Thank you, Clayton. I'll provide updates for some of the litigation activity in Acacia's CCE, Saint Lawrence and Limestone subsidiaries. Starting with Cellular Communications Equipment, or CCE, there are remaining lawsuits against HTC, ZTE and the major cellular carriers. Trial for HTC and ZTE are currently scheduled to begin on September 17, 2018. Second trial against the same two defendants is scheduled for February of 2019. On the call last quarter, I referred to three IPR proceedings against three CCE patents conducted on the same day, for which CCE prevailed, but which had subsequently been appealed to the Federal Circuit. I reported that the Federal Circuit had affirmed two of those three IPR rulings in CCE's favor, but we awaited a ruling for the third. I can report now that the Federal Circuit also affirmed entirely the third IPR case for CCE. Additional IPR proceedings for other CCE patents are ongoing. For example, we recently received an adverse decision in a separate IPR proceeding, but that ruling does not impact the aforementioned trials. Next, I'll address Saint Lawrence and in particular the case pending against Apple. On January 22, in response to Saint Lawrence's and Apple's joint motion to stay all deadlines and notice of settlement, the District Court judge in Texas presiding over the case issued an order granting the requested 30-day stay. At this time, we do not have further comment on the status of the pending case against Apple. For the Saint Lawrence case against Motorola, for which Saint Lawrence was awarded a jury verdict in March 2017, our post-trial motion for enhanced damages was denied by the court, which we intend to appeal. In addition, we are still awaiting final rulings on other post-judgment motion filed with, and pending before, the trial court, including Saint Lawrence's motion to recover its attorney's fees. With respect to Limestone Memory Systems, the various IPR proceedings brought against the Limestone patents have now ended. Limestone received favorable outcomes from the patent trial and appeal board during the IPR proceedings and there are four patents remaining in the litigation. Parties filed a joint stipulation to lift the stay, which the court has grant, allowing the litigation to proceed. The court also has adopted a preliminary schedule governing the proceedings in the case, which includes a trial date set for January of 2020. We look forward on reporting on further developments in the cases just mentioned as well as litigation activity pending with other Acacia subsidiaries.