Q4?

Sure. So we always refer, Tim, to the footprint that we have in both of our businesses – in the processing businesses in corn and soybeans or oilseeds. And this is another example in which the soybean footprint that we have given us great access to soybean. So from an inbound freight perspective, we don’t rely that much on rail and that has been most of the problem in the U.S. So we rely a lot on trucking. So we haven’t had a lot of problems in getting beans into our plants. Obviously we knew that logistics problems could happen in Q3 and Q4, so we have prepared for that. So I will say no problems coming in. Coming out, we also – as I said, we prepare so we haven’t seen any problems. We’ve been able to deliver to our customers as per schedule. And this is where some of our previous investments in transportation in all the modes of transportations are paying off. And I think the pipeline was empty, and we knew that it was going to be transition to refill that pipeline. It was a little bit of maybe panic selling from some of the customers at one point in time. We think that that has subsided now. And so we think we transition into the new crop. But all in all, I would say that the transportation team and the oilseed teams have performed very well, have plants running at high capacity, and actually customers very well supplied. So all in all, I think we have a great team doing pretty well there. Tim Tiberio – Miller Tabak: Thanks Juan.

Your next question comes from the line of Michael Piken with Cleveland Research. Your line is open. Michael Piken – Cleveland Research: Yes, good morning. Couple of questions on ethanol. The margins had been quite solid and there has been obviously pretty big seasonal sell-off kind of post-Labor Day, but as you kind of look out into 2015, what do you think is the effective operating capacity for total U.S. production?

Yes, Michael, as you said, margins were very good during the quarter and then they drop as driving miles came reduced after the summer. So what we see for 2015 is pretty much something relatively similar to what we saw in 2014, because we’ve seen actually about the same amount of export capacity, so in the range of 800 million gallon to maybe a billion gallon. And then about the same domestic demand, so maybe 13.5 something in that range. So we expect 14.3 or something in that range for total production on an estimated capacity out there, something in the range of 14.5 to 14.7 depending on how much that capacity is actually running. Michael Piken – Cleveland Research: Okay. And can you give us any sense for kind of how far you’re hedged along in 4Q at this point?

Yes, in any particular quarter we go sometimes between 25% and 75%. So I would say a little bit under 50% maybe. Michael Piken – Cleveland Research: Okay, great. And then what are your thoughts on specifically the exports to Brazil in next couple of months?

Listen, Brazil is having a lot of movements at this point in time. You see, they approved increasing the blending grades to 27.5%. We have been able, as an industry, to diversify very much the sources of our exports. So it’s going to Canada, Mexico, Middle East, Asia, and sometimes to Brazil. So we’re now very dependent on Brazil. So we feel pretty good about the sustainability of our exports. Our own export program is very strong from Q4 and extends well into 2015. So we feel good about it. Michael Piken – Cleveland Research: Okay. Thank you very much.

You’re welcome.

Your next question comes from the line of Ann Duignan with JP Morgan. Your line is open. Ann Duignan – JP Morgan: Hi good morning.

Hello Ann. Ann Duignan – JP Morgan: Can you talk a little bit about – you noted that you expect the meal demand to pick-up domestically in the quarter. What’s going to drive that pick-up in demand? And then what are you seeing out there from DDGs in terms of competition with meal?

Yes, I think we saw – as I said before, the pipeline was a little bit empty. We still see strong demand domestically and for exports for meal in the United States. DDGs are finding their way into the market by pricing themselves into the market. We haven’t seen a lot of impact yet in to soybean meal to be honest. Our book continues to be very solid for the few coming months. So we expect, Ann, crushing margins to be strong this quarter and weigh into late Q1. As we see Brazil maybe having a little bit of late planting, we might have a little bit more of a tail U.S. exporting late into Q1 next year. Ann Duignan – JP Morgan: Okay, thank you. And then just from a modeling perspective, how should we model WILD Flavors for this upcoming quarter? I know it will be a separate segment I think you said from the start of next year, but just from a modeling perspective, how should we think about it this quarter?

Ann, it’s Ray here. So you’ll find – we’ll report WILD as part of the other segment as we kind of go through the transition this fourth quarter and setting up the fourth business unit. And so I expect that we’re going to have a lot of transaction closing costs related to WILD. And so those types of transaction costs will kind of offset some of the operating profits that WILD will generate. So I’d say that for the fourth quarter for modeling purposes, you should view as fairly immaterial. Frankly, we’re going to have a good start from January 1 with the fourth segment, and I just encourage you to start modeling the fourth segment modeling the WILD effective January 1. Ann Duignan – JP Morgan: Okay, thanks. And then just finally, a quick follow-up on ethanol. What’s your outlook for margins going forward, given oil prices in where they are trending?

Yes. Ethanol margins basically were pretty healthy in Q3 and then they dropped significantly as inventories climbed, but you see that the industry is behaving a little bit different now maybe better supply/demand fundamentals. And the inventory is starting to correct. And we’ve seen that correction and that reduction in October. And margins have since the end of September actually improved a little bit. So we expect some of these volatility that we described before to continue but it’s been – the industry is behaving in a much better way this year than we saw for example last year. Ann Duignan – JP Morgan: So margins steady to down maybe just on lower oil prices. Is that the right way to think about it?

I think if you think versus Q3, margins will be softer than Q3. Ann Duignan – JP Morgan: Okay. Thank you. I’ll get back in queue.

Okay.

Your next question comes from the line of Farha Aslam with Stephens Inc. Your line is open. Farha Aslam – Stephens Inc: Hi good morning.

Good morning, Farha.

Good morning, Farha. Farha Aslam – Stephens Inc: Just kind of a big picture question. We’ve seen a lot of FX movements around the world recently. I was just wondering, how does ADM manage through that? Are these positives or negatives with your expanded international footprint?

Farha, it’s Ray here. What’s interesting is in the third quarter with all the movements of FX, the actual translation impact for this company was less than $5 million unfavorable. So you can tell that, we actually have a fairly balanced footprint. As you know, we hedge generally transactional exposures, but we also have a fairly balanced cost and revenue footprint as well. So generally speaking, whenever you see the volatility of the FX occur, you don’t usually see us reporting FX as being a major driver of our profitability. Farha Aslam – Stephens Inc: Okay, so a little impact. And then when we look at the timing of crops and the opportunities of crop availability, the U.S. harvest is coming in a little late. Does that affect and push out earnings from the fourth quarter into the March quarter, just to start with the U.S., sorry – is that how we should think about it, or are you seeing just rate bases opportunities in the U.S. in Ag Services?

Farha, this is Juan. We still see very good opportunities for Q4 for Ag Services. It’s still probably too early to call that some will overspill into Q1. Farha Aslam – Stephens Inc: Okay. And then just going down to Brazil and Argentina. Have the farmers in Argentina started to sell any movements on that. And then in Brazil, if you could just provide us an update on sort of crush opportunities in Brazil and export opportunities there?

Yes. I would say in Argentina, the farmers sold a little bit with all these rally in soybeans, but they still hold maybe 18 million tonnes of soybeans over there of crops. So nothing materially has changed, although we’ve seen a little bit more movement. A little bit the same in Brazil. You know in our remarks, we highlighted the lack of farmers selling in Brazil. We saw recently over the last few days, up until the elections a little bit of a better selling, but still reluctant seller – still way behind last year in terms of selling. In terms of exports from Brazil. Brazil, due to the big inverse exported very early on into the season. So there is not much to export now. So we are watching the planting and the growing next. Farha Aslam – Stephens Inc: Great. And my final question relates to ethanol and Mexico. You highlighted, Juan, the octane value ethanol. Are you seeing Mexico potentially increase the amount of ethanol it takes from the U.S. simply as an octane and do you see ethanol replacing MTBE in Mexico over the long-term?

Yes, as you described we have seen markets after markets changing away from MTBE. Obviously Mexico is one of those markets that are still in MTBE. So we see that as a potential opportunity ahead of us, sure. Farha Aslam – Stephens Inc: Okay, great. Thank you.

You’re welcome.

Thanks Farha.

Your next question comes from the line of David Driscoll with Citi Research. Your line is open. David Driscoll – Citi Research: Thank you and good morning.

Good morning, David.

Good morning, David. David Driscoll – Citi Research: I wanted to follow-on some of these ethanol questions. In the fourth quarter, Juan, you mentioned that you had about 50% in the business hedged. Is it fair to say that they were hedged at rates similar to the third quarter and that other 50% is just exposed to kind of the current trends?

They’ll be David. Yes, when we hedged an asset under 50%. So when we hedge obviously is because we thought that those margins were appropriate to and were attractive to be hedged. And we expect the rest of the Q4 to be, as I said before, a little bit lower than Q3. Margins have recovered some, but they are not of the same quality of early in Q3. David Driscoll – Citi Research: A question here on oil prices and ethanol. The volatility on oil has been significant, and it has changed the complexion of ethanol. Is there anything that you can do to hedge the risk of a significant oil price decline? I mean there is a number of banks that are calling for a potentially significant decline in oil mid-part of 2015. And I am just wondering if this is a risk that it could at least – can you guys hedge that to some degree to prevent any really bad scenarios from transpiring within ethanol?

Obviously the thing is, it’s working very hard in scenario management and devising of options going forward. Brent, which is the big driver for our exports, if you will, is still at $82, and $82 ethanol still does very well. So we have still not at that point, but certainly we always do scenario management for much lower oil prices. So too early to tell what we can do, but we are developing options, yes. David Driscoll – Citi Research: All right. Two final follow-ups on this one. So if ethanol is doing so well in its comparison to gasoline, why don’t you have a more optimistic forecast on 2015 ethanol exports? And I don’t mean this too critically. I mean quite frankly, I puzzle over this myself, why is it the export forecasts stronger given ethanol’s comparison to gasoline. Why isn’t the ethanol industry at large, not just ADM, why aren’t we seeing just like significant expansions so we get to kind of max capacity in play with the residual being exported?

Yes, I think developing export markets take time. Sometimes people also – customers want to make sure that they have security of supply before incorporating or changing their formulas. So we see the growth David. And if you heard my comments, I referred to $800 million to $1 billion. This year we’re going to be $800 million. So we are thinking about maybe 25% increase from next year, which is not un-significant. So obviously I would like to see it $1.5 billion and we will drive to try to do that. But we think that it continues to climb, and it’s – the U.S. becomes a more regular and reliable supplier of global markets. So at this oil prices, we continue to see export growing, let’s put it that way. David Driscoll – Citi Research: If I could sneak a final question in on the transport side, because you have the barge network and you own so much rail, can you guys just answer directly, are rail bottlenecks fundamentally positive or negative for ADM? I feel like depending on which part of your business I look at, I can almost come out to any answer. So I think we need some guidance from you on saying if this winner is just a mess, does ADM come out a winner because you guys just have this amazing transportation network in the United States, and that net-net turns out positive for you. Is that reasonable, or is that just the wrong way to think about it?

I think the way we’d like to think about it is the net positive for our customers, because they would always get supplied. And I think that overall it’s a competitive advantage of ADM. So I would say relatively to others, I think it’s a positive. David Driscoll – Citi Research: Thank you. I’ll pass it along.

Your next question comes from the line of Robert Moskow with Crédit Suisse. Robert Moskow – Crédit Suisse: Hi there. I wanted to ask about your Analyst Day. And I think the last time we met, Pat, I think you were talking more optimistically or at least looking ahead at possibly giving a bottom range of earnings guidance, kind of like some way of looking at ‘15 earnings in new terms, maybe at least $3 or at least some number. I want to know if you’re still thinking about that as a way of giving guidance going forward. And also I think you were really thinking about the ethanol business as being a much more predictable type of business, more stable, now that capacity has kind of leveled off and corn is cheap. So what’s happened in the oil markets changed your thinking at all on the predictability of corn processing, and then how you would communicate to the street? Thanks.

Yes, maybe starting with the later, Rob, and then to your first question. On ethanol business, I think we still believe and do believe that there is more stability, albeit some volatility expected in the future. And the stability comes from the strength of the behavior in the market where producers are, sort of a balance of supply and demand, and that exports continue as, Juan described a moment ago, exports do continue to grow. And the competitiveness of ethanol with Alkylat, [indiscernible] MTBE, the whole laundry list of oxygen components that ethanol truly is the most economically competitive. So while one of the scenarios that people push of, what are the puts and takes here or what are the bear case or bull case, crude oil prices have been somewhat stable in that $100 range for four years. So kind of the scenario of generally more stable oil prices was a much more stable ethanol environment. I think the fact that oil prices are more volatile maybe than anyone predicted just several months ago, does mean there is more scenario planning here, but I think the option for ethanol business to be more stable this year than last, next year than this etcetera, still stands because of the supply and demand situation. Your question about our opportunities to describe a little more in detail on Investor Day some of our outlooks. We are very encouraged about 2015 relative to recent years, so we’ll look probably at that time on some of the drivers on 2015 and the strengths, and sort of again the puts and takes, the improvements we’re making in the business and the categories that Juan talked about, whether it be improvement in the business, the portfolio changes and the investments to grow. So I think stay tuned for our Investor Day to have more outlook on that. Capital allocation and resource allocation will be another thing. We’ll try to put a little more meat on the bones because were just in the process of looking forward for our business plans as we speak. Robert Moskow – Crédit Suisse: That’s very helpful. Thanks. A follow-up. I’m still little unclear on sweeteners and starches and how it reported such a good quarter based on mix. What part of the mix are you emphasizing? Is it the starches specifically? And I think Ken already asked this question, but can we point again to another strong fourth quarter as this mix effort continues?

Rob, no, I think it’s more on the alternative sweeteners, other sweeteners like corn syrups or dextrose or things like that. And listen, it doesn’t take much because we have swing capacity with ethanol and we have swing capacity with other 20-something products. So what we do is to manage all that and also our customer base to optimize the whole business. So but I think fundamentally what’s probably happening is that demand was a little bit stronger than probably everybody anticipated in this quarter, both domestically and on exports. So when we see at Q4, although the strength of sweeteners and starches as a business will continue, we see a little bit lower volumes from normal seasonality perspective as we grow into the winter. Robert Moskow – Crédit Suisse: Okay. Thank you so much.

Welcome.

Your next question comes from the line of Adam Samuelson with Goldman Sachs. Your line is open. Adam Samuelson – Goldman Sachs: Thanks. Good morning everyone. A little bit of a longer term question given the performance in 3Q, the outlook for pretty strong kind of market environment in 4Q in entering 2015, trying to think about the areas of the business where the returns have really not recovered yet. And I would imagine, Ag Services would be in that bucket, but some good confidence that inflects in 2015. Clearly ethanol has gotten better this year. Asia is probably been challenged with Wilmar with oilseeds crush in China, but maybe walk us through the parts of the portfolio where you the see the most opportunity for returns improvement going forward, maybe outside of kind of the core U.S. merchandizing piece to think about opportunities for earnings growth in ‘15 and beyond?

Yes, Adam, Juan here. Listen, if I have to rank what is the biggest opportunity for improvement in returns, it’s probably related to our participation in South America through oilseeds. This year has been very poor in terms of farmers selling and our earnings had been subdued there because of that. So we don’t expect that to repeat every year, and we think that that’s an opportunity ahead of us for improvement. As we described, Ag Services, I think we see that given the high operating environment, they’re going to face. And I would say the other businesses that we have publicly said that we trying to recover, is the cocoa business, which is a business that we are very hard to improve returns after the divestiture of chocolate. So those are probably the two areas that could see a more significant improvement next year, or in years to come. Adam Samuelson – Goldman Sachs: And on the point on South America on the farmers selling, is that something where you see the opportunity is really beginning in 4Q, or you think this is really going to be not till the next crop comes in before the opportunities reemerge?

I think – personally I think it’s more Q1 phenomenon than Q4. Adam Samuelson – Goldman Sachs: Okay, that’s helpful. And then maybe a question for Ray on some of the growth investments. I know you started – you kind of listed through them quickly on the Slide 12, but help us think about the amount of capital that’s going – that’s employed on some of these growth projects that starts to come into – that starts running a return in ‘15 and how much is left to earn in ‘16?

Yes, lot of the – when we talk about the $0.9 billion in CapEx for this calendar year, a lot of it actually incorporates many of these investments, for example our China investments. We’re close to completion of that. That’s built into our capital budget, some of the premix investments. And the Brazil investments are going to spread out over a couple of years. So generally the way you look at it is that through really a very good capital discipline in reducing the amount of, let’s say, capital being spent on say maintenance activity, we may able to redeploy a lot of this stuff into growth. So going forward in order to finance this stuff, there was probably going to be increase in terms of the amount of CapEx that we would have, but it’s not going to be materially relative to our depreciation and amortization rates. Adam Samuelson – Goldman Sachs: Okay, that’s helpful. Maybe just a last quick from me. The Q4 thoughts on working capital, I mean obviously very large harvest, I’d imagine the volume opportunities in the U.S. are sizable. How should we think about the cash used for working capital in the fourth quarter? Thanks.

You should expect an increase in terms of the use of working capital, but again, prices have come down generally compared to last year. And hence therefore, the net increase in terms of dollar value terms is not going to that dramatic. And based upon the balance sheet that we have that will be easily financeable. Adam Samuelson – Goldman Sachs: All right, great. Thanks very much.

Your next question comes from the line of Diane Geissler with CLSA. Your line is open. Diane Geissler – CLSA: Good morning.

Good morning, Diane.

Good morning, Diane. Diane Geissler – CLSA: So I wanted to ask about basis opportunities. I think you touched on it with regard to some of the freight issues that we’ve seen. I guess I look at corn prices today and they are a little bit higher than I would have thought they should be given the size of the crop, and I think obviously the lateness of the crop and maybe some of the freight issues that are baked into that price. So I guess my question is really not speaking directly to your rail hedges or whatever, but just your ability to sort of source material in the upper Midwest and maybe a market environment where flow of the product isn’t as seamless as some of the end-users would like it to be. Can you talk a little bit about how you would be positioned in that kind of market given your asset base?

Yes, Diane, listen. Obviously, we’ve been looking at that for a long time, and we have been preparing for these tight rail environment. So I think the guys have been doing an incredible work of sourcing product from all the locations. We feel very good going into this harvest. We feel we are executing very well at this point in time. Transportation is working very, very close with the businesses, both the grain business and the corn and soybean business. So that’s where we do and that’s where the team excel at when there are these difficulties. So I think that you could be assured that we will, in that sense, maximize the basis opportunities and we will continue to keep our customers and our plants supplied. So we have not had – we were reflecting yesterday that these transportation questions started to fill a little bit like the Ukraine question that everybody is expecting something to happen, and for us has been normal so far. And for us, we cannot report any issues that have impacted our earnings because of transportation issues so far. Are they going to become worse coming out? Yes, probably. The weather is going to become worse as we get into the winter and think they are going to become more complicated. But it’s hard to point out at this point in time in Q3 and maybe so far in Q4 any issue that we have had related to that. Diane Geissler – CLSA: Well, I guess what was behind my question is really it could potentially be a big benefit for you if you’re able to source the material and store it in light of bottlenecks within the transportation system depending on how desperate farmers are to sell at today’s price. I haven’t noted the level of desperation for farmers to sell with corn below $4, but obviously you are speaking to them more frequently than I am. So if you could maybe talk about the mood amongst the farmers to market in this kind of environment?

I think as you described, it hasn’t been the desperation selling at this point in time. So we continue to be very close to them and continue to have our assets ready to take advantage of this location, that’s what we do. At this point in time, obviously there is a big accumulation of grain in the interior and there is a big need for grains sometimes at the export terminals and the ability to transport that is what we possess. So I think there are many opportunities ahead of us in Q4. That’s why we are positive about. Diane Geissler – CLSA: Okay. And then I just also wanted to ask about the expanded JV in the Northwest. Could you talk a little bit about what’s included now in your asset network there, and what you have in terms of capacity for exports out of the Pacific Northwest with the expanded JV?

Yes, I don’t remember the actual capacities, Diane. We used to have 50% of the Kalama and now K5 has been incorporated into that. And now with that we have share of about 32%, although still the same management rights that we had before. So with that, we basically have expanded our ability to source from two different ports, if you will. I just don’t remember on top off my head the capacities and we can get you that if you are interested. Diane Geissler – CLSA: Okay, well I guess the question is, with the expansion in your [Technical Difficulty] is that signal to us that you’re going to be adding assets in that area?

Not at this point, no. Diane Geissler – CLSA: Okay.

This was more like an optimization plan, if you will, Diane, than to decide to expand. Diane Geissler – CLSA: Okay, terrific. Thank you.

Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Eric Larson with Janney Capital Markets. Your line is open. Eric Larson – Janney Capital Markets: Thank you. I snuck in just before the bell here. A couple of questions. First one is for Juan. Juan, you have certainly made some improvement in the international merchandizing business like you said, you were going to when you ran into the ADM specific problems several quarters ago. In your terms, how far have you recovered on that? Have you gotten back 50% of the goal line there, or how would you characterize the recovery in that business from a timing point of view?

Yes, you recall correctly. We highlighted that at one point in time, and I’m very proud of the team. The team took ownership of the problems and we made significant changes in the cost position, in the way we operate, in the way we commercialize to be honest as well. I would say, if I have to say from 0% to 100%, we are probably 70% of what we wanted to achieve. Eric Larson – Janney Capital Markets: Okay. And so when you look at the third quarter of merchandizing profits of $64 million of your EBIT, can you give us a flavor for kind of the domestic/international component of that number?

I don’t have it top off my head, Eric, but I think what we highlighted was the improvement was significant versus same quarter last year in international merchandizing. Domestic grain continues to be a very large business for us when you compare to international merchandizing. So well, we can give you the breakdown, I just don’t remember. Eric Larson – Janney Capital Markets: Okay. And would places like the Ukraine structurally be having difficulties? Despite the specific ADM issues, are there regions like the Ukraine that would have a negative delta year-over-year in the most recent quarter or two?

No, actually we’re thinking that in Eastern Europe with the good crops, we will see a big opportunity for us to utilize our even recent investments even more. So we are actually very bullish about international merchandizing opportunities in Eastern Europe. Eric Larson – Janney Capital Markets: Okay. Then quickly, my next question is for Ray. Ray – and I really want to drill down on the return on invested capital component. You’re now 210 basis points above your current WACC, a good 50 basis points above kind of your long-term goals. When I look at that number, if you look at the last four quarters, you’ve obviously made good sequential quarterly improvement, but arguably you are not where – those last four quarters on average certainly aren’t anywhere near what you think you can probably do. And then your laundry list of moving assets and buying assets and selling, I mean your focus on ROIC has been phenomenal. And then you’ve got your $400 million SG&A savings, and I don’t think that that’s an absolute number that will be in your 2014. I think that $400 million is a run rate number, correct? And so when I look at the snap up in ROIC potentially in 2015, if markets continue to improve etcetera, I mean why couldn’t you be above or at or close to or above your 10% 200 basis points above your long-term average in a relatively short period of time?

Well, first of all Eric, I think we’re very encouraged in terms of the trends that we’re showing in terms of ROIC. And you’re right, the $400 million in cost savings, which by the way, that’s more of a cost of goods sold, type of savings. And that’s relative to the cost base as of January 1, 2013. So we’ve been working that over a two-year period. But yes, I mean that’s going to help us in terms of improving returns in the future as well. We’re adjusting our portfolio. And so therefore, we are divesting businesses which have low returns and investing in businesses that eventually will generate good returns. And just to remind you, WILD Flavors, it’s going to take us some time in order to get up to the returns that we talked about. And so therefore I think we are encouraged. There is no doubt that we are in a positive trend in terms of returns. Our objective clearly is to earn the long-term WACC of 8% plus 200 basis points. Whether we get there next year, needs to be determined. There are headwinds, as many of you folks on the phone call have also pointed out regarding crude oil prices and where that in impact on ethanol. I mean there is some headwinds there, but we’re also very encouraged about the tailwinds that we’re also getting in our business, namely the fact that we’re going to have a very good U.S. harvest that’s going to help Ag Services particularly next year. Eric Larson – Janney Capital Markets: Okay. And then finally, and then I’ll go back in queue or you’ll end the call. But the month of October with grain prices, it’s very rare to see that kind of a bull rally into the harvest like we have seen it, producers – Christmas came early for the producers here. And when I look at last week, just penciling in rough numbers. I think last week was the single largest grain production week ever in the United States, just by running some numbers here. And does that potentially still give you going forward now month of November – I think in the next two weeks in November are going to be pretty interesting. Does that give you potentially more basis opportunity for the fourth quarter – well, and not just sort of just the fourth quarter, but I mean it would carryover go maybe to spread out for the quarters in 2015 as well, but is there a near-term opportunity here that is encouraging to you?

Yes, it is. Yes, we see it. Eric Larson – Janney Capital Markets: Okay. That’s what all I expected for an answer. Thank you everyone.

Thanks Eric.

Our next question comes from the line of Vincent Andrews with Morgan Stanley. Your line is open. Vincent Andrews – Morgan Stanley: Thanks very much for taking my question. Pat, I just wondered if you had an update on sort of higher ethanol blend rates. It really hasn’t come up very much in a while either sort of on these calls or in the press, and I recall EPA was supposed to be working on cars older than 2001 for approval. And I’m just curious if that’s still a focus or where that is?

Right. There is no update that I have for you today or that we have. With the elections too, there is not many topics that are on the minds in Washington other than these current elections. So I have not anything today. Vincent Andrews – Morgan Stanley: Okay. Thanks very much.

Thanks Vince.

I’m showing that there are no further questions at this time. I’ll turn the call back over to Patricia Woertz.

Great. Well, thank you everyone for joining us today. We do note on Slide 14 the date of our Investor Day, which is December 3rd in Chicago. And of course if any of you have any follow-up questions, please be in touch with Christina, and thanks all for your interest and time. Bye-bye now.